Sexual transmission during the incubation period of primary HIV infection

Early versus delayed antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infection : a review of the current guidelines from an immunological perspective

The development and implementation of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for the treatment of the human immunodeficiency virus has revolutionised the care of patients with this disease. Despite the positive impact that antiretroviral therapy has had on the lives of individuals with HIV infection, the adverse effects, potential long-term toxicities, complexity of regimens, development of drug resistance and cost have made decisions about when to initiate HAART difficult. The benefits and risks of antiretroviral therapy vary considerably among patients at different stages of disease, mainly as a result of the irreversible destruction of the immune system that occurs as HIV infection progresses. In acute HIV infection, the primary aim of treatment is preservation and reconstitution of HIV-specific immune function. In symptomatic or late-stage disease, the goal is control of viral replication with resulting improvement in non-HIV-specific immunity, which leads to decreased morbidity and increased survival. The most controversial decision involves when to start therapy in persons with asymptomatic chronic HIV, where the benefits are less well established and may be outweighed by the drawbacks, depending on the individual patient. In all patients, the advantages and disadvantages must be considered carefully, and the readiness and ability of the individual to adhere to a complex multidrug regimen needs to be assessed before the initiation of therapy.

Envelope diversity, coreceptor usage and syncytium-inducing phenotype of HIV-1 variants in saliva and blood during primary infection

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether oral fluids can serve as a model for studying HIV-1 shedding, we compared the genetic diversity, coreceptor use, and syncytium-inducing (SI) phenotype of viral variants in saliva and blood during primary HIV-1 infection.

DESIGN

Observational cross-sectional cohort study.

METHODS

Blood plasma and saliva were sampled from 17 men early in primary HIV-1 infection. Viral diversity, predicted X4/R5 genotype and SI phenotype in samples were determined by heteroduplex tracking assays (HTAs) targeting the V1/V2 and V3 gp120 regions, sequence analyses and MT-2 cell assay.

RESULTS

Identical or very similar HTA banding and deduced amino acid sequence patterns in the V1/V2 and V3-encoding regions were observed between paired fluids of each subject. As assessed by V1/V2 HTA, 10 subjects had a single major viral variant and seven subjects exhibited multiple yet highly related variants. Two subjects had V1/V2 variants in blood that were identical to saliva but present in different relative abundances. A sexual transmission pair exhibited genetically dissimilar variants, suggesting transmission of a minor variant or rapid evolution during initial viremia. All subjects harbored R5 non-SI variants.

CONCLUSIONS

Relatively homogenous viral populations detected in plasma and saliva prior to seroconversion suggests that HIV-1 is disseminated to oral fluids early in infection and reflects the quasispecies in blood. These findings suggest that the oral cavity may serve as an easily accessible surrogate model for studying the dynamics of HIV-1 shedding at mucosal sites.

Decline in the rate of genotypic resistance to antiretroviral drugs in recent HIV seroconverters in Madrid

Genotypic resistance to antiretroviral drugs was analysed in plasma from 57 acute or recent HIV seroconverters in Madrid. The overall prevalence of drug-associated primary resistance mutations was 25.8% in 1997-1999, but declined to 3.8% in 2000-2001. The lower rate in recent years suggested that most new HIV infections derive from viraemic individuals unaware of their HIV- positive status, rather than from those failing antiretroviral treatment. Drug-resistance testing is thus not required before beginning antiretroviral therapy.

HIV prevention before HAART in sub-Saharan Africa

Data on the cost-effectiveness of HIV prevention in sub-Saharan Africa and on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) indicate that prevention is at least 28 times more cost effective than HAART. We aim to show that funding HAART at the expense of prevention means greater loss of life. To maximise health benefits, the next major increments of HIV funding in sub-Saharan Africa should be devoted mainly to prevention and to some non-HAART treatment and care. Funds should be allocated to HAART primarily for demonstration projects that will help prepare for scaled-up HAART provision following broad population coverage by prevention programmes. UNAIDS and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine recently estimated that at least US $9.2 billion annually is required to mount an appropriate response to the HIV pandemic, including substantial funding for HAART. To date, US $1.96 billion has been committed to the newly-established UN Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria. It is a moral imperative that expanded programmes to control HIV be implemented without delay, and that the goal of US $9.2 billion or more in annual spending be attained as rapidly as possible. The findings and recommendations of this analysis pertain to the phasing in of additional HIV-related activities during the current period of improved but inadequate funding.