Chemoradiation with or without intraoperative radiation therapy in patients with locally recurrent rectal carcinoma: prognostic factors and long term outcome

Surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer after curative resection represents a difficult clinical problem and a surgical challenge. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of a series of patients who underwent resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer with curative intent.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 64 patients who underwent surgical exploration with a view to cure for locally recurrent rectal cancer under the care of one surgeon between April 1997 and April 2004. Details were obtained on the primary tumor and the operation, the indication for investigation of recurrence, preoperative imaging, operative findings, morbidity and mortality, and histopathology.

RESULTS

The median time interval between resection of primary tumor and surgery for locally recurrent disease was 31 (interquartile range, 21 to 48) months. Twenty-three patients had central disease, 10 patients had sacral involvement, 21 patients had pelvic sidewall involvement, and 10 patients had both sacral and sidewall involvement. Fifty-seven patients underwent resection of the tumor. Thirty-nine of the 57 patients underwent wide resection (abdominoperineal excision of rectum, anterior resection, or Hartmann's procedure) whereas 18 patients (31.6 percent) required radical resection (pelvic exenteration or sacrectomy). Curative, negative resection margins were obtained in 21 of 57 patients who had tumor excision (36.8 percent). Perioperative mortality was 1.6 percent. Significant postoperative morbidity occurred in 40 percent of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has shown that a significant proportion of patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer can undergo resection with negative margins.

Preoperative radiotherapy improves outcome in recurrent rectal cancer

PURPOSE

When local recurrent rectal cancer is diagnosed without signs of metastases, a potentially curative resection can be performed. This study was designed to compare the results of preoperative radiotherapy followed by surgery with surgery only.

METHODS

Between 1985 and 2003, 117 patients with recurrent rectal cancer were prospectively entered in our database. Ninety-two patients were suitable for resection with curative intent. Preoperative radiation with a median dosage of 50 Gy was performed in 59 patients; 33 patients did not receive preoperative radiotherapy. The median age of the patients was respectively 66 and 62 years.

RESULTS

The median follow-up of patients alive for the total group was 16 (range, 4-156) months. Tumor characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Complete resections were performed in 64 percent of the patients who received preoperative radiation and 45 percent of the nonirradiated patients. A complete response after radiotherapy was found in 10 percent of the preoperative irradiated patients (n = 6). There were no differences in morbidity and reintervention rate between the two groups. Local control after preoperative radiotherapy was statistically significantly higher after three and five years (P = 0.036). Overall survival and metastases-free survival were not different in both groups. Complete response to preoperative radiotherapy was predictive for an improved survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative radiotherapy for recurrent rectal cancer results in a higher number of complete resections and an improved local control compared with patients treated without radiotherapy. Preoperative radiotherapy should be standard treatment for patients with recurrent rectal cancer.

Colon cancer

Colon cancer is one of the leading tumours in the world and is considered among the big killers, together with lung, prostate and breast cancer. In the recent years very important advances occurred in the field of treatment of this frequent disease: adjuvant chemotherapy was demonstrated to be effective, chiefly in stage III patients, and surgery was optimized in order to achieve the best results with a low morbidity. Several new target-oriented drugs are under evaluation and some of them (cetuximab and bevacizumab) have already exhibited a good activity/efficacy, mainly in combination with chemotherapy. The development of updated recommendations for the best management of these patients is crucial in order to obtain the best results, not only in clinical research but also in everyday practice. This report summarizes the most important achievements in this field and provides the readers useful suggestions for their professional practice.

Treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer, results and prognostic factors

PURPOSE

Assessment of the results and prognostic factors in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer treated with curative intent.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty patients with an isolated pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer were studied retrospectively. The treatment consisted of radiotherapy alone or combined with chemotherapy and/or surgery performed between January 1992 and July 2001. Radiotherapy was given with a 3-4 fields technique (6-15 MV), five times a week. The median radiation dose was 50 Gy (range 25-66.6 Gy). Twenty-five patients underwent salvage surgery. Five patients were treated with concomitant chemotherapy (5-fluoro-uracil/leucovorin) (5FU/LV) during the 1st and 5th week of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Twenty-two of the 40 patients were male. The local recurrence free survival after 3 and 5 years, respectively, was 49 and 39%. Male gender was the only independent factor associated with failure of local control. The 3 and 5-year overall survival of the total group was 36 and 19%, respectively, with a median survival of 26 months.

CONCLUSION

In a selection of patients in the treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer valuable local palliation if not cure, can be reached. A multimodality approach seems to offer the best chances in this threatening situation.

Clinical nature and prognosis of locally recurrent rectal cancer after total mesorectal excision with or without preoperative radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To document the clinical nature and prognosis of locally recurrent rectal cancer after total mesorectal excision (TME) with or without 5 x 5 Gy preoperative radiotherapy (PRT) and to identify patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors associated with differences in prognosis after local recurrence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

For 96 Dutch patients with a local recurrence who participated in a multicenter randomized clinical trial, data on treatments and follow-up were gathered from surgeons and radiation and medical oncologists. Twenty-three patients (24%) had previously been treated with PRT plus TME, and 73 patients (76%) had been treated with TME alone. Eighty-one patients (84%) were followed until death; median follow-up time of the alive patients after local recurrence was 21 months (range, 5 to 48 months).

RESULTS

Survival after local recurrence in the PRT + TME group was significantly shorter than in the TME group (median survival, 6.1 v 15.9 months; hazard ratio for death, 2.1; P =.008). Patients with a local recurrence in the PRT + TME group had distant metastases more often (74% v 40%; P =.004), underwent surgical resection of local recurrence less often (17% v 35%; P =.11), and received radiotherapy for local recurrence at a total dose >/= 45 Gy less often (4% v 42%; P =.001) than patients without PRT. In a multivariate analysis, the difference in survival after local recurrence between randomization groups was no longer statistically significant (hazard ratio for death of PRT, 1.53; P =.16).

CONCLUSION

The clinical nature and prognosis of patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer has changed since the introduction of PRT. The majority of patients who present with a local recurrence after previous PRT have simultaneous distant metastases, and median survival has decreased to 6 months.

Colorectal cancer pelvic recurrences: determinants of resectability

PURPOSE

This study was designed to identify preoperative and intraoperative features of locally recurrent colorectal cancer that predict R0 resection in patients scheduled for attempted complete resection followed by intraoperative radiation therapy.

METHODS

Review of a prospective data base identified 119 patients brought to the intraoperative radiation therapy suite for planned complete resection of locally recurrent rectal (n = 101) and colon (n = 18) cancer between January 1994 and November 2000. R0 resection was achieved in 61 patients. This group was compared with patients in which an R1 (n = 38), R2 (n = 7), or palliative procedure (n = 13) was performed. Variables evaluated included: tumor location, features of the primary tumor, and preoperative findings on computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and history/physical. Tumor location was established by review of operative/pathologic reports and classified as axial (anastomotic/perineal), anterior (bladder/genitourinary organs), posterior (presacral), or lateral (pelvic sidewall).

RESULTS

When recurrence was confined to the axial location only, or axial and anterior locations, R0 resection was achieved significantly more often than when other locations were involved (P < 0.001, P = 0.003, respectively). When a lateral component was present, R0 resection was achieved significantly less often than when there was no lateral component (P = 0.002). For patients with available preoperative computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging results (n = 70), the finding of lateral tumor involvement was associated with R0 resection significantly less often than when lateral disease was not identified (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Pelvic recurrences confined to the axial location, or axial and anterior locations, are more likely to be completely resectable (R0) than those involving the pelvic sidewall. Efforts to enhance preoperative identification and imaging of these patients are clearly justified.

A study of radiotherapy modalities combined with continuous 5-FU infusion for locally advanced gastrointestinal malignancies

AIM

We describe the feasibility of combining infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT).

METHODS

Patients with surgically resectable locally advanced gastrointestinal cancers were treated concurrently during surgery with IORT and a 72 h infusion of 5-FU. Patients without previous external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) were subsequently treated with EBRT (40-50Gy) concurrent with a 21-day continuous infusion of 5-FU. Pancreatic, gastric, duodenal, ampullary, recurrent colorectal, and recurrent anal cancer were included.

RESULTS

During IORT/5-FU, no chemotherapy-related grade III or IV hematologic or gastrointestinal toxicity was noted. Post-surgical recovery or wound healing was not affected. One of nine patients who received post-operative radiation required a treatment break. During follow-up, there were more complications in patients with pelvic tumours, especially those with previous radiation. Nine patients have had local and/or local regional recurrences, two of these in the IORT field.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with a combination of IORT and 5-FU followed by EBRT and 5-FU is feasible. However, long-term complications may be increased in previously irradiated recurrent pelvic tumours.

Intraoperative radiotherapy in the multimodality approach to colorectal cancer

The addition of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) to the multimodality approach for the treatment of locally advanced and locally recurrent colorectal cancer seems to result in improvements in local control and long-term survival. Local control and survival are most likely in patients in whom a gross total resection is accomplished. Peripheral nerve is the dose-limiting structure for patients treated with IORT. Further improvements in local control require the addition of dose modifiers during external beam radiotherapy or IORT. Distant relapse remains problematic, and effective systemic therapy is necessary to significantly improve long-term survival.

Transsacral exenteration of fixed primary and recurrent anorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Posteriorly fixed anorectal cancer is often considered incurable, but may be resectable using transsacral approaches.

METHODS

We reviewed 45 patients undergoing transsacral exenteration for this problem since 1983 to determine outcome of such surgery.

RESULTS

The group consisted of 38 men and 7 women; 17 had primary tumors, 28 had recurrent cancer: local excision, 1; low anterior resection, 11; or abdominoperineal resection, 16. Thirty-nine had prior XRT. Operative mortality was 4%. Severe pain was relieved in 16 of 22 (72%) patients. Crude recurrence rates are local 22%, local plus distant 11%, distant 16%. Five-year disease-free survival is 31% for primary disease, 32% for recurrence. Median survival is abdominoperineal resection recurrence, 24 months; primary cancer, 30 months; low anterior resection recurrence, 37 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Transsacral exenteration relieved pain in 70% of patients with fixed anorectal cancer, and led to long-term survival in 31% to 32%. Prognosis trended toward benefit for recurrence after low anterior resection.

Multimodality management of locally recurrent colorectal cancer

The combined management of locally recurrent colorectal cancer shows considerable promise, but the best way to incorporate the different treatment modalities and the potential benefits remain uncertain. The case series mentioned here were derived from highly selected groups from a much larger population of patients with recurrent disease; thus fully combined management may be only appropriate for a minority of people with recurrent disease. There is a need for multicenter randomized trials to better delineate the real benefits from the combined approach. Multimodality management of recurrent colorectal cancer, however, involves more than the combination of surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy for a select minority of resectable patients. It involves the use of each modality to its greatest advantage for all patients, as determined by a multidisciplinary team of specialists. We should also not confine our attention to the treatment aspects of recurrent disease alone, as the greatest promise for improved survival could be with a more general application of total mesorectal excision. Because most people who develop local recurrence of colorectal cancer will die from their disease, the main contribution of a multimodality approach may be towards palliation.

Intraoperative radiation therapy for patients with recurrent rectal and sigmoid colon cancer in previously irradiated fields

A retrospective study evaluated 15 patients with pelvic recurrence of colorectal cancer in a previously irradiated region who received intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) as part of salvage therapy. Total prior external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) doses ranged from 45 to 79.2 Gy. Tumor resection was accomplished in 14 patients, with an exenteration performed in seven. IORT dose was 15-20 Gy. Three patients received additional EBRT as a post-operative course of 25.2 Gy in 14 fractions. Actuarial 3-year local control rate was 25%. The 3-year overall survival rate was 29%. Patients with fixed and/or bulky pelvic tumors had a local control rate of 19% at 12 months and median overall survival of 9 months. Patients with less extensive clinical presentations of anastomotic non-fixed transmural recurrence, isolated pelvic node metastasis and rectal recurrence following local excision had a local control rate of 42% at 36 months and median survival of 43 months. We conclude that clinical presentation of recurrent disease is an important prognostic factor. The value of IORT may be limited to patients with less extensive clinical presentations.

Chemoradiation instead of surgery to treat mid and low rectal tumors: is it safe?

BACKGROUND

The main treatment for rectal carcinoma is surgery. Preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) is advocated to reduce local recurrence and improve resection of mid and low tethered rectal tumors.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients with mid or low rectal tumors underwent CRT (external beam radiation plus 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid). Patients who had low rectal tumors with complete response (CR) were not submitted to surgical treatment. All other patients were submitted to surgery, independently of the response. Mean follow-up was 32.1 months.

RESULTS

Five-year overall survival was 60.5%. Clinical evaluation after CRT showed CR in 10 cases (19.2%), all low tumors; incomplete response (>50%) in 21 (40.4%); and no response (<50%) in 19 (36.6%). Among the 10 cases with CR, 8 presented with local recurrence within 3.7 to 8.8 months. Two patients were not submitted to surgery and are still alive without cancer after 37 and 58 months. Thirty-nine patients had radical surgery. Seven had local recurrences after CRT plus surgery (17.9%). Overall survival was negatively affected by lymph node metastases (P =.017) and perineural invasion (P =.026).

CONCLUSIONS

Exclusive CRT approach is not safe to treat patients with low infiltrative rectal carcinoma.

Intraoperative radiotherapy: current thinking

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) refers to the delivery of irradiation at surgery. A large single dose of irradiation is delivered to a surgically defined area, while uninvolved and dose-limiting tissues are displaced, the final goal of IORT being enhanced locoregional tumour control. IORT is used in most modern protocol studies as a boost radiation component of multidisciplinary treatment approaches. More recently, high activity radiation sources or mobile operating room treatment machines are used to facilitate the IORT procedure. Clinical experiences have shown that IORT may improve local control and disease-free survival, especially when used in adjuvant setting, combined with external beam irradiation in some neoplasms such as cancer of the stomach, pancreas, colorectum, and soft tissue sarcoma.

Patterns of pelvic invasion are prognostic in the treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Local recurrence of rectal cancer after curative resection remains a difficult clinical problem. The aim of this study was to elucidate prognostic risk factors after resection of recurrent cancer.

METHODS

Between January 1983 and December 1999, 83 patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer were studied retrospectively for survival benefit by re-resection. Sixty patients underwent resection for recurrent cancer, including total pelvic exenteration in 30 patients and sacrectomy in 23 patients. The extent of locally recurrent tumour was classified by the pattern of pelvic invasion as follows: localized, sacral invasion and lateral invasion.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis showed that the pattern of pelvic invasion was a significant prognostic factor which independently influenced survival after resection of recurrent cancer (P < 0.001). The 5-year survival rates were 38 per cent in the localized type (n = 27), 10 per cent in the sacral invasive type (n = 16) and zero in the lateral invasive type (n = 17).

CONCLUSION

Resection for locally recurrent rectal cancer is potentially curative in patients with localized or sacral invasive patterns of recurrence. Alternatives should be explored in patients with recurrence involving the lateral pelvic wall.