Entecavir versus lamivudine for patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B

Antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis B

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B remains a clinical challenge. Long-term viral suppression is a major goal of antiviral therapy to improve the clinical outcome of the patients. Antiviral treatment of chronic hepatitis B relies currently on immune modulators such as interferon alpha and its pegylated form, and viral polymerase inhibitors. Because of the slow kinetics of viral clearance and the spontaneous viral genome variability, viral mutants resistant to nucleoside analogs may be selected. However, the development of new antiviral agents is rapidly improving the offing of therapy of chronic hepatitis B. These new therapeutic advances are reviewed in this manuscript.

Entecavir versus lamivudine for patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Entecavir is a potent and selective antiviral agent that has demonstrated efficacy in phase 2 studies in patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B.

METHODS

In this phase 3, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 648 patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B who had not previously been treated with a nucleoside analogue to receive 0.5 mg of entecavir or 100 mg of lamivudine once daily for a minimum of 52 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was histologic improvement (a decrease by at least two points in the Knodell necroinflammatory score, without worsening of fibrosis).

RESULTS

Histologic improvement after 48 weeks of treatment occurred in 208 of 296 patients in the entecavir group who had adequate baseline liver-biopsy specimens that could be evaluated (70 percent), as compared with 174 of 287 such patients in the lamivudine group (61 percent, P=0.01). More patients in the entecavir group than in the lamivudine group had undetectable serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels according to a polymerase-chain-reaction assay (90 percent vs. 72 percent, P<0.001) and normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels (78 percent vs. 71 percent, P=0.045). The mean reduction in serum HBV DNA levels from baseline to week 48 was greater with entecavir than with lamivudine (5.0 vs. 4.5 log [on a base-10 scale] copies per milliliter, P<0.001). There was no evidence of resistance to entecavir. Safety and adverse-event profiles were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B who had not previously been treated with a nucleoside analogue, the rates of histologic improvement, virologic response, and normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels were significantly higher at 48 weeks with entecavir than with lamivudine. The safety profile of the two agents was similar, and there was no evidence of viral resistance to entecavir. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00035789.).

One-year entecavir or lamivudine therapy results in reduction of hepatitis B virus intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA levels

Entecavir and lamivudine are potent nucleoside analogues that can suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication. However, the effects of these two antiviral agents on intrahepatic total HBV DNA and covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) are not known. In this study, we aimed to assess the effect of 48 weeks of entecavir/lamivudine therapy on intrahepatic total HBV DNA and cccDNA levels. Forty chronic hepatitis B patients, participating in two Phase III entecavir trials at our centre, were randomized to receive 48 weeks of either 0.5 mg once daily of entecavir (n = 21) or 100 mg once daily of lamivudine (n = 19). Their serological, virological and biochemical responses, as well as intrahepatic HBV DNA levels were monitored. There was no significant difference between entecavir and lamivudine therapy in terms of post-treatment serological, virological and biochemical responses. Both nucleoside analogues reduced serum viral load, intrahepatic total HBV DNA, and cccDNA by about 4.8 logs, 2 logs, and 1 log respectively. An increase in the proportion of intrahepatic HBV DNA in the form of cccDNA was seen after 48 weeks of therapy. In conclusion, both entecavir and lamivudine can successfully reduce intrahepatic HBV DNA and cccDNA. CccDNA becomes the dominant form of HBV DNA during viral suppression and is possibly responsible for viral rebound after short-term antiviral therapy.