1
|
Erdem S, Bertolo R, Campi R, Capitanio U, Amparore D, Anceschi U, Mir MC, Roussel E, Pavan N, Carbonara U, Kara O, Klatte T, Marchioni M, Pecoraro A, Muselaers S, Marandino L, Diana P, Borregales L, Palumbo C, Warren H, Wu Z, Calio A, Ciccarese C, Degirmenci E, Aydin R, Rebez G, Schips L, Simone G, Minervini A, Serni S, Ozcan F. The prognostic role of histomorphological subtyping in nonmetastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma after curative surgery: is subtype really irrelevant? A propensity score matching analysis of a multi-institutional real life data. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:163.e1-163.e13. [PMID: 38443238 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Revised: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM The role of histomorphological subtyping is an issue of debate in papillary renal cell carcinoma (papRCC). This multi-institutional study investigated the prognostic role of histomorphological subtyping in patients undergoing curative surgery for nonmetastatic papRCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 1,086 patients undergoing curative surgery were included from a retrospectively collected multi-institutional nonmetastatic papRCC database. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on histomorphological subtyping (type 1, n = 669 and type 2, n = 417). Furthermore, a propensity score-matching (PSM) cohort in 1:1 ratio (n = 317 for each subtype) was created to reduce the effect of potential confounding variables. The primary outcome of the study, the predictive role of histomorphological subtyping on the prognosis (recurrence free survival [RFS], cancer specific survival [CSS] and overall survival [OS]) in nonmetastatic papRCC after curative surgery, was investigated in both overall and PSM cohorts. RESULTS In overall cohort, type 2 group were older (66 vs. 63 years, P = 0.015) and more frequently underwent radical nephrectomy (37.4% vs. 25.6%, P < 0.001) and lymphadenectomy (22.3% vs. 15.1%, P = 0.003). Tumor size (4.5 vs. 3.8 cm, P < 0.001) was greater, and nuclear grade (P < 0.001), pT stage (P < 0.001), pN stage (P < 0.001), VENUSS score (P < 0.001) and VENUSS high risk (P < 0.001) were significantly higher in type 2 group. 5-year RFS (89.6% vs. 74.2%, P < 0.001), CSS (93.9% vs. 84.2%, P < 0.001) and OS (88.5% vs. 78.5%, P < 0.001) were significantly lower in type 2 group. On multivariable analyses, type 2 was a significant predictor for RFS (HR:1.86 [95%CI:1.33-2.61], P < 0.001) and CSS (HR:1.91 [95%CI:1.20-3.04], P = 0.006), but not for OS (HR:1.27 [95%CI:0.92-1.76], P = 0.150). In PSM cohort balanced with age, gender, symptoms at diagnosis, pT and pN stages, tumor grade, surgical margin status, sarcomatoid features, rhabdoid features, and presence of necrosis, type 2 increased recurrence risk (HR:1.75 [95%CI: 1.16-2.65]; P = 0.008), but not cancer specific mortality (HR: 1.57 [95%CI: 0.91-2.68]; P = 0.102) and overall mortality (HR: 1.01 [95%CI: 0.68-1.48]; P = 0.981) CONCLUSIONS: This multiinstitutional study suggested that type 2 was associated with adverse histopathologic outcomes, and predictor of RFS and CSS after surgical treatment of nonmetastatic papRCC, in overall cohort. In propensity score-matching cohort, type 2 remained the predictor of RFS. Eventhough 5th WHO classification for renal tumors eliminated histomorphological subtyping, these findings suggest that subtyping is relevant from the point of prognostic view.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selcuk Erdem
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey; European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands.
| | - Riccardo Bertolo
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Department of Urology, San Carlo Di Nancy Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Campi
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; School of Medicine, Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Anceschi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Eduard Roussel
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nicola Pavan
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Urology Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Science, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Umberto Carbonara
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Unit of Andrology and Kidney Transplantation, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation-Urology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Onder Kara
- Department of Urology, Kocaeli University School of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Tobias Klatte
- Department of Urology, Helios Klinikum Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | - Michele Marchioni
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Department of Urology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, G. D'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Angela Pecoraro
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Division of Urology, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Stijn Muselaers
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Laura Marandino
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Diana
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinic, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Leonardo Borregales
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY
| | - Carlotta Palumbo
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Division of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Hannah Warren
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Zhenjie Wu
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Anna Calio
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Chiara Ciccarese
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Medical Oncology Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Enes Degirmenci
- Department of Urology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Resat Aydin
- Medical Oncology Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giacomo Rebez
- Urology Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Science, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Luigi Schips
- Department of Urology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, G. D'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- School of Medicine, Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Sergio Serni
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Faruk Ozcan
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Checcucci E, Piana A, Volpi G, Quarà A, De Cillis S, Piramide F, Burgio M, Meziere J, Cisero E, Colombo M, Bignante G, Sica M, Granato S, Verri P, Gatti C, Alessio P, Di Dio M, Alba S, Fiori C, Amparore D, Porpiglia F. Visual extended reality tools in image-guided surgery in urology: a systematic review. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024:10.1007/s00259-024-06699-6. [PMID: 38589511 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06699-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this systematic review is to assess the clinical implications of employing various Extended Reality (XR) tools for image guidance in urological surgery. METHODS In June 2023, a systematic electronic literature search was conducted using the Medline database (via PubMed), Embase (via Ovid), Scopus, and Web of Science. The search strategy was designed based on the PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) criteria. Study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (registry number CRD42023449025). We incorporated retrospective and prospective comparative studies, along with single-arm studies, which provided information on the use of XR, Mixed Reality (MR), Augmented Reality (AR), and Virtual Reality (VR) in urological surgical procedures. Studies that were not written in English, non-original investigations, and those involving experimental research on animals or cadavers were excluded from our analysis. The quality assessment of comparative and cohort studies was conducted utilizing the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, whilst for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the Jadad scale was adopted. The level of evidence for each study was determined based on the guidelines provided by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. RESULTS The initial electronic search yielded 1,803 papers after removing duplicates. Among these, 58 publications underwent a comprehensive review, leading to the inclusion of 40 studies that met the specified criteria for analysis. 11, 20 and 9 studies tested XR on prostate cancer, kidney cancer and miscellaneous, including bladder cancer and lithiasis surgeries, respectively. Focusing on the different technologies 20, 15 and 5 explored the potential of VR, AR and MR. The majority of the included studies (i.e., 22) were prospective non-randomized, whilst 7 and 11 were RCT and retrospective studies respectively. The included studies that revealed how these new tools can be useful both in preoperative and intraoperative setting for a tailored surgical approach. CONCLUSIONS AR, VR and MR techniques have emerged as highly effective new tools for image-guided surgery, especially for urologic oncology. Nevertheless, the complete clinical advantages of these innovations are still in the process of evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Checcucci
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Strada Provinciale 142, km 3,95, Candiolo, Turin, 10060, Italy.
| | - Alberto Piana
- Department of Urology, Romolo Hospital, Rocca di Neto, Italy
| | - Gabriele Volpi
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Strada Provinciale 142, km 3,95, Candiolo, Turin, 10060, Italy
| | - Alberto Quarà
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Sabrina De Cillis
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Federico Piramide
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Mariano Burgio
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Juliette Meziere
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Edoardo Cisero
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Colombo
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Gabriele Bignante
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Michele Sica
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Stefano Granato
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Verri
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Cecilia Gatti
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Strada Provinciale 142, km 3,95, Candiolo, Turin, 10060, Italy
| | - Paolo Alessio
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Strada Provinciale 142, km 3,95, Candiolo, Turin, 10060, Italy
| | - Michele Di Dio
- Dept. of Surgery, Division of Urology, SS Annunziata Hospital, Cosenza, Italy
| | - Stefano Alba
- Department of Urology, Romolo Hospital, Rocca di Neto, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Checcucci E, De Cillis S, Alladio E, Piramide F, Volpi G, Granato S, Zamengo D, Bignante G, Amparore D, Piana A, Manfredi M, Vallariello E, Stura I, Di Dio M, Autorino R, Porpiglia F, Fiori C. Ten-year functional and oncological outcomes of a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Prostate 2024. [PMID: 38572570 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Revised: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among prostate cancer (PCa) treatment options, mini-invasive surgical approaches have gained a wide diffusion in the last decades. The aim of this study was to present oncological, functional, and quality of life data after 10 years of follow-up of a prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) (ISRCTN11552140) comparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) for the treatment of PCa. METHODS Patients with localized PCa were randomized to undergo LRP or RARP between January 2010 and January 2011. Functional (continence and potency) and oncological (prostate-specific antigen, biochemical recurrence [BCR] and BCR-free survival [BCRFS]) variables were evaluated. BCRFS curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Machine learning partial least square-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was used to identify the variables characterizing more the patients who underwent RARP or LRP. RESULTS Seventy-five of the originally enrolled 120 patients remained on follow-up for 10 years; 40 (53%) underwent RARP and 35 (47%) LRP. Continence and potency recovery rates did not show significant differences (p = 0.068 and p = 0.56, respectively), despite a Δ12% for continence and Δ8% for potency in favor of the robotic approach. However, the quality of continence (in terms of International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form [ICIQ-SF] score) and erection (in terms of International Index of Erectile Function-5 [IIEF-5] score) was significantly better after 10 years in the robotic group (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001). PLS-DA revealed that LRP was characterized by the worst functional-related outcomes analyzing the entire follow-up period. Four (10%) and six (17%) patients experienced BCR in RARP and LRP groups, respectively (p = 0.36), with an overall 10-year BCR-free survival of 88% and 78% (p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS Comparable continence and potency rates were observed between RARP and LRP after a 10-year follow-up. However, the RARP group exhibited superior totally dry rate and erection quality. No difference in terms of oncological outcomes was found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Checcucci
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Sabrina De Cillis
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | | | - Federico Piramide
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Gabriele Volpi
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Stefano Granato
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Davide Zamengo
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Gabriele Bignante
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Alberto Piana
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Matteo Manfredi
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | | | - Ilaria Stura
- Department of Public Health and Pediatric Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Michele Di Dio
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, SS Annunziata Hospital, Cosenza, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Piramide F, Turri F, Amparore D, Fallara G, De Groote R, Knipper S, Wuernschimmel C, Bravi CA, Lambert E, Di Maida F, Liakos N, Pellegrino F, Andras I, Mastrorosa A, Tillu N, Mastroianni R, Paciotti M, Wenzel M, Bianchi R, di Trapani E, Moschovas MC, Gandaglia G, Moschini M, D'Hondt F, Rocco B, Fiori C, Galfano A, Minervini A, Simone G, Briganti A, De Cobelli O, Gaston R, Montorsi F, Breda A, Wiklund P, Porpiglia F, Mottrie A, Larcher A, Dell'Oglio P. Atlas of Intracorporeal Orthotopic Neobladder Techniques After Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy and Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes. Eur Urol 2024; 85:348-360. [PMID: 38044179 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple and heterogeneous techniques have been described for orthotopic neobladder (ONB) reconstruction after robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Nonetheless, a systematic assessment of all the available options is lacking. OBJECTIVE To provide the first comprehensive step-by-step description of all the available techniques for robotic intracorporeal ONB together with individual intraoperative, perioperative and functional outcomes based on a systematic review of the literature. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We performed a systematic review of the literature, and MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify original articles describing different robotic intracorporeal ONB techniques and reporting intra- and perioperative outcomes. Studies were categorized according to ONB type, providing a synthesis of the current evidence. Video material was provided by experts in the field to illustrate the surgical technique of each intracorporeal ONB. SURGICAL PROCEDURE Nine different ONB types were identified: Studer, Hautmann, Y shape, U shape, Bordeaux, Pyramid, Shell, Florence Robotic Intracorporeal Neobladder, and Padua Ileal Neobladder. MEASUREMENTS Continuous and categorical variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation and as frequencies and proportions, respectively. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Of 2587 studies identified, 19 met our inclusion criteria. No cohort studies or randomized control trials comparing different neobladder types are available. Available techniques for intracorporeal robotic ONB reconstruction have similar operative time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative complications, and length of stay. Major variability exists concerning postoperative complications and functional outcomes, likely related to reporting bias. CONCLUSIONS Several techniques are described for intracorporeal ONB during robot-assisted radical cystectomy with comparable perioperative outcomes. We provide the first step-by-step surgical atlas for robot-assisted ONB reconstruction. Further comparative studies are needed to assess any advantage of one technique over others. PATIENT SUMMARY Patients elected for radical cystectomy should be aware that multiple techniques for robotic orthotopic neobladder are available, but that current evidence does not favor one type over the others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Piramide
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Department of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium.
| | - Filippo Turri
- Department of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Fallara
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ruben De Groote
- Department of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Sophie Knipper
- Department of Urology, Vivantes Klinikum am Urban, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Carlo Andrea Bravi
- Department of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium; Department of Urology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Edward Lambert
- Department of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Fabrizio Di Maida
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Nikolaos Liakos
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty and Medical Centre of the University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Francesco Pellegrino
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Iulia Andras
- Department of Urology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Alessandro Mastrorosa
- Unit of Urology, Clinique Saint-Augustin, Bordeaux, France; Urology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Neeraja Tillu
- Department of Urology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Riccardo Mastroianni
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Paciotti
- Department of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Mike Wenzel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Roberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ettore di Trapani
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Bernando Rocco
- Department of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Antonio Galfano
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Richard Gaston
- Unit of Urology, Clinique Saint-Augustin, Bordeaux, France
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Fundaciò Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Peter Wiklund
- Department of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Department of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Dell'Oglio
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mazzone E, Gandaglia G, Robesti D, Rajwa P, Gomez Rivas J, Ibáñez L, Soeterik TFW, Bianchi L, Afferi L, Kesch C, Darr C, Guo H, Zhuang J, Zattoni F, Fendler WP, Amparore D, Huebner NA, Giesen A, Joniau S, Schiavina R, Brunocilla E, Mattei A, Dal Moro F, Moreno Sierra J, Porpiglia F, Picchio M, Chiti A, van den Bergh R, Shariat SF, Montorsi F, Briganti A. Which Patients with Prostate Cancer and Lymph Node Uptake at Preoperative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography Scan Are at a Higher Risk of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy? Identifying Indicators of Systemic Disease by Integrating Clinical, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Functional Imaging Parameters. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:231-240. [PMID: 37689506 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of local therapies including radical prostatectomy (RP) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with clinical lymphadenopathies on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) has scarcely been explored. Limited data are available to identify men who would benefit from RP; on the contrary, those more likely to benefit already have systemic disease. OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess the predictors of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence in surgically managed PCa patients with lymphadenopathies on a PSMA PET/CT scan by integrating clinical, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and PSMA PET/CT parameters. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We identified 519 patients treated with RP and extended lymph node dissection, and who received preoperative PSMA PET between 2017 and 2022 in nine referral centers. Among them, we selected 88 patients with nodal uptake at preoperative PSMA PET (miTxN1M0). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The outcome was PSA persistence, defined as a PSA value of ≥0.1 ng/ml at the first measurement after surgery. Multivariable logistic regression models tested the predictors of PSA persistence. Covariates consisted of biopsy International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group, clinical stage at MRI, and number of positive spots at a PET/CT scan. A regression tree analysis stratified patients into risk groups based on preoperative characteristics. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, lymph node invasion (LNI) was detected in 63 patients (72%) and 32 (36%) experienced PSA persistence after RP. At multivariable analyses, having more than two lymph nodal positive findings at PSMA PET, seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) at MRI, and ISUP grade group >3 at biopsy were independent predictors of PSA persistence (all p < 0.05). At the regression tree analysis, patients were stratified in four risk groups according to biopsy ISUP grade, number of positive findings at PET/CT, and clinical stage at MRI. The model depicted good discrimination at internal validation (area under the curve 78%). CONCLUSIONS One out of three miN1M0 patients showed PSA persistence after surgery. Patients with ISUP grade 2-3, as well as patients with organ-confined disease at MRI and a single or two positive nodal findings at PET are those in whom RP may achieve the best oncological outcomes in the context of a multimodal approach. Conversely, patients with a high ISUP grade and extracapsular extension or SVI or more than two spots at PSMA PET should be considered as potentially affected by systemic disease upfront. PATIENT SUMMARY Our novel and straightforward risk classification integrates currently available preoperative risk tools and should, therefore, assist physician in preoperative counseling of men candidates for radical treatment for prostate cancer with positive lymph node uptake at prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elio Mazzone
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Robesti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Juan Gomez Rivas
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Ibáñez
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Timo F W Soeterik
- Department of Urology, St Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lorenzo Bianchi
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Luca Afferi
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Claudia Kesch
- Department of Urology, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christopher Darr
- Department of Urology, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Hongqian Guo
- Department of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, China
| | - Junlong Zhuang
- Department of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, China
| | - Fabio Zattoni
- Department Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg, Essen, Germany
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Nicolai A Huebner
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexander Giesen
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Eugenio Brunocilla
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Agostino Mattei
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Fabrizio Dal Moro
- Department Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Maria Picchio
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Amparore D, Checcucci E, Piramide F, Busacca G, Volpi G, De Cillis S, Sica M, Verri P, Piana A, Di Dio M, Fiori C, Porpiglia F. Robotic Vena Cava Thrombectomy with Three-dimensional Augmented Reality Guidance. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 62:43-46. [PMID: 38434189 PMCID: PMC10909593 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Robotic surgery has recently been used for treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and neoplastic thrombus located in the renal vein or inferior vena cava (IVC). Accurate identification of the thrombus location is crucial, and three-dimensional augmented reality (3D AR) may be valuable in achieving this. We enrolled patients with nonmetastatic RCC and level 0-I venous thrombus (Mayo Clinic classification) for robot-assisted radical nephrectomy and thrombectomy with 3D AR guidance. Five patients were prospectively enrolled; three had a level 0 thrombus and two had a level I thrombus. The mean operative time was 123 ± 15 min, mean IVC clamping time was 9.4 ± 6.8 min, and mean estimated blood loss was 750 ± 150 ml. The AR system allowed precise estimation of the thrombus location in all cases. No intraoperative complications or postoperative Clavien-Dindo grade >2 complications occurred. Use of 3D AR guidance allowed correct estimation of the limits of the thrombus and guided the surgeon in selecting an appropriate surgical strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Amparore
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Federico Piramide
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Giovanni Busacca
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Gabriele Volpi
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Sabrina De Cillis
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Michele Sica
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Paolo Verri
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | | | - Michele Di Dio
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, SS Annunziata Hospital, Cosenza, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Checcucci E, Amparore D, Volpi G, De Cillis S, Piramide F, Verri P, Piana A, Sica M, Gatti C, Alessio P, Quarà A, Burgio M, Colombo M, Busacca G, Mottrie A, Cherullo E, Breda A, Antonelli A, Bollens R, Minervini A, Porter J, Schiavina R, Autorino R, Tewari A, Di Dio M, Fiori C, Porpiglia F. Metaverse Surgical Planning with Three-dimensional Virtual Models for Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2024; 85:320-325. [PMID: 37673751 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
The recent integration of new virtual visualization modalities with artificial intelligence and high-speed internet connection has opened the door to the advent of the metaverse in medicine. In this totally virtual environment, three-dimensional virtual models (3DVMs) of the patient's anatomy can be visualized and discussed via digital avatars. Here we present for the first time a metaverse preoperative clinical case discussion before minimally invasive partial nephrectomy. The surgeons' digital avatars met in a virtual room and participated in a virtual consultation on the surgical strategy and clamping approach before the procedure. Robotic or laparoscopic procedures are then carried out according to the simulated surgical strategy. We demonstrate how this immersive virtual reality experience overcomes the barriers of distance and how the quality of surgical planning is enriched by a great sense of "being there", even if virtually. Further investigation will improve the quality of interaction with the models and among the avatars.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Checcucci
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Gabriele Volpi
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Sabrina De Cillis
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Federico Piramide
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy; Department of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Paolo Verri
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy; Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alberto Piana
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy; Romolo Hospital, Rocca di Neto, Italy
| | - Michele Sica
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Cecilia Gatti
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy; Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Paolo Alessio
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Alberto Quarà
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Mariano Burgio
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Marco Colombo
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Giovanni Busacca
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Alex Mottrie
- Department of Urology, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Edward Cherullo
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Urology Unit AUOI Verona, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics and Gynecology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Renaud Bollens
- Urology Department, Centre Hospitalier de Wallonie Picarde, Tournai, Belgium
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - James Porter
- Department of Urology, Swedish Medical Group, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ashutosh Tewari
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michele Di Dio
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, SS Annunziata Hospital, Cosenza, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Warren H, Rautio A, Marandino L, Pyrgidis N, Tzelves L, Roussel E, Muselaers S, Erdem S, Palumbo C, Amparore D, Wu Z, Ciccarese C, Diana P, Borregales L, Pavan N, Pecoraro A, Caliò A, Klatte T, Carbonara U, Marchioni M, Bertolo R, Campi R, Tran MG. Diagnostic Biopsy for Small Renal Tumours: A Survey of Current European Practice. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 62:54-60. [PMID: 38585205 PMCID: PMC10998268 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective Renal tumour biopsy (RTB) can help in risk stratification of renal tumours with implications for management, but its utilisation varies. Our objective was to report current practice patterns, experiences, and perceptions of RTB and research gaps regarding RTB for small renal masses (SRMs). Methods Two web-based surveys, one for health care providers (HCPs) and one for patients, were distributed via the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologist Renal Cancer Working Group and the European Society of Residents in Urology in January 2023. Key findings and limitations The HCP survey received 210 responses (response rate 51%) and the patient survey 54 responses (response rate 59%). A minority of HCPs offer RTB to >50% of patients (14%), while 48% offer it in <10% of cases. Most HCPs reported that RTB influences (61.5%) or sometimes influences (37.1%) management decisions. Patients were more likely to favour active treatment if RTB showed high-grade cancer and less likely to favour active treatment for benign histology. HCPs identified situations in which they would not favour RTB, such as cystic tumours and challenging anatomic locations. RTB availability (67%) and concerns about delays to treatment (43%) were barriers to offering RTB. Priority research gaps include a trial demonstrating that RTB leads to better clinical outcomes, and better evidence that benign/indolent tumours do not require active treatment. Conclusions and clinical implications Utilisation of RTB for SRMs in Europe is low, even though both HCPs and patients reported that RTB results can affect disease management. Improving timely access to RTB and generating evidence on outcomes associated with RTB use are priorities for the kidney cancer community. Patient summary A biopsy of a kidney mass can help patients and doctors make decisions on treatment, but our survey found that many patients in Europe are not offered this option. Better access to biopsy services is needed, as well as more research on what happens to patients after biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Warren
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Aleksandra Rautio
- North Estonia Medical Centre, Clinic of General and Oncourology, Tallinn, Estonia
| | | | - Nikolaos Pyrgidis
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Eduard Roussel
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stijn Muselaers
- Department of Urology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Selcuk Erdem
- Department of Urology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Carlotta Palumbo
- Department of Urology, University of Eastern Piedmont, Vercelli, Italy
| | | | - Zhenjie Wu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chiara Ciccarese
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondaziona Policlionico Universatario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Pietro Diana
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Leonardo Borregales
- Columbia University Division of Urology, Mount Sinai Medical Centre, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Nicola Pavan
- University of Palmero and University of Trieste, Palmero, Italy
| | - Angela Pecoraro
- San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Anna Caliò
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Tobias Klatte
- Department of Urology, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Umberto Carbonara
- Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation-Urology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Michele Marchioni
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. D’Annunzio University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | | | - Riccardo Campi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Maxine G.B. Tran
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Amparore D, De Cillis S, Alladio E, Sica M, Piramide F, Verri P, Checcucci E, Piana A, Quarà A, Cisero E, Manfredi M, Di Dio M, Fiori C, Porpiglia F. Development of Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict the Risk of Incontinence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. J Endourol 2024. [PMID: 38512711 DOI: 10.1089/end.2024.0057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Predicting postoperative incontinence beforehand is crucial for intensified and personalized rehabilitation after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Although nomograms exist, their retrospective limitations highlight artificial intelligence (AI)'s potential. This study seeks to develop a machine learning algorithm using robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) data to predict postoperative incontinence, advancing personalized care. Materials and Methods: In this propsective observational study, patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing RARP between April 2022 and January 2023 were assessed. Preoperative variables included age, body mass index, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, digital rectal examination (DRE) results, Gleason score, International Society of Urological Pathology grade, and continence and potency questionnaires responses. Intraoperative factors, postoperative outcomes, and pathological variables were recorded. Urinary continence was evaluated using the Expanded Prostate cancer Index Composite questionnaire, and machine learning models (XGBoost, Random Forest, Logistic Regression) were explored to predict incontinence risk. The chosen model's SHAP values elucidated variables impacting predictions. Results: A dataset of 227 patients undergoing RARP was considered for the study. Post-RARP complications were predominantly low grade, and urinary continence rates were 74.2%, 80.7%, and 91.4% at 7, 13, and 90 days after catheter removal, respectively. Employing machine learning, XGBoost proved the most effective in predicting postoperative incontinence risk. Significant variables identified by the algorithm included nerve-sparing approach, age, DRE, and total PSA. The model's threshold of 0.67 categorized patients into high or low risk, offering personalized predictions about the risk of incontinence after surgery. Conclusions: Predicting postoperative incontinence is crucial for tailoring rehabilitation after RARP. Machine learning algorithm, particularly XGBoost, can effectively identify those variables more heavily, impacting the outcome of postoperative continence, allowing to build an AI-driven model addressing the current challenges in post-RARP rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Sabrina De Cillis
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Eugenio Alladio
- Department of Chemistry, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- Centro Regionale Antidoping "A. Bertinaria" of Orbassano (Turin), Turin, Italy
| | - Michele Sica
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Turin, Italy
| | - Federico Piramide
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Verri
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Turin, Italy
| | - Alberto Piana
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Alberto Quarà
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Edoardo Cisero
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Matteo Manfredi
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Michele Di Dio
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, SS Annunziata Hospital, Cosenza, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Piana A, Amparore D, Sica M, Volpi G, Checcucci E, Piramide F, De Cillis S, Busacca G, Scarpelli G, Sidoti F, Alba S, Piazzolla P, Fiori C, Porpiglia F, Di Dio M. Automatic 3D Augmented-Reality Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Using Machine Learning: Our Pioneer Experience. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1047. [PMID: 38473404 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16051047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
The aim of "Precision Surgery" is to reduce the impact of surgeries on patients' global health. In this context, over the last years, the use of three-dimensional virtual models (3DVMs) of organs has allowed for intraoperative guidance, showing hidden anatomical targets, thus limiting healthy-tissue dissections and subsequent damage during an operation. In order to provide an automatic 3DVM overlapping in the surgical field, we developed and tested a new software, called "ikidney", based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs). From January 2022 to April 2023, patients affected by organ-confined renal masses amenable to RAPN were enrolled. A bioengineer, a software developer, and a surgeon collaborated to create hyper-accurate 3D models for automatic 3D AR-guided RAPN, using CNNs. For each patient, demographic and clinical data were collected. A total of 13 patients were included in the present study. The average anchoring time was 11 (6-13) s. Unintended 3D-model automatic co-registration temporary failures happened in a static setting in one patient, while this happened in one patient in a dynamic setting. There was one failure; in this single case, an ultrasound drop-in probe was used to detect the neoplasm, and the surgery was performed under ultrasound guidance instead of AR guidance. No major intraoperative nor postoperative complications (i.e., Clavien Dindo > 2) were recorded. The employment of AI has unveiled several new scenarios in clinical practice, thanks to its ability to perform specific tasks autonomously. We employed CNNs for an automatic 3DVM overlapping during RAPN, thus improving the accuracy of the superimposition process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Piana
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, 10043 Turin, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, 10043 Turin, Italy
| | - Michele Sica
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Turin, Italy
| | - Gabriele Volpi
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Turin, Italy
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Turin, Italy
| | - Federico Piramide
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, 10043 Turin, Italy
| | - Sabrina De Cillis
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, 10043 Turin, Italy
| | - Giovanni Busacca
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, 10043 Turin, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Pietro Piazzolla
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, 10043 Turin, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, 10043 Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, 10043 Turin, Italy
| | - Michele Di Dio
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Annunziata Hospital, 87100 Cosenza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Porreca A, Di Nicola M, Lucarelli G, Dorin VM, Soria F, Terracciano D, Mistretta FA, Luzzago S, Buonerba C, Cantiello F, Mari A, Minervini A, Veccia A, Antonelli A, Musi G, Hurle R, Busetto GM, Del Giudice F, Ferretti S, Perdonà S, Prete PD, Porreca A, Bove P, Crisan N, Russo GI, Damiano R, Amparore D, Porpiglia F, Autorino R, Piccinelli M, Brescia A, Tătaru SO, Crocetto F, Giudice AL, de Cobelli O, Schips L, Ferro M, Marchioni M. Time to progression is the main predictor of survival in patients with high-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: Results from a machine learning-based analysis of a large multi-institutional database. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:69.e17-69.e25. [PMID: 38302296 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients affected by high-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC) progression to muscle invasive status is considered as the main indicator of local treatment failure. We aimed to investigate the effect of progression and time to progression on overall survival (OS) and to investigate their validity as surrogate endpoints. METHODS A total of 1,510 patients from 18 different institutions treated for T1 high grade NMIBC, followed by a secondary transurethral resection and BCG intravesical instillation. We relied on random survival forest (RSF) to rank covariates based on OS prediction. Cox's regression models were used to quantify the effect of covariates on mortality. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 49.0 months, 485 (32.1%) patients progressed to MIBC, while 163 (10.8%) patients died. The median time to progression was 82 (95%CI: 78.0-93.0) months. In RSF time-to-progression and age were the most predictive covariates of OS. The survival tree defined 5 groups of risk. In multivariable Cox's regression models accounting for progression status as time-dependent covariate, shorter time to progression (as continuous covariate) was associated with longer OS (HR: 9.0, 95%CI: 3.0-6.7; P < 0.001). Virtually same results after time to progression stratification (time to progression ≥10.5 months as reference). CONCLUSION Time to progression is the main predictor of OS in patients with high risk NMIBC treated with BCG and might be considered a coprimary endpoint. In addition, models including time to progression could be considered for patients' stratification in clinical practice and at the time of clinical trials design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annamaria Porreca
- Biostatistics Laboratory, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Marta Di Nicola
- Biostatistics Laboratory, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Vartolomei Mihai Dorin
- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology from Târgu Mureș, Târgu Mureș, Romania
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Daniela Terracciano
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Luzzago
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Buonerba
- CRTR Rare Tumors Reference Center, AOU Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - Francesco Cantiello
- Department of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Hurle
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Simone Ferretti
- Urology Unit, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "SS. Annunziata" Hospital, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Sisto Perdonà
- Uro-Gynecological Department, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Fondazione "G. Pascale"-IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Paola Del Prete
- Scientific Directorate, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Fondazione "G. Pascale"-IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Angelo Porreca
- Department of Robotic Urologic Surgery, Abano Terme Hospital, Abano Terme, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Bove
- Division of Urology, Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicolae Crisan
- Department of Urology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Haţieganu, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | | - Rocco Damiano
- Department of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Mattia Piccinelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Brescia
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sabin Octavian Tătaru
- I.O.S.U.D., George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology from Târgu Mureș, Târgu Mureș, Romania
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | | | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Schips
- Urology Unit, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "SS. Annunziata" Hospital, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Marchioni
- Urology Unit, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "SS. Annunziata" Hospital, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Flammia RS, Anceschi U, Tuderti G, Di Maida F, Grosso AA, Lambertini L, Mari A, Mastroianni R, Bove A, Capitanio U, Amparore D, Lee J, Pandolfo SD, Fiori C, Minervini A, Porpiglia F, Eun D, Autorino R, Leonardo C, Simone G. Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting 3-year chronic kidney disease upstaging following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Int Urol Nephrol 2024; 56:913-921. [PMID: 37848745 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03832-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Aim of the present study was to develop and validate a nomogram to accurately predict the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) upstaging at 3 years in patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). METHODS A multi-institutional database was queried to identify patients treated with RAPN for localized renal tumor (cT1-cT2, cN0, cM0). Significant CKD upstaging (sCKD-upstaging) was defined as development of newly onset CKD stage 3a, 3b, and 4/5. Model accuracy was calculated according to Harrell C-index. Subsequently, internal validation using bootstrapping and calibration was performed. Then nomogram was depicted to graphically calculate the 3-year sCKD-upstaging risk. Finally, regression tree analysis identified potential cut-offs in nomogram-derived probability. Based on this cut-off, four risk classes were derived with Kaplan-Meier analysis tested this classification. RESULTS Overall, 965 patients were identified. At Kaplan-Meier analysis, 3-year sCKD-upstaging rate was 21.4%. The model included baseline (estimated glomerular filtration rate) eGFR, solitary kidney status, multiple lesions, R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score, clamping technique, and postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI). The model accurately predicted 3-year sCKD-upstaging (C-index 84%). Based on identified nomogram cut-offs (7 vs 16 vs 26%), a statistically significant increase in sCKD-upstaging rates between low vs intermediate favorable vs intermediate unfavorable vs high-risk patients (1.3 vs 9.2 vs 22 vs 54.2%, respectively, p < 0.001) was observed. CONCLUSION Herein we introduce a novel nomogram that can accurately predict the risk of sCKD-upstaging at 3 years. Based on this nomogram, it is possible to identify four risk categories. If externally validated, this nomogram may represent a useful tool to improve patient counseling and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rocco Simone Flammia
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
| | - Umberto Anceschi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Tuderti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Maida
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Antonio Andrea Grosso
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Luca Lambertini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Riccardo Mastroianni
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Alfredo Bove
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Jennifer Lee
- Department of Urology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Daniel Eun
- Department of Urology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Costantino Leonardo
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pandolfo SD, Wu Z, Campi R, Bertolo R, Amparore D, Mari A, Verze P, Manfredi C, Franco A, Ditonno F, Cerrato C, Ferro M, Lasorsa F, Contieri R, Napolitano L, Tufano A, Lucarelli G, Cilio S, Perdonà S, Siracusano S, Autorino R, Aveta A. Outcomes and Techniques of Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) for Renal Hilar Masses: A Comprehensive Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:693. [PMID: 38398084 PMCID: PMC10886610 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2023] [Revised: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is increasingly being employed in the management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and it is expanding in the field of complex renal tumors. The aim of this systematic review was to consolidate and assess the results of RAPN when dealing with entirely central hilar masses and to examine the various methods used to address the surgical difficulties associated with them. Methods: A thorough literature search in September 2023 across various databases focused on RAPN for renal hilar masses, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. The primary goal was to evaluate RAPN's surgical and functional outcomes, with a secondary aim of examining different surgical techniques. Out of 1250 records, 13 full-text manuscripts were reviewed. Results: Evidence is growing in favor of RAPN for renal hilar masses. Despite a predominance of retrospective studies and a lack of long-term data, RAPN shows positive surgical outcomes and preserves renal function without compromising cancer treatment effectiveness. Innovative suturing and clamping methods are emerging in surgical management. Conclusions: RAPN is a promising technique for managing renal hilar masses in RCC, offering effective surgical outcomes and renal function preservation. The study highlights the need for more long-term data and prospective studies to further validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savio Domenico Pandolfo
- Department of Urology, University of L’Aquila, 67010 L’Aquila, Italy;
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (S.C.); (A.A.)
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Fisciano, Italy;
| | - Zhenjie Wu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China;
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation Unit, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50121 Firenze, Italy; (R.C.); (A.M.)
| | - Riccardo Bertolo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, 37100 Verona, Italy; (R.B.); (F.D.)
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, 10043 Turin, Italy;
| | - Andrea Mari
- Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation Unit, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50121 Firenze, Italy; (R.C.); (A.M.)
| | - Paolo Verze
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Fisciano, Italy;
| | - Celeste Manfredi
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; (C.M.); (A.F.); (R.A.)
- Unit of Urology, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Franco
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; (C.M.); (A.F.); (R.A.)
- Department of Urology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, 37100 Verona, Italy; (R.B.); (F.D.)
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; (C.M.); (A.F.); (R.A.)
| | - Clara Cerrato
- Urology Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK;
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, IRCCS—European Institute of Oncology, 71013 Milan, Italy;
| | - Francesco Lasorsa
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (F.L.); (G.L.)
| | - Roberto Contieri
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy;
| | - Luigi Napolitano
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (S.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Antonio Tufano
- Department of Urology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, “Fondazione G. Pascale”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.T.); (S.P.)
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (F.L.); (G.L.)
| | - Simone Cilio
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (S.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Sisto Perdonà
- Department of Urology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, “Fondazione G. Pascale”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.T.); (S.P.)
| | | | - Riccardo Autorino
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; (C.M.); (A.F.); (R.A.)
| | - Achille Aveta
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (S.C.); (A.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Francolini G, Marandino L, Ciccarese C, Pecoraro A, Amparore D, Campi R. Metastatic de-novo renal cell carcinoma in the era of immune combinations: what can we learn from real-world data? Minerva Urol Nephrol 2024; 76:120-123. [PMID: 38426426 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.23.05640-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio Francolini
- Unit of Radiation Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
- European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - Laura Marandino
- European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, the Netherlands
- Skin and Renal Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Chiara Ciccarese
- European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, the Netherlands
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, IRCCS A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessio Pecoraro
- European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, the Netherlands
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, the Netherlands -
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Campi
- European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, the Netherlands
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wu Z, Chen H, Chen Q, Ge S, Yu N, Campi R, Gómez Rivas J, Autorino R, Rouprêt M, Psutka SP, Mehrazin R, Porpiglia F, Bensalah K, Black PC, Mir MC, Minervini A, Djaladat H, Margulis V, Bertolo R, Caliò A, Carbonara U, Amparore D, Borregales LD, Ciccarese C, Diana P, Erdem S, Marandino L, Marchioni M, Muselaers CHJ, Palumbo C, Pavan N, Pecoraro A, Roussel E, Warren H, Pandolfo SD, Chen R, Zhou W, Zhai W, He M, Li Y, Han B, Wan J, Zeng X, Yan J, Fu Y, Ji C, Fan X, Zhang G, Zhao C, Jing T, Wang A, Feng C, Zhao H, Sun D, Wang L, Tai S, Zhang C, Chen S, Liu Y, Xu Z, Wang H, Gao J, Wang F, Cheng J, Miao H, Rao Q, Wang J, Xu N, Wang G, Liang C, Liu Z, Xia D, Jiang J, Zu X, Chen M, Guo H, Qin W, Wang Z, Xue W, Shi B, Zhou X, Wang S, Zheng J, Ge J, Feng X, Li M, Chen C, Qu L, Wang L. Prognostic Significance of Grade Discrepancy Between Primary Tumor and Venous Thrombus in Nonmetastatic Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Analysis of the REMEMBER Registry and Implications for Adjuvant Therapy. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:112-121. [PMID: 37468393 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Further stratification of the risk of recurrence of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) with venous tumor thrombus (VTT) will facilitate selection of candidates for adjuvant therapy. OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of tumor grade discrepancy (GD) between the primary tumor (PT) and VTT in nonmetastatic ccRCC on disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was a retrospective analysis of a multi-institutional nationwide data set for patients with pT3N0M0 ccRCC who underwent radical nephrectomy and thrombectomy. OUTCOMES MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Pathology slides were centrally reviewed. GD, a bidirectional variable (upgrading or downgrading), was numerically defined as the VTT grade minus the PT grade. Multivariable models were built to predict DFS, OS, and CSS. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS We analyzed data for 604 patients with median follow-up of 42 mo (excluding events). Tumor GD between VTT and PT was observed for 47% (285/604) of the patients and was an independent risk factor with incremental value in predicting the outcomes of interest (all p < 0.05). Incorporation of tumor GD significantly improved the performance of the ECOG-ACRIN 2805 (ASSURE) model. A GD-based model (PT grade, GD, pT stage, PT sarcomatoid features, fat invasion, and VTT consistency) had a c index of 0.72 for DFS. The hazard ratios were 8.0 for GD = +2 (p < 0.001), 1.9 for GD = +1 (p < 0.001), 0.57 for GD = -1 (p = 0.001), and 0.22 for GD = -2 (p = 0.003) versus GD = 0 as the reference. According to model-converted risk scores, DFS, OS, and CSS significantly differed between subgroups with low, intermediate, and high risk (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Routine reporting of VTT upgrading or downgrading in relation to the PT and use of our GD-based nomograms can facilitate more informed treatment decisions by tailoring strategies to an individual patient's risk of progression. PATIENT SUMMARY We developed a tool to improve patient counseling and guide decision-making on other therapies in addition to surgery for patients with the clear-cell type of kidney cancer and tumor invasion of a vein.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenjie Wu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China; European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
| | - Hui Chen
- Department of Pathology, Jinling Hospital, Clinical School of Nanjing University Medical College, Nanjing, China
| | - Qi Chen
- Department of Health Statistics, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Silun Ge
- Department of Urology, Jinling Hospital, Jinling School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Nengwang Yu
- Department of Urology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Riccardo Campi
- European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Juan Gómez Rivas
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, GRC No. 5, Predictive ONCO-URO, Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Sarah P Psutka
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Reza Mehrazin
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Karim Bensalah
- Department of Urology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Maria C Mir
- Department of Urology; Hospital Universitario La Ribera; Valencia, Spain
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Departments of Urology and Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Hooman Djaladat
- Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Riccardo Bertolo
- European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology Unit, San Carlo di Nancy Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Caliò
- European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Umberto Carbonara
- European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Leonardo D Borregales
- European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chiara Ciccarese
- European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Medical Oncology Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Pietro Diana
- European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Selcuk Erdem
- European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Laura Marandino
- European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Marchioni
- European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Urology Unit, University G. d'Annunzio, Chieti, Italy
| | - Constantijn H J Muselaers
- European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Carlotta Palumbo
- European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Division of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Nicola Pavan
- European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology Clinic, Department of Surgical, Oncological, and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Angela Pecoraro
- European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy
| | - Eduard Roussel
- European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hannah Warren
- European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Savio Domenico Pandolfo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Rui Chen
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenquan Zhou
- Department of Urology, Jinling Hospital, Clinical School of Nanjing University Medical College, Nanjing, China
| | - Wei Zhai
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Miaoxia He
- Department of Pathology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yaoming Li
- Department of Urology, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Bo Han
- Department of Pathology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Jie Wan
- Department of Pathology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xing Zeng
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Junan Yan
- Department of Urology, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yao Fu
- Department of Pathology, Drum Tower Hospital, Clinical School of Nanjing University Medical College, Nanjing, China
| | - Changwei Ji
- Department of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Clinical School of Nanjing University Medical College, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiang Fan
- Department of Pathology, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Guangyuan Zhang
- Department of Urology, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Cheng Zhao
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Taile Jing
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Anbang Wang
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chenchen Feng
- Department of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hongwei Zhao
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Di Sun
- Department of Pathology, Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Liang Wang
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Sheng Tai
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Cheng Zhang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Shaohao Chen
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yixun Liu
- Department of Urology, Anhui Provincial Hospital/The First Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Zhipeng Xu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Haifeng Wang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jinli Gao
- Department of Pathology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Fubo Wang
- Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Jiwen Cheng
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - He Miao
- Department of Urology, Jinling Hospital, Jinling School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Qiu Rao
- Department of Pathology, Jinling Hospital, Clinical School of Nanjing University Medical College, Nanjing, China
| | - Jianning Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Ning Xu
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Gongxian Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Chaozhao Liang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Zhiyu Liu
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Dan Xia
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jun Jiang
- Department of Urology, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xiongbing Zu
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Ming Chen
- Department of Urology, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Hongqian Guo
- Department of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Clinical School of Nanjing University Medical College, Nanjing, China
| | - Weijun Qin
- Department of Urology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Zhe Wang
- Department of Pathology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Wei Xue
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Benkang Shi
- Department of Urology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xiaojun Zhou
- Department of Pathology, Jinling Hospital, Clinical School of Nanjing University Medical College, Nanjing, China
| | - Shaogang Wang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Junhua Zheng
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jingping Ge
- Department of Urology, Jinling Hospital, Clinical School of Nanjing University Medical College, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiang Feng
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Minming Li
- Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Cheng Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Clinical School of Nanjing University Medical College, Nanjing, China.
| | - Le Qu
- Department of Urology, Jinling Hospital, Clinical School of Nanjing University Medical College, Nanjing, China.
| | - Linhui Wang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bauckneht M, Checcucci E, Cisero E, Rizzo A, Racca M, De Cillis S, Amparore D, De Luca S, Fiori C, Rescigno P, Porpiglia F. The prognostic role of next-generation imaging-driven upstaging in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:864-870. [PMID: 37935995 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06490-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Phase III evidence showed that next-generation imaging (NGI), such as prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT), provides higher diagnostic accuracy than bone scan and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (conventional imaging, CI) in the primary staging of intermediate-to-high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients. However, due to the lack of outcome data, the introduction of NGI in routine clinical practice is still debated. Analysing the oncological outcome of patients upstaged by NGI (though managed according to CI) might shed light on this issue, supporting the design of randomised trials comparing the effects of treatments delivered based on NGI vs. CI. METHODS We prospectively enrolled a cohort of 100 biopsy-proven intermediate-to-high-risk PCa patients staged with CI and PSMA PET/CT (though managed according to the CI stage), to assess the frequency of the stage migration phenomenon. Stage migration was then assessed as biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) predictor. RESULTS Three patients were lost at follow-up after imaging. PSMA PET/CT upstaged 26.8% of patients compared to CI, while it downstaged 6.1% of patients. Notably, 50% of patients excluded from surgery due to the presence of bone metastases at CI would have been treated with radical-intent approaches if PSMA PET/CT had guided the treatment choice. After a median follow-up of 6 months of surgically treated patients, 22/83 (26.5%) had biochemical recurrence (BCR). PSMA PET/CT-driven upstaging determined a significant risk increase for BCR (HR:3.41, 95%CI:1.21-9.56, p = 0.019). Including stage migration in a univariable and multivariable model identified PSMA PET/CT-upstaging as an independent predictor of bRFS. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, implementing NGI for staging purposes improves the prediction of bRFS. Although phase III evidence is still needed, this advancement suggests that NGI may better identify patients who would benefit from local treatments than those who may achieve better oncological outcomes through systemic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Bauckneht
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, TO, Italy
| | - Edoardo Cisero
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Alessio Rizzo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Turin, Italy
| | - Manuela Racca
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Turin, Italy
| | - Sabrina De Cillis
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Stefano De Luca
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Pasquale Rescigno
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, TO, Italy
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Martini A, Wever L, Soeterik TFW, Rakauskas A, Fankhauser CD, Grogg JB, Checcucci E, Amparore D, Haiquel L, Rodriguez-Sanchez L, Ploussard G, Qiang P, Affentranger A, Marquis A, Marra G, Ettala O, Zattoni F, Falagario UG, De Angelis M, Kesch C, Apfelbeck M, Al-Hammouri T, Kretschmer A, Kasivisvanathan V, Preisser F, Lefebvre E, Olivier J, Radtke JP, Carrieri G, Moro FD, Boström P, Jambor I, Gontero P, Chiu PK, John H, Macek P, Porpiglia F, Hermanns T, van den Bergh RCN, van Basten JPA, Gandaglia G, Valerio M. An updated model for predicting side-specific extraprostatic extension in the era of MRI-targeted biopsy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024:10.1038/s41391-023-00776-x. [PMID: 38182804 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00776-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Revised: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Accurate prediction of extraprostatic extension (EPE) is pivotal for surgical planning. Herein, we aimed to provide an updated model for predicting EPE among patients diagnosed with MRI-targeted biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed a multi-institutional dataset of men with clinically localized prostate cancer diagnosed by MRI-targeted biopsy and subsequently underwent prostatectomy. To develop a side-specific predictive model, we considered the prostatic lobes separately. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was fitted to predict side-specific EPE. The decision curve analysis was used to evaluate the net clinical benefit. Finally, a regression tree was employed to identify three risk categories to assist urologists in selecting candidates for nerve-sparing, incremental nerve sparing and non-nerve-sparing surgery. RESULTS Overall, data from 3169 hemi-prostates were considered, after the exclusion of prostatic lobes with no biopsy-documented tumor. EPE was present on final pathology in 1,094 (34%) cases. Among these, MRI was able to predict EPE correctly in 568 (52%) cases. A model including PSA, maximum diameter of the index lesion, presence of EPE on MRI, highest ISUP grade in the ipsilateral hemi-prostate, and percentage of positive cores in the ipsilateral hemi-prostate achieved an AUC of 81% after internal validation. Overall, 566, 577, and 2,026 observations fell in the low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups for EPE, as identified by the regression tree. The EPE rate across the groups was: 5.1%, 14.9%, and 48% for the low-, intermediate- and high-risk group, respectively. CONCLUSION In this study we present an update of the first side-specific MRI-based nomogram for the prediction of extraprostatic extension together with updated risk categories to help clinicians in deciding on the best approach to nerve-preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Martini
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Toulouse, France.
| | - Lieke Wever
- St. Antonius ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Arnas Rakauskas
- Department of Urology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Josias Bastian Grogg
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Luciano Haiquel
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Peng Qiang
- SH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Alessandro Marquis
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Otto Ettala
- Department of Urology, Turku University, Turku, Finland
| | - Fabio Zattoni
- Urology Unit, Academical Medical Centre Hospital, Udine, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Mario De Angelis
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Kesch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Tarek Al-Hammouri
- Department of Urology, University College London and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Department of Urology, University College London and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Felix Preisser
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | | | - Jan Philipp Radtke
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Fabrizio Dal Moro
- Urology Unit, Academical Medical Centre Hospital, Udine, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Peter Boström
- Department of Urology, Turku University, Turku, Finland
| | - Ivan Jambor
- Department of Urology, Turku University, Turku, Finland
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Peter K Chiu
- SH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Hubert John
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Petr Macek
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | | | - Thomas Hermanns
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Jean-Paul A van Basten
- St. Antonius ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Department of Urology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Amparore D, Sica M, Verri P, Piramide F, Checcucci E, De Cillis S, Piana A, Campobasso D, Burgio M, Cisero E, Busacca G, Di Dio M, Piazzolla P, Fiori C, Porpiglia F. Computer Vision and Machine-Learning Techniques for Automatic 3D Virtual Images Overlapping During Augmented Reality Guided Robotic Partial Nephrectomy. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2024; 23:15330338241229368. [PMID: 38374643 PMCID: PMC10878218 DOI: 10.1177/15330338241229368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The research's purpose is to develop a software that automatically integrates and overlay 3D virtual models of kidneys harboring renal masses into the Da Vinci robotic console, assisting surgeon during the intervention. INTRODUCTION Precision medicine, especially in the field of minimally-invasive partial nephrectomy, aims to use 3D virtual models as a guidance for augmented reality robotic procedures. However, the co-registration process of the virtual images over the real operative field is performed manually. METHODS In this prospective study, two strategies for the automatic overlapping of the model over the real kidney were explored: the computer vision technology, leveraging the super-enhancement of the kidney allowed by the intraoperative injection of Indocyanine green for superimposition and the convolutional neural network technology, based on the processing of live images from the endoscope, after a training of the software on frames from prerecorded videos of the same surgery. The work-team, comprising a bioengineer, a software-developer and a surgeon, collaborated to create hyper-accuracy 3D models for automatic 3D-AR-guided RAPN. For each patient, demographic and clinical data were collected. RESULTS Two groups (group A for the first technology with 12 patients and group B for the second technology with 8 patients) were defined. They showed comparable preoperative and post-operative characteristics. Concerning the first technology the average co-registration time was 7 (3-11) seconds while in the case of the second technology 11 (6-13) seconds. No major intraoperative or postoperative complications were recorded. There were no differences in terms of functional outcomes between the groups at every time-point considered. CONCLUSION The first technology allowed a successful anchoring of the 3D model to the kidney, despite minimal manual refinements. The second technology improved kidney automatic detection without relying on indocyanine injection, resulting in better organ boundaries identification during tests. Further studies are needed to confirm this preliminary evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Dept. of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano (Turin), Italy
| | - Michele Sica
- Division of Urology, Dept. of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano (Turin), Italy
| | - Paolo Verri
- Division of Urology, Dept. of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano (Turin), Italy
| | - Federico Piramide
- Division of Urology, Dept. of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano (Turin), Italy
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Sabrina De Cillis
- Division of Urology, Dept. of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano (Turin), Italy
| | - Alberto Piana
- Division of Urology, Dept. of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano (Turin), Italy
- Department of Urology, Romolo Hospital, Rocca di Neto (KR), Italy
| | - Davide Campobasso
- Urology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
- 2 Level Master Degree Program in Advanced Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgery in Urology, Division of Urology, Dept. of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi, Italy
| | - Mariano Burgio
- Division of Urology, Dept. of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano (Turin), Italy
| | - Edoardo Cisero
- Division of Urology, Dept. of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano (Turin), Italy
| | - Giovanni Busacca
- Division of Urology, Dept. of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano (Turin), Italy
| | - Michele Di Dio
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Annunziata Hospital, Cosenza, Italy
| | - Pietro Piazzolla
- Department of Management and Production Engineer, Polytechnic University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Division of Urology, Dept. of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano (Turin), Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Dept. of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano (Turin), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Caliò A, Amparore D, Roussel E, Bertolo R, Erdem S, Marchioni M, Pavan N, Campi R. The World Health Organization 2022 Classification of renal tumors: key updates for urologists. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023; 75:766-769. [PMID: 38126288 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.23.05434-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Caliò
- Section of Pathology, Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy -
| | - Daniele Amparore
- School of Medicine, Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Eduard Roussel
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Selçuk Erdem
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Michele Marchioni
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Laboratory of Biostatistics, G. D'Annunzio Chieti-Pescara University, Chieti, Italy
- Department of Urology, SS Annunziata Hospital, G. D'Annunzio Chieti-Pescara University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Nicola Pavan
- Unit of Urology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, P. Giaccone University Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Amparore D, De Cillis S, Schulman C, Kadner G, Fiori C, Porpiglia F. Temporary implantable nitinol device for benign prostatic hyperplasia-related lower urinary tract symptoms: over 48-month results. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023; 75:743-751. [PMID: 37350585 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.23.05322-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study (MT02) reports >48-month (50-79 months) results of a prospective, single-arm, multicenter study (NCT02145208) of temporary implantable nitinol device (iTind®) in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-related lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). METHODS Men with symptomatic BPH (International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS] ≥10, Maximum flow rate [Qmax] <12 mL/s, and prostate volume <75 mL) from 9 centers were enrolled from December 2014 to December 2016. Total 50/81 (62%) patients at 3/9 sites (Italy, Switzerland, and Belgium), pursued the study beyond 36 months following iTind® device, per study protocol. Due to COVID-19, follow-up was amended. Each patient was assessed once during 50-79 months postoperatively for IPSS and IPSS-quality of life (IPSS-QoL), change in medication, need for surgical re-treatment and adverse events telephonically. RESULTS Post 36 month-follow-up, 5 patients were lost to follow-up and 2 patients died unrelated to iTind® device placement. Two patients (36-48 months follow-up) required surgical re-treatments (1 transurethral resection of prostate, 1 Thulium laser enucleation of prostate). >48 months results were available for 41 patients wherein iTind® device treatment showed significant improvement in symptoms (IPSS: -45.3%, P<0.0001 and IPSS-QoL: -45.1%, P<0.0001) from baseline to 79 months post-procedure; mean±SD of 11.26±7.67 and 2.10±1.41 points, respectively. No complications were recorded between 36 up to 79 months; no patient required additional medication. CONCLUSIONS iTind® device provided significant and durable symptom reduction and improved IPSS-QoL for >48 months post treatment. No late postoperative complications were reported beyond 36 months of follow-up. Surgical re-treatment rate for >36 months was 4%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Claude Schulman
- Division of Urology, CHIREC Cancer Institute, University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gregor Kadner
- Division of Urology, Kantonsspital, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Division of Urology, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Shrivastava N, Sharma G, Ahluwalia P, Gautam G, Erdem S, Amparore D, Marchioni M, Pavan N, Marandino L, Roussel E, Campi R, Bertolo R. Off-clamp Versus On-clamp Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Synthesis by the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Study Group. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 58:10-18. [PMID: 38028236 PMCID: PMC10630115 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Context The superiority of off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) over the on-clamp technique has recently been questioned by randomized controlled trials comparing the two techniques. Objective To systematically review the recent literature and perform a quantitative synthesis of data on the comparison of off-clamp versus off-clamp hilar control during RAPN. Evidence acquisition A systematic search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for studies comparing off-clamp versus on-clamp RAPN in terms of perioperative and functional outcomes. The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023413160). Only prospective randomized controlled trials and retrospective matched observational studies were included. The primary outcome of the study was the percentage decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Evidence synthesis A total of 11 studies were included involving a total of 2483 patients (944 patients in the off-clamp and 1539 patients in the on-clamp group). There was no difference between the two groups in the percentage decline in eGFR (mean difference [MD] 0.04%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.7% to 3.86%; p = 0.98). There were so significant differences between the groups for length of hospital stay (p = 0.56), complications (p = 0.08), conversion to open or radical surgery (p = 0.18), estimated blood loss (p = 0.06), or need for blood transfusion (p = 0.07). The operative time was shorter in the off-clamp group (MD-21.89 min, 95% CI -42.5 to -1.27; p = 0.04) but after sensitivity analysis the difference was no longer statistically significant (p = 0.15). The positive surgical margin rate was significantly lower in the off-clamp group (odds ratio 0.6, 95% CI 0.39-0.91; p = 0.02). Conclusions Our review revealed no clinically relevant differences in perioperative and functional outcomes between off-clamp and on-clamp RAPN. Patient summary In this review, we compared the two methods of controlling the kidney blood vessels during robot-assisted surgery to remove part of the kidney. We noted that there was no difference between the two groups for outcomes such as complications and the decrease in kidney function after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikita Shrivastava
- Department of Urology, DKS Superspeciality Hospital and Postgraduate Institute, Raipur, India
| | - Gopal Sharma
- Urologic Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, India
| | - Puneet Ahluwalia
- Urologic Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, India
| | - Gagan Gautam
- Urologic Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, India
| | - Selcuk Erdem
- Urologic Oncology Division, Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Michele Marchioni
- Laboratory of Biostatistics, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. D’Annunzio Chieti-Pescara University, Chieti, Italy
- Department of Urology, SS Annunziata Hospital, G. D’Annunzio Chieti-Pescara University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Nicola Pavan
- Unit of Urology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, P. Giaccone University Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Laura Marandino
- Clinical Research Fellow in Renal & Melanoma, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Eduard Roussel
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | - European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Study Group‡
- Department of Urology, DKS Superspeciality Hospital and Postgraduate Institute, Raipur, India
- Urologic Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Medanta The Medicity, Gurugram, India
- Urologic Oncology Division, Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
- Laboratory of Biostatistics, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. D’Annunzio Chieti-Pescara University, Chieti, Italy
- Department of Urology, SS Annunziata Hospital, G. D’Annunzio Chieti-Pescara University, Chieti, Italy
- Unit of Urology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, P. Giaccone University Hospital, Palermo, Italy
- Clinical Research Fellow in Renal & Melanoma, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Urology Unit, San Carlo di Nancy Hospital, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Andras I, Pecoraro A, Telecan T, Piana A, Boissier R, Hevia V, Prudhomme T, Amparore D, Bertolo R, Carbonara U, Erdem S, Diana P, Ingels A, Kara O, Marandino L, Marchioni M, Muselaers S, Pavan N, Pecoraro A, Roussel E, Crisan N, Territo A, Campi R. How to manage renal masses in kidney transplant recipients? A collaborative review by the EAU-YAU kidney transplantation and renal cancer working groups. Actas Urol Esp 2023; 47:621-630. [PMID: 37100223 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2023.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Kidney transplant (KT) recipients have a four-times higher risk of renal malignancies compared to general population. As these patients frequently harbor bilateral or multifocal tumors, the management of renal masses is still under debate. OBJECTIVE To explore the current management of the native kidney masses in KT patients. ACQUISITION OF EVIDENCE We performed a literature search on MEDLINE/PubMed database. A number of 34 studies were included in the present review. SYNTHESIS OF EVIDENCE In frail patients with renal masses below 3 cm, active surveillance is a feasible alternative. Nephron-sparing surgery is not justified for masses in the native kidney. Radical nephrectomy is the standard treatment for post-transplant renal tumors of the native kidneys in KT recipients, with laparoscopic techniques leading to significantly less perioperative complication rates as compared to the open approach. Concurrent bilateral native nephrectomy at the time of transplantation can be considered in patients with renal mass and polycystic kidney disease, especially if no residual urinary output is present. Patients with localized disease and successful radical nephrectomy do not require immunosuppression adjustment. In metastatic cases, mTOR agents can ensure efficient antitumoral response, while maintaining proper immunosuppression in order to protect the graft. CONCLUSIONS Post-transplant renal cancer of the native kidneys is a frequent occurrence. Radical nephrectomy is most frequently performed for localized renal masses. A standardized and widely-approved screening strategy for malignancies of native renal units is yet to be implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Andras
- Servicio de Urología, Universidad de Medicina y Farmacia «Iuliu Hatieganu», Hospital Municipal Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
| | - A Pecoraro
- Unidad de Cirugía Robótica Urológica y Trasplante Renal, Universidad de Florencia, Hospital de Careggi, Florencia, Italy; Grupo de Trasplante Renal de la sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos (YAU) de la Asociación Europea de Urología (EAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - T Telecan
- Servicio de Urología, Universidad de Medicina y Farmacia «Iuliu Hatieganu», Hospital Municipal Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - A Piana
- Grupo de Trasplante Renal de la sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos (YAU) de la Asociación Europea de Urología (EAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands; Sección de Urología, Servicio de Oncología, Facultad de Medicina, Hospital San Luigi, Universidad de Turín, Orbassano, Turín, Italy
| | - R Boissier
- Grupo de Trasplante Renal de la sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos (YAU) de la Asociación Europea de Urología (EAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands; Servicio de Urología y Trasplante Renal, Hospital Universitario La Concepción, Marsella, France
| | - V Hevia
- Grupo de Trasplante Renal de la sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos (YAU) de la Asociación Europea de Urología (EAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands; Servicio de Urología, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain
| | - T Prudhomme
- Grupo de Trasplante Renal de la sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos (YAU) de la Asociación Europea de Urología (EAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands; Servicio de Urología, Trasplante Renal y Andrología, Hospital Universitario de Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - D Amparore
- Sección de Urología, Servicio de Oncología, Facultad de Medicina, Hospital San Luigi, Universidad de Turín, Orbassano, Turín, Italy; Grupo de trabajo de Cáncer Renal de la sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos (YAU) de la Asociación Europea de Urología (EAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - R Bertolo
- Grupo de trabajo de Cáncer Renal de la sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos (YAU) de la Asociación Europea de Urología (EAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands; Servicio de Urología, Hospital San Carlo Di Nancy, Roma, Italy
| | - U Carbonara
- Grupo de trabajo de Cáncer Renal de la sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos (YAU) de la Asociación Europea de Urología (EAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands; Servicio de Emergencias y Trasplante de Órganos, Unidad de Urología, Andrología y Trasplante Renal, Universidad de Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - S Erdem
- Grupo de trabajo de Cáncer Renal de la sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos (YAU) de la Asociación Europea de Urología (EAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands; Sección de Oncología Urológica, Servicio de Urología, Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad de Estambul, Estambul, Turkey
| | - P Diana
- Grupo de trabajo de Cáncer Renal de la sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos (YAU) de la Asociación Europea de Urología (EAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands; Servicio de Urología, Instituto Clínico y de Investigación Humanitas ICCRS, Rozzano, Italy; Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Ingels
- Grupo de trabajo de Cáncer Renal de la sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos (YAU) de la Asociación Europea de Urología (EAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands; Servicio de Urología, APHP, Hospital Universitario Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - O Kara
- Grupo de trabajo de Cáncer Renal de la sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos (YAU) de la Asociación Europea de Urología (EAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands; Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Henri Mondor, APHP, Créteil, France
| | - L Marandino
- Grupo de trabajo de Cáncer Renal de la sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos (YAU) de la Asociación Europea de Urología (EAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands; Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital ICCRS San Raffaele, Universidad Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milán, Italy
| | - M Marchioni
- Grupo de trabajo de Cáncer Renal de la sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos (YAU) de la Asociación Europea de Urología (EAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands; Departamento de Ciencias Médicas, Orales y Biotecnológicas, Laboratorio de Biostadística, Universidad «G. D'Annunzio» Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy; Servicio de Urología, Hospital SS Annunziata, Universidad «G. D'Annunzio» de Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - S Muselaers
- Grupo de trabajo de Cáncer Renal de la sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos (YAU) de la Asociación Europea de Urología (EAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands; Servicio de Urología, Centro Médico de la Universidad de Radboud, Nimega, The Netherlands
| | - N Pavan
- Grupo de trabajo de Cáncer Renal de la sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos (YAU) de la Asociación Europea de Urología (EAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands; Clínica de Urología, Departamento de Ciencias Médicas, Quirúrgicas y de la Salud, Universidad de Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - A Pecoraro
- Sección de Urología, Servicio de Oncología, Facultad de Medicina, Hospital San Luigi, Universidad de Turín, Orbassano, Turín, Italy; Grupo de trabajo de Cáncer Renal de la sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos (YAU) de la Asociación Europea de Urología (EAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - E Roussel
- Grupo de trabajo de Cáncer Renal de la sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos (YAU) de la Asociación Europea de Urología (EAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands; Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Lovaina, Lovaina, Belgium
| | - N Crisan
- Servicio de Urología, Universidad de Medicina y Farmacia «Iuliu Hatieganu», Hospital Municipal Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - A Territo
- Grupo de Trasplante Renal de la sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos (YAU) de la Asociación Europea de Urología (EAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands; Servicio de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - R Campi
- Unidad de Cirugía Robótica Urológica y Trasplante Renal, Universidad de Florencia, Hospital de Careggi, Florencia, Italy; Grupo de trabajo de Cáncer Renal de la sección de Jóvenes Urólogos Académicos (YAU) de la Asociación Europea de Urología (EAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands; Departamento de Medicina Experimental y Clínica, Universidad de Florencia, Florencia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Fiori C, Cossu M, Poggio M, Quarà A, Di Dio M, De Luca S, Checcucci E, Manfredi M, Amparore D, Porpiglia F. Initial experience with robot-assisted ureteroscopy with Ily® Robot. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023; 75:761-765. [PMID: 38126287 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.23.05572-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study is to present the first Italian experience with robotic-assisted retrograde intrarenal surgery (rRIRS) using the Ily® platform. Procedures were performed for renal stones using the Ily® Robot (STERLAB, Vallauris, France), which is a ureteroscope holder with multiple degrees of freedom that can be controlled remotely through a wireless controller. In March 2023, consecutive patients with indications for rRIRS were included in the study. Demographic variables and stone characteristics were collected, and standard perioperative data were assessed. The one-month stone-free rate (SFR, i.e. no residual fragments) was evaluated using ultrasound. All participating surgeons filled out a Surgeons' Satisfaction Questionnaire (SSQ) based on a Likert-type scale. The questionnaire focused on: 1) ease of use; 2) ergonomics during renal cavity exploration; 3) stability during stone fragmentation. Among the patients, one had bilateral stones, while two had stones on the right side. The mean stone size was 13 mm. The average operative time was 70 minutes and the mean docking time was three minutes. No perioperative complications were recorded, and all patients were discharged on the first postoperative day. The one-month SFR was 100%. The SSQ scores were as follows: 1) ease of use: 4/5; 2) ergonomics: 5/5; 3) stability during stone fragmentation: 5/5. Based on the initial experience, the results indicate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of rRIRS. The ergonomic efficiency of the system was highly appreciated by the surgeons. While a cost-effectiveness analysis within clinical trials is necessary, rRIRS shows the potential for a more sustainable future for endoscopists and an improved workplace environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristian Fiori
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy -
- Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy -
| | - Marco Cossu
- Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Alberto Quarà
- Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Michele Di Dio
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, SS Annunziata Hospital, Cosenza, Italy
| | - Stefano De Luca
- Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Matteo Manfredi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gandaglia G, Barletta F, Robesti D, Scuderi S, Rajwa P, Gomez Rivas J, Ibanez L, Soeterik TFW, Bianchi L, Afferi L, Kesch C, Darr C, Guo H, Zhuang J, Zattoni F, Fendler W, Marra G, Stabile A, Amparore D, Huebner NA, Giesen A, Joniau S, Schiavina R, Brunocilla E, Mattei A, Dal Moro F, Sierra JM, Porpiglia F, Picchio M, van den Bergh R, Shariat SF, Montorsi F, Briganti A. Identification of the Optimal Candidates for Nodal Staging with Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Among Prostate Cancer Patients Who Underwent Preoperative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography. External Validation of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Briganti Nomograms and Development of a Novel Tool. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:543-552. [PMID: 37270378 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the therapeutic role of extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) is still under debate, this procedure is recommended for staging purposes in selected cases. Nomograms for predicting lymph node invasion (LNI) do not account for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, which is characterized by a high negative predictive value for nodal metastases. OBJECTIVE To externally validate models predicting LNI in patients with miN0M0 PCa at PSMA PET and to develop a novel tool in this setting. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Overall, 458 patients with miN0M0 disease undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) and ePLND at 12 centers between 2017 and 2022 were identified. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES Available tools were externally validated using calibration plots, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and decision curve analyses to assess calibration, discrimination, and the net benefit. A novel coefficient-based model was developed, internally validated, and compared with available tools. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 53 patients (12%) had LNI. The AUC was 69% for the Briganti 2012, 64% for the Briganti 2017, 73% for the Briganti 2019, and 66% for the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging stage, biopsy grade group 5, the diameter of the index lesion, and the percentage of positive cores at systematic biopsy were independent predictors of LNI (all p ≤ 0.04). Internal cross-validation confirmed a coefficient-based model with AUC of 78%, better calibration, and a higher net benefit in comparison to the other nomograms assessed. Use of a 5% cutoff would have spared 47% ePLND procedures (vs 13% for the Briganti 2019 nomogram) at the cost of missing only 2.1% LNI cases . The lack of central review of imaging and pathology represents the main limitation. CONCLUSIONS Tools for predicting LNI are associated with suboptimal performance for men with miN0M0 PCa. We propose a novel model for predicting LNI that outperforms available tools in this population. PATIENT SUMMARY Tools currently used to predict lymph node invasion (LNI) in prostate cancer are not optimal for men with negative node findings on PET (positron emission tomography) scans, leading to a high number of unnecessary extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) procedures. A novel tool should be used in clinical practice to identify candidates for ePLND to reduce the risk of unnecessary procedures without missing LNI cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Robesti
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Scuderi
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Juan Gomez Rivas
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Ibanez
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Timo F W Soeterik
- Department of Urology, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lorenzo Bianchi
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Luca Afferi
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Claudia Kesch
- Department of Urology, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christopher Darr
- Department of Urology, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Hongqian Guo
- Department of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, China
| | - Junlong Zhuang
- Department of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, China
| | - Fabio Zattoni
- Department Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Wolfgang Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- University Hospital S. Giovanni Battista, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Nicolai A Huebner
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexander Giesen
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Eugenio Brunocilla
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Agostino Mattei
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Fabrizio Dal Moro
- Department Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Porpiglia
- University Hospital S. Giovanni Battista, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Maria Picchio
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Saitta C, Afari JA, Autorino R, Capitanio U, Porpiglia F, Amparore D, Piramide F, Cerrato C, Meagher MF, Noyes SL, Pandolfo SD, Buffi NM, Larcher A, Hakimi K, Nguyen MV, Puri D, Diana P, Fasulo V, Saita A, Lughezzani G, Casale P, Antonelli A, Montorsi F, Lane BR, Derweesh IH. Development of a novel score (RENSAFE) to determine probability of acute kidney injury and renal functional decline post surgery: A multicenter analysis. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:487.e15-487.e23. [PMID: 37880003 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To create and validate 2 models called RENSAFE (RENalSAFEty) to predict postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) and development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3b in patients undergoing partial (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN) for kidney cancer. METHODS Primary objective was to develop a predictive model for AKI (reduction >25% of preoperative eGFR) and de novo CKD≥3b (<45 ml/min/1.73m2), through stepwise logistic regression. Secondary outcomes include elucidation of the relationship between AKI and de novo CKD≥3a (<60 ml/min/1.73m2). Accuracy was tested with receiver operator characteristic area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS AKI occurred in 452/1,517 patients (29.8%) and CKD≥3b in 116/903 patients (12.8%). Logistic regression demonstrated male sex (OR = 1.3, P = 0.02), ASA score (OR = 1.3, P < 0.01), hypertension (OR = 1.6, P < 0.001), R.E.N.A.L. score (OR = 1.2, P < 0.001), preoperative eGFR<60 (OR = 1.8, P = 0.009), and RN (OR = 10.4, P < 0.0001) as predictors for AKI. Age (OR 1.0, P < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (OR 2.5, P < 0.001), preoperative eGFR <60 (OR 3.6, P < 0.001) and RN (OR 2.2, P < 0.01) were predictors for CKD≥3b. AUC for RENSAFE AKI was 0.80 and 0.76 for CKD≥3b. AKI was predictive for CKD≥3a (OR = 2.2, P < 0.001), but not CKD≥3b (P = 0.1). Using 21% threshold probability for AKI achieved sensitivity: 80.3%, specificity: 61.7% and negative predictive value (NPV): 88.1%. Using 8% cutoff for CKD≥3b achieved sensitivity: 75%, specificity: 65.7%, and NPV: 96%. CONCLUSION RENSAFE models utilizing perioperative variables that can predict AKI and CKD may help guide shared decision making. Impact of postsurgical AKI was limited to less severe CKD (eGFR<60 ml/min 71.73m2). Confirmatory studies are requisite.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cesare Saitta
- University of California: San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA; Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Jonathan A Afari
- University of California: San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | | | - Umberto Capitanio
- Department of Urology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Federico Piramide
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Clara Cerrato
- University of California: San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA; Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Sabrina L Noyes
- Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI
| | | | - Nicolò M Buffi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | | | - Kevin Hakimi
- University of California: San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | - Mimi V Nguyen
- University of California: San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | - Dhruv Puri
- University of California: San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA
| | - Pietro Diana
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Vittorio Fasulo
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Alberto Saita
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Giovanni Lughezzani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Paolo Casale
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Brian R Lane
- Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Roussel E, Amparore D, Bertolo R, Pecoraro A, Campi R, Mottrie A. "Sutureless success:" can new devices make renorrhaphy after partial nephrectomy obsolete? Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023; 75:788-790. [PMID: 38126295 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.23.05642-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Eduard Roussel
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Urology, OLV Hospital Aalst, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy -
| | - Riccardo Bertolo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessio Pecoraro
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Piana A, Pecoraro A, Dönmez MI, Prudhomme T, Bañuelos Marco B, López Abad A, Campi R, Boissier R, Checcucci E, Amparore D, Porpiglia F, Breda A, Territo A. New frontiers in kidney transplantation: Towards the extended reality. Actas Urol Esp 2023:S2173-5786(23)00133-6. [PMID: 37981169 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2023.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- A Piana
- Departmento de Urología, Universidad de Turín, Turín, Italy; Servicio de Urología, Hospital Romolo, Rocca di Neto, Italy.
| | - A Pecoraro
- Departmento de Medicina Experimental y Clínica, Universidad de Florencia, Florencia, Italy
| | - M I Dönmez
- Departmento de Urología, Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad de Estambul, Estambul, Turkey
| | - T Prudhomme
- Servicio de Urología, Trasplante Renal y Andrología, Hospital Universitario de Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - B Bañuelos Marco
- Sección de Trasplante Renal y Urología Reconstructiva, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - A López Abad
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain; Departmento de Medicina Experimental y Clínica, Universidad de Florencia, Florencia, Italy
| | - R Campi
- Departmento de Medicina Experimental y Clínica, Universidad de Florencia, Florencia, Italy
| | - R Boissier
- Servicio de Urología y Trasplante Renal, Hospital Universitario La Conception, Marsella, France
| | - E Checcucci
- Servicio de Cirugía, Instituto de Candiolo FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turín, Italy
| | - D Amparore
- Departmento de Urología, Universidad de Turín, Turín, Italy
| | - F Porpiglia
- Departmento de Urología, Universidad de Turín, Turín, Italy
| | - A Breda
- Unidad de Uro-oncología y Trasplante Renal, Servicio de Urología, Fundación Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Territo
- Unidad de Uro-oncología y Trasplante Renal, Servicio de Urología, Fundación Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sica M, Piazzolla P, Amparore D, Verri P, De Cillis S, Piramide F, Volpi G, Piana A, Di Dio M, Alba S, Gatti C, Burgio M, Busacca G, Giordano A, Fiori C, Porpiglia F, Checcucci E. 3D Model Artificial Intelligence-Guided Automatic Augmented Reality Images during Robotic Partial Nephrectomy. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3454. [PMID: 37998590 PMCID: PMC10670293 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13223454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
More than ever, precision surgery is making its way into modern surgery for functional organ preservation. This is possible mainly due to the increasing number of technologies available, including 3D models, virtual reality, augmented reality, and artificial intelligence. Intraoperative surgical navigation represents an interesting application of these technologies, allowing to understand in detail the surgical anatomy, planning a patient-tailored approach. Automatic superimposition comes into this context to optimally perform surgery as accurately as possible. Through a dedicated software (the first version) called iKidney, it is possible to superimpose the images using 3D models and live endoscopic images during partial nephrectomy, targeting the renal mass only. The patient is 31 years old with a 28 mm totally endophytic right-sided renal mass, with a PADUA score of 9. Thanks to the automatic superimposition and selective clamping, an enucleoresection of the renal mass alone was performed with no major postoperative complication (i.e., Clavien-Dindo < 2). iKidney-guided partial nephrectomy is safe, feasible, and yields excellent results in terms of organ preservation and functional outcomes. Further validation studies are needed to improve the prototype software, particularly to improve the rotational axes and avoid human help. Furthermore, it is important to reduce the costs associated with these technologies to increase its use in smaller hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Sica
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (D.A.); (P.V.); (S.D.C.); (F.P.); (A.P.); (M.B.); (G.B.); (A.G.); (C.F.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Pietro Piazzolla
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (P.P.); (G.V.); (C.G.)
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (D.A.); (P.V.); (S.D.C.); (F.P.); (A.P.); (M.B.); (G.B.); (A.G.); (C.F.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Paolo Verri
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (D.A.); (P.V.); (S.D.C.); (F.P.); (A.P.); (M.B.); (G.B.); (A.G.); (C.F.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Sabrina De Cillis
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (D.A.); (P.V.); (S.D.C.); (F.P.); (A.P.); (M.B.); (G.B.); (A.G.); (C.F.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Federico Piramide
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (D.A.); (P.V.); (S.D.C.); (F.P.); (A.P.); (M.B.); (G.B.); (A.G.); (C.F.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Gabriele Volpi
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (P.P.); (G.V.); (C.G.)
| | - Alberto Piana
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (D.A.); (P.V.); (S.D.C.); (F.P.); (A.P.); (M.B.); (G.B.); (A.G.); (C.F.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Michele Di Dio
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, SS Annunziata Hospital, 87100 Cosenza, Italy;
| | | | - Cecilia Gatti
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (P.P.); (G.V.); (C.G.)
| | - Mariano Burgio
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (D.A.); (P.V.); (S.D.C.); (F.P.); (A.P.); (M.B.); (G.B.); (A.G.); (C.F.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Giovanni Busacca
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (D.A.); (P.V.); (S.D.C.); (F.P.); (A.P.); (M.B.); (G.B.); (A.G.); (C.F.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Angelo Giordano
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (D.A.); (P.V.); (S.D.C.); (F.P.); (A.P.); (M.B.); (G.B.); (A.G.); (C.F.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (D.A.); (P.V.); (S.D.C.); (F.P.); (A.P.); (M.B.); (G.B.); (A.G.); (C.F.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (D.A.); (P.V.); (S.D.C.); (F.P.); (A.P.); (M.B.); (G.B.); (A.G.); (C.F.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, 10043 Orbassano, Italy; (D.A.); (P.V.); (S.D.C.); (F.P.); (A.P.); (M.B.); (G.B.); (A.G.); (C.F.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (P.P.); (G.V.); (C.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Campi R, Pecoraro A, Roussel E, Amparore D, Mari A, Montorsi F, Porpiglia F, Albersen M, Capitanio U, Minervini A, Serni S, Bertolo R. Could a Risk-adapted Approach Support Shared Decision-making Regarding Eligibility for Adjuvant Pembrolizumab for Patients with Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma at High Risk of Recurrence? A Multicentre Cohort Study. Eur Urol Oncol 2023:S2588-9311(23)00239-0. [PMID: 37945489 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
The KEYNOTE-564 randomised controlled trial showed a disease-free survival benefit of adjuvant pembrolizumab (aPZB) in comparison to placebo for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) at high risk of recurrence. Despite its recommendation by the European Association of Urology guidelines, the ultimate value of aPZB has recently been questioned. Arguably, patients who might benefit the most from aPZB are those whose probability of RCC recurrence outweighs their probability of dying from other causes over a reasonable timeframe after surgery. To assess the potential impact of this hypothesis on "eligibility" for aPZB, we queried our prospectively collected multi-institutional database for consecutive patients undergoing surgery for nonmetastatic renal masses (cT1-4 N0-1 M0) between 2015 and 2021 to identify ccRCC cases meeting the KEYNOTE-564 criteria. We stratified the patients using the risk-adapted model proposed by Stewart-Merrill et al (whereby stopping follow-up is warranted when the estimated risk of other-cause mortality [OCM] outweighs the estimated risk of RCC recurrence). Then we explored the proportion of patients whose follow-up could theoretically be stopped at 2, 5, 10, or 20 yr, for whom "eligibility" for aPZB might be more controversial. Overall, 1745 patients with ccRCC were included, of whom 419 (24%) met the KEYNOTE-564 criteria. The proportion of patients "not eligible" for aPZB because of higher probability of OCM than of RCC recurrence would have been 81%, 66%, 43%, and 29% at "recommended" follow-up of ≤2.0, ≤5, ≤10, and ≤20 yr, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study providing insights to support shared decision-making regarding eligibility for aPZB for patients with nonmetastatic ccRCC with a focus on patient-related factors beyond tumour-driven prognostic scores. PATIENT SUMMARY: An immunotherapy drug call pembrolizumab given after surgery for nonmetastatic kidney cancer may benefit some patients who have a high risk of disease recurrence, but it can have immune-related side effects. We found that comparing the risk of death from other causes and the risk of cancer recurrence could help in reducing overtreatment of patients who might not benefit from this drug.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
| | - Alessio Pecoraro
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Eduard Roussel
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Maarten Albersen
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Sergio Serni
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Piana A, Chiaravalloti F, Chiaradia F, Greco A, Lauria J, Zappalà G, Cappa M, Pagliarulo V, Pullano C, Checcucci E, Amparore D, Di Dio M, Scarcia M, Porpiglia F, Alba S. A New Concept for Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment in Renal Cancer: The Use of Neuroaxial Anesthesia During Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 57:16-21. [PMID: 37780175 PMCID: PMC10539894 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
A new concept for minimally invasive treatment involves abdominal laparoscopic surgery performed while the patient breathes independently without losing consciousness. Here we report the first series of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) performed under neuroaxial anesthesia (NA). From May 2021 to September 2022 we prospectively enrolled selected patients with an organ-confined single renal mass to undergo LPN under NA. Anesthesia was administered using an epidural catheter placed at the level of T7, with additional anesthesia at the level of T10. The rationale was to avoid use of a tracheal tube and the side effects of general anesthesia. Ten patients were enrolled in the study. Targeted sedation was achieved in all cases. In one case, a switch to general anesthesia was needed because of patient anxiety. Food intake started at 12 h after surgery in 9/10 cases; mobilization started from 3 h after surgery. The length of hospital stay was 3 d in 4/10 cases and 4 d in 3/10 cases. This first experience worldwide of LPN performed under NA demonstrates the feasibility and safety of the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Piana
- Department of Urology, Romolo Hospital, Rocca di Neto, Italy
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | - Antonio Greco
- Department of Urology, Romolo Hospital, Rocca di Neto, Italy
| | - Jacopo Lauria
- Department of Urology, Romolo Hospital, Rocca di Neto, Italy
| | - Giulio Zappalà
- Department of Urology, Romolo Hospital, Rocca di Neto, Italy
| | - Manlio Cappa
- Department of Urology, Romolo Hospital, Rocca di Neto, Italy
| | | | | | - Enrico Checcucci
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Michele Di Dio
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Annunziata Hospital, Cosenza, Italy
| | - Marcello Scarcia
- Urology Department, General Regional Hospital F. Miulli, Acquaviva Delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Stefano Alba
- Department of Urology, Romolo Hospital, Rocca di Neto, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Zattoni F, Pereira LJP, Marra G, Valerio M, Olivier J, Puche-Sanz I, Rajwa P, Maggi M, Campi R, Amparore D, De Cillis S, Junlong Z, Guo H, La Bombarda G, Fuschi A, Veccia A, Ditonno F, Marquis A, Barletta F, Leni R, Serni S, Kasivisvanathan V, Antonelli A, Dal Moro F, Rivas JG, van den Bergh RCN, Briganti A, Gandaglia G, Novara G. The impact of a second MRI and re-biopsy in patients with initial negative mpMRI-targeted and systematic biopsy for PIRADS ≥ 3 lesions. World J Urol 2023; 41:3357-3366. [PMID: 37755520 PMCID: PMC10632220 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04578-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the proportions of detected prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant PCa (csPCa), as well as identify clinical predictors of PCa, in patients with PI-RADS > = 3 lesion at mpMRI and initial negative targeted and systematic biopsy (initial biopsy) who underwent a second MRI and a re-biopsy. METHODS A total of 290 patients from 10 tertiary referral centers were included. The primary outcome measures were the presence of PCa and csPCa at re-biopsy. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate predictors of PCa and csPCa, adjusting for relevant covariates. RESULTS Forty-two percentage of patients exhibited the presence of a new lesion. Furthermore, at the second MRI, patients showed stable, upgrading, and downgrading PI-RADS lesions in 42%, 39%, and 19%, respectively. The interval from the initial to repeated mpMRI and from the initial to repeated biopsy was 16 mo (IQR 12-20) and 18 mo (IQR 12-21), respectively. One hundred and eight patients (37.2%) were diagnosed with PCa and 74 (25.5%) with csPCa at re-biopsy. The presence of ASAP on the initial biopsy strongly predicted the presence of PCa and csPCa at re-biopsy. Furthermore, PI-RADS scores at the first and second MRI and a higher number of systematic biopsy cores at first and second biopsy were independent predictors of the presence of PCa and csPCa. Selection bias cannot be ruled out. CONCLUSIONS Persistent PI-RADS ≥ 3 at the second MRI is suggestive of the presence of a not negligible proportion of csPca. These findings contribute to the refinement of risk stratification for men with initial negative MRI-TBx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Zattoni
- Urologic Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
| | | | - Giancarlo Marra
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Department of Urology, Geneva University Hospital, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Ignacio Puche-Sanz
- Department of Urology, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria Ibs.Granada, Hospital Universitario Virgen de Las Nieves (HUVN), Granada, Spain
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Martina Maggi
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Latina, Italy
- Urology Unit, Department of Medico, Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- School of Medicine, Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
- School of Medicine, Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Sabrina De Cillis
- School of Medicine, Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
- School of Medicine, Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Zhuang Junlong
- Institute of Urology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
- Department of Urology, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Hongqian Guo
- Institute of Urology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
- Department of Urology, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Giulia La Bombarda
- Urologic Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Andrea Fuschi
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Latina, Italy
- Urology Unit, Department of Medico, Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Veccia
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Marquis
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Leni
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Sergio Serni
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Dal Moro
- Urologic Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Juan Gomez Rivas
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Novara
- Urologic Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Grosso AA, Amparore D, Di Maida F, de Cillis S, Cocci A, Di Dio M, Russo GI, Cimino S, Quarà A, Salvi M, Fiori C, Mari A, Porpiglia F, Minervini A, Tuccio A. Comparison of perioperative and short-terms outcomes of en-bloc Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: a propensity-score matching analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2023:10.1038/s41391-023-00743-6. [PMID: 37857831 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00743-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) has seen an evolution during the last decades. On one hand, en-bloc HoLEP emerged as a valid endoscopic treatment regardless prostate size. On the other hand, robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) has gained attention in larger prostates showing encouraging results. Herein, for the first time in the scientific scenario, we sought to compare the outcomes of RASP and en-bloc HoLEP cases after propensity-score matching (PSM) analysis. METHODS We retrospectively queried our prospectively database of patients treated with HoLEP or RASP between 2017 and 2022 among two high-volume centers. PSM was applied based on the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire, prostate volume and max-flow rate. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon per center. Outcomes were assessed at 1, 3, and 6-month postoperatively and therefore annually. Trifecta definition was used to assess "success" in surgical procedures and was defined as the contemporary presence of: a) no postoperative complications within the first postoperative month; b) 1-month postoperative Qmax >15 ml/s and c) no urinary incontinence at 3-month evaluation. RESULTS Overall, 48 HoLEP and 47 RASPs were matched. Operative time, hospitalization time (median 4 vs 5 days) and catheterization time (median 3 vs 2 day) were found to be shorter in the HoLEP group as compared to the counterpart (p < 0.05). Early postoperative complication rate was also lower in the HoLEP cohort (6.2% vs 12.6%; p = 0.03) as well as postoperative haemoglobine blood level drop (1.4 vs 2.4 g/dL; p = 0.03). On the other hand, postoperative antegrade ejaculation (55.3% vs 6.8%) 1-month max flow (median 28 vs 24 ml/sec) and continence rates (0% vs 20.8%) favored RASP (p < 0.05). Overall, Trifecta rate was similar in the two groups (76.1% vs 82.6%). CONCLUSION Both HoLEP and RASP are safe and effective treatments for symptomatic BPH. HoLEP demonstrated to have lower perioperative risks while is affecting by a higher probability of transient early UI. On the other hand, RASP is more effective in reducing postoperative ejaculatory dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Andrea Grosso
- Department of experimental and clinical Medicine-University of Florence; Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Maida
- Department of experimental and clinical Medicine-University of Florence; Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Sabrina de Cillis
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Cocci
- Department of experimental and clinical Medicine-University of Florence; Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Michele Di Dio
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, SS Annunziata Hospital, Cosenza, Italy
| | | | | | - Alberto Quarà
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Matteo Salvi
- Department of experimental and clinical Medicine-University of Florence; Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of experimental and clinical Medicine-University of Florence; Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of experimental and clinical Medicine-University of Florence; Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Agostino Tuccio
- Department of experimental and clinical Medicine-University of Florence; Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Checcucci E, Piana A, Volpi G, Piazzolla P, Amparore D, De Cillis S, Piramide F, Gatti C, Stura I, Bollito E, Massa F, Di Dio M, Fiori C, Porpiglia F. Three-dimensional automatic artificial intelligence driven augmented-reality selective biopsy during nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A feasibility and accuracy study. Asian J Urol 2023; 10:407-415. [PMID: 38024433 PMCID: PMC10659972 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 05/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the accuracy of our new three-dimensional (3D) automatic augmented reality (AAR) system guided by artificial intelligence in the identification of tumour's location at the level of the preserved neurovascular bundle (NVB) at the end of the extirpative phase of nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Methods In this prospective study, we enrolled patients with prostate cancer (clinical stages cT1c-3, cN0, and cM0) with a positive index lesion at target biopsy, suspicious for capsular contact or extracapsular extension at preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Patients underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital (Orbassano, Turin, Italy), from December 2020 to December 2021. At the end of extirpative phase, thanks to our new AAR artificial intelligence driven system, the virtual prostate 3D model allowed to identify the tumour's location at the level of the preserved NVB and to perform a selective excisional biopsy, sparing the remaining portion of the bundle. Perioperative and postoperative data were evaluated, especially focusing on the positive surgical margin (PSM) rates, potency, continence recovery, and biochemical recurrence. Results Thirty-four patients were enrolled. In 15 (44.1%) cases, the target lesion was in contact with the prostatic capsule at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (Wheeler grade L2) while in 19 (55.9%) cases extracapsular extension was detected (Wheeler grade L3). 3D AAR guided biopsies were negative in all pathological tumour stage 2 (pT2) patients while they revealed the presence of cancer in 14 cases in the pT3 cohort (14/16; 87.5%). PSM rates were 0% and 7.1% in the pathological stages pT2 and pT3 (<3 mm, Gleason score 3), respectively. Conclusion With the proposed 3D AAR system, it is possible to correctly identify the lesion's location on the NVB in 87.5% of pT3 patients and perform a 3D-guided tailored nerve-sparing even in locally advanced diseases, without compromising the oncological safety in terms of PSM rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Checcucci
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Alberto Piana
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, To, Italy
| | - Gabriele Volpi
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Pietro Piazzolla
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, To, Italy
| | - Sabrina De Cillis
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, To, Italy
| | - Federico Piramide
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, To, Italy
| | - Cecilia Gatti
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, To, Italy
| | - Ilaria Stura
- Department of Public Health and Pediatric Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Turin, Italy
| | - Enrico Bollito
- Department of Pathology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Federica Massa
- Department of Pathology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Michele Di Dio
- SS Annunziata Hospital, Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Cosenza, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, To, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, To, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Anceschi U, Amparore D, Prata F, Tedesco F, Cacciatore L, Checcucci E, Bove AM, DE Cillis S, Iannuzzi A, Quarà A, Ragusa A, Ortenzi M, Flammia RS, Zampa A, Misuraca L, Tuderti G, Brassetti A, Ferriero M, Mastroianni R, Tufano A, Fiori C, Porpiglia F, Gallucci M, Simone G. Predictors of mid-term functional outcomes for robot-assisted Madigan simple prostatectomy: results of a multicentric series according to the BPH-6 achievement. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023; 75:607-615. [PMID: 37728496 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.23.05373-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND BPH-6 achievement remains an objective far to be evaluated for every technique currently available for the surgical management of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) with the goal of preserving ejaculatory function. The aim of this study was to evaluate predictors of BPH-6 achievement of urethral-sparing robot assisted simple prostatectomy (us-RASP) on a large series performed at two tertiary-care centers. METHODS Two institutional us-RASP datasets were merged, considering eligible all patients with a follow-up >12 months. Baseline, perioperative and functional data according to BPH-6 endpoint were assessed. Descriptive analysis was used. Frequencies and proportions were reported for categorical variables while medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) were reported for continuously coded variables. A logistic regression model was built to identify predictors of BPH-6 achievement. For all statistical analyses, a two-sided P<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS Study cohort consisted of 94 eligible patients. The median follow-up was 40.7 months (IQR 31.3-54.2). Overall BPH-6 achievement was 54.7%. Compared to baseline, reduction of ≥30% in IPSS was observed in 93.6% of patients, reduction of <6 points for SHIM in 95.7% and response to MSHQ-EjD question 3 indicating emission of semen in 72.6%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, prostate volume between 110-180 mL (OR 0.09; 95% CI 0.01-0.92; P=0.043) and higher preoperative SHIM score (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.05-1.32; P<0.01) were independent predictors of BPH-6 metric achievement. CONCLUSIONS us-RASP may provide a complete resolution of BOO and preservation of ejaculatory function in sexually active men with a prostate volume ranging 110-180 mL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umberto Anceschi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy -
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Prata
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Tedesco
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Loris Cacciatore
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Alfredo M Bove
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Sabrina DE Cillis
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Iannuzzi
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Quarà
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Alberto Ragusa
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Ortenzi
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Rocco S Flammia
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Ashanti Zampa
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Leonardo Misuraca
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Tuderti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Aldo Brassetti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Riccardo Mastroianni
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Tufano
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Michele Gallucci
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Borregales LD, Pecoraro A, Roussel E, Mari A, Grosso AA, Checcucci E, Montorsi F, Larcher A, Van Poppel H, Porpiglia F, Capitanio U, Minervini A, Albersen M, Serni S, Amparore D, Campi R. Morbidity of elective surgery for localized renal masses among elderly patients: A contemporary multicenter study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023; 49:107014. [PMID: 37573666 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2023] [Revised: 07/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aging population and the incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are increasing worldwide. Over 25% of newly diagnosed LRM (localized renal masses) occur in patients over the eighth decade of life. The decision-making and treatment approach to LRM in this population represents a clinical dilemma due to inherited decreased functional reserve and competing mortality risks. Current literature reports conflicting evidence regarding age as a risk factor for worst surgical outcomes. As such, we aimed to evaluate the contemporary morbidity of elective surgery for LRM among elderly patients, focusing on intraoperative and postoperative complications. METHODS After Ethical Committee approval, we queried our prospectively maintained databases to identify patients with preoperative eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m [(David and Bloom, 2022) 22 and a normal contralateral kidney who underwent partial or radical nephrectomy (PN or RN) for a single cT1-T2N0M0 LRM between 1/2015-12/2021 at four high-volume European Academic Institutions. Patients were categorized by age groups: <50 yrs (young) vs. 50-75 (middle-aged) yrs vs.> 75 yrs (elderly). Postoperative complications were recorded according to Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification. The primary objectives were the proportion of patients experiencing intraoperative (IOC), any grade (AGC), and high-grade postoperative complications (HGC), defined as CD grade 3-5. RESULTS Overall, 2469/3076 (80.2%) patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 363 (14.7%) were young, 1682 (68.1%) were middle-aged, and 424 (17.2%) were elderly. Compared to middle-aged and young patients, elderly patients had a higher median Charlson Comorbidity Index (6 vs. 4 vs. 0, p < 0.01) and a higher proportion of cT1 renal mass (87.6% vs. 93.0% vs. 93.6%, p < 0.01). No differences among the study groups were found regarding surgical approach (open vs. minimally-invasive) and type of surgery (PN vs. RN). We found that older patients experienced similar IOC (4.5% vs. 4.2% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.7) and AGC (23.1% vs. 20.0% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.4) compared to middle-aged and young patients, respectively. Similarly, there were no significant differences in HGC between the study cohorts (0.7% vs. 1.4% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.8). At multivariable analysis, open approach and PN significantly predicted the occurrence of AGCs, while only the open surgical approach was associated with the occurrence of HGCs. CONCLUSION In kidney cancer tertiary referral centers, the risk of IOC and postoperative HGC after PN or RN for localized renal masses (LRM) is low, despite a non-negligible risk of AGC, especially in elderly patients. Further efforts should focus on identifying multidisciplinary strategies to select patients most likely to benefit from surgery among elderly candidates with LRMs and decrease the morbidity of surgery in this specific setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo D Borregales
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alessio Pecoraro
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Eduard Roussel
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands
| | - Andrea Mari
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Antonio Andrea Grosso
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Maarten Albersen
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sergio Serni
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Amparore D, Piramide F, Checcucci E, Verri P, De Cillis S, Piana A, Volpi G, Busacca G, Colombo M, Fiori C, Porpiglia F. Three-dimensional Virtual Models of the Kidney with Colored Perfusion Regions: A New Algorithm-based Tool for Optimizing the Clamping Strategy During Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2023; 84:418-425. [PMID: 37117108 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An empirical selective clamping strategy based on the direction of the arterial branches can lead to failures during partial nephrectomy, even when assisted by three-dimensional virtual models (3DVMs). OBJECTIVE To develop and test new 3DVMs that include kidney perfusion regions and evaluate their intraoperative accuracy in guiding selective clamping and their impact on postoperative renal function. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS For patients with a kidney suitable for nephron-sparing surgery, 3DVMs were supplemented with a Voronoi diagram, a Euclidean distance-based mathematical tool, to calculate vascular-dominant regions the kidney. SURGICAL PROCEDURE Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy guided by perfusion-region (PR)-3DVMs. MEASUREMENTS All anatomic information given by the PR-3DVMs was collected. Selective or superselective clamping was planned and performed intraoperatively when feasible under 3DVM assistance. Changes in split renal function (SRF) and estimated renal plasmatic flow (ERPF) were evaluated for 51 patients who underwent baseline and 3-mo postoperative renal scintigraphy. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 103 patients were prospectively enrolled. The median number of kidney and tumor perfusion regions were 8 (interquartile range [IQR] 7-10) and 3 (IQR 2-3), respectively. A clampless, selective clamping, and global clamping strategy was applied in eight (7.8%), 79 (76.6%), and 16 (15.5%) cases, respectively, with no differences between planning and surgery in terms of the number or order of arteries clamped or the perfusion regions that underwent ischemia. Among the 51 patients who underwent renal scintigraphy, the mean SRF decreased by 11.3%, 7.7%, and 1.7% after global, selective, and superselective clamping, respectively (p = 0.004). Similar results were obtained for ERPF (18.9%, 9.9%, and 6.0%; p = 0.02). The main limitation is the need for a bioengineer to manually refine the 3DVMs. CONCLUSIONS Use of mathematical algorithms for 3DVMs allows precise estimation of kidney perfusion regions to maximize the efficacy of selective clamping and minimize renal function impairment. PATIENT SUMMARY Three-dimensional models that include regions of blood flow to the kidney can be used to guide clamping of blood vessels when part of the kidney is being surgically removed. More limited clamping can reduce damage to the remaining portion of the kidney and result in better recovery of kidney function after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Italy.
| | - Federico Piramide
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Paolo Verri
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Sabrina De Cillis
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Alberto Piana
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Gabriele Volpi
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Giovanni Busacca
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Marco Colombo
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Roussel E, Amparore D, Bertolo R, Erdem S, Marchioni M, Pavan N, Campi R. Renal cell carcinoma with non-clear cell histologies: all the same peas in one pod? Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023; 75:529-531. [PMID: 37530663 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.23.05433-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Eduard Roussel
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Selçuk Erdem
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Michele Marchioni
- Laboratory of Biostatistics, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. D'Annunzio Chieti-Pescara University, Chieti, Italy
- Department of Urology, SS Annunziata Hospital, G. D'Annunzio Chieti-Pescara University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Nicola Pavan
- Unit of Urology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, P. Giaccone University Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy -
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Di Dio M, Barbuto S, Bisegna C, Bellin A, Boccia M, Amparore D, Verri P, Busacca G, Sica M, De Cillis S, Piramide F, Zaccone V, Piana A, Alba S, Volpi G, Fiori C, Porpiglia F, Checcucci E. Artificial Intelligence-Based Hyper Accuracy Three-Dimensional (HA3D ®) Models in Surgical Planning of Challenging Robotic Nephron-Sparing Surgery: A Case Report and Snapshot of the State-of-the-Art with Possible Future Implications. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2320. [PMID: 37510065 PMCID: PMC10377834 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13142320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 07/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Recently, 3D models (3DM) gained popularity in urology, especially in nephron-sparing interventions (NSI). Up to now, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques alone does not allow us to obtain a 3DM adequate to plan a robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). Integration of AI with computer vision algorithms seems promising as it allows to speed up the process. Herein, we present a 3DM realized with the integration of AI and a computer vision approach (CVA), displaying the utility of AI-based Hyper Accuracy Three-dimensional (HA3D®) models in preoperative planning and intraoperative decision-making process of challenging robotic NSI. A 54-year-old Caucasian female with no past medical history was referred to the urologist for incidental detection of the right renal mass. Preoperative contrast-enhanced abdominal CT confirmed a 35 × 25 mm lesion on the anterior surface of the upper pole (PADUA 7), with no signs of distant metastasis. CT images in DICOM format were processed to obtain a HA3D® model. RAPN was performed using Da Vinci Xi surgical system in a three-arm configuration. The enucleation strategy was achieved after selective clamping of the tumor-feeding artery. Overall operative time was 85 min (14 min of warm ischemia time). No intra-, peri- and post-operative complications were recorded. Histopathological examination revealed a ccRCC (stage pT1aNxMx). AI is breaking new ground in medical image analysis panorama, with enormous potential in organ/tissue classification and segmentation, thus obtaining 3DM automatically and repetitively. Realized with the integration of AI and CVA, the results of our 3DM were accurate as demonstrated during NSI, proving the potentialities of this approach for HA3D® models' reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Di Dio
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, SS Annunziata Hospital, 87100 Cosenza, Italy
| | - Simona Barbuto
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy
| | - Claudio Bisegna
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, SS Annunziata Hospital, 87100 Cosenza, Italy
| | - Andrea Bellin
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy
| | - Mario Boccia
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy
| | - Paolo Verri
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy
| | - Giovanni Busacca
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy
| | - Michele Sica
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy
| | - Sabrina De Cillis
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy
| | - Federico Piramide
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Zaccone
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, SS Annunziata Hospital, 87100 Cosenza, Italy
| | - Alberto Piana
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy
- Romolo Hospital, 88821 Rocca di Neto, Italy
| | | | - Gabriele Volpi
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Distante A, Marandino L, Bertolo R, Ingels A, Pavan N, Pecoraro A, Marchioni M, Carbonara U, Erdem S, Amparore D, Campi R, Roussel E, Caliò A, Wu Z, Palumbo C, Borregales LD, Mulders P, Muselaers CHJ. Artificial Intelligence in Renal Cell Carcinoma Histopathology: Current Applications and Future Perspectives. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2294. [PMID: 37443687 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13132294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is characterized by its diverse histopathological features, which pose possible challenges to accurate diagnosis and prognosis. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to explore recent advancements in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) in RCC pathology. The aim of this paper is to assess whether these advancements hold promise in improving the precision, efficiency, and objectivity of histopathological analysis for RCC, while also reducing costs and interobserver variability and potentially alleviating the labor and time burden experienced by pathologists. The reviewed AI-powered approaches demonstrate effective identification and classification abilities regarding several histopathological features associated with RCC, facilitating accurate diagnosis, grading, and prognosis prediction and enabling precise and reliable assessments. Nevertheless, implementing AI in renal cell carcinoma generates challenges concerning standardization, generalizability, benchmarking performance, and integration of data into clinical workflows. Developing methodologies that enable pathologists to interpret AI decisions accurately is imperative. Moreover, establishing more robust and standardized validation workflows is crucial to instill confidence in AI-powered systems' outcomes. These efforts are vital for advancing current state-of-the-art practices and enhancing patient care in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfredo Distante
- Department of Urology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Roma, Italy
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Laura Marandino
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Bertolo
- Department of Urology, San Carlo Di Nancy Hospital, 00165 Rome, Italy
| | - Alexandre Ingels
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Henri Mondor, APHP (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Nicola Pavan
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Urology, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy
| | - Angela Pecoraro
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, 10043 Turin, Italy
| | - Michele Marchioni
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Umberto Carbonara
- Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation-Urology, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Selcuk Erdem
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul 34093, Turkey
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, 10043 Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation Unit, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50121 Firenze, Italy
| | - Eduard Roussel
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anna Caliò
- Section of Pathology, Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Zhenjie Wu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Carlotta Palumbo
- Division of Urology, Maggiore della Carità Hospital of Novara, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, 13100 Novara, Italy
| | - Leonardo D Borregales
- Department of Urology, Well Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Peter Mulders
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Constantijn H J Muselaers
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Martini A, Wever L, Soeterik TFW, Rakauskas A, Fankhauser CD, Grogg JB, Checcucci E, Amparore D, Haiquel L, Rodriguez-Sanchez L, Ploussard G, Qiang P, Affentranger A, Marquis A, Marra G, Ettala O, Zattoni F, Falagario UG, De Angelis M, Kesch C, Apfelbeck M, Al-Hammouri T, Kretschmer A, Kasivisvanathan V, Preisser F, Lefebvre E, Olivier J, Radtke JP, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Carrieri G, Moro FD, Boström P, Jambor I, Gontero P, Chiu PK, John H, Macek P, Porpiglia F, Hermanns T, van den Bergh RCN, van Basten JPA, Gandaglia G, Valerio M. Unilateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer Patients Diagnosed in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy: A Study That Challenges the Dogma. J Urol 2023; 210:117-127. [PMID: 37052480 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000003442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of radical prostatectomy is the current standard of care if pelvic lymph node dissection is indicated; often, however, pelvic lymph node dissection is performed in pN0 disease. With the more accurate staging achieved with magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsies for prostate cancer diagnosis, the indication for bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection may be revised. We aimed to assess the feasibility of unilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection in the era of modern prostate cancer imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed a multi-institutional data set of men with cN0 disease diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy who underwent prostatectomy and bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection. The outcome of the study was lymph node invasion contralateral to the prostatic lobe with worse disease features, ie, dominant lobe. Logistic regression to predict lymph node invasion contralateral to the dominant lobe was generated and internally validated. RESULTS Overall, data from 2,253 patients were considered. Lymph node invasion was documented in 302 (13%) patients; 83 (4%) patients had lymph node invasion contralateral to the dominant prostatic lobe. A model including prostate-specific antigen, maximum diameter of the index lesion, seminal vesicle invasion on magnetic resonance imaging, International Society of Urological Pathology grade in the nondominant side, and percentage of positive cores in the nondominant side achieved an area under the curve of 84% after internal validation. With a cutoff of contralateral lymph node invasion of 1%, 602 (27%) contralateral pelvic lymph node dissections would be omitted with only 1 (1.2%) lymph node invasion missed. CONCLUSIONS Pelvic lymph node dissection could be omitted contralateral to the prostate lobe with worse disease features in selected patients. We propose a model that can help avoid contralateral pelvic lymph node dissection in almost one-third of cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Martini
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Lieke Wever
- St Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Arnas Rakauskas
- Department of Urology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Josias Bastian Grogg
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Luciano Haiquel
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Peng Qiang
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | | | - Alessandro Marquis
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Otto Ettala
- Department of Urology, Turku University, Turku, Finland
| | - Fabio Zattoni
- Urology Unit, Academical Medical Centre Hospital, Udine, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Mario De Angelis
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Kesch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Tarek Al-Hammouri
- Department of Urology, University College London and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Department of Urology, University College London and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Felix Preisser
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | | | - Jan Philipp Radtke
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Fabrizio Dal Moro
- Urology Unit, Academical Medical Centre Hospital, Udine, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Peter Boström
- Department of Urology, Turku University, Turku, Finland
| | - Ivan Jambor
- Department of Urology, Turku University, Turku, Finland
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Peter K Chiu
- SH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Hubert John
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Petr Macek
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | | | - Thomas Hermanns
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Jean-Paul A van Basten
- St Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Department of Urology, Geneva University Hospital, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Checcucci E, Rosati S, De Cillis S, Giordano N, Volpi G, Granato S, Zamengo D, Verri P, Amparore D, De Luca S, Manfredi M, Fiori C, Di Dio M, Balestra G, Porpiglia F. Machine-Learning-Based Tool to Predict Target Prostate Biopsy Outcomes: An Internal Validation Study. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4358. [PMID: 37445393 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study is to present a personalized predictive model (PPM) with a machine learning (ML) system that is able to identify and classify patients with suspected prostate cancer (PCa) following mpMRI. We extracted all the patients who underwent fusion biopsy (FB) from March 2014 to December 2019, while patients from August 2020 to April 2021 were included as a validation set. The proposed system was based on the following four ML methods: a fuzzy inference system (FIS), the support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and self-organizing maps (SOMs). Then, a system based on fuzzy logic (FL) + SVM was compared with logistic regression (LR) and standard diagnostic tools. A total of 1448 patients were included in the training set, while 181 patients were included in the validation set. The area under the curve (AUC) of the proposed FIS + SVM model was comparable with the LR model but outperformed the other diagnostic tools. The FIS + SVM model demonstrated the best performance, in terms of negative predictive value (NPV), on the training set (78.5%); moreover, it outperformed the LR in terms of specificity (92.1% vs. 83%). Considering the validation set, our model outperformed the other methods in terms of NPV (60.7%), sensitivity (90.8%), and accuracy (69.1%). In conclusion, we successfully developed and validated a PPM tool using the FIS + SVM model to calculate the probability of PCa prior to a prostate FB, avoiding useless ones in 15% of the cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Checcucci
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, 10060 Turin, Italy
| | - Samanta Rosati
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy
| | - Sabrina De Cillis
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, 10043 Turin, Italy
| | - Noemi Giordano
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy
| | - Gabriele Volpi
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, 10060 Turin, Italy
| | - Stefano Granato
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, 10043 Turin, Italy
| | - Davide Zamengo
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, 10043 Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Verri
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, 10043 Turin, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, 10043 Turin, Italy
| | - Stefano De Luca
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, 10043 Turin, Italy
| | - Matteo Manfredi
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, 10043 Turin, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, 10043 Turin, Italy
| | - Michele Di Dio
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Annunziata Hospital, 87100 Cosenza, Italy
| | - Gabriella Balestra
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, 10043 Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Wu Z, Amparore D, Campi R, Erdem S, Bertolo R. Prevention of the "cheese-cutter effect" during renorrhaphy after partial nephrectomy: by modifying available techniques or by just omitting cortical renorrhaphy? Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023; 75:410-412. [PMID: 37221832 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.23.05366-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenjie Wu
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Daniele Amparore
- School of Medicine, Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy -
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Selcuk Erdem
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Pecoraro A, Roussel E, Amparore D, Mari A, Grosso AA, Checcucci E, Montorsi F, Larcher A, Van Poppel H, Porpiglia F, Capitanio U, Minervini A, Albersen M, Serni S, Campi R. New-onset Chronic Kidney Disease After Surgery for Localised Renal Masses in Patients with Two Kidneys and Preserved Renal Function: A Contemporary Multicentre Study. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 52:100-108. [PMID: 37284048 PMCID: PMC10240519 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background There is a lack of evidence on acute kidney injury (AKI) and new-onset chronic kidney disease (CKD) after surgery for localised renal masses (LRMs) in patients with two kidneys and preserved baseline renal function. Objective To evaluate the prevalence and risk of AKI and new-onset clinically significant CKD (csCKD) in patients with a single renal mass and preserved renal function after being treated with partial (PN) or radical (RN) nephrectomy. Design setting and participants We queried our prospectively maintained databases to identify patients with a preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and a normal contralateral kidney who underwent PN or RN for a single LRM (cT1-T2N0M0) between January 2015 and December 2021 at four high-volume academic institutions. Intervention PN or RN. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The outcomes of this study were AKI at hospital discharge and the risk of new-onset csCKD, defined as eGFR <45 ml/min/1.73 m2, during the follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to examine csCKD-free survival according to tumour complexity. A Multivariable logistic regression analysis assessed the predictors of AKI, while a multivariable Cox regression analysis assessed the predictors of csCKD. Sensitivity analyses were performed in patients who underwent PN. Results and limitations Overall, 2469/3076 (80%) patients met the inclusion criteria. At hospital discharge, 371/2469 (15%) developed AKI (8.7% vs 14% vs 31% in patients with low- vs intermediate- vs high-complexity tumours, p < 0.001). At the multivariable analysis, body mass index, history of hypertension, tumour complexity, and RN significantly predicted the occurrence of AKI. Among 1389 (56%) patients with complete follow-up data, 80 events of csCKD were recorded. The estimated csCKD-free survival rates were 97%, 93% and 86% at 12, 36, and 60 mo, respectively, with significant differences between patients with high- versus low-complexity and high- versus intermediate-complexity tumours (p = 0.014 and p = 0.038, respectively). At the Cox regression analysis, age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, preoperative eGFR, tumour complexity, and RN significantly predicted the risk of csCKD during the follow-up. The results were similar in the PN cohort. The main limitation of the study was the lack of data on eGFR trajectories within the 1st year after surgery and on long-term functional outcomes. Conclusions The risk of AKI and de novo csCKD in elective patients with an LRM and preserved baseline renal function is not clinically negligible, especially in those with higher-complexity tumours. While baseline nonmodifiable patient/tumour-related characteristics modulate this risk, PN should be prioritised over RN to maximise nephron preservation if oncological outcomes are not jeopardised. Patient summary In this study, we evaluated how many patients with a localised renal mass and two functioning kidneys, who were candidates for surgery at four referral European centres, experienced acute kidney injury at hospital discharge and significant renal functional impairment during the follow-up. We found that the risk of acute kidney injury and clinically significant chronic kidney disease in this patient population is not negligible, and was associated with specific baseline patient comorbidities, preoperative renal function, tumour anatomical complexity, and surgery-related factors, in particular the performance of radical nephrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessio Pecoraro
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Eduard Roussel
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Antonio Andrea Grosso
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Maarten Albersen
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sergio Serni
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Bertolo R, Pecoraro A, Carbonara U, Amparore D, Diana P, Muselaers S, Marchioni M, Mir MC, Antonelli A, Badani K, Breda A, Challacombe B, Kaouk J, Mottrie A, Porpiglia F, Porter J, Minervini A, Campi R. Resection Techniques During Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 52:7-21. [PMID: 37182118 PMCID: PMC10172691 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Context The resection technique used to excise tumor during robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) is of paramount importance in achieving optimal clinical outcomes. Objective To provide an overview of the different resection techniques used during RPN, and a pooled analysis of comparative studies. Evidence acquisition The systematic review was conducted according to established principles (PROSPERO: CRD42022371640) on November 7, 2022. A population (P: adult patients undergoing RPN), intervention (I: enucleation), comparator (C: enucleoresection or wedge resection), outcome (O: outcome measurements of interest), and study design (S) framework was prespecified to assess study eligibility. Studies reporting a detailed description of resection techniques and/or evaluating the impact of resection technique on outcomes of surgery were included. Evidence synthesis Resection techniques used during RPN can be broadly classified as resection (non-anatomic) or enucleation (anatomic). A standardized definition for these is lacking. Out of 20 studies retrieved, nine compared "standard" resection versus enucleation. A pooled analysis did not reveal significant differences in terms of operative time, ischemia time, blood loss, transfusions, or positive margins. Significant differences favoring enucleation were found for clamping management (odds ratio [OR] for renal artery clamping 3.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-10.88; p = 0.03), overall complications (OR for occurrence 0.55, 95% CI 0.34-0.87; p = 0.01) major complications (OR for occurrence 0.39, 95% CI 0.19-0.79; p = 0.009), length of stay (weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.72 d, 95% CI -0.99 to -0.45; p < 0.001), and decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (WMD -2.64 ml/min, 95% CI -5.15 to -0.12; p = 0.04). Conclusions There is heterogeneity in the reporting of resection techniques used during RPN. The urological community must improve the quality of reporting and research produced accordingly. Positive margins are not specifically related to the resection technique. Focusing on studies comparing standard resection versus enucleation, advantages with tumor enucleation in terms of avoidance of artery clamping, overall/major complications, length of stay, and renal function were found. These data should be considered when planning the RPN resection strategy. Patient summary We reviewed studies on robotic surgery for partial kidney removal using different techniques to cut away the kidney tumor. We found that a technique called "enucleation" was associated with similar cancer control outcomes in comparison to the standard technique and had fewer complications, better kidney function after surgery, and a shorter hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alessio Pecoraro
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Umberto Carbonara
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation-Urology, Unit of Andrology and Kidney Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Pietro Diana
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Stijn Muselaers
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michele Marchioni
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Laboratory of Biostatistics, G. D’Annunzio Chieti-Pescara University, Chieti, Italy
- Department of Urology, SS Annunziata Hospital, G. D’Annunzio Chieti-Pescara University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Maria Carmen Mir
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Investigación Hospital IMED Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Ketan Badani
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ben Challacombe
- Department of Urology, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jihad Kaouk
- Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Orsi Academy, Melle, Belgium
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Jim Porter
- Swedish Urology Group, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Marchioni M, Amparore D, Pecoraro A, Bertolo R, Campi R. Morbidity and mortality of metastasectomy for renal cell carcinoma: is centralization of care the way forward? Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023; 75:413-416. [PMID: 37221833 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.23.05365-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Marchioni
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Laboratory of Biostatistics, G. D'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- School of Medicine, Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy -
| | - Alessio Pecoraro
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Riccardo Campi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Girometti R, Giannarini G, Peruzzi V, Amparore D, Pizzolitto S, Zuiani C. MRI-informed prostate biopsy: What the radiologist should know on quality in biopsy planning and biopsy acquisition. Eur J Radiol 2023; 164:110852. [PMID: 37167683 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Quality is currently recognized as the pre-requisite for delivering the clinical benefits expected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-informed prostate biopsy (MRI-i-PB) in patients with a suspicion for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). The "quality chain" underlying MRI-i-PB is multidisciplinary in nature, and depends on several factors related to the patient, imaging technique, image interpretation and biopsy procedure. This review aims at making the radiologist aware of biopsy-related factors impacting on MRI-i-PB quality, both in terms of biopsy planning (threshold for biopsy decisions, association with systematic biopsy and number of targeted cores) and biopsy acquisition (biopsy route, targeting technique, and operator's experience). While there is still space for improvement and better standardization of several biopsy-related procedures, current evidence suggests that high-quality MRI-i-PB can be delivered by acquiring and increased the number of biopsy cores targeted to suspicious imaging findings and perilesional area ("focal saturation biopsy"). On the other hand, uncertainty still exists as to whether software-assisted fusion of MRI and transrectal ultrasound images can outperform cognitive fusion strategy. The role for operator's experience and quality assurance/quality control procedures are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rossano Girometti
- Institute of Radiology, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, University Hospital S. Maria della Misericordia, p.le S. Maria della Misericordia n. 15, 33100 Udine, Italy.
| | - Gianluca Giannarini
- Urology Unit, University Hospital Santa Maria della Misericordia, p.le S. Maria della Misericordia n. 15, 33100 Udine, Italy.
| | - Valeria Peruzzi
- Institute of Radiology, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, University Hospital S. Maria della Misericordia, p.le S. Maria della Misericordia n. 15, 33100 Udine, Italy.
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Torino, Italy.
| | - Stefano Pizzolitto
- Unit of Pathology, University Hospital S. Maria della Misericordia, p.le S. Maria della Misericordia n. 15, 33100 Udine, Italy.
| | - Chiara Zuiani
- Institute of Radiology, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, University Hospital S. Maria della Misericordia, p.le S. Maria della Misericordia n. 15, 33100 Udine, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Amparore D, Porpiglia F. Fluorescence in prostate cancer surgery. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:417-419. [PMID: 37142366 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00164-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Della Corte M, Clemente E, Cerchia E, De Cillis S, Checcucci E, Amparore D, Fiori C, Porpiglia F, Gerocarni Nappo S. Intravesical Agents in the Treatment of Bladder Clots in Children. Pediatr Rep 2023; 15:282-292. [PMID: 37092476 PMCID: PMC10123654 DOI: 10.3390/pediatric15020024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Bladder blood clots represent an infrequent urinary condition in children. They usually result from hematuria with many underlying causes, such as urinary tract infections and urethral/bladder traumas. Treatment options for clot removal include trans-urethral or suprapubic bladder irrigation and, if unsuccessful, endoscopic management under general anesthesia with a resectoscope. In younger male children, however, the repeated passage of a trans-urethral resectoscope may be challenging and traumatic, due to the small lumen diameter. Eventually, an open surgical approach can be required in many patients. Few anecdotal non-surgical approaches have been proposed for the management of bladder blood clots in children. This review aims to summarize the conservative techniques described in the literature with the instillation of intravesical agents, analyzing the different strategies and their advantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Della Corte
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043 Orbassano, Italy
- Division of Pediatric Urology, Regina Margherita Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Erica Clemente
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Verdi 8, 10124 Turin, Italy
| | - Elisa Cerchia
- Division of Pediatric Urology, Regina Margherita Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Sabrina De Cillis
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043 Orbassano, Italy
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043 Orbassano, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043 Orbassano, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043 Orbassano, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043 Orbassano, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Martini A, Wever L, Soeterik TFW, Rakauskas A, Fankhauser CD, Grogg JB, Checcucci E, Amparore D, Haiquel L, Rodriguez-Sanchez L, Ploussard G, Qiang P, Affentranger A, Marquis A, Marra G, Ettala O, Zattoni F, Falagario UG, De Angelis M, Kesch C, Apfelbeck M, Al-Hammouri T, Kretschmer A, Kasivisvanathan V, Preisser F, Lefebvre E, Olivier J, Radtke JP, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Carrieri G, Moro FD, Boström P, Jambor I, Gontero P, Chiu PK, John H, Macek P, Porpiglia F, Hermanns T, van den Bergh RCN, van Basten JPA, Gandaglia G, Valerio M. Reply by Authors. J Urol 2023:101097JU000000000000344202. [PMID: 37052482 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000003442.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Martini
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Lieke Wever
- St Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Arnas Rakauskas
- Department of Urology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Josias Bastian Grogg
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Luciano Haiquel
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Peng Qiang
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | | | - Alessandro Marquis
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Otto Ettala
- Department of Urology, Turku University, Turku, Finland
| | - Fabio Zattoni
- Urology Unit, Academical Medical Centre Hospital, Udine, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Mario De Angelis
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Kesch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Tarek Al-Hammouri
- Department of Urology, University College London and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Department of Urology, University College London and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Felix Preisser
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | | | - Jan Philipp Radtke
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Fabrizio Dal Moro
- Urology Unit, Academical Medical Centre Hospital, Udine, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Peter Boström
- Department of Urology, Turku University, Turku, Finland
| | - Ivan Jambor
- Department of Urology, Turku University, Turku, Finland
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Peter K Chiu
- SH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Hubert John
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Petr Macek
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | | | - Thomas Hermanns
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Jean-Paul A van Basten
- St Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Department of Urology, Geneva University Hospital, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Franco A, Amparore D, Porpiglia F, Autorino R. Augmented Reality-guided Robotic Surgery: Drilling Down a Giant Leap into Small Steps. Eur Urol 2023:S0302-2838(23)02699-4. [PMID: 37032185 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.03.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Franco
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|