Atypical antipsychotics and parkinsonism

Application of the Antipsychotic Use in Dementia Assessment audit tool to facilitate appropriate antipsychotic use in long term care residents with dementia

Approximately 25% of all nursing home residents take antipsychotics for behavioral disturbances, despite limited efficacy and warnings against their use. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to test the utility of an educational in-service to facilitate the appropriate use of antipsychotics for nursing home residents with dementia. A single group pre/post design targeting the reduction of antipsychotic medications in older adults was guided by Rogers' Diffusion of Innovations theory. Descriptive analyses were done to evaluate antipsychotic use and supporting documentation at baseline and 2 months following an educational intervention that focused on appropriate antipsychotic use, documentation requirements and non-pharmacologic interventions. The prescribing rate for antipsychotics showed a reduction from 20.3% to 15.4% and nursing documentation of non-pharmacological interventions increased from 16.7% to 75%. Assuring appropriate use of antipsychotics is currently mandated and is consistent with high quality, person centered care. This simple, yet individualized educational intervention and assessment can serve as a model for use in other long term care facilities.

Pharmacological recommendations for the symptomatic treatment of dementia: the Canadian Consensus Conference on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Dementia 2012

BACKGROUND

While there have been no new medications approved for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) or other dementias in Canada since 2004, the Canadian Consensus Conference on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Dementia (CCCDTD) reviewed and updated the clinical practice guidelines on the pharmacological management of dementia that were published previously.

METHODS

This review focused on the literature for the pharmacological treatment of dementia based on studies published since the third CCCDTD in 2006. A literature search of English-language medical databases was preformed for studies pertaining to the pharmacological treatment of AD and other dementias that examined the management of cognitive and functional impairment, as well as neuropsychiatric symptoms. All previous recommendations were reviewed, and only those that required updating based on new published studies were revised. Several new recommendations were also added. Recommendations were rated for quality of evidence and were approved by consensus.

RESULTS

There were 15 revised or new recommendations approved by consensus. The revised recommendations included acknowledging that cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) possess a class effect and any of the agents can be used for AD across the spectrum of severity and with co-existing cerebrovascular disease. There was insufficient evidence to recommend for or against the use of ChEIs in combination with memantine for the primary indication of treating neuropsychiatric symptoms, or for the treatment of vascular dementia. Recommendations for the discontinuation of cognitive enhancers were revised and clarified, as well as the risks associated with discontinuing these drugs. ChEIs were recommended as a treatment option for dementia with Parkinson's disease. Risks associated with use of antipsychotics for neuropsychiatric symptoms were strengthened, and guidelines regarding the use of antidepressants for affective disturbances in dementia were weakened, and are now considered an option but not a firm recommendation. Valproate was recommended not to be used, and there was insufficient evidence to recommend for or against the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or trazodone for the treatment of agitation and aggression.

CONCLUSION

In spite of the lack of new therapeutic agents for the treatment of dementia, recent studies have helped to clarify and strengthen recommendations to optimize the pharmacological management of these illnesses.

Polypharmacy in the HIV-infected older adult population

The prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection among people older than 50 years is increasing. Older HIV-infected patients are particularly at risk for polypharmacy because they often have multiple comorbidities that require pharmacotherapy. Overall, there is not much known with respect to both the impact of aging on medication use in HIV-infected individuals, and the potential for interactions with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and coadministered medications and its clinical consequences. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of polypharmacy with a focus on its impact on the HIV-infected older adult population and to also provide some clinical considerations in this high-risk population.

Movement disorders in elderly users of risperidone and first generation antipsychotic agents: a Canadian population-based study

Background

Despite concerns over the potential for severe adverse events, antipsychotic medications remain the mainstay of treatment of behaviour disorders and psychosis in elderly patients. Second-generation antipsychotic agents (SGAs; e.g., risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine) have generally shown a better safety profile compared to the first-generation agents (FGAs; e.g., haloperidol and phenothiazines), particularly in terms of a lower potential for involuntary movement disorders. Risperidone, the only SGA with an official indication for the management of inappropriate behaviour in dementia, has emerged as the antipsychotic most commonly prescribed to older patients. Most clinical trials evaluating the risk of movement disorders in elderly patients receiving antipsychotic therapy have been of limited sample size and/or of relatively short duration. A few observational studies have produced inconsistent results.

Methods

A population-based retrospective cohort study of all residents of the Canadian province of Manitoba aged 65 and over, who were dispensed antipsychotic medications for the first time during the time period from April 1, 2000 to March 31, 2007, was conducted using Manitoba's Department of Health's administrative databases. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the risk of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) in new users of risperidone compared to new users of FGAs.

Results

After controlling for potential confounders (demographics, comorbidity and medication use), risperidone use was associated with a lower risk of EPS compared to FGAs at 30, 60, 90 and 180 days (adjusted hazard ratios [HR] 0.38, 95% CI: 0.22–0.67; 0.45, 95% CI: 0.28–0.73; 0.50, 95% CI: 0.33–0.77; 0.65, 95% CI: 0.45–0.94, respectively). At 360 days, the strength of the association weakened with an adjusted HR of 0.75, 95% CI: 0.54–1.05.

Conclusions

In a large population of elderly patients the use of risperidone was associated with a lower risk of EPS compared to FGAs.

Drug-induced parkinsonism

INTRODUCTION

Drug-induced parkinsonism (DIP) is the second most common cause of parkinsonism after idiopathic Parkinson's disease (iPD). Initially reported as a complication of antipsychotics, it was later recognized as a common complication of antidepressants, calcium channel antagonists, gastrointestinal prokinetics, antiepileptic drugs and many other compounds. Despite being a major health problem in certain populations, it seems to be frequently overlooked by the medical community.

AREAS COVERED

This paper approaches the concept of DIP, reviews its epidemiology, clinical features and ancillary tests recommended for a correct diagnosis. The authors discuss the different drugs and its pathogenic mechanisms. The relevance of an early recognition and recommendations for a correct management are commented.

EXPERT OPINION

Prescribers need to remain vigilant for DIP, particularly in the elderly, patients taking multiple drugs and those with genetic risk factors involved in iPD. Cessation of the causing agent is the main treatment and there is no evidence of benefit for the use of anticholinergics or levodopa. If the medication cannot be withdrawn, it should be switched to agents with a lower risk of DIP.

Non-neurological and metabolic side effects in the Cost Utility of the Latest Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia Randomised Controlled Trial (CUtLASS-1)

The impact of non-neurological and metabolic side effects (NNSEs) on the prescription of antipsychotics in real clinical practice remains unclear. We conducted an intention-to-treat, secondary analysis of data from a randomised, controlled trial (CUtLASS-1; n=227) to examine NNSEs emergent at 12 weeks and 52 weeks. A clinically significant difference was defined as double or half the symptoms in groups prescribed first- versus second-generation antipsychotics, represented by odds ratios greater than 2.0 (indicating advantage for first-generation drugs) or less than 0.5 (indicating advantage for the newer drugs). There were no differences between the treatment groups at baseline. At both 12 and 52 weeks follow-up, patients on second-generation drugs were more likely than their first-generation counterparts to experience cardiovascular problems and anticholinergic side effects, as well as increased sexual side effects in men. Objective weight gain was equivalent between the two groups at 12 weeks, but by one year fewer patients in the second-generation arm experienced weight gain and there was no significant difference with regard to percent change in BMI. These results suggest that there may be clinically significant increases in anticholinergic, cardiovascular, and sexual side effects for patients on second-generation drugs. The expected increased weight gain in the second-generation arm did not occur. This study provides evidence that clinicians should take a more nuanced approach toward expert antipsychotic prescription, rather than viewing the drugs as distinct classes.

Older men with dementia are at greater risk than women of serious events after initiating antipsychotic therapy

OBJECTIVES

To understand how drug therapy differently affects older women and men.

DESIGN

Population-based, retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Ontario, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-one thousand five hundred twenty-six older adults (13,760 women, 7,766 men) with dementia newly started on oral atypical antipsychotic therapy between April 1, 2007, and March 1, 2010.

MEASUREMENTS

Numbers and rates of serious events. Serious events were defined as a hospital admission or death within 30 days of treatment initiation. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios of women and men were compared in the full cohort and in strata based on setting of care, age, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and antipsychotic dose.

RESULTS

Of 21,526 older adults with a median age of 84, 1,889 (8.8%) had a serious event (1,044 women, 7.6%; 845 men, 10.9%). Of these, 363 women (2.6%) and 355 men (4.6%) died. Men were more likely than women to be hospitalized or die during the 30-day follow-up period (adjusted odds ratio = 1.47, 95% confidence interval = 1.33-1.62) and consistently more likely to experience a serious event in each stratum. A gradient of risk according to drug dose was found for the development of a serious event in women and men.

CONCLUSION

The risk of developing a serious event shortly after the initiation of antipsychotic therapy was high in women and men with dementia but was consistently higher in older men. This pattern remained the same in strata based on setting of care, age, CCI, and antipsychotic dose.

Use of antipsychotics among older residents in VA nursing homes

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic medications are commonly prescribed to nursing home residents despite their well-established adverse event profiles. Because little is known about their use in Veterans Affairs (VA) nursing homes [ie, Community Living Centers (CLCs)], we assessed the prevalence and risk factors for antipsychotic use in older residents of VA CLCs.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 3692 Veterans age 65 or older who were admitted between January 2004 and June 2005 to one of 133 VA CLCs and had a stay of ≥90 days. We used VA Pharmacy Benefits Management data to examine antipsychotic use and VA Medical SAS datasets and the Minimum Data Set to identify evidence-based indications for antipsychotic use (eg, schizophrenia, dementia with psychosis). We used multivariable logistic regression and generalized estimating equations to identify factors independently associated with antipsychotic receipt.

RESULTS

Overall, 948/3692(25.7%) residents received an antipsychotic, of which 59.3% had an evidence-based indication for use. Residents with aggressive behavior [odds ratio (OR)=2.74, 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.04-3.67] and polypharmacy (9+ drugs; OR=1.84, 95% CI, 1.41-2.40) were more likely to receive antipsychotics, as were users of antidepressants (OR=1.37, 95% CI, 1.14-1.66), anxiolytic/hypnotics (OR=2.30, 95% CI, 1.64-3.23), or drugs for dementia (OR=1.52, 95% CI, 1.21-1.92). Those residing in Alzheimer/dementia special care units were also more likely to receive an antipsychotic (OR=1.66, 95% CI, 1.26-2.21). Veterans with dementia but no documented psychosis were as likely as those with an evidence-based indication to receive an antipsychotic (OR=1.10, 95% CI, 0.82-1.47).

CONCLUSIONS

Antipsychotic use is common among VA nursing home residents aged 65 and older, including those without a documented evidence-based indication for use. Further quality improvement efforts are needed to reduce potentially inappropriate antipsychotic prescribing.

Psychosocial interventions for reducing antipsychotic medication in care home residents

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic medication is regularly prescribed in care homes to control 'behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia' despite moderate efficacy, significant adverse effects, and available non-pharmacological alternatives.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions to reduce antipsychotic medication in care home residents.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group's Specialized Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, LILACS, a number of trial registers and grey literature sources were searched on 19th December 2011.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Individual or cluster-randomised controlled trials comparing a psychosocial intervention aimed at reducing antipsychotic medication with usual care in care home residents or comparing two different approaches.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed the retrieved articles for relevance and methodological quality and extracted data. Critical appraisal of studies addressed risk of bias through selection bias, performance bias, attrition bias, and detection bias, as well as criteria related to cluster design. Authors of relevant studies were contacted for additional information.Owing to clinical heterogeneity of interventions, statistical heterogeneity was not assessed and no meta-analysis performed. Study results are presented in a narrative form.

MAIN RESULTS

Four cluster-randomised controlled studies met the inclusion criteria. All of them investigated complex interventions comprising educational approaches. Three studies offered education and training for nursing staff, one study offered multidisciplinary team meetings as main component of the intervention. There was one high-quality study, but overall the methodological quality of studies was moderate. The studies revealed consistent results for the primary end point. All studies documented a decrease of the proportion of residents with antipsychotic drug use or a reduction in days with antipsychotic use per 100 days per resident, respectively. In summary, the reviewed evidence on psychosocial interventions targeting professionals is consistent with a reduction of antipsychotic medication prescription in care home residents. However, owing to heterogeneous approaches, summary effect sizes cannot be determined.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence to support the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for reducing antipsychotic medication in care home residents. However, the review was based on a small number of heterogeneous studies with important methodological shortcomings. The most recent and methodologically most rigorous study showed the most pronounced effect.

Second-generation antipsychotics: reviewing the cost-effectiveness component of the CATIE trial

The cost-effectiveness component of the 18-month CATIE trial of schizophrenia pharmacotherapy (n = 1460) showed that the first-generation antipsychotic perphenazine was US$300-600 per month less expensive than each of four second-generation antipsychotics, and no less effective across multiple measures. We consider whether or not each of eight potential methodological limitations could weaken this conclusion: follow-up rates, study duration, sample characteristics, the choice of outcome measures, exclusion of patients with tardive dyskinesia from assignment to perphenazine, choice of study drugs and doses, reliance on intention-to-treat analysis, and differences in prestudy treatment. We conclude that results of CATIE are robust to these limitations. Perphenazine seems to have been a more representative choice for first-generation antipsychotic comparison treatment than haloperidol.

Atypical antipsychotic use in patients with dementia: managing safety concerns

Neuropsychiatric symptoms such as agitation and delusions occur commonly in elderly patients with dementia and often cause significant distress. Data on treatment efficacy are strongest for atypical antipsychotics, but these agents must be used with great caution. Adverse effects in patients with dementia include an increased risk of mortality and cerebrovascular events, as well as metabolic effects, extrapyramidal symptoms, falls, cognitive worsening, cardiac arrhythmia, and pneumonia. Conventional antipsychotics may pose an even greater safety risk. No clear efficacy evidence exists to support the use of alternative psychotropic classes (e.g., antidepressants, anticonvulsants), although they may be safer options. An antipsychotic trial is warranted when nonpharmacological intervention is unsuccessful and neuropsychiatric symptoms or associated behaviors cause severe distress or pose a significant safety risk. Before an atypical antipsychotic is started, a comprehensive assessment should be performed to rule out medical causes of the neuropsychiatric symptoms and to ascertain whether any contributing environmental or caregiver factors are present. Risks, benefits, and alternatives should be discussed with the patient and surrogate decision maker, with an opportunity given to ask questions. Dosages should be the lowest necessary, and metabolic parameters should be regularly monitored. Face-to-face visits are important to monitor response, tolerance, and the need for continued treatment. For patients in whom neuropsychiatric symptoms have been much improved or have been in remission for 3-6 months, a discontinuation trial should be considered. Through careful selection of appropriate patients for treatment, education of patients and caregivers, and close monitoring, safety risks can be minimized.

The use of antipsychotics in a medium-long stay psychiatric hospital from 1998 to 2010

OBJECTIVE

Atypical agents have emerged as the dominant choice among antipsychotics. Data about development of antipsychotic use in medium-long stay psychiatric hospitals is lacking.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Antipsychotic drug consumption data and cost was obtained from 1998 to 2010 for all inpatients of a 231-bed psychiatric hospital. Number of hospital stays was obtained from the hospital admission unit. Daily defined dose (DDD) values were those assigned by the WHO. Antipsychotic use was also measured using recently available consensus-based recommendations. Antipsychotic use was then calculated as the sum of individual DDD or total equivalent doses of all antipsychotics divided by the annual stay number.

RESULTS

Antipsychotic use increased 135% from 1998 to 2010 when measured in DDDs or 108% when measured with the consensus-based recommendations. Antipsychotic expenditure has risen six-fold since 1998. This augmentation is due to the increase of use of atypical antipsychotics.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, antipsychotic use has at least doubled in the last 13 years. This growth, attributable to an increase in atypical drug use, has contributed to a six-fold increase in the total antipsychotic expenditure. Whether this prescription pattern has translated into palpable clinical benefits remains unclear.

Comparing three screening tools for drug-induced parkinsonism in patients with advanced schizophrenia: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced parkinsonism (DIP) is seen in one third of patients exposed to antipsychotic drugs and may lead to complications related to dysphagia and falls. Aside from skilled neurological examination, no tool has been validated to facilitate detection and follow-up.

OBJECTIVE

In this pilot study, three validated screening instruments were tested in an age-biased cohort of schizophrenia patients, including four items of the Liverpool University Neuroleptic Side-Effects Rating Scale (LUNSERS) and two brief questionnaires designed for community survey of parkinsonism.

METHOD

Fifty-six subjects living with chronic schizophrenia between 50 and 75 years of age underwent a motor evaluation along the original Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-section III and answered questions along the selected screening instruments, and results compared to those of 16 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and 15 neurologically unimpaired volunteers. Odds ratios, sensitivity, specificity, and their 95% confidence intervals, were calculated.

RESULTS

All three screening instruments correctly identified the PD state and distinguished PD from healthy participants. Eighteen (32%) schizophrenic patients displayed objective motor signs of parkinsonism. A single item of the LUNSERS (shakiness) significantly distinguished DIP from DIP-free patients, with a sensitivity of 61.1% and a specificity of 83.3%. The positive predictive value was 63.5% and the negative predictive value was 81.9%. The two other screening methods showed insufficient predictive value.

CONCLUSION

Apart from a single query on shakiness, none of the tools examined were adequate to screen for DIP in patients treated for schizophrenia. A different instrument is necessary to monitor this important adverse effect in schizophrenia.

Alteration in RGS2 expression level is associated with changes in haloperidol induced extrapyramidal features in a mutant mouse model

Antipsychotic induced Parkinsonism (AIP) is a common adverse effect of antipsychotic drug treatment among schizophrenia patients. Two previous studies showed association of the rs4606 SNP in the 3' untranslated region of the regulator of G protein signaling 2 gene (RGS2) with susceptibility to AIP. Since rs4606 reportedly influences expression of RGS2, we applied a translational approach and studied the effect of chronic (24 days) exposure to haloperidol on AIP-like features in mice carrying a mutation that causes lower Rgs2 gene expression. Haloperidol and vehicle treated male mice heterozygous (HET) or homozygous (HOM) for the mutation, or wild type (WT), were evaluated for open field locomotion, catalepsy duration, pole test performance and rota-rod latency to fall. We showed that in haloperidol treated mice lower Rgs2 expression is associated with better performance on the open field, catalepsy and rota-rod tests but not the pole test. Results were most consistent for the 0.2 mg/kg/d haloperidol dose. These observations support the possible involvement of RGS2 in mechanisms underlying susceptibility to AIP.

Olanzapine: palliative medicine update

Olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic agent of the thienobenzodiazepine class. Olanzapine blocks multiple neurotransmitter receptors, including dopaminergic (D(1), D(2), D(3), and D(4)), serotonergic (5-hydroxytryptamine 2A [5-HT(2A)], 5-HT(2C), 5-HT(3), and 5-HT(6)), adrenergic (α(1)), histaminic (H(1)), and muscarinic (M(1), M(2), M(3), and M(4)) receptors. Olanzapine has a high affinity for the 5HT(2A) receptor, which is up to 5 times greater than the dopamine receptor, resulting in less propensity to the development of extrapyramidal side effects. The affinity of olanzapine for multiple receptors has lead to the identification of olanzapine as an important agent in the treatment of delirium, nausea, and vomiting. Olanzapine has been demonstrated to have opioid-sparing properties. Olanzapine is principally metabolized by glucuronidation, with a smaller metabolic contribution from the cytochrome oxidase system. Adverse effects of olanzapine include somnolence, postural hypotension, constipation, dizziness, restlessness, and weight gain. The purpose of this article is to outline the pharmacodynamics, pharmacology, and evidence for the use of olanzapine in palliative care.

A long-term care center interdisciplinary education program for antipsychotic use in dementia: program update five years later

BACKGROUND

While antipsychotic (AP) medications are frequently used in long-term care, current evidence suggests that the risks may offset the benefits, necessitating periodic reassessment of their use. The aims of this present study were: (1) to assess rates of AP use five years after our first intervention to determine the long-term impact; and (2) to implement an updated AP reduction educational intervention program at the same center five years later in order to determine whether AP use could be further reduced.

METHODS

Participants were residents with dementia receiving AP medication. The educational program component included separate lectures on pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatment of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). Completion of the Nursing Home Behavior Problems Scale (NHBPS), physician interviews concerning AP treatment plans for subjects with dementia, and AP administration and dose assessment occurred both at baseline and again between four to five months after the educational program.

RESULTS

Of 308 long-term residents with dementia, 53 (17.2%) were receiving regular APs, primarily for agitation, aggressivity, other behavioral problems and psychosis. Of these, six died and one was transferred, leaving 46 participants. At five months, ten (21.7%) residents were no longer receiving APs and seven (15.2%) were on a lower dose; thus, 17 (37.0%) were either discontinued or on a lower dose. There was no worsening of NHBPS scores.

CONCLUSION

Despite the low prevalence (17.2%) of AP users at the beginning of the current study compared to that observed five years prior (30.5%), it is still possible to further decrease the proportion of users.

Association of the ZFPM2 gene with antipsychotic-induced parkinsonism in schizophrenia patients

RATIONALE

Antipsychotic-induced parkinsonism (AIP) is a severe adverse affect of antipsychotic drug treatment. Recently, our group performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) for AIP severity, and identified several potential AIP risk variants.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to validate our original AIP-GWAS susceptibility variants and to understand their possible function.

METHODS

We conducted a validation study of 15 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in an independent sample of 178 US schizophrenia patients treated for at least a month with typical or atypical antipsychotics. Then, a sample of 49 Jewish Israeli Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with available neuroimaging ([(123)I]-FP-CIT-SPECT) data was analyzed, to study association of confirmed AIP SNPs with level of dopaminergic deficits in the putamen.

RESULTS

Using logistic regression and controlling for possible confounders, we found nominal association of the intronic SNP, rs12678719, in the Zinc Finger Protein Multitype 2 (ZFPM2) gene with AIP (62 affected/116 unaffected), in the whole sample (p = 0.009; P = 5.97 × 10(-5) in the GWAS), and in the African American sub-sample (N = 111; p = 0.002). The same rs12678719-G AIP susceptibility allele was associated with lower levels of dopaminergic neuron related ligand binding in the contralateral putamen of PD patients (p = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary findings support association of the ZFPM2 SNP, rs12678719, with AIP. At the functional level, this variant is associated with deficits in the nigrostriatal pathway in PD patients that may be related to latent subclinical deficits among AIP-prone individuals with schizophrenia. Further validation studies in additional populations are required.

Pharmacological and nonpharmacological management of delirium in critically ill patients

Delirium is a common yet under-diagnosed syndrome of acute brain dysfunction, which is characterized by inattention, fluctuating mental status, altered level of consciousness, or disorganized thinking. Although our recognition of risk factors for delirium has progressed, our understanding of the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms remains limited. Improvements in monitoring and assessment for delirium (particularly in the intensive care setting) have resulted in validated and reliable tools such as arousal scales and bedside delirium monitoring instruments. Once delirium is recognized and the modifiable risk factors are addressed, the next step in management (if delirium persists) is often pharmacological intervention. The sedatives, analgesics, and hypnotics most often used in the intensive care unit (ICU) to achieve patient comfort are all too frequently deliriogenic, resulting in a longer duration of ICU and hospital stay, and increased costs. Therefore, identification of safe and efficacious agents to reduce the incidence, duration, and severity of ICU delirium is a hot topic in critical care. Recognizing that there are no medications approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the prevention or treatment of delirium, we chose anti-psychotics and alpha-2 agonists as the general pharmacological focus of this article because both were subjects of relatively recent data and ongoing clinical trials. Emerging pharmacological strategies for addressing delirium must be combined with nonpharmacological approaches (such as daily spontaneous awakening trials and spontaneous breathing trials) and early mobility (combined with the increasingly popular approach called: Awakening and Breathing Coordination, Delirium Monitoring, Early Mobility, and Exercise [ABCDE] of critical care) to develop evidence-based approaches that will ensure safer and faster recovery of the sickest patients in our healthcare system.

Prevalence of psychotropic medication use among German and Austrian nursing home residents: a comparison of 3 cohorts

BACKGROUND

Despite increasing knowledge about the limited effectiveness and severe adverse effects, the prescription rate of psychotropic medications in frail elderly persons remains high. Prescriptions are mainly made to control behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, although factors associated with prescriptions are rarely reported. However, such information is a prerequisite to develop intervention programs aiming to safely reduce psychotropic medication in nursing home residents.

METHODS

We report the comparison of cross-sectional data of psychotropic medication prescription rates from 3 large studies including nursing home residents in Germany and Austria. We aimed to compare the prevalence of (1) psychotropic medication, (2) different classes of psychotropic medication, (3) psychotropic medication administered for bedtime use, and (4) associations between prescription of psychotropics and institutional and residents' characteristics. Confidence intervals of prevalences and multiple logistic regression analyses were adjusted for cluster correlation.

RESULTS

Data from 5336 residents in 136 long term care facilities were included. In Austria, 74.6% (95% CI 72.0-77.2%) of all residents had a prescription of at least one psychotropic medication compared to Germany with about 51.8% (95% CI 48.3-55.2%) and 52.4% (95% CI 48.7-56.1%). Of all antipsychotics, 66% (Austria) and 47% (Germany) were prescribed for bedtime use. Most prescriptions were conventional, low-potency antipsychotics. In all 3 studies, there was no statistically significant association between psychotropic medication prescription and nursing home characteristics. On the level of residents, consistent positive associations were found for higher level of care dependency and permanent restlessness. Consistent negative associations were found for older age and male gender.

CONCLUSION

Frequency of psychotropic and especially antipsychotic medication is substantial in nursing home residents in Germany and Austria. The high number of prescriptions is likely to be an indicator for a perceived or actual lack of strategies to handle behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia.

Antipsychotics in Alzheimer's disease: A critical analysis

The estimated worldwide prevalence of dementia among adults older than 60 years of age was 3.9% in 2005. About 90% of demented patients will develop neuropsychiatric symptoms (NS) such as delirium, delusion, aggressiveness and agitation. The treatment of NS involves non-pharmacologic strategies (with varying degrees of success according to the scientific literature) and pharmacologic treatment (PT). The present review of literature examined the current role of AP in the management of NS in dementia.

METHODS

A thematic review of medical literature was carried out.

RESULTS

313 articles were found, 39 of which were selected for critical analysis. Until 2005, the best evidence for PT had supported the use of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs), anticholinesterases, memantine and antipsychotics (AP). In 2005, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) disapproved the use of atypical APs to treat neuropsychiatric symptoms in individuals with dementia (the same occurred with the typical APs in 2008). After this, at least two important randomized placebo-controlled multicenter trials were published examining the effectiveness of atypical APs in Alzheimer's disease (CATIE-AD) and the effects of interrupting AP treatment (DART-AD).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the current evidence available, APs still have a place in treatment of the more serious psychotic symptoms, after the failure of non-pharmacological treatment and of an initial approach with selective inhibitors of serotonin uptake, anticholinesterases and memantine.

Determinants of antipsychotic medication use among older people living in aged care homes in Australia

OBJECTIVE

To investigate determinants of antipsychotic medication use among older people living in aged care homes in Australia.

DESIGN

Retrospective study of a random sample of de-identified medication reports using cross-sectional data gathered between 1 January 2008 and 30 June 2008 in Australia.

SUBJECTS

The mean (SD) age of the residents was 84.0 (9.0) years. Seventy-five per cent were females.

MEASURES

Resident demographics, clinical characteristics, medical diagnoses and prescribed medication were systematically recorded. Logistic regression (LR) models were used to determine predictors for any antipsychotic, atypical and conventional antipsychotic use.

RESULTS

Twenty-three per cent of the residents were prescribed one or more antipsychotics. In the LR model, factors for predicting the odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) for any antipsychotic medication use were agitation (7.11, 95% CI 3.15-16.03), challenging behaviours (7.47, 95% CI 2.53-22.10), dementia (2.35, 95% CI 1.36-4.06), dementia with mood disorder (0.39, 95% CI 0.16-0.92), paranoia (6.70, 95% CI 1.08-41.55), psychosis (14.79, 95% CI 3.64-60.00) and any psychiatric diagnosis (3.30, 95% CI 1.82-6.00). Use of atypical antipsychotic medication was significant for agitation (4.58, 95% CI 2.05-10.23), aggression (2.25, 95% CI 1.05-4.78), challenging behaviours (8.01, 95% CI 2.76-23.24), dementia (3.64, 95% CI 1.99-6.67), dementia with mood disorder (0.16, 95% CI 0.06-0.43), psychosis (16.51, 95% CI 4.28-63.66) and any psychiatric diagnosis (4.44, 95% CI 2.33-8.46).

CONCLUSIONS

Psychiatric diagnosis, psychosis and dementia were associated with significantly greater odds for the use of antipsychotic medications. Older people suffering from dementia and comorbid mood disorders treated with antidepressants were less likely to be prescribed atypical antipsychotics.

Biases in medication prescribing: the case of second-generation antipsychotics

The shift from first-generation antipsychotic medications to second-generation antipsychotic medications initially caused a wave of excitement about the potential for improved and broader efficacy of these medications concurrent with an improved side-effect profile. Recent data from high-quality research analyses have subsequently raised significant questions about these claims. This research evidence has, however, not altered prescribing behavior in a way that would be expected from fully rational evaluation of the evidence. Prescribing decisions represent poorly understood, complex behaviors influenced by a number of external and internal forces, some of which may be elucidated by advances in social and cognitive psychology. In this article, the decision to prescribe first- versus second-generation antipsychotic medications is examined, and specific social psychological biases and individual cognitive biases are hypothesized to be significant influences on clinicians. These biases may perpetuate disparity between research evidence and clinical practice.

Genome-wide association study of antipsychotic-induced parkinsonism severity among schizophrenia patients

RATIONALE

Antipsychotic-induced parkinsonism (AIP) is a severe adverse affect of neuroleptic treatment. Interindividual heterogeneity in AIP development and severity is associated with risk factors such as antipsychotic drug type, old age, and female gender. There is evidence for genetic predisposition to develop AIP but the variants that confer susceptibility or protection are mostly unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To identify genes related to AIP susceptibility, we performed a pharmacogenomic genome-wide association study (GWAS) for AIP severity.

METHODS

Three hundred ninety-seven American schizophrenia patients who participated in the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE)-GWAS project were included in our analysis. Patients had been randomized to treatment with antipsychotic monotherapy for periods ranging from 2 weeks to 18 months during phase 1 of the CATIE trial. They were regularly assessed for AIP severity using the modified Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS). For statistical analysis, patients were dichotomized as cases (average SAS mean global score > 0.3 during CATIE phase 1, N = 199) or controls (average SAS mean global score 0, N = 198).

RESULTS

Using logistic regression and controlling for population stratification, age, gender, SAS score at baseline, and concomitant use of anticholinergic drugs, we identified several single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with AIP severity. Although none reached the GWAS significance level of P < 4.2 x 10(-7), some promising candidate genes for further research on genetic predisposition to AIP were identified including EPF1, NOVA1, and FIGN.

CONCLUSIONS

Our finding may contribute to understanding of the pathophysiology of AIP as well as to a priori identification of patients vulnerable for development of AIP.

Pharmacological management of psychosis in elderly patients with parkinsonism

Parkinsonism is a characteristic feature of Parkinson's disease and dementia with Lewy bodies and is commonly seen in Alzheimer's disease. Psychosis commonly appears during the course of these illnesses. Treatment of parkinsonism with antiparkinsonian medications constitutes an additional risk factor for the appearance or worsening of psychosis. Conversely, treatment of psychosis with antipsychotic drugs in patients with parkinsonism might worsen the underlying movement disorder, especially in the elderly. In this article, we review parkinsonian conditions in the elderly and offer guidelines to assess and manage comorbid psychosis. We focus on the pharmacologic management of psychosis with atypical antipsychotic medications and briefly review the role of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors.

Practical guidelines for the use of new generation antipsychotic drugs (except clozapine) in adult individuals with intellectual disabilities

New generation antipsychotic (NGA) drugs introduced to the US market after clozapine (aripiprazole, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone) are frequently used in individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID). However, there is very limited research to fully establish evidence-based or personalized medicine approaches for their use in this population. These guidelines take a pragmatic approach to establishing frameworks for their use by utilizing the prescribing information and reviewing the available literature on other relevant neuropsychiatric disorders. In the absence of expert consensus guidance and well-controlled comparison trials, we present a set of guidelines to inform initiation, dosing and monitoring of use in adults. Further, in these guidelines we provide practical information on drug-drug interactions and adverse drug reactions, and a brief review of discontinuation syndromes, potential for abuse, use during pregnancy and cost considerations. We also provide drug utilization review forms for each NGA to facilitate implementation of these guidelines, these guidelines provide a practical and necessary resource for practitioners treating psychiatric disorders and challenging behaviors in adult individuals with ID.

Psychotropic medication use among nursing home residents in Austria: a cross-sectional study

Background

The use of psychotropic medications and their adverse effects in frail elderly has been debated extensively. However, recent data from European studies show that these drugs are still frequently prescribed in nursing home residents. In Austria, prevalence data are lacking. We aimed to determine the prevalence of psychotropic medication prescription in Austrian nursing homes and to explore characteristics associated with their prescription.

Methods

Cross-sectional study and association analysis in forty-eight out of 50 nursing homes with 1844 out of a total of 2005 residents in a defined urban-rural region in Austria. Prescribed medication was retrieved from residents' charts. Psychotropic medications were coded according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification 2005. Cluster-adjusted multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate institutional and residents' characteristics associated with prescription.

Results

Residents' mean age was 81; 73% of residents were female. Mean cluster-adjusted prevalence of residents with at least one psychotropic medication was 74.6% (95% confidence interval, CI, 72.0–77.2). A total of 45.9% (95% CI 42.7–49.1) had at least one prescription of an antipsychotic medication. Two third of all antipsychotic medications were prescribed for bedtime use only. Anxiolytics were prescribed in 22.2% (95% CI 20.0–24.5), hypnotics in 13.3% (95% CI 11.3–15.4), and antidepressants in 36.8% (95% CI 34.1–39.6) of residents. None of the institutional characteristics and only few residents' characteristics were significantly associated with psychotropic medication prescription. Permanent restlessness was positively associated with psychotropic medication prescription (AOR 1.54, 95% CI 1.32–1.79) whereas cognitive impairment was inversely associated (AOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56–0.88).

Conclusion

Frequency of psychotropic medication prescription is high in Austrian nursing homes compared to recent published data from other countries. Interventions should aim at reduction and optimisation of prescriptions.

Diabetes mellitus and drug-induced Parkinsonism: a case-control study

To investigate if diabetes is more common in drug-induced parkinsonism patients. We performed a hospital-based retrospective case-control study on 44 drug-induced parkinsonism (DIP) patients, 177 Parkinson disease patients, and 176 acute stroke patients matched for age and sex who were seen over the same period at the same hospital. The frequency of diabetes, age-at onset and sex were compared between DIP and IPD or acute stroke. Multivariate analysis showed that patients with diabetes are more frequent in DIP compared with IPD (p<0.001, adjusted OR 5.48; 95% CI, 2.52-11.94). The frequency of diabetes in DIP was comparable to that in acute stroke patients (p=0.16, adjusted OR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.32-1.21). These data suggest that diabetes may be a risk factor for DIP. Drugs with dopamine receptor blocking potency should be avoided in elderly with diabetes.

Delirium and sedation in the intensive care unit: survey of behaviors and attitudes of 1384 healthcare professionals

OBJECTIVE

A 2001 survey found that most healthcare professionals considered intensive care unit (ICU) delirium as a serious problem, but only 16% used a validated delirium screening tool. Our objective was to assess beliefs and practices regarding ICU delirium and sedation management.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Between October 2006 and May 2007, a survey was distributed to ICU practitioners in 41 North American hospitals, seven international critical care meetings and courses, and the American Thoracic Society e-mail database.

STUDY PARTICIPANTS

A convenience sample of 1384 healthcare professionals including 970 physicians, 322 nurses, 23 respiratory care practitioners, 26 pharmacists, 18 nurse practitioners and physicians' assistants, and 25 others.

RESULTS

A majority [59% (766 of 1300)] estimated that more than one in four adult mechanically ventilated patients experience delirium. More than half [59% (774 of 1302)] screen for delirium, with 33% of those respondents (258 of 774) using a specific screening tool. A majority of respondents use a sedation protocol, but 29% (396 of 1355) still do not. A majority (76%, 990 of 1309) has a written policy on spontaneous awakening trials (SATs), but the minority of respondents (44%, 446 of 1019) practice spontaneous awakening trials on more than half of ICU days.

CONCLUSIONS

Delirium is considered a serious problem by a majority of healthcare professionals, and the percent of practitioners using a specific screening tool has increased since the last published survey data. Although most respondents have adopted specific sedation protocols and have an approved approach to stopping sedation daily, few report even modest compliance with daily cessation of sedation.

Failure of recognition of drug-induced parkinsonism in the elderly

Our objective was to evaluate the ability of neurologists to recognize and diagnose drug-induced Parkinsonism (DIP) in the elderly. DIP is a diagnostic challenge because it can be indistinguishable from Parkinson's disease, especially in the elderly. It is frequently under-recognized by psychiatrists and primary care physicians. Atypical antipsychotics (AA) are advertised for their low propensity to cause DIP. This may add to problems with recognition. We performed a retrospective record review of consecutive new parkinsonian patients seen over 2 years in a movement disorders clinic to examine the frequency, causative agents, and diagnostic accuracy of DIP by physicians, particularly neurologists. Of 354 Parkinsonian patients evaluated, 24 (6.8%) had DIP, 46% of these were due to AA and 29% were caused by metoclopramide. Of the 24 patients with DIP, only one was previously diagnosed accurately according to records. Nineteen patients (79%) were previously evaluated by a neurologist, and none of them was diagnosed with DIP. The primary reason for failure to recognize DIP relates to under-recognition of AA as possible cause. A majority remained on the inciting agents while dopaminergic drugs were prescribed. DIP was reversible when the inciting drug was stopped. DIP is a common form of parkinsonism and is under-recognized, even by neurologists. AA and metoclopramide do not appear to be well-known to cause DIP. Cessation of the offending agent results in improvement of symptoms and would eliminate the need for dopaminergic agents, which are known to commonly cause side effects in the elderly.

Rethinking antipsychotic formulary policy

In this commentary, we review recent research suggesting that (a) second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) may be no more effective than first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs), (b) the reduced risk of EPS and tardive dyskinesia with SGAs is more weakly supported by the research literature than has been appreciated, and (c) benefits may be offset by greater metabolic risks of some SGAs and their substantially greater cost. Bearing in mind, as well, that risperidone, currently the least expensive SGA, will soon be available as an even less expensive generic drug, we propose a new algorithm for maintenance antipsychotic therapy. We further outline a cautious implementation procedure that relies on standardized documentation and feedback, without a restrictive formulary that would limit physician choice. The algorithm outlined here and the process for its implementation are intended as a stimulus for discussion of potential policy responses, not as a finalized proposition.

A composite screening tool for medication reviews of outpatients: general issues with specific examples

Regular performance of medication reviews is prominent among methods that have been advocated to reduce the extent and seriousness of drug-related problems, such as adverse drug reactions, drug-disease interactions, drug-drug interactions, drug ineffectiveness and cost ineffectiveness. Several screening tools have been developed to guide practising healthcare professionals and researchers in reviewing the medication patterns of elderly patients; however, each of these tools has its own limitations. This review discusses a wide range of general prescription-, treatment- and patient-related issues that should be taken into account when reviewing medication patterns by implicit screening. These include generic and therapeutic substitution; potentially superfluous or inappropriate medications; potentially inappropriate dosages or duration of treatment; drug-disease and drug-drug interactions; under-treatment; making use of laboratory test results; patient adherence, experiences and habits; appropriate dosage forms and packaging. A broad selection of specific examples and references that can be used as a basis for explicit screening of medication patterns in outpatients is also offered.

Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of reduced tardive dyskinesia with second-generation antipsychotics

BACKGROUND

Second-generation antipsychotics may have few advantages over older, cheaper drugs, except for possibly reduced risk of tardive dyskinesia.

AIMS

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of second-generation antipsychotics with regard to reducing tardive dyskinesia.

METHOD

Literature was reviewed on risk of tardive dyskinesia with second-generation antipsychotics; on severity, duration and impairment of tardive dyskinesia; and on the relationship of this disorder to quality of life and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Diverse cost and benefit assumptions and of 1-year and 5-year planning horizons were examined in a deterministic sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

Estimating 0.143 QALYs lost per case of severe tardive dyskinesia, 1-year cost-effectiveness cumulative estimates ranged from pounds 74,000 (dollars 149,000) to pounds 342,000 (dollars 683,000) per QALY, all above the conventional policy threshold of pounds 25,000 (dollars 50,000).

CONCLUSIONS

Reduction of tardive dyskinesia with second-generation antipsychotics appears unlikely to meet standards for cost-effectiveness.

Antipsychotic use in older adults with Parkinson's disease

The choice of agents to treat psychotic symptoms in Parkinson's disease is important given the potential for antipsychotics to worsen Parkinsonism. The purpose of this study was to estimate the incidence of psychotic symptoms requiring treatment in individuals with Parkinson's disease after starting dopaminergic medications, and to describe the agents being selected as initial antipsychotic therapy. Using the administrative health care databases of Ontario, Canada, individuals 66 years of age or older with Parkinson's disease who were newly treated with dopaminergic agents were identified. Subsequent prescriptions for antipsychotic medications were then identified. A total of 10,347 older adults were newly started on dopaminergic agents between 1998 and 2003. The Kaplan-Meier estimate for the cumulative probability of requiring an antipsychotic at 7 years was 35%; 499 individuals (4.8%; 5.2/100 person-years) were prescribed an antipsychotic within 1 year of starting dopaminergic therapy. The proportion of initial antipsychotic prescriptions for typical antipsychotics decreased from 56% (42 of 75) in 1998 to 9% (8 of 88) in 2002. Antipsychotic use is common in individuals with Parkinsonism newly treated with dopaminergic medication. Typical antipsychotics are still commonly being chosen as first-line agents for older patients, indicating a need for interventions to improve practice.

Drug-induced parkinsonism in the elderly

Drug-induced parkinsonism is primarily caused by drugs that interfere with dopamine stimulation. Antipsychotic drugs are the most common offenders, but drug-induced parkinsonism may be seen with many other drugs, such as antiemetics and certain calcium-channel blockers. These medications are widely used in the elderly. Unlike the first generation of antipsychotic drugs, all of which cause parkinsonism and other extrapyramidal side effects, atypical antipsychotics have motor side effects that are not uniform. Among the atypicals, only quetiapine and clozapine are not associated with drug-induced parkinsonism. Since drug-induced parkinsonism is frequently under-recognized, it may be devastating in an elderly person with already compromised gait.

The effect of atypical versus typical antipsychotics on tardive dyskinesia: a naturalistic study

OBJECTIVE

The aim was testing whether atypical antipsychotics (versus typicals) were associated with less risk of tardive dyskinesia (TD) in 516 severely mentally ill patients.

METHODS

The sample included 11% (57/516) with no exposure before current treatment with atypicals; 9% (48/516) with prior and current treatment with atypicals but no exposure to typicals; 18% (94/516) with lifetime exposure to typicals for <5 years (plus atypicals); and 62% (317/516) with lifetime exposure to typicals for >or=5 years (plus atypicals). The Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) was used to assess dyskinetic movements. Following Schooler and Kane's criteria TD was considered present when mild movements were present in at least two body areas or moderate movements were present in at least one body area.

RESULTS

TD prevalences were 5% (3/57) in previously naïve patients, 19% (9/48) after exposure only to atypicals, 19% (18/94) after typical exposure of <5 years, and 42% (132/317) after typical exposure of >or=5 years. There was no significant effect comparing those taking only atypicals to those exposed to typicals for <5 years (OR = 1.0, CI 0.42-2.5).

CONCLUSION

This study is limited by the naturalistic design, the relatively small samples in the first two groups, the lack of information on the duration of the atypicals and their relatively recent introduction to the market (ziprasidone and aripiprazole were introduced to the market in the middle of the study). This study raises the question that new TD studies need to establish whether decades of treatment with atypical antipsychotics make a difference.

Treatment Strategies for the Behavioral Symptoms of Alzheimer's Disease: Focus on Early Pharmacologic Intervention

The impact of behavioral symptoms associated with Alzheimer's disease is substantial. These symptoms contribute to diminished quality of life for patients and caregivers and increase the cost of care in nursing homes. Early recognition of behavioral symptoms and appropriate treatment are important for successful management. Nonpharmacologic strategies remain the cornerstone of the management of Alzheimer's disease-related behavioral symptoms. However, nonpharmacologic strategies may not be effective for problem behaviors, and pharmacologic intervention may be necessary. Relevant articles were identified through various MEDLINE searches with no date restrictions, with an emphasis on recent studies that used cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine. Additional reports of interest were identified from the reference lists of these articles. To facilitate cross-study analyses in the review of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine, the database search was limited to randomized, placebo-controlled trials that used the Neuropsychiatric Inventory to assess behavioral symptoms of Alzheimer's disease. Overall, evidence from trials of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine suggests that when these agents are optimized for the various stages of Alzheimer's disease, they can also prevent the emergence of neuropsychiatric symptoms. Although results from the literature are not uniformly positive, cholinesterase inhibitors have been shown to produce significant improvements in behavioral symptoms in patients with both mild- to-moderate and moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease. Evidence also indicates that memantine might be of benefit as an adjunct to long-term cholinesterase inhibitor treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease and that memantine monotherapy may have some beneficial effects on behavior in patients with mild-to-moderate disease. Of importance, although no direct comparisons have been performed, these agents seem to have an improved safety and tolerability profile compared with the frequently used antipsychotic drugs. When nonpharmacologic strategies are deemed insufficient to ease problem behaviors in patients with Alzheimer's disease, treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors, alone or in combination with memantine as appropriate for the stage of disease, may be considered as a first-line option in the early pharmacologic management of Alzheimer's disease-related behavioral symptoms.

Drug-induced parkinsonism

Drug-induced parkinsonism (DIP) is the second cause of akinetic rigid syndrome in the Western world and its prevalence is increasing and approaching that of idiopathic Parkinson's disease due to the ageing of the population and to the rising of polypharmacotherapy. DIP was initially reported as a complication of neuroleptics in psychiatric patients, but it has also been described with a great diversity of compounds such as antiemetics, drugs used for the treatment of vertigo, antidepressants, calcium channel antagonists, antiarrythmics, antiepileptics, cholinomimetics and other drugs. Although traditionally considered reversible, DIP may persist after drug withdrawal. At least 10% of patients with DIP develop persistent and progressive parkinsonism in spite of the discontinuation of the causative drug. Irreversible or progressive DIP has been considered as an indication of presymptomatic parkinsonian deficit, unmasked but not caused by the offending drug, but it could be explained by persistent toxicity of the responsible pharmacological agents on the nigrostriatal dopamine pathway. The best treatment of DIP is prevention, including the avoidance of prescription of causative drugs whenever it is not strictly necessary. In patients who require potentially risky medication, it is necessary to perform adequate monitoring for early parkinsonian deficits and early discontinuation if these deficits appear. Atypical neuroleptics are associated with lower risk than first generation antipsychotic drugs. Special precautions are needed in elderly subjects, in patients treated with multiple drugs for prolonged periods of time and in those with familial risk factors including familial parkinsonism or tremor, or in those with genetic variants of genes involved in idiopathic Parkinson's disease.

Atypical antipsychotics to treat the neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia

Neuropsychiatric symptoms are common in older adults with dementia and can be associated with a rapid decline in cognitive and functional status. This article reviews the current literature supporting the use of atypical antipsychotic medications in this population. Among the currently available atypical antipsychotics, risperidone and olanzapine have been the most widely studied in double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Despite the common use of other atypical antipsychotic medications, their efficacy and safety in older adults with dementia has not been as extensively studied. Some controversy surrounds the use of atypical antipsychotic agents in older adults with the suggestion that they may increase the incidence of stroke or even death. Despite the potential for increased risk of harm from the use of these medications, atypical antipsychotics are often effective in treating troublesome neuropsychiatric symptoms refractory to other treatments. Whenever possible, these atypical antipsychotic drug treatments should be combined with non-pharmacological treatments to limit the need and dose of antipsychotic drugs and constant monitoring for potential harms should be maintained. The choice of which atypical antipsychotic agent can be guided by the nature and severity of the target symptom and the medication least likely to cause harm to the patient.

Pharmacogenetics of antipsychotic therapy: pivotal research issues and the prospects for clinical implementation

The core hypothesis underlying pharmacogenetics is that genetic factors play a significant role in the well-recognized differences between individuals in response to medication and susceptibility to adverse effects. If these genetic factors can be identified and understood, they may serve as predictors to guide clinicians in tailoring medication to the individual patient. Recent developments in the field of antipsychotic drug treatment suggest that pharmacogenetics could play an important role, permitting the use of first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) for patients in whom the use of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) is limited by efficacy considerations or adverse effects. In this paper, key issues that need to be taken into consideration in designing and interpreting pharmacogenetic studies of antipsychotic drugs are discussed against the background of data emanating from studies on the genetics of tardive dyskinesia (TD), an important adverse effect of FGAs. The issues considered include the advantages and potential pitfalls of case-control association studies of pharmacogenetic traits, the role of demographic factors such as age and gender, additive effects of genes, and gene-gene and gene-environment interaction. The prospects for implementation of pharmacogenetic testing in the clinic are considered in the context of a preliminary model that has been tested for prediction of susceptibility to TD.

Atypical Antipsychotics for Neuropsychiatric Symptoms of Dementia

Recent concerns regarding the use of atypical antipsychotics when used for the treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia have led to a flurry of studies attempting to re-evaluate their place in therapy. We critically review current evidence on the safety profiles of these agents in patients with behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) and provide recommendations to guide the clinician. Potential risks with this class of medications include extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), weight gain, diabetes mellitus, cardiac conduction abnormalities (e.g. corrected QT [QTc] interval prolongation), cerebrovascular adverse events and mortality. Compared with placebo, treatment of BPSD with atypical antipsychotics leads to little or no increase in EPS and no significant weight change. Compared with typical antipsychotics, treatment of BPSD with atypical antipsychotics leads to a reduced risk of EPS, lower incidences of tardive dyskinesias and no significant weight gain. Atypical antipsychotics have not been associated with glucose intolerance, diabetes or hyperlipidaemia in elderly dementia patients. Both typical and atypical antipsychotics have been associated with cardiac conduction abnormalities, with the magnitude of QTc prolongation being slightly smaller with atypical antipsychotics. Randomised controlled trials suggest that atypical antipsychotics are associated with an increased risk of cerebrovascular adverse events, such as stroke, and an increased mortality compared with placebo. However, it appears that typical antipsychotics have similar risks of cerebrovascular adverse events and death. An increased risk of anticholinergic adverse effects and falls must also be considered with both typical and atypical antipsychotics. In summary, atypical antipsychotics are associated with potentially serious adverse events. Before prescribing these medications in elderly dementia patients, baseline EPS, ECG abnormalities and concomitant medications should be assessed, and the presence of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and metabolic risk factors should be taken into consideration when benefits and risks are being weighed.

Vision Side Effects with Erectile Dysfunction Agents: Paradoxical Bronchoconstriction with Albuterol: Thalidomide-Associated Thrombocytopenia: Can Antibiotic Treatment of Acne Cause Upper Respiratory Infections?: Cell Phone Causes Interference with Infusion Pump: Headaches Associated with Oral Contraceptives: Cardiotoxicity with Cancer Chemotherapy: Atypical Antipsychotic Agents and Parkinsonism

The purpose of this feature is to heighten awareness of specific adverse drug reactions (ADRs), discuss methods of prevention, and promote reporting of ADRs to the FDA's medWatch program (800-FDA-1088). If you have reported an interesting preventable ADR to medWatch, please consider sharing the account with our readers.