Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin across doses (STELLAR* Trial)

Pharmacologic strategies for the prevention of atherosclerotic plaque progression

Despite improved treatment options, coronary artery disease remains the leading cause of death in men and women in industrialized societies. Reduction of atherosclerotic disease will require the development and evaluation of new classes of pharmacologic agents capable of modifying the development and progression of the atherosclerotic disease process. The direct observation of coronary plaque burden and morphology with in vivo imaging modalities has been evaluated as an end point in serial pharmacologic intervention trials. This review will describe the use of intravascular ultrasound for such studies, summarize results from recent trials and outline potential future pharmacologic targets.

Addressing cardiovascular risk beyond low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol story

A large body of evidence from numerous, well-controlled, randomized trials demonstrates that treatment with statins reduce morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although these observations are important and have resulted in the adoption of standard of care approaches to the management of CVD risk, they do not tell the whole story. When reviewing these landmark trials it is clear that on average two thirds of events are not prevented. This leads to the evaluation of risk beyond low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. This review focuses on the association of low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and increased CVD risk, the published trials that study the effect of raising HDL cholesterol on CVD outcomes, and the novel approaches toward HDL cholesterol raising that are on the horizon.

Cost of a pharmacist-directed intervention to increase treatment of hypercholesterolemia

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost of a pharmacist-directed intervention that prompts physicians to treat hypercholesterolemia more aggressively in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD).

METHODS

Health care resource use and CHD outcomes were evaluated for 612 patients with CHD followed for 2 years after an index hospitalization for an ischemic event. After discharge, the physicians of 309 patients who had been admitted from January 1--March 31, 1999, were contacted by telephone and mail concerning lipid profiles and statin therapy. These patients were the intervention group. Controls were 303 patients admitted from October 1--December 31, 1998; their physicians were not contacted. Costs of the physician-prompting intervention, clinic visits, laboratory tests, statin drugs, and CHD outcomes were compared between these two patient groups.

RESULTS

The number of clinic visits, laboratory tests, and statins prescribed was significantly greater for the intervention group versus the controls. A significantly higher percentage of patients in the intervention group (55%) than in the control group (18%) achieved their National Cholesterol Education Program target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level and had significantly better CHD outcomes. The cost of the physician-prompting intervention (pharmacist salaries, postage, telephone calls) was $102,941. For patients in the intervention and control groups, respectively, the cost of statin therapy was $352,365 and $200,087, the cost of clinic visits and laboratory tests $48,097 and $27,367, and the cost of coronary heart disease outcomes, such as myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous transluminal and coronary angioplasty, $1,073,495 and $1,741,220. The total cost was $1,576,898 and $1,968,674, respectively, for patients in the intervention and control groups. Net savings was $1394/patient over the 2-year period.

CONCLUSION

A relatively simple physician-prompting intervention involving patients with CHD significantly improved the use of lipid testing and statin therapy. Improved use of statins was associated with better CHD outcomes. As a result, the physician-prompting intervention was associated with cost savings. This intervention should be implemented for patients with CHD discharged after hospitalization for an ischemic event.

HDL cholesterol and protective factors in atherosclerosis

A low level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Epidemiological and clinical studies provide evidence that HDL-C levels are linked to rates of coronary events. The cardioprotective effects of HDL-C have been attributed to its role in reverse cholesterol transport, its effects on endothelial cells, and its antioxidant activity. Although some clinical trials suggest a benefit of raising HDL-C to reduce risk, further studies are needed, and HDL-C is still not considered a primary target of therapy in the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines. However, HDL-C should be considered as part of the patient's overall profile of established risk factors in determining treatment strategies.

Determination of carotid artery atherosclerotic lesion type and distribution in hypercholesterolemic patients with moderate carotid stenosis using noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to noninvasively determine carotid atherosclerotic lesion type and distribution and to evaluate the reproducibility of determining lesion types in asymptomatic patients with moderate hypercholesterolemia and moderate carotid artery (CA) stenosis using MRI.

METHODS

Forty-two asymptomatic patients with moderate CA stenosis underwent bilateral carotid MRI in a 1.5-T scanner using a protocol that generated 4 contrast weightings (T1, T2, proton density, and 3D time of flight). MRI-modified American Heart Association criteria were used to evaluate lesion types at 3 locations (common and internal CA [CCA and ICA, respectively] and CA bifurcation) and at the minimum lumen area. Two identical MR scans were conducted to evaluate reproducibility of lesion types.

RESULTS

Lesion types were obtained from 230 locations. Type III (39%) occurred most commonly, followed by types IV-V (25%), I-II (20%), VI (12%), and VII (4%). Type III was more commonly distributed in the CCA (n=35, 39%) and ICA (n=32, 36%). Type IV-V was more commonly distributed in the CCA (n=24, 41%) and at the bifurcation (n=21, 36%). Forty-two lesions were available at the site of minimum lumen area: type III (33%), IV-V (33%), VI (29%), and VII (5%). There was good agreement of lesion types between both MRI scans (Cohen's kappa=0.73; 95% CI: 0.65 to 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

MRI can determine lesion types reproducibly as well as the distribution of lesions in hypercholesterolemic patients with moderate CA stenosis. A wide range of lesion types, including advanced lesions, were found in these patients.

Clinical efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin in Japanese patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

Rosuvastatin is a new statin that has been shown to produce substantial dose-dependent reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in Western and Japanese hypercholesterolemic patients. Rosuvastatin efficacy and safety were assessed in an open-label, dose-titration trial of 37 Japanese patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. After an 8-week dietary lead-in period, patients received rosuvastatin on the following schedule: 10 mg/day during weeks 0-6; 20 mg/day during weeks 6-12, and 40 mg/day for weeks 12-18. Mean percentage reductions from baseline in LDL-C (49.2-56.7%), total cholesterol (39.4-45.4%), and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) (46.7-54.3%) were highly significant at each dose (p < 0.0001). Similar significant reductions in triglycerides (18.2-25.0%; p < 0.006) and increases in HDL-C (9.6-13.6%; p < 0.005) were observed. Rosuvastatin was well tolerated. Two patients withdrew from the study because of adverse events unrelated to the study treatment. No patients had clinically significant elevations in liver transaminases. Two patients exhibited a single increase in creatine kinase (one unrelated to study treatment, the other possibly related) with no muscle symptoms. Rosuvastatin produced significant beneficial changes in all lipid parameters in Japanese patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and was well tolerated.

Safety of rosuvastatin

The safety and tolerability of rosuvastatin were assessed (as of August 2003) using data from 12,400 patients who received 5 to 40 mg of rosuvastatin in a multinational phase II/III program, which represented 12,212 patient-years of continuous exposure to rosuvastatin. An integrated database was used to examine adverse events and laboratory data. In placebo-controlled trials, adverse events, irrespective of causality assessment, occurred in 57.4% of patients who received 5 to 40 mg of rosuvastatin (n = 744) and 56.8% of patients who received placebo (n = 382). In fixed-dose trials with comparator statins, 5 to 40 mg of rosuvastatin showed an adverse event profile similar to those for 10 to 80 mg of atorvastatin, 10 to 80 mg of simvastatin, and 10 to 40 mg of pravastatin. Clinically significant elevations in alanine aminotransferase (>3 times the upper limit of normal) and creatine kinase (>10 times the upper limit of normal) were uncommon (<or=0.2%) in the groups that received rosuvastatin and comparator statins. Myopathy (creatine kinase >10 times the upper limit of normal with muscle symptoms) that was possibly related to treatment occurred in <or=0.03% of patients who took rosuvastatin at doses <or=40 mg. A positive finding of proteinuria with dipstick testing at rosuvastatin doses <or=40 mg was comparable to that seen with other statins, and the development of proteinuria was not predictive of acute or progressive renal disease. No deaths in the program were attributed to rosuvastatin, and no rhabdomyolysis occurred in patients who received 5 to 40 mg of rosuvastatin. Rosuvastatin was well tolerated by a broad range of patients who had dyslipidemia, and its safety profile was similar to those of the comparator statins investigated in this extensive clinical program.

A review of the efficacy of rosuvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes

It has been estimated that 92% of individuals with type 2 diabetes, without cardiovascular disease (CVD), have a dyslipidaemic profile. Several guidelines on cardiovascular risk now recommend that patients with diabetes should be considered at high risk of CVD and should thus receive lipid-lowering therapy to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to below 2.5 mmol/L. Since their introduction in 1987, statins have revolutionized the management of CVD. The most recent statin to be introduced, rosuvastatin, has been shown to be the most effective at lowering LDL-C, as well as consistently raising HDL-C across the 10-40 mg dose range. This has been confirmed by many studies, including the Measuring Effective Reductions in Cholesterol Using Rosuvastatin Therapy (MERCURY I) study in which rosuvastatin 10 mg was shown to be more effective than commonly used doses of other statins, both for LDL-C reduction and achieving treatment target goals. The effectiveness of rosuvastatin has also been studied in type 2 diabetes patients in three studies: the URANUS (Use of Rosuvastatin vs. Atorvastatin iN type 2 diabetes mellitUS), ANDROMEDA (A raNdomized, Double-blind study to compare Rosuvastatin [10 & 20 mg] and atOrvastatin [10 & 20 Mg] in patiEnts with type II DiAbetes) and CORALL (COmpare Rosuvastatin [10-40 mg] with Atorvastatin [20-80 mg] on apo B/apo A-1 ratio in patients with type 2 diabetes meLLitus and dyslipidaemia) studies. URANUS and ANDROMEDA showed rosuvastatin to be more effective than atorvastatin at reducing LDL-C and achieving treatment target goals. CORALL demonstrated rosuvastatin 10, 20 and 40 mg to be more effective at lowering LDL-C than 20, 40 and 80 mg of atorvastatin, respectively. Ongoing studies will evaluate whether these properties of rosuvastatin translate into beneficial effects on atherosclerosis and significant reductions in cardiovascular events.

Management of metabolic syndrome: statins

Individuals who have the metabolic syndrome are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Combined dyslipidemia is an important component of metabolic syndrome, contributing to excess cardiovascular risk. Lifestyle and pharmacologic interventions are warranted for effective management of this syndrome. This article discusses the current evidence supporting the use of statins and their beneficial impact on lipid and nonlipid aspects of metabolic syndrome-related pathology.

ASCOT-LLA and the primary prevention of coronary artery disease in hypertensive patients

Although each revision of the US National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines has made increasing provision for the use of global risk assessment in determining need for and intensity of therapy, the guidelines' continued focus on low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol may result in inadequate or no treatment for individuals at high risk for coronary artery disease (CAD) who do not have substantially elevated LDL cholesterol. However, recent clinical trial evidence has shown that high-risk patients benefit from lipid-regulating therapy regardless of LDL cholesterol level. In the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial--Lipid Lowering Arm, high-risk hypertensive patients had reductions in clinical events despite not having substantially elevated LDL cholesterol at baseline. These results suggest that all hypertensive patients with additional risk factors should receive lipid-regulating statin therapy to prevent CAD events.

Comparative effects of lipid-lowering therapies

The pharmacologic regulation of lipid metabolism in patients with dyslipidemia is unequivocally associated with significant reductions in risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. A number of therapeutic drug classes have been developed in an effort to ever more precisely and intensively modulate lipid metabolism. Statins, fibrates, ezetimibe, and niacin exert their effects via different mechanisms and afford physicians the opportunity to beneficially impact multiple pathways in patients. When used alone or in combination, these drugs decrease risk for the development and progression of atherosclerotic disease. There are strong clinical trial data to support of the use of lipid-lowering therapies in the settings of both primary and secondary prevention. This article (1) discusses the mechanisms of action of antilipidemic medications, (2) reviews dosing regimens and the pharmacokinetic differences among drugs of the same class, (3) assesses risk for drug interactions, and (4) reviews the clinical trial evidence used to support the use of particular antilipidemic medications in specific physiologic settings. The incidence of dyslipidemia is rising worldwide. This trend portends an ever-growing need for the aggressive and judicious use of different antilipidemic medication(s) in patients at risk for all forms of atherosclerotic vascular disease.

Lipoprotein transport in the metabolic syndrome: pathophysiological and interventional studies employing stable isotopy and modelling methods

The accompanying review in this issue of Clinical Science [Chan, Barrett and Watts (2004) Clin. Sci. 107, 221–232] presented an overview of lipoprotein physiology and the methodologies for stable isotope kinetic studies. The present review focuses on our understanding of the dysregulation and therapeutic regulation of lipoprotein transport in the metabolic syndrome based on the application of stable isotope and modelling methods. Dysregulation of lipoprotein metabolism in metabolic syndrome may be due to a combination of overproduction of VLDL [very-LDL (low-density lipoprotein)]-apo (apolipoprotein) B-100, decreased catabolism of apoB-containing particles and increased catabolism of HDL (high-density lipoprotein)-apoA-I particles. These abnormalities may be consequent on a global metabolic effect of insulin resistance, partly mediated by depressed plasma adiponectin levels, that collectively increases the flux of fatty acids from adipose tissue to the liver, the accumulation of fat in the liver and skeletal muscle, the hepatic secretion of VLDL-triacylglycerols and the remodelling of both LDL (low-density lipoprotein) and HDL particles in the circulation. These lipoprotein defects are also related to perturbations in both lipolytic enzymes and lipid transfer proteins. Our knowledge of the pathophysiology of lipoprotein metabolism in the metabolic syndrome is well complemented by extensive cell biological data. Nutritional modifications may favourably alter lipoprotein transport in the metabolic syndrome by collectively decreasing the hepatic secretion of VLDL-apoB and the catabolism of HDL-apoA-I, as well as by potentially increasing the clearance of LDL-apoB. Several pharmacological treatments, such as statins, fibrates or fish oils, can also correct the dyslipidaemia by diverse kinetic mechanisms of action, including decreased secretion and increased catabolism of apoB, as well as increased secretion and decreased catabolism of apoA-I. The complementary mechanisms of action of lifestyle and drug therapies support the use of combination regimens in treating dyslipoproteinaemia in subjects with the metabolic syndrome.

Familial hypercholesterolemia in children

PURPOSE OF THIS REVIEW

This review provides an update on recent advances in the diagnosis and management of children with familial hypercholesterolemia.

RECENT FINDINGS

A large cross-sectional cohort study of paediatric familial hypercholesterolemia demonstrated that affected children had a 5-fold more rapid increase of carotid arterial wall intima-media thickness during childhood years than their affected siblings. This faster progression led to a significant deviation in terms of intima-media thickness from the age of 12 years and onwards. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was a strong and independent predictor of carotid artery intima-media thickness in these children, which confirms the pivotal role of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol for the development of atherosclerosis. In this condition lipid lowering by statin therapy is accompanied by carotid intima-media thickness regression in familial-hypercholesterolemic children, which suggests that initiation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-reducing medication in childhood already can inhibit or possibly reduce the faster progression of atherosclerosis. Furthermore, these trials demonstrated that statins are safe and do not impair growth or sexual development in these children. Conversely, products containing plant sterols reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 14%, but did not improve endothelial dysfunction as assessed by flow-mediated dilatation.

SUMMARY

Children with familial hypercholesterolemia clearly benefit from lipid-lowering strategies. Statins are safe agents and have been proven to reduce elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels significantly. In addition, statins improve surrogate markers for atherosclerosis. Therefore these agents should become the pivotal therapy in children with familial hypercholesterolemia.

The triglyceride-high-density lipoprotein axis: an important target of therapy?

Coronary heart disease is the single largest cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. The link between elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and coronary heart disease (CHD) has been clearly established. However, triglycerides (TG) are increasingly believed to be independently associated with CHD, while high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) is inversely associated with CHD risk. High TG and low HDL often occur together, often with normal levels of LDL-C, and can be described as abnormalities of the TG-HDL axis. This lipid abnormality is a fundamental characteristic of patients with the metabolic syndrome, a condition strongly associated with the development of both type 2 diabetes and CHD. Patients with high TG and low HDL-C should be aggressively treated with therapeutic lifestyle changes. For high-risk patients, lipid-modifying therapy that specifically addresses the TG-HDL axis should also be considered. Current pharmacologic treatment options for such patients include statins, fibrates, niacin, fish oils, and combinations thereof. Several new pharmacologic approaches to treating the TG-HDL axis are currently being investigated. More clinical trial data is needed to test the hypothesis that pharmacologic therapy targeting the TG-HDL axis reduces atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events.

Implications of Recent Clinical Trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines

The Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) of the National Cholesterol Education Program issued an evidence-based set of guidelines on cholesterol management in 2001. Since the publication of ATP III, 5 major clinical trials of statin therapy with clinical end points have been published. These trials addressed issues that were not examined in previous clinical trials of cholesterol-lowering therapy. The present document reviews the results of these recent trials and assesses their implications for cholesterol management. Therapeutic lifestyle changes (TLC) remain an essential modality in clinical management. The trials confirm the benefit of cholesterol-lowering therapy in high-risk patients and support the ATP III treatment goal of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <100 mg/dL. They support the inclusion of patients with diabetes in the high-risk category and confirm the benefits of LDL-lowering therapy in these patients. They further confirm that older persons benefit from therapeutic lowering of LDL-C. The major recommendations for modifications to footnote the ATP III treatment algorithm are the following. In high-risk persons, the recommended LDL-C goal is <100 mg/dL, but when risk is very high, an LDL-C goal of <70 mg/dL is a therapeutic option, ie, a reasonable clinical strategy, on the basis of available clinical trial evidence. This therapeutic option extends also to patients at very high risk who have a baseline LDL-C < 100 mg/dL. Moreover, when a high-risk patient has high triglycerides or low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), consideration can be given to combining a fibrate or nicotinic acid with an LDL-lowering drug. For moderately high-risk persons (2+ risk factors and 10-year risk 10% to 20%), the recommended LDL-C goal is <130 mg/dL, but an LDL-C goal <100 mg/dL is a therapeutic option on the basis of recent trial evidence. The latter option extends also to moderately high-risk persons with a baseline LDL-C of 100 to 129 mg/dL. When LDL-lowering drug therapy is employed in high-risk or moderately high-risk persons, it is advised that intensity of therapy be sufficient to achieve at least a 30% to 40% reduction in LDL-C levels. Moreover, any person at high risk or moderately high risk who has lifestyle-related risk factors (eg, obesity, physical inactivity, elevated triglycerides, low HDL-C, or metabolic syndrome) is a candidate for TLC to modify these risk factors regardless of LDL-C level. Finally, for people in lower-risk categories, recent clinical trials do not modify the goals and cutpoints of therapy.

The care gap: underuse of statin therapy in the elderly

Atherosclerotic diseases are responsible for the majority of deaths in the elderly, and they can also increase the risk of disability. Statins are first-line therapies for lowering lipid levels and have been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in large-scale clinical trials. There is a growing body of evidence that statins are as efficacious at lowering lipid levels and reducing the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in elderly patients as in younger individuals. Furthermore, as this population is at a greater absolute risk of CHD, they may receive greater absolute benefits from treatment. However, despite these benefits, many elderly individuals at risk of CHD and stroke are not receiving adequate lipid-lowering therapy, which could help them to maintain their health and independence. Further, prospective randomised trials are required to guide physicians in the treatment of elderly patients at risk of atherosclerotic disease, thereby resolving the current undertreatment.

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein, inflammation, and cardiovascular risk: from concept to clinical practice to clinical benefit

Advances in vascular biology have shown that inflammation plays an integral role in the development of cardiovascular disease. Extensive study of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) has demonstrated that this measure of inflammation predicts cardiovascular risk not reflected by traditional risk factors, adds prognostic information to traditional risk assessment, and predicts long-term cardiovascular risk in individuals with no prior evidence of cardiovascular disease. Patients with elevated hs-CRP levels in the absence of elevated cholesterol appear to derive preventive benefit from statin therapy that is similar in magnitude to that in patients with elevated cholesterol. The large-scale Justification for the Use of statins in Primary prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosvastatin (JUPITER) trial represents a critical study to determine the utility of a strategy for targeting statin therapy to prevent incident cardiovascular disease in patients at increased cardiovascular risk on the basis of elevated hs-CRP who would not be considered candidates for therapy on the basis of hypercholesterolemia or traditional risk assessment. Inclusion of hs-CRP measurement in risk screening and use of this information to guide preventive therapy could result in a marked improvement in prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Statins as the cornerstone of drug therapy for dyslipidemia: monotherapy and combination therapy options

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol reduction with statin treatment remains the cornerstone of lipid-lowering therapy to reduce risk of coronary heart disease. Combination therapy with a statin poses advantages in certain settings and may allow use of lower doses of multiple drugs rather than maximum doses of a single drug. Bile-acid sequestrants or the cholesterol-absorption inhibitor ezetimibe can be added to a statin to achieve greater LDL cholesterol reductions. Niacin or fenofibrate can be added to a statin for treatment of mixed dyslipidemia. Differences in statin efficacy in reducing LDL cholesterol and meeting recommended LDL cholesterol targets as well as differences among these agents in beneficial effects on other lipid parameters can affect whether and how these agents are prescribed in monotherapy and combination therapy.

Improving lipid management--to titrate, combine or switch

Despite the benefits of statin therapy, cholesterol management remains suboptimal and many patients do not achieve their recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. The use of insufficient doses, limited drug effectiveness and poor patient compliance may contribute to the treatment gap. Options for improving lipid management include dose titration, combination therapy or prescribing a more efficacious statin. LDL-C reductions are generally modest when patients' current statin dose is titrated, and there may be an increased potential for adverse effects. Combining statin therapy with another lipid-modifying agent can provide additional LDL-C reductions, but cost, tolerability and compliance should be considered. In general, switching to a more efficacious statin is a cost-effective way of enabling more patients to achieve recommended targets without increasing dosages. When considering the options available, physicians should balance efficacy, cost and safety to enable more patients to attain LDL-C goals and achieve greater therapeutic gain from statin treatment.

Optimal low-density lipoprotein is 50 to 70 mg/dl: lower is better and physiologically normal

The normal low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol range is 50 to 70 mg/dl for native hunter-gatherers, healthy human neonates, free-living primates, and other wild mammals (all of whom do not develop atherosclerosis). Randomized trial data suggest atherosclerosis progression and coronary heart disease events are minimized when LDL is lowered to <70 mg/dl. No major safety concerns have surfaced in studies that lowered LDL to this range of 50 to 70 mg/dl. The current guidelines setting the target LDL at 100 to 115 mg/dl may lead to substantial undertreatment in high-risk individuals.

Approximate equivalent rosuvastatin doses for temporary statin interchange programs

OBJECTIVE

To estimate approximate doses of rosuvastatin equivalent to the other hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) for a temporary substitution program.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was conducted to locate clinical trials directly comparing rosuvastatin with other statins that evaluated the magnitude of cholesterol lowering.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The mean low-density lipoprotein and total cholesterol values from the clinical trials were assessed. Study results indicate that rosuvastatin is not equivalent to other statins on a milligram-to-milligram basis.

CONCLUSIONS

Rosuvastatin appears to be at least 2 and 4 times as potent as atorvastatin and simvastatin, respectively, and at least 8 times as potent as pravastatin and lovastatin.

Effects of lipid-altering treatment in diabetes mellitus and the metabolic syndrome

The metabolic syndrome (MS) poses an increased risk for the development of diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular events. The syndrome typically includes dyslipidemia, characterized by elevated plasma triglycerides and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations. Retrospective analyses of coronary artery disease outcomes trials in patient subpopulations with diabetes or the MS indicate that lipid-altering therapies provide benefits for patients with the MS at least as much as observed in patients without diabetes or the MS. Analyses of the effects of lipid-altering therapy on the lipid profile in patients with the MS also indicate that beneficial lipid changes are similar in patients with the MS compared with those in patients without the MS. The benefits of statin treatment in patients with the MS have become increasingly clear, and it is likely that further improvements in treatment may be achieved with newer statins or a combination of lipid-altering drugs. Prospective data from clinical trials examining the preventive effects of lipid-altering therapy in MS patients are needed to better define potential benefits and optimal treatment in this population.

HDL: a recipe for longevity

The concentration of high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) has been found to be a powerful negative predictor of premature coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke in human prospective population studies. Evidence of the protective properties of HDLs has also been documented in the elderly and their offspring. HDLs mediate several functions that provide an insight into their potential anti-atherogenic mechanisms. Intervention strategies to prevent CHD have generally focused on lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). However, several lifestyle and pharmacological interventions have the capacity to raise the level of HDL-C. As data accumulate on the protective role of HDLs, there is growing support for interventions that act to raise HDL-C concentrations.

Coronary heart disease and lipid-modifying treatment in African American patients

African Americans have the highest overall coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality rate of any ethnic group in the United States. They also exhibit a greater prevalence of a number of individual CHD risk factors, especially hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a CHD risk equivalent) and greater clustering of risk factors. The African-American population is under-represented in lipid-lowering clinical end point trials and remains inadequately treated with lipid-lowering therapy in the clinical setting; this latter fact is of particular concern because, in the new National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines, many more black patients with hypercholesterolemia should be receiving more intensive lipid-lowering treatment. A number of steps must be taken to improve prospects of CHD risk reduction through lipid-lowering therapy in African Americans. These include improving the understanding of the relationship of risk factors to disease and improving the understanding of both lipid responses to and clinical benefits of lipid-lowering therapy. In addition, because African Americans have a higher prevalence of several modifiable CHD risk factors, this population should be rigorously targeted for risk-reduction strategies, including screening and treatment for hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia. Educational outreach programs can provide a key role in raising community awareness of CHD risk factors and potential treatment options.

Drug-induced liver disease in 2003

Drug-induced liver disease remains an important topic of concern for all prescribers as well as drug manufacturers. The withdrawal of troglitazone (Rezulin) and bromfenac (Duract) a few years ago remains fresh in the minds of regulatory authorities as well as clinicians and researchers who are focusing renewed attention on ways to better understand mechanisms of injury to predict and avert serious drug-induced liver disease in the future from drugs under development as well as existing agents known to cause liver injury. As in past years, this review describes new and first-time reports of various aspects of drug-induced liver disease for several classes of compounds, including herbal products (such as kava kava), reviews the risk factors seen with antiretroviral and antituberculosis agents among others. It provides a sampling of experimental hepatoprotection studies that may hold the key to treatment and prevention of drug-induced liver disease in the future and discusses the ongoing approaches to be taken to restrict the availability of acetaminophen that have proved successful in reducing the number of overdoses, deaths, and liver transplantations from this drug in the United Kingdom. Given the fact that acetaminophen is the single most important cause of acute liver failure here and abroad, such efforts to limit its use seem appropriate for other nations as well.

Drug approval highlights for 2003

In the past 12 months, the FDA has approved important new pharmaceutical drugs and devices of particular interest to primary health care providers. The drugs include: Oxytrol (for urinary incontinence), Valtrex (for reducing the risk of heterosexual transmission of genital herpes), Femring (for vaginal delivery of hormone therapy), Uroxatral (for benign prostatic hypertrophy), Levitra (for erectile dysfunction), Flumist (for preventing influenza), Xolair (for asthma), Raptiva (for psoriasis), Cubicin (for skin infections), Crestor (for hypercholesterolemia), and Coreg (for severe heart failure).

Effects of switching statins on achievement of lipid goals: Measuring Effective Reductions in Cholesterol Using Rosuvastatin Therapy (MERCURY I) study

BACKGROUND

In a multinational trial (4522IL/0081), we assessed the effects of switching to low doses of rosuvastatin from commonly used doses of atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal achievement in high-risk patients.

METHODS

Hypercholesterolemic patients (n = 3140) with coronary heart disease, atherosclerosis, or type 2 diabetes were randomized to open-label rosuvastatin 10 mg, atorvastatin 10 or 20 mg, simvastatin 20 mg, or pravastatin 40 mg for 8 weeks. Patients either remained on these treatments for another 8 weeks or switched treatments from atorvastatin 10 mg, simvastatin 20 mg, and pravastatin 40 mg to rosuvastatin 10 mg or from atorvastatin 20 mg to rosuvastatin 10 or 20 mg. The primary efficacy measure was the proportion of patients reaching the Joint European Societies' LDL-C goal (<116 mg/dL) at week 16. For measures of cholesterol goal achievement, treatment arms were compared using logistic-regression analysis.

RESULTS

Significant improvement in LDL-C goal achievement was found for patients who switched to rosuvastatin 10 mg, compared with patients who remained on atorvastatin 10 mg (86% vs 80%, P <.05), simvastatin 20 mg (86% vs 72%, P <.0001), and pravastatin 40 mg (88% vs 66%, P <.0001), and between patients switched to rosuvastatin 20 mg and those who remained on atorvastatin 20 mg (90% vs 84%, P <.01). Similar results were found for achievement of the European combined LDL-C and total cholesterol goals and National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III LDL-C goals. All statins were well tolerated over 16 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that switching to a more efficacious statin is an effective strategy to improve lipid goal achievement in patients requiring lipid-lowering therapy.

Metabolism, excretion, and pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin in healthy adult male volunteers

BACKGROUND

Rosuvastatin is a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A-reductase inhibitor, or statin, that has been developed for the treatment of dyslipidemia.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the metabolism, excretion, and pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of radiolabeled rosuvastatin ([14C]-rosuvastatin) in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

This was a nonrandomized, open-label, single-day trial. Healthy adult male volunteers were given a single oral dose of [14C]-rosuvastatin 20 mg (20 mL [14C]-rosuvastatin solution, nominally containing 50 microCi radioactivity). Blood, urine, and fecal samples were collected up to 10 days after dosing. Tolerability assessments were made up to 10 days after dosing (trial completion) and at a follow-up visit within 14 days of trial completion.

RESULTS

Six white male volunteers aged 36 to 52 years (mean, 43.7 years) participated in the trial. The geometric mean peak plasma concentration (C(max)) of rosuvastatin was 6.06 ng/mL and was reached at a median of 5 hours after dosing. At C(max), rosuvastatin accounted for approximately 50% of the circulating radioactive material. Approximately 90% of the rosuvastatin dose was recovered in feces, with the remainder recovered in urine. The majority of the dose (approximately 70%) was recovered within 72 hours after dosing; excretion was complete by 10 days after dosing. Metabolite profiles in feces indicated that rosuvastatin was excreted largely unchanged (76.8% of the dose). Two metabolites-rosuvastatin-5S-lactone and N-desmethyl rosuvastatin-were present in excreta. [14C]-rosuvastatin was well tolerated; 2 volunteers reported 4 mild adverse events that resolved without treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of the rosuvastatin dose was excreted unchanged. Given the absolute bioavailability (20%) and estimated absorption (approximately 50%) of rosuvastatin, this finding suggests that metabolism is a minor route of clearance for this agent.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction and cardiovascular disease prevention: the search for superior treatment

Current US lipid-lowering guidelines indicate that optimal plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are <100 mg/dL, and targeting global risk assessment has significantly increased the number of individuals who are candidates for intensive plasma lipid-lowering therapy. There is accumulating evidence that reduction of plasma LDL-C concentrations to targets even lower than those currently recommended may provide additional benefit in coronary heart disease (CHD) prevention. For example, the Heart Protection Study (HPS) found that statin treatment initiated at a baseline LDL-C plasma level of <100 mg/dL in patients at high risk provided a relative benefit in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular events that was similar to when it was initiated at higher LDL-C plasma levels. In addition, it is becoming clear that CHD risk, and the need for intensive lipid-lowering treatment, may be underestimated in some populations, including individuals with the metabolic syndrome. In the overall primary prevention population, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein measurement has been shown to identify individuals at high risk of cardiovascular events who would not be considered at high risk on the basis of current systems of risk assessment. The increasing focus on intensive plasma lipid lowering to reduce CHD risk has placed a premium on the development of therapies with improved ability to reduce plasma levels of LDL-C.

Atherosclerosis measured by B-mode ultrasonography: effect of statin therapy on disease progression

Changes in intima-media thickness (IMT) and arterial lumen diameter-as measured by B-mode high-resolution ultrasonography and quantitative coronary angiography, respectively-are currently the only surrogate markers for progression of atherosclerotic disease recognized by regulatory authorities in the United States and Europe. Because atherosclerosis is a disease of the arterial wall, the ability of B-mode ultrasonography to provide visualization of IMT offers significant advantages over angiography. These advantages, as well as the safety and noninvasiveness of B-mode ultrasonography, have led to increasing use of this imaging technique in observational studies and interventional studies of lipid-lowering agents over the last decade. These observational studies clearly demonstrated an association between carotid IMT and atherosclerotic disease. Of the interventional studies, the recent Arterial Biology for the Investigation of the Treatment Effects of Reducing Cholesterol (ARBITER) trial found that use of atorvastatin 80 mg daily for aggressive lowering of plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations to below current target levels was associated with significant IMT regression compared with results obtained with less aggressive plasma LDL-C lowering. A new study-Measuring Effects on Intima Media Thickness: an Evaluation of Rosuvastatin (METEOR)-will examine the effects of aggressive lipid-lowering treatment with rosuvastatin 40 mg daily on IMT. The cohort in this study will be individuals with mild hypercholesterolemia whose standard risk assessment does not categorize them as at sufficient risk of clinical disease to warrant initiation of lipid-lowering therapy despite their relatively high IMT values.

Inflammation and atherosclerosis: role of C-reactive protein in risk assessment

Inflammation participates critically in atherosclerosis. Circulating levels of several inflammatory markers rise in individuals at risk for atherosclerotic events. In particular, elevation of plasma C-reactive protein (CRP), a nonspecific acute-phase reactant that is easily and reliably measured, has strong predictive power for cardiovascular events. Indeed, measurements of high-sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP) plasma levels add to both the prognostic information gleaned from assay of plasma lipid risk factors and the risk levels estimated by means of Framingham study-based criteria. Retrospective data suggest the hypothesis that hs-CRP plasma levels may be useful for guiding use of lipid-lowering therapy in individuals who appear to be at low risk according to traditional risk assessment. A large-scale, randomized clinical trial-Justification for the Use of Statins in Primary Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER)-will test whether rosuvastatin therapy will reduce incident cardiovascular disease in subjects with elevated plasma hs-CRP concentrations who do not meet current criteria for initiation of lipid-lowering drug therapy. Such clinical trial data may provide an evidence base for the use of plasma CRP assay as an adjuvant guide to therapy to complement the established traditional risk factors such as plasma lipid levels. Thus, medical practitioners are ushering in an era in which the biology of inflammation in atherosclerosis will find its way into clinical application.

New drugs for the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia

Endogenous and exogenous pathways determine plasma levels of cholesterol and lipoproteins. Plasma cholesterol levels and coronary heart disease risk can be reduced pharmacologically by decreasing cholesterol synthesis, increasing its elimination and/or reducing its absorption from the intestine. The more profound knowledge about cholesterol homeostasis has allowed the development of several lipid-lowering drugs with different mechanisms of action, with the purpose of reducing both morbidity and mortality associated with coronary heart disease. Two new and more potent 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins), also called superstatins (rosuvastatin and pitavastatin), are being studied for their ability to improve lipid profiles. Rosuvastatin is a potent, hepato-selective and relatively hydrophilic statin with a low propensity for muscle toxicity and drug interactions. Pitavastatin is another statin with a high oral bioavailability and minimal propensity for cytochrome p450-mediated drug interactions. Rosuvastatin seems to be more potent than other available statins while pitavastatin presents with a similar potency to that of atorvastatin. Another promising approach for lowering total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels is inhibition of cholesterol absorption. A wide variety of new agents with the capacity for inhibiting the intestinal cholesterol absorption is currently being investigated. Ezetimibe is a selective cholesterol absorption inhibitor whose clinical efficacy has been recently demonstrated both in monotherapy and in combination with other lipid-lowering drugs. Colesevelam, a new bile acid sequestrant, has shown a clinical efficacy similar to that of other resins, with minimal gastrointestinal side effects, improving tolerability and patient compliance. Other lipid-lowering drugs with the ability to act at the enterocyte level, such as avasimibe and implitapide, are currently being investigated in humans.

Current overview of statin-induced myopathy

Statins are an efficacious and well-tolerated class of lipid-altering agents that have been shown to reduce the risk of initial and recurrent cardiovascular events. However, cerivastatin was withdrawn from the world market because of its potential for severe myotoxic effects. Since the benefits of statin treatment outweigh the small risk of adverse events, statins remain the first-line therapy for lipid lowering and preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. The risk of myopathy may be minimized with the appropriate choice of agent and by identifying patients at risk of myotoxic effects. Elderly or female patients, or those with concomitant medications or impaired metabolic processes, may be at increased risk and should be monitored closely. The risk of myopathy may also be inferred from the pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic properties of the statin used. Since myotoxic events are more frequent at higher doses, statins that are effective in reducing cholesterol levels and helping patients to reach target levels at start doses may be useful. The lipophilicity of a statin and its potential for drug-drug interactions may also help to determine the likelihood of muscular effects. Drug-drug interactions may be avoided by selecting a statin that does not share the same metabolic pathway.

Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disorder of lipoprotein metabolism characterized by very high plasma concentrations of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc), tendon xanthomas and increased risk of premature coronary heart disease (CHD). FH is a public health problem throughout the world. There are 10,000,000 people with FH worldwide, mainly heterozygotes, and approximately 85% of males and 50% of females with FH will suffer a coronary event before 65 years old if appropriate preventive efforts are not implemented. Early identification of persons with FH and their relatives, and the early start of treatment are essential issues in the prevention of premature cardiovascular disease (CVD) and death in this population. However, guidelines for the general population formally exclude FH from their diagnostic and treatment recommendations. These guidelines have been elaborated by a group of international experts with the intention to answer the main questions about heterozygous FH (heFH) subjects that physicians worldwide face in the diagnosis and management of these patients.

Apolipoprotein B and apolipoprotein A-I: risk indicators of coronary heart disease and targets for lipid-modifying therapy

Although LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) is associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease, other lipoproteins and their constituents, apolipoproteins, may play an important role in atherosclerosis. Elevated levels of apolipoprotein (apo) B, a constituent of atherogenic lipoproteins, and reduced levels of apo A-I, a component of anti-atherogenic HDL, are associated with increased cardiac events. Apo B, apo A-I and the apo B/apo A-I ratio have been reported as better predictors of cardiovascular events than LDL-C and they even retain their predictive power in patients receiving lipid-modifying therapy. Measurement of these apolipoproteins could improve cardiovascular risk prediction.

Rosuvastatin improves the atherogenic and atheroprotective lipid profiles in patients with hypertriglyceridemia

BACKGROUND

We examined the effects of rosuvastatin treatment on triglyceride levels and lipid measures in a parallel-group multicenter trial (4522IL/0035) in patients with hypertriglyceridemia (Fredrickson Type IIb or IV).

METHODS

After a 6-week dietary lead-in period while on a National Cholesterol Education Program step I diet, 156 patients with fasting triglyceride levels >/= 300 and < 800 mg/dl were randomized to 6 weeks of double-blinded treatment: once-daily rosuvastatin of 5, 10, 20, 40 or 80 mg or placebo. The primary end point was mean percentage change from baseline in total serum triglyceride levels at week 6 as determined by analysis of variance.

RESULTS

Rosuvastatin at all doses produced significant mean reductions in triglycerides compared with placebo (-18 to -40 compared with +2.9%, P </= 0.001); median reductions in triglycerides with rosuvastatin at 5-80 mg ranged from -21 to -46%. All doses of rosuvastatin significantly reduced levels of atherogenic lipoprotein and apolipoproteins over placebo, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B and apolipoprotein C-III. Statistically significant increases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were observed with rosuvastatin doses > 5 mg. The occurrence of adverse events was generally low and not dose related, although some adverse events occurred more frequently in the rosuvastatin 80 mg group.

CONCLUSIONS

Rosuvastatin reduced triglyceride levels and improved the overall atherogenic and atheroprotective lipid profiles in hypertriglyceridemic patients.

Coronary heart disease risk reduction in postmenopausal women: the role of statin therapy and hormone replacement therapy

The incidence of coronary heart disease in women rises sharply in the years following menopause, and prescribing of hormone replacement therapy in the belief that it might compensate for the loss of estrogen-mediated cardioprotection is widespread. However, controlled trials have failed to show a beneficial effect of hormone replacement therapy on the incidence of coronary events, and recent evidence suggests that hormone replacement therapy may even have a deleterious effect on primary coronary heart disease prevention. Statins are recommended as first-line treatment for lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in women and are extremely valuable in reducing coronary heart disease risk in this group. An awareness of the benefits of appropriate statin treatment, and evidence showing that they can be safely added to hormone replacement therapy prescribed for the relief of menopausal symptoms and osteoporosis, provides the opportunity to optimize clinical outcomes for coronary heart disease among the large and expanding population of postmenopausal women.

Rosuvastatin Calcium

Each month, subscribers to The Formulary Monograph Service receive five to six well-documented monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late Phase III trials. The monographs are targeted to your Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee. Subscribers also receive monthly one-page summary monographs on the agents that are useful for agendas and pharmacy/nursing in-services. A comprehensive target drug utilization evaluation (DUE) is also provided each month. With a subscription, the monographs are sent to you in print and CD ROM forms and are available online. Monographs can be customized to meet the needs of your facility. Subscribers to the The Formulary Monograph Service also receive access to a pharmacy bulletin board, The Formulary Information Exchange (The F.I.X.). All topics pertinent to clinical and hospital pharmacy are discussed on The F.I.X.

Through the cooperation of The Formulary, Hospital Pharmacy publishes selected reviews in this column. If you would like information about The Formulary Monograph Service or The F.I.X., call The Formulary at 800–322–4349. The January 2004 monograph topics are risperidone long-acting injection; efalizumab; epinastine HCL ophthalmic solution; prussian blue; and bevacizumab. The DUE is on polonosetron.

Comparison of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HFH) is a common genetic disorder that confers a significantly increased risk of early coronary artery disease. This study compared atorvastatin and rosuvastatin in reducing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in HFH in a global, 18-week, weighted-randomization, double-blind, parallel-group, forced-titration study. Following a 6-week diet lead-in, 623 patients were randomized to 20 mg/day of atorvastatin (n = 187) or rosuvastatin (n = 436) with forced titration at 6-week intervals to 80 mg/day. The primary end point was percentage change in LDL cholesterol from baseline to week 18. At week 18, rosuvastatin therapy produced a significantly greater reduction in LDL cholesterol than atorvastatin (-57.9% vs -50.4%; p <0.001) and a significantly greater increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (12.4% vs 2.9%; p <0.001). Rosuvastatin also produced significantly greater reductions in apolipoprotein-B and all 4 major lipid ratios, as well as a significantly greater increases in apolipoprotein A-I (all p <0.001). More patients with HFH with coronary artery disease achieved the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III goal of LDL cholesterol <100 mg/dl (<2.6 mmol/L) on rosuvastatin 40 and 80 mg than atorvastatin 80 mg (17%, 24%, and 4.5%, respectively). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein median values were reduced by 33% to 34% in both the 80-mg rosuvastatin- and atorvastatin-treated groups. Both treatments were well tolerated. Thus, in HFH, rosuvastatin force titrated from 20 to 80 mg/day produced significantly greater reductions than atorvastatin 20 to 80 mg/day in LDL cholesterol and improvements in HDL cholesterol and other lipid parameters, and enabled more patients to achieve LDL cholesterol goals.

Newer pharmaceutical agents to treat lipid disorders

The National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines and the results of the Heart Protection Study have provided a stronger rationale to more aggressively treat high-risk patients to a low-density (LDL) cholesterol goal of less than 100 mL/dL. Two new therapies, ezetimibe and rosuvastatin, have recently been added to the lipid-lowering armamentarium to improve guideline adherence. Ezetimibe, a novel cholesterol absorption inhibitor, lowers LDL by 18% to 20% and can be used safely in combination with statins. Adding ezetimibe to a statin is comparable with the LDL-lowering efficacy of tripling the dose of the statin. Rosuvastatin is a highly efficacious statin providing 8% greater LDL reduction than equivalent doses of atorvastatin, and the starting dose of 10 mg/d provides nearly a 50% reduction in LDL cholesterol. There are several investigational drugs in development for the prevention and treatment of atherosclerosis. Of these investigational drugs, the most promising are the cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibitors, which have the potential to significantly raise high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and acetyl-coenzyme A: cholesterol acyltransferase inhibitors, which may directly inhibit the progression of atherosclerosis.

Benefit-risk assessment of Rosuvastatin 10 to 40 milligrams

The aim of this article is to examine the benefit-risk profile of rosuvastatin at doses of 10 to 40 mg. In dyslipidemic patients, rosuvastatin produced markedly greater reductions in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and equivalent or greater improvements in various lipid measures, including high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides when compared with atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin. In addition, rosuvastatin is more effective than these statins in allowing patients to reach National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III and Joint European Societies LDL cholesterol goals. The safety profile of rosuvastatin was reviewed (as of April 2003) in 12,569 patients, representing 14,231 patient-years of treatment at doses up to 80 mg. In controlled trials, rosuvastatin 10 to 40 mg demonstrated a similar adverse event profile to those for atorvastatin 10 to 80 mg, simvastatin 10 to 80 mg, and pravastatin 10 to 40 mg. Myopathy (defined as muscle symptoms plus serum creatine kinase levels >10 times the upper limit of normal) attributed to rosuvastatin occurred in < or = 0.03% of patients receiving rosuvastatin 10 to 40 mg. No cases of rhabdomyolysis occurred in patients receiving rosuvastatin 10 to 40 mg. Clinically significant alanine aminotransferase elevations occurred in 0.2% of patients receiving rosuvastatin and those receiving atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin. Compared with other widely used statins, the benefit-risk profile of rosuvastatin 10 to 40 mg appears to be very favorable.