Prognostic significance of BRCA1 expression in Japanese sporadic breast carcinomas

Role played by BRCA1 in transcriptional regulation in response to therapy

BRCA1 (breast-cancer susceptibility gene 1) is a tumour suppressor, implicated in the hereditary predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer. BRCA1 has been implicated in a number of cellular processes including DNA repair and recombination, cell cycle checkpoint control, chromatin remodelling and ubiquitination. In addition, substantial data now exist to suggest a role for BRCA1 in transcriptional regulation; BRCA1 has been shown to interact with the Pol II holoenzyme complex and to interact with multiple transcription factors, such as p53 and c-Myc. We have previously identified a range of BRCA1 transcriptional targets and have linked these to specific cellular pathways, including cell cycle checkpoint activation and apoptosis. Current research is focused on the transcriptional mechanisms that underpin the association of BRCA1 deficiency with increased sensitivity to DNA damage-based chemotherapy and resistance to spindle poisons.

The BRCA1/BRCA2/Rad51 complex is a prognostic and predictive factor in early breast cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 interact with Rad51, one of the central components in the homologous recombination repair pathway. This study evaluates the prognostic and predictive role of BRCA1, BRCA2 and Rad51, individually and as a complex, in breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Expression of BRCA1, BRCA2 and Rad51 was investigated using immunohistochemistry in tumours from 224 women with early breast cancer, who were randomised to receive postoperative radiotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy (CMF).

RESULTS

Fifty-three percent (112/212) of the tumours had reduced expression of the BRCA1/BRCA2/Rad51 complex. Low expression correlated to high histologic grade (p=0.05). Patients with low expression of the complex developed significantly more local recurrences as compared to patients with high expression (RR=3.20, 95% CI 1.48-6.88, p=0.003). Expression of the BRCA1/BRCA2/Rad51 complex was an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (p=0.03). Patients with low expression of the complex responded well to radiotherapy (RR=0.31, 95% CI 0.14-0.70, p=0.005), whereas patients with high expression had few local recurrences and no additional benefit from radiotherapy (RR=1.08, 95% CI 0.40-2.90, p=0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

Low expression of the BRCA1/BRCA2/Rad51 complex is a marker of poor prognosis, but predicts good response to radiotherapy in patients with early breast cancer.

BRCA1 regulates IFN-gamma signaling through a mechanism involving the type I IFNs

BRCA1 encodes a tumor suppressor gene that is mutated in the germ line of women with a genetic predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer. BRCA1 has been implicated in a number of important cellular functions including DNA damage repair, transcriptional regulation, cell cycle control, and ubiquitination. Using an Affymetrix U95A microarray, IRF-7 was identified as a BRCA1 transcriptional target and was also shown to be synergistically up-regulated by BRCA1 specifically in the presence of IFN-gamma, coincident with the synergistic induction of apoptosis. We show that BRCA1, signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)-1, and STAT2 are all required for the induction of IRF-7 following stimulation with IFN-gamma. We also show that the induction of IRF-7 by BRCA1 and IFN-gamma is dependent on the type I IFNs, IFN-alpha and IFN-beta. We show that BRCA1 is required for the up-regulation of STAT1, STAT2, and the type I IFNs in response to IFN-gamma. We show that BRCA1 is localized at the promoters of the molecules involved in type I IFN signaling leading to their up-regulation. Blocking this intermediary type I IFN step using specific antisera shows the requirement for IFN-alpha and IFN-beta in the induction of IRF-7 and apoptosis. Finally, we outline a mechanism for the BRCA1/IFN-gamma regulation of target genes involved in the innate immune response, which is dependent on type I IFN signaling.

BRCA1 , a Potential Predictive Biomarker in the Treatment of Breast Cancer

To date, estrogen receptor, progestogen receptor, and HER2/neu represent molecular biomarkers currently used in routine clinical practice to aid treatment decisions. Over the last few years, a large body of preclinical and retrospective clinical data has accumulated that suggests that BRCA1 mutation functions as a novel predictive marker of response to chemotherapy. This article reviews the role of BRCA1 as a predictive marker of chemotherapy response in breast cancer and examines the link between BRCA1 deficiency and the basal-like phenotype. Search strategy. Data for this article were identified through MEDLINE and PubMed searches for published reports using the terms BRCA1, breast cancer, basal-like, chemotherapy, prognosis, and predictive markers. In some cases, due to the restriction of space, readers are referred to review articles to allow further reading. Only articles published in English were included.

BRCA1--a good predictive marker of drug sensitivity in breast cancer treatment?

There are currently only two predictive markers of response to chemotherapy for breast cancer in routine clinical use, namely the Estrogen receptor-alpha and the HER2 receptor. The breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 is an important genetic factor in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and there is increasing evidence of an important role for BRCA1 in the sporadic forms of both cancer types. Our group and numerous others have shown in both preclinical and clinical studies that BRCA1 is an important determinant of chemotherapy responses in breast cancer. In this review we will outline the current understanding of the role of BRCA1 as a determinant of response to DNA damaging and microtubule damaging chemotherapy. We will then discuss how the known functions of this multifaceted protein may provide mechanistic explanations for its role in chemotherapy responses.

Analysis of Loss of heterozygosity and immunohistochemistry in BRCA1 gene in sporadic breast cancers

BRCA1 is a tumour suppressor gene (TSG), which predisposes cancer to both breast and ovary. The primary objective of the present study is to ascertain the involvement of BRCA1 gene in the pathogenesis of sporadic breast cancer women in Chennai (South India) by analysing its protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) for confirmation of the involvement of TSG in the study population. We found down regulation of BRCA1 protein (54%) in IHC and it was correlated with the clinicopathological parameters of the patients. We found near significant correlation (P < 0.063) between BRCA1 protein expression and clinicopathological parameters. We found 30% LOH in our study and it was also correlated with the clinicopathological parameters. No correlation was found between LOH and clinicopathological parameters. Though we found no correlation, the results revealed in this study support the involvement of BRCA1 TSG in the pathogenesis of sporadic breast cancer women in Chennai (South India).

BRCA1-associated complexes: new targets to overcome breast cancer radiation resistance

Since BRCA1 was cloned a decade ago, significant progress has been made in defining its biochemical and biological functions, as well as its role in breast and ovarian cancers. BRCA1 has been implicated in many cellular processes, including DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoint control, protein ubiquitination and chromatin remodeling. This review examines the role(s) of BRCA1 in mediating these cellular processes, and discusses its potential involvement in the resistance of breast cancer to radiation-based therapies. Finally, the possibility that BRCA1-associated proteins may serve as new targets for breast cancer radiation therapy is explored. The activation or inactivation of these BRCA1-associated proteins may modify both the risk of developing cancers in BRCA1 mutation carriers and the efficacy of breast cancer therapy, including radiation.

Loss of heterozygosity at the BRCA1 locus in Tunisian women with sporadic breast cancer

Breast cancer in Tunisia is characterized by a much higher incidence of aggressiveness compared with Western countries. The pattern of allelic loss at the BRCA1 locus in Tunisian women with breast carcinoma has not been studied. Therefore, the aim of this present preliminary study was mainly focused on loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis of the BRCA1 gene to determine if this tumor suppressor gene is involved in sporadic breast carcinoma among Tunisian women. We investigate allelic losses by analyzing three microsatellite markers in the BRCA1 region, in a panel of 21 human breast tumors. D17S1322 marker had the highest frequency of LOH (59%), followed by the D17S1323 (35%), and EDH-17B (20%). Collectively out of 21 informative cases 13 (62%) showed LOH at at least one BRCA1 locus. This data provides evidence that allelic loss at BRCA1 is a frequent event in sporadic breast tumorigenesis among Tunisian women, and suggests that the BRCA1 gene might play an important role as a tumor suppressor gene.

Model of transcriptional regulation of the BRCA1-NBR2 bi-directional transcriptional unit

In contrast to hundreds of mutations found in familial breast and/or ovarian cancers, somatic mutations of BRCA1 are very rare. However, a high percentage of sporadic breast and ovarian cancers show a reduction in BRCA1 expression, suggesting that defects in transcriptional regulation is a contributing factor. BRCA1 shares a promoter with its neighboring gene, NBR2, which is transcribed in the opposite direction. We have previously shown that the transcription of BRCA1 is negatively regulated by protein factors that interact with a 36-bp segment, located 575 bp into its first intron. We now report the localization of an 18-bp transcriptional repressor element for NBR2, which resides 948 bp into its first intron. The binding of nuclear proteins to this repressor element was detected by electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs), and it conferred an orientation-dependent functional suppression onto a heterologous thymidine kinase promoter. Combined with our previous studies, a model of transcriptional regulation of the closely aligned BRCA1-NBR2 bi-directional unit is proposed. A minimal 56-bp DNA region is functional in driving transcription in both directions, while uni-directional control is provided by distinct repressors that bind to sequences located in the first intron of the respective genes.

Expression of endothelin-1, endothelin-A, and endothelin-B receptor in human breast cancer and correlation with long-term follow-up

PURPOSE

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is overexpressed in breast carcinomas and stimulates tumor cell growth in an autocrine and paracrine fashion via its receptors, ET(A)R and ET(B)R. In this study, we evaluated the expression of ET-1 and ET receptors in breast carcinomas and determined its clinical and prognostic significance.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We analyzed expression of ET-1, ET(A)R, and ET(B)R in 176 breast carcinomas using a semiquantitative immunohistochemical approach. Statistical analysis of clinicopathological variables such as pT stage, pN stage, hormone receptor status, Her-2/neu amplification, histological grade, and long-term follow-up data were performed.

RESULTS

We observed a moderate to strong cytoplasmic staining for ET-1 in 69 (43.1%), for ET(A)R in 74 (46.5%), and for ET(B)R in 86 (53.4%) cases of primary breast cancer. A correlation was found between increased ET-1 expression and its receptors with several clinicopathological parameters that characterize aggressive types of breast cancer, with the exception of increased ET(A)R and ET(B)R expression with positive estrogen receptor status. Elevated expression of ET-1, ET(A)R, and ET(B)R was more common in breast carcinomas of patients with lower disease-free survival time and overall survival. In addition, a statistically significant correlation was observed between ET(A)R expression and reduced disease-free survival time (P = 0.041). Interestingly, the prognostic impact of ET(A)R expression was shown to be more pronounced in the subgroup of patients with a putative favorable prognosis according to classic prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, analysis of ET(A)R expression may improve the prediction of relapse and death and facilitate an individually based risk-directed adjuvant therapy in breast cancer patients.

BRCA1 interacts with and is required for paclitaxel-induced activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 3

BRCA1 has been implicated in a number of cellular processes, including transcriptional regulation, DNA damage repair, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis. We identified mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) kinase kinase 3 (MEKK3), an upstream regulator of the c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase/stress-activated protein kinase and p38/MAPK pathways, as a novel BRCA1-interacting protein in a yeast two-hybrid screen and confirmed the interaction by coimmunoprecipitation in mammalian cells. Deletion mapping demonstrated that amino acids 1611-1863 are required to mediate the interaction with MEKK3 in yeast. BRCA1 disease-associated mutations abrogated the interaction in yeast, and BRCA1 failed to interact with MEKK3 in BRCA1 mutant HCC1937 breast cancer cells. We demonstrate that small interfering RNA-based inhibition of endogenous BRCA1 reduces MEKK3 kinase activity and conversely that inducible expression of BRCA1 activates MEKK3 and p38/MAPK. Finally, we demonstrate using complementary approaches that BRCA1 is required for paclitaxel-induced activation of MEKK3. These data indicate that BRCA1 is a key regulator of the paclitaxel-induced stress response pathway and suggest that the ability of BRCA1 to associate with, and mediate the activation of, MEKK3 represents a potential mechanism through which this pathway is regulated.

Expression of BRCA1 protein in benign, borderline, and malignant epithelial ovarian neoplasms and its relationship to methylation and allelic loss of the BRCA1 gene

BRCA1 is a putative tumour suppressor gene responsible for a hereditary ovarian cancer syndrome. To clarify the possible involvement of BRCA1 in the development of sporadic ovarian neoplasms, this study analysed the immunohistochemical expression of BRCA1 protein in normal ovarian surface epithelium and 119 epithelial ovarian tumours (19 benign, 24 borderline, and 76 malignant tumours). Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of BRCA1 was examined using three microsatellite markers to analyse the relationship between BRCA1 expression and alterations of the BRCA1 gene. Methylation of the BRCA1 promoter was also analysed by methylation-specific PCR. In ovarian carcinomas showing heterogeneous expression of BRCA1 protein in the same tumour, LOH and methylation status were analysed using microdissection techniques. Finally, the relationship of BRCA1 expression or its genetic alteration to clinicopathological parameters and patient survival was analysed. Ovarian surface epithelial cells expressed BRCA1 protein. Decreased expression of BRCA1 was found in 16% of benign tumours, 38% of borderline tumours, and 72% of carcinomas. LOH of BRCA1 was demonstrated in no benign tumours, 15% of borderline tumours, and 66% of carcinomas. Methylation of BRCA1 was not detected in benign or borderline tumours, but was present in 31% of carcinomas. Reduced expression of BRCA1 correlated with the presence of gene methylation. The frequency of BRCA1 methylation and LOH was higher in serous carcinomas than in other types. In one of the three serous carcinomas that showed heterogeneous expression of BRCA1, BRCA1-positive borderline-like tumour cells were LOH-positive and methylation-negative, whereas adjacent BRCA1-negative carcinoma cells were LOH-positive and methylation-positive. The prognosis of carcinoma patients did not correlate with BRCA1 expression or genetic status. These findings suggest that reduced expression of BRCA1 protein along with genetic and epigenetic changes of the BRCA1 gene play an important role in the development of sporadic ovarian carcinomas, particularly those of serous histology.

BRCA1 gene in breast cancer

The BRCA1 gene was identified and cloned in 1994 based its linkage to early onset breast cancer and breast-ovarian cancer syndromes in women. While inherited mutations of BRCA1 are responsible for about 40-45% of hereditary breast cancers, these mutations account for only 2-3% of all breast cancers, since the BRCA1 gene is rarely mutated in sporadic breast cancers. However, BRCA1 expression is frequently reduced or absent in sporadic cancers, suggesting a much wider role in mammary carcinogenesis. Since BRCA1 was cloned in 1994, its molecular function has been the subject of intense investigation. These studies have revealed multiple functions of the BRCA1 that may contribute to its tumor suppressor activity, including roles in: cell cycle progression, several highly specialized DNA repair processes, DNA damage-responsive cell cycle check-points, regulation of a set of specific transcriptional pathways, and apoptosis. Many of these functions are linked to protein:protein interactions involving different portions of the 1,863 amino acid (aa) BRCA1 protein. BRCA1 functions in cell cycle progression and the DNA damage response appear to be regulated by distinct and specific phosphorylation events, but the molecular pathways activated by these phosphorylations are only beginning to be unraveled. In addition, the reason that BRCA1 mutation carriers develop specific tumor types (breast and ovarian cancers in women and possibly prostate cancers in men) is not clearly understood. Elucidation of the precise molecular functions of the BRCA1 gene product will greatly enhance our understanding of the pathogenesis of hereditary as well as sporadic mammary carcinogenesis.

The prognostic impact of hormone receptors and c-erbB-2 in pregnancy-associated breast cancer and their correlation with BRCA1 and cell cycle modulators

A population-based series of 122 patients with pregnancy-associated breast carcinomas was histologically revised and the relationship between hormone receptors, c-erbB-2, BRCA1, p27, cyclin E, and cyclin D1 was studied. The 5-year overall survival was 41%; 70% had tumor size >20 mm; 72% had metastasized to regional lymph nodes; 95% were histologic grade II or III; 66% and 75% were negative for estrogen and progesterone receptor, respectively; and c-erbB-2 expression was high (44%). BRCA1 expression was reduced in 33% of the cases. The expression of p27, cyclin D1, and cyclin E was low, 11%, 9%, and 16%, respectively. Cyclin D1 was positively associated with the hormone receptors (p< or =0.01). In multivariate analysis, lymph node status, progesterone receptor, and c-erbB-2 were significant prognostic factors. In subdividing the group according to lymph node status, c-erbB-2 and progesterone receptor retained a prognostic significance in the node positive group only. In conclusion, pregnancy-associated breast carcinomas are aggressive tumors, with low expression of hormone receptors, BRCA1, p27, and cyclin E and D1, and high expression of c-erbB-2.

Regulation of BRCA1 expression and its relationship to sporadic breast cancer

Germ-line mutations in the BRCA1 tumour suppressor gene contribute to familial breast tumour formation, but there is no evidence for direct mutation of the BRCA1 gene in the sporadic form of the disease. In contrast, decreased expression of the BRCA1 gene has been shown to be common in sporadic tumours, and the magnitude of the decrease correlates with disease progression. BRCA1 expression is also tightly regulated during normal breast development. Determining how these developmental regulators of BRCA1 expression are co-opted during breast tumourigenesis could lead to a better understanding of sporadic breast cancer aetiology and the generation of novel therapeutic strategies aimed at preventing sporadic breast tumour progression.

BRCA1: mechanisms of inactivation and implications for management of patients

The BRCA1 gene was cloned in 1994 as one of the genes that conferred genetic predisposition to early-onset breast and ovarian cancer. Since then, a genetic test for identification of high-risk individuals has been developed. Despite being implicated in many important cellular pathways, including DNA repair and regulation of transcription, the exact mechanism by which inactivation of BRCA1 might lead to malignant transformation of cells remains unknown. We examine the mechanisms that underlie inactivation of BRCA1 and assess how they affect management of patients, in terms of both primary and secondary cancer prevention strategies. Furthermore, we look at the potential usefulness of BRCA1 as a prognostic tool and as a predictive marker of response to different classes of drugs. Finally, throughout this review, we draw links between the functional consequences of BRCA1 inactivation, in terms of key cellular signalling pathways, and how they might explain specific clinical observations in individuals who carry mutations in the gene.

Predictive and prognostic markers for invasive breast cancer

Breast cancer is one of the most serious carcinomas among women worldwide, yet there are now encouraging signs that improvements in the mortality rate may be possible. The use of hormone therapy and chemotherapy has been widely accepted as treatment for breast cancer. Predictive factors can be used to predict response or lack of response to a particular therapy, and prognostic factors can be useful in making decisions about which patients should receive adjuvant therapy. Histopathology remains the universal basis of diagnosis, with the identification of new surrogate markers for potential new treatments. These are aimed at blocking tumor cell proliferation, neutralizing growth factors, stimulating apoptosis and blocking metastasis, and represent an integral part of new approaches for improving clinical management of patients with breast cancer. We review the standard predictive and prognostic factors that are routinely available today, and also describe some of the new, potential markers that are currently under investigation.

The contribution of inherited factors to the clinicopathological features and behavior of breast cancer

This review is focused on genetic factors that may influence the development and/or appearance of breast cancer metastases. Over the last decade there have been significant advances in the understanding of genetic predisposition to breast cancer. The first breast cancer predisposing gene to be identified was TP53, and this was followed over the next 5 years by two more genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, which from a population perspective are much more important than TP53. Other rarer genes have subsequently been identified, but the role of more common, less penetrant genes in breast cancer susceptibility remains unknown. Recent work has shown that breast cancers occurring in women carrying germ-line BRCA1 mutations tend to have clinicopathological features that are usually associated with a poor prognosis, such as high grade, estrogen receptor negative status and somatic TP53 mutations. On the other hand, they are usually ERBB2 negative. Whether or not such tumors are more or less likely to metastasize, and hence be associated with a poor outcome, is currently uncertain and has been the subject of much debate. Here, we outline some of the clinicopathological features of hereditary breast cancer, discuss the prognostic studies that have been performed, and introduce some possible new research directions.