Diagnosis, management, and survival of patients with leptomeningeal cancer based on cerebrospinal fluid-flow status

Biology and therapy of neoplastic meningitis

Neoplastic meningitis (NM) occurs in 5% to 8% of cancer patients, commonly as an end-stage process in previously metastatic disease. As newer therapeutics extend patient survival by maintaining long-term control of systemic malignancies, the incidence of NM is likely to rise. This can be expected both because of a change in the natural history of the underlying disease and the generally poor penetrance of many newer anticancer drugs into the central nervous system, thereby creating a sanctuary site for malignant cells. Currently available treatments have provided limited benefit in overall survival in NM, although long-term survival does occur. Because of the morbidity occasionally associated with treatment, prognostic indicators are being analyzed to identify patients who may benefit from systemic and/or intrathecal therapy before making the decision to initiate treatment. Additionally, because of the relative insensitivity of traditional cerebrospinal fluid analysis, new markers of NM are being investigated. This endeavor is being aided by ongoing research into the underlying biology of the metastatic process.

Neurologic complications of cancer and its treatment

The central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS) are very susceptible to cancer and its treatment. The most direct involvement of the nervous system manifests in the development of primary brain and spinal cord tumors. Many cancers exhibit a propensity toward spread to the CNS, and brain metastases are common problems seen in malignancies such as lung, breast, and melanoma. Such spread may involve the brain or spine parenchyma or the subarachnoid space. In the PNS, spread is usually through direct infiltration of nerve roots, plexi, or muscle by neighboring malignancies. In some cases, cancer has sudden, devastating effects on the nervous system: epidural spinal cord compression or cord transection from pathologic fractures of vertebra involved by cancer; increased intracranial pressure from intracranial mass lesion growth and edema; and uncontrolled seizure activity as a result of intracranial tumors (status epilepticus), which are neuro-oncologic emergencies. The best known indirect or remote effects of cancer on the nervous system are the neurologic paraneoplastic syndromes. Cancer can also result in a hypercoagulable state causing cerebrovascular complications. Treatment of cancer can have neurologic complications. The commonest of these complications are radiation-induced injury to the brain, spine, and peripheral nerves and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. The suppressant effect of cancer and its treatment on the body's immune system can result in infectious complications within the nervous system.

Intrathecal chemotherapy for treatment of leptomeningeal dissemination of metastatic tumours

Neoplastic meningitis consists of diffuse involvement of the leptomeninges by infiltrating cancer cells, and can be caused by systemic or primary CNS tumours, such as solid cancers or lymphoproliferative malignant disease. Neoplastic meningitis is characterised by multifocal neurological signs and symptoms. Thus, careful neurological examination is needed for diagnosis of secondary diffuse involvement. Survival of patients with neoplastic meningitis is short (3-4 months), although some patients have long-lasting remission. Because most patients with neoplastic meningitis have diffuse systemic disease, treatment is typically palliative. However, more aggressive treatments are available to low-risk patients, which could increase survival. Therefore, identification of low-risk patients is important. Intrathecal chemotherapy is currently the main treatment for patients with neoplastic meningitis, but optimum anticancer chemotherapy is being studied.

Carcinomatous Meningitis from Unknown Primary Carcinoma

Carcinomatous meningitis (CM) occurs in 3 to 8% of cancer patients. Patients present with a focal symptom, and multifocal signs are often found following neurological examination. The gold standard for diagnosis remains the demonstration of carcinomatous cells in the cerebrospinal fluid on cytopathological examination. Despite the poor prognosis, palliative treatment could improve quality of life and, in some cases, overall survival. We report on a patient who presented with vertigo, tinnitus and left-sided hearing loss followed by progressive diffuse facial nerve paralysis. Lumbar cerebrospinal fluid confirmed the diagnosis of CM. However, no primary tumor was discovered, even after multiple invasive investigations. This is the first reported case in the English-language medical literature of CM resulting from a carcinoma of unknown primary origin.

Treatment modalities for leptomeningeal metastases

Secondary involvement of the leptomeninges represents an infrequent but devastating (and nearly always fatal) complication of solid tumors, hematologic malignancies (both leukemia and lymphoma), and primary brain tumors. Clinical suspicion of neoplastic meningitis (NM) may be raised by the appearance of multivariate neurological symptoms; however, a definitive diagnosis is often difficult to obtain. Improved treatments for primary malignancies and advances in diagnostic imaging technology have led to an apparent increase in the number of patients diagnosed with NM. Unfortunately, therapeutic options remain limited, particularly for patients with chemoresistant tumors. Optimized treatment remains controversial and may rely upon a combination of chemotherapy (intrathecal and/or intravenous) and concurrent focal radiotherapy. This review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of intra-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) versus systemic strategies for treating NM. Clinical trial evidence is presented for the different treatment modalities. In addition, the therapeutic potential of intra-CSF therapy for cancer prophylaxis is discussed. Earlier diagnosis and more aggressive preventive treatment regimens may provide substantial increases in survival and favorably affect quality of life. Additional data from large-scale, well-controlled trials are required to more accurately assess the efficacy of intra-CSF versus systemic treatment in NM. Future treatment options using novel targets for intra-CSF therapy will be addressed as well.

Comparison of 2-Methoxyestradiol and Methotrexate Effects on Non-Hodgkin's B-Cell Lymphoma

PURPOSE

Methotrexate (MTX) is the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agent to treat primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and intraocular lymphoma (IOL). 2-methoxyestradiol (2ME2) is a potent antitumor and anti-angiogenesis agent which, unlike other cytotoxic drugs, has minimal toxicity. In this study, anti-proliferative, apoptotic, and cell-cycle effects of 2ME2 and MTX were compared to evaluate 2ME2 efficacy in human lymphoma cells, models for non-Hodgkin B cell lymphomas.

METHODS

The cells were cultured and incubated with varying concentrations of 2ME2 or MTX. A tetrazolium-based colorimetric assay was used to quantify the anti-proliferative effects of 2ME2 and MTX using a microplate reader. To detect apoptotic and cell cycle distribution changes induced by 2ME2 and MTX, the cells were stained with Annexin V-FITC and/or propidium iodide (PI) and analyzed by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Lymphoma cell proliferation was inhibited by 50% at concentrations ranging from 0.4 to 1 microM for 2ME2 and 0.06 to 0.2 microM for MTX. Induction of apoptosis by 2ME2 and MTX was observed in the tested cells. 2ME2 was a G2/M-phase specific blocker whereas MTX was an S-phase specific blocker in cell cycle analyses. At 1 microM concentration, 2ME2 and MTX showed similar anti-proliferative effect on the lymphoma cell lines. In previously reported studies, for normal endothelial cells, 1 microM 2ME2 showed no appreciable toxicity, while MTX at this same concentration exhibited significant cytotoxicity. 2ME2 at a therapeutic target concentration of 1 mu M may be an effective and relatively non-toxic drug for the treatment of PCNSL with IOL.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study of the effect of 2ME2 and MTX on anti-proliferation, apoptosis, and cell cycling suggests that 2ME2 is a potential agent for treating PCNSL and IOL.

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis: prognostic implications of clinical and cerebrospinal fluid features

BACKGROUND

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) represents a devastating complication of systemic cancer, and patients with LC have a dismal prognosis and increased mortality. The few studies that have focused on the evaluation of prognostic factors in patients with LC have resulted in contradictory results. Thus, the treatment of LC remains controversial, and no straightforward guidelines exist in the literature. The objective of the current study was to identify prognostic markers related to LC survival to better select patients who are eligible for intensive treatment.

METHODS

Seventy patients who had a diagnosis of LC were reviewed, and clinical data, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) parameters, tumor-related characteristics, and treatment information were registered. The impact of single parameters on overall survival was determined by both univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The multivariate analysis revealed that Radiation Therapy Oncology Group score<or=2 (P=.028), a glucose level in CSF>or=2.7 mmol/L (P=.001), the presence of infratentorial symptoms at onset (P=.026), and intrathecal treatment (P<.001) were associated independently with longer overall survival in patients with LC. In addition, the same clinical factors also predicted response to treatment in such patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The predictive factors for patients with LC that were identified in this study could help to better select patients who are more likely to benefit from chemotherapy.

Leptomeningeal neoplasms

Leptomeningeal metastasis is becoming an increasingly important late complication of cancer as survival from systemic disease increases, and due to the fact that many novel cancer drugs fail to achieve therapeutic concentrations in the central nervous system. It occurs when neoplastic cells enter cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pathways, causing diffuse infiltration of the subarachnoid space of the brain and spinal cord. Definitive diagnosis is established by the demonstration of malignant cells in the CSF. However, in certain circumstances the presence of leptomeningeal enhancement on brain or spinal MRI may be sufficient to make the diagnosis. Early diagnosis and aggressive treatment may delay neurologic progression and can lead to prolonged survival and improvement of neurologic function in certain patients. The prognosis depends on the underlying malignancy but is often poor, with a median survival of 4 months, and most treatment interventions are palliative. Nevertheless, some patients respond to treatment, and some survive beyond 1 or 2 years after diagnosis. Areas of radiographic bulky disease or symptomatic tumor should receive radiotherapy. Intrathecal chemotherapy is most effective in patients with lymphoma, leukemia, or breast cancer and without evidence of bulky disease on neuroimaging. Intrathecal chemotherapy requires normal CSF flow, and the most commonly used agents are methotrexate, cytarabine, and thiotepa. In lieu of intrathecal therapy, systemic chemotherapy may occasionally be indicated in select patients in part based on its ability to penetrate into bulky disease. When hydrocephalus occurs, ventriculoperitoneal shunting frequently leads to rapid clinical improvement. There is hope that progress in diagnostic modalities and the development of more effective intrathecal antineoplastic drugs may decrease neurologic morbidity and improve quality of life and survival.

Treatment of central nervous system metastases: parenchymal, epidural, and leptomeningeal

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With prolonged survival from systemic therapies in the adjuvant and salvage setting, and because these agents cannot cross the intact blood-brain barrier, central nervous system metastases are becoming a therapeutic challenge in oncology.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent therapeutic achievements include an extended use of surgery and radiosurgery. Although each of these treatment modalities has its own indications, in patients eligible for both treatments the upfront comparison of these two techniques has not been performed yet. Systemic chemotherapies and biotherapies may be effective in the management of central nervous system metastases as they may act on both neurologic and extra-central nervous system lesions. In the treatment of epidural metastases, a surgical procedure providing immediate direct circumferential decompression of the spinal cord followed by local irradiation has been demonstrated in a prospective randomized trial. The management of leptomeningeal metastases remains controversial and of limited efficacy especially in chemoresistant tumours and still relies on the combination of chemotherapy (intrathecal and intravenous) and focal radiotherapy.

SUMMARY

Aggressive treatments in patients with early diagnosis and in whom central nervous system metastases are the life-threatening location may provide a substantial increase in survival and favourably affect quality of life.

Leptomeningeal disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common lymphoproliferative disorder in the western hemisphere, with an annual incidence of 3:100000. Commonly patients are asymptomatic but not rarely disease progression occurs in the setting of lymphadenopathy and extensive leukemic burden. Leptomeningeal involvement in patients with CLL is infrequent, with presenting symptoms of headache (23%), acute or chronic changes in mental status (28%), cranial nerve abnormalities (54%) including optic neuropathy (28%), weakness of lower extremities (23%) and cerebellar signs (18%). In this report, we discuss a CLL patient with leptomeningeal involvement, who presented with neurological symptoms as the first clinical sign, and a diagnosis of leptomeningeal was made based on CSF cytology and flow cytometry. Treatment consisted of radiation therapy and intrathecal chemotherapy with arabinoside-cytosine and systemic chemotherapy. On the basis of this patient-report together with 37 other previously reported cases, the clinical characteristics together with treatment options and outcome of leptomeningeal involvement in CLL are reviewed. Our case together with data from the literature indicate that a timely diagnosis and intensive treatment of leptomeningeal disease of CLL may lead to longstanding and complete resolution of neurological symptoms.

CNS complications of breast cancer: current and emerging treatment options

In general, the development of CNS metastases of breast cancer depends on several prognostic factors, including younger age and a negative hormone receptor status. Also, the presence of a breast cancer 1, early onset (BRCA1) germline mutation and expression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2/neu) proto-oncogene seem to contribute to an increased rate of development of CNS metastases. The choice of appropriate therapy for brain metastases also depends on prognostic factors, including the age of the patient, the Karnofsky performance score, the number of brain metastases and the presence of systemic disease. Surgery followed by whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is generally restricted to ambulant patients with a single brain metastasis without active extracranial disease. In patients who have two to four metastases, stereotactic focal radiotherapy (i.e. radiosurgery) with or without WBRT is usually indicated. In the remainder of patients, WBRT alone provides adequate palliation. Although breast carcinoma is sensitive to chemotherapy, the role of chemotherapy in the treatment of brain metastases is still unclear. Objective responses after cyclophosphamide-based therapies were reported in studies performed in the 1980s. Subgroup analysis of data from a randomised study indicates that survival may improve if WBRT is combined with the radiosensitiser efaproxiral. Interestingly, the Her2/neu antibody trastuzumab, which does not cross the blood-brain barrier, produces systemic responses and enhanced survival, without a clear effect on brain metastases. Breast cancer constitutes the most common solid primary tumour leading to leptomeningeal disease. Clinical symptoms such as cranial nerve dysfunction or a cauda equina syndrome can be treated with local radiotherapy. A randomised study in patients with leptomeningeal disease secondary to breast cancer has revealed that intrathecal chemotherapy is associated with substantially more adverse effects than non-intrathecal treatment, without a clear benefit in terms of response or survival. Intramedullary metastasis is rare but often presents with a rapidly progressive myelopathy. Local radiotherapy may preserve neurological function. Epidural spinal cord metastasis occurs in approximately 4% of patients and can lead to paraplegia. A randomised study has shown that surgical intervention together with local radiotherapy is superior to local radiotherapy alone.

Chemotherapy and cerebral metastases: misperception or reality?

Cerebral metastases remain a common complication among patients with cancer. Surgery and radiotherapy remain the principal therapeutic interventions. In contrast, the benefit of chemotherapy has long been viewed with skepticism. Nonetheless, as survival in cancer patients improves and the incidence of cerebral metastases increases, so does the demand for effective therapies. It is now recognized that the blood-brain barrier within metastases is permeable and thus allows entry of otherwise excluded drugs. Limited data have suggested that cerebral metastases have modest sensitivity to chemotherapy. Furthermore, novel agents and delivery strategies have been developed to facilitate central nervous system penetration. Nonetheless, data are limited by methodological flaws, including heterogeneous inclusion criteria, small sample sizes, lack of randomization, and inconsistencies in defined end points and response assessment criteria. Well-designed clinical trials are needed to address the effect of chemotherapy. Acceptable control arms must be established to measure the effect of chemotherapies. Standardized response criteria and disease-specific studies are essential.

Lymphomatous meningitis in primary central nervous system lymphoma

✓Lymphomatous meningitis (LM) due to primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma is an uncommon problem in neurooncology and can occur at time of diagnosis or recurrence. Notwithstanding frequent focal signs and symptoms, LM is a disease affecting the entire neuraxis, and therefore staging and treatment need to encompass all cere-brospinal fluid (CSF) compartments. Central nervous system staging of LM includes contrast agent–enhanced cranial computed tomography (CT) or Gd-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, Gd-enhanced spinal MR imaging, CT myelography, and radionuclide CSF flow study. Treatment of LM includes involved-field radiotherapy of bulky or symptomatic disease sites and intra-CSF drug therapy. The inclusion of concomitant systemic therapy can benefit patients with LM and can obviate the need for intra-CSF chemotherapy. At present, intra-CSF drug therapy is confined to three chemotherapeutic agents (methotrexate, cytosine arabinoside, and thiotepa) administered by a variety of schedules either by intralumbar or intraventricular drug delivery. Although treatment of LM is palliative and the expected median survival of patients is 4 to 6 months, it often provides stabilization and protection from further neurological deterioration. In patients with primary CNS lymphoma, CNS prophylaxis has been recommended (using a combination of high-dose systemic chemotherapy and intra-CSF chemotherapy), but the strategy remains controversial because high-dose systemic methotrexate is commonly used as an adjuvant therapy. Patients with primary CNS lymphoma at high risk as defined by positive CSF cytology or neuroradiography consistent with LM may benefit from the inclusion of intra-CSF chemotherapy.

Neoplastic meningitis

BACKGROUND

Neoplastic meningitis (NM) is a common problem in neuro-oncology, occurring in approximately 5% of all patients with cancer.

REVIEW SUMMARY

Notwithstanding frequent focal signs and symptoms in NM, NM is a disease affecting the entire neuraxis, and therefore staging and treatment need encompass all cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compartments.

RESULTS

Central nervous system (CNS) staging of NM includes contrast-enhanced cranial computed tomography (CE-CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MR-Gd), contrast-enhanced spine magnetic resonance imaging (MR-S) or computed tomographic myelography (CT-M), and radionuclide CSF flow study (FS). Treatment of NM incorporates involved-field radiotherapy of bulky or symptomatic disease sites and intra-CSF drug therapy. The inclusion of concomitant systemic therapy may benefit patients with NM and may obviate the need for intra-CSF chemotherapy. At present, intra-CSF drug therapy is confined to 3 chemotherapeutic agents (ie, methotrexate, cytosine arabinoside, and thio-TEPA) administered by a variety of schedules either by intralumbar or intraventricular drug delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

Although treatment of NM is palliative, with an expected median patient survival of 2 to 6 months, it often affords stabilization and protection from further neurologic deterioration in patients with NM.

Neoplastic meningitis from systemic malignancies: diagnosis, prognosis and treatment

Long-term survival is occasionally observed in patients with neoplastic meningitis (NM) accompanying breast cancer (13% one-year and 6% 2-year survival), melanoma, and lymphoma, but in general the survival of most patients is short and averages only 3 to 4 months. The incidence of NM appears to be increasing, in part due to earlier detection by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and in part due to development of more effective therapies for systemic cancer, which has resulted in a larger subset at risk for late-stage development of this complication. Survival of NM patients is negatively affected by concomitant progression of systemic disease despite multiple prior therapies. However, there are certain prognostic factors that have been identified as "favorable" in retrospective series, including age less than 60 years, long symptom duration, controlled systemic disease, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > or =70, lack of encephalopathy or cranial nerve deficits, low initial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein level, history of breast primary tumor, and lack of evidence of CSF compartmentalization or bulky meningeal disease as determined by CSF flow studies. Standard treatment has traditionally involved radiotherapy (RT) to sites of symptomatic or bulky disease, as detected by neuroimaging, and in selected patients, the administration of intrathecal, intraventricular, or systemic chemotherapy. However, treatment remains palliative and many patients and physicians choose supportive care only. Future hope is provided by studies that have improved our understanding of the disease pathogenesis, have identified prognostic variables associated with outcome, and have provided new therapeutic approaches, such as administration of high-dose systemic chemotherapy and investigations of novel therapeutic agents.

Phase II trial of intracerebrospinal fluid etoposide in the treatment of neoplastic meningitis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the current study was to determine the toxicity and response of a fixed dose intracerebrospinal fluid (CSF) etoposide in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed neoplastic meningitis (NM). NM reportedly occurs in 1% to 5% of patients with known cancer. Currently available treatment options are limited and provide only modest benefit.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients (median age, 55 yrs) with clinically and cytologically documented NM received intra-CSF etoposide. Tumor histologies included lung (8 patients), breast (5 patients), primary brain tumor (4 patients), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (4 patients), melanoma (4 patients), colon (1 patient), and prostate (1 patient). Concurrent involved-field radiotherapy (19 of 27 patients) or systemic chemotherapy (17 of 27 patients) was administered based on clinical indications. Etoposide was administered at a fixed dose (0.5 mg every day given 5 days per week every other week for 8 weeks [induction]). Patients were evaluated by CSF cytology and neurologic examination at the conclusion of induction therapy. Responding patients continued to receive etoposide (5 consecutive days every 4 weeks) with monthly evaluations.

RESULTS

Seven of 27 patients (26%) treated with etoposide had a cytologic response and either stable or improved neurologic status at the conclusion of induction. Eight patients (30%) developed disease progression during induction therapy and did not complete the 8-week induction course of therapy. At the conclusion of induction therapy, 12 patients (44%) had persistently positive CSF cytology, although they were clinically stable. In responding patients, time to neurologic disease progression ranged from 8 weeks to 40 weeks (median, 20 wks). Toxicity manifested as transient chemical arachnoiditis (5 of 27 patients; 13% of all treatment cycles). The 6-month neurologic disease progression-free survival was 11%.

CONCLUSIONS

Etoposide appears to have modest activity against NM and easily managed toxicity.

Neoplastic meningitis

Neoplastic meningitis is a complication of the CNS that occurs in 3-5% of patients with cancer and is characterised by multifocal neurological signs and symptoms. Diagnosis is problematic because the disease is commonly the result of pleomorphic manifestations of neoplastic meningitis and co-occurrence of disease at other sites. Useful tests to establish diagnosis and guide treatment include MRI of the brain and spine, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology, and radioisotope CSF flow studies. Assessment of the extent of disease of the CNS is of value because large-volume subarachnoid disease or CSF flow obstruction is prognostically significant. Radiotherapy is an established and beneficial treatment for patients with neoplastic meningitis with large tumour volume including parenchymal brain metastasis, sites of symptomatic disease, or CSF flow block. Because neoplastic meningitis affects the entire neuraxis, chemotherapy treatment can include intra-CSF fluid (either intraventricular or intralumbar) or systemic therapy. Most patients (>70%) with neoplastic meningitis have progressive systemic disease and consequently treatment is palliative and tumour response is of restricted durability. Furthermore, as there is no compelling evidence of a survival advantage with aggressive multimodal treatment, future trials need be done to determine the effect of treatment on quality of life and control of neurological symptoms.

Carcinomatous meningitis from urachal carcinoma: the first reported case

Carcinomatous meningitis (CM) occurs in less than 10% of cancer patients. Although patients frequently present with a focal complaint, multifocal signs are often found following careful neurological examination. The gold standard for diagnosis remains the demonstration of neoplastic cells in the cerebrospinal fluid. Despite the discouraging prognosis, palliative treatment may improve quality of life and lengthen lifespan. We report a patient with known primary carcinoma of the urachus who presented with headaches, nausea, vomiting and ataxia 1 week following resection of a nodular arachnoidal metastasis (indenting the cerebellum). Lumbar cerebrospinal fluid subsequently confirmed carcinomatous meningitis. This is the first reported case of carcinomatous meningitis resulting from metastatic urachal carcinoma.

Leptomeningeal cancer in the pediatric patient

The treatment and prophylaxis of leptomeningeal leukemia and lymphoma in children has dramatically improved disease control and long-term survival. However, the treatment of other leptomeningeal cancers has been less successful and the neurologic morbidity associated with central nervous system-directed therapy has a significant long-term impact on quality of life. Further research is critical to identify new therapeutic strategies for children with or at high risk for leptomeningeal cancer.

Current treatment of leptomeningeal metastases: systemic chemotherapy, intrathecal chemotherapy and symptom management

Treatment of leptomeningeal metastases is multifaceted and includes symptomatic therapy, intrathecal and systemic chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. As the majority of patients have widespread incurable systemic tumor, treatment is predominantly palliative; however, some patients with leukemia, lymphoma or breast cancer may have prolonged remissions and the possibility of cure.

Leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors (meningeal carcinomatosis)

Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are increasingly recognized as a devastating complication of solid tumors. Improved treatment of primary malignancy and advances in diagnostic imaging have led to an apparent increase in the number of patients diagnosed with LM. Unfortunately, therapeutic options remain limited. Radiotherapy is used to treat bulky tumor and provide symptomatic relief. Intrathecal chemotherapy benefits a selected subset of patients. The challenge to the future is to delineate the molecular mechanisms underlying LM and to develop novel therapeutic or prophylactic modalities to combat LM.

Enhanced Prospects for Drug Delivery and Brain Targeting by the Choroid Plexus–CSF Route

The choroid plexus (CP), i.e., the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCSFB) interface, is an epithelial boundary exploitable for drug delivery to brain. Agents transported from blood to lateral ventricles are convected by CSF volume transmission (bulk flow) to many periventricular targets. These include the caudate, hippocampus, specialized circumventricular organs, hypothalamus, and the downstream pia-glia and arachnoid membranes. The CSF circulatory system normally provides micronutrients, neurotrophins, hormones, neuropeptides, and growth factors extensively to neuronal networks. Therefore, drugs directed to CSF can modulate a variety of endocrine, immunologic, and behavioral phenomema; and can help to restore brain interstitial and cellular homeostasis disrupted by disease and trauma. This review integrates information from animal models that demonstrates marked physiologic effects of substances introduced into the ventricular system. It also recapitulates how pharmacologic agents administered into the CSF system prevent disease or enhance the brain's ability to recover from chemical and physical insults. In regard to drug distribution in the CNS, the BCSFB interaction with the blood-brain barrier is discussed. With a view toward translational CSF pharmacotherapy, there are several promising innovations in progress: bone marrow cell infusions, CP encapsulation and transplants, neural stem cell augmentation, phage display of peptide ligands for CP epithelium, CSF gene transfer, regulation of leukocyte and cytokine trafficking at the BCSFB, and the purification of neurotoxic CSF in degenerative states. The progressively increasing pharmacological significance of the CP-CSF nexus is analyzed in light of treating AIDS, multiple sclerosis, stroke, hydrocephalus, and Alzheimer's disease.

Neoplastic meningitis in patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract

BACKGROUND

Neoplastic meningitis (NM) occurs in 5-10% of patients with malignant disease. Little is known about the outcomes of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies who develop NM. For this report, the authors characterized the clinical course and attempted to identify prognostic factors in patients with NM due to primary malignancies of the GI tract.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 21 patients with GI primary tumors and NM were identified: Their medical records and imaging studies were reviewed.

RESULTS

The patient population was composed of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (n = 8 patients), esophageal adenocarcinoma (n = 7 patients), colon and/or rectal adenocarcinoma (n = 5 patients), and pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n = 1 patient). The median overall survival after the initial diagnosis of adenocarcinoma was 55 weeks (range, 8-884 wks), and the median survival after the diagnosis of NM was 7 weeks (range, 0-64 wks). Four patients died during palliative radiotherapy. No factors identified had an impact on outcome, including symptoms, physical findings at diagnosis, imaging characteristics, or cerebrospinal fluid findings. Univariate analysis showed a trend toward better outcomes for patients who received any kind of treatment directed toward the NM.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with NM from GI tract adenocarcinomas universally had poor outcomes. Until NM can be diagnosed earlier and/or until more effective therapies are identified, comfort care alone may be a reasonable alternative for some of these unfortunate patients.

Neoplastic meningitis

Neoplastic meningitis (NM) is a common problem in neuro-oncology occurring in approximately 5% of all patients with cancer, and is the third most common site of CNS metastases. NM is a disease affecting the entire neuraxis, and therefore clinical manifestations are pleomorphic affecting the spine, cranial nerves, and cerebral hemispheres. Because of craniospinal disease involvement, staging and treatment need to encompass all CSF compartments. Treatment of NM utilizes involved-field radiotherapy of bulky or symptomatic disease sites and intra-CSF drug therapy. The inclusion of concomitant systemic therapy may benefit patients with NM and may obviate the need for intra-CSF chemotherapy. At present, intra-CSF drug therapy is confined to three chemotherapeutic agents (ie, methotrexate, cytarabine, and thiotepa) administered by a variety of schedules either by intralumbar or intraventricular drug delivery. Although treatment of NM is palliative with an expected median patient survival of 2 to 6 months, it often affords stabilization and protection from further neurologic deterioration in patients with NM.

Neoplastic meningitis-related encephalopathy

BACKGROUND

A retrospective comparison evaluating survival in two well-matched cohorts of patients with cytologically positive neoplastic meningitis (NM) presenting with or without encephalopathy.

METHODS

Two cohorts were studied: 20 with and 20 without of NM-related encephalopathy defined as a confusional syndrome. Cohorts were matched with respect to age, primary tumor, performance status, absence of CSF compartmentalization and absence of neuroradiographic bulky CNS disease. Primary tumor histology included the following: breast(10 patients); non-small cell lung cancer (8); non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (8); colorectal cancer (6); melanoma (4); small cell lung cancer (2); prostate cancer (2). NM at presentation revealed: encephalopathy (20 patients); spinal cord dysfunction (18); and cranial neuropathy (15). Radiotherapy was administered to 31 patients (whole brain only in 17 patients; restricted spine only in 8 patients; whole brain and restricted spine in 6 patients). All patients received intraventricular chemotherapy and 16 patients received concurrent tumor-specific systemic chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Median survival was 2.5 months (range 1.5-5 months) in the cohort with NM-related encephalopathy compared to 6 months (range: 2-10 months) in the cohort without NM-related encephalopathy (p < 0.001). No treatment-related deaths were observed. All patients demonstrated progressive disease and died of either NM or systemic cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

NM-related encephalopathy is a clinical variable that predicts for poor survival in patients with NM. As a consequence, patients with NM-related encephalopathy may be best served by offering supportive care.

Radiation therapy for leptomeningeal cancer

Radiotherapy has multiple roles in the treatment of leptomeningeal cancer. While it is uncommon for patients to experience regression of neurologic deficits due to leptomeningeal cancer, focal radiotherapy often provides significant palliation of pain, increased intracranial pressure and other focal symptoms. Focal radiotherapy may also be used to eliminate blockages of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and allow for safe administration of intrathecal chemotherapy. Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is most often used as prophylaxis for patients at high risk of leptomeningeal tumor dissemination, but may result in symptom palliation and prolonged disease control for patients with active leptomeningeal tumor.

The relevance of intraventricular chemotherapy for leptomeningeal metastasis in breast cancer: a randomised study

To assess the benefit of intraventricular chemotherapy, patients with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) from breast cancer were randomised to treatment including intraventricular (IT) chemotherapy (n=17) or to non-intrathecal (non-IT) treatment (n=18). Appropriate systemic therapy and involved field radiation therapy (RT) were given in both arms. Intention-to-treat analysis showed neurological improvement or stabilisation in 59% of the IT and in 67% of the non-IT group, with median time to progression of 23 weeks (IT) and 24 weeks (non-IT). Median survival of IT patients was 18.3 weeks and 30.3 weeks for non-IT patients (difference 12.9 weeks; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) -5.5 to +34.3 weeks; P=0.32). Neurological complications of treatment occurred in 47% (IT) vs 6% (non-IT) (P=0.0072). In conclusion, standard systemic chemotherapy with involved field RT for LM from breast cancer is feasible. Addition of intraventricular chemotherapy does not lead to survival benefit or improved neurological response, and is associated with an increased risk of neurotoxicity.

Severe complications after intrathecal methotrexate (MTX) for treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL)

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare and highly malignant tumor with increasing incidence. Survival has improved with the use of nonsurgical treatment modalities, of which methotrexate (MTX)-based intrathecal chemotherapy has been an important option. Here, we describe devastating complications in three patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. After intrathecal MTX therapy two patients died secondary to fulminant brain edema. A third patient developed severe dementia, gait disturbance and urinary incontinence due to leukencephalopathy. Since bulky disease was present in all three patients, CSF flow may have been impaired. This might have exposed adjacent tissue to prolonged toxic drug concentrations. Regarding the severe complications seen in these patients, it is useful to consider high-dose intravenous MTX treatment only in periventricular PCNSL.

Neurologic complications of hematologic neoplasms

The new WHO classification of hematopoietic and lymphatic neoplasms was devised to offer pathologists, oncologists, and geneticists a system of classification based on histopathologic, clinical, and genetic features. From the neurologic standpoint, it offers an opportunity to consolidate the complications produced by leukemias, lymphomas, and plasma cell dyscrasias. This article summarizes such complications that occur as a result of direct infiltration or compression of nervous tissue by tumor or as a result of indirect effects such as infection, vascular disorders, iatrogenesis, and paraneoplasia.

Combined-modality treatment of leptomeningeal gliomatosis

OBJECTIVE

Leptomeningeal gliomatosis (LG) is a clinically uncommon metastatic complication of high-grade gliomas (HGGs), for which there is no consensus regarding treatment. The goal of this study was to determine the toxicity and response rate of combined-modality therapy for the treatment of patients with HGGs and LG.

METHODS

Eighteen patients (10 men and 8 women), ranging in age from 28 to 70 years (median, 38 yr), with clinically, neuroradiologically, and cytologically documented LG received intraventricular chemotherapy. Tumor histological types included anaplastic astrocytoma (10 patients) and glioblastoma multiforme (8 patients). Concurrent radiotherapy (11 patients) or systemic chemotherapy (13 patients) was administered as clinically indicated. Methotrexate was administered initially, and treatment was continued for patients in stable or improved condition. For patients who experienced progression, cytosine arabinoside was administered as second-line therapy, followed by N,N',N"-triethylenethiophosphoramide as third-line therapy. Patients underwent bimonthly evaluations with cerebrospinal fluid cytological assessments and neurological examinations.

RESULTS

Four to 13 cycles (median, 5 cycles) of intraventricular chemotherapy were administered. Toxicity included aseptic meningitis (12 patients), radiation-induced enteritis (2 patients), and myelosuppression of Grade II or less (4 patients). No patient required hospitalization or transfusions, and no treatment-related deaths occurred. Partial responses were observed for 6 patients, and 12 patients demonstrated progressive disease. The median duration of response was 3 months (range, 2-4 mo). Survival times after the initiation of intraventricular chemotherapy ranged from 2 to 8 months (median, 3.5 mo). The cause of death was progressive LG (14 patients), combined LG and HGG (3 patients), and HGG (1 patient).

CONCLUSION

For this small cohort of patients, combined-modality therapy had modest toxicity but minimal palliative efficacy. For the majority of patients with LG, supportive care should be considered.

Systemic chemotherapy, intrathecal chemotherapy, and symptom management in the treatment of leptomeningeal metastasis

Metastasis to the leptomeninges occurs in many common cancers, including leukemia; lung, breast, and gastrointestinal cancers; and tumors of the brain. By way of the flow of cerebrospinal fluid, leptomeningeal metastasis spreads throughout the neuraxis. Consequently, therapy for leptomeningeal metastasis must be directed to the entire central nervous system (CNS). Treatment often consists of involved-field radiotherapy, systemic chemotherapy, and intrathecal chemotherapy. However, because meningeal spread occurs most often in advanced disease, treatment is mainly palliative, except in childhood leukemia, where durable remission has been reported. This article outlines the role of systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy in patients with leptomeningeal metastases. Strategies for symptom management in these patients are also described.

Standard and novel radiotherapeutic approaches to neoplastic meningitis

Neoplastic meningitis usually occurs late in the natural history of cancer. Adequate staging and assessment of the patient's overall reserves and prognosis are crucial in determining whether aggressive treatment is justified. Although radiotherapy remains the single most effective treatment, it is considered palliative for epithelial cancers and is generally directed to sites of bulky disease that obstruct the flow of cerebrospinal fluid or cause neurologic dysfunction. Such diseases as leukemia, medulloblastoma, and germinoma are exceptions that can be treated definitively with craniospinal irradiation. Innovations in conformal therapy may help to reduce the significant amount of myelosuppression associated with spinal irradiation. The main long-term toxicity associated with whole-brain irradiation (WBI) is dementia resulting from leukoencephalopathy, which may be exacerbated when WBI is given in combination with chemotherapy. A case report highlighting the use of radiotherapy for palliation in a patient with neoplastic meningitis is presented at the end of this article.

A phase II trial of intra-cerebrospinal fluid alpha interferon in the treatment of neoplastic meningitis

BACKGROUND

Neoplastic meningitis (NM), a metastatic complication of both primary central nervous system and systemic cancer, occurs in 1-5% of patients with known cancer. Currently available treatment options are limited and provide only modest benefit. The current study was performed to determine the toxicity and response rate of intra-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) alpha interferon (alpha-IFN) in the treatment of patients with NM.

METHODS

Twenty two patients (median age, 56 years) with clinical and cytologically documented NM received intra-CSF alpha-IFN. Tumor histologies included: lung (five patients); brain (five patients); non-Hodgkin lymphoma (three patients); breast (three patients); melanoma (two patients); chronic myelogenous leukemia (two patients); colon (one patient); and prostate (one patient). Concurrent involved-field radiotherapy (12 out of 22 patients) or systemic chemotherapy (11 out of 22) was administered based on clinical indications. -alpha-IFN was administered at a fixed dose (1 x 10(6) IU every other day given three times per week for four weeks by induction). Patients were evaluated by CSF cytology and neurologic examination at the conclusion of induction therapy. Responding patients continued to receive alpha-IFN with monthly evaluations.

RESULTS

Ten out of 22 patients (45%) treated with alpha-IFN had a cytologic response and either stable or improved neurologic status at the conclusion of induction. Duration of response ranged from 8 to 40 weeks (median, 16 weeks). Toxicity was manifested as transient chemical arachnoiditis (16 out of 22 patients; 60% of all treatment cycles) and chronic fatigue (20 out of 22 patients). No treatment-related hospitalizations or deaths were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

alpha-IFN has modest activity against NM. However, it is associated with considerable toxicity at the dose and schedule used in the current study and, as a result, may prove difficult to administer.

Neoplastic meningitis

Neoplastic meningitis (NM) is a common problem in neuro-oncology, occurring in approximately 5% of all patients with cancer. Notwithstanding frequent focal signs and symptoms, NM is a disease that affects the entire neuraxis; therefore, staging and treatment need to encompass all cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compartments. Central nervous system (CNS) staging of NM includes contrast-enhanced cranial computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, contrast-enhanced spine magnetic resonance imaging or computerized tomographic myelography, and radionuclide CSF flow study. Treatment of NM involves involved-field radiotherapy of bulky or symptomatic disease sites and intra-CSF drug therapy. The inclusion of concomitant systemic therapy may benefit patients with NM and may obviate the need for intra-CSF chemotherapy. At present, intra-CSF drug therapy is confined to three chemotherapeutic agents (ie, methotrexate, cytosine arabinoside, and thio-triethylene thiophosphoramide) administered by a variety of schedules either by intralumbar or intraventricular drug delivery. Although treatment of NM is palliative with an expected median patient survival of 2 to 6 months, it often affords stabilization and protection from further neurologic deterioration in patients with NM.

Neoplastic meningitis

Neoplastic meningitis is recognized clinically in 4% to 7% of patients with extraneural cancer, but it remains dramatically under-diagnosed. The frequency of neoplastic meningitis is increasing because of heightened clinical suspicion, improved neuroimaging techniques, and longer survival in patients with extraneural cancer Longer survival allows residual tumor cells within central nervous system sanctuary sites time to become symptomatic. Affected patients may present with cerebral, cranial nerve, or spinal signs and symptoms, depending on the specific sites of central nervous system (CNS) involvement. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) seems to be sensitive for detecting metastatic deposits along the neuraxis. However, metastases at a microscopic level are below the resolution of MRI scanning. As a result, the standard diagnostic test for neoplastic meningitis remains the cytologic identification of malignant cells in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Although CSF cytology is useful, malignant cells are not detected in as many as one third of patients who have compelling clinical or radiographic evidence of neoplastic meningitis. Novel assays are being tested that may enhance the early identification of malignant cells in CSF. Currently, the diagnosis occurs generally after the onset of neurologic manifestations and heralds a rapidly fatal course for most patients. By the time symptoms appear, most tumors have disseminated widely within the CNS, due to cortical irritation, compression of nervous system structures, or obstruction of CSF flow. At this stage surgery, cranial irradiation, and chemotherapy are rarely, if ever, curative. The goals of treatment are to improve or to stabilize the neurologic status of patients and to prolong survival. A major problem in treating neoplastic meningitis is that the entire neuraxis must be treated. If only symptomatic areas are treated, reseeding of the neuraxis with tumor cells will occur. Therefore, intrathecal chemotherapy remains a mainstay of therapy. Currently, four therapeutic agents are available for intrathecal treatment: methotrexate, ara-C, sustained-release ara-C (DepoCyt; Chiron Therapeutics, San Francisco, CA), and thiotepa. Unfortunately, intrathecal chemotherapy does not treat bulky disease in the subarachnoid space, and often is slow to stabilize progressive neurologic deficits. For these reasons, radiation therapy to sites of symptomatic disease and sites of bulky disease on imaging studies is recommended. High dose intravenous methotrexate may be as effective as intrathecal methotrexate. Alternative approaches (which offer less toxicity, enhanced therapeutic effect, and prolonged survival) are being investigated.

Intrathecal chemotherapy

An unforeseen consequence of improved disease-free survival in many hematologic and solid tumor malignancies has been an increase in the incidence of disease recurrence in the leptomeninges. The recognition of the central nervous system (CNS) as a unique 'sanctuary' site has resulted in the development of therapeutic strategies specifically directed at the leptomeninges. Although therapeutic strategies have been successful in the prevention and treatment of CNS leukemia, there are still a paucity of therapeutic options for patients with neoplastic meningitis due to solid tumors or recurrent CNS leukemia. This article provides an overview of the pharmacology and toxicity of intrathecal agents that are commonly employed in the treatment and prevention of leptomeningeal disease, and describes new agents that are in the early stages of clinical development.

Neoplastic meningitis: a guide to diagnosis and treatment

Neoplastic meningitis is a disease of the entire neuraxis and is pleomorphic in its clinical presentation. Diagnosis is achieved by recognition of the clinical manifestations of neoplastic meningitis followed by neuroradiography of the brain and spinal cord and examination of the cerebrospinal fluid. Treatment, if clinically warranted, includes irradiation of symptomatic or bulky disease and intracerebrospinal fluid chemotherapy following an assessment of the extent of metastatic disease treatment is based on the results of four randomized intracerebrospinal fluid chemotherapy trials.

Neoplastic meningitis: diagnosis and treatment considerations

Neoplastic meningitis is an increasingly recognized complication of advanced metastatic cancer and, if left undiagnosed or untreated, is characterized by rapid neurologic deterioration and death. Thus, the diagnosis and treatment of neoplastic meningitis present challenges for the clinical oncologist. The diagnosis of neoplastic meningitis is based on clinical signs and symptoms, laboratory analysis of cerebrospinal fluid to determine cell count and cytology, and analysis of neuroimaging studies for evidence of leptomeningeal or cranial nerve enhancement. Once diagnosed, conventional treatment regimens may include radiotherapy combined with systemic or intrathecal chemotherapy, often with the antimetabolites cytarabine and/or methotrexate. However, the prognosis for neoplastic meningitis secondary to an underlying solid tumor or recurrent leukemia is poor with conventional treatment regimens. Therefore, novel agents for intrathecal administration, including DepoCyttrade mark, mafosfamide, and topotecan, or novel therapeutic approaches, including conjugated monoclonal antibodies and immunotoxins or gene therapy, are currently under investigation. Such new agents and therapeutic approaches will facilitate the development of effective treatment strategies and will ultimately improve the outcome for patients with this devastating disease. This article provides an overview of the approaches to the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of neoplastic meningitis.