Phase 1 study of high-dose DFMO, celecoxib, cyclophosphamide and topotecan for patients with relapsed neuroblastoma: a New Approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy trial

BACKGROUND

MYC genes regulate ornithine decarboxylase (Odc) to increase intratumoral polyamines. We conducted a Phase I trial [NCT02030964] to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of DFMO, an Odc inhibitor, with celecoxib, cyclophosphamide and topotecan.

METHODS

Patients 2-30 years of age with relapsed/refractory high-risk neuroblastoma received oral DFMO at doses up to 9000 mg/m2/day, with celecoxib (500 mg/m2 daily), cyclophosphamide (250 mg/m2/day) and topotecan (0.75 mg/m2/day) IV for 5 days, for up to one year with G-CSF support.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients (median age, 6.8 years) received 136 courses. Slow platelet recovery with 21-day courses (dose-levels 1 and 2) led to subsequent dose-levels using 28-day courses (dose-levels 2a-4a). There were three course-1 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; hematologic; anorexia; transaminases), and 23 serious adverse events (78% fever-related). Five patients (21%) completed 1-year of therapy. Nine stopped for PD, 2 for DLT, 8 by choice. Best overall response included two PR and four MR. Median time-to-progression was 19.8 months, and 3 patients remained progression-free at >4 years without receiving additional therapy. The MTD of DFMO with this regimen was 6750 mg/m2/day.

CONCLUSION

High-dose DFMO is tolerable when added to chemotherapy in heavily pre-treated patients. A randomized Phase 2 trial of DFMO added to chemoimmunotherapy is ongoing [NCT03794349].

Comprehensive Single-Cell Immune Profiling Defines the Patient Multiple Myeloma Microenvironment Following Oncolytic Virus Therapy in a Phase Ib Trial

PURPOSE

Our preclinical studies showed that the oncolytic reovirus formulation pelareorep (PELA) has significant immunomodulatory anti-myeloma activity. We conducted an investigator-initiated clinical trial to evaluate PELA in combination with dexamethasone (Dex) and bortezomib (BZ) and define the tumor immune microenvironment (TiME) in patients with multiple myeloma treated with this regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (n = 14) were enrolled in a phase Ib clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02514382) of three escalating PELA doses administered on Days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16. Patients received 40 mg Dex and 1.5 mg/m2 BZ on Days 1, 8, and 15. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Pre- and posttreatment bone marrow specimens (IHC, n = 9; imaging mass cytometry, n = 6) and peripheral blood samples were collected for analysis (flow cytometry, n = 5; T-cell receptor clonality, n = 7; cytokine assay, n = 7).

RESULTS

PELA/BZ/Dex was well-tolerated in all patients. Treatment-emergent toxicities were transient, and no dose-limiting toxicities occurred. Six (55%) of 11 response-evaluable patients showed decreased paraprotein. Treatment increased T and natural killer cell activation, inflammatory cytokine release, and programmed death-ligand 1 expression in bone marrow. Compared with nonresponders, responders had higher reovirus protein levels, increased cytotoxic T-cell infiltration posttreatment, cytotoxic T cells in significantly closer proximity to multiple myeloma cells, and larger populations of a novel immune-primed multiple myeloma phenotype (CD138+ IDO1+HLA-ABCHigh), indicating immunomodulation.

CONCLUSIONS

PELA/BZ/Dex is well-tolerated and associated with anti-multiple myeloma activity in a subset of responding patients, characterized by immune reprogramming and TiME changes, warranting further investigation of PELA as an immunomodulator.

EphrinB2 Inhibition and Pembrolizumab in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma have poor prognosis after failure of standard first-line chemotherapy. Immune check point programmed death 1-programmed death ligand 1 antibodies have low response rates and thus there exists a major unmet need.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this phase II trial, patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma that recurred or progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy received soluble EphB4-human serum albumin (sEphB4-HSA) in combination with pembrolizumab. The primary end points were tolerability and overall survival (OS). The secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, and toxicity. The expression of sEphB4-HSA target EphrinB2 was correlated with outcomes.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were enrolled. The median follow up was 22.9 months (range, 1.3-54.7). The regimen had acceptable toxicity. In the intent-to-treat analysis (N = 70), the median OS was 14.6 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 21.5). Twenty-six (37%) patients had an objective response (95% CI, 26 to 48). The median PFS was 4.1 (95% CI, 1.5 to 5.7) months. Forty-six (66%) patients expressed EphrinB2, and among them, the median OS was 21.5 months (95% CI, 12.4 to not reached), the ORR was 52% (95% CI, 37 to 67), including a complete response rate of 24% (11 of 46; 95% CI, 12 to 36). The median PFS was 5.7 (95% CI, 2.7 to 27.9) months. Response was maintained at 6, 12, and 24 months in 88%, 74%, and 69% of the patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The combination of sEphB4-HSA and pembrolizumab appears synergistic with improved OS and ORR compared with historical data for programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 monotherapy.

Safety, Outcomes, and T-Cell Characteristics in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory MDS or CMML Treated with Atezolizumab in Combination with Guadecitabine

PURPOSE

We hypothesized that resistance to hypomethylating agents (HMA) among patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) would be overcome by combining a programmed death-ligand 1 antibody with an HMA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a Phase I/II, multicenter clinical trial for patients with MDS not achieving an International Working Group response after at least 4 cycles of an HMA ("refractory") or progressing after a response ("relapsed") with 3+ or higher risk MDS by the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) and CMML-1 or -2. Phase I consisted of a 3+3 dose-escalation design beginning with guadecitabine at 30 mg/m2 and escalating to 60 mg/m2 Days 1 to 5 with fixed-dose atezolizumab: 840 mg intravenously Days 8 and 22 of a 28-day cycle. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability; secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR) and survival.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients, median age 73 (range 54-85), were treated. Thirty patients had MDS and 3 had CMML, with 30% relapsed and 70% refractory. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in Phase I. There were 3 (9%) deaths in ≤ 30 days. Five patients (16%) came off study for drug-related toxicity. Immune-related adverse events (IRAE) occurred in 12 (36%) patients (4 grade 3, 3 grade 2, and 5 grade1). ORR was 33% [95% confidence interval (CI), 19%-52%] with 2 complete remission (CR), 3 hematologic improvement, 5 marrow CR, and 1 partial remission. Median overall survival was 15.1 (95% CI, 8.5-25.3) months.

CONCLUSIONS

Guadecitabine with atezolizumab has modest efficacy with manageable IRAEs and typical cytopenia-related safety concerns for patients with relapsed or refractory MDS and CMML.

Phase I/II study of regorafenib (rego) and pembrolizumab (pembro) in refractory microsatellite stable colorectal cancer (MSSCRC)

15

Background: Immune check point inhibitors (ICI) are ineffective in MSSCRC. Combination of ICI with targeted agents has the potential to alter the tumor microenvironment and render these tumors vulnerable to ICI. We report the results of the multicenter study of rego and pembro in a diverse patient population with advanced MSSCRC. Methods: This was an investigator-initiated study and enrolled patients (pts) who had failed/were intolerant of chemotherapy at 3 sites. A 3+3 design was used for phase I to evaluate escalating doses of rego (80,120,160, days 1-14/21) in combination with pembro (200m/q3weeks). The primary endpoint was dose limiting toxicities during the first cycle. For phase II, pts received rego at the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) with pembro. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR). The study was powered to show an improvement in PFS from 1.9 months (CORRECT data) to 2.85 months. Estimated sample size for phase II was 63 pts. Results: Study started in 7/2019 and accrual completed in 7/2021. Of 73 pts, 10 enrolled in phase I and 63 in phase II. RP2D of rego was 80 mg, days 1-14/21, and 70 pts treated at that dose. As of Sep 14, 11 pts remain on treatment. At baseline, median age was 54 years (23-81), 51% female, 53% white, 19% Asian, 12% black, and 11% Hispanic, median prior lines of therapy 2 (1-5), primary tumor location rectosigmoid/rectal 13%, KRAS mutated 68%, BRAF mutated 5%. Liver metastases was present in 78% of the pts. There was no grade 4 toxicity. The most common grade 3 toxicities were rash (20%), followed by hand-foot syndrome and HTN (7%). Dose modification was required in 14%. The most common reason for discontinuation was disease progression (85%), followed by withdrawal of consent (12%). With a median follow up of 5.3 (range:0.6-24.4) months, median PFS was 2.0 (1.8 -3.5) months, and median OS was 10.9 (5.3-NR) months. In 16 pts (23%), with non-liver metastatic disease PFS was 4.3 (1.9-8.4) months. No objective response was observed. Stable disease was observed in 49% of pts, median duration of stable disease was 2 (0.2-18.8) months. Conclusions: This is the largest trial of combination of ICI + rego in MSSCRC reported to date. The trial didn’t meet its primary endpoint, though the median OS is provocative. Analysis of biomarkers for identification of pts with longer duration of benefit is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03657641.

Randomized Phase II Trial of MIBG Versus MIBG, Vincristine, and Irinotecan Versus MIBG and Vorinostat for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma: A Report From NANT Consortium

PURPOSE

131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) is an active radiotherapeutic for neuroblastoma. The primary aim of this trial was to identify which of three MIBG regimens was likely associated with the highest true response rate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients 1-30 years were eligible if they had relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma, at least one MIBG-avid site, and adequate autologous stem cells. Patients received MIBG 18 mCi/kg on day 1 and autologous stem cell on day 15. Patients randomly assigned to arm A received only MIBG; patients randomly assigned to arm B received intravenous vincristine on day 0 and irinotecan daily on days 0-4; patients randomly assigned to arm C received vorinostat (180 mg/m2/dose) orally once daily on days 1 to 12. The primary end point was response after one course by New Approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy criteria. The trial was designed with 105 patients to ensure an 80% chance that the arm with highest response rate was selected.

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen patients were enrolled, with three ineligible and six unevaluable, leaving 105 eligible and evaluable patients (36 in arm A, 35 in arm B, and 34 in arm C; 55 boys; and median age 6.5 years). After one course, the response rates (partial response or better) on arms A, B, and C were 14% (95% CI, 5 to 30), 14% (5 to 31), and 32% (18 to 51). An additional five, five, and four patients met New Approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy Minor Response criteria on arms A, B, and C, respectively. On arms A, B, and C, rates of any grade 3+ nonhematologic toxicity after first course were 19%, 49%, and 35%.

CONCLUSION

Vorinostat and MIBG is likely the arm with the highest true response rate, with manageable toxicity. Vincristine and irinotecan do not appear to improve the response rate to MIBG and are associated with increased toxicity.

Phase II trial of soluble EphB4-albumin in combination with PD-1 antibody (pembrolizumab) in relapsed/refractory head neck squamous cell carcinoma

6016

Background: EphB4 receptor tyrosine kinase and its ligand EphrinB2 are highly induced in head neck squamous cell carcinoma (HN SCC) tumor cells and vessels, particularly in HPV negative tumors. Each are predictors for poor survival with worse prognosis when both are induced. EphB4 provides tumor cell survival and EphrinB2 inhibits immune cell invasion. Soluble EphB4-Alb blocks bidirectional signaling, enhances immune cell recruitment alone and when combined with PD-1 antibody. Methods: A phase II trial of sEphB4-Alb combined with pembrolizumab accrued HN SCC patients after failure of one or more prior regimens. IHC positivity for p16 was used as a surrogate for HPV infection. Treatment regimen was sEphB4-Alb 10 mg/kg weekly IV infusion with pembrolizumab 200 mg IV infusion every three weeks. Study endpoints were toxicity, overall response rates (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Response to therapy was based on RECIST 1.1 criteria. Patient tumor samples were collected at baseline with a 2nd biopsy at week 8 on therapy, for tissue analysis of PD-L1, EphrinB2 and other biomarkers. Results: Twenty-four patients were accrued to the phase II trial combination of sEphB4-Alb and pembrolizumab. Age, sex, prior treatment, HPV status, and response data are summarized in the table below. The most common toxicity was hypertension with 8 patients experiencing grade 3 HTN. No grade 4 or above toxicities were observed. Among HPV negative cases, partial and complete responses were observed in 6 of 14 patients (43%) with complete response (CR) observed in 3 of 6 responders. Additionally, rapid response was observed in 3 of 14 HPV negative patients. Response was associated with increase in immune markers on 2nd biopsy. Median overall and progression-free survival in all patients was 12.6 months and 8.6 months, respectively. Conclusions: 1. sEphB4-Alb was well tolerated in combination with PD-1 antibody. 2. sEphB4-Alb was associated with increased immune response to tumor, when combined with PD-1 antibody. 3. sEphB4-Alb appears to have substantial activity (including complete remission) when combined with PD-1 antibody in relapsed/refractory HPV negative HN SCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03049618. [Table: see text]

A phase 1 trial of FID-007, a novel nanoparticle paclitaxel formulation, in patients with solid tumors

3021

Background: FID-007 (FID) consists of paclitaxel encapsulated in a polyethyloxazoline (PEOX) polymer excipient designed to enhance PK, biodistribution, and tolerability. In addition to allowing the drug to remain in solution until it can enter a cancer cell, the PEOX nanoparticle preferentially delivers paclitaxel to the tumor through the leaky hyperpermeable vasculature. In xenograft studies, FID reduced or limited tumor growth in multiple tumor types including lung, gastric, breast, pancreatic, and ovarian cancer. FID was more effective at lower or comparable taxane doses with fewer side effects. We present the first-in-human trial of FID. Methods: The study is evaluating the safety, PK, and efficacy of FID in pts with advanced solid tumors. The primary objective is to determine the MTD and RP2D. Pts received FID in doses between 15mg/m2 and 125mg/m2 using a standard 3+3 dose escalation design. FID was given IV on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Eligibility included ECOG 0-2, adequate organ function, and no more than 3 prior lines of cytotoxic therapy for advanced disease. Results: Twenty-five pts were treated across 6 dose levels. Median age was 62 (44-76). ECOG PS was 2 in 1 pt and 1 in 64%. Median number of cycles was 2 (1-16). There were 2 DLTs of grade 3 rash at 100 mg/m2. Given the transient nature of the rash and response to topical therapy, DLT definition was modified to exclude grade 3 rash that lasts ≤ 7 days and additional patients were treated at 100 mg/m2 which was deemed tolerable. There was 1 DLT of grade 3 neutropenia at 125 mg/m2. All grade treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) in ≥ 25% of pts were rash (64%), alopecia (52%), pruritus (44%), anemia (44%) leukopenia, fatigue (40% each), dysgeusia, anorexia, nausea (32% each), and neutropenia (28%). Grade 3/4 TRAEs occurring in > 1 pt were anemia (20%), neutropenia, leukopenia, and maculopapular rash (16%). There were no treatment discontinuations due to toxicity. Twenty-two pts were evaluable for response by RECIST 1.1 with a PR rate of 14% (PR in pancreatic, biliary tract and NSCLC) and disease control rate of 59%. PK is linear and dose proportional. There is no paclitaxel accumulation after weekly dosing, and the t1/2 is between 18-26 hours. Conclusions: FID has a manageable safety profile with MTD not reached. Accrual is continuing at 125 mg/m2. PK is linear, dose proportional and comparable to that of nab-paclitaxel. There is preliminary evidence of anti-tumor activity in heavily pre-treated pts across different tumor types. Enrollment in dose escalation continues. Combination studies with immunotherapeutic agents are planned. Clinical trial information: NCT03537690.

Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Bevacizumab with Modified FOLFOX7 in Patients with Stage II and III Rectal Cancer

LESSONS LEARNED

Neoadjuvant bevacizumab with modified FOLFOX7 without radiation failed to meet the goal of pathological complete response rate; however, the low number of recurrence and disease-free survival in this population, with predominantly stage III, is encouraging and worth further exploration. The racial distribution of the patient population, as well as a wait time of more than 4 weeks after last chemotherapy, may have contributed to the findings.

BACKGROUND

Combination chemotherapy in lieu of radiation in rectal adenocarcinoma is under exploration in multiple trials. We evaluated the efficacy of neoadjuvant FOLFOX + bevacizumab in patients (pts) with clinical stage II and III disease.

METHODS

Pts received six cycles of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) and modified FOLFOX7 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² , leucovorin 20 mg/m² , and fluorouracil [5-FU] 2,400 mg/m² ). Surgical resection was performed 6-8 weeks after completion of treatment and upon confirmation of nonmetastatic disease. We employed a Simon two-stage design and required three pathological complete responses (pCR) in the first 18 pts, with a prespecified pCR rate of 25% before moving to the next stage.

RESULTS

Seventeen pts enrolled; 65% at stage III. Median age was 57 (35-79), 65% were male, 47% were Hispanic, 35% were white, and 18% were Asian. All pts but one completed six cycles of therapy. One pCR was observed (6%), and 11 of 17 (65%) pts had pathological downstaging. One patient experienced systemic recurrence and remains on treatment. Probability of disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years is 0.94 (SE, 0.06).

CONCLUSION

The study failed to meet the required three pCRs in the first 18 pts. The DFS in this population is encouraging and supports the hypothesis that select pts with rectal cancer may be spared from radiation.

Randomized phase II trial of MIBG versus MIBG/vincristine/irinotecan versus MIBG/vorinostat for relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma: A report from the New Approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy Consortium

10500

Background: 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) remains one of the most active agents for neuroblastoma. It is not clear if putative radiation sensitizers improve upon this activity. The primary aim of this trial was to identify the MIBG treatment regimen with highest response rate among: MIBG monotherapy (Arm A); MIBG/Vincristine/Irinotecan (Arm B); MIBG/Vorinostat (Arm C). The secondary aim was to compare toxicity across arms. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, randomized phase II trial. Patients 1-30 years with relapsed/refractory high-risk neuroblastoma were eligible with at least one MIBG-avid site and adequate autologous stem cells (ASCs). All patients received MIBG 18 mCi/kg on Day 1 and ASC on day 15. Patients on Arm A received only MIBG; patients on Arm B also received vincristine (2 mg/m2) IV on Day 0 and irinotecan (50 mg/m2) IV daily on Days 0-4; patients on Arm C also received vorinostat (180 mg/m2) orally once daily on days -1 to 12. The primary endpoint was response after one course according to NANT response criteria. The trial was designed as a pick-the-winner study with a maximum of 105 eligible and evaluable patients to ensure an 80% chance that the arm with highest response rate is selected, if that response rate is at least 15% higher than the other arms. Results: 114 patients enrolled. Three patients were ineligible and 6 eligible patients never received MIBG, leaving 105 eligible and evaluable patients (36 Arm A; 35 Arm B; and 34 Arm C; 55 boys; median age 6.5 years). 9 patients had received prior MIBG monotherapy, 65 prior irinotecan, and 7 prior vorinostat. After one course, the response rates (Partial Response or better) on Arms A, B, and C were 17% (95% CI 7-33%), 14% (5-31%), and 32% (18-51%). An additional 4, 4, and 7 patients met NANT Minor Response criteria [partial response in one disease category (e.g., bone marrow) and stable disease in other categories] on Arms A, B, and C, respectively. On Arms A, B, and C, rates of any grade 3+ non-hematologic toxicity were 19%, 49% and 32%; rates of grade 3+ diarrhea were 0%, 11%, 0%; and rates of grade 3+ febrile neutropenia were 6%, 11%, and 0%. Conclusions: The combination of vorinostat/MIBG had the highest response rate, with manageable toxicity. Vincristine and irinotecan do not improve the response rate to MIBG and are associated with increased toxicity. These data provide response rates for MIBG monotherapy in a contemporary patient population assessed with current response criteria. Clinical trial information: NCT02035137.

Expression of the luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR) in ovarian cancer

We investigated the association of LHR expression in epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) with clinical and pathologic characteristics of patients. LHR expression was examined immunohistochemically using tissue microarrays (TMAs) of specimens from 232 OC patients. Each sample was scored quantitatively evaluating LHR staining intensity (LHR-I) and percentage of LHR (LHR-P) staining cells in tumor cells examined. LHR-I was assessed as no staining (negative), weak (+ 1), moderate (+ 2), and strong positive (+ 3). LHR-P was measured as 1 to 5, 6 to 50% and >  50% of the tumor cells examined. Positive LHR staining was found in 202 (87%) patients' tumor specimens and 66% patients had strong intensity LHR expression. In 197 (85%) of patients, LHR-P was measured in > 50% of tumor cells. LHR-I was significantly associated with pathologic stage (p = 0.007). We found that 72% of stage III or IV patients expressed strong LHR-I in tumor cells. There were 87% of Silberberg's grade 2 or 3 patients compared to 70% of grade 1 patients with LHR expression observed in > 50% of tumor cells, p = 0.037. Tumor stage was significantly associated with overall survival and recurrence free survival, p < 0.001 for both analyses, even after adjustment for age, tumor grade and whether patient had persistent disease after therapy or not. Our study demonstrates that LHR is highly expressed in the majority of OC patients. Both LHR-I and LHR-P are significantly associated with either the pathologic stage or tumor grade.

A Phase I Study of the Combination of Rituximab and Ipilimumab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Lymphoma

PURPOSE

Based on the potential for ipilimumab (I) to augment T-cell activation, we hypothesize that ipilimumab would augment the efficacy of rituximab (R) in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CD20⁺non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). This phase I study aimed to identify a recommended phase 2 dose, document toxicities, and preliminarily assess efficacy and potential predictive biomarkers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-three patients with R/R CD20⁺B-cell lymphoma received R at 375 mg/m²weekly for 4 weeks and I at 3 mg/kg on day 1 and every 3 weeks for four doses. Responding patients went on to maintenance with each agent given every 12 weeks. To facilitate correlative analysis, the expansion phase randomized patients to simultaneous R+I versus R with I delayed 2 weeks.

RESULTS

Toxicity was manageable; no dose-limiting toxicity was observed at the doses studied. When considering the entire cohort, efficacy was modest, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 24% and median progression-free survival (PFS) of 2.6 months. However, in follicular lymphoma patients, the ORR was 58% with a median PFS of 5.6 months. The randomized comparison of R with R+I demonstrated that R+I resulted in more effective B-cell depletion (BCD). Both B-cell depletion and the ratio of CD45RA^-regulatory T cell (Treg) to Treg were associated with response at all time points.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of R+I has manageable toxicity and encouraging efficacy in R/R follicular lymphoma. The ratio of CD45RA^-Tregs to total Tregs, and peripheral BCD should be studied further as potential predictors of response.

Influence of the facility caseload on the subsequent survival of men with localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

Several studies have investigated the relationship between experience measured by caseload and oncological outcomes, economics, and access to care for prostate cancer care. Oncological outcomes have been limited to biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy. Questions remain regarding the more definitive measures of outcomes and their relationship with caseload.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was used to investigate the outcomes of radical prostatectomy in the United States. With overall survival (OS) as the primary outcome, the relationship between the facility annual caseload (FAC) for all prostate cancer encounters and the facility annual surgical caseload (FASC) for those requiring radical prostatectomy was examined with a Cox proportional hazards model. Four volume groups were defined by caseload: <50th percentile (volume group 1 [VG1]), 50th to 74th percentiles (volume group 2 [VG2]), 75th to 89th percentiles (volume group 3 [VG3]), and ≥90th percentile (volume group 4 [VG4]). By FAC/FASC, 11%/8%, 17%/18%, 25%/26%, and 47%/49% of patients were treated in VG1 through VG4, respectively.

RESULTS

Between 2004 and 2014, 488,389 patients underwent radical prostatectomy. At a median follow-up of 60.75 months, the median OS was not reached. There was a significant OS benefit as the caseload increased. For FAC, the adjusted OS difference between VG1 and VG4 at 90th percentile survivorship reached 13.2 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.30; 95% CI, 1.23-1.36; P < .0001). For FASC, this was 11.3 months (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.192-1.321; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a statistically significant OS advantage from performing radical prostatectomy at a facility with a high annual caseload. Caseload measured by all prostate cancer encounters is a better predictor of favorable outcomes than the number of surgeries performed at a facility.

LAY SUMMARY

An in-depth analysis of 488,389 cases of radical prostatectomy performed in more than 1000 facilities over a 10-year period showed better survival when surgery was performed in facilities with more experience and greater caseload. A survival difference of up to 13 months was observed when comparing patients treated at less experienced versus more experienced centers.   Experience across all stages of prostate cancer was a stronger predictor of survival outcome than just the number of surgeries performed.

Phase II trial of metronomic capecitabine and cyclophosphamide with lapatinib and trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer

e12508

Background: Metronomic chemotherapy is an emerging paradigm of cancer therapy in which low doses of chemotherapy are delivered at frequent intervals. Activity in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has been demonstrated in several phase II clinical trials. Methods: We proposed a regimen with metronomic chemotherapy and dual HER2 inhibition in HER2 positive patients with MBC. We hypothesized that this regimen will be highly active in MBC and have a favorable toxicity profile. Patients were treated on a 21-day cycle with capecitabine 1500mg PO daily, cyclophosphamide 50mg daily, lapatinib 1000mg PO daily and trastuzumab 6mg/kg IV once per 21-day cycle. This regimen was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), overall survival (OS), and safety and tolerability of this regimen. Eligibility criteria were patients 18 years of age and older who had histologically confirmed HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with prior trastuzumab use in the adjuvant or metastatic setting with no more than two prior regimens for MBC. Results: Ten patients were accrued from Jan 2014-Oct 2016. Median age was 52 (range 38 - 79) years. Median number of chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease was 0.5 (range 0-2). Median PFS was 13.7 (95% CI: 2.6, 16.6) months. Median OS was 29.6 (95% CI: 11.8, 60.5+) months. ORR was 30%, and CBR was 70%. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities were identified in 6 patients. The most common toxicities of any grade were fatigue (100%), diarrhea (80%), anemia, neutropenia, ALT increase, nausea and hand-foot syndrome 50% each. One patient achieved CR for over 3 years and continues on treatment at time of this report. 8 patients progressed and 1 patient withdrew from study without response evaluation. The trial was closed due to lack of accrual. Conclusions: The proposed regimen of metronomic capecitabine and cyclophosphamide with lapatinib and trastuzumab appears to be active in patients with HER2 positive MBC but with significant toxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT01873833.

Randomized Phase II Trial of Abiraterone Alone or With Dasatinib in Men With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)

BACKGROUND

Signaling via the Src pathway is thought to be a mediator of resistance to androgen targeted therapy in prostate cancer. We studied whether adding the Src inhibitor dasatinib to abiraterone would delay progression.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), without prior chemotherapy. Abiraterone was prescribed at 1000 mg daily with prednisone 5 mg twice daily in both arms, and dasatinib 100 mg daily was added for Arm B. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The interim analysis was planned after 48 subjects, but the study was terminated early. PFS was evaluated using a 1-sided log rank test. The Fisher exact test was used for other categorical data analyses. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were identified with the Epic platform.

RESULTS

With 26 men randomized and a median follow up of 41.8 months, the median PFS was 15.7 months (95% confidence interval, 8.2-49.0+ months) for Arm B and 9.0 months (95% confidence interval, 4.4-30.7 months) for Arm A (P = .15). Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors responses were seen in 5 (36%) of 14 patients, including 2 complete responses (CRs) on Arm B, and 2 (17%) of 12 responses without CR on Arm A (P = .39). Grade ≥ 3 toxicities more common in Arm B included hypertension, pleural effusion/dyspnea, and gastrointestinal effects. CTCs were detected at baseline in 10 of 19 evaluable patients (median, 2.7/mL blood [range 0.41-59.7]). At week 4, CTCs increased in 1 (10%) of 10 patients on Arm A and 4 (44%) of 9 patients on Arm B.

CONCLUSION

Dasatinib did not significantly prolong PFS in combination with abiraterone, although power was limited owing to the incomplete study cohort. Treatment with the combination was associated with robust objective responses, including Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors CRs.

Biliary tract cancers and the associated risk of venous thromboembolism

304

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. Because biliary tract cancers (BTC) cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder (GB) cancer are uncommon, the incidence of VTE in this population are not well-described. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with BTC identified by the cancer registry at the Los Angeles County-University of Southern California (USC) Medical Center, USC Norris Cancer Center, and USC Keck Hospital between January 2011 to December 2016 to describe the incidence of VTE. 330 BTC patients’ medical records were reviewed for demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment history, and VTE events. 41 patients were excluded due to incomplete records/follow-up. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from date of diagnosis to date of death or last follow-up. Logrank test was used to evaluate the association of VTE with OS. Results: 289 patients with BTC were identified (177 cholangiocarcinoma, 112 GB) with a median follow-up period of 16.7 (0.3-89.0) months (mo). 169 (58%) were women. The median age at diagnosis of 66 years (range 22-89). 144 (59%) underwent cancer surgery and 274 (95%) received chemotherapy. 65 (22%) patients had VTE events: 22 pulmonary embolism [PE] with or without lower extremity (LE) deep vein thrombosis [DVT], 15 with LE DVT alone, three with upper extremity DVT, and 30 with visceral thrombosis (27 portal vein thrombosis [PVT] with or without inferior vena cava thrombosis [IVC], 2 IVC thrombosis, two hepatic vein thrombosis). Five patients had both DVT/PE and visceral thrombosis. The median time from cancer diagnosis to VTE event was not met. Patients with a PVT or any visceral thrombosis had an inferior OS compared to those without (PVT: median OS 16.2 mo [95% CI 12.2-25.8] versus 7.5 [3.4-14.2], p = 0.10, visceral thrombosis: 17.0 mo [95% CI 11.8-25.9] versus 8.4 [95% CI 3.7-14.3], p = 0.30). There was a non-significant trend towards inferior OS in patients with any VTE event type (median OS 17.0 mo [95% CI 11.8-39.0] versus 11.4 [95% CI 7.2-18.4], p = 0.10). There was no difference in OS for patients with PE/DVT compared to those without. Conclusions: VTE is commonly observed in patients with BTC. Visceral thrombosis is associated with inferior survival in patients with BTC.

Phase II Trial of Alisertib in Combination with Irinotecan and Temozolomide for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma

PURPOSE

In phase I testing, alisertib tablets with irinotecan and temozolomide showed significant antitumor activity in patients with neuroblastoma. This study sought to confirm activity of this regimen; evaluate an alisertib oral solution; and evaluate biomarkers of clinical outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a two-stage phase II trial of alisertib tablets (60 mg/m²/dose × 7 days), irinotecan (50 mg/m²/dose i.v. × 5 days), and temozolomide (100 mg/m²/dose orally × 5 days) in patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma. The primary endpoint was best objective response. A separate cohort was treated with alisertib at 45 mg/m² using oral solution instead of tablets. Exploratory analyses sought to identify predictors of toxicity, response, and progression-free survival (PFS) using pooled data from phase I, phase II, and oral solution cohorts.

RESULTS

Twenty and 12 eligible patients were treated in the phase II and oral solution cohorts, respectively. Hematologic toxicities were the most common adverse events. In phase II, partial responses were observed in 19 evaluable patients (21%). The estimated PFS at 1 year was 34%. In the oral solution cohort, 3 patients (25%) had first cycle dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Alisertib oral solution at 45 mg/m² had significantly higher median C _max and exposure compared with tablets at 60 mg/m². Higher alisertib trough concentration was associated with first cycle DLT, whereas MYCN amplification was associated with inferior PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

This combination shows antitumor activity, particularly in patients with MYCN nonamplified tumors. Data on an alisertib oral solution expand the population able to be treated with this agent.

Phase I study of vorinostat in combination with isotretinoin in patients with refractory/recurrent neuroblastoma: A new approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy (NANT) trial

BACKGROUND

Vorinostat combined with retinoids produces additive antitumor effects in preclinical studies of neuroblastoma. Higher systemic exposures of vorinostat than achieved in pediatric phase I trials with continuous daily dosing are necessary for in vivo increased histone acetylation and cytotoxic activity. We conducted a phase I trial in children with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vorinostat on an interrupted schedule, escalating beyond the previously identified pediatric MTD.

METHODS

Isotretinoin (cis-13-retinoic acid) 80 mg/m² /dose was administered by mouth twice daily on days 1-14 in combination with escalating doses of daily vorinostat up to 430 mg/m² /dose (days 1-4; 8-11) in each 28-day cycle using the standard 3 + 3 design. Vorinostat pharmacokinetic testing and histone acetylation assays were performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients with refractory or relapsed neuroblastoma were enrolled and 28 were evaluable for dose escalation decisions. Median number of cycles completed was two (range 1-15); 11 patients received four or more cycles. Three patients experienced cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities. A total of 18 patients experienced grade 3/4 toxicities related to study therapy. The maximum intended dose of vorinostat (430 mg/m² /day, days 1-4; 8-11) was tolerable and led to increased histone acetylation in surrogate tissues when compared to lower doses of vorinostat (P = 0.009). No objective responses were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased dose vorinostat (430 mg/m² /day) on an interrupted schedule is tolerable in combination with isotretinoin. This dose led to increased vorinostat exposures and demonstrated increased histone acetylation. Prolonged stable disease in patients with minimal residual disease warrants further investigation.

Immune-related adverse events (irAE) in GU cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

422

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), particularly PD-1 and PD-L1 antibodies, prolong survival in advanced renal cell (RCC) and urothelial cancer (UC) patients. However, they can cause a variety of serious irAE. We assessed frequency and onset of irAE at experienced centers, and evaluated whether baseline characteristics were associated with irAE. Methods: Pharmacy and clinic schedules identified RCC and UC patients treated with ICI at USC Norris (n = 51) and UCLA (n = 26) from 2014-2016. Prior radiation was defined as completion within 3 months before ICI. Fisher’s exact 2-tailed test was used to evaluate for associations of variables with irAE. Results: 77 patients median age 69 years (49-93) received ICI, 31 with RCC and 46 with UC; 36 received atezolizumab, 29 nivolumab, 9 pembrolizumab, 2 durvalumab, and 1 avelumab. 25 (32.5%) had irAE including pneumonitis (4%), myositis (3%), neurologic event (1%), hepatitis (8%), colitis (1%), rash (8%), endocrinopathy (6%), or hematologic event (1%). 11 (14%) required steroids, 3 (4%) required more intense immunosuppression (infliximab), 1 died of complications from irAE (pneumonitis). 5 were rechallenged with ICI after irAE resolution. Median time to onset of irAEs was 15 weeks; earliest onset of irAE (non-dermatologic) was 3 days after 1st dose, latest onset was 112 weeks. Associations of irAE with variables are listed in the table. Conclusions: irAE were more common in our experience than in published datasets, especially endocrine events, and could occur after the first dose. There was an association between irAE and allergy to antibiotics as well as external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) within 3 months before ICI therapy. [Table: see text]

Phase I Study of Fenretinide Delivered Intravenously in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Hematologic Malignancies: A California Cancer Consortium Trial

Purpose: A phase I study was conducted to determine the MTD, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and pharmacokinetics of fenretinide delivered as an intravenous emulsion in relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies.Experimental Design: Fenretinide (80-1,810 mg/m²/day) was administered by continuous infusion on days 1 to 5, in 21-day cycles, using an accelerated titration design.Results: Twenty-nine patients, treated with a median of three prior regimens (range, 1-7), were enrolled and received the test drug. Ninety-seven courses were completed. An MTD was reached at 1,280 mg/m²/day for 5 days. Course 1 DLTs included 6 patients with hypertriglyceridemia, 4 of whom were asymptomatic; 2 patients experienced DLT thrombocytopenia (asymptomatic). Of 11 patients with response-evaluable peripheral T-cell lymphomas, two had complete responses [CR, progression-free survival (PFS) 68+ months; unconfirmed CR, PFS 14+ months], two had unconfirmed partial responses (unconfirmed PR, PFS 5 months; unconfirmed PR, PFS 6 months), and five had stable disease (2-12 cycles). One patient with mature B-cell lymphoma had an unconfirmed PR sustained for two cycles. Steady-state plasma levels were approximately 10 mcg/mL (mid-20s μmol/L) at 640 mg/m²/day, approximately 14 mcg/mL (mid-30s μmol/L) at 905 mg/m²/day, and approximately 22 mcg/mL (mid-50s μmol/L) at 1,280 mg/m²/day.Conclusions: Intravenous fenretinide obtained significantly higher plasma levels than a previous capsule formulation, had acceptable toxicities, and evidenced antitumor activity in peripheral T-cell lymphomas. A recommended phase II dosing is 600 mg/m² on day 1, followed by 1,200 mg/m² on days 2 to 5, every 21 days. A registration-enabling phase II study in relapsed/refractory PTCL (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02495415) is ongoing. Clin Cancer Res; 23(16); 4550-5. ©2017 AACR.

Randomized phase II trial of abiraterone +/- dasatinib for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

167

Background: Signaling via Src pathway is thought to be a mediator of resistance to androgen targeted therapy in mCRPC. We sought to determine whether adding the Src inhibitor dasatinib (Das) to abiraterone (Abi) would prolong progression free survival (PFS). Methods: Eligible patients had mCRPC which had progressed on androgen targeted therapies but no prior chemotherapy. Abi was prescribed at 1000 mg daily with prednisone 5 mg BID (both arms) and Das 100 mg daily added for Arm B. Primary endpoint was PFS at 24 weeks. Interim analysis planned after 48 subjects randomized but study terminated early due to lack of funding. PFS was evaluated using logrank testing and responses were compared using Fisher’s exact test. Circulating tumor cells (CTC) were evaluated with EPIC platform. Results: 26 men were randomized, 14 to Abi+Das and 12 to Abi. Median age was 67 (56-85), baseline PSA 19.8 (0.84-1387). Only 1 patient had received ketoconazole, none had received enzalutamide. With 30 months median follow-up, median PFS was 15.7 (95% CI:8.2, 31.1+) months for Abi+Das and 9 (95% CI: 4.4, 45.6+) months for Abi (p = 0.30). 86% were progression free at 24 weeks with Abi+Das compared to 75% on Abi. RECIST responses were seen in 5/14 (35%, 95% CI: 17%, 66%) with 2 CR on Abi+Das and 1/12 (8%, 95% CI (0%, 37%) on Abi (p = 0.16). With a specificity of 83%, the probability that the true rate of CR in intervention arm is higher or doubled (ex: 35% vs 17%) is 71%. Grade > 3 toxicities more common on Das arm included hypertension (43% vs 8% Abi), pleural effusion/dyspnea (14% vs 0 Abi), and gastrointestinal (25% vs 8%). CTC were detected at baseline in 8/17 evaluable patients (3/8 Abi, 5/9 Abi+Das), median 2.7 CTC/mL blood (range 0.5-59.7) At week 4, CTC increased in 1/8 (12.5%) on Abi vs 4/9 (44.4%) on Abi+Das but by week 12 CTC increases persisted in 2/8 (25%) on Abi and 1/9 (11%) on Abi+Das. Conclusions: Das did not significantly prolong PFS in combination with Abi although power was limited due to incomplete study cohort. Abi+Das was associated with robust objective responses including RECIST CR. Clinical trial information: NCT01685125.

A Phase I New Approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy Study of Buthionine Sulfoximine and Melphalan With Autologous Stem Cells for Recurrent/Refractory High-Risk Neuroblastoma

BACKGROUND

Myeloablative therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma commonly includes melphalan. Increased cellular glutathione (GSH) can mediate melphalan resistance. Buthionine sulfoximine (BSO), a GSH synthesis inhibitor, enhances melphalan activity against neuroblastoma cell lines, providing the rationale for a Phase 1 trial of BSO-melphalan.

PROCEDURES

Patients with recurrent/resistant high-risk neuroblastoma received BSO (3 gram/m(2) bolus, then 24 grams/m(2) /day infusion days -4 to -2), with escalating doses of intravenous melphalan (20-125 mg/m(2) ) days -3 and -2, and autologous stem cells day 0 using 3 + 3 dose escalation.

RESULTS

Among 28 patients evaluable for dose escalation, one dose-limiting toxicity occurred at 20 mg/m(2) melphalan (grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase) and one at 80 mg/m(2) (streptococcal bacteremia, grade 4 hypotension/pulmonary/hypocalcemia) without sequelae. Among 25 patients evaluable for response, there was one partial response (PR) and two mixed responses (MRs) among eight patients with prior melphalan exposure; one PR and three MRs among 16 patients without prior melphalan; one stable disease with unknown melphalan history. Melphalan pharmacokinetics with BSO were similar to reports for melphalan alone. Melphalan Cmax for most patients was below the 10 μM concentration that showed neuroblastoma preclinical activity with BSO.

CONCLUSIONS

BSO (75 gram/m(2) ) with melphalan (125 mg/m(2) ) is tolerable with stem cell support and active in recurrent/refractory neuroblastoma. Further dose escalation is feasible and may increase responses.

Safety and feasibility of fasting in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy

Background

Short-term starvation prior to chemotherapy administration protects mice against toxicity. We undertook dose-escalation of fasting prior to platinum-based chemotherapy to determine safety and feasibility in cancer patients.

Methods

3 cohorts fasted before chemotherapy for 24, 48 and 72 h (divided as 48 pre-chemo and 24 post-chemo) and recorded all calories consumed. Feasibility was defined as ≥ 3/6 subjects in each cohort consuming ≤ 200 kcal per 24 h during the fast period without excess toxicity. Oxidative stress was evaluated in leukocytes using the COMET assay. Insulin, glucose, ketones, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs) were measured as biomarkers of the fasting state.

Results

The median age of our 20 subjects was 61, and 85 % were women. Feasibility criteria were met. Fasting-related toxicities were limited to ≤ grade 2, most commonly fatigue, headache, and dizziness. The COMET assay indicated reduced DNA damage in leukocytes from subjects who fasted for ≥48 h (p = 0.08). There was a non-significant trend toward less grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in the 48 and 72 h cohorts compared to 24 h cohort (p = 0.17). IGF-1 levels decreased by 30, 33 and 8 % in the 24, 48 and 72 h fasting cohorts respectively after the first fasting period.

Conclusion

Fasting for 72 h around chemotherapy administration is safe and feasible for cancer patients. Biomarkers such as IGF-1 may facilitate assessment of differences in chemotherapy toxicity in subgroups achieving the physiologic fasting state. An onging randomized trial is studying the effect of 72 h of fasting.

Trial registration

NCT00936364, registered propectively on July 9, 2009.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2370-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Phase I Study of the Aurora A Kinase Inhibitor Alisertib in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma: A NANT (New Approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy) Trial

PURPOSE

Alisertib is an oral Aurora A kinase inhibitor with preclinical activity in neuroblastoma. Irinotecan and temozolomide have activity in patients with advanced neuroblastoma. The goal of this phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of alisertib with irinotecan and temozolomide in this population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients age 1 to 30 years with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma were eligible. Patients received alisertib tablets at dose levels of 45, 60, and 80 mg/m(2) per day on days 1 to 7 along with irinotecan 50 mg/m(2) intravenously and temozolomide 100 mg/m(2) orally on days 1 to 5. Dose escalation of alisertib followed the rolling six design. Samples for pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenomic testing were obtained.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients enrolled, and 22 were eligible and evaluable for dose escalation. A total of 244 courses were administered. The MTD for alisertib was 60 mg/m(2), with mandatory myeloid growth factor support and cephalosporin prophylaxis for diarrhea. Thrombocytopenia and neutropenia of any grade were seen in the majority of courses (84% and 69%, respectively). Diarrhea in 55% of courses and nausea in 54% of courses were the most common nonhematologic toxicities. The overall response rate was 31.8%, with a 50% response rate observed at the MTD. The median number of courses per patient was eight (range, two to 32). Progression-free survival rate at 2 years was 52.4%. Pharmacokinetic testing did not show evidence of drug-drug interaction between irinotecan and alisertib.

CONCLUSION

Alisertib 60 mg/m(2) per dose for 7 days is tolerable with a standard irinotecan and temozolomide backbone and has promising response and progression-free survival rates. A phase II trial of this regimen is ongoing.

Phase I Study of Vorinostat as a Radiation Sensitizer with 131I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine (131I-MIBG) for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma

PURPOSE

(131)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) is a radiopharmaceutical with activity in neuroblastoma. Vorinostat is a histone deacetylase inhibitor that has radiosensitizing properties. The goal of this phase I study was to determine the MTDs of vorinostat and MIBG in combination.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients ≤ 30 years with relapsed/refractory MIBG-avid neuroblastoma were eligible. Patients received oral vorinostat (dose levels 180 and 230 mg/m(2)) daily days 1 to 14. MIBG (dose levels 8, 12, 15, and 18 mCi/kg) was given on day 3 and peripheral blood stem cells on day 17. Alternating dose escalation of vorinostat and MIBG was performed using a 3+3 design.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients enrolled to six dose levels, with 23 evaluable for dose escalation. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were seen in the first three dose levels. At dose level 4 (15 mCi/kg MIBG/230 mg/m(2) vorinostat), 1 of 6 patients had DLT with grade 4 hypokalemia. At dose level 5 (18 mCi/kg MIBG/230 mg/m(2) vorinostat), 2 patients had dose-limiting bleeding (one grade 3 and one grade 5). At dose level 5a (18 mCi/kg MIBG/180 mg/m(2) vorinostat), 0 of 6 patients had DLT. The most common toxicities were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. The response rate was 12% across all dose levels and 17% at dose level 5a. Histone acetylation increased from baseline in peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected on days 3 and 12 to 14.

CONCLUSIONS

Vorinostat at 180 mg/m(2)/dose is tolerable with 18 mCi/kg MIBG. A phase II trial comparing this regimen to single-agent MIBG is ongoing.

Dose escalation study of no-carrier-added 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine for relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma: new approaches to neuroblastoma therapy consortium trial

(131)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) is specifically taken up in neuroblastoma, with a response rate of 20%-37% in relapsed disease. Nonradioactive carrier MIBG molecules inhibit uptake of (131)I-MIBG, theoretically resulting in less tumor radiation and increased risk of cardiovascular toxicity. Our aim was to establish the maximum tolerated dose of no-carrier-added (NCA) (131)I-MIBG, with secondary aims of assessing tumor and organ dosimetry and overall response.

METHODS

Eligible patients were 1-30 y old with resistant neuroblastoma, (131)I-MIBG uptake, and cryopreserved hematopoietic stem cells. A diagnostic dose of NCA (131)I-MIBG was followed by 3 dosimetry scans to assess radiation dose to critical organs and soft-tissue tumors. The treatment dose of NCA (131)I-MIBG (specific activity, 165 MBq/μg) was adjusted as necessary on the basis of critical organ tolerance limits. Autologous hematopoietic stem cells were infused 14 d after therapy to abrogate prolonged myelosuppression. Response and toxicity were evaluated on day 60. The NCA (131)I-MIBG was escalated from 444 to 777 MBq/kg (12-21 mCi/kg) using a 3 + 3 design. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was failure to reconstitute neutrophils to greater than 500/μL within 28 d or platelets to greater than 20,000/μL within 56 d, or grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0) except for predefined exclusions.

RESULTS

Three patients each were evaluable at 444, 555, and 666 MBq/kg without DLT. The dose of 777 MBq/kg dose was not feasible because of organ dosimetry limits; however, 3 assigned patients were evaluable for a received dose of 666 MBq/kg, providing a total of 6 patients evaluable for toxicity at 666 MBq/kg without DLT. Mean whole-body radiation was 0.23 mGy/MBq, and mean organ doses were 0.92, 0.82, and 1.2 mGy/MBq of MIBG for the liver, lung, and kidney, respectively. Eight patients had 13 soft-tissue lesions with tumor-absorbed doses of 26-378 Gy. Four of 15 patients had a complete (n = 1) or partial (n = 3) response, 1 had a mixed response, 4 had stable disease, and 6 had progressive disease.

CONCLUSION

NCA (131)I-MIBG with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation is feasible at 666 MBq/kg without significant nonhematologic toxicity and with promising activity.

A phase I trial of AEZS-108 in castration- and taxane-resistant prostate cancer

e15153

Background: The prognosis for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remains suboptimal and targeted therapies should be explored. One potential target is the receptor for luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH), which is highly expressed on prostate cancer cells. AEZS-108 is an LHRH-cytotoxic hybrid whose rational design covalently couples an LHRH agonist and the cytotoxic doxorubicin. AEZS-108 exploits the presence of LHRH receptors to target delivery of the cytotoxic. We report the phase I trial of AEZS-108 in men with taxane-resistant CRPC. We also report correlative studies of a novel circulating tumor cell (CTC) capture device that will provide enumeration of CTCs and results from AEZS-108 internalization studies that exploit the auto-fluorescence of doxorubicin in captured CTCs. Methods: This is a single-arm, dose-escalation phase I study in men with CRPC to confirm the dose established in a completed phase I trial in females. Eligibility criteria included adequate organ function and progression of disease despite prior therapy with an LHRH agonist and at least one taxane-based regimen. Patients were required to discontinue LHRH agonists to avoid receptor competition. Due to potential cardiotoxicity, patients with an ejection fraction < 50% or prior exposure to doxorubicin or mitoxantrone were excluded. Pituitary function was closely monitored. Patients received AEZS-108 every 21 days for up to 6 cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was safety. Results: Enrollment began in November 2010 and is ongoing. Currently, 13 patients have been enrolled. The first two planned dose levels had no dose-limiting toxicities observed. Two patients on the third dose level experienced a dose limiting toxicity. The second dose level has been reopened for expansion. There have been no cardiac or pituitary toxicities. At the time of submission, a decrease in PSA was noted in 6 of the 13 patients. Final results detailing safety, response and the suggested dose for the phase II portion will be reported. All correlative studies will also be reported. Conclusions: In general, AEZS-108 has been well tolerated. The phase II portion of the study will begin once the MTD is established.

Phase I study of vincristine, irinotecan, and ¹³¹I-metaiodobenzylguanidine for patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma: a new approaches to neuroblastoma therapy trial

PURPOSE

(131)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) is a targeted radiopharmaceutical with activity in patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma. Irinotecan is a known radiosensitizer with activity in neuroblastoma. This phase I study aimed to determine the recommended phase 2 dose of MIBG together with fixed doses of vincristine and irinotecan.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients 1 to 30 years old with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma and MIBG-avid tumors were eligible. All patients had autologous hematopoietic stem cells (PBSC) available and met standard phase I organ function requirements. Irinotecan (20 mg/m(2)/dose IV) was given on days 0 to 4 and 7 to 11, with vincristine (1.5 mg/m(2) IV) on days 0 and 7. MIBG was given on day 1 following a 3 + 3 phase I dose escalation design starting at 8 mCi/kg MIBG. PBSCs were administered at dose level 8 mCi/kg for prolonged myelosuppression and for all patients at 12 mCi/kg or more.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients evaluable for dose escalation (median age, 6.7 years; range, 1.9-26.8 years) received 1 (n = 17), 2 (n = 5), or 3 (n = 2) cycles of therapy. Myelosuppression and diarrhea were the most common toxicities. Two of 6 patients at the 18 mCi/kg dose level had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), including one with protocol-defined DLT with prolonged mild aspartate aminotransferase elevation. Eighteen mCi/kg was the recommended phase 2 dose. Six additional patients were treated at 18 mCi/kg, with one additional DLT. Responses (2 complete and 4 partial responses) occurred in 6 of 24 (25%) evaluable patients.

CONCLUSIONS

MIBG is tolerable and active at 18 mCi/kg with standard doses of vincristine and irinotecan.

Unmethylated E-cadherin gene expression is significantly associated with metastatic human prostate cancer cells in bone

BACKGROUND

The concurrent determination of methylation status of E-cadherin gene and E-cadherin protein expression remains scant in metastatic prostate cancer cells in bone, the most prevalent site for metastatic growth. Therefore, the study was undertaken to ascertain the methylation status of E-cadherin gene, a most frequent and known epigenetic mechanism of its regulation, and the protein expression in prostate tissue biopsy specimen.

METHODS

The methylation of E-cadherin gene was determined by methylation specific-PCR and the protein expression by immunohistochemical method in the consecutive sections of each prostate tissue biopsy specimen.

RESULTS

The unmethylated E-cadherin gene and homogeneous E-cadherin protein expression was significantly associated with BPH as compared to the primary prostate carcinoma (Fisher's Exact P < 0.001). A significant association was observed between the concurrent methylated gene and markedly reduced expression of the protein in the primary prostate cancer cells as compared to the BPH cells, suggesting methylation-dependent regulation of the gene expression in these cases. In contrast to the primary cancer, a highly significant increase in the frequency of metastatic prostate cancer cells in bone exhibited the concurrent expression of unmethylated gene and homogeneous protein (Fisher's Exact P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The study clearly demonstrated a significant association of the concurrent expression of unmethylated E-cadherin gene and E-cadherin protein with metastatic prostate cancer cells in bone, and that its expression may have a role in the intercellular adhesion in the formation of metastatic lesions in bone.

Overexpression of E-cadherin and beta-catenin proteins in metastatic prostate cancer cells in bone

BACKGROUND

The expression of E-cadherin in the intercellular adhesion of metastatic prostate cancer cells in bone, which is the most prevalent site of metastatic growth, remains elusive.

METHODS

The aim of the study was to compare the concurrent membranous expression of E-cadherin and beta-catenin proteins, the state which is known to be associated with the cellular adhesion function of E-cadherin, in prostate biopsy tissue specimens by immunohistochemical staining method. The expression patterns of E-cadherin or beta-catenin were classified as homogeneous (most cells exhibiting positively), heterogeneous (a few scattered patches of cells with positivity) or negative.

RESULTS

Benign prostate hyperplasia cells exhibited homogeneous expression of both E-cadherin and beta-catenin in 9 of 11 (82%), whereas the primary prostate cancer cells were homogeneously positive for both proteins only in 4 of 22 (18%) of the cases. The results are similar to those reported in literature. However, in contrast to the primary cancer, a significantly increased frequency of the metastatic prostate cancer cells in bone exhibited homogeneous expression of E-cadherin and beta-catenin in 12 of 17 (71%) of the cases. A statistically significant association was observed between the overexpression of both proteins and the metastatic prostate cancer cells in bone (Fisher's exact P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The result of the study demonstrated for the first time that the membranous overexpression of E-cadherin and beta-catenin are significantly associated with the metastatic prostate cancer cells in bone and that the high frequency of expression suggest their involvement in the intercellular adhesion of the metastatic cells in bone.

Increased late toxicity in 12–20 year survivors of germ cell tumors (GCT)

4509

Background: There is extensive literature on occurrence of late effects of cisplatin-based chemotherapy, but it comes from centers of excellence and may reflect case selection or ascertainment biases. Funded by the NIH SEER Program and the Lance Armstrong Foundation, we studied community-based late outcomes via identification of cases from the Los Angeles SEER Tumor Registry and comparison with a control group. Methods: We identified 951 patients treated in Los Angeles County through the records of the L.A. SEER Cancer Registry/Cancer Surveillance Program (CSP) for 1983–1987, giving a minimum follow-up of 12 years. Consent was obtained from physician of record and forms sent to the patients, requesting information about a broad range of demographic, treatment-related and psycho-social issues. In addition, patients were asked to provide a “control”, a friend of approximately the same age at time of diagnosis, known to the patient before diagnosis and known not to have a history of testis cancer. Questionnaires were also sent to controls, to allow data comparison with patients. Anticipated initial difficulties included mobility of young males and invalid addresses. This occurred in > 50% of cases, and we used a planned strategy for acquisition through State agencies, Department of Motor Vehicles, etc. Results: Surveys were returned by 298 cases and 67 control subjects, and 35 patients refused. In 1983–87, success rates were lower, and 142 patients had died. An unexpected problem was reluctance or inability of subjects to identify friends of comparable age to provide a control population. Differences in groups are summarized in the Table. Conclusions: Long term survivors with GCT have an excess of late toxicity, including cardiovascular, neurological, hematologic, musculoskeletal and neoplastic problems, which increase with time. These data should assist in design of surveillance protocols.

[Table: see text]

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Digital camera assessment for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in rural El Salvador

OBJECTIVE

To explore the feasibility of digital photography for primary cervical cancer screening in a low-resource setting in El Salvador.

METHODS

Three independent examiners performed Pap test, visual inspection, digital camera assessment and colposcopy on each subject.

RESULTS

Lesions were detected in 99 of 504 patients (20%) by visual inspection, 72/504 (14%) by DART and 90/504 (18%) by colposcopic impression. Seven of 504 patients (1.3%) had CIN on histology. Pap detected 2 of 7 subjects (29% sensitivity) (C.I. 4%, 56%), visual inspection detected 5 of 7 (71% sensitivity, C.I. 34%, 95%), digital assessment detected 6 of 7 (86% sensitivity C. I. 45%, 99%), and colposcopic impression detected 5 of 7 (71% sensitivity, C.I. 34%, 95%).

CONCLUSION

This small pilot trial demonstrates the potential value and feasibility of performing digital camera assessment of the reproductive tract on women in a developing country setting.

PHASE II TRIAL OF TESMILIFENE PLUS MITOXANTRONE AND PREDNISONE FOR HORMONE REFRACTORY PROSTATE CANCER: HIGH SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE RESPONSE IN PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC METASTASES

PURPOSE

Symptomatic, hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRCAP) is a major cause of morbidity with a median survival of less than 12 months and a 2-year survival of only up to 10% in most series. Mitoxantrone has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for HRCAP. Preliminary data suggest that DPPE (N,N-diethyl-2-[4-(phenylmethyl) phenoxy]-ethanamine) or tesmilifene modulates cytotoxics to enhance the anticancer effect. In this phase II trial we assessed whether there is sufficient evidence of enhanced efficacy of DPPE and mitoxantrone to lead to a phase III clinical trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 29 patients with a median age of 73 years, of whom 10% were older than 80 years, with progressive HRCAP received 5.3 mg/kg DPPE intravenously every 3 weeks, 12 mg/m mitoxantrone intravenously every weeks and 5 mg prednisone orally twice daily. All patients had pain at presentation, while 97% had bone metastases, 10% had liver metastases and 17% had lung metastases. Median prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 210 ng/ml (IQR 77 to 430).

RESULTS

Of the patients 75% had some pain improvement, 66% had decreased analgesia, 59% had a PSA decrease of 50% or greater and 45% had a PSA decrease of 75% or greater. Actual (not actuarial) 2-year survival was 21%.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite major limitations of historical comparison the PSA decrease and decreased symptoms with DPPE-mitoxantrone-prednisone compare favorably to those of mitoxantrone-prednisone and docetaxel-estramustine in the literature. The 2-year survival rate of 21% mandates further assessment. This will be tested in a phase III Southwest Oncology Group trial.

Neoplastic meningitis-related encephalopathy

BACKGROUND

A retrospective comparison evaluating survival in two well-matched cohorts of patients with cytologically positive neoplastic meningitis (NM) presenting with or without encephalopathy.

METHODS

Two cohorts were studied: 20 with and 20 without of NM-related encephalopathy defined as a confusional syndrome. Cohorts were matched with respect to age, primary tumor, performance status, absence of CSF compartmentalization and absence of neuroradiographic bulky CNS disease. Primary tumor histology included the following: breast(10 patients); non-small cell lung cancer (8); non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (8); colorectal cancer (6); melanoma (4); small cell lung cancer (2); prostate cancer (2). NM at presentation revealed: encephalopathy (20 patients); spinal cord dysfunction (18); and cranial neuropathy (15). Radiotherapy was administered to 31 patients (whole brain only in 17 patients; restricted spine only in 8 patients; whole brain and restricted spine in 6 patients). All patients received intraventricular chemotherapy and 16 patients received concurrent tumor-specific systemic chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Median survival was 2.5 months (range 1.5-5 months) in the cohort with NM-related encephalopathy compared to 6 months (range: 2-10 months) in the cohort without NM-related encephalopathy (p < 0.001). No treatment-related deaths were observed. All patients demonstrated progressive disease and died of either NM or systemic cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

NM-related encephalopathy is a clinical variable that predicts for poor survival in patients with NM. As a consequence, patients with NM-related encephalopathy may be best served by offering supportive care.

Downregulation of TS, DPD, ERCC1, GST-Pi, EGFR, and HER2 gene expression after neoadjuvant three-modality treatment in patients with esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

To find out if neoadjuvant therapy could alter tumor response determinants that might affect tumor sensitivity to the treatment, we investigated intratumoral expressions of genes associated with chemosensitivity, radiosensitivity, or both before and after radiochemotherapy.

STUDY DESIGN

Twenty-four patients with locally advanced, resectable esophageal cancer (cT2-4,Nx,M0) received neoadjuvant 5-FU/cisplatin/36 Gy treatment followed by transthoracic en bloc esophagectomy. Expression levels of thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, excision repair cross-complementing gene 1 , glutathione S-transferase Pi, epidermal growth factor receptor, and HER2 were measured in matched preradiochemotherapy endoscopic tumor biopsies and in postradiochemotherapy resection specimens. mRNA was isolated from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, laser microdissected tumor tissues, and a quantitative fluorescent dye real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction system was used for gene expression measurement.

RESULTS

There was a significant reduction in the expression levels of thymidylate synthase (p < 0.01), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (p = 0.03), excision repair cross-complementing gene 1 (p < 0.01), glutathione S-transferase Pi (p = 0.03), HER2 (p < 0.01), and epidermal growth factor receptor (p = 0.04). The change in the levels of epidermal growth factor receptor mRNA in post- compared with pretreatment specimens was significantly associated with the histopathologic grade of regression (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The expression levels of a set of genes that are possible determinants of 5-FU/cisplatin/radiation therapy antitumor activity are significantly downregulated by neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in esophageal cancer.

Neoplastic meningitis-related encephalopathy: Prognostic significance

Two cohorts of 20 patients diagnosed with neoplastic meningitis (NM) with or without encephalopathy were matched with respect to age, sex, primary tumor, and performance status. Median survival was 10 weeks (range 6 to 20 weeks) in the cohort with NM-related encephalopathy compared to 24 weeks (range 8 to 40 weeks) in the cohort without NM-related encephalopathy (p < 0.001). NM-related encephalopathy is a clinical variable that predicts for poor survival in patients with NM.