Loss to Follow-up Among Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Who Received Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections

CONSEQUENCES OF LAPSES IN TREATMENT WITH VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR INHIBITORS IN NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION IN ROUTINE CLINICAL PRACTICE

PURPOSE

Evaluating outcomes in patients receiving intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors for neovascular age-related macular degeneration whom experience a lapse in treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review evaluating 3,304 patients ≥18 years who experienced treatment lapses ≥3 months compared with control counterparts. Demographic information, macular thickness as measured by central subfield thickness, and visual acuity were collected at baseline, the first postlapse appointment, and at 3, 6, and 12 months after the lapse for the study group.

RESULTS

Lapse (n = 241) and control patients (n = 241) had similar baseline visual acuity and central subfield thickness (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study: 58.9 ± 20.2 [20/63] vs. 59.2 ± 20.1 [20/63]; central subfield thickness: 252.4 ± 63.2 µm vs. 259.8 ± 66.2 µm, P = 0.21). Analysis revealed that lapse patients experienced a significant increase in central subfield thickness after lapse when compared with controls (279.4 ± 86.9 µm vs. 253.7 ± 65.9 µm, P < 0.01), which normalized on resumption of treatment (259.1 ± 79 µm vs. 246.8 ± 57.6 µm, P = 0.06). Study patients also experienced loss in the visual acuity after lapse when compared with controls (52.9 ± 23.6 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [20/100] vs. 59.9 ± 20.8 [20/63] Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study, P < 0.01) that did not recover through 12 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration who have lapses in care are at risk for poorer outcomes. Although macular thickness normalizes on resumption of treatment, their decline in the visual acuity does not recover.

The Vision Detroit Project: Visual Burden, Barriers, and Access to Eye Care in an Urban Setting

Purpose: Vision loss and blindness are among the top ten disabilities in the United States, yet access and utilization of eye care remains low. Vision Detroit aimed to address eye-care disparities via community-based screenings. By investigating burden of eye disease and barriers to eye-care utilization in an underserved urban community, we may direct efforts to improve access.Methods: Twenty-three screenings were conducted from March 2015-November 2017. Patient information gathered at screenings were demographics, medical and social history, eye exam/referral history, insurance status, primary care physician (PCP) status, and patient-perceived eye-care barriers.Results: Three-hundred-eighty patients were screened, 42% African American and 51% Hispanic. Average age was 53 ± 16.4 years, 70% reported vision problems, 50% reported over two years of vision problems, and average habitual visual acuity in best-seeing eye was 20/37. Eye-care underutilization was reported in 61% of type-2 diabetics. Older age and PCP recommendations/referrals were associated with increased utilization in all patients. Insurance was the most common barrier (53%); of the 55% insured, 31% reported financial barriers. Employed patients were more likely than unemployed to report a time barrier (odds ratio = 1.76, 95% confidence interval 1.03-3.01). Those with high school or less education reported "unaware of need", "unsure where to go", "transportation", and "insurance" as barriers more often.Conclusions: Visual burden was pervasive, yet access was suboptimal. Financial, logistical, and awareness barriers were common. PCP referral and older age were associated with increased utilization. Those less educated reported more barriers, highlighting the need to address fiscal concerns and eye-health education.

Outcomes and Reasons for Late Presentation of Lens Induced Glaucoma: A Prospective Study

PURPOSE

To determine the clinical outcomes and causes of late presentation in lens induced glaucoma (LIG).

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred sixty-five patients with LIG who underwent cataract surgery.

METHODS

Preoperative data collection included a questionnaire about reasons for late presentation, socioeconomic status, visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), and the lens and angle status of the fellow eye. All patients underwent manual small-incision cataract surgery. Postoperative vision, IOP, the anterior segment, and the fundus were evaluated at days 1, 15, and 30.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Reasons for late presentation, status of the fellow eyes, and surgical outcomes, including visual acuity and IOP at the 1-month postoperative visit.

RESULTS

Mean age at presentation was 63.8 years, and the female-to-male ratio was 1.4:1. Of the entire cohort, 70.3% were phacolytic and 29.7% had phacomorphic glaucoma. The main causes for late presentation was nonfinancial (81.2%); of these, good vision in fellow eye and lack of escort to the hospital were the major reasons. Most fellow eyes were pseudophakic (72.1%). After surgery, 75.6% gained best-corrected visual acuity of 6/18 or more. Six percent experienced poor visual recovery (≤6/60) with optic atrophy as the major cause. Only 7.9% required further glaucoma management in the form of topical medications. Delayed presentation (>15 days) was associated with poor visual outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonfinancial causes, including good vision in the fellow eye and lack of escort, were the major determinants of late presentation. Most patients were pseudophakic in the fellow eye. After cataract extraction, only a few LIG patients required further glaucoma management.

Short-Term Effects of COVID-19-Related Deferral of Intravitreal Injection Visits

PURPOSE

To determine secondary effects of the mandated COVID-19 pandemic closure period for elective treatment on non-elective, injection-based retina care and outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional, retrospective analysis of a single-provider outpatient clinic across multiple satellites, consecutive patients returning for intravitreal injections (IVIs) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor or corticosteroids were identified as "delayed" or "undelayed" during a six-week study interval during the COVID-19 pandemic that closely following a mandated period of prohibited elective encounters. A "delayed" encounter was defined as having a follow-up interval exceeding 33% of the recommended cycle. Patients seen for IVIs during the corresponding six-week interval a year previously were identified for study as pre-COVID-19 controls. Main outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) assessment based on findings of intraretinal or subretinal fluid consistent with new or recurrent neovascular events.

RESULTS

The study included 183 eyes of 144 patients who underwent IVI-based care from June 18, 2020, through August 7, 2020, compared to 193 eyes of 154 patients injected during the corresponding interval 1 year before. There were 62 eyes of 46 patients seen in the study period later than scheduled (among 144 patients of 183 eyes in total), which represented a larger proportion of delayed patients compared to the previous year (31.9% vs. 14.9%, p<0.0005). Considering the patterns from the control group, the attributed delay due to COVID-19 was 15.0% of patients. The delayed return eyes had a greater decline in BCVA (3 letters), higher rates of worsened OCT results (48%), and prompted reduction in previously prescribed injection intervals (p<0.02).

CONCLUSION

The unintended consequence of delayed care of patients on established care regimens should be anticipated, and mitigate strategies considered if similar restrictions are mandated in the future.

Nonadherence or Nonpersistence to Intravitreal Injection Therapy for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review

TOPIC

Systematic review of risk factors for nonadherence and nonpersistence to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injection therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Lack of adherence (nonadherence) or undertreatment (nonpersistence) with respect to evidence from clinical trials remains a significant barrier to optimizing real-world outcomes for patients with nAMD. Contributing factors and strategies to address this are poorly understood.

METHODS

Studies that reported factors for nonadherence and nonpersistence to anti-VEGF therapy as well as studies examining strategies to improve this were included. Trial eligibility and data extraction were conducted according to Cochrane review methods. Risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Method Assessment Tool and certainty of evidence evaluated according to the GRADE Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research tool. Data were collated descriptively.

RESULTS

Of the 1284 abstract results screened, 124 articles were assessed in full and 37 studies met the inclusion criteria. Definitions of nonadherence and nonpersistence varied or were not reported. Nonpersistence occurred early, with up to 50% of patients stopping treatment by 24 months. High rates of nonadherence were similarly reported, occurring in 32% to 95% of patients. Certainty of this finding was downgraded to a moderate level because of the heterogeneity in definitions used across studies. Multiple factors determine nonadherence and nonpersistence, including at the condition, therapy, patient, social/economic, and health systems/healthcare team levels. Moderate quality evidence points to lower baseline vision and poorer response to treatment as condition-related variables. The effects of other factors were of lower certainty, predominantly due to small numbers and potential biases in retrospective assessment. Although many factors are not modifiable (e.g., patient comorbidity), other factors are potentially correctable (e.g., lack of transport or mismatched patient expectations). Evidence on strategies to improve adherence and persistence is limited, but where available, these have proven effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Awareness of factors related to poor patient adherence and persistence in nAMD could help identify at-risk populations and improve real-world outcomes. Further work is required to develop uniform definitions and establish high-quality evidence on interventions that can be easily implemented.

Longer-acting treatments for neovascular age-related macular degeneration-present and future

The treatment of neovascular AMD (nAMD) has been revolutionized by the introduction of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents. Though, there is a tremendous gap between the outcomes in randomized clinical trials and real-world settings, where long-term outcomes are not as good as expected. This is due to undertreatment, i.e., fewer injection and low monitoring frequency. Treatment burden due to frequent injections remains a major limitation. Long-lasting treatments provide promising solutions for this unmet need by achieving better results with less mandatory injections. This review aims to cover the current state in this field and also discuss the mechanism of action, data from pivotal trials, and safety profile of long-acting treatments in present and future, going into details about the following agents: Brolucizumab, Faricimab, Abipicar, and Conbercept.

Impact of a Patient Support Program on Patient Beliefs About Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Persistence to Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare persistence between patients prescribed intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in Australia enrolled on a patient support program (PSP) with that of a sample of patients from the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) dataset (10% PBS sample); explore predictors of persistence; describe changes in patient beliefs over the course of their enrollment in a PSP for patients treated with IVT-AFL for nAMD; and assess patient satisfaction.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

Participants prescribed IVT-AFL for the treatment of nAMD were invited to participate in the PSP. The PSP provided tailored support to patients through provision of a welcome pack, structured telephone calls, and information booklets. Persistence was defined in the PSP as the time from the start date in the program, until discontinuation from the program; and as the time from initial prescription until 6-months after the date of last prescription in the 10% PBS set. Persistence on the program and risk of discontinuation were modeled using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards. In addition, persistence was compared between patients on the PSP and a 10% PBS sample of patients prescribed IVT-AFL for nAMD.

RESULTS

Persistence on treatment at 24 months was significantly higher in patients enrolled on the PSP compared to the PBS cohort (88% vs 64%, p<0.05). The risk of discontinuation in patients enrolled on the PSP was higher in patients identified at screening as "high-risk", those who were younger, or those with significant distance to travel for treatment. During the PSP, patients reported significant increase in their belief that they had control over their condition (6.1 ± 3.5 to 6.8 ± 3.7; p=0.0034) and a reduction in concerns about treatment. Satisfaction with the PSP was high.

CONCLUSION

Patients provided with access to a PSP showed better persistence on treatment and improved beliefs about nAMD disease and its treatment compared to those in the PBS sample. Improved persistence rates may translate into better outcomes for the patient and the healthcare system, however, further research is required to determine which elements of the program are most beneficial, particularly to those at high risk of discontinuation.

Association of Visit Adherence and Visual Acuity in Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Secondary Analysis of the Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatment Trial

Importance

Visit adherence has been shown to play a significant role in patient health outcomes. The effect of missing visits on visual acuity (VA) in individuals with neovascular age-related macular degeneration has yet to be characterized.

Objective

To quantify the association between patients' adherence to randomized clinical trial visits and VA in individuals with neovascular age-related macular degeneration based on 4 visit adherence metrics.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This is a secondary analysis of the Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatment Trial randomized clinical trial. Individuals with age-related macular degeneration were recruited from 44 clinical centers in the United States between February 2008 and December 2009. The 2-year study protocol required 1 visit every 4 weeks (every 21-35 days for a total of 26 visits) for monthly vs pro re nata treatments of bevacizumab vs ranibizumab. Analysis took place from November 2018 through May 2019.

Exposures

Visit adherence was measured in 4 ways: total number of missed visits, average number of days (avg days) between each visit, longest duration in days (max days) between visits, and visit constancy (the tally of 3-month periods with at least 1 visit attended). Average and max days were also categorized as on time (28-35 days), late (36-60 days), and very late (>60 days).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Change in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study VA between the baseline and the last visit. Linear multivariate regression models were applied to analyze the association between visit adherence and change in VA, controlling for age, sex, baseline VA, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drug, number of injections, and dosing regimen.

Results

Of 1178 patients, the mean (SD) age was 79.1 (7.3) years, and 727 (61.7%) were women. The mean (SD) number of missed visits was 2.4 (3.1). Overall, 1091 patients (92.6%) had complete visit constancy during the entire study period. Average days were categorized with 1060 patients (90.0%) classified as on time, 108 (9.2%) were late, and 10 (0.8%) were very late. For max days between visits, 197 patients (16.7%) were on time, 773 (65.6%) were late, and 208 (17.7%) were very late. After controlling for covariates, the late (avg days = -6.1; max days = -2.0) and very late (avg days = -12.5; max days = -5.9) groups saw fewer letters in both the avg and max days categories than patients in the on-time group (P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

These results provide evidence to support the concept that visit adherence contributes to VA outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. The magnitude of the association of visit adherence with VA outcomes in this clinical scenario suggests that substantial effort should be expended to strive for visit adherence or therapeutic strategies that reduce the visit burden without compromising VA outcomes.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00593450.

Impact of Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Diabetic Retinopathy Severity on Poor Ophthalmic Follow-Up in a Rural Vermont and New York Population

Objective

To investigate the impact of socioeconomic disadvantage and diabetic retinopathy severity on follow-up for vision care among people with diabetes mellitus (DM) residing in rural Vermont and northern New York State.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of people with DM who visited our academic eye clinic at least once between October 1, 2015, and March 31, 2016, was done. Of 1,466 unique patient visits, 500 were chosen for full chart review by simple random sampling. DM follow-up within 1 year was recommended for 331 adults. Data about prescribed and actual follow-up intervals were extracted. Regression models were used to identify factors associated with poor attendance at follow-up appointments.

Results

Sixty-eight [20.5%] patients had poor follow-up, defined as no ophthalmology visit within double the prescribed interval. Of these, 57 were not seen in follow-up by the end of study observation. Poor follow-up was greatest among socioeconomically disadvantaged patients, as defined by Medicaid enrollment (odds ratio [OR], 1.95; 95% CI, 1.07–3.56) in comparison to non-disadvantaged patients. Follow-up was better among those with moderate or worse diabetic retinopathy (OR, 0.38 95% CI, 0.20–0.70), and those with macular edema (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.057–0.62).

Conclusion

Medicaid insurance and better diabetic retinopathy status were associated with worse follow-up among our predominantly rural population of patients. Patients who did not follow-up within double the recommended interval were unlikely to follow-up at all. Interventions are needed to target those at highest risk for poor follow-up.

Six and eight weeks injection frequencies of bevacizumab are non-inferior to the current four weeks injection frequency for quality of life in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a randomized controlled trial

Purpose

Patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nARMD) will not deteriorate on visual acuity and retinal thickness when treated with bevacizumab injection frequencies of 6 or 8 weeks compared to 4 weeks. This study aimed to investigate this non-inferiority in quality of life (QoL). We hypothesized that less frequent bevacizumab injections are not inferior regarding patients reported QoL.

Methods

Patients were randomized to bevacizumab every 4 (n = 64), 6 (n = 63), and 8 weeks (n = 64). Patients were at least 65 years old, have a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/200 to 20/20, no previous ARMD treatment and active leakage. Vision-related QoL questionnaire NEI VFQ-39 was used to assess QoL at baseline and after 1 year. General QoL questionnaire SF-36 was included for secondary analysis. Multilevel analyses were performed, correcting for age, gender and baseline.

Results

The 6 (3.68; 95% CI − 0.63 to 8.00) and 8 (2.15; 95% CI − 2.26 to 6.56) weeks bevacizumab regimens resulted in non-inferior QoL differences compared to 4 weeks on the NEI VFQ-39. Also on the SF-36 the differences were well within the non-inferiority limits.

Conclusion

Non-inferiority of the 6 and 8 weeks frequencies was demonstrated compared to 4 weeks on vision-related and general QoL in patients with nARMD. These results are in line with previously published results of lower frequency injections regarding visual acuity and central retinal thickness. Lower injection frequency may reduce burden, side effects, and treatment costs. In consideration of these results, 8 weeks frequency injections of intravitreal bevacizumab could be considered in patients with nARMD.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-020-02580-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Long-Term Ranibizumab Treatment in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Belgian Subanalysis from the Global Real-World LUMINOUSTM Study

Purpose

To evaluate long-term, real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of ranibizumab 0.5 mg for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in a Belgian cohort.

Patients and Methods

This Belgian (BE) cohort of the 5-year global observational LUMINOUS study included 229 patients with nAMD. Outcomes included visual acuity (VA), central retinal thickness (CRT) and safety.

Results

The mean age was 79.5±7.7 years. The majority of patients (67.7%) were female and all patients were Caucasian. Most patients previously received ranibizumab with only 17.5% of patients being treatment-naïve. The injection frequency declined over time irrespective of prior treatment status (p<0.0001), with treatment-naïve eyes receiving a mean of 4.2±2.9 yearly injections and prior-ranibizumab eyes 3.6±2.7. Regression analysis confirmed first-year VA increases for treatment-naïve eyes (p=0.002) followed by a slight decrease of -1.8 letters per year. For prior-ranibizumab eyes, the visual changes over 1 year were statistically non-significant (p=0.90) but declined slightly after year one (p<0.0001). Anatomically, the CRT of treatment-naïve eyes decreased over time from baseline (p<0.0001), whereas the CRT of prior-ranibizumab eyes remained stable (p=0.43). No new safety findings were identified.

Conclusion

LUMINOUS-BE reconfirms the well-characterized benefit-risk profile of ranibizumab for nAMD treatment. The observed low injection frequency reflects a need for more rigorous treatment in real-world settings.

Clinical Trial Registration

NCT01318941.

Long-Term Follow-up of Patients with Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treated with Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections

PURPOSE

To determine the long-term visual outcomes and intravitreal injection burden of patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) treated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with exudative AMD treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections with annual office visits for at least 7 years.

METHODS

Snellen visual acuity was measured at baseline and then annually until the last year of follow-up. The number of injections was recorded on an annual basis during each year of follow-up.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The change in the frequency of injections over time along with the change in visual acuity each year from the baseline visit through 7 years.

RESULTS

During this period, 533 eyes of 429 patients were treated for exudative AMD. Of these, 391 eyes (73%) met the inclusion criteria of annual office visits and received a mean of 5.8 ± 2.5 intravitreal injections per year. The baseline mean visual acuity was 0.6 ± 0.5 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; Snellen equivalent, 20/80), and the 7-year visual acuity was 0.8 ± 0.6 logMAR (Snellen equivalent, 20/126; P < 0.0001). When compared with the 142 eyes that did not undergo an office visit for a continuous 12-month period, eyes with annual office visits showed similar baseline mean visual acuity (0.7 logMAR vs. 0.6 logMAR; P = 0.2102), but more injections per year (P < 0.0001). Of the 533 total eyes, 124 eyes (23%) maintained better than 20/40 visual acuity at 7 years. These eyes received more injections overall per year (6.5 vs. 5.5 injections per year; P = 0.0007).

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-world setting, eyes that maintained consistent, long-term follow-up received significantly more intravitreal injections per year than eyes with inconsistent follow-up. Eyes with 20/40 or better vision at study conclusion received more injections per year than eyes with worse than 20/40 vision.

Noncompliance in Prospective Retina Clinical Trials: Analysis of Factors Predicting Loss to Follow-up

PURPOSE

Noncompliance during prospective studies can bias results and limit conclusions. The current study retrospectively investigated the relationship between study subject characteristics and rates of noncompliance in interventional trials involving common causes of blindness.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of 10 randomized clinical trials.

METHODS

Subjects were enrolled in investigator-initiated trials studying proliferative diabetic retinopathy, neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, and retinal venous occlusive disease. Records were reviewed for hypothesized risk factors of noncompliance and rates of noncompliance, which were defined as at least 1 missed visit or exiting the study early. Demographic information, systemic medical history, and ocular medical history, including visual acuity and central retinal thicknesses, were examined retrospectively using Student t test, Pearson χ² test, and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 390 subjects included, 212 (54.4%) were compliant with all scheduled study visits and 178 (45.6%) met criteria for noncompliance, with 53 (13.6%) subjects exiting early. Regression models identified 17 variables that were significant in determining subject noncompliance. Among those, distance, comorbidities, diabetic status, concomitant medications, previous clinic visits, length of study, disease under study, and severe adverse events were highly significant risk factors of noncompliance.

CONCLUSION

The current research identified a substantial proportion of subjects who met the criteria for noncompliance within the trials analyzed. The factors identified in the current work are consistent with published clinical observations and the results of previous clinical trials. These results highlight the importance of considering study design and medical history when designing prospective clinical trials in an attempt to minimize data loss.

Outcomes of Eyes Lost to Follow-up with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Receiving Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor

PURPOSE

To determine outcomes of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) receiving intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections who return after a period of being lost to follow-up (LTFU).

DESIGN

Retrospective, cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

Eyes that received intravitreal bevacizumab, ranibizumab, or aflibercept for nAMD and were LTFU for >6 months.

METHODS

Comparison of visual outcomes and structural parameters at the visit before LTFU, return visit, and final visit.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity (VA), presence of subretinal fluid and intraretinal fluid, and central foveal thickness (CFT) by OCT.

RESULTS

A total of 93 eyes of 77 patients were included in the analysis. Mean duration from date of LTFU to return was 346 (±122) days. Overall, 53.7% of patients had worse median logMAR VA by the final visit. Median logMAR VA worsened from 0.60 (0.40-2.00) (Snellen 20/80 [20/50-20/2000]) at the visit before LTFU to 1.00 (0.48-2.00) (20/200 [20/60-20/2000]) at the return visit (P < 0.001). Median logMAR VA remained worse at 6- and 12-months after return from LTFU: 1.00 (0.48-2.00) (20/200 [20/60-20/2000]) (P = 0.001) and 0.70 (0.44-1.30) (20/100 [20/55-20/399]) (P = 0.004), respectively. Despite a mean of 383 (±270) days of follow-up after returning and 5.0 (±5.1) additional injections, the median logMAR VA remained worse at 1.00 (0.54-2.00) (20/200 [20/70-20/2000]) at the final visit compared with the visit before LTFU (P < 0.001). There was greater worsening in mean logMAR VA from the visit before LTFU to the final visit in eyes that received bevacizumab (0.32) and ranibizumab (0.28) compared with aflibercept (P = 0.003, P = 0.04, and P = 0.03, respectively). Mean CFT increased from 201 (±106) μm at the visit before LTFU to 240 (±147) μm at return (P = 0.004). By the final visit, the mean CFT had decreased to 183 (±101) μm, which was not significantly different from the visit before LTFU (P = 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Eyes with nAMD receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF that were LTFU experience significant VA decline at the return visit that persists on final follow-up despite normalization of CFT.

Treatment compliance and adherence among patients with diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration treated by anti-vascular endothelial growth factor under universal health coverage

PURPOSE

To analyze and compare loss to follow-up (LTFU) rates between patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) and those with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in patients, receiving treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), under universal health coverage.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the relevant data of 1264 patients receiving anti-VEGF therapy, in this cohort study. The observation period ranged from September 01, 2015 to December 31, 2018. Intervals between each procedure and the subsequent follow-up examination were measured. Demographic data, visual acuity (VA), the type of transport for treatment access, and distance between the residence and clinic were evaluated as risk factors for LTFU.

RESULTS

We collected data for 841 patients with nAMD (age, 81.0 (± 8.1 years)) and 423 patients with DR (age, 67.7 (± 12.1 years)). The rate of LTFU, for at least 6 months, was 28.8% and 2.9% for patients with DR and nAMD, respectively (p < 0.001). In the DR group, 18.9% patients were lost to follow-up exceeding > 12 months. Multivariate regression analysis showed that advanced age, lack of mobility, and need for assisted transport, poor final VA despite treatment, and decrease in vision during the observational period were independent risk factors for LTFU exceeding 12 months (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We found a high long-term LTFU rate for patients with DR, despite treatment under universal health coverage. Considering the risk of disease progression, particularly in patients with chronic DR, strategies for better compliance and adherence to therapy should be considered for optimized patient care.