1
|
Morra S, Scheipner L, Baudo A, Jannello LMI, de Angelis M, Siech C, Goyal JA, Touma N, Tian Z, Saad F, Califano G, Celentano G, la Rocca R, Napolitano L, Shariat SF, Ahyai S, Carmignani L, de Cobelli O, Musi G, Briganti A, Chun FKH, Longo N, Karakiewicz PI. Unmarried status effect on stage at presentation and treatment patterns in primary urethral carcinoma patients. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:161.e17-161.e23. [PMID: 38320935 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unmarried status has been associated with advanced stage at presentation and lower treatment dose intensification rates in several urological and non-urological malignancies. However, no previous investigators focused of the association of unmarried status with locally advanced stage (T3-4N0-2) at presentation and lower bi-/trimodal therapy rates in primary urethral carcinoma (PUC) patients. To address these knowledge gaps, we relied on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. METHODS Within the SEER database 2000 to 2020, all non-metastatic PUC patients were identified. Logistic regression models (LRMs) tested for differences in stage at presentation and treatment modality in the overall cohort and then in a sex-specific fashion, according to marital status (married vs unmarried). RESULTS Of all 1,430 non-metastatic PUC patients, 1,004 (70%) were male vs 426 (30%) were female. Of 1,004 male PUC patients, 272 (27%) were unmarried. Of all 426 female PUC patients, 239 (56%) were unmarried. In multivariable LRMs predicting T3-4N0-2, unmarried status was independently associated with an increased risk of locally advanced stage at presentation in the overall cohort (odds ratio [OR]:1.31; P = 0.03) and in female patients (OR:1.62; P = 0.02), but not in male PUC patients (P = 0.6). In multivariable LRMs predicting bi-/trimodal therapy, unmarried status was an independent predictor of lower bi-/trimodal therapy rates in the overall cohort (OR:0.73; P = 0.02) and in male patients (OR:0.60; P = 0.007), but not in female PUC patients (P = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS Unmarried female PUC patients more likely harbored locally advanced stage at presentation. Conversely, unmarried male PUC patients are less likely to benefit from bi-/trimodal therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Morra
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
| | - Lukas Scheipner
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Goethe University, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Nawar Touma
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Gianluigi Califano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Celentano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto la Rocca
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Napolitano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Hourani Center of Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, Goethe University, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cirulli GO, Corsi N, Rakic I, Stephens A, Chiarelli G, Finati M, Davis M, Tinsley S, Sood A, Buffi N, Lughezzani G, Carrieri G, Salonia A, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Rogers C, Abdollah F. Impact of lymphovascular invasion on survival in surgically treated upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a nationwide analysis. BJU Int 2024; 133:555-563. [PMID: 38097533 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the prognostic ability of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) as a predictor of overall survival (OS) using a large North American cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS Our cohort included 5940 patients with clinical M0 UTUC who underwent a radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), between 2010 and 2016, within the National Cancer Database. The main variable of interest was LVI status, and its interaction with pathological nodal (pN) status. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to depict the OS also stratifying patients on LVI status. Cox regression analysis tested the impact of LVI status on OS after accounting for the available covariates. RESULTS The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age at diagnosis was 71 (63-78) years and most patients had pathological T1 stage disease (48.6%). Nodal status was pN0, pN1 and pNx in 45.8%, 6.3% and 47.9%, respectively. Overall, 22.1% had LVI. The median (IQR) follow-up time was 32.6 (16.0-53.3) months. At the 5-year postoperative follow-up, the estimated OS rate was 28% in patients with LVI vs 66% in those without LVI (P < 0.001). When patients were stratified based on nodal status those rates were 32% vs 68% in pN0 patients (P < 0.001), 23% vs 30% in pN1 patients (P = 0.8), and 28% vs 65% in pNx patients (P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, the presence of LVI was associated with less favourable OS (hazard ratio 1.79, 95% confidence interval 1.60-1.99; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Our study assessed the impact of LVI on OS in patients with UTUC in a large North American nationwide cohort. Our series, as the largest to date, indicate that LVI is associated with less favourable survival outcomes in patients with UTUC after RNU, and this variable could be used in counselling patients about their prognosis and might be a useful tool for future trials to risk-stratify patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Ottone Cirulli
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicholas Corsi
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Ivan Rakic
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Alex Stephens
- Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Giuseppe Chiarelli
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Finati
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Matthew Davis
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Shane Tinsley
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Akshay Sood
- Department of Urology, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Nicolò Buffi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Lughezzani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Carrieri
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Andrea Salonia
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Craig Rogers
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Firas Abdollah
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Morra S, Scheipner L, Baudo A, Jannello LMI, de Angelis M, Siech C, Goyal JA, Touma N, Tian Z, Saad F, Califano G, la Rocca R, Capece M, Shariat SF, Ahyai S, Carmignani L, de Cobelli O, Musi G, Briganti A, Chun FKH, Longo N, Karakiewicz PI. Regional differences in upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients across the United States. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:162.e1-162.e10. [PMID: 38336499 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unknown whether regional differences in patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients exist and may potentially result in regional overall mortality (OM) differences. We tested for inter-regional differences, according to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries. METHODS Using SEER database 2000 to 2016, patient (age, sex, race/ethnicity), tumor (location, grade) and treatment (nephroureterectomy, systemic therapy [ST]) characteristics of UTUC patients of all-stages were tabulated and graphically depicted in a stage-specific fashion (T1-2N0M0 vs. T3-4N0M0 vs. TanyN1-2M0/TanyNanyM1). Multivariable Cox regression (MCR) models tested for inter-regional differences in OM. RESULTS Regarding T1-2N0M0 patients, statistically significant differences existed for race/ethnicity (Caucasian 71 vs. 98%), location (renal pelvis: 55 vs. 67%), grade (high 60 vs. 83%) and ST (5.5 vs. 13.9%). In MCR models, registries 3 (Hazard ratio [HR]:1.39; P < 0.001) and 4 (HR:1.31; P = 0.01) independently predicted higher OM and Registry 8 (HR:0.64; P = 0.001) lower OM. Regarding T3-4N0M0 patients, statistically significant differences existed for race/ethnicity (Caucasian 70 vs. 98%), location (renal pelvis: 67 vs. 76%), grade (high 84 vs. 94%) and ST (18.7 vs. 29.5%). In MCR models, registries 3 (HR:1.42; P < 0.001) and 4 (HR:1.31; P = 0.009) independently predicted higher OM. Regarding TanyN1-2M0/TanyNanyM1 patients, statistically significant differences existed for location (renal pelvis: 63 vs. 82%), grade (high 92 vs. 98%) and ST (53.4 vs. 58.8%). In MCR models, Registry 3 (HR:1.37; P = 0.004) independently predicted higher OM and Registry 2, (HR:0.78; P = 0.02) lower OM. CONCLUSIONS Inter-regional differences were recorded in patients, tumor, and treatment characteristics. Even after adjustment for these characteristics, OM differences persisted which may be indicative of regional differences in quality of care or expertise in UTUC management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Morra
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
| | - Lukas Scheipner
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Nawar Touma
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Gianluigi Califano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto la Rocca
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Capece
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Hourani Center of Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi, Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gandaglia G, Pellegrino F, Golozar A, De Meulder B, Abbott T, Achtman A, Imran Omar M, Alshammari T, Areia C, Asiimwe A, Beyer K, Bjartell A, Campi R, Cornford P, Falconer T, Feng Q, Gong M, Herrera R, Hughes N, Hulsen T, Kinnaird A, Lai LYH, Maresca G, Mottet N, Oja M, Prinsen P, Reich C, Remmers S, Roobol MJ, Sakalis V, Seager S, Smith EJ, Snijder R, Steinbeisser C, Thurin NH, Hijazy A, van Bochove K, Van den Bergh RCN, Van Hemelrijck M, Willemse PP, Williams AE, Zounemat Kermani N, Evans-Axelsson S, Briganti A, N'Dow J. Clinical Characterization of Patients Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer and Undergoing Conservative Management: A PIONEER Analysis Based on Big Data. Eur Urol 2024; 85:457-465. [PMID: 37414703 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conservative management is an option for prostate cancer (PCa) patients either with the objective of delaying or even avoiding curative therapy, or to wait until palliative treatment is needed. PIONEER, funded by the European Commission Innovative Medicines Initiative, aims at improving PCa care across Europe through the application of big data analytics. OBJECTIVE To describe the clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of PCa patients on conservative management by using an international large network of real-world data. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS From an initial cohort of >100 000 000 adult individuals included in eight databases evaluated during a virtual study-a-thon hosted by PIONEER, we identified newly diagnosed PCa cases (n = 527 311). Among those, we selected patients who did not receive curative or palliative treatment within 6 mo from diagnosis (n = 123 146). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Patient and disease characteristics were reported. The number of patients who experienced the main study outcomes was quantified for each stratum and the overall cohort. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to estimate the distribution of time to event data. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The most common comorbidities were hypertension (35-73%), obesity (9.2-54%), and type 2 diabetes (11-28%). The rate of PCa-related symptomatic progression ranged between 2.6% and 6.2%. Hospitalization (12-25%) and emergency department visits (10-14%) were common events during the 1st year of follow-up. The probability of being free from both palliative and curative treatments decreased during follow-up. Limitations include a lack of information on patients and disease characteristics and on treatment intent. CONCLUSIONS Our results allow us to better understand the current landscape of patients with PCa managed with conservative treatment. PIONEER offers a unique opportunity to characterize the baseline features and outcomes of PCa patients managed conservatively using real-world data. PATIENT SUMMARY Up to 25% of men with prostate cancer (PCa) managed conservatively experienced hospitalization and emergency department visits within the 1st year after diagnosis; 6% experienced PCa-related symptoms. The probability of receiving therapies for PCa decreased according to time elapsed after the diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Gandaglia
- Guidelines Office, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
| | - Francesco Pellegrino
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Asieh Golozar
- Odysseus Data Services, New York, NY, USA; OHDSI Center, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Muhammad Imran Omar
- Guidelines Office, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
| | | | | | | | - Katharina Beyer
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Anders Bjartell
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Guidelines Office, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Thomas Falconer
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Qi Feng
- Astellas Pharma, Inc., Northbrook, IL, USA
| | - Mengchun Gong
- Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; DHC Technologies, Beijing, China
| | | | | | - Tim Hulsen
- Philips Research, Department of Hospital Services & Informatics, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Nicolas Mottet
- Guidelines Office, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Marek Oja
- Institute of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia; STACC, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Peter Prinsen
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sebastiaan Remmers
- Erasmus University Medical Centre, Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique J Roobol
- Erasmus University Medical Centre, Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vasileios Sakalis
- Department of Urology, General Hospital of Thessaloniki Agios Pavlos, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Emma J Smith
- Guidelines Office, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Nicolas H Thurin
- INSERM CIC-P 1401, Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Peter-Paul Willemse
- Guidelines Office, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Andrew E Williams
- The Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies at Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Alberto Briganti
- Guidelines Office, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - James N'Dow
- Guidelines Office, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Leni R, Roscigno M, Barzaghi P, La Croce G, Catellani M, Saccà A, de Angelis M, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Da Pozzo LF. Medium-term follow up of active surveillance for early prostate cancer at a non-academic institution. BJU Int 2024; 133:614-621. [PMID: 38093673 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report oncological outcomes of active surveillance (AS) at a single non-academic institution adopting the standardised Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS Competing risk analyses estimated the incidence of overall mortality, metastases, conversion to treatment, and grade reclassification. The incidence of reclassification and adverse pathological findings at radical prostatectomy were compared between patients fulfilling all PRIAS inclusion criteria vs those not fulfilling at least one. RESULTS We analysed 341 men with Grade Group 1 prostate cancer (PCa) followed on AS between 2010 and 2022. There were no PCa deaths, two patients developed distant metastases and were alive at the end of the study period. The 10-year cumulative incidence of metastases was 1.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-6.4%). A total of 111 men were reclassified, and 127 underwent definitive treatment. Men not fulfilling at least one PRIAS inclusion criteria (n = 43) had a higher incidence of reclassification (subdistribution hazards ratio 1.73, 95% CI 1.07-2.81; P = 0.03), but similar rates of adverse pathological findings at radical prostatectomy. CONCLUSION Metastases in men on AS at a non-academic institution are as rare as those reported in established international cohorts. Men followed without stringent inclusion criteria should be counselled about the higher incidence of reclassification and reassured they can expect rates of adverse pathological findings comparable to those fulfilling all criteria. Therefore, AS should be proposed to all men with low-grade PCa regardless of whether they are followed at academic institutions or smaller community hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Leni
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Roscigno
- University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Paolo Barzaghi
- Department of Urology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | | | - Antonino Saccà
- Department of Urology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Filippo Da Pozzo
- University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pederzoli F, Riba M, Venegoni C, Marandino L, Bandini M, Alchera E, Locatelli I, Raggi D, Giannatempo P, Provero P, Lazarevic D, Moschini M, Lucianò R, Gallina A, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Salonia A, Necchi A, Alfano M. Stool Microbiome Signature Associated with Response to Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab in Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol 2024; 85:417-421. [PMID: 38184414 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 11/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024]
Abstract
Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab has been shown to be a valid treatment for patients affected by muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), as demonstrated in the PURE-01 clinical trial (NCT02736266). Among the tumor-extrinsic factors influencing immunotherapy efficacy, extensive data highlighted that the microbiome is a central player in immune-mediated anticancer activity. This report aimed to investigate the composition and role of stool microbiome in patients enrolled in the PURE-01 clinical trial. An orthotopic animal model of bladder cancer (MB49-Luc) was used to support some of the findings from human data. An analysis of stool microbiome before pembrolizumab was conducted for 42 patients, of whom 23 showed a pathologic response. The information in the preclinical model of orthotopic bladder cancer treated with anti-PD-1 antibody or control isotype was validated. Linear discriminant analysis effect size and linear models were used to identify the bacterial taxa enriched in either responders or nonresponders. The identified taxa were also tested for their association with event-free survival (EFS). Survival at 31 d after tumor instillation was used as the study endpoint in the preclinical model. Responders and nonresponders emerged to differ in terms of enrichment for 16 bacterial taxa. Of these, the genus Sutterella was enriched in responders, while the species Ruminococcus bromii was enriched in nonresponders. The negative impact of R. bromii on anti-PD-1 antibody activity was also observed in the preclinical model. EFS and survival of the preclinical model showed a negative role of R. bromii. We found different stool bacterial taxa associated with the response or lack of response to neoadjuvant pembrolizumab. Moreover, we provided experimental data about the negative role of R. bromii on immunotherapy response. Further studies are needed to externally validate our findings and provide mechanistic insights about the host-pathogen interactions in MIBC. PATIENT SUMMARY: Using prepembrolizumab stool samples collected from patients enrolled in the PURE-01 clinical trials, we identified some bacterial taxa that were enriched in patients who either responded or did not respond to immunotherapy. Using an animal model of bladder cancer, we gathered further evidence of the negative impact of the Ruminococcus bromii on immunotherapy efficacy. Further studies are needed to confirm the current findings and test the utility of these bacteria as predictive markers of immunotherapy response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Pederzoli
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Michela Riba
- Center for Omics Sciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Chiara Venegoni
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Marandino
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Bandini
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa Alchera
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Irene Locatelli
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Raggi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Provero
- Center for Omics Sciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy; Department of Neurosciences 'Rita Levi Montalcini', University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Dejan Lazarevic
- Center for Omics Sciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberta Lucianò
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Gallina
- Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana (IOSI), Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Salonia
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Alfano
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ben-David R, Pellegrino F, Alerasool P, Tillu N, Lavallee E, Attalla K, Waingankar N, John SP, Mehrazin R, Moschini M, Martini A, Edeling S, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Wiklund P. Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy with cutaneous ureterostomies: a contemporary multicenter analysis. World J Urol 2024; 42:251. [PMID: 38652316 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04942-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) offers decreased blood loss during surgery, shorter hospital length of stay, and lower risk for thromboembolic events without hindering oncological outcomes. Cutaneous ureterostomies (UCS) are a seldom utilized diversion that can be a suitable alternative for a selected group of patients with competing co-morbidities and limited life expectancy. OBJECTIVE To describe operative and perioperative characteristics as well as oncological outcomes for patients that underwent RARC + UCS. METHODS Patients that underwent RARC + UCS during 2013-2023 in 3 centers (EU = 2, US = 1) were identified in a prospectively maintained database. Baseline characteristics, pathological, and oncological outcomes were analyzed. Descriptive statistics and survival analysis were performed using R language version 4.3.1. RESULTS Sixty-nine patients were included. The median age was 77 years (IQR 70-80) and the median follow-up time was 11 months (IQR 4-20). Ten patients were ASA 4 (14.5%). Nine patients underwent palliative cystectomy (13%). The median operation time was 241 min (IQR 202-290), and the median hospital stay was 8 days (IQR 6-11). The 30-day complication rate was 55.1% (grade ≥ 3a was 14.4%), and the 30-day readmission rate was 17.4%. Eleven patients developed metastatic recurrence (15.9%), and 14 patients (20.2%) died during the follow-up period. Overall survival at 6, 12, and 24 months was 84%, 81%, and 73%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS RARC + UCS may offer lower complication and readmission rates without the need to perform enteric anastomosis, it can be considered in a selected group of patients with competing co-morbidities, or limited life expectancy. Larger prospective studies are necessary to validate these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reuben Ben-David
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, 1425 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Francesco Pellegrino
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Urological Research Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Parissa Alerasool
- The Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Neeraja Tillu
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, 1425 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, USA
| | - Etienne Lavallee
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, 1425 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kyrollis Attalla
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, 1425 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nikhil Waingankar
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, 1425 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sfakianos P John
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, 1425 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, USA
| | - Reza Mehrazin
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, 1425 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Urological Research Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Martini
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Urological Research Institute, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Urological Research Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Urological Research Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Peter Wiklund
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, 1425 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sorce G, Stabile A, Pellegrino F, Mazzone E, Mattei A, Afferi L, Serni S, Minervini A, Roumiguiè M, Malavaud B, Valerio M, Rakauskas A, Marra G, Gontero P, Porpiglia F, Guo H, Zhuang J, Gandaglia G, Montorsi F, Briganti A. The impact of mpMRI-targeted vs systematic biopsy on the risk of prostate cancer downgrading at final pathology. World J Urol 2024; 42:248. [PMID: 38647689 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04963-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although targeted biopsies (TBx) are associated with improved disease assessment, concerns have been raised regarding the risk of prostate cancer (PCa) overgrading due to more accurate biopsy core deployment in the index lesion. METHODS We identified 1672 patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) with a positive mpMRI and ISUP ≥ 2 PCa detected via systematic biopsy (SBx) plus TBx. We compared downgrading rates at RP (ISUP 4-5, 3, and 2 at biopsy, to a lower ISUP) for PCa detected via SBx only (group 1), via TBx only (group 2), and eventually for PCa detected with the same ISUP 2-5 at both SBx and TBx (group 3), using multivariable logistic regression models (MVA). RESULTS Overall, 12 vs 14 vs 6% (n = 176 vs 227 vs 96) downgrading rates were recorded in group 1 vs group 2 vs group 3, respectively (p < 0.001). At MVA, group 2 was more likely to be downgraded (OR 1.26, p = 0.04), as compared to group 1. Conversely, group 3 was less likely to be downgraded at RP (OR 0.42, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Downgrading rates are highest when PCa is present in TBx only and, especially when the highest grade PCa is diagnosed by TBx cores only. Conversely, downgrading rates are lowest when PCa is identified with the same ISUP through both SBx and TBx. The presence of clinically significant disease at SBx + TBx may indicate a more reliable assessment of the disease at the time of biopsy potentially reducing the risk of downgrading at final pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Sorce
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - A Stabile
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| | - F Pellegrino
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - E Mazzone
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - A Mattei
- Klinik Für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzerner, Switzerland
| | - L Afferi
- Klinik Für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzerner, Switzerland
| | - S Serni
- Department of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - A Minervini
- Department of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - M Roumiguiè
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - B Malavaud
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - M Valerio
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - A Rakauskas
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - G Marra
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - P Gontero
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - F Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - H Guo
- Department of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - J Zhuang
- Department of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - G Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - F Montorsi
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - A Briganti
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Assad A, Barletta F, Incesu RB, Scheipner L, Morra S, Baudo A, Garcia CC, Tian Z, Ahyai S, Longo N, Chun FKH, Shariat SF, Tilki D, Briganti A, Saad F, Karakiewicz PI. Prognostic significance of lymph node count in surgically treated patients with T 2-4 stage nonmetastatic adrenocortical carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2024:S1078-1439(24)00423-X. [PMID: 38653591 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Revised: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The role of lymphadenectomy and the optimal lymph node count (LNC) cut-off in nonmetastatic adrenocortical carcinoma (nmACC) are unclear. METHODS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, surgically treated nmACC patients with T2-4 stages were identified between 2004 and 2020. We tested for cancer-specific mortality (CSM) differences according to pathological N-stage (pN0 vs. pN1) and two previously recommended LNC cut-offs (≥4 vs. ≥5) were tested in pN0 and subsequently in pN1 subgroups in Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression models. RESULTS Of 710 surgically treated nmACC patients, 185 (26%) underwent lymphadenectomy and were assessable for further analyses based on available LNC data. Of 185 assessable patients, 152 (82%) were pN0 and 33 (18%) were pN1. In Kaplan-Meier analyses, CSM-free survival was 74 vs. 14 months (Δ 60 months, P ≤ 0.001) in pN0 vs. pN1 patients, respectively. In multivariable analyses, pN1 was an independent predictor of higher CSM (HR:3.13, P < 0.001). In sensitivity analyses addressing pN0, LNC cut-off of ≥4 was associated with lower CSM (multivariable hazard ratio [HR]: 0.52; P = 0.002). In sensitivity analyses addressing pN0, no difference was recorded when a LNC cut-off of ≥5 was used (HR:0.60, P = 0.09). In pN1 patients, neither of the cut-offs (≥4 and ≥5) resulted in a statistically significant stratification of CSM rate, and neither reached independent predictor status (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Lymphadenectomy provides a prognostic benefit in nmACC patients and identifies pN1 patients with dismal prognosis. Conversely, in pN0 patients, a LNC cut-off ≥4 identifies those with particularly favorable prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anis Assad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Reha-Baris Incesu
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lukas Scheipner
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Simone Morra
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Cano Garcia
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Hourani Center of Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cei F, Larcher A, Rosiello G, Basile G, Musso G, Re C, Fallara G, Belladelli F, Brembilla G, Guazzarotti G, De Cobelli F, Marandino L, Necchi A, Briganti A, Salonia A, Bertini R, Montorsi F, Capitanio U. Preoperative risk calculator for the probability of completing nephron sparing for kidney cancer. Urol Oncol 2024:S1078-1439(24)00047-4. [PMID: 38644109 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE In absence of predictive models, preoperative estimation of the probability of completing partial (PN) relative to radical nephrectomy (RN) is invariably inaccurate and subjective. We aimed to develop an evidence-based model to assess objectively the probability of PN completion based on patients' characteristics, tumor's complexity, urologist expertise and surgical approach. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS 675 patients treated with PN or RN for cT1-2 cN0 cM0 renal mass by seven surgeons at one single experienced centre from 2000 to 2019. OUTCOMES MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES The outcome of the study was PN completion. We used a multivariable logistic regression (MVA) model to investigate predictors of PN completion. We used SPARE score to assess tumor complexity. We used a bootstrap validation to compute the model's predictive accuracy. We investigated the relationship between the outcomes and specific predictors of interest such as tumor's complexity, approach and experience. RESULTS Of 675 patients, 360 (53%) were treated with PN vs. 315 (47%) with RN. Smaller tumors [Odds ratio (OR): 0.52, 95%CI 0.44-0.61; P < 0.001], lower SPARE score (OR: 0.67, 95%CI 0.47-0.94; P = 0.02), more experienced surgeons (OR: 1.01, 95%CI 1.00-1.02; P < 0.01), robotic (OR: 10; P < 0.001) and open (OR: 36; P < 0.001) compared to laparoscopic approach resulted associated with higher probability of PN completion. Predictive accuracy of the model was 0.94 (95% CI 0.93-0.95). CONCLUSIONS The probability of PN completion can be preoperatively assessed, with optimal accuracy relaying on routinely available clinical information. The proposed model might be useful in preoperative decision-making, patient consensus, or during preoperative counselling. PATIENT SUMMARY In patients with a renal mass the probability of completing a partial nephrectomy varies considerably and without a predictive model is invariably inaccurate and subjective. In this study we build-up a risk calculator based on easily available preoperative variables that can predict with optimal accuracy the probability of not removing the entire kidney.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cei
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
| | - Giuseppe Rosiello
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Basile
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Musso
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Re
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Fallara
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Belladelli
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Brembilla
- University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Francesco De Cobelli
- University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Marandino
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Salonia
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Bertini
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology; URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Longoni M, Scilipoti P, Re C, Rosiello G, Nocera L, Pellegrino F, Basile G, de Angelis M, Quarta L, Burgio G, Necchi A, Cigliola A, Chiti A, Picchio M, Salonia A, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Moschini M. Use of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT for lymph node assessment before radical cystectomy in bladder cancer patients. BJU Int 2024. [PMID: 38621771 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomograpy (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in nodal staging before radical cystectomy (RC) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) for bladder cancer (BCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS This analysis was based on a cohort of 199 BCa patients undergoing RC and bilateral PLND between 2015 and 2022. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or immunotherapy (NAI) was administered after oncological evaluation. All patients received preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT to assess extravesical disease. Point estimates for true negative, false negative, false positive, true positive, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of conventional imaging and PET/CT were calculated. Subgroup analysis in patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment was performed. RESULTS At preoperative evaluation, 30 patients (15.1%) had 48 suspicious nodal spots on 18F-FDG PET/CT. At RC and bilateral PLND, a total of 4871 lymph nodes (LNs) were removed with 237 node metastases corresponding to 126 different regions. Pathological node metastases were found in 17/30 (57%) vs 39/169 patients (23%) with suspicious vs negative preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT, respectively (sensitivity = 0.30, specificity = 0.91, PPV = 0.57, NPV = 0.77, accuracy = 0.74). On per-region analysis including 1367 nodal regions, LN involvement was found in 19/48 (39%) vs 105/1319 (8%) suspicious vs negative regions at PET/CT, respectively (sensitivity = 0.15, specificity = 0.98, PPV = 0.40, NPV = 0.92, ACC = 0.90). Similar results were observed for patients receiving NAC (n = 44, 32.1%) and NAI (n = 93, 67.9% [per-patient: sensitivity = 0.36, specificity = 0.91, PPV = 0.59, NPV = 0.80, accuracy = 0.77; per-region: sensitivity = 0.12, specificity = 0.98, PPV = 0.32, NPV = 0.93, ACC = 0.91]). Study limitations include its retrospective design and limited patient numbers. CONCLUSIONS In eight out of 10 patients with negative preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT, pN0 disease was confirmed at final pathology. No differences were found based on NAC vs NAI treatment. These findings suggest that 18F-FDG PET/CT could play a role in the preoperative evaluation of nodal metastases in BCa patients, although its cost-effectiveness is uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattia Longoni
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Scilipoti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Re
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Rosiello
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Nocera
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Pellegrino
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Basile
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Leonardo Quarta
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giusy Burgio
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Cigliola
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Picchio
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Salonia
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cannoletta D, Pettenuzzo G, Pellegrino A, Morgantini LA, Sauer R, Torres-Anguiano JR, Mazzone E, Antonelli A, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Crivellaro S. Versatility of Single Port Retroperitoneal Low Anterior Access: early outcomes in multiple procedures. J Endourol 2024. [PMID: 38613809 DOI: 10.1089/end.2024.0046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/15/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to assess early outcomes of the single-port (SP) robotic Low Anterior Access (LAA) for all upper urinary tract surgeries. Additionally, it aimed to explore the impact of clinical factors, notably Body Mass Index (BMI), on post-operative outcomes and length of hospital stay. MATERIALS AND METHODS Overall, 76 consecutive patients underwent SP robotic surgery with LAA involving all upper urinary tract pathologies, with data collected prospectively. Baseline characteristics, intra- and post-operative outcomes, pain levels, and opioid use were analyzed. Statistical methods, including logistic regression and locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) analysis, were used to assess same-day discharge (SDD) predictors and the association between BMI and same-day discharge probability. According to the Institutional Review Board (IRB) protocol, only data recorded in our electronic medical record system were included. RESULTS Ten different procedures were performed with LAA, with no need for conversion to open surgery and complication rates in line with the literature (30-days: 5%, 90-days: 6.6%). Notably, 77.6% of patients were discharged on the same day. A significant association was found between BMI and prolonged hospital stay, particularly in obese patients (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). Post-operative pain was generally low (median VAS: 4), with over 70% discharged without opioid prescriptions. CONCLUSION The novel LAA is a versatile approach for various upper urinary tract surgeries, even in obese patients. While achieving satisfactory post-operative outcomes, increased BMI correlated with a reduced likelihood of same-day discharge. Further studies, including larger cohorts and multicenter collaborations, are warranted to explore anesthesiologic management and validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donato Cannoletta
- IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 9372, Via Olgettina, 60, Milano, Italy, 20132;
| | | | | | - Luca A Morgantini
- University of Illinois at Chicago, 14681, Urology, 820South Wood Street, Rm 515 CSN, Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
- University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, 614414, Urology, Chicago, United States, 60612-7337;
| | - Ruben Sauer
- University of Illinois Chicago, 14681, Chicago, Illinois, United States;
| | | | - Elio Mazzone
- Ospedale San Raffaele, 9372, Via Olgettina, Milano, Italy, 20132;
| | | | | | | | - Simone Crivellaro
- University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, 12247, Urology, Chicago, Illinois, United States;
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Morra S, Scheipner L, Baudo A, Jannello LMI, de Angelis M, Siech C, Goyal JA, Touma N, Tian Z, Saad F, Shariat SF, Creta M, Califano G, Celentano G, Colla' Ruvolo C, Ahyai S, Carmignani L, de Cobelli O, Musi G, Briganti A, Chun FKH, Longo N, Karakiewicz PI. Contemporary conditional cancer-specific survival rates in surgically treated nonmetastatic primary urethral carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2024. [PMID: 38606531 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We examined the effect of disease-free interval (DFI) duration on cancer-specific mortality (CSM)-free survival, otherwise known as the effect of conditional survival, in radical urethrectomy nonmetastatic primary urethral carcinoma (PUC) patients. METHODS Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database 2000-2020, patient (age, sex, race/ethnicity, and marital status) and tumor (stage and histology) characteristics, as well as systemic therapy exposure status of nonmetastatic PUC patients were tabulated. Conditional survival estimates at 5-year were assessed based on DFI duration and according to stage at presentation (T1 -2N0 vs. T3-4N0-2). RESULTS Of all 512 radical urethrectomy PUC patients, 278 (54%) harbored T1-2N0 stage versus 234 (46%) harbored T3-4N0-2 stage. In 512 PUC patients, 5-year CSM-free survival at initial diagnosis was 61.8%. Provided a DFI duration of 36 months, 5-year CSM-free survival was 85.6%. In 278 T1-2N0 PUC patients, 5-year CSM-free survival at initial diagnosis was 68.4%. Provided a DFI duration of 36 months, 5-year CSM-free survival was 86.9%. In 234 T3-4N0-2 PUC patients, 5-year CSM-free survival at initial diagnosis was 53.8%. Provided a DFI duration of 36 months, 5-year CSM-free survival was 83.6%. CONCLUSIONS Although intuitively, clinicians and patients are well aware of the concept that increasing DFI duration improves survival probability, only a few clinicians can accurately estimate the magnitude of survival improvement, as was done within the current study. Such information is crucial to survivors, especially in those diagnosed with rare malignancies, where the survival estimation according to DFI duration is even more challenging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Morra
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Lukas Scheipner
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Letizia M I Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Nawar Touma
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Hourani Center of Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Massimiliano Creta
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Califano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Celentano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Claudia Colla' Ruvolo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Baudo A, Piccinelli ML, Incesu RB, Morra S, Scheipner L, Barletta F, Tappero S, Garcia CC, Assad A, Tian Z, Acquati P, de Cobelli O, Longo N, Briganti A, Terrone C, Chun FKH, Tilki D, Ahyai S, Saad F, Shariat SF, Carmignani L, Karakiewicz PI. Surgically treated pelvic liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma: The effect of tumor size on cancer-specific survival. Surg Oncol 2024; 54:102074. [PMID: 38615387 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In soft tissue pelvic liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma, it is unknown whether a specific tumor size cut-off may help to better predict prognosis, defined as cancer-specific survival (CSS). We tested whether different tumor size cut-offs, could improve CSS prediction. MATERIALS AND METHODS Surgically treated non-metastatic soft tissue pelvic sarcoma patients were identified (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 2004-2019). Kaplan-Meier plots, univariable and multivariable Cox-regression models and receiver operating characteristic-derived area under the curve (AUC) estimates were used. RESULTS Overall, 672 (65 %) liposarcoma (median tumor size 11 cm, interquartile range [IQR] 7-16) and 367 (35 %) leiomyosarcoma (median tumor size 8 cm, IQR 5-12) patients were identified. The p-value derived ideal tumor size cut-off was 17.1 cm, in liposarcoma and 7.0 cm, in leiomyosarcoma. In liposarcoma, according to p-value derived cut-off, five-year CSS rates were 92 vs 83 % (≤17.1 vs > 17.1 cm). This cut-off represented an independent predictor of CSS and improved prognostic ability from 83.8 to 86.8 % (Δ = 3 %). Similarly, among previously established cut-offs (5 vs 10 vs 15 cm), also 15 cm represented an independent predictor of CSS and improved prognostic ability from 83.8 to 87.0 % (Δ = 3.2 %). In leiomyosarcoma, according to p-value derived cut-off, five-year CSS rates were 86 vs 55 % (≤7.0 vs > 7.0 cm). This cut-off represented an independent predictor of CSS and improved prognostic ability from 68.6 to 76.5 % (Δ = 7.9 %). CONCLUSIONS In liposarcoma, the p-value derived tumor size cut-off was 17.1 cm vs 7.0 cm, in leiomyosarcoma. In both histologic subtypes, these cut-offs exhibited the optimal statistical characteristics (univariable, multivariable and AUC analyses). In liposarcoma, the 15 cm cut-off represented a valuable alternative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
| | - Mattia Luca Piccinelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Reha-Baris Incesu
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Simone Morra
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Lukas Scheipner
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Tappero
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Cristina Cano Garcia
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Anis Assad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Pietro Acquati
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Terrone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Hourani Center of Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Robesti D, Gallina A, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Fossati N. Role of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy in men with oligometastatic prostate cancer on molecular imaging. Curr Opin Urol 2024:00042307-990000000-00150. [PMID: 38587018 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The implementation of PET with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) tracer as primary staging tool occurred recently. Since its introduction, a novel category of patients emerged, with negative staging at conventional imaging, and positive molecular imaging. Local treatment in these patients might be associated with improved oncological outcomes when combined with systemic therapy. However, its impact on oligometastatic prostate cancer (omPCa) remains unknown. In this review, we aimed at investigating the role of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy (cRP) in oligometastatic disease at molecular imaging. RECENT FINDINGS After comprehensive review of literature, two retrospective studies highlighted the feasibility, safety, and potential benefits of surgery in omPCA patients at molecular imaging. They showed that 72% of patients achieved PSA less than 0.01 ng/ml following cRP as part of a multimodal approach, 17% experienced radiographic progression, and 7% died at 27-month median follow-up. Moreover, complications postcRP after PSMA PET were modest, with a 40% rate of any adverse event, and 5% of grade more than 3. The 1-year urinary continence after cRP rate was 82%. The oncological, functional outcomes and the complication rate aligned with those observed in series of cRP after conventional imaging. SUMMARY cRP is feasible, well tolerated, and effective in selected patients with omPCa at PSMA PET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Robesti
- IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Gallina
- Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Department of Surgery - Urology Service, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Department of Surgery - Urology Service, Lugano, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Montorsi F, Moschini M, de Angelis M, Briganti A, Gallina A, Suardi N, Dehò F. Re: Narek Shaverdian and Reshma Jagsi. When Headlines Harm Patients With Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2023;9:1611-2. Eur Urol Focus 2024:S2405-4569(24)00052-X. [PMID: 38582642 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Gallina
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Civico Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Nazareno Suardi
- Department of Urology, Spedali Civili Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Federico Dehò
- Department of Urology, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi-ASST Sette Laghi, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chiarelli G, Stephens A, Finati M, Cirulli GO, Beatrici E, Filipas DK, Arora S, Tinsley S, Bhandari M, Carrieri G, Trinh QD, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Lughezzani G, Buffi N, Rogers C, Abdollah F. Adequacy of prostate cancer prevention and screening recommendations provided by an artificial intelligence-powered large language model. Int Urol Nephrol 2024:10.1007/s11255-024-04009-5. [PMID: 38564079 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-024-04009-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to assess the appropriateness of ChatGPT in providing answers related to prostate cancer (PCa) screening, comparing GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. METHODS A committee of five reviewers designed 30 questions related to PCa screening, categorized into three difficulty levels. The questions were formulated identically for both GPTs three times, varying the prompts. Each reviewer assigned a score for accuracy, clarity, and conciseness. The readability was assessed by the Flesch Kincaid Grade (FKG) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE). The mean scores were extracted and compared using the Wilcoxon test. We compared the readability across the three different prompts by ANOVA. RESULTS In GPT-3.5 the mean score (SD) for accuracy, clarity, and conciseness was 1.5 (0.59), 1.7 (0.45), 1.7 (0.49), respectively for easy questions; 1.3 (0.67), 1.6 (0.69), 1.3 (0.65) for medium; 1.3 (0.62), 1.6 (0.56), 1.4 (0.56) for hard. In GPT-4 was 2.0 (0), 2.0 (0), 2.0 (0.14), respectively for easy questions; 1.7 (0.66), 1.8 (0.61), 1.7 (0.64) for medium; 2.0 (0.24), 1.8 (0.37), 1.9 (0.27) for hard. GPT-4 performed better for all three qualities and difficulty levels than GPT-3.5. The FKG mean for GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 answers were 12.8 (1.75) and 10.8 (1.72), respectively; the FRE for GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 was 37.3 (9.65) and 47.6 (9.88), respectively. The 2nd prompt has achieved better results in terms of clarity (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS GPT-4 displayed superior accuracy, clarity, conciseness, and readability than GPT-3.5. Though prompts influenced the quality response in both GPTs, their impact was significant only for clarity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Chiarelli
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alex Stephens
- Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Marco Finati
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ottone Cirulli
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Edoardo Beatrici
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Dejan K Filipas
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sohrab Arora
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - Shane Tinsley
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - Mahendra Bhandari
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - Giuseppe Carrieri
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Lughezzani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicolò Buffi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Craig Rogers
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - Firas Abdollah
- VUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Piramide F, Turri F, Amparore D, Fallara G, De Groote R, Knipper S, Wuernschimmel C, Bravi CA, Lambert E, Di Maida F, Liakos N, Pellegrino F, Andras I, Mastrorosa A, Tillu N, Mastroianni R, Paciotti M, Wenzel M, Bianchi R, di Trapani E, Moschovas MC, Gandaglia G, Moschini M, D'Hondt F, Rocco B, Fiori C, Galfano A, Minervini A, Simone G, Briganti A, De Cobelli O, Gaston R, Montorsi F, Breda A, Wiklund P, Porpiglia F, Mottrie A, Larcher A, Dell'Oglio P. Atlas of Intracorporeal Orthotopic Neobladder Techniques After Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy and Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes. Eur Urol 2024; 85:348-360. [PMID: 38044179 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple and heterogeneous techniques have been described for orthotopic neobladder (ONB) reconstruction after robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Nonetheless, a systematic assessment of all the available options is lacking. OBJECTIVE To provide the first comprehensive step-by-step description of all the available techniques for robotic intracorporeal ONB together with individual intraoperative, perioperative and functional outcomes based on a systematic review of the literature. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We performed a systematic review of the literature, and MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify original articles describing different robotic intracorporeal ONB techniques and reporting intra- and perioperative outcomes. Studies were categorized according to ONB type, providing a synthesis of the current evidence. Video material was provided by experts in the field to illustrate the surgical technique of each intracorporeal ONB. SURGICAL PROCEDURE Nine different ONB types were identified: Studer, Hautmann, Y shape, U shape, Bordeaux, Pyramid, Shell, Florence Robotic Intracorporeal Neobladder, and Padua Ileal Neobladder. MEASUREMENTS Continuous and categorical variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation and as frequencies and proportions, respectively. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Of 2587 studies identified, 19 met our inclusion criteria. No cohort studies or randomized control trials comparing different neobladder types are available. Available techniques for intracorporeal robotic ONB reconstruction have similar operative time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative complications, and length of stay. Major variability exists concerning postoperative complications and functional outcomes, likely related to reporting bias. CONCLUSIONS Several techniques are described for intracorporeal ONB during robot-assisted radical cystectomy with comparable perioperative outcomes. We provide the first step-by-step surgical atlas for robot-assisted ONB reconstruction. Further comparative studies are needed to assess any advantage of one technique over others. PATIENT SUMMARY Patients elected for radical cystectomy should be aware that multiple techniques for robotic orthotopic neobladder are available, but that current evidence does not favor one type over the others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Piramide
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Department of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium.
| | - Filippo Turri
- Department of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Fallara
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ruben De Groote
- Department of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Sophie Knipper
- Department of Urology, Vivantes Klinikum am Urban, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Carlo Andrea Bravi
- Department of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium; Department of Urology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Edward Lambert
- Department of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Fabrizio Di Maida
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Nikolaos Liakos
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty and Medical Centre of the University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Francesco Pellegrino
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Iulia Andras
- Department of Urology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Alessandro Mastrorosa
- Unit of Urology, Clinique Saint-Augustin, Bordeaux, France; Urology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Neeraja Tillu
- Department of Urology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Riccardo Mastroianni
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Paciotti
- Department of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Mike Wenzel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Roberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ettore di Trapani
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Bernando Rocco
- Department of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Antonio Galfano
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Richard Gaston
- Unit of Urology, Clinique Saint-Augustin, Bordeaux, France
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Fundaciò Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Peter Wiklund
- Department of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Department of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Dell'Oglio
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mazzone E, Gandaglia G, Robesti D, Rajwa P, Gomez Rivas J, Ibáñez L, Soeterik TFW, Bianchi L, Afferi L, Kesch C, Darr C, Guo H, Zhuang J, Zattoni F, Fendler WP, Amparore D, Huebner NA, Giesen A, Joniau S, Schiavina R, Brunocilla E, Mattei A, Dal Moro F, Moreno Sierra J, Porpiglia F, Picchio M, Chiti A, van den Bergh R, Shariat SF, Montorsi F, Briganti A. Which Patients with Prostate Cancer and Lymph Node Uptake at Preoperative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography Scan Are at a Higher Risk of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy? Identifying Indicators of Systemic Disease by Integrating Clinical, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Functional Imaging Parameters. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:231-240. [PMID: 37689506 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of local therapies including radical prostatectomy (RP) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with clinical lymphadenopathies on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) has scarcely been explored. Limited data are available to identify men who would benefit from RP; on the contrary, those more likely to benefit already have systemic disease. OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess the predictors of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence in surgically managed PCa patients with lymphadenopathies on a PSMA PET/CT scan by integrating clinical, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and PSMA PET/CT parameters. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We identified 519 patients treated with RP and extended lymph node dissection, and who received preoperative PSMA PET between 2017 and 2022 in nine referral centers. Among them, we selected 88 patients with nodal uptake at preoperative PSMA PET (miTxN1M0). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The outcome was PSA persistence, defined as a PSA value of ≥0.1 ng/ml at the first measurement after surgery. Multivariable logistic regression models tested the predictors of PSA persistence. Covariates consisted of biopsy International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group, clinical stage at MRI, and number of positive spots at a PET/CT scan. A regression tree analysis stratified patients into risk groups based on preoperative characteristics. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, lymph node invasion (LNI) was detected in 63 patients (72%) and 32 (36%) experienced PSA persistence after RP. At multivariable analyses, having more than two lymph nodal positive findings at PSMA PET, seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) at MRI, and ISUP grade group >3 at biopsy were independent predictors of PSA persistence (all p < 0.05). At the regression tree analysis, patients were stratified in four risk groups according to biopsy ISUP grade, number of positive findings at PET/CT, and clinical stage at MRI. The model depicted good discrimination at internal validation (area under the curve 78%). CONCLUSIONS One out of three miN1M0 patients showed PSA persistence after surgery. Patients with ISUP grade 2-3, as well as patients with organ-confined disease at MRI and a single or two positive nodal findings at PET are those in whom RP may achieve the best oncological outcomes in the context of a multimodal approach. Conversely, patients with a high ISUP grade and extracapsular extension or SVI or more than two spots at PSMA PET should be considered as potentially affected by systemic disease upfront. PATIENT SUMMARY Our novel and straightforward risk classification integrates currently available preoperative risk tools and should, therefore, assist physician in preoperative counseling of men candidates for radical treatment for prostate cancer with positive lymph node uptake at prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elio Mazzone
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Robesti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Juan Gomez Rivas
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Ibáñez
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Timo F W Soeterik
- Department of Urology, St Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lorenzo Bianchi
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Luca Afferi
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Claudia Kesch
- Department of Urology, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christopher Darr
- Department of Urology, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Hongqian Guo
- Department of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, China
| | - Junlong Zhuang
- Department of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, China
| | - Fabio Zattoni
- Department Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg, Essen, Germany
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Nicolai A Huebner
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexander Giesen
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Eugenio Brunocilla
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Agostino Mattei
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Fabrizio Dal Moro
- Department Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Maria Picchio
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Vitale V, Bindi F, Briganti A, Bonelli F, Parietti C, Sgorbini M. Evaluation of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from donkeys using four different cytological stains: A pilot study. J Equine Vet Sci 2024; 135:105035. [PMID: 38423373 DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) cytology is used for the diagnosis of non-infectious lower airway inflammation in equids. Discrepancies have been reported in the differential cell count when different staining methods were used both in humans and horses. The objective of this study was to compare the results of BALF cytology in donkeys using four different staining methods: modified May-Grunwald Giemsa (mMGG), Diff-Quick (DQ), Toluidine blue (TB) and Perls Prussian blue (PPB). Nine healthy Amiata female donkeys were enrolled. The BAL procedure was performed as previously described and pairs of cytocentrifuged BALF slides were stained with each method. No differences between mMGG and DQ were found for macrophages, neutrophils, and eosinophils, while differences were found in mast cell count between DQ vs.TB, but not between mMGG vs. DQ or mMGG vs. TB. Finally, no differences were obtained in the differential count for hemosiderophages comparing mMGG, DQ and PPB. The mMGG appears to be an excellent stain for the identification of all possible cell types, including mast cells in the BALF of donkeys. DQ, if used alone, may lead to inappropriate identification of mast cells. These results are consistent with the literature on BALF staining methods in horses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Vitale
- Universidad CEU-Cardenal Herrera, CEU Universities, 46115 Alfara del Patriarca, Valencia, Spain.
| | - F Bindi
- Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, 56122 San Piero a Grado, Pisa, Italy
| | - A Briganti
- Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, 56122 San Piero a Grado, Pisa, Italy
| | - F Bonelli
- Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, 56122 San Piero a Grado, Pisa, Italy
| | - C Parietti
- Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, 56122 San Piero a Grado, Pisa, Italy
| | - M Sgorbini
- Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, 56122 San Piero a Grado, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pellegrino F, Stabile A, Sorce G, Mazzone E, Cannoletta D, Cirulli GO, Quarta L, Leni R, Robesti D, Brembilla G, Gandaglia G, De Cobelli F, Montorsi F, Briganti A. Variability of mpMRI diagnostic performance according to the upfront individual patient risk of having clinically significant prostate cancer. Prostate 2024; 84:473-478. [PMID: 38149793 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the variation of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) positive predictive value (PPV) according to each patient's risk of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) based exclusively on clinical factors. METHODS We evaluated 999 patients with positive mpMRI (PI-RADS ≥ 3) receiving targeted (TBx) plus systematic prostate biopsy. We built a multivariable logistic regression analysis (MVA) using clinical risk factors to calculate the individual patients' risk of harboring csPCa at TBx. A second MVA tested the association between individual patients' clinical risk and mpMRI PPV accounting for the PI-RADS score. Finally, we plotted the PPV of each PI-RADS score by the individual patient pretest probability of csPCa using a LOWESS approach. RESULTS Overall, TBx found csPCa in 21%, 51%, and 80% of patients with PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions, respectively. At MVA, age, PSA, digital rectal examination (DRE), and prostate volume were significantly associated with the risk of csPCa at biopsy. DRE yielded the highest odds ratio (OR: 2.88; p < 0.001). The individual patient's clinical risk was significantly associated with mpMRI PPV (OR: 2.49; p < 0.001) using MVA. Plotting the mpMRI PPV according to the predicted clinical risks, we observed that for patients with clinical risk close to 0 versus patients with risk higher than 90%, the mpMRI PPV of PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 ranged from 0% to 75%, from 0% to 96%, and from 45% to 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION mpMRI PPV varies according to the individual pretest patient's risk based on clinical factors. These findings should be considered in the decision-making process for patients with suspect MRI findings referred for a prostate biopsy. Moreover, our data support the need for further studies to create an individualized risk prediction tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Pellegrino
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriele Sorce
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Donato Cannoletta
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ottone Cirulli
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Leonardo Quarta
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Leni
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Robesti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Brembilla
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco De Cobelli
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Scheipner L, Incesu RB, Morra S, Baudo A, Assad A, Jannello LMI, Siech C, de Angelis M, Tian Z, Saad F, Shariat SF, Briganti A, Chun FKH, Tilki D, Longo N, Carmignani L, De Cobelli O, Pichler M, Ahyai S, Karakiewicz PI. Prognostic Significance of Radiographic Lymph Node Invasion in Contemporary Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:164-170. [PMID: 37981546 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To test the prognostic significance of radiographic cN-stage in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients with low metastatic burden (1 site of metastasis), relying on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER 2010-2020). METHODS Included were mRCC patients with 1 site of metastasis, treated with systemic therapy without cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN). Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox-regression models addressed cancer-specific mortality (CSM) according to radiographic cN-stage (ccN1 vs. ccN0). Separate subgroup analyses were performed, addressing radiographic N-stage in patients with distinct histology (clear-cell vs. RCC not otherwise specified [RCC NOS]). RESULTS Of 1756 mRCC patients, 545 (31%) were radiographic cN1. Overall, the median CSM-free survival of the cohort was 11 months. Median CSM-free survival was 8 vs. 14 months in radiographic cN1 vs. cN0 mRCC patients (HR 1.49, P < .0001). In multivariable Cox regression analyses, radiographic cN1 status was an independent predictor of higher CSM (HR 1.39; P = .01). In subgroup analyses, addressing patients with clear-cell histology and patients with RCC NOS separately, radiographic cN1 status remained independently associated with a higher CSM in both groups (clear-cell: HR 1.36; P = .03; RCC NOS: HR 2.06; P = .009). CONCLUSION In mRCC patients with low metastatic burden, presence or absence of radiographic lymph node invasion results in a clinically meaningful discrimination between those with poor prognosis and others. In consequence, consideration of radiographic lymph node invasion might be of great value in this specific population of mRCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Scheipner
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
| | - Reha-Baris Incesu
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Simone Morra
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Anis Assad
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Carolin Siech
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Martin Pichler
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Department of Hematology and Oncology, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Siech C, Incesu RB, Morra S, Scheipner L, Baudo A, Jannello LMI, de Angelis M, Goyal JA, Tian Z, Saad F, Shariat SF, Tilki D, Longo N, Carmignani L, de Cobelli O, Ahyai S, Briganti A, Mandel P, Kluth LA, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. Differences in other-cause mortality in metastatic renal cell carcinoma according to partial vs. radical nephrectomy and age: A propensity score matched study. Surg Oncol 2024; 53:102047. [PMID: 38359547 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION It is unknown whether the benefit from partial nephrectomy regarding lower other-cause mortality is applicable to older patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database, patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, undergoing partial or radical nephrectomy, were stratified according to age (<60, 60-69, and ≥70 years). After propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and multivariable Cox regression models were used. RESULTS Of 2,390 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, 885 (37%) were aged <60 years, and 90 (10%) underwent partial nephrectomy; 824 (34%) were aged 60-69 years, and 61 (7%) underwent partial nephrectomy; and 681 (29%) were aged ≥70 years, and 64 (9%) underwent partial nephrectomy. After propensity score matching, in patients aged <60 years, partial nephrectomy was associated with lower other-cause mortality (hazard ratio 0.22; p = 0.02); in patients aged 60-69 years, partial nephrectomy was associated with lower other-cause mortality (hazard ratio 0.38; p = 0.03); but not in patients aged ≥70 years. DISCUSSION In metastatic renal cell carcinoma, partial nephrectomy is associated with lower other-cause mortality in patients aged <60 years and in patients aged 60-69 years, but not in patients aged ≥70 years. In consequence, consideration of partial nephrectomy might be of great value in younger metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Reha-Baris Incesu
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Simone Morra
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Lukas Scheipner
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Siech C, Morra S, Scheipner L, Baudo A, Jannello LMI, de Angelis M, Goyal JA, Tian Z, Saad F, Shariat SF, Longo N, Carmignani L, de Cobelli O, Ahyai S, Briganti A, Mandel P, Kluth LA, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. Married Status Affects Rates of Treatment and Mortality in Male and Female Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Across all Stages. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:593-598. [PMID: 38369387 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The association between treatment rates and cancer specific mortality (CSM) according to married status in male and female clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients across all stages is unknown. PATIENT AND METHODS Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2020), ccRCC patients were stratified according to married status (married vs. unmarried). Logistic regression models addressed treatment rates; Cox regression models addressed CSM rates. RESULTS Of 98,142 patients, 43,999 (72%) males and 20,287 (55%) females were married. In stage-specific analyses, married status independently predicted higher nephrectomy rates in males and females (all P ≤ .03). In stage IV, married status predicted higher systemic therapy rate in males (P < .001), but not in females. In survival analyses, married males exhibited lower CSM rates relative to unmarried males (all P ≤ .02). Conversely, married females exhibited lower CSM rates only in stages I and III (all P ≤ .02), but not in stages II and IV. In subgroup analyses of T1aN0M0 patients, married status was associated with higher partial nephrectomy rates in both males and females (all P ≤ .005). CONCLUSION In ccRCC, married status invariably predicts higher rates of guideline recommended surgical management (nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy). Moreover, even after adjustment for treatment type, married status independently predicted lower CSM rates in males across all stages. However, the effect of married status in females is only operational in stages I and III. Lack of association between married status in stages II and IV may potentially be explained by stronger association with treatment assignment which reduces the residual effect on survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Simone Morra
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Lukas Scheipner
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Letizia M I Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Beyer K, Lawlor A, Remmers S, Bezuidenhout C, Gómez Rivas J, Venderbos LD, Smith EJ, Gandaglia G, MacLennan S, MacLennan SJ, Bjartell A, Briganti A, Cornford P, Evans-Axelsson S, Ribal MJ, N'Dow J, Briers E, Roobol MJ, Van Hemelrijck M. How Can We Improve Patient-Clinician Communication for Men Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer? EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 62:1-7. [PMID: 38585208 PMCID: PMC10998269 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective The ability of health care professionals to communicate with patients compassionately and effectively is crucial for shared decision-making, but little research has investigated patient-clinician communication. As part of PIONEER-an international Big Data Consortium led by the European Association of Urology to answer key questions for men with prostate cancer (PCa), funded through the IMI2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement 777492- we investigated communication between men diagnosed with PCa and the health care professional(s) treating them across Europe. Methods We used the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Communication 26, which was shared via the PIONEER and patient organisations on March 11, 2022. We sought men who spoke French, Italian, Spanish, German, Dutch, or English who were diagnosed with PCa and were undergoing or had already received treatment for their PCa. Results and limitations A total of 372 men reported that they communicated with their clinician during either the diagnostic or the treatment period. Overall, the majority of participants reported positive experiences. However, important opportunities to enhance communication were identified, particularly with regard to correcting misunderstandings, understanding the patient's preferred approach to information presentation, addressing challenging questions, supporting the patient's comprehension of information, attending to the patient's emotional needs, and assessing what information had already been given to patients about their disease and treatment, and how much of it was understood. Conclusions and clinical implications These results help us to identify gaps and barriers to shared treatment decision making. This knowledge will help devise measures to improve patient-health care professional communication in the PCa setting. Patient summary As part of the PIONEER initiative, we investigated the communication between men diagnosed with prostate cancer and their health care professionals across Europe. A total of 372 men from six different countries participated in the study. Most participants reported positive experiences, but areas where communication could be improved were identified. These included addressing misunderstandings, tailoring the presentation of information to the patient's preferences, handling difficult questions, supporting emotional needs, and assessing the patient's understanding of their diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Beyer
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ailbhe Lawlor
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Sebastiaan Remmers
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carla Bezuidenhout
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Juan Gómez Rivas
- Department of Urology, Clínico San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lionne D.F. Venderbos
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma J. Smith
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Department of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Steven MacLennan
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland
| | | | - Anders Bjartell
- Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Philip Cornford
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Maria J. Ribal
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - James N'Dow
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | | | - Monique J. Roobol
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - for the PIONEER Consortium
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research, King’s College London, London, UK
- European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Clínico San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland
- Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Medical Affairs Oncology, Bayer AB, Stockholm, Sweden
- Patient advocate, Hasselt, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Panebianco V, Briganti A, Boellaard TN, Catto J, Comperat E, Efstathiou J, van der Heijden AG, Giannarini G, Girometti R, Mertens L, Takeuchi M, Muglia VF, Narumi Y, Novara G, Pecoraro M, Roupret M, Sanguedolce F, Santini D, Shariat SF, Simone G, Vargas HA, Woo S, Barentsz J, Witjes JA. Clinical application of bladder MRI and the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System. Nat Rev Urol 2024; 21:243-251. [PMID: 38036666 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-023-00830-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
Diagnostic work-up and risk stratification in patients with bladder cancer before and after treatment must be refined to optimize management and improve outcomes. MRI has been suggested as a non-invasive technique for bladder cancer staging and assessment of response to systemic therapy. The Vesical Imaging-Reporting And Data System (VI-RADS) was developed to standardize bladder MRI image acquisition, interpretation and reporting and enables accurate prediction of muscle-wall invasion of bladder cancer. MRI is available in many centres but is not yet recommended as a first-line test for bladder cancer owing to a lack of high-quality evidence. Consensus-based evidence on the use of MRI-VI-RADS for bladder cancer care is needed to serve as a benchmark for formulating guidelines and research agendas until further evidence from randomized trials becomes available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Panebianco
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Thierry N Boellaard
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - James Catto
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Eva Comperat
- Department of Pathology, Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hopital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - Jason Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Gianluca Giannarini
- Urology Unit, Academic Medical Centre "Santa Maria della Misericordia", Udine, Italy
| | - Rossano Girometti
- Institute of Radiology, Academic Medical Centre "Santa Maria della Misericordia", Udine, Italy
| | - Laura Mertens
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Valdair F Muglia
- Department of Medical Images, Radiation Therapy and Oncohematology, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
| | | | - Giacomo Novara
- Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology - Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Martina Pecoraro
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Morgan Roupret
- Department of Urology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Francesco Sanguedolce
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Daniele Santini
- Division of Medical Oncology A, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University, Latina, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Rome, Italy
| | - Hebert A Vargas
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sungmin Woo
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jelle Barentsz
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Incesu RB, Barletta F, Garcia CC, Scheipner L, Morra S, Baudo A, Assad A, Tian Z, Saad F, Shariat SF, Carmignani L, Longo N, Ahyai S, Chun FKH, Briganti A, Tilki D, Graefen M, Karakiewicz PI. The Effect of Treatment Intensification on Other-Cause Mortality in Clear-Cell Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:420-425. [PMID: 38307818 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Revised: 12/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of treatment intensification (systemic therapy [ST] + cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) vs. ST alone) is unknown regarding rates of other-cause mortality (OCM) in clear-cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma (ccmRCC). We hypothesized that intensified treatment (ST + CN) may result in higher OCM, than when ST is used alone. METHODS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, all ccmRCC patients treated 2010-2018 either with ST + CN or ST alone were identified. Propensity score matching (PSM), cumulative incidence plots, multivariable competing risks regression analyses and 6 months' landmark analyses addressed OCM and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) according to treatment status. RESULTS Of 2271 ccmRCC patients, 1233 (54%) were treated with ST + CN vs 1038 (46%) with ST alone. After 1:1 PSM, OCM was 5.3 vs. 4.6 % (P = .5) and CSM was 73.4 vs. 88.4% (P < .001) in ST + CN vs. ST alone patients. In multivariable competing risks regression, the combination of ST and CN was not associated with higher OCM (HR 1.3; 95% CI 0.8-2.1; P = .4), vs. ST alone. However, the combination of ST and CN was independently associated with lower CSM (HR 0.5; 95% CI 0.5-0.6; P < .001), vs. ST alone. After 6 months' landmark analyses, these multivariable associations remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS The current study indicates no OCM-disadvantage in ST + CN ccmRCC patients, relative to their ST alone counterparts. Conversely, a strong association with lower CSM was recorded in ST + CN patients, relative to their ST alone counterparts. These associations are robust and remained unchanged after strictest statistical adjustment including control for immortal time bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reha-Baris Incesu
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Cano Garcia
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Lukas Scheipner
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Simone Morra
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Anis Assad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Hourani Center of Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Marra G, Rajwa P, Filippini C, Ploussard G, Montefusco G, Puche-Sanz I, Olivier J, Zattoni F, Moro FD, Magli A, Dariane C, Affentranger A, Grogg JB, Hermanns T, Chiu PK, Malkiewicz B, Kowalczyk K, Van den Bergh RCN, Shariat SF, Bianchi A, Antonelli A, Gallina S, Berchiche W, Sanchez-Salas R, Cathelineau X, Afferi L, Fankhauser CD, Mattei A, Karnes RJ, Scuderi S, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Deandreis D, Gontero P, Gandaglia G. The Prognostic Role of Preoperative PSMA PET/CT in cN0M0 pN+ Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:244-251. [PMID: 38155081 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Despite negative preoperative conventional imaging, up to 10% of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) harbor lymph-node involvement (LNI) at radical prostatectomy (RP). The advent of more accurate imaging modalities such as PET/CT improved the detection of LNI. However, their clinical impact and prognostic value are still unclear. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of preoperative PET/CT in patients node positive (pN+) at RP. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We retrospectively identified cN0M0 patients at conventional imaging (CT and/or MRI, and bone scan) who had pN+ PCa at RP at 17 referral centers. Patients with cN+ at PSMA/Choline PET/CT but cN0M0 at conventional imaging were also included. Systemic progression/recurrence was the primary outcome; Cox proportional hazards models were used for multivariate analysis. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We included 1163 pN+ men out of whom 95 and 100 had preoperative PSMA and/or Choline PET/CT, respectively. ISUP grade ≥4 was detected in 66.6%. Overall, 42% of patients had postoperative PSA persistence (≥0.1 ng/mL). Postoperative management included initial observation (34%), ADT (22.7%) and adjuvant RT+/-ADT (42.8%). Median follow-up was 42 months. Patients with cN+ on PSMA PET/CT had an increased risk of systemic progression (52.9% vs. 13.6% cN0 PSMA PET/CT vs. 21.5% cN0 at conventional imaging; P < .01). This held true at multivariable analysis: (HR 6.184, 95% CI: 3.386-11-295; P < .001) whilst no significant results were highlighted for Choline PET/CT. No significant associations for both PET types were found for local progression, BCR, and overall mortality (all P > .05). Observation as an initial management strategy instead of adjuvant treatments was related with an increased risk of metastases (HR 1.808; 95% CI: 1.069-3.058; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS PSMA PET/CT cN+ patients with negative conventional imaging have an increased risk of systemic progression after RP compared to their counterparts with cN0M0 disease both at conventional and/or molecular imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giancarlo Marra
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Claudia Filippini
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Gabriele Montefusco
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Ignacio Puche-Sanz
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain
| | | | - Fabio Zattoni
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Dal Moro
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Alessandro Magli
- Dipartimento di Radioterapia Oncologica, Ospedale Santa Maria della misericordia, Udine, Italia
| | - Charles Dariane
- Department of Urology, Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Peter K Chiu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, SH Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Bartosz Malkiewicz
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Kamil Kowalczyk
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | | | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - William Berchiche
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Rafael Sanchez-Salas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Luca Afferi
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | | | - Agostino Mattei
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | | | - Simone Scuderi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Désirée Deandreis
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Jannello LMI, Morra S, Scheipner L, Baudo A, Siech C, de Angelis M, Touma N, Tian Z, Goyal JA, Luzzago S, Mistretta FA, Piccinelli ML, Saad F, Chun FKH, Briganti A, Ahyai S, Carmignani L, Longo N, de Cobelli O, Musi G, Karakiewicz PI. Multivariable model versus AJCC staging system: cancer-specific survival predictions in adrenocortical carcinoma. Endocr Relat Cancer 2024; 31:e230353. [PMID: 38363202 DOI: 10.1530/erc-23-0353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
We developed a novel contemporary population-based model for predicting cancer-specific survival (CSS) in adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) patients and compared it with the established 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system (AJCC). Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2020), we identified 1056 ACC patients. Univariable Cox regression model addressed CSS. Harrell's concordance index (C-index) quantified accuracy after 2000 bootstrap resamples for internal validation. The multivariable Cox regression model included the most informative, statistically significant predictors. Calibration and decision curve analyses (DCAs) tested the multivariable model as well as AJCC in head-to-head comparisons. Age at diagnosis (>60 vs ≤60 years), surgery, T, N, and M stages were included in the multivariable model. Multivariable model C-index for 3-year CSS prediction was 0.795 vs 0.757 for AJCC. Multivariable model outperformed AJCC in DCAs for the majority of possible CSS-predicted values. Both models exhibited similar calibration properties. Finally, the range of the multivariable model CSS predicted probabilities raged 0.02-75.3% versus only four single AJCC values, specifically 73.2% for stage I, 69.7% for stage II, 46.6% for stage III, and 15.5% for stage IV. The greatest benefit of the multivariable model-generated CSS probabilities applied to AJCC stage I and II patients. The multivariable model was more accurate than AJCC staging when CSS predictions represented the endpoint. Additionally, the multivariable model outperformed AJCC in DCAs. Finally, the AJCC appeared to lag behind the multivariable model when discrimination addressed AJCC stage I and II patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Morra
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Lukas Scheipner
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Nawar Touma
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Stefano Luzzago
- Department of Urology IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco A Mistretta
- Department of Urology IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Luca Piccinelli
- Department of Urology IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Tappero S, Piccinelli ML, Incesu RB, Cano Garcia C, Barletta F, Morra S, Scheipner L, Baudo A, Tian Z, Parodi S, Dell'Oglio P, de Cobelli O, Graefen M, Chun FKH, Briganti A, Longo N, Ahyai S, Carmignani L, Saad F, Shariat SF, Suardi N, Borghesi M, Terrone C, Karakiewicz PI. Overall Survival of Metastatic Prostate Cancer Patients According to Location of Visceral Metastatic Sites. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:47-55.e2. [PMID: 37690970 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION It is unknown whether specific locations of visceral metastatic sites affect overall survival (OS) of metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) patients. We tested the association between specific locations of visceral metastatic sites and OS in mPCa patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Within Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database (2010-2016), survival analyses relied on specific locations of visceral metastases: lung only vs. liver only vs. brain only vs. ≥2 visceral sites. Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox regression models were fitted. RESULTS Of 1827 patients, 1044 (57%) harbored lung only visceral metastases vs. 457 (25%) liver only vs. 131 (7%) brain only vs. 195 (11%) ≥2 visceral sites. Median OS was 22 months in all patients vs. 33 months in lung only vs. 15 months in liver only vs. 16 months in brain only vs. 15 months in patients with ≥2 visceral sites. Highest OS was recorded in lung only visceral metastases patients, especially when concomitant nonvisceral metastases were located in lymph nodes only (median OS 57 months) vs. bone only (26 months) vs. lymph nodes and bone (28 months). Liver only, brain only or ≥2 visceral sites exhibited poor OS, regardless of concomitant nonvisceral metastases type (median OS from 13 to 19 months). CONCLUSION In mPCa patients, lung only visceral metastases, especially when associated with lymph node only nonvisceral metastases, portend the best prognosis. Conversely, visceral metastatic sites other than lung portend poor prognosis, regardless of concomitant nonvisceral metastases type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Tappero
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
| | - Mattia Luca Piccinelli
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Reha-Baris Incesu
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Cristina Cano Garcia
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Morra
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Lukas Scheipner
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Stefano Parodi
- Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Paolo Dell'Oglio
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Nazareno Suardi
- Department of Urology, Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marco Borghesi
- Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Carlo Terrone
- Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Baudo A, Incesu RB, Morra S, Scheipner L, Jannello LMI, de Angelis M, Siech C, Tian Z, Acquati P, Tilki D, Longo N, Ahyai S, de Cobelli O, Briganti A, Chun FKH, Saad F, Shariat SF, Carmignani L, Karakiewicz PI. Other-Cause Mortality, According to Partial vs. Radical Nephrectomy: Age and Stage Analyses. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:181-188. [PMID: 38042729 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We tested the association between other-cause mortality and partial vs. radical nephrectomy in patients with T1a, T1b, and T2 renal cell carcinoma, across all patient ages. MATERIAL AND METHODS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2010-2020), patients with localized renal cell carcinoma stages (T1a-T1b-T2, N0, M0), who underwent partial or radical nephrectomy were identified. Only patients with tumor size 2 to 10 cm were included. Cumulative incidence plots and multivariable competing risks regression models were used. RESULTS Of 68,195 patients, 28,845 (42%) underwent partial nephrectomy vs. 39,350 (58%) radical nephrectomy. In T1a patients, 5-year other-cause mortality rates were 6% for partial nephrectomy vs. 11% for radical nephrectomy (Δ=5%). In T1a patients, partial nephrectomy independently predicted lower other-cause mortality, across all ages (HR: 0.73, P < .001). In age category subgroup analyses addressing T1a patients, in all age categories, partial nephrectomy invariably predicted lower other-cause mortality than radical nephrectomy: ≤59 years (HR: 0.67, P < .001); 60 to 69 years (HR: 0.70, P < .001); and ≥70 years (HR: 0.79, P < .001). Finally, in T1b patients, as well as in T2 patients, no other-cause mortality advantage was recorded for partial vs. radical nephrectomy: T1b (8 vs. 10%, Δ=2%); T2 (8 vs. 9%, Δ=1%). CONCLUSIONS Relative to radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy is associated with lower other-cause mortality in stage T1a renal cell carcinoma patients across all age categories, including the oldest patients. Conversely, no clinically meaningful other-cause mortality benefit was associated with partial nephrectomy in stages T1b or T2, regardless of age, including youngest patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Baudo
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
| | - Reha-Baris Incesu
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Simone Morra
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Lukas Scheipner
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Carolin Siech
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Zhe Tian
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Pietro Acquati
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Fred Saad
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Hourani Center of Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi, Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Division of Urology, Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Incesu RB, Barletta F, Tappero S, Piccinelli ML, Garcia CC, Morra S, Scheipner L, Tian Z, Saad F, Shariat SF, Ahyai S, Longo N, Chun FKH, de Cobelli O, Terrone C, Briganti A, Tilki D, Graefen M, Karakiewicz PI. Survival differences in non-seminoma testis cancer patients according to race/ethnicity. Cancer Epidemiol 2024; 89:102538. [PMID: 38377946 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Historic evidence suggests that non-Caucasian race/ethnicity predisposes to higher testis cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in non-seminoma. However, it is unknown, whether higher CSM in non-Caucasians applies to Hispanics or Asians or African-Americans, or all of the above groups. In contemporary patients, we tested whether CSM is higher in these select non-Caucasian groups than in Caucasians, in overall and in stage-specific comparisons: stage I vs. stage II vs. stage III. METHODS The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2004 -2019) was used. Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression models tested the effect of race/ethnicity on CSM after stratification for stage (I vs. II vs. III) and adjustment for prognosis groups in stage III. RESULTS In all 13,515 non-seminoma patients, CSM in non-Caucasians was invariably higher than in Caucasians. In stage-specific analyses, race/ethnicity represented an independent predictor of CSM in Hispanics in stage I (HR 1.8, p = 0.004), stage II (HR 2.2, p = 0.007) and stage III (HR 1.4, p < 0.001); in African-Americans in stage I (HR 3.2; p = 0.007) and stage III (HR 1.5; p = 0.042); and in Asians in only stage III (HR 1.6, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS In general, CSM is higher in non-Caucasian non-seminoma patients. However, the CSM increase differs according to non-Caucasian race/ethnicity groups. Specifically, higher CSM applies to all stages of non-seminoma in Hispanics, to stages I and III in African-Americans and only to stage III in Asians. These differences are important for individual patient management, as well as for design of prospective trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reha-Baris Incesu
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Tappero
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Mattia Luca Piccinelli
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Cano Garcia
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Simone Morra
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Lukas Scheipner
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Hourani Center of Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Terrone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Englman C, Maffei D, Allen C, Kirkham A, Albertsen P, Kasivisvanathan V, Baroni RH, Briganti A, De Visschere P, Dickinson L, Gómez Rivas J, Haider MA, Kesch C, Loeb S, Macura KJ, Margolis D, Mitra AM, Padhani AR, Panebianco V, Pinto PA, Ploussard G, Puech P, Purysko AS, Radtke JP, Rannikko A, Rastinehad A, Renard-Penna R, Sanguedolce F, Schimmöller L, Schoots IG, Shariat SF, Schieda N, Tempany CM, Turkbey B, Valerio M, Villers A, Walz J, Barrett T, Giganti F, Moore CM. PRECISE Version 2: Updated Recommendations for Reporting Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2024:S0302-2838(24)02232-2. [PMID: 38556436 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation (PRECISE) recommendations standardise the reporting of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer. An international consensus group recently updated these recommendations and identified the areas of uncertainty. METHODS A panel of 38 experts used the formal RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method consensus methodology. Panellists scored 193 statements using a 1-9 agreement scale, where 9 means full agreement. A summary of agreement, uncertainty, or disagreement (derived from the group median score) and consensus (determined using the Interpercentile Range Adjusted for Symmetry method) was calculated for each statement and presented for discussion before individual rescoring. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Participants agreed that MRI scans must meet a minimum image quality standard (median 9) or be given a score of 'X' for insufficient quality. The current scan should be compared with both baseline and previous scans (median 9), with the PRECISE score being the maximum from any lesion (median 8). PRECISE 3 (stable MRI) was subdivided into 3-V (visible) and 3-NonV (nonvisible) disease (median 9). Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System/Likert ≥3 lesions should be measured on T2-weighted imaging, using other sequences to aid in the identification (median 8), and whenever possible, reported pictorially (diagrams, screenshots, or contours; median 9). There was no consensus on how to measure tumour size. More research is needed to determine a significant size increase (median 9). PRECISE 5 was clarified as progression to stage ≥T3a (median 9). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS The updated PRECISE recommendations reflect expert consensus opinion on minimal standards and reporting criteria for prostate MRI in AS. PATIENT SUMMARY The Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation (PRECISE) recommendations are used in clinical practice and research to guide the interpretation and reporting of magnetic resonance imaging for patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer. An international panel has updated these recommendations, clarified the areas of uncertainty, and highlighted the areas for further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron Englman
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Davide Maffei
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Clare Allen
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alex Kirkham
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Peter Albertsen
- Department of Surgery (Urology), UConn Health, Farmington, CT, USA
| | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ronaldo Hueb Baroni
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Pieter De Visschere
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Louise Dickinson
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Juan Gómez Rivas
- Department of Urology, Clinico San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Masoom A Haider
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Claudia Kesch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Stacy Loeb
- Department of Urology and Population Health, New York University Langone Health and Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katarzyna J Macura
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel Margolis
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Department of Radiology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anita M Mitra
- Department of Cancer Services, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Rickmansworth Road, Middlesex, UK
| | - Valeria Panebianco
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Peter A Pinto
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Philippe Puech
- Department of Radiology, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Andrei S Purysko
- Abdominal Imaging Section, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jan Philipp Radtke
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Urology, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Antti Rannikko
- Department of Urology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Art Rastinehad
- Department of Urology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Raphaele Renard-Penna
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Francesco Sanguedolce
- Department of Urology, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, Universitá degli studi di Sassari - Italy
| | - Lars Schimmöller
- Dusseldorf University, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Dusseldorf, Germany; Department of Diagnostic, Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Marien Hospital Herne, University Hospital of the Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Nicola Schieda
- Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Clare M Tempany
- Department of Radiology Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Baris Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Department of Urology, Geneva University Hospital, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Arnauld Villers
- Department of Urology, Hospital Claude Huriez, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | - Jochen Walz
- Department of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | - Tristan Barrett
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrook''s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Francesco Giganti
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Caroline M Moore
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Siech C, Baudo A, de Angelis M, Jannello LMI, Di Bello F, Goyal JA, Tian Z, Saad F, Shariat SF, Longo N, Carmignani L, de Cobelli O, Briganti A, Kosiba M, Mandel P, Kluth LA, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. Perioperative complications and in-hospital mortality in radical cystectomy patients with heart-valve replacement. Eur J Surg Oncol 2024; 50:108297. [PMID: 38581754 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess in-hospital mortality and complication rates after radical cystectomy (RC) in patients with history of heart-valve replacement. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using the National Inpatient Sample (2000-2019), non-metastatic bladder cancer patients undergoing RC were stratified according to history of heart-valve replacement. Regression models (RM) predicted hospital outcomes. RESULTS Of 25,535 RC patients, 250 (1.0%) harbored history of heart-valve replacement. Heart-valve replacement patients were older (median 74 vs. 70 years), more frequently male (87.2 vs. 80.6%), and more frequently had Charlson comorbidity index ≥3 (26.8 vs. 18.9%). In RC patients with history of heart-valve replacement vs. others, 62 vs. 2634 (24.8 vs. 10.4%) experienced cardiac complications, 28 vs. 3092 (11.2 vs. 12.2%) intraoperative complications, 11 vs. 1046 (4.4 vs. 4.1%) infections, <11 vs. 594 (<4.4 vs. 2.3%) perioperative bleeding, <11 vs. 699 (<4.4 vs. 2.8%) vascular complications, 74 vs. 6225 (29.6 vs. 24.7%) received blood transfusions, 37 vs. 3054 (14.8 vs. 12.1%) critical care therapy (CCT), and in-hospital mortality was recorded in <11 vs. 463 (<4.4 vs. 1.8%) patients. In multivariable RM, history of heart-valve replacement independently predicted cardiac complications (odds ratio 2.20, 95% confidence interval 1.62-2.99; p < 0.001). Conversely, no statically significant association was recorded between history of heart-valve replacement and length of stay, estimated hospital cost, intraoperative complications, perioperative bleeding, vascular complications, infections, blood transfusions, CCT use, and in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS Radical cystectomy patients with history of heart-valve replacement exhibited a 2.2-fold higher risk of cardiac complications, but no other complications, including no significantly higher in-hospital mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Marina Kosiba
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
de Angelis M, Baudo A, Siech C, Jannello LMI, Di Bello F, Goyal JA, Tian Z, Longo N, de Cobelli O, Chun FKH, Saad F, Shariat SF, Carmignani L, Gandaglia G, Moschini M, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI. Non-Surgical Bladder-Sparing Multimodal Management in Organ-Confined Urothelial Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder: A Population-Based Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1292. [PMID: 38610970 PMCID: PMC11010909 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trimodal therapy is considered the most validated bladder-sparing treatment in patients with organ-confined urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder (T2N0M0). However, scarce evidence exists regarding cancer-specific mortality (CSM) differences between trimodal therapy and other non-extirpative multimodal treatment options such as radiotherapy alone after transurethral resection (TURBT + RT) or chemotherapy alone after transurethral resection (TURBT + CT). METHODS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2020), we identified T2N0M0 patients treated with either trimodal therapy, TURBT + CT, or TURBT + RT. Temporal trends described trimodal therapy vs. TUBRT + CT vs. TURBT + RT use over time. Survival analyses consisting of Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression (MCR) models addressed CSM according to each treatment modality. RESULTS 3729 (40%) patients underwent TMT vs. 4030 (43%) TURBT + CT vs. 1599 (17%) TURBT + RT. Over time, trimodal therapy use (Estimating annual percent change, EAPC: +1.2%, p = 0.01) and TURBT + CT use increased (EAPC: +1.5%, p = 0.01). In MCR models, relative to trimodal therapy, TURBT + CT exhibited 1-14-fold higher CSM and TURBT + RT 1.68-fold higher CSM. In a subgroup analysis, TURBT + RT was associated with 1.42-fold higher CSM than TURBT + CT (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Strict trimodal therapy that includes both CT and RT after TURBT offers the best cancer control. When strict trimodal therapy cannot be delivered, cancer-specific survival outcomes appear to be superior with TURBT + chemotherapy compared to TURBT + RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada; (M.d.A.); (A.B.); (C.S.); (F.D.B.); (J.A.G.); (Z.T.); (F.S.)
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, URI—Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (G.G.); (M.M.); (F.M.); (A.B.)
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada; (M.d.A.); (A.B.); (C.S.); (F.D.B.); (J.A.G.); (Z.T.); (F.S.)
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, 20097 Milan, Italy;
| | - Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada; (M.d.A.); (A.B.); (C.S.); (F.D.B.); (J.A.G.); (Z.T.); (F.S.)
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada; (M.d.A.); (A.B.); (C.S.); (F.D.B.); (J.A.G.); (Z.T.); (F.S.)
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada; (M.d.A.); (A.B.); (C.S.); (F.D.B.); (J.A.G.); (Z.T.); (F.S.)
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Jordan A. Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada; (M.d.A.); (A.B.); (C.S.); (F.D.B.); (J.A.G.); (Z.T.); (F.S.)
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada; (M.d.A.); (A.B.); (C.S.); (F.D.B.); (J.A.G.); (Z.T.); (F.S.)
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Felix K. H. Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada; (M.d.A.); (A.B.); (C.S.); (F.D.B.); (J.A.G.); (Z.T.); (F.S.)
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria;
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Hourani Center of Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman 19328, Jordan
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, 20097 Milan, Italy;
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, URI—Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (G.G.); (M.M.); (F.M.); (A.B.)
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, URI—Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (G.G.); (M.M.); (F.M.); (A.B.)
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, URI—Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (G.G.); (M.M.); (F.M.); (A.B.)
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, URI—Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (G.G.); (M.M.); (F.M.); (A.B.)
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I. Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada; (M.d.A.); (A.B.); (C.S.); (F.D.B.); (J.A.G.); (Z.T.); (F.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
de Angelis M, Morra S, Scheipner L, Siech C, Jannello LMI, Baudo A, Goyal JA, Tian Z, Longo N, Ahyai S, de Cobelli O, Chun FKH, Saad F, Shariat SF, Carmignani L, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI. Cancer-specific mortality in non-metastatic T1a renal cell carcinoma treated with radiotherapy versus partial nephrectomy. World J Urol 2024; 42:193. [PMID: 38530480 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04856-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiotherapy (RT) represents a treatment option for small renal masses with proven feasibility and tolerability. However, it has never been directly compared to partial nephrectomy (PN) with cancer-specific mortality (CSM) as an endpoint. METHODS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2020), we identified T1aN0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients treated with RT or PN. We relied on 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) for age, tumor size and histology. Subsequently, cumulative incidence plots and multivariable competing risks regression (CRR) models were fitted. The same methodology was then re-applied to a subset of patients with tumor size 21-40 mm. RESULTS Of 40,355 patients with T1aN0M0 RCC, 40,262 underwent PN (99.8%) vs 93 underwent RT (0.2%). RT patients were older (median age 72 vs 60 years, p < 0.001) and harbored larger tumor size (median size 28 vs 25 mm, p < 0.001) and a higher proportion of non-clear cell RCC (49% vs 22%, p < 0.001). After 1:1 PSM (92 RT versus 92 PN patients), cumulative incidence plots' derived CSM was 21.3 vs 4%, respectively. In multivariable CRR models, RT independently predicted higher CSM (hazard ratio (HR) 4.3, p < 0.001). In the subgroup with tumor size 21-40 mm, after 1:1 PSM (72 RT versus 72 PN patients), cumulative incidence plots derived CSM was 21.3% vs 4%, respectively. In multivariable CRR models, RT also independently predicted higher CSM (HR 4.7, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In T1aN0M0 RCC patients, relative to PN, RT is associated with significantly higher absolute and relative CSM, even in patients with tumor size 21-40 mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Simone Morra
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Lukas Scheipner
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Hourani Center of Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Siech C, Baudo A, de Angelis M, Jannello LMI, Di Bello F, Goyal JA, Tian Z, Saad F, Shariat SF, Longo N, Carmignani L, de Cobelli O, Briganti A, Kosiba M, Mandel P, Kluth LA, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. Perioperative Complications and In-Hospital Mortality in Partial and Radical Nephrectomy Patients with Heart-Valve Replacement. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15228-6. [PMID: 38526833 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15228-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In-hospital mortality and complication rates after partial and radical nephrectomy in patients with history of heart-valve replacement are unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS Relying on the National Inpatient Sample (2000-2019), kidney cancer patients undergoing partial or radical nephrectomy were stratified according to presence or absence of heart-valve replacement. Multivariable logistic and Poisson regression models addressed adverse hospital outcomes. RESULTS Overall, 39,673 patients underwent partial nephrectomy versus 94,890 radical nephrectomy. Of those, 248 (0.6%) and 676 (0.7%) had a history of heart-valve replacement. Heart-valve replacement patients were older (median partial nephrectomy 69 versus 60 years; radical nephrectomy 71 versus 63 years), and more frequently exhibited Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 3 (partial nephrectomy 22 versus 12%; radical nephrectomy 32 versus 23%). In partial nephrectomy patients, history of heart-valve replacement increased the risk of cardiac complications [odds ratio (OR) 4.33; p < 0.001), blood transfusions (OR 2.00; p < 0.001), intraoperative complications (OR 1.53; p = 0.03), and longer hospital stay [rate ratio (RR) 1.25; p < 0.001], but not in-hospital mortality (p = 0.5). In radical nephrectomy patients, history of heart-valve replacement increased risk of postoperative bleeding (OR 4.13; p < 0.001), cardiac complications (OR 2.72; p < 0.001), intraoperative complications (OR 1.53; p < 0.001), blood transfusions (OR 1.27; p = 0.02), and longer hospital stay (RR 1.12; p < 0.001), but not in-hospital mortality (p = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS History of heart-valve replacement independently predicted four of twelve adverse outcomes in partial nephrectomy and five of twelve adverse outcomes in radical nephrectomy patients including intraoperative and cardiac complications, blood transfusions, and longer hospital stay. Conversely, no statistically significant differences were observed in in-hospital mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Marina Kosiba
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Pellegrino F, Martini A, Falagario UG, Rautiola J, Russo A, Mertens LS, Di Gianfrancesco L, Bravi CA, Vollemaere J, Abdeen M, Moschini M, Mendrek M, Kjøbli E, Buse S, Wijburg C, Touzani A, Ploussard G, Antonelli A, Schwenk L, Ebbing J, Vasdev N, Froelicher G, John H, Canda AE, Balbay MD, Stoll M, Edeling S, Berquin C, Van Praet C, Leyh-Bannurah SR, Siemer S, Stoeckle M, Mottrie A, D'Hondt F, Crestani A, Porreca A, Briganti A, Montorsi F, van der Poel H, Dacaestecker K, Gaston R, Hosseini A, Wiklund NP. How can we reduce morbidity after robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal neobladder? A report on postoperative complications by the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group. BJU Int 2024. [PMID: 38511350 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Pellegrino
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Alberto Martini
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ugo Giovanni Falagario
- Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
- Department of Urology, Clinique Saint Augustin, Bordeaux, France
| | - Juhana Rautiola
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Antonio Russo
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Oncological Urology, IRCCS Veneto Institute of Oncology, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Carlo Andrea Bravi
- Orsi Academy, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Urology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Jonathan Vollemaere
- Department of Urology, Urologic Oncology and Robot-assisted Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Gronau, Germany
| | - Muhammad Abdeen
- Department of Urology, Urologic Oncology and Robot-assisted Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Gronau, Germany
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - Mikolaj Mendrek
- Department of Urology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Eirik Kjøbli
- Department of Urology, Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus, Essen, Germany
| | - Stephan Buse
- Department of Urology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Carl Wijburg
- Department of Urology, International Center of Oncology, Casablanca, Morocco
| | - Alae Touzani
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Laura Schwenk
- Department of Urology, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK
| | - Jan Ebbing
- Department of Urology, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK
| | - Nikhil Vasdev
- Department of Urology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Gabriel Froelicher
- Department of Urology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hubert John
- Department of Urology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Abdullah Erdem Canda
- RMK AIMES (Rahmi M. Koç Academy of Interventional Medicine, Education and Simulation), Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Urology, American Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mevlana Derya Balbay
- Department of Urology, Vinzenz Hospital, Hannover, Germany
- RMK AIMES (Rahmi M. Koç Academy of Interventional Medicine, Education and Simulation), Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Marcel Stoll
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Camille Berquin
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charles Van Praet
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Stefan Siemer
- Department of Urology, Urologic Oncology and Robot-assisted Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Gronau, Germany
| | - Michael Stoeckle
- Department of Urology, Urologic Oncology and Robot-assisted Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Gronau, Germany
| | - Alexander Mottrie
- Orsi Academy, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Urology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Frederiek D'Hondt
- Orsi Academy, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Urology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - Hendrik van der Poel
- Oncological Urology, IRCCS Veneto Institute of Oncology, Padua, Italy
- Department of Urology, AZ Maria Middelares Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Karel Dacaestecker
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Richard Gaston
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Abolfazl Hosseini
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - N Peter Wiklund
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Di Bello F, Baudo A, de Angelis M, Jannello LMI, Siech C, Tian Z, Goyal JA, Collà Ruvolo C, Califano G, La Rocca R, Morra S, Acquati P, Saad F, Shariat SF, Carmignani L, de Cobelli O, Briganti A, Chun FKH, Longo N, Karakiewicz PI. Other-cause mortality in incidental prostate cancer. Prostate 2024. [PMID: 38506561 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In incidental prostate cancer (IPCa), elevated other-cause mortality (OCM) may obviate the need for active treatment. We tested OCM rates in IPCa according to treatment type and cancer grade and we hypothesized that OCM is significantly higher in not-actively-treated patients. METHODS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2015), IPCa patients were identified. Smoothed cumulative incidence plots as well as multivariable competing risks regression models were fitted to address OCM after adjustment for cancer-specific mortality (CSM). RESULTS Of 5121 IPCa patients, 3655 (71%) were not-actively-treated while 1466 (29%) were actively-treated. Incidental PCa not-actively-treated patients were older and exhibited higher proportion of Gleason sum (GS) 6 and clinical T1a stage. In smoothed cumulative incidence plots, 5-year OCM was 20% for not-actively-treated versus 8% for actively-treated patients. Conversely, 5-year CSM was 5% for not-actively-treated versus 4% for actively-treated patients. No active treatment was associated with 1.4-fold higher OCM, even after adjustment for age, cancer characteristics, and CSM. According to GS, OCM reached 16%, 27%, and 35% in GS 6, 7, and 8-10 not-actively-treated IPCa patients, respectively and exceeded CSM recorded for the same three groups (2%, 6%, and 28%, respectively). CONCLUSION Our results quantified OCM rates, confirming that in not-actively-treated IPCa patients OCM is indeed significantly higher than in their actively-treated counterparts (HR: 1.4). These observations validate the use of no active treatment in IPCa patients, in whom OCM greatly surpasses CSM (20% vs. 5%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Califano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto La Rocca
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Simone Morra
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pietro Acquati
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Urology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
de Angelis M, Baudo A, Siech C, Jannello LMI, Di Bello F, Goyal JA, Tian Z, Longo N, de Cobelli O, Chun FKH, Saad F, Shariat SF, Carmignani L, Gandaglia G, Moschini M, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI. The effect of race/ethnicity on cancer-specific mortality after trimodal therapy. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2024:10.1007/s40615-024-01973-7. [PMID: 38509444 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-024-01973-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Revised: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Trimodal therapy (TMT) is the most validated bladder-sparing treatment for organ-confined urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder (OC UCUB, namely cT2N0M0). However, it is unknown if barriers to the use of TMT or cancer-specific mortality (CSM) differences exist according to race/ethnicity. We addressed this knowledge gap. MATERIAL AND METHODS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2020), we identified OC UCUB patients aged from 18 to 85 treated with radical cystectomy (RC) or TMT. Temporal trends described TMT versus RC use over time. Subsequently, in the subgroup of TMT-treated patients, survival analyses consisting of Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression (MCR) models addressed CSM according to race/ethnicity. RESULTS Among 19,501 assessable patients, 15,336 (79%) underwent RC versus 4165 TMT (21%). Overall, of all races/ethnicities, 16,245 (83.3%) were White Americans, 1215 (6.3%) Hispanics, 1160 (5.9%) African Americans, and 881 (4.5%) Asian/Pacific Islanders. Among TMT-treated patients, 3460 (83.1%) were White Americans, 298 (7.1%) African Americans, 218 (5.3%) Hispanics, and 189 (4.5%) Asian/Pacific Islanders. The lowest rate of TMT use relative to RC and TMT patients was recorded in Hispanics (17.9%). Over time, TMT use increased in White Americans (EAPC: + 4.5%, p = 0.001) and Asians/Pacific Islanders (EAPC: + 5.2%, p = 0.003), but not in others. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed median CSM of 49 months, 41 months, and 34 months and not reached in White Americans, Hispanics, African Americans, and Asian/Pacific Islanders, respectively (p = 0.02). In MCR models, two race/ethnicity subgroups independently predicted either worse (African Americans, HR: 1.20, p = 0.02) or better CSM (Asian/Pacific Islanders, HR: 0.75, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION Race/ethnicity affects both access to TMT (lower access in Hispanics) as well as survival after TMT (better in Asians/Pacific Islanders and worse in African Americans).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Goethe University Frankfurt Am Main, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Goethe University Frankfurt Am Main, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Hourani Center of Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
de Angelis M, Baudo A, Siech C, Jannello LMI, Di Bello F, Goyal JA, Tian Z, Longo N, de Cobelli O, Chun FKH, Saad F, Shariat SF, Carmignani L, Gandaglia G, Moschini M, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI. Trimodal therapy effect on survival in urothelial vs non-urothelial bladder cancer. BJU Int 2024. [PMID: 38494989 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To address cancer-specific mortality free-survival (CSM-FS) differences in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder (UCUB) vs non-UCUB who underwent trimodal therapy (TMT), according to organ confined (OC: T2N0M0) vs non-organ confined (NOC: T3-4NanyM0 or TanyN1-3M0) clinical stages. PATIENTS AND METHODS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2020), we identified patients with cT2-T4N0-N3M0 bladder cancer treated with TMT, defined as the combination of transurethral resection of bladder tumour, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Temporal trends described TMT use over time. Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression (MCR) models addressed CSM in UCUB vs non-UCUB according to OC vs NOC stages. RESULTS Of 5130 assessable TMT-treated patients, 425 (8%) harboured non-UCUB vs 4705 (92%) who had UCUB. The TMT rates increased for patients with OC UCUB from 92.4% to 96.8% (estimated annual percentage change of 0.4%, P < 0.001), but not in the NOC stages (P = 0.3). In the OC stage, the median CSM-FS was 36 months in patients with non-UCUB vs 60 months in those with UCUB, respectively (P = 0.01). Conversely, in the NOC stage, the median CSM-FS was 23 months both in UCUB and non-UCUB (P = 0.9). In the MCR models addressing OC stage, non-UCUB histology independently predicted higher CSM (hazard ratio 1.45, P = 0.004), but not in the NOC stage (P = 0.9). CONCLUSION In OC UCUB, TMT rates have increased over time in a guideline-consistent fashion. Patients with OC non-UCUB treated with TMT showed a CSM disadvantage relative to OC UCUB. In the NOC stage, use of TMT resulted in dismal CSM, regardless of UCUB vs non-UCUB histology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Di Bello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Hourani Center of Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Barletta F, Tappero S, Morra S, Incesu RB, Cano Garcia C, Piccinelli ML, Scheipner L, Tian Z, Gandaglia G, Stabile A, Mazzone E, Terrone C, Longo N, Tilki D, Chun FKH, de Cobelli O, Ahyai S, Saad F, Shariat SF, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI. Identifying low cancer-specific mortality risk lymph node-positive radical prostatectomy patients. J Surg Oncol 2024. [PMID: 38470523 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify low cancer-specific mortality (CSM) risk lymph node-positive (pN1) radical prostatectomy (RP) patients. METHODS Within Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database (2010-2015) pN1 RP patients were identified. Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox-regression (MCR) models were used. Pathological characteristics were used to identify patients at lowest CSM risk. RESULTS Overall, 2197 pN1 RP patients were identified. Overall, 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate was 93.3%. In MCR models ISUP GG1-2 (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.12, p < 0.001), GG3 (HR: 0.14, p < 0.001), GG4 (HR: 0.35, p = 0.002), pT2 (HR: 0.27, p = 0.012), pT3a (HR: 0.28, p = 0.003), pT3b (HR: 0.39, p = 0.009), and 1-2 positive lymph nodes (HR: 0.64, p = 0.04) independently predicted lower CSM. Pathological characteristics subgroups with the most protective hazard ratios were used to identify low-risk (ISUP GG1-3 and pT2-3a and 1-2 positive lymph nodes) patients versus others (ISUP GG4-5 or pT3b-4 or ≥3 positive lymph nodes). In Kaplan-Meier analyses, 5-year CSS rates were 99.3% for low-risk (n = 480, 21.8%) versus 91.8% (p < 0.001) for others (n = 1717, 78.2%). CONCLUSIONS Lymph node-positive RP patients exhibit variable CSS rates. Within this heterogeneous group, those at very low risk of CSM may be identified based on pathological characteristics, namely ISUP GG1-3, pT2-3a, and 1-2 positive lymph nodes. Such stratification scheme might be of value for individual patients counseling, as well as in design of clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Barletta
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Tappero
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Simone Morra
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Reha-Baris Incesu
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Cristina Cano Garcia
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Mattia L Piccinelli
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Lukas Scheipner
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Terrone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Marra G, Tappero S, Barletta F, Marquis A, Allasia M, Oderda M, Dariane C, Timsit MO, Branchereau J, Mesnard B, Tilki D, Olsburgh J, Kulkarni M, Kasivisvanathan V, Lebacle C, Breda A, Galfano A, Gandaglia G, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Biancone L, Gontero P. Radical Prostatectomy for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer in Renal Transplant Recipients: Outcomes for a Large Contemporary Cohort and a Matched Comparison to Patients Without a Transplant. Eur Urol Focus 2024:S2405-4569(24)00042-7. [PMID: 38453584 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE It is unknown whether renal transplant receipt (RTR) status can affect perioperative and oncological outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP). Our aim was to evaluate oncological and functional outcomes of RTR patients treated with RP for cN0M0 prostate cancer (PCa) via comparison with a no-RTR cohort. METHODS RTR patients who had undergone RP at seven European institutions during 2001-2022 were identified. A multi-institutional cohort of no-RTR patients treated with RP during 2004-2022 served as the comparator group. Propensity score matching (PSM) at a ratio of 1:4 was used to match no-RTR patients to the RTR cohort according to age, prostate-specific antigen, and final pathology features. We used Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox, logistic, and Poisson log-linear regression models to test the outcomes of interest. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS After PSM, we analyzed data for 102 RTR and 408 no-RTR patients. RTR patients experienced higher estimated blood loss (EBL), longer length of hospital stay (LOS) and time to catheter removal, higher postoperative complication rates, and a lower continence recovery rate (all p < 0.001). On multivariable analyses, RTR independently predicted unfavorable operative time (odds ratio [OR] 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-1.25), LOS (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.32-1.86), EBL (OR 2.24, 95% CI 2.18-2.30), and time to catheter removal (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.68-2.21), but not complications or continence recovery. There were no significant differences for any oncological outcomes (biochemical recurrence, local or systemic progression) between the RTR and no-RTR groups. While no PCa deaths were recorded, the overall mortality rate was significantly higher in the RTR group (17% vs 0.5%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Although RP is feasible for RTR patients, the procedure poses non-negligible surgical challenges, with longer operative time and LOS and higher EBL, but no major differences in terms of complications and continence recovery. The RTR group had similar oncological outcomes to the no-RTR group but significantly higher overall mortality related to causes other than PCa. Therefore, careful selection for RP is required among candidates with previous RTR. PATIENT SUMMARY Removal of the prostate for prostate cancer is possible in patients who have had a kidney transplant, and cancer control outcomes are comparable to those for the general population. However, transplant patients have a higher risk of death from causes other than prostate cancer and the prostate surgery is likely to be more challenging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Division of Urology, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
| | - Stefano Tappero
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy; Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Marquis
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Division of Urology, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Allasia
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Division of Urology, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Oderda
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Division of Urology, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Charles Dariane
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | | | - Julien Branchereau
- Institut de Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Benoit Mesnard
- Institut de Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Derya Tilki
- Department of Urology, Martini Klinik, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Cedric Lebacle
- Department of Urology, Kremlin-Bicêtre Hospital, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Paris, France
| | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Galfano
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Biancone
- Department of Nephrology, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Division of Urology, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Pellegrino AA, Calvo RS, Pellegrino F, Morgantini L, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Crivellaro S. Outpatient vs Inpatient Single-Port Robotic Urologic Surgery: Perioperative Outcomes and Complications. Urol Pract 2024; 11:422-429. [PMID: 38377157 DOI: 10.1097/upj.0000000000000500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The da Vinci Single Port (SP) robotic surgical system has minimized the impact of surgery on patients. Hence, outpatient robotic procedures are being explored to reduce costs and improve patient experience. Here, we evaluate the perioperative outcomes and safety of same-day discharge (SDD) after surgery compared to inpatient procedures using the SP. METHODS A total of 374 patients underwent surgery with the da Vinci SP system between January 2019 and February 2023. Surgeries were performed in a single high-volume center. Patients were either managed with a standardized outpatient or inpatient protocol. SDD clinical pathway was implemented in June 2021. Patients were assessed for discharge eligibility based on specific guidelines. Detailed instructions were provided at discharge, and patients were followed postoperatively. Baseline characteristics, perioperative data, complications, time to complication, and readmissions were assessed. RESULTS Two hundred eight patients underwent outpatient surgery and 166 underwent inpatient surgery (total = 374). Outpatient surgery was not associated with increased postoperative complications and readmission compared to inpatient surgery. Ninety percent and 74.6% of patients experienced no complications in the outpatient and inpatient populations, respectively (P =< .001). Time to first complication was also comparable between the 2 groups (3 days [IQR 1-8] vs 10 days [IQR 4-30] for outpatient vs inpatient; P = .3). The proportion of successful SDDs increased over time, reaching 88% in October 2022. CONCLUSIONS Outpatient surgery using the da Vinci SP is safe and feasible, without increasing postoperative complications compared to standard inpatient surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antony A Pellegrino
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ruben Sauer Calvo
- Department of Urology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Francesco Pellegrino
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Morgantini
- Department of Urology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Crivellaro
- Department of Urology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Montorsi F, Moschini M, Gandaglia G, Briganti A. Letter: Treatment of Low-Grade Intermediate-Risk Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer with UGN-102 ± Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor Compared to Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor Monotherapy: A Randomized, Controlled, Phase 3 Trial (ATLAS). J Urol 2024; 211:482-483. [PMID: 38329052 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000003815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Scheipner L, Tappero S, Piccinelli ML, Barletta F, Garcia CC, Incesu RB, Morra S, Tian Z, Saad F, Shariat SF, Terrone C, De Cobelli O, Briganti A, Chun FKH, Tilki D, Longo N, Seles M, Ahyai S, Karakiewicz PI. Differences in overall survival of penile cancer patients versus population-based controls. Int J Urol 2024; 31:274-279. [PMID: 38014575 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess whether 5-year overall survival (OS) of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis (SCCP) patients differs from age-matched male population-based controls. METHODS We relied on the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database (2004-2018) to identify newly diagnosed (2004-2013) SCCP patients. For each case, we simulated an age-matched control (Monte Carlo simulation), relying on the Social Security Administration (SSA) Life Tables with 5 years of follow-up. We compared OS between SCCP patients and population-based controls in a stage-specific fashion. Smoothed cumulative incidence plots displayed cancer-specific mortality (CSM) versus other-cause mortality (OCM). RESULTS Of 2282 SCCP patients, the stage distribution was as follows: stage I 976 (43%) versus stage II 826 (36%) versus stage III 302 (13%) versus stage IV 178 (8%). At 5 years, OS of SCCP patients versus age-matched population-based controls was as follows: stage I 63% versus 80% (Δ = 17%), stage II 50% versus 80% (Δ = 30%), stage III 39% versus 84% (Δ = 45%), stage IV 26% versus 87% (Δ = 61%). At 5 years, CSM versus OCM in SCCP patients according to stage was as follows: stage I 12% versus 24%, stage II 22% versus 28%, stage III 47% versus 14%, and stage IV 60% versus 14%. CONCLUSION SCCP patients exhibit worse OS across all stages. The difference in OS at 5 years between SCCP and age-matched male population-based controls ranged from 17% to 61%. At 5 years, CSM accounted for 12% to 60% of all deaths, across all stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Scheipner
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Stefano Tappero
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Mattia Luca Piccinelli
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Cano Garcia
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Reha-Baris Incesu
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Simone Morra
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Carlo Terrone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Derya Tilki
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nicola Longo
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Seles
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Gandaglia G, Barletta F, Briganti A, Montorsi F. Re: Laura Bukavina, Amy N. Luckenbaugh, Michael S. Hofman, et al. Incorporating Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Management Decisions for Men with Newly Diagnosed or Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2022;83:521-33. Eur Urol 2024; 85:e89. [PMID: 37833180 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Raggi D, Cigliola A, Mercinelli C, Patanè D, Tateo V, Bosi C, Crupi E, Gandaglia G, Briganti A, Necchi A. Re: Which Patients with Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer Benefit from Docetaxel: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data from Randomised Trials. Eur Urol 2024; 85:303. [PMID: 38087732 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Carlo Bosi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Montorsi F, Gandaglia G, Barletta F, Briganti A. Re: Ost P, Siva S, Brabrand S, et al. PEACE V-Salvage Treatment of OligoRecurrent nodal prostate cancer Metastases (STORM): Acute Toxicity of a Randomized Phase 2 Trial. Eur Urol Oncol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2023.09.007. Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(24)00046-4. [PMID: 38418265 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Incesu RB, Morra S, Scheipner L, Barletta F, Baudo A, Garcia CC, Tappero S, Piccinelli ML, Tian Z, Saad F, Shariat SF, de Cobelli O, Terrone C, Chun FKH, Carmignani L, Briganti A, Ahyai S, Longo N, Tilki D, Graefen M, Karakiewicz PI. A population-based validation of the IGCCCG Update Consortium for survival in metastatic non-seminoma testis cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2024:hyae011. [PMID: 38369557 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyae011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2021, the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) Update Consortium reported improved overall survival (OS) rates in a modern cohort of metastatic non-seminoma testis cancer patients within each of the IGCCCG prognosis groups (96% in good vs. 89% in intermediate vs. 67% in poor), compared to the previous IGCCCG publication (92% in good vs. 80% in intermediate vs. 48% in poor). We hypothesized that a similar survival improvement may apply to a contemporary North-American population-based cohort of non-seminoma testis cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010-2018) was used. Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression models tested the effect of IGCCCG prognosis groups on overall mortality (OM). RESULTS Of 1672 surgically treated metastatic non-seminoma patients, 778 (47%) exhibited good vs. 251 (15%) intermediate vs. 643 (38%) poor prognosis. In the overall cohort, five-year OS rate was 94% for good prognosis vs. 87% for intermediate prognosis vs. 65% for poor prognosis. In multivariable Cox regression models predicting OM, intermediate (Hazard ratio [HR] 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-3.9, P < 0.001) and poor prognosis group (HR 6.6, 95% CI 1.0-1.0, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of higher OM, relative to good prognosis group. CONCLUSIONS The survival improvement reported by the IGCCCG Update Consortium is also operational in non-seminoma testis cancer patients within the most contemporary SEER database. This observation indicates that the survival improvement is not only applicable to centres of excellence, but also applies to other institutions at large.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reha-Baris Incesu
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Simone Morra
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Lukas Scheipner
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Cano Garcia
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Stefano Tappero
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Mattia Luca Piccinelli
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Hourani Center of Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Terrone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|