The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7 chaperonin complex

Role of the GroEL chaperonin intermediate domain in coupling ATP hydrolysis to polypeptide release

Modification of the Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL with N-ethylmaleimide at residue Cys138 affects the structural and functional integrity of the complex. Nucleotide affinity and ATPase activity of the modified chaperonin are increased, whereas cooperativity of ATP hydrolysis and affinity for GroES are reduced. As a consequence, release and folding of substrate proteins are strongly impaired and uncoupled from ATP hydrolysis in a temperature-dependent manner. Folding of dihydrofolate reductase at 25 degrees C becomes dependent on GroES, whereas folding of typically GroES-dependent proteins is blocked completely. At 37 degrees C, GroES binding is restored to normal levels, and the modified GroEL regains its chaperone activity to some extent. These results assign a central role to the intermediate GroEL domain for transmitting conformational changes between apical and central domains, and for coupling ATP hydrolysis to productive protein release.

Sequence motifs shared between chaperone components participating in the assembly of progesterone receptor complexes

Steroid receptors typically exist in a heteromeric complex with Hsp90 and other components of the molecular chaperone machinery. Assembly of functional receptor complexes follows an ordered pathway involving at least eight chaperone components, some only participating in early assembly stages that are prerequisite for formation of mature complexes. The mechanisms directing the order of assembly steps and the nature of transitional interactions between assembly steps are largely unknown, but likely are encoded in the primary sequence and functional domains of the participating chaperones. Several common sequence motifs are shared between participants that may be key in ordering the steroid receptor assembly pathway.

Insight into the conformation of protein folding intermediate(s) trapped by GroEL

Many aspects of the mechanism by which the GroEL/ES chaperonins mediate protein folding are still unclear, including the amount of structure present in the substrate bound to GroEL. To address this issue we have analyzed the susceptibility to limited proteolysis and to alkylation of cysteine residues of mitochondrial aspartate aminotransferase (mAAT) bound to GroEL. Several regions of the N-terminal portion of GroEL-bound mAAT are highly susceptible to proteolysis, whereas a large core of about 200 residues containing the C-terminal half of the polypeptide chain is protected in the complex. This protection does not extend to the mAAT sulfhydryl groups which in the GroEL-mAAT complex have similar reactivity as in fully unfolded mAAT. These results suggest that the mAAT species bound to GroEL represent folding intermediates with a conformation that is substantially more disorganized than that of the native state. The N-terminal half of the molecule is more flexible and lies exposed at the mouth of the central cavity of GroEL. The more compact C-terminal section of mAAT, which contains residues located at the subunit interface in the native dimer, appears to be hidden in the central cavity of GroEL. Thus, the bulk of the interactions in the GroEL.mAAT complex seems to involve residues from the more compact C-terminal section of the substrate.

Divalent cations can induce the exposure of GroEL hydrophobic surfaces and strengthen GroEL hydrophobic binding interactions. Novel effects of Zn2+ GroEL interactions

Fluorescent and non-fluorescent probes have been used to show that divalent cations (Ca2+, Mg2+, Mn2+, and Zn2+) significantly increase hydrophobic exposure on GroEL, whereas monovalent cations (K+ and Na+) have little effect. Zn2+ always induced the largest amount of hydrophobic exposure on GroEL. By using a new method based on interactions of GroEL with octyl-Sepharose, it was demonstrated that Zn2+ binding strengthens GroEL hydrophobic binding interactions and increases the efficiency of substrate release upon the addition of MgATP and GroES. The binding of 4, 4'-bis(1-anilino-8-naphthalenesulfonic acid) to GroEL in the presence of Zn2+ has a Kd congruent with 1 microM, which is similar to that observed previously for the GroEL 4, 4'-bis(1-anilino-8-naphthalenesulfonic acid) complex. Urea denaturation, sedimentation velocity ultracentrifugation, and electron microscopy revealed that the quaternary structure of GroEL in the presence of Zn2+ had a stability and morphology equivalent to unliganded GroEL. In contrast, circular dichroism suggested some loss in both alpha-helical and beta-sheet secondary structure in the presence of Zn2+. These data suggest that divalent cations can modulate the amount of hydrophobic surface presented by GroEL. Furthermore, the influence of Zn2+ on GroEL hydrophobic surface exposure as well as substrate binding and release appears to be distinct from the stabilizing effects of Mg2+ on GroEL quaternary structure.

ATP-enhanced molecular chaperone functions of the small heat shock protein human alphaB crystallin

We report direct experimental evidence that human alphaB-crystallin, a member of the small heat shock protein family, actively participates in the refolding of citrate synthase (CS) in vitro. In the presence of 3.5 mM ATP, CS reactivation by alphaB-crystallin was enhanced approximately twofold. Similarly, 3.5 mM ATP enhanced the chaperone activity of alphaB-crystallin on the unfolding and aggregation of CS at 45 degrees C. Consistent with these findings, cell viability at 50 degrees C was improved nearly five orders of magnitude in Escherichia coli expressing alphaB-crystallin. SDS/PAGE analysis of cell lysates suggested that alphaB-crystallin protects cells against physiological stress in vivo by maintaining cytosolic proteins in their native and functional conformations. This report confirms the action of alphaB-crystallin as a molecular chaperone both in vitro and in vivo and describes the enhancement of alphaB-crystallin chaperone functions by ATP.

Protein folding in the cytosol: chaperonin-dependent and -independent mechanisms

Recent findings suggest that a combination of chaperonin-assisted and unassisted mechanisms operate in protein folding in the cytosol. While nascent chain-binding chaperones, such as Hsp70, could have a general role in maintaining the folding competence of translating polypeptide chains, the contribution of the cylindrical chaperonin complexes to overall folding is limited to a subset of aggregation-sensitive polypeptides. The majority of bacterial proteins are relatively small and they are synthesized rapidly and folded independently of the chaperonin GroEL in a posttranslational manner. Eukaryotes have a proportionally larger number of multi-domain proteins than bacteria. The individual domains of these proteins can be folded cotranslationally and sequentially. The use of this mechanism explains how large proteins fold independently of a chaperonin and could have been crucial in the evolution of a wide array of modular polypeptides in eukaryotes.

Structural aspects of GroEL function

The chaperonin GroEL and its cofactor GroES facilitate protein folding in an ATP-regulated manner. The recently solved crystal structure of the GroEL.GroES.(ADP)7 complex shows that the lining of the cavity in the polypeptide acceptor state is hydrophobic, whereas in the protein-release state it becomes hydrophilic. Other highlights of the past year include the visualization of the allosteric states of GroEL with respect to ATP using cryo-electron microscopy, and an X-ray crystallographic analysis of the interaction between the apical domain of GroEL and a peptide.

Two conformational states of beta-lactamase bound to GroEL: a biophysical characterization

Escherichia coli RTEM beta-lactamase, in which both cysteine residues which form the single disulfide bond have been mutated to alanine residues, can form stable reversible complexes with GroEL under two different sets of conditions. Starting with the GdmCl-denatured enzyme, it is bound to GroEL in a state where no protons are protected against exchange with 2H2O, as determined by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS). In contrast, when native protein is destabilized at high temperature and added to GroEL, a conformation is bound with 18 protected protons after two hours of exchange. While the high-temperature complex can form both with the wild-type enzyme (with intact disulfide bond) and the Cys-Ala double mutant, only the latter protein can form a complex starting from GdmCl denatured states. Thus, two different sets of conformations of the same protein can be bound, depending both on the conditions used to form the complex and on the intrinsic stability of the intermediate recognized by GroEL, and we have characterized the properties of both complexes.

Structural and mechanistic consequences of polypeptide binding by GroEL

The remarkable ability of the chaperonin GroEL to recognise a diverse range of non-native states of proteins constitutes one of the most fascinating molecular recognition events in protein chemistry. Recent structural studies have revealed a possible model for substrate binding by GroEL and a high-resolution image of the GroEL-GroES folding machinery has provided important new insights into our understanding of the mechanism of action of this chaperonin. Studies with a variety of model substrates reveal that the binding of substrate proteins to GroEL is not just a passive event, but can result in significant changes in the structure and stability of the bound polypeptide. The potential impact of this on the mechanism of chaperonin-assisted folding is not fully understood, but provides exciting scope for further experiment.

Structural changes of the Escherichia coli GroEL-GroES chaperonins upon complex formation in solution: a neutron small angle scattering study

We applied neutron scattering in conjunction with deuterium (D-) labeling in order to obtain information about the domain structure of GroEL and GroES isolated and in the complex. Each subunit of the heptameric GroES consists of two domains, a core domain (Met1 to Lys15 and Lys34 to Ala97) and an intervening loop region (Glu16 to Ala33). Neutron scattering shows that both regions change their conformation upon GroEL/GroES complex formation. The interdomain angle between the core regions of the heptameric GroES increases from 120 to 140 degrees, leading to a less dome-like shape of GroES, and the loop regions turn inwards by 75 degrees. The 23 C-terminal amino acids of the 14 GroEL subunits (Lys526 to Met548), which are unresolved in the crystal structure, are located either at the bottom of the cavity formed by the seven-membered GroEL ring or at the inner wall of the cavity. Upon complex formation the apical domains of GroEL move outwards, which facilitates binding of GroES at a Gro-EL-GroES center-to-center distance of (87 +/- 8) A. These structural changes may be important for the dissociation of the unfolded protein bound to the central cavity upon GroES binding. The overall structure determined by neutron scattering in solution tallies with the crystallographic model published after completion of this study. Differences in the conformation of GroES observed in the complex by the two methods support the view that the chaperonin complex is a flexible molecule which might switch in solution between different conformations.

Calorimetric observation of a GroEL-protein binding reaction with little contribution of hydrophobic interaction

Binding of Escherichia coli chaperonin, GroEL, to substrate proteins with non-native structure, reduced alpha-lactalbumin (rLA) and denatured pepsin, were analyzed by isothermal titration calorimetry at various temperatures in the presence of salt (0.2 M KCl). Both proteins bound to GroEL with 1:1 stoichiometry and micromolar affinity at all temperatures tested. However, thermodynamic properties of their binding to GroEL are remarkably different from each other. While heat capacity changes (DeltaCp) of rLA-GroEL binding showed large negative values, -4.19 kJ mol-1 K-1, that of denatured pepsin-GroEL binding was only -0.2 kJ mol-1 K-1. These values strongly indicate that the hydrophobic interaction is a major force of rLA-GroEL binding but not so for denatured pepsin-GroEL binding. When salt was omitted from the solution, the affinity and DeltaCp of the rLA-GroEL binding reaction were not significantly changed whereas denatured pepsin lost affinity to GroEL. Thus, in the non-native protein-GroEL binding reaction, thermodynamic properties, as well as the effect of salt, differ from protein to protein and hydrophobic interaction may not always be a major driving force.

Structure of the substrate binding domain of the thermosome, an archaeal group II chaperonin

The crystal structure of the substrate binding domain of the thermosome, the archaeal group II chaperonin, has been determined at 2.3 A resolution. The core resembles the apical domain of GroEL but lacks the hydrophobic residues implied in binding of substrates to group I chaperonins. Rather, a large hydrophobic surface patch is found in a novel helix-turn-helix motif, which is characteristic of all group II chaperonins including the eukaryotic TRiC/CCT complex. Models of the holochaperonin, which are consistent with cryo electron microscopy data, suggest a dual role of this helical protrusion in substrate binding and controlling access to the central cavity independent of a GroES-like cochaperonin.

La cage aux fold: asymmetry in the crystal structure of GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7

The structure of the molecular chaperone GroEL from Escherichia coli in complex with GroES and seven ADP molecules has recently been reported to 3 A resolution. The structure illustrates how the cavity of GroEL is converted from a hydrophobic environment, suitable for binding unfolded polypeptides, to a much larger hydrophilic environment suitable for refolding proteins.

Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL

The chaperonin GroEL is a double-ring structure with a central cavity in each ring that provides an environment for the efficient folding of proteins when capped by the co-chaperone GroES in the presence of adenine nucleotides. Productive folding of the substrate rhodanese has been observed in cis ternary complexes, where GroES and polypeptide are bound to the same ring, formed with either ATP, ADP or non-hydrolysable ATP analogues, suggesting that the specific requirement for ATP is confined to an action in the trans ring that evicts GroES and polypeptide from the cis side. We show here, however, that for the folding of malate dehydrogenase and Rubisco there is also an absolute requirement for ATP in the cis ring, as ADP and AMP-PNP are unable to promote folding. We investigated the specific roles of binding and hydrolysis of ATP in the cis and trans rings using mutant forms of GroEL that bind ATP but are defective in its hydrolysis. Binding of ATP and GroES in cis initiated productive folding inside a highly stable GroEL-ATP-GroES complex. To discharge GroES and polypeptide, ATP hydrolysis in the cis ring was required to form a GroEL-ADP-GroES complex with decreased stability, priming the cis complex for release by ATP binding (without hydrolysis) in the trans ring. These observations offer an explanation of why GroEL functions as a double-ring complex.