851
|
Psilopatis I, Pergaris A, Giaginis C, Theocharis S. Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors: A Promising Therapeutic Alternative for Endometrial Carcinoma. DISEASE MARKERS 2021; 2021:7850688. [PMID: 34804263 PMCID: PMC8604582 DOI: 10.1155/2021/7850688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Endometrial carcinoma is the most common malignant tumor of the female genital tract in the United States. Epigenetic alterations are implicated in endometrial cancer development and progression. Histone deacetylase inhibitors are a novel class of anticancer drugs that increase the level of histone acetylation in many cell types, thereby inducing cell cycle arrest, differentiation, and apoptotic cell death. This review is aimed at determining the role of histone acetylation and examining the therapeutic potential of histone deacetylase inhibitors in endometrial cancer. In order to identify relevant studies, a literature review was conducted using the MEDLINE and LIVIVO databases. The search terms histone deacetylase, histone deacetylase inhibitor, and endometrial cancer were employed, and we were able to identify fifty-two studies focused on endometrial carcinoma and published between 2001 and 2021. Deregulation of histone acetylation is involved in the tumorigenesis of both endometrial carcinoma histological types and accounts for high-grade, aggressive carcinomas with worse prognosis and decreased overall survival. Histone deacetylase inhibitors inhibit tumor growth, enhance the transcription of silenced physiologic genes, and induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in endometrial carcinoma cells both in vitro and in vivo. The combination of histone deacetylase inhibitors with traditional chemotherapeutic agents shows synergistic cytotoxic effects in endometrial carcinoma cells. Histone acetylation plays an important role in endometrial carcinoma development and progression. Histone deacetylase inhibitors show potent antitumor effects in various endometrial cancer cell lines as well as tumor xenograft models. Additional clinical trials are however needed to verify the clinical utility and safety of these promising therapeutic agents in the treatment of patients with endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iason Psilopatis
- First Department of Pathology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 75 Mikras Asias Street, Bld 10, Goudi, 11527 Athens, Greece
- Charité-University School of Medicine, Augustenburger Pl. 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexandros Pergaris
- First Department of Pathology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 75 Mikras Asias Street, Bld 10, Goudi, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | | | - Stamatios Theocharis
- First Department of Pathology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 75 Mikras Asias Street, Bld 10, Goudi, 11527 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
852
|
Marnitz S. [Importance of pre-operative immunohistochemistry in patients with endometrial cancer-which parameters do we need?]. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:1148-1150. [PMID: 34762138 PMCID: PMC8604832 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01862-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S Marnitz
- Klinik für Radioonkologie, Cyberknife und Strahlentherapie, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
853
|
Li W, Jiang J, Fu Y, Shen Y, Zhang C, Yao S, Xu C, Xia M, Lou G, Liu J, Lin B, Wang J, Zhao W, Zhang J, Cheng W, Guo H, Guo R, Xue F, Wang X, Han L, Zhao X, Li X, Zhang P, Zhao J, Ma J, Yao Q, Yang X, Dou Y, Wang Z, Liu J, Fang Y, Li K, Wang B, Chen G, Cheng X, Sun C, Kong B. Implications of Isolated Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastasis in Endometrial Cancer: A Large-Scale, Multicenter, and Retrospective Study. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:754890. [PMID: 34746191 PMCID: PMC8566710 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.754890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To systematically evaluate lymph node metastasis (LNM) patterns in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) who underwent complete surgical staging, which included systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Methods: Four thousand and one patients who underwent complete surgical staging including systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for EC were enrolled from 30 centers in China from 2001 to 2019. We systematically displayed the clinical and prognostic characteristics of patients with various LNM patterns, especially the PLN-PAN+ [para-aortic lymph node (PAN) metastasis without pelvic lymph node (PLN) metastasis]. The efficacy of PAN+ (para-aortic lymph node metastasis) prediction with clinical and pathological features was evaluated. Results: Overall, 431 of the 4,001 patients (10.8%) showed definite LNM according to pathological diagnosis. The PAN+ showed the highest frequency (6.6%) among all metastatic sites. One hundred fourteen cases (26.5%) were PLN-PAN+ (PAN metastasis without PLN metastasis), 167 cases (38.7%) showed PLN+PAN-(PLN metastasis without PAN metastasis), and 150 cases (34.8%) showed metastasis to both regions (PLN+PAN+). There was also 1.9% (51/2,660) of low-risk patients who had PLN-PAN+. There are no statistical differences in relapse-free survival (RFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) among PLN+PAN-, PLN-PAN+, and PLN+PAN+. The sensitivity of gross PLNs, gross PANs, and lymphovascular space involvement (LVSI) to predict PAN+ was 53.8 [95% confidence interval (CI): 47.6–59.9], 74.2 95% CI: 65.6–81.4), and 45.8% (95% CI: 38.7–53.2), respectively. Conclusion: Over one-fourth of EC patients with LMN metastases were PLN-PAN+. PLN-PAN+ shares approximate survival outcomes (RFS and DSS) with other LNM patterns. No effective clinical methods were achieved for predicting PAN+. Thus, PLN-PAN+ is a non-negligible LNM pattern that cannot be underestimated in EC, even in low-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenting Li
- Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jie Jiang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Yu Fu
- Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yuanming Shen
- School of Medicine, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chuyao Zhang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shuzhong Yao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Congjian Xu
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Min Xia
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Shandong, China
| | - Ge Lou
- Department of Gynecology Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Jihong Liu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bei Lin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital Affiliated to China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Jianliu Wang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Weidong Zhao
- Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Jieqing Zhang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Guangxi, China
| | - Wenjun Cheng
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Hongyan Guo
- The Third Hospital of Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Ruixia Guo
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Fengxia Xue
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Xipeng Wang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Xin Hua Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Lili Han
- Department of Gynecology, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China
| | - Xia Zhao
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Development and Related Disease of Women and Children Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiaomao Li
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ping Zhang
- Department of Gynecology, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan Shandong, China
| | - Jianguo Zhao
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Affiliated Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Clinical Research Center for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin, China
| | - Jiezhi Ma
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xiangya Third Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Qin Yao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Xiaohang Yang
- Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yingyu Dou
- Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zizhuo Wang
- Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jingbo Liu
- Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yong Fang
- Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Kezhen Li
- Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Beibei Wang
- Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Gang Chen
- Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiaodong Cheng
- School of Medicine, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chaoyang Sun
- Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Beihua Kong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
854
|
Biological Planning of Radiation Dose Based on In Vivo Dosimetry for Postoperative Vaginal-Cuff HDR Interventional Radiotherapy (Brachytherapy). Biomedicines 2021; 9:biomedicines9111629. [PMID: 34829858 PMCID: PMC8615499 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9111629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2021] [Revised: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Postoperative vaginal-cuff HDR interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) is a standard treatment in early-stage endometrial cancer. This study reports the effect of in vivo dosimetry-based biological planning for two different fractionation schedules on the treatment-related toxicities. (2) Methods: 121 patients were treated. Group A (82) received 21 Gy in three fractions. Group B (39) received 20 Gy in four fractions. The dose was prescribed at a 5 mm depth or to the applicator surface according to the distance between the applicator and the rectum. In vivo dosimetry measured the dose of the rectum and/or urinary bladder. With a high measured dose, the dose prescription was changed from a 5 mm depth to the applicator surface. (3) Results: The median age was 66 years with 58.8 months mean follow-up. The dose prescription was changed in 20.7% of group A and in 41% of group B. Most toxicities were grade 1–2. Acute urinary toxicities were significantly higher in group A. The rates of acute and late urinary toxicities were significantly higher with a mean bladder dose/fraction of >2.5 Gy and a total bladder dose of >7.5 Gy. One patient had a vaginal recurrence. (4) Conclusions: Both schedules have excellent local control and acceptable rates of toxicities. Using in vivo dosimetry-based biological planning yielded an acceptable dose to the bladder and rectum.
Collapse
|
855
|
Nakai G, Tanaka Y, Yamada T, Ohmichi M, Yamamoto K, Osuga K. Can addition of frozen section analysis to preoperative endometrial biopsy and MRI improve identification of high-risk endometrial cancer patients? BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1178. [PMID: 34736433 PMCID: PMC8569997 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08910-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Surgeons sometimes have difficulty determining which result to favor when preoperative results (MRI + preoperative endometrial biopsy [pre-op EB]) differ from intraoperative frozen section histology (FS) results. Investigation of how FS can complement ordinary preoperative examinations like MRI and pre-op EB in identification of patients at high risk of lymph node metastasis (high-risk patients) could provide clarity on this issue. Therefore, the aim of this study is to assess the utility of pre-op EB, MRI and FS results and determine how to combine these results in identification of high-risk patients. Methods The subjects were 172 patients with endometrial cancer. Patients with a histological high-grade tumor (HGT), namely, grade 3 endometrioid cancer, clear cell carcinoma or serous cell carcinoma, or with any type of cancer invading at least half of the uterine myometrium were considered high-risk. Tumors invading at least half of the uterine myometrium were classified as high-stage tumors (HST). We compared (a) detection of HGT using pre-op EB versus FS, (b) detection of HST using MRI versus FS, and (c) identification of high-risk patients using MRI + pre-op EB versus FS. Lastly, we determined to what degree addition of FS results improves identification of high-risk patients by routine MRI + pre-op EB. Results (a) Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting HGT were 59.6, 98.4 and 87.8% for pre-op EB versus 55.3, 99.2 and 87.2% for FS (P = 0.44). (b) These figures for detecting HST were 74.4, 83.0 and 80.8% for MRI versus 46.5, 99.2 and 86.0% for FS (P < 0.001). (c) These figures for identifying high-risk patients were 78.3, 85.4 and 82.6% for MRI + pre-op EB versus 55.1, 99.0 and 81.2% for FS (P < 0.001). The high specificity of FS improved the sensitivity of MRI + pre-op EB from 78.3 to 81.2%, but this difference was not statistically significant (P < 0.16). Conclusion Frozen section enables identification of high-risk patients with nearly 100% specificity. This advantage can be used to improve sensitivity for identification of high-risk patients by routine MRI + pre-op EB, although this improvement is not statistically significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Go Nakai
- The department of diagnostic radiology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki City, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan.
| | - Yoshikazu Tanaka
- The department of diagnostic radiology, Tesseikai Neurosurgical Hospital, Shijonawate City, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takashi Yamada
- The department of pathology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki City, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masahide Ohmichi
- The department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki City, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Yamamoto
- The department of diagnostic radiology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki City, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| | - Keigo Osuga
- The department of diagnostic radiology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki City, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
856
|
Tal O, Eitan R, Gemer O, Helpman L, Vaknin Z, Leytes S, Lavie O, Ben-Arie A, Amit A, Namazov A, Ben Shahar I, Atlas I, Bruchim I, Levy T. Prognostic significance of pretreatment thrombocytosis in endometrial cancer: an Israeli Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1437-1442. [PMID: 34725243 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Endometrial cancer prognosis is related to stage, histology, myometrial invasion, and lymphovascular space invasion. Several studies have examined the association between pretreatment thrombocytosis and patient outcomes with contrasting results regarding prognosis. Our aim was to evaluate the association of pretreatment platelet count with outcomes in endometrial cancer patients. METHODS This is an Israeli Gynecologic Oncology Group multicenter retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with endometrial cancer, who underwent surgery between January 2002 and December 2014. Patients were grouped as low risk (endometrioid G1-G2 and villoglandular) and high risk (endometrioid G3, uterine serous papillary carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, and carcinosarcoma). Those with stage I disease were compared with stages II-IV. Disease stages were reviewed and updated to reflect International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 staging. All patients underwent pelvic washings for cytology and total abdominal or laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Pelvic lymph node assessment was performed in patients with tumors of moderate-high risk histology or deep myometrial invasion. Para-aortic sampling was performed at the surgeon's discretion. Patients were categorized by pretreatment platelet count into two groups: ≤400×109/L and >400×109/L (defined as thrombocytosis). Clinical and pathological features were compared using Student t-test, χ2 or Fisher's exact test. Survival measures were plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariable comparison of associations. RESULTS Of the 1482 patients included, most had stage I disease (961; 74.8%) and most had endometrioid histology (927; 64.1%). A total of 1392 patients (94%) had pretreatment platelet counts ≤400×109/L and 90 (6%) had pretreatment thrombocytosis. Patients with thrombocytosis had a significantly higher rate of high-grade malignancy, advanced stage, lymphovascular space invasion, low uterine segment involvement, and lymph node metastases. They also had shorter 5 year disease-free survival (65% vs 80%, p=0.003), disease-specific survival (63% vs 83%, p<0.05) and overall survival (59% vs 77%, p<0.05). On multivariate analysis, an elevated pretreatment thrombocyte count remained a significant independent predictor for disease-specific survival and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS Pretreatment thrombocytosis is an independent prognostic factor for decreased disease-specific survival and overall survival among patients with endometrial cancer, and can serve as a predictor of poor outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ori Tal
- Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel
| | - Ram Eitan
- Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Ofer Gemer
- Barzilai Medical Centre Ashkelon, Ashkelon, Southern, Israel
| | - Limor Helpman
- Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | | | - Ofer Lavie
- Lady Davies Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| | | | | | - Ahmet Namazov
- Barzilai Medical Centre Ashkelon, Ashkelon, Southern, Israel
| | | | | | | | - Tally Levy
- Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
857
|
Orellana TJ, Kim H, Beriwal S, Bhargava R, Berger J, Buckanovich RJ, Coffman LG, Courtney-Brooks M, Mahdi H, Olawaiye AB, Sukumvanich P, Taylor SE, Smith KJ, Lesnock JL. Cost-effectiveness analysis of tumor molecular classification in high-risk early-stage endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 164:129-135. [PMID: 34740462 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.10.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Tumor molecular analyses in endometrial cancer (EC) includes 4 distinct subtypes: (1) POLE-mutated, (2) mismatch repair protein (MMR) deficient, (3) p53 mutant, and (4) no specific molecular profile. Recently, a sub-analysis of PORTEC-3 demonstrated notable differences in treatment response between molecular classification (MC) groups. Cost of testing is one barrier to widespread adoption of MC. Therefore, we sought to determine the cost-effectiveness of MC in patients with stage I and II high-risk EC. METHODS A Markov decision model was developed to compare tumor molecular classification (TMC) vs. no testing (NT). A healthcare payor's perspective and 5-year time horizon were used. Base case data were abstracted from PORTEC-3 and the molecular sub-analysis. Cost and utility data were derived from public databases, peer-reviewed literature, and expert input. Strategies were compared using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) with effectiveness in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and evaluated with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY gained. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test model robustness. RESULTS When compared to NT, TMC was cost effective with an ICER of $25,578 per QALY gained; incremental cost was $1780 and incremental effectiveness was 0.070 QALYs. In one-way sensitivity analyses, results were most sensitive to the cost of POLE testing, but TMC remained cost-effective over all parameter ranges. CONCLUSIONS TMC in early-stage high-risk EC is cost-effective, and the model results were robust over a range of parameters. Given that MC can be used to guide adjuvant treatment decisions, these findings support adoption of TMC into routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T J Orellana
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens' Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 300 Halket Street, Suite 1750, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.
| | - H Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Hillman Cancer Center, 5115 Centre Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, United States
| | - S Beriwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Hillman Cancer Center, 5115 Centre Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, United States
| | - R Bhargava
- Department of Pathology, Magee-Womens' Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 300 Halket Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - J Berger
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens' Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 300 Halket Street, Suite 1750, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - R J Buckanovich
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens' Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 300 Halket Street, Suite 1750, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, United States
| | - L G Coffman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens' Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 300 Halket Street, Suite 1750, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, United States
| | - M Courtney-Brooks
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens' Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 300 Halket Street, Suite 1750, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - H Mahdi
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens' Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 300 Halket Street, Suite 1750, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - A B Olawaiye
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens' Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 300 Halket Street, Suite 1750, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - P Sukumvanich
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens' Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 300 Halket Street, Suite 1750, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - S E Taylor
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens' Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 300 Halket Street, Suite 1750, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - K J Smith
- Center for Research on Health Care, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 200 Meyran Ave., Suite 200, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| | - J L Lesnock
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens' Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 300 Halket Street, Suite 1750, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States
| |
Collapse
|
858
|
Caretto M, Simoncini T. Progestin or anti-estrogen treatment for endometrial cancer: choosing the best option for selected patients. Gynecol Endocrinol 2021; 37:959-960. [PMID: 34698590 DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2021.1995964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Caretto
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pisa, Italy
| | - Tommaso Simoncini
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
859
|
Rabban JT, Garg K, Ladwig NR, Zaloudek CJ, Devine WP. Cytoplasmic Pattern p53 Immunoexpression in Pelvic and Endometrial Carcinomas With TP53 Mutation Involving Nuclear Localization Domains: An Uncommon But Potential Diagnostic Pitfall With Clinical Implications. Am J Surg Pathol 2021; 45:1441-1451. [PMID: 33899789 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000001713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
A cytoplasmic pattern of p53 immunohistochemical expression has recently been reported in a rare subset of pelvic and endometrial cancers with a TP53 mutation involving domains affecting nuclear localization. This study reports the clinicopathologic features of 31 cases with a TP53 mutation involving nuclear localization, the largest study to date, emphasizing practical strategies for recognizing this uncommon variant and distinguishing it from the p53 wild-type pattern. The study also evaluates the prognostic significance of TP53 mutation involving nuclear localization in the ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) cohort of The Cancer Genome Atlas database. Most of the 31 tumors were advanced stage pelvic or endometrial HGSC. All TP53 mutations were predicted to result in loss of function. The p53 overexpression pattern was present in 6 tumors; the p53 null pattern in 3 and the p53 cytoplasmic pattern in 22 tumors. The p53 cytoplasmic pattern predominantly consisted of weak to moderate cytoplasmic staining in >95% of tumor cells as well as variable intensity nuclear staining involving a range of just a few cells to just under 80% of tumor cells. The p53 cytoplasmic pattern was observed in 100% of tumors with TP53 mutation in the nuclear localization domain and in 33% to 44% of tumors with a mutation in the adjacent tetramerization domain or nuclear exclusion sequence (P<0.01). p16 immunoexpression was present in 74% of tumors. In The Cancer Genome Atlas ovarian HGSC cohort, 9% of 471 nonredundant TP53-mutant cases had a nuclear localization domain, tetramerization domain, or nuclear exclusion sequence mutation but there was no significant difference in survival when compared to cases with TP53 mutation outside those domains (P>0.05). p53 cytoplasmic staining merits classification as an aberrant result despite coexisting nuclear staining that in some cases may resemble the p53 wild-type pattern. While positive p16 immunostaining may be of value to confirm diagnostically challenging cases of p53 cytoplasmic staining, a negative result is noninformative and molecular testing for TP53 mutation should be considered, if available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph T Rabban
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
860
|
Casarin J, Bogani G, Multinu F, Mariani A, Abu-Rustum NR, Ghezzi F, Ramirez PT. Paradigm shifts in gynecologic oncology. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1617. [PMID: 34716176 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jvan Casarin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Varese, Italy .,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Giorgio Bogani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Lazio, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Mariani
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Fabio Ghezzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Varese, Italy
| | - Pedro T Ramirez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
861
|
Cabezas Palacios MN, García Pineda V, Gracia Segovia M, Diestro Tejeda MD, Hernández Gutiérrez A, Zapardiel Gutiérrez I. Utility of indocyanine green as a single tracer for sentinel node biopsy in endometrial cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2021; 48:222-229. [PMID: 34698419 DOI: 10.1111/jog.15071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
AIM Our study aims to investigate the safety and effectiveness of sentinel lymph node biopsy using indocyanine green (ICG) for the surgical staging of early-stage endometrial cancer in comparison to technetium-99 m use. METHODS We conducted an observational retrospective study with patients diagnosed of endometrial cancer and FIGO stages I-II. All participants were injected technetium-99m the day prior to the surgery and underwent lymphoscintigraphy along with single-photon emission computed tomography. In addition, all patients were administered intraoperatively ICG injection to detect sentinel lymph node biopsy. The surgical staging was then completed according to the European Society for Medical Oncology preoperative risk category. Data obtained from the analysis of technetium-99m detection was compared to ICG detection. RESULTS A total of 53 women with endometrial cancer were included in the study, 49 (92.5%) of them showed drainage preoperatively in the single-photon emission computed tomography and/or lymphoscintigraphy. The intraoperative bilateral detection rate for technetium-99 m was 26 (49.1%) patients compared to 40 (75.5%) patients with ICG (p = 0.013). We observed a 42.5% increase in the mean number of lymph nodes retrieved by ICG compared to technetium-99m (2.85 vs 2,0 nodes; p = 0.002). We intraoperatively identified 164 lymph nodes, 104 (63.4%) located in both obturator areas and external iliac vessels. CONCLUSION The use of ICG for the performance of sentinel node biopsy in patients with endometrial cancer seems safe and could be superior to technetium-99 m, since it offers a higher bilateral detection rate and nodal retrieval, resulting in the possibility to perform safely less full staging lymphadenectomies.
Collapse
|
862
|
Ditto A, Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Lopez S, Martinelli F, Bogani G, Lo Vullo S, Brusadelli C, Paolini B, Ducceschi M, Mantiero M, Chiappa V, Signorelli M, Evangelista M, Mariani L, Raspagliesi F. Uterine serous carcinoma: role of surgery, risk factors and oncologic outcomes. Experience of a tertiary center. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 48:268-274. [PMID: 34753617 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate factors impacting survival outcomes in patients with uterine serous carcinoma (USC). METHODS Data of consecutive patients diagnosed with USC undergoing surgery between 2000 and 2020 at Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan (Italy) were reviewed. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS Records of 147 consecutive patients meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Stage distribution was: 67 (45.6%) patients with early-stage with uterine confined disease and 80 (54.4%) with advanced stages disease. Minimally invasive surgery was performed in 43 patients (29.5%). The median follow-up period was 78.6 months (IQ range = 35.7-117.3 months). The overall recurrence rate was 41% (60 patients): 19/67 patients (28.4%) with early-stage disease and 41/80 patients (51.3%) with advanced stage. The 5-year PFS rate was 35.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.5-44.7%). In multivariate analysis, age, BMI, depth of myometrial invasion, cytology, and optimal cytoreduction with postoperative residual tumor absent significantly impacted on PFS. The 5-year OS rates were 46.5% (95% CI: 38.1-56.8). The result of multivariate analysis showed that there was significant difference in OS based only on optimal cytoreduction and accuracy of retroperitoneal surgery. CONCLUSIONS In apparent early-stage USC, peritoneal and retroperitoneal staging allows to identify patients with disease harboring outside the uterus. Optimal cytoreduction is the most significant prognostic factor. Further collaborative studies are warranted in order to improve outcomes of USC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonino Ditto
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Salvatore Lopez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Martinelli
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Bogani
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Salvatore Lo Vullo
- Unit of Clinical Epidemiology and Trial Organization, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Brusadelli
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Biagio Paolini
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Monika Ducceschi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Mara Mantiero
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Valentina Chiappa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Mauro Signorelli
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Luigi Mariani
- Unit of Clinical Epidemiology and Trial Organization, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
863
|
Koskas M, Amant F, Mirza MR, Creutzberg CL. Cancer of the corpus uteri: 2021 update. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2021; 155 Suppl 1:45-60. [PMID: 34669196 PMCID: PMC9297903 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 151] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy in high‐ and middle‐income countries. Although the overall prognosis is relatively good, high‐grade endometrial cancers have a tendency to recur. Recurrence needs to be prevented since the prognosis for recurrent endometrial cancer is dismal. Treatment tailored to tumor biology is the optimal strategy to balance treatment efficacy against toxicity. Since The Cancer Genome Atlas defined four molecular subgroups of endometrial cancers, the molecular factors are increasingly used to define prognosis and treatment. Standard treatment consists of hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo‐oophorectomy. Lymphadenectomy (and increasingly sentinel node biopsy) enables identification of lymph node‐positive patients who need adjuvant treatment, including radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Adjuvant therapy is used for Stage I–II patients with high‐risk factors and Stage III patients; chemotherapy is especially used in non‐endometrioid cancers and those in the copy‐number high molecular group characterized by TP53 mutation. In advanced disease, a combination of surgery to no residual disease and chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy results in the best outcome. Surgery for recurrent disease is only advocated in patients with a good performance status with a relatively long disease‐free interval. The latest state‐of‐the‐art treatment for endometrial cancer is described, incorporating the most recent new data that influence its clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Koskas
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Bichat University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mansoor Raza Mirza
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Carien L Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
864
|
Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Khamisy-Farah R, Bragazzi NL, Bogani G, Martinelli F, Lopez S, Chiappa V, Signorelli M, Ditto A, Raspagliesi F. Fertility-Sparing Treatment of Patients with Endometrial Cancer: A Review of the Literature. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10204784. [PMID: 34682906 PMCID: PMC8539778 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10204784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2021] [Revised: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) is currently the most common malignancy of the female genital tract in developed countries. Although it is more common in postmenopausal women, it may affect up to 25% in the premenopausal age and 3–5% under the age of 40 years. Furthermore, in the last decades a significant shift to pregnancy at older maternal ages, particularly in resource-rich countries, has been observed. Therefore, in this scenario fertility-sparing alternatives should be discussed with patients affected by EC. This study summarizes available literature on fertility-sparing management of patients affected by EC, focusing on the oncologic and reproductive outcomes. A systematic computerized search of the literature was performed in two electronic databases (PubMed and MEDLINE) in order to identify relevant articles to be included for the purpose of this systematic review. On the basis of available evidence, fertility-sparing alternatives are oral progestins alone or in combination with other drugs, levonorgestrel intrauterine system and hysteroscopic resection in association with progestin therapies. These strategies seem feasible and safe for young patients with G1 endometrioid EC limited to the endometrium. However, there is a lack of high-quality evidence on the efficacy and safety of fertility-sparing treatments and future well-designed studies are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore
- Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (G.B.); (F.M.); (S.L.); (V.C.); (M.S.); (A.D.); (F.R.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Rola Khamisy-Farah
- Clalit Health Service, Akko, Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed 13100, Israel;
| | - Nicola Luigi Bragazzi
- Laboratory for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (LIAM), Department of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada;
| | - Giorgio Bogani
- Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (G.B.); (F.M.); (S.L.); (V.C.); (M.S.); (A.D.); (F.R.)
| | - Fabio Martinelli
- Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (G.B.); (F.M.); (S.L.); (V.C.); (M.S.); (A.D.); (F.R.)
| | - Salvatore Lopez
- Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (G.B.); (F.M.); (S.L.); (V.C.); (M.S.); (A.D.); (F.R.)
| | - Valentina Chiappa
- Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (G.B.); (F.M.); (S.L.); (V.C.); (M.S.); (A.D.); (F.R.)
| | - Mauro Signorelli
- Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (G.B.); (F.M.); (S.L.); (V.C.); (M.S.); (A.D.); (F.R.)
| | - Antonino Ditto
- Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (G.B.); (F.M.); (S.L.); (V.C.); (M.S.); (A.D.); (F.R.)
| | - Francesco Raspagliesi
- Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (G.B.); (F.M.); (S.L.); (V.C.); (M.S.); (A.D.); (F.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
865
|
Daix M, Gladieff L, Martinez A, Ferron G, Angeles MA. Pocket memo based on the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma: definition of prognostic risk groups. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1615-1616. [PMID: 34645685 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Manon Daix
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, Occitanie, France .,Mont Legia - Department of Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier Chrétien, Liege, Wallonie, Belgium
| | - Laurence Gladieff
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, Occitanie, France
| | - Alejandra Martinez
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, Occitanie, France
| | - Gwenael Ferron
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, Occitanie, France
| | - Martina Aida Angeles
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, Occitanie, France
| |
Collapse
|
866
|
Zaccarini F, Sanson C, Maulard A, Scherier S, Pautier P, Leary A, Genestie C, Chargari C, Morice P, Gouy S. [Surgical de-escalation in gynecologic oncology]. Bull Cancer 2021; 108:1155-1161. [PMID: 34629168 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2021.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
The evolution of knowledge in gynecologic oncology is leading to surgical de-escalation in several areas, particularly in lymph node staging. Sentinel lymph node biopsy that was initially used in low and intermediate risk endometrial cancer, has now been extended to high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer. Sentinel lymph node biopsy plays also an important role in the nodal staging of early-stage cervical cancer. The radicality of hysterectomies in patients with early cervical cancer is under debate. Similarly, surgical staging with para-aortic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer should be performed only for few cases. Systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with advanced ovarian cancers is not recommended anymore.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Zaccarini
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, Gustave-Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France.
| | - Claire Sanson
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, Gustave-Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Amandine Maulard
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, Gustave-Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Stéphanie Scherier
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, Gustave-Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Patricia Pautier
- Service d'oncologie médicale, Gustave-Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Alexandra Leary
- Service d'oncologie médicale, Gustave-Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Catherine Genestie
- Service de pathologie morphologique, Gustave-Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Service de radiothérapie, Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Philippe Morice
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, Gustave-Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Sébastien Gouy
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, Gustave-Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
867
|
Coll-de la Rubia E, Martinez-Garcia E, Dittmar G, Nazarov PV, Bebia V, Cabrera S, Gil-Moreno A, Colás E. In silico Approach for Validating and Unveiling New Applications for Prognostic Biomarkers of Endometrial Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:5052. [PMID: 34680205 PMCID: PMC8534093 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13205052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) mortality is directly associated with the presence of prognostic factors. Current stratification systems are not accurate enough to predict the outcome of patients. Therefore, identifying more accurate prognostic EC biomarkers is crucial. We aimed to validate 255 prognostic biomarkers identified in multiple studies and explore their prognostic application by analyzing them in TCGA and CPTAC datasets. We analyzed the mRNA and proteomic expression data to assess the statistical prognostic performance of the 255 proteins. Significant biomarkers related to overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were combined and signatures generated. A total of 30 biomarkers were associated either to one or more of the following prognostic factors: histological type (n = 15), histological grade (n = 6), FIGO stage (n = 1), molecular classification (n = 16), or they were associated to OS (n = 11), and RFS (n = 5). A prognostic signature composed of 11 proteins increased the accuracy to predict OS (AUC = 0.827). The study validates and identifies new potential applications of 30 proteins as prognostic biomarkers and suggests to further study under-studied biomarkers such as TPX2, and confirms already used biomarkers such as MSH6, MSH2, or L1CAM. These results are expected to advance the quest for biomarkers to accurately assess the risk of EC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Coll-de la Rubia
- Biomedical Research Group in Gynecology, Vall Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, CIBERONC, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (S.C.); (A.G.-M.)
| | - Elena Martinez-Garcia
- Luxembourg Institute of Health, L-1445 Strassen, Luxembourg; (E.M.-G.); (G.D.); (P.V.N.)
| | - Gunnar Dittmar
- Luxembourg Institute of Health, L-1445 Strassen, Luxembourg; (E.M.-G.); (G.D.); (P.V.N.)
| | - Petr V. Nazarov
- Luxembourg Institute of Health, L-1445 Strassen, Luxembourg; (E.M.-G.); (G.D.); (P.V.N.)
| | - Vicente Bebia
- Gynaecological Department, Vall Hebron University Hospital, CIBERONC, 08035 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Silvia Cabrera
- Biomedical Research Group in Gynecology, Vall Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, CIBERONC, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (S.C.); (A.G.-M.)
- Gynaecological Department, Vall Hebron University Hospital, CIBERONC, 08035 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Antonio Gil-Moreno
- Biomedical Research Group in Gynecology, Vall Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, CIBERONC, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (S.C.); (A.G.-M.)
- Gynaecological Department, Vall Hebron University Hospital, CIBERONC, 08035 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Eva Colás
- Biomedical Research Group in Gynecology, Vall Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, CIBERONC, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (S.C.); (A.G.-M.)
| |
Collapse
|
868
|
Li JY, Park HS, Huang GS, Young MR, Ratner E, Santin A, Damast S. Prognostic impact of mismatch repair deficiency in high- and low-intermediate-risk, early-stage endometrial cancer following vaginal brachytherapy. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 163:557-562. [PMID: 34602287 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the impact of mismatch repair (MMR) status on prognosis among patients with high- and low-intermediate-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) treated with vaginal brachytherapy (VBT). MATERIALS/METHODS 198 stage I-II EEC patients with known MMR status treated with adjuvant VBT were identified. Both low-intermediate (LIR) and high-intermediate-risk (HIR) patients were included. Clinical characteristics were compared between patients with proficient and deficient mismatch repair (pMMR and dMMR) using Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier estimates, the log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS Patients with dMMR compared to pMMR were more likely to have grade 2-3 tumors (75% vs. 57%, p = 0.006), lympho-vascular invasion (40% vs. 25%, p = 0.034), and HIR classification (65% vs. 49%, p = 0.011). Three-year RFS was inferior for dMMR compared to pMMR patients (75% vs. 96%, p = 0.001). dMMR patients compared to pMMR had similarly reduced 3-year RFS within the LIR (74% vs. 100%, p = 0.026) and HIR (75% vs. 91%, p = 0.038) subgroups. Three-year OS was not different between dMMR/pMMR patients (98% vs. 97%, p = 0.653) or HIR/LIR patients (97% vs. 97%, p = 0.999). On multivariable Cox regression, dMMR status was a significant prognostic variable for RFS (HR 3.774, CI 1.495-9.526, p = 0.005), though it was not significant for OS. CONCLUSION Following VBT, patients with dMMR have poorer RFS compared to pMMR patients regardless of HIR/LIR risk classification. The prognosis of intermediate-risk EEC patients may lie more on a continuum dependent on molecular features rather than distinct clinicopathologic risk categories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessie Y Li
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | - Henry S Park
- Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Therapeutic Radiology, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | - Gloria S Huang
- Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | - Melissa R Young
- Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Therapeutic Radiology, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | - Elena Ratner
- Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | - Alessandro Santin
- Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | - Shari Damast
- Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Therapeutic Radiology, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
869
|
Foster L, Burling M, Brand A. The utilisation of sentinel lymph node biopsy for endometrial cancer in Australia and New Zealand. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2021; 62:104-109. [PMID: 34605005 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The aim of this study was to identify to what extent the sentinel lymph node (SLN) technique is utilised by gynaecological oncologists in Australia and New Zealand, identifying the techniques used, any barriers to uptake, and management of isolated tumour cells (ITCs) and micrometastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted an online survey of all practising gynaecological oncologists in Australia and New Zealand. They were asked whether they utilised SLN biopsy and in what circumstances, how they managed non-mapping and how their multidisciplinary team managed small volume disease. Those who did not were asked to identify their concerns with the procedure, reasons for non-uptake and their alternate technique. RESULTS We surveyed 63 gynaecological oncologists of whom 59 were practising, and 48 (81%) responded. Six members (11%) do not utilise SLN biopsy, and 42 (89%) do. Areas where clinicians differ in practice are those areas that are most controversial and include the use of SLN biopsy in complex atypical hyperplasia, the management of ITCs and micrometastases and procedures on unilateral or bilateral non-mapping. Those who do not utilise the technique cite concerns about the false-negative rate, equipment and training issues. CONCLUSIONS The utilisation of SLN biopsy in endometrial cancer is well established in Australia and New Zealand, with similar practices and concerns to those of other international groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leon Foster
- Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael Burling
- Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Alison Brand
- Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
870
|
Kang EY, Wiebe NJ, Aubrey C, Lee CH, Anglesio MS, Tilley D, Ghatage P, Nelson GS, Lee S, Köbel M. Selection of endometrial carcinomas for p53 immunohistochemistry based on nuclear features. JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY CLINICAL RESEARCH 2021; 8:19-32. [PMID: 34596362 PMCID: PMC8682942 DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
The World Health Organization endorses molecular subclassification of endometrial endometrioid carcinomas (EECs). Our objectives were to test the sensitivity of tumor morphology in capturing p53 abnormal (p53abn) cases and to model the impact of p53abn on changes to ESGO/ESTRO/ESP (European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology) risk stratification. A total of 292 consecutive endometrial carcinoma resections received at Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Canada (2019–2021) were retrieved and assigned to ESGO risk groups with and without p53 status. Three pathologists reviewed the representative H&E‐stained slides, predicted the p53 status, and indicated whether p53 immunohistochemistry (IHC) would be ordered. Population‐based survival for endometrial carcinomas diagnosed during 2008–2016 in Alberta was obtained from the Alberta Cancer Registry. The cohort consisted mostly of grade 1/2 endometrioid carcinomas (EEC1/2; N = 218, 74.6%). One hundred and fifty‐two EEC1/2 (52.1% overall) were stage IA and 147 (50.3%) were low risk by ESGO. The overall prevalence of p53abn and subclonal p53 was 14.5 and 8.3%, respectively. The average sensitivity of predicting p53abn among observers was 83.6%. Observers requested p53 IHC for 39.4% with 98.5% sensitivity to detect p53abn (99.6% negative predictive value). Nuclear features including smudged chromatin, pleomorphism, atypical mitoses, and tumor giant cells accurately predicted p53abn. In 7/292 (2.4%), p53abn upgraded ESGO risk groups (2 to intermediate risk, 5 to high risk). EEC1/2/stage IA patients had an excellent disease‐specific 5‐year survival of 98.5%. Pathologists can select cases for p53 testing with high sensitivity and low risk of false negativity. Molecular characterization of endometrial carcinomas has great potential to refine ESGO risk classification for a small subset but offers little value for approximately half of endometrial carcinomas, namely, EEC1/2/stage IA cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun Young Kang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Nicholas Jp Wiebe
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Christa Aubrey
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Cheng-Han Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Michael S Anglesio
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Derek Tilley
- Cancer Control, Alberta Health Services, Holy Cross Center, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Prafull Ghatage
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Gregg S Nelson
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Sandra Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
871
|
Sentinel lymph node biopsy in high-grade endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of performance characteristics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 225:367.e1-367.e39. [PMID: 34058168 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A sentinel lymph node biopsy is widely accepted as the standard of care for surgical staging in low-grade endometrial cancer, but its value in high-grade endometrial cancer remains controversial. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the performance characteristics of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with endometrial cancer with high-grade histology (registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews with identifying number CRD42020160280). DATA SOURCES We systematically searched the MEDLINE, Epub Ahead of Print, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Embase databases all through the OvidSP platform. The search was performed between January 1, 2000, and January 26, 2021. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched to identify ongoing registered clinical trials. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We included prospective cohort studies in which sentinel lymph node biopsy were evaluated in clinical stage I patients with high-grade endometrial cancer (grade 3 endometrioid, serous, clear cell, carcinosarcoma, mixed, undifferentiated or dedifferentiated, and high-grade not otherwise specified) with a cervical injection of indocyanine green for sentinel lymph node detection and at least a bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy as a reference standard. If the data were not reported specifically for patients with high-grade histology, the authors were contacted for aggregate data. METHODS We pooled the detection rates and measures of diagnostic accuracy using a generalized linear mixed-effects model with a logit and assessed the risk of bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. RESULTS We identified 16 eligible studies of which the authors for 9 of the studies provided data on 429 patients with high-grade endometrial cancer specifically. The study-level median age was 66 years (range, 44-82.5 years) and the study-level median body mass index was 28.6 kg/m2 (range, 19.4-43.7 kg/m2). The pooled detection rates were 91% per patient (95% confidence interval, 85%-95%; I2=59%) and 64% bilaterally (95% confidence interval, 53%-73%; I2=69%). The overall node positivity rate was 26% (95% confidence interval, 19%-34%; I2=44%). Of the 87 patients with positive node results, a sentinel lymph node biopsy correctly identified 80, yielding a pooled sensitivity of 92% per patient (95% confidence interval, 84%-96%; I2=0%), a false negative rate of 8% (95% confidence interval, 4%-16%; I2=0%), and a negative predictive value of 97% (95% confidence interval, 95%-99%; I2=0%). CONCLUSION Sentinel lymph node biopsy accurately detect lymph node metastases in patients with high-grade endometrial cancer with a false negative rate comparable with that observed in low-grade endometrial cancer, melanoma, vulvar cancer, and breast cancer. These findings suggest that sentinel lymph node biopsy can replace complete lymphadenectomies as the standard of care for surgical staging in patients with high-grade endometrial cancer.
Collapse
|
872
|
Ouasti S, Bucau M, Larouzee E, Clement De Givry S, Chabbert-Buffet N, Koskas M. Prospective study of fertility-sparing treatment with chlormadinone acetate for endometrial carcinoma and atypical hyperplasia in young women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2021; 157:452-457. [PMID: 34558063 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Revised: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To confirm that the efficiency of the use of chlormadinone acetate for 6 months to obtain remission of atypical hyperplasia or endometrial carcinoma is comparable to that of the use of other fertility-sparing treatments. METHOD The present study is based on the PREFERE prospective registry. All the patients received 3 or 6 months of chlormadinone acetate and were evaluated by hysteroscopic resection and pipelle sampling every 3 months. RESULTS Ninety-four patients were included. Seventy-nine patients achieved complete remission at 6 months (84%). No patients stopped treatment because of a lack of tolerance. Twenty-four per cent of the patients achieved a live birth. CONCLUSION Chlormadinone acetate is an effective and well-tolerated fertility-sparing treatment. Its benefits over other progestins are its tolerability, and its absence of contraindications, which make it a good choice for patients with thromboembolism and high vascular risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samia Ouasti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Surgery, Hôpital Bichat Claude Bernard, Paris, France
| | - Margot Bucau
- Department of Anatomopathology, Hôpital Bichat Claude Bernard, Paris, France
| | - Elise Larouzee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Surgery, Hôpital Bichat Claude Bernard, Paris, France
| | | | - Nathalie Chabbert-Buffet
- Department Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, APHP Sorbonne University Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - Martin Koskas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Surgery, Hôpital Bichat Claude Bernard, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
873
|
|
874
|
Van NT, Nguyen-Xuan HT, Koual M, Bentivegna E, Bats AS, Azaïs H. [Sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of early-stage ovarian cancer: A systematic review of the literature]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 50:75-81. [PMID: 34562642 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2021.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
The initial management of early-stage ovarian cancer consists of staging surgery including pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. The use of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure in this setting may decrease the morbidity associated with this surgery. The objective of this review was to evaluate the feasibility of the SLN procedure in ovarian cancer diagnosed at an early stage by comparing the different techniques used and their accuracy. A systematic literature search was performed on PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov for articles in English or French about the SLN technique in ovarian cancer. Ten studies were included in the analysis, with a total of 179 patients. The main tracers used were Technetium-99m, indocyanine green, and patent blue, and the most common site of injection was the proper ovarian and unfundibulopelvic ligaments. The overall detection rate was 87.7%. Of the small number of cases of lymph node metastasis reported, the SLN procedure had a sensitivity of 90.9% and a negative predictive value of 98.8%. The sentinel node procedure appears to be feasible and safe and could be reliable in determining the lymph node status of patients with early-stage ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N-T Van
- Service de chirurgie cancérologique gynécologique et du Sein, AP-HP, Centre, hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - H-T Nguyen-Xuan
- Service de chirurgie cancérologique gynécologique et du Sein, AP-HP, Centre, hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - M Koual
- Service de chirurgie cancérologique gynécologique et du Sein, AP-HP, Centre, hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France; UFR de médecine, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - E Bentivegna
- Service de chirurgie cancérologique gynécologique et du Sein, AP-HP, Centre, hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - A-S Bats
- Service de chirurgie cancérologique gynécologique et du Sein, AP-HP, Centre, hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France; UFR de médecine, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - H Azaïs
- Service de chirurgie cancérologique gynécologique et du Sein, AP-HP, Centre, hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
875
|
Nero C, Ciccarone F, Pietragalla A, Duranti S, Daniele G, Scambia G, Lorusso D. Adjuvant Treatment Recommendations in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: What Changes With the Introduction of The Integrated Molecular-Based Risk Assessment. Front Oncol 2021; 11:612450. [PMID: 34540651 PMCID: PMC8442623 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.612450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Adjuvant therapy recommendations for endometrial cancer were historically based on the individual patient's risk of disease recurrence using clinicopathologic factors such as age, stage, histologic subtype, tumor grade, and lymphovascular space invasion. Despite the excellent prognosis for early stages, considerable under- and overtreatment remains. Integrated genomic characterization by the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) in 2013 defined four distinct endometrial cancer subgroups (POLE mutated, microsatellite instability, low copy number, and high copy number) with possible prognostic value. The validation of surrogate markers (p53, Mismatch repair deficiency, and POLE) to determine these subgroups and the addition of other molecular prognosticators (CTNNB1, L1CAM) resulted in a practical and clinically useful molecular classification tool. The incorporation of such molecular alterations into established clinicopathologic risk factors resulted in a refined, improved risk assessment. Thus, the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP consensus in 2020 defined for the first time different prognostic risk groups integrating molecular markers. Finally, the feasibility and clinical utility of molecular profiling for tailoring adjuvant therapy in the high-intermediate-risk group is currently under investigation (NCT03469674).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Nero
- Direzione Scientifica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Dipartimento di Scienze della vita e sanità pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Ciccarone
- Direzione Scientifica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonella Pietragalla
- Direzione Scientifica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Simona Duranti
- Direzione Scientifica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gennaro Daniele
- Direzione Scientifica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Direzione Scientifica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Dipartimento di Scienze della vita e sanità pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Direzione Scientifica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Dipartimento di Scienze della vita e sanità pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
876
|
Travaglino A, Raffone A, Raimondo D, Arciuolo D, Angelico G, Valente M, Scaglione G, D'alessandris N, Casadio P, Inzani F, Mollo A, Santoro A, Seracchioli R, Franco Zannoni G. Prognostic value of the TCGA molecular classification in uterine carcinosarcoma. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2021; 158:13-20. [PMID: 34536971 PMCID: PMC9292561 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Background The TCGA molecular groups of endometrial carcinoma are “POLE‐mutated” (POLEmut), “microsatellite‐instable/mismatch repair‐deficient” (MSI/MMRd), “TP53‐mutated/p53‐abnormal” (TP53mut/p53abn), and “no specific molecular profile” (NSMP). Objective Prognostic assessment of the TCGA groups in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). Search strategy Systematic review from January 2000 to January 2021. Selection criteria Studies assessing the TCGA groups in UCS. Data collection and analysis Progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan–Meier and Cox analyses (reference: TP53mut/p53abn group) and compared with endometrioid and serous carcinomas (original TCGA cohort), with a significant P < 0.050. Main results Five studies with 263 UCS were included. Compared with TP53mut/p53abn UCS, MSI/MMRd UCS showed significantly better PFS (P < 0.001) but similar OS (P = 0.788), whereas NSMP UCS showed similar PFS (P = 0.936) and OS (P = 0.240). Compared with their endometrioid/serous counterparts, NSMP and TP53mut/p53abn UCS showed significantly worse PFS (P < 0.001 and P = 0.004) and OS (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001), while MSI/MMRd UCS showed similar PFS (P = 0.595) but significantly worse OS (P < 0.001). The POLEmut group showed neither recurrences nor deaths in both the UCS and the endometrioid/serous carcinoma cohorts. Conclusion POLEmut UCS show excellent prognosis, whereas TP53mut/p53abn and NSMP UCS show a prognosis even worse than that of TP53mut/p53abn endometrioid/serous carcinomas. The prognosis of MSI/MMRd UCS remains to be defined. POLEmut UCS show the same excellent prognosis as POLEmut endometrioid carcinomas, while TP53mut/p53abn and NSMP UCS show a prognosis even worse than TP53mut/p53abn endometrioid/serous carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Travaglino
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman's Health Science, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic, Rome, Italy.,Pathology Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Raffone
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.,Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Univeristaria di Bologna, S Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Diego Raimondo
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Univeristaria di Bologna, S Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Damiano Arciuolo
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman's Health Science, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Angelico
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman's Health Science, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Valente
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman's Health Science, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Scaglione
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman's Health Science, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicoletta D'alessandris
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman's Health Science, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Casadio
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Univeristaria di Bologna, S Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Frediano Inzani
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman's Health Science, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Mollo
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Schola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Baronissi, Italy
| | - Angela Santoro
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman's Health Science, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic, Rome, Italy
| | - Renato Seracchioli
- Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Univeristaria di Bologna, S Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gian Franco Zannoni
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman's Health Science, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic, Rome, Italy.,Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
877
|
Pre-treatment risk assessment of women with endometrial cancer: differences in outcomes of molecular and clinical classifications in the Slovenian patient cohort. Radiol Oncol 2021; 56:76-82. [PMID: 34529911 PMCID: PMC8884849 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2021-0036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in prognostic risk profiles of women with endometrial cancer by comparing the clinical risk assessment with the integrated molecular risk assessment profiling. Patients and methods This prospective study recruited patients with biopsy proven endometrial cancer treated at the University Medical Centre Maribor between January 2020 to February 2021. Patient clinical data was assessed and categorized according to the currently valid European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, European SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology, and European Society of Pathology (ESGO/ESTRO/ESP) guidelines on endometrial cancer. Molecular tumour characterization included determination of exonuclease domain of DNA polymerase-epsilon (POLE) mutational status by Sanger sequencing and imunohistochemical specimen evaluation on the presence of mismatch repair deficiencies (MMRd) and p53 abnormalities (p53abn). Results Fourty-five women were included in the study. Twenty-two tumours were of non-specific mutational profile (NSMP) (56.4%), 13 were classified as MMRd (33.3%), 3 were classified as p53abn (7.7%) and 1 was classified as POLE mutated (2.6%). Six tumours (15.4%) had multiple molecular classifiers, these were studied separately and were not included in the risk assessment. The clinical risk-assessment classified 21 women (53.8%) as low-risk, 5 women (12.8%) as intermediate risk, 2 women as high-intermediate risk (5.1%), 10 women (25.6%) as high risk and 1 patient as advanced metastatic (2.6%). The integrated molecular classification changed risk for 4 women (10.3%). Conclusions Integrated molecular risk improves personalized risk assessment in endometrial cancer and could potentially improve therapeutic precision. Further molecular stratification with biomarkers is especially needed in the NSMP group to improve personalized risk-assessment.
Collapse
|
878
|
Ngu SF, Ngan HY, Chan KK. Role of adjuvant and post-surgical treatment in gynaecological cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2021; 78:2-13. [PMID: 34598899 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Adjuvant and post-operative therapy aimed at reducing the risk of disease recurrence and improving potential for cure can be broadly categorised into systemic and locoregional treatment. For epithelial ovarian cancer, cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy is the mainstay management. Maintenance therapy with PARPi is a state-of-the-art option for women with advanced disease following complete or partial response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, particularly those with BRCA mutations. Adjuvant treatment for endometrial cancer depends mostly on FIGO staging and histopathological risk factors. For cervical cancer, adjuvant chemoradiation is indicated after surgery in women with close or positive resection margins and positive nodes. Generally, recommendations for adjuvant therapy should be individualised and reviewed at the multidisciplinary tumour board meeting, and the decision for adjuvant therapy should be balanced with treatment toxicity. The overview of the role of adjuvant and post-surgical treatment in gynaecological cancers will be discussed in this chapter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siew-Fei Ngu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.
| | - Hextan Ys Ngan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Karen Kl Chan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
879
|
Dallaire Nantel L, Renaud MC, Gregoire J, Sebastianelli A, Plante M. High-grade endometrial carcinoma limited to the endometrium or a polyp: is adjuvant treatment necessary? Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1335-1340. [PMID: 34518241 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE High-grade endometrial carcinoma limited to the endometrium or a polyp is a rare clinical entity. Currently there is no consensus on standard treatment. Thus, the goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with type II endometrial carcinoma without myometrial infiltration or limited to a polyp. METHODS We retrospectively identified type II endometrial carcinoma (FIGO endometrioid grade 3, serous, clear cell, mixed and carcinosarcoma) with spread limited to the endometrium or a polyp from April 2013 to November 2017. Medical records were reviewed for the following information: age at diagnosis, patient characteristics, type of surgery, histology, stage according to FIGO 2009 classification, adjuvant treatments, and site of recurrence. Descriptive statistics and the Kaplan-Meier estimate were used for analysis. RESULTS A total of 25 patients with a type II stage IA adenocarcinoma were included. All were surgically staged with total hysterectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy, and lymph nodes assessment. The median age at diagnosis was 69 years. All patients had either disease limited to the endometrium (60%) or a polyp (40%). Only four patients had lymphovascular space invasion (16%). The median follow-up was 44 (range 2-67) months. Six patients (24%) received vault brachytherapy only and all others received no adjuvant treatment after surgery (n=19, 76%). Three patients (12%) experienced recurrences at 15, 21, and 55 months after surgery. Following systemic treatment all are alive and disease-free. The 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 91% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION Expectant management with surveillance alone following surgery appears to be safe for patients with high-grade endometrial carcinoma limited to a polyp or the endometrium without myometrial invasion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jean Gregoire
- Gynecology Oncology, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Marie Plante
- Gynecology Oncology, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
880
|
Diestro MD, Berjón A, Zapardiel I, Yébenes L, Ruiz I, Lekuona A, Rezola M, Jaunarena I, Siegrist J, Sánchez-Pastor M, Cuadra M, Sagasta A, Guerra I, Lete LI, Roldán F, Marta CB, Boillos MJ, Cardiel MJ, López-de la Manzanara C, Relea F, Coronado PJ, Pascual A, Román MJ, Peiró G, Matute LJ, Montero B, Muruzábal JC, Guarch R, Zorrero C, Calatrava A, Ribot L, Costa I, Hernández A, Hardisson D. One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) of Sentinel Lymph Node in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: Spanish Multicenter Study (ENDO-OSNA). Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4465. [PMID: 34503275 PMCID: PMC8431061 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13174465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) for the detection of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis compared to standard pathological ultrastaging in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer (EC). A total of 526 SLNs from 191 patients with EC were included in the study, and 379 SLNs (147 patients) were evaluated by both methods, OSNA and standard pathological ultrastaging. The central 1 mm portion of each lymph node was subjected to semi-serial sectioning at 200 μm intervals and examined by hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemistry with CK19; the remaining tissue was analyzed by OSNA for CK19 mRNA. The OSNA assay detected metastases in 19.7% of patients (14.9% micrometastasis and 4.8% macrometastasis), whereas pathological ultrastaging detected metastasis in 8.8% of patients (3.4% micrometastasis and 5.4% macrometastasis). Using the established cut-off value for detecting SLN metastasis by OSNA in EC (250 copies/μL), the sensitivity of the OSNA assay was 92%, specificity was 82%, diagnostic accuracy was 83%, and the negative predictive value was 99%. Discordant results between both methods were recorded in 20 patients (13.6%). OSNA resulted in an upstaging in 12 patients (8.2%). OSNA could aid in the identification of patients requiring adjuvant treatment at the time of diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Dolores Diestro
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (I.Z.); (J.S.); (M.S.-P.); (A.H.)
| | - Alberto Berjón
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Molecular Pathology and Therapeutic Targets Group, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Center for Biomedical Research in the Cancer Network (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (A.B.); (L.Y.)
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (I.Z.); (J.S.); (M.S.-P.); (A.H.)
| | - Laura Yébenes
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Molecular Pathology and Therapeutic Targets Group, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Center for Biomedical Research in the Cancer Network (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (A.B.); (L.Y.)
| | - Irune Ruiz
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Donostia Osakidetza, 20014 Donostia, Spain; (I.R.); (M.R.)
| | - Arantza Lekuona
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Donostia Osakidetza, 20014 Donostia, Spain; (A.L.); (I.J.)
| | - Marta Rezola
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Donostia Osakidetza, 20014 Donostia, Spain; (I.R.); (M.R.)
| | - Ibon Jaunarena
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Donostia Osakidetza, 20014 Donostia, Spain; (A.L.); (I.J.)
| | - Jaime Siegrist
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (I.Z.); (J.S.); (M.S.-P.); (A.H.)
| | - Margarita Sánchez-Pastor
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (I.Z.); (J.S.); (M.S.-P.); (A.H.)
| | - María Cuadra
- Department of Gynecology, Instituto de Investigación Bioaraba, OSI Araba Hospital Universitario, 01009 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain; (M.C.); (L.I.L.)
| | - Amaia Sagasta
- Department of Pathology, Instituto de Investigación Bioaraba, OSI Araba Hospital Universitario, 01009 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain; (A.S.); (I.G.)
| | - Isabel Guerra
- Department of Pathology, Instituto de Investigación Bioaraba, OSI Araba Hospital Universitario, 01009 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain; (A.S.); (I.G.)
| | - Luis I. Lete
- Department of Gynecology, Instituto de Investigación Bioaraba, OSI Araba Hospital Universitario, 01009 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain; (M.C.); (L.I.L.)
| | - Fernando Roldán
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain; (F.R.); (M.J.B.)
| | - Carlo B. Marta
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain; (C.B.M.); (M.J.C.)
| | - María J. Boillos
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain; (F.R.); (M.J.B.)
| | - María J. Cardiel
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain; (C.B.M.); (M.J.C.)
| | - Carlos López-de la Manzanara
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital General Universitario Ciudad Real, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain;
| | - Fernanda Relea
- Department of Pathology, Hospital General Universitario Ciudad Real, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain;
| | - Pluvio J. Coronado
- Women Health Institute, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, IdISSC, Complutense University, 28040 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Alejandro Pascual
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain;
| | - María J. Román
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital General Universitario Alicante and Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), 03010 Alicante, Spain;
| | - Gloria Peiró
- Department of Pathology, Hospital General Universitario Alicante and Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), 03010 Alicante, Spain;
| | - Luis J. Matute
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Beatriz Montero
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Juan C. Muruzábal
- Department of Gynecology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain;
| | - Rosa Guarch
- Department of Pathology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain;
| | - Cristina Zorrero
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Fundación IVO, 46009 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Ana Calatrava
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Fundación IVO, 46009 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Laia Ribot
- Department of Gynecology, Corporación Sanitaria Parc Taulí Sabadell, 08208 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Irmgard Costa
- Department of Pathology, Corporación Sanitaria Parc Taulí Sabadell, 08208 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Alicia Hernández
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (I.Z.); (J.S.); (M.S.-P.); (A.H.)
| | - David Hardisson
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Molecular Pathology and Therapeutic Targets Group, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Center for Biomedical Research in the Cancer Network (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (A.B.); (L.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
881
|
Giustozzi A, Salutari V, Giudice E, Musacchio L, Ricci C, Landolfo C, Perri MT, Scambia G, Lorusso D. Refining Adjuvant Therapy for Endometrial Cancer: New Standards and Perspectives. BIOLOGY 2021; 10:biology10090845. [PMID: 34571723 PMCID: PMC8470828 DOI: 10.3390/biology10090845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Endometrial carcinoma is the most frequent cancer of the reproductive female organs. Most endometrial cancers are diagnosed at early stage (75%). Treatment options depend on pathogenetic, histopathologic and clinical characteristic at the diagnosis. To improve patient management in the near future, recent research has focused on new molecular features; evidence has shown that these give a better definition of patient prognosis and can help in tailoring adjuvant treatments by identifying specific subgroups of patients whose tumors may benefit from specific therapeutic approaches. In this review, we will focus on current knowledge of adjuvant treatment of endometrial carcinoma, using a prognostic-risk group stratification based on pathogenetic, clinical and molecular features, and will take a look at the ongoing trials that will further change the therapeutic approach in coming years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Giustozzi
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.G.); (E.G.); (M.T.P.); (G.S.)
| | - Vanda Salutari
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; (V.S.); (L.M.); (C.R.); (C.L.)
| | - Elena Giudice
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.G.); (E.G.); (M.T.P.); (G.S.)
| | - Lucia Musacchio
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; (V.S.); (L.M.); (C.R.); (C.L.)
| | - Caterina Ricci
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; (V.S.); (L.M.); (C.R.); (C.L.)
| | - Chiara Landolfo
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; (V.S.); (L.M.); (C.R.); (C.L.)
| | - Maria Teresa Perri
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.G.); (E.G.); (M.T.P.); (G.S.)
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.G.); (E.G.); (M.T.P.); (G.S.)
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; (V.S.); (L.M.); (C.R.); (C.L.)
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.G.); (E.G.); (M.T.P.); (G.S.)
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy; (V.S.); (L.M.); (C.R.); (C.L.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-06-30157337
| |
Collapse
|
882
|
D'Alessandris N, Travaglino A, Santoro A, Arciuolo D, Scaglione G, Raffone A, Inzani F, Zannoni GF. TCGA molecular subgroups of endometrial carcinoma in ovarian endometrioid carcinoma: A quantitative systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 163:427-432. [PMID: 34446267 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (OEC) shares morphological and molecular features with endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC). Several studies assessed the four TCGA groups of EEC, i.e. POLE-mutated (POLEmut), mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd), no specific molecular profile (NSMP) and p53-abnormal (p53abn), in OEC; however, it is unclear whether the TCGA groups have the same distribution and clinicopathological features between OEC and EEC. OBJECTIVE To assess the distribution and clinicopathological features of the TCGA groups in OEC. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out by searching 7 electronic databases from January 2013 to April 2021 for studies assessing the TCGA classification in OEC. Prevalence of each TCGA group in OEC and of FIGO grade 3 and stage>I was pooled using a random-effect model. Prevalence of TCGA groups was compared between OEC and EEC, extracting EEC data from a previous meta-analysis. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression survival analyses were performed for progression-free survival (PFS). A significant p-value<0.05 was adopted. RESULTS Four studies with 785 patients were included. The frequency of the TCGA groups in OEC vs EEC was: POLEmut = 5% vs 7.6% (p = 0.594); MMRd = 14.6% vs 29.2% (p < 0.001); p53abn = 14% vs 7.8% (p = 0.097); NSMP = 66.4% vs 55.4% (p = 0.002). The pooled prevalence of FIGO grade 3 was: POLEmut = 19.2%; MMRd = 18.3%; p53abn = 38.1%; NSMP = 14.5%. The pooled prevalence of FIGO stage >I was: POLEmut = 31.6%; MMRd = 42.8%; p53abn = 48.5%; NSMP = 24.6%. Two-, 5- and 10-year PFS was: POLEmut = 100%, 100%, and 100%; MMRd = 89.1%, 82.2% and 73.3%; p53abn = 61.7%, 50.2% and 39.6%; NSMP = 87.7%, 79.6% and 65.5%. The hazard ratio for disease progression (reference = NSMP) was: POLEmut = not estimable (no events); MMRd = 0.825 (p = 0.626); p53abn = 2.786 (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION The prognostic value of the TCGA groups was similar between OEC and EEC, despite the differences in the frequency and pathological features of each group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicoletta D'Alessandris
- Unità di Ginecopatologia e Patologia Mammaria, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bam-bino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Antonio Travaglino
- Unità di Ginecopatologia e Patologia Mammaria, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bam-bino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy; Anatomic Pathology Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Angela Santoro
- Unità di Ginecopatologia e Patologia Mammaria, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bam-bino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Damiano Arciuolo
- Unità di Ginecopatologia e Patologia Mammaria, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bam-bino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Giulia Scaglione
- Unità di Ginecopatologia e Patologia Mammaria, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bam-bino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Antonio Raffone
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Frediano Inzani
- Unità di Ginecopatologia e Patologia Mammaria, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bam-bino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Gian Franco Zannoni
- Unità di Ginecopatologia e Patologia Mammaria, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bam-bino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy; Istituto di Anatomia Patologica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
883
|
Bizzarri N, Rosati A, Scambia G, Fanfani F. ASO Author Reflections: Minimally Invasive Surgical Staging in Endometrial Cancer Diagnosed After Supracervical Hysterectomy - The Role of Cervical Injection to Detect Sentinel Lymph Node with Indocyanine Green. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:684-685. [PMID: 34426886 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10694-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Bizzarri
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
| | - Andrea Rosati
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Fanfani
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
884
|
Reyes-Baez FE, Garzon S, Mariani A. Lumping and splitting: The need for precision medicine and "personomics" in endometrial cancer. J Gynecol Oncol 2021; 32:e38. [PMID: 33650339 PMCID: PMC7930456 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Simone Garzon
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Andrea Mariani
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
885
|
Visser NCM, van der Wurff AAM, IntHout J, Reijnen C, Dabir PD, Soltani GG, Alcala LSM, Boll D, Bronkhorst CM, Bult P, Geomini PMAJ, van Hamont D, van Herk HADM, de Kievit IM, Ngo H, Pijlman BM, Snijders MPML, Vos MC, Nagtegaal ID, Massuger LFAG, Pijnenborg JMA, Bulten J. Improving preoperative diagnosis in endometrial cancer using systematic morphological assessment and a small immunohistochemical panel. Hum Pathol 2021; 117:68-78. [PMID: 34418427 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2021.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2021] [Revised: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Preoperative histopathological classification determines the primary surgical approach in endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients but has only moderate agreement between preoperative and postoperative diagnosis. The aim of the PIpelle Prospective ENDOmetrial carcinoma (PIPENDO) study is to determine whether histopathological assessment and a small panel of diagnostic biomarkers decreases discrepancies between preoperative and postoperative diagnosis in EC. Preoperative endometrial tissue of 378 included patients with EC was stained with 15 different antibodies. Clinically relevant discrepancies in grade or histological subtype between original preoperative and reviewed postoperative diagnosis were observed in 75 (20%) patients. Highest clinically relevant discrepancy was found in grade 2 ECs (20%), compared to 5% and 14% in respectively grade 1 and 3 endometrioid endometrial carcinomas (EECs). A practical two-biomarker panel with PR and p53 improved diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.92; 95%CI = 0.88-0.95) compared to solely morphological evaluation (AUC = 0.86). In preoperative high-grade EC, the diagnostic accuracy of histological subtype was improved by a three-immunohistochemical biomarker panel (PR, IMP3, and L1CAM) (AUC = 0.93; 95%CI = 0.88-0.98) compared to solely morphological evaluation (AUC = 0.81). In conclusion to improve correct preoperative diagnosis in EC, we recommend use of a panel of at least two easily accessible immunohistochemical biomarkers (PR and p53), only in grade 2 ECs. Overall, this will reduce clinically relevant discrepancies in tumor grade and subtype with postoperative diagnosis with 6% (from 20% to 14%). Addition of PR, IMP3, and L1CAM for histological subtyping in high-grade EECs resulted in a further decrease in discrepancies with 8% (from 20% to 12%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole C M Visser
- Dept. Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Dept. Pathology, Stichting PAMM, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Joanna IntHout
- Dept. for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Casper Reijnen
- Dept. Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Dept. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, 6500 GS, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Parag D Dabir
- Dept. Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Dept. Pathology, Regional Hospital, 8930, Randers, Denmark
| | - Gilda G Soltani
- Dept. Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Luthy S M Alcala
- Dept. Pathology, Amphia Hospital, 4800 RL, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Dorry Boll
- Dept. Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Peter Bult
- Dept. Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Peggy M A J Geomini
- Dept. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maxima Medical Centre, 5504 DB, Veldhoven and Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Dennis van Hamont
- Dept. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amphia Hospital, 4800 RL, Breda, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ineke M de Kievit
- Dept. Pathology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, 6500 GS, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Huy Ngo
- Dept. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Elkerliek Hospital, 5700AB, Helmond, the Netherlands
| | - Brenda M Pijlman
- Dept. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 5200 ME, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Marc P M L Snijders
- Dept. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, 6500 GS, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - M Caroline Vos
- Dept. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, 5000 LC, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Dept. Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Leon F A G Massuger
- Dept. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna M A Pijnenborg
- Dept. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Johan Bulten
- Dept. Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
886
|
Slaager C, Hofhuis W, Hoogduin K, Ewing-Graham P, van Beekhuizen H. Serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (SEIC): Current clinical practice in The Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021; 265:25-29. [PMID: 34416579 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (SEIC) is a rare diagnosis, defined as an intraepithelial lesion with cells identical to serous type endometrial carcinoma. SEIC is considered to be potentially metastatic, however clear and robust data on prognosis are lacking, potentially leading to variability in clinical management. OBJECTIVE The aim is to establish the opinion of gynecologists on the optimal management of patients with SEIC. METHODS An online questionnaire with 15 multiple choice questions was sent to all gynecologists with expertise in gynecological oncology in 19 expert centers in The Netherlands. RESULTS A total of 24 gynecologists participated. The majority of respondents (n = 18/24, 75%) do not consult a guideline regarding the treatment of SEIC. In current practice, 14 of the 24 respondents perform surgical staging in women with SEIC (58.3%) while seven choose hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (29.2%), and three (12.5%) have no firm preference. Eleven of the 14 respondents who perform a surgical staging procedure believe that this is certainly the optimal treatment. The majority of respondents have no firm opinion on whether lymph node sampling or lymph node dissection is preferable during surgical staging (n = 15/23, 65.2%). Most respondents do not give adjuvant therapy (n = 15/24, 62.5%), 25.0% recommend brachytherapy (n = 6/24). Follow-up is for 5 years in almost all cases (n = 23/24). CONCLUSION There is no consensus on the optimal surgical treatment and the use of adjuvant therapy for patients with SEIC. Our research team is therefore conducting a nationwide cohort study in which treatment modality, morbidity and survival will be evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ciska Slaager
- Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Kleiweg 400, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Ward Hofhuis
- Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Kleiweg 400, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Patricia Ewing-Graham
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Pathology. Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Heleen van Beekhuizen
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Gynecological Oncology. Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
887
|
Jamieson A, Bosse T, McAlpine JN. The emerging role of molecular pathology in directing the systemic treatment of endometrial cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2021; 13:17588359211035959. [PMID: 34408794 PMCID: PMC8366203 DOI: 10.1177/17588359211035959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Following the discovery of the four molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer (EC) by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) in 2013, subsequent studies used surrogate markers to develop and validate a clinically relevant EC classification tool to recapitulate TCGA subtypes. Molecular classification combines focused sequencing (POLE) and immunohistochemistry (mismatch repair and p53 proteins) to assign patients with EC to one of four molecular subtypes: POLEmut, MMRd, p53abn and NSMP (no specific molecular profile). Unlike histopathological evaluation, the molecular subtyping of EC offers an objective and reproducible classification system that has been shown to have prognostic value and therapeutic implications. It is an exciting time in EC care where we have moved beyond treatment based on histomorphology alone, and molecular classification will now finally allow assessment of treatment efficacy within biologically similar tumours. It is now recommended that molecular classification should be considered for all ECs, and should be performed routinely in all high grade tumours. It is also recommended to incorporate molecular classification into standard pathology reporting and treatment decision-making algorithms. In this review, we will discuss how the molecular classification of EC can be used to guide both conventional and targeted therapy in this new molecular era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Jamieson
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jessica N McAlpine
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel St, Vancouver, BC V6L-1Z5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
888
|
Substantial Lymphovascular Space Invasion Is an Adverse Prognostic Factor in High-risk Endometrial Cancer. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2021; 41:227-234. [PMID: 34392268 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Approximately 15% of patients with endometrial cancer present with high-risk disease (HREC). Moreover, assessing the extent of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) may provide prognostic insight among patients with HREC. The aim of this study was to determine whether the extent of LVSI can serve as a prognostic factor in HREC. All cases of ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO 2016 classified HREC in the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database (DGCD) diagnosed from 2005 to 2012 were reviewed for the presence and extent of LVSI (categorized using a 3-tiered definition). We used the Kaplan-Meier analysis to calculate actuarial survival rates, both adjusted and unadjusted Cox regression analyses were used to calculate the proportional hazard ratio (HR). A total of 376 patients were included in our analysis. Among 305 patients with stage I/II HREC, 8.2% and 6.2% had focal or substantial LVSI, respectively, compared with 12.7% and 38.0% of 71 patients with stage III/IV HREC, respectively. Moreover, the estimated 5-yr recurrence-free survival rate was significantly lower among patients with substantial LVSI compared with patients with no LVSI for both stage I/II (HR: 2.8; P=0.011) and stage III/IV (HR: 2.9; P=0.003) patients. Similarly, overall survival was significantly lower among patients with substantial LVSI for both stage I/II (HR: 3.1; P<0.001) and stage III/IV (HR: 3.2; P=0.020) patients. In patients with HREC, substantial LVSI is an independent adverse prognostic factor for lymph node and distant metastases, leading to reduced survival. Thus, the extent of LVSI should be incorporated into routine pathology reports in order to guide the appropriate choice of adjuvant treatment.
Collapse
|
889
|
Comba C, Demirayak G, Simsek C, Atas BS, Özdemir İA. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (VNOTES) total retroperitoneal sentinel lymph node biopsy for an endometrial cancer patient with prior colon cancer surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1386-1387. [PMID: 34380707 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Cihan Comba
- Gynecologic Oncology, Sultangazi Haseki Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Gokhan Demirayak
- Gynecologic Oncology, Health Science University, Bakırkoy Dr Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Cigdem Simsek
- Gynecologic Oncology, Sultangazi Haseki Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Busra Seker Atas
- Gynecologic Oncology, Sultangazi Haseki Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | |
Collapse
|
890
|
Akış S, Kabaca C, Keleş E, Öztürk UK, Özyürek E, Api M, Çetiner H, Bostancı E. Tumor diameter as a predictor of lymph node involvement in endometrioid type endometrial adenocarcinomas. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2021; 47:3968-3978. [PMID: 34378275 DOI: 10.1111/jog.14979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
AIM To analyze the risk factors of lymph node involvement in pure endometrioid type endometrial cancer and assess factors that necessitate lymphadenectomy. METHODS Patients who had been operated on due to endometrial cancer and whose final pathology was reported as pure endometrioid carcinoma between January 2014 and January 2020 were assessed. Hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and systematic lymphadenectomy were performed in all patients. All specimens were reported by expert gynecopathologists. RESULTS The lymph node positivity rate was 14.4%. When the study population was classified according to the Mayo risk criteria; lymph node involvement in the low-risk and high-risk groups was 9.1% and 14.8%, respectively and there was no statistically difference (p > 0.05). The median of tumor size and the rate of deep myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, adnexal involvement, FIGO grade 3 tumor were found significantly higher in the positive lymph node group in univariate analysis. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cut-off value of the tumor diameter was determined as 47.5 mm (sensitivity 85%, specificity 62%). Every 10 mm increase in tumor diameter increased the risk of lymph node involvement 10 times. CONCLUSION This study defined that the tumor diameter is an independent predictor for lymphatic dissemination. In the future, it could be shown that even with new modeling based on tumor diameter, lymphadenectomy or adjuvant radiotherapy requirements would be reevaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serkan Akış
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Zeynep Kamil Women and Children Diseases Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Canan Kabaca
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Zeynep Kamil Women and Children Diseases Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Esra Keleş
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Zeynep Kamil Women and Children Diseases Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Uğur Kemal Öztürk
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Zeynep Kamil Women and Children Diseases Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Eser Özyürek
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Zeynep Kamil Women and Children Diseases Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Murat Api
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Zeynep Kamil Women and Children Diseases Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Handan Çetiner
- Department of Pathology, University of Health Sciences, Zeynep Kamil Women and Children Diseases Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Evrim Bostancı
- Department of Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Zeynep Kamil Women and Children Diseases Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
891
|
Sun S, Zou L, Wang T, Liu Z, He J, Sun X, Zhong W, Zhao F, Li X, Li S, Zhu H, Ma Z, Wang W, Jin M, Zhang F, Hou X, Wei L, Hu K. Effect of age as a continuous variable in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis in China. Aging (Albany NY) 2021; 13:19561-19574. [PMID: 34371481 PMCID: PMC8386535 DOI: 10.18632/aging.203367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To explore the effect of age at diagnosis as a continuous variable on survival and treatment choice of patients with early-stage endometrial carcinoma (EC). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with early-stage EC from January 1999 to December 2015 in multiple institutions in China. All patients received primary hysterectomy/bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy for EC confirmed pathology of stage I and II disease (FIGO 2009 staging). All patients were divided into low-risk, intermediate-risk, high-intermediate-risk and high-risk groups according to ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification. Results: The median follow-up time was 57months, and the 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 95.7%. Age as a continuous variable was an independent prognostic factor for CSS. With an increase in age, the hazard ratio (HR) for CSS increases gradually. Other independent prognostic factors included myometrial invasion (MI), grade, and chemotherapy. In the stratified analysis of age, the HRs of age on CSS in patients >70y were 5.516, 5.015, 4.469, 4.618, 5.334, and 5.821 after adjusting for cancer characteristics, local treatment, chemotherapy and treatment-related late toxicity. In patients 66-70-year-old, the HRs were 2.509, 2.074, 2.101, 2.091, 2.157 and 1.621 after adjusting for the above covariates. In patients ≤65y, there was no significant difference in the HR of age on CSS after adjustment. Conclusion: Age as a continuous variable is an independent prognostic factor and 65 year-old may be the best cut-off point for CSS in patients with early-stage EC in the Asian population. Quality of life should be given greater weight in the choice of therapeutic schedule for those patients >70 y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuai Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Lijuan Zou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, P.R. China
| | - Tiejun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Hospital Affiliated by Jilin University, Changchun, P.R. China
| | - Zi Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, P.R. China
| | - Jianli He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Ningxia, P.R. China
| | - Xiaoge Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Inner Mongolia, P.R. China
| | - Wei Zhong
- Gynaecological Oncology Radiotherapy, Affiliated Tumor Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, P.R. China
| | - Fengju Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gansu Provincial Cancer Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, P.R. China
| | - Xiaomei Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Sha Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Lanzhou, Gansu, P.R. China
| | - Hong Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Hunan, P.R. China
| | - Zhanshu Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Chi feng University, Inner Mongolia, P.R. China
| | - Wenhui Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Meng Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China
| | - Fuquan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Xiaorong Hou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Lichun Wei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University of PLA (The Fourth Military Medical University), Xi'an, P.R. China
| | - Ke Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
892
|
The role of molecular tests for adjuvant and post-surgical treatment in gynaecological cancers. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2021; 78:14-35. [PMID: 34456153 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
The adjuvant and post-surgical treatment of gynaecological cancers has historically been guided by the estimation of relapse risk based on clinicopathological factors determined at the time of cancer diagnosis. The recent advancement of genomic and molecular characterisation of gynaecological cancers has begun to shift paradigms in the selection of adjuvant treatment strategy. Recent data regarding the predictive and/or prognostic value of molecular tests in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer as well as early stage endometrial cancer have been the first such examples to enter adjuvant treatment guidelines for these diseases. In this article, we discuss the current state and future development of molecular assays for gynaecological cancers and how they impact upon treatment selection for ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancers in the post-surgical setting.
Collapse
|
893
|
Berg HF, Hjelmeland ME, Lien H, Espedal H, Fonnes T, Srivastava A, Stokowy T, Strand E, Bozickovic O, Stefansson IM, Bjørge L, Trovik J, Haldorsen IS, Hoivik EA, Krakstad C. Patient-derived organoids reflect the genetic profile of endometrial tumors and predict patient prognosis. COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE 2021; 1:20. [PMID: 35602206 PMCID: PMC9053236 DOI: 10.1038/s43856-021-00019-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A major hurdle in translational endometrial cancer (EC) research is the lack of robust preclinical models that capture both inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. This has hampered the development of new treatment strategies for people with EC. Methods EC organoids were derived from resected patient tumor tissue and expanded in a chemically defined medium. Established EC organoids were orthotopically implanted into female NSG mice. Patient tissue and corresponding models were characterized by morphological evaluation, biomarker and gene expression and by whole exome sequencing. A gene signature was defined and its prognostic value was assessed in multiple EC cohorts using Mantel-Cox (log-rank) test. Response to carboplatin and/or paclitaxel was measured in vitro and evaluated in vivo. Statistical difference between groups was calculated using paired t-test. Results We report EC organoids established from EC patient tissue, and orthotopic organoid-based patient-derived xenograft models (O-PDXs). The EC organoids and O-PDX models mimic the tissue architecture, protein biomarker expression and genetic profile of the original tissue. Organoids show heterogenous sensitivity to conventional chemotherapy, and drug response is reproduced in vivo. The relevance of these models is further supported by the identification of an organoid-derived prognostic gene signature. This signature is validated as prognostic both in our local patient cohorts and in the TCGA endometrial cancer cohort. Conclusions We establish robust model systems that capture both the diversity of endometrial tumors and intra-tumor heterogeneity. These models are highly relevant preclinical tools for the elucidation of the molecular pathogenesis of EC and identification of potential treatment strategies. To study the biology of cancer and test new potential treatments, it is important to use models that mimic patients’ tumors. Such models have largely been lacking in endometrial cancer. We therefore aimed to developing miniature tumors, called “organoids”, directly from patient tumor tissue. Our organoids maintained the characteristics and genetic features of the tumors from which they were derived, would grow into endometrial tumors in mice, and exhibited patient-specific responses to chemotherapy drugs. In summary, we have developed models that will help us better understand the biology of endometrial tumors and can be used to potentially identify new effective drugs for endometrial cancer patients. Berg et al. establish a panel of patient-derived endometrial cancer organoids and xenograft models. They show that their models recapitulate the genetic profile of the donor tumor and can be used for drug testing and development of a prognostic gene signature.
Collapse
|
894
|
Just PA, Genestie C. [Endometrial carcinomas in 2021: What to say and what to do?]. Ann Pathol 2021; 42:104-112. [PMID: 34340872 DOI: 10.1016/j.annpat.2021.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The treatment of endometrial carcinomas relies on histopathological data such as tumor type, grade, stage, and lymphovascular invasion. We herein present the recent advances in the pathological appreciation of these criteria, relying in the last 2020 WHO classification of female genital tumours. Furthermore, molecular typing of endometrial carcinoma has become a rule with strong prognostic and therapeutic implications. The TP53-mutated/serous-like and hypermutated/dMMR groups can be easily identified by the pathologist using immunohistochemistry. The ultramutated/POLE-mutated group identification requires sequencing technologies. We herein explain how easily incorporate this novel histomolecular classification, now included in scholarly society recommendations, in the pathologist routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre-Alexandre Just
- Université de Paris, APHP.Centre, site Cochin, service de Pathologie, 27, rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris cedex 14, France.
| | - Catherine Genestie
- Gustave Roussy, département de biologie et pathologie médicales, 114, rue Édouard Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
895
|
Talhouk A, McAlpine JN. Reply to Survival analysis and treatment effects in patients with endometrial cancer and POLE mutations. Cancer 2021; 127:4308-4309. [PMID: 34314024 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Aline Talhouk
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jessica N McAlpine
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
896
|
Al-Booz H. Flowchart for the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP 2020 endometrial carcinoma guidelines. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1313-1314. [PMID: 34301755 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Hoda Al-Booz
- Bristol Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
897
|
Sentinel lymph node in endometrial cancer, is the role of Nuclear Medicine specialist still needed? Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2021. [PMID: 34312107 DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2021.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
898
|
Paredes P, Díaz-Feijoo B. Management of the sentinel lymph node in endometrial cancer: Is the role of Nuclear Medicine specialists still needed? Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2021; 40:273-274. [PMID: 34312106 DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2021.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Pilar Paredes
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, CDI, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Facultat de Medicina - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Berta Díaz-Feijoo
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Facultat de Medicina - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Unidad de Ginecología Oncológica, Institut Clínic de Ginecologia, Obstetríciai Neonatologia, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
899
|
Tumor Characteristic Variations between Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Endometrial Cancer. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 9:healthcare9070902. [PMID: 34356280 PMCID: PMC8304100 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9070902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in Europe and usually diagnosed in its initial stage owing to early symptoms of abnormal bleeding. There is no population screening for this disease, although it can sometimes be accidentally diagnosed in asymptomatic patients. Our study aims to determine differences in clinical and tumor characteristics between an asymptomatic and symptomatic group of patients. This unicentric prospective observational study took place in University Hospital Brno between January 2016 and December 2019. A total of 264 patients met inclusion criteria (26% asymptomatic, 74% with reported symptoms). We did not find a statistically significant difference in clinical characteristics (menopausal status, parity, age, BMI, and serum level of CA 125) between groups. According to ultrasound examination, bleeding tumors were larger (19.5 vs. 12.7 mm, p ≤ 0.001). Definitive histology results indicated more frequent lymphovascular space invasion (p < 0.001), along with deep myometrial (p = 0.001) and cervical (p = 0.002) invasion. There was no difference in advanced stages of the tumor. We did not substantiate statistically significant difference in immunohistochemical profile (estrogen and progesterone receptors, L1 cell adhesion molecule, tumor protein p53), which is relevant for tumor recurrence risk and survival capacity. Our conclusions affirmed that bleeding occurs more often among patients with local tumor invasion into the myometrium and cervical stroma. Final International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, histology, and immunohistochemical characteristics do not significantly affect symptom appearance.
Collapse
|
900
|
Abu-Zaid A, Alomar O, Baradwan S, Abuzaid M, Alshahrani MS, Allam HS, Alqarni SMS, Nazer A, Salem H, Al-Badawi IA. Preoperative leukocytosis correlates with unfavorable pathological and survival outcomes in endometrial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021; 264:88-96. [PMID: 34298450 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2021] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
AIM To meta-analytically examine the frequency and prognostic impact of preoperative leukocytosis in endometrial carcinoma (EC). METHODS Five major databases were searched till 01-February-2021. Studies that evaluated the frequency of preoperative leukocytosis or its correlation with pathological and survival outcomes in EC patients were included. Data were pooled as mean differences (MD), odds ratios (OR), or hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS Nine retrospective studies, with low risk of bias, were included. The pooled prevalence of preoperative leukocytosis was 11.2% (95% CI: 8.2-14.3). There was a significant correlation between preoperative leukocytosis and FIGO stage III-IV (OR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.60-2.75), ≥50% myometrial invasion (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.02-1.72), lymph node involvement (OR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.29-2.59), cervical involvement (OR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.68-3.13), adnexal involvement (OR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.42-3.31), and tumor size (MD = 1.10 cm, 95% CI: 0.63-1.58). However, preoperative leukocytosis did not significantly correlate with tumor grade II-III, non-endometrioid histology, peritoneal cytology, and lympho-vascular space involvement (p > 0.05). Additionally, preoperative leukocytosis correlated with higher rates of death (OR = 2.85, 95% CI: 2.03-4.00), tumor recurrence (OR = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.21-4.61), and worse overall survival at univariate and multivariate analyses (HR = 2.90, 95% CI: 2.24-3.75 and HR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.59-2.94, respectively). As for disease-free survival, preoperative leukocytosis emerged as an independent prognostic factor on univariate (HR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.16-1.39) but not multivariate (HR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.00-1.18) analyses. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative leukocytosis is common and correlates with poor pathological and survival outcomes in EC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Abu-Zaid
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; College of Graduate Health Sciences, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
| | - Osama Alomar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saeed Baradwan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed Abuzaid
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Majed Saeed Alshahrani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faulty of Medicine, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hassan Saleh Allam
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine in Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Rabigh, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Saad Mohammed S Alqarni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Abha Maternity and Children Hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Nazer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hany Salem
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Ismail Abdulrahman Al-Badawi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|