Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on safety and efficacy of biliary drainage before surgery for obstructive jaundice

Prospective Comparison of Bleeding Complications Between Right and Left Approaches in Percutaneous Biliary Drainage

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to determine whether the percentage of bleeding complications differs between the right and the left approaches in percutaneous biliary drainage (PBD) in adult patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective, descriptive, nonrandomized comparative and longitudinal study. We included adult patients over 18 years of age who underwent a PBD. We excluded those with a bilateral PBD for the comparative study. Usually, but not exclusively, we performed the right approach under fluoroscopic guidance and the left one under ultrasound and fluoroscopy.

RESULTS

Of 150 cases, 63 were performed using the right approach and 61 with the left; 26 were performed with the bilateral. The right approach faced less dilated biliary ducts and more benign diseases. We experienced 20 bleeding complications (13.33%, confidence intervals of 95%=8.3-19.8), 7 in the bilateral approach, 10 in the right approach, and 3 in the left one. The difference between the right and the left approaches was statistically significant (Fisher P=0,04). No procedures were required to obtain hemostasis, and only one patient (0.66%, confidence intervals of 95%=0.009-3.66) (in the right side) required a red blood cell transfusion. We found no related mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Global bleeding complications are more likely to appear in the right approach in which less dilated biliary ducts and more benign diseases probably contributed to a higher number of needle passes, portal and hepatic vein punctures, and, therefore, to an increase in the risk of bleeding complications. The significant bleeding complication rate was low (0.66%).

The Application of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Diagnosis of Hilar Obstructive Jaundice

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in diagnosing hilar obstructive jaundice.

METHODS

Fifty-nine patients diagnosed with hilar obstructive jaundice were enrolled in our hospital form January 2017 to January 2018. All the patients received scanning by a 3.0-T nuclear magnetic resonance scanner. The values of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)slow, ADCfast, and f were obtained and analyzed by 2 experienced radiologists. The differences between patients with hilar biliary obstruction and healthy volunteers in ADCslow, ADCfast, and f values were analyzed. Moreover, the differences between benign and malignant obstructive jaundice in ADCslow, ADCfast, and f values were analyzed. According to the serum levels of total bilirubin, patients were divided into 3 groups: mild, moderate, and severe obstructive jaundice. The differences between the 3 groups in ADCslow, ADCfast, and f values were also analyzed.

RESULTS

The ADCfast values were obviously lower in patients with hilar obstructive jaundice than in healthy controls, whereas no significant difference in the values of ADCslow and f was found between both groups. The optimal cutoff value for ADCfast was 0.0341. The ADCfast values were significantly different between patients with benign and malignant hilar obstructive jaundice. The ADCfast values were negatively associated with the severity of hilar obstructive jaundice.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging was a promising method for diagnosing hilar biliary obstruction jaundice.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is the preferred procedure for biliary drainage in benign and malignant obstructions. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage is an emerging technique for when endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography fails. It is a highly versatile procedure with several options of access point, stent direction, and drainage route. Based on the current literature, the cumulative success rate is 88% to 93%, with an overall complication rate of 13% to 20%. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage seems to be an effective and valuable alternative technique after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography when performed by highly skilled endoscopists.

Endoscopic Biliary Drainage Versus Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage in Patients with Resectable Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) is a rare tumor, usually associated with obstructive jaundice and unfavorable prognosis. Obstructive jaundice can affect the liver, kidney, heart, and the immune system of the patients. Currently, controversy exists in whether preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) is of any benefit to the patients, and the best way for PBD in patients with resectable HCCA of malignant biliary obstruction remains to be determined.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clinical outcomes and effectiveness of endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) treatment with those of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) treatment in patients with malignant biliary obstruction caused by resectable HCCA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, CBM (China Biological Medicine Database), and CNKI were employed to identify the clinic trials on EBD versus PTBD for malignant biliary obstruction associated with resectable HCCA from January 2008 to October 2017. A systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out.

RESULTS

Six trials were identified and included in this study. Overall, the differences in technical success rate, R0 resection, incidence of total complication after resection, postoperative hospitalization time, resection time, and recurrence were not statistically significant between the EBD group and PTBD group (all P > .05). However, the incidence of total complications after EBD treatment is higher than that after PTBD treatment (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

For patients with obstructive jaundice associated with HCCA, current evidence indicate no superiority of PTBD over EBD regarding clinical feasibility and success rate, but data suggest a better clinical safety of PTBD compared with EBD in short-term postoperation. In long-term evaluation, the differences in clinical outcomes are not statistically significant between PTBD and EBD.

[Treatment approach for gall bladder and extrahepatic bile duct cancer]

BACKGROUND

Although the treatment and diagnostic regimens of gall bladder carcinoma and extrahepatic bile duct cancer have improved over the past years, the outcome and overall survival as prognostic values still remain poor. Early tumor stages of gall bladder carcinoma are the only exception.

OBJECTIVE

This article focuses on the latest surgical therapy approaches including neoadjuvant, adjuvant and palliative therapy regimens.

RESULTS

Neoadjuvant treatment concepts have so far been insufficiently evaluated and can therefore only be recommended within the framework of studies. In patients with primary resectable tumors there are so far no indications for improved results after neoadjuvant therapy. Radical R0 resection still remains the only curative treatment option; however, an advanced and inoperable stage is often already present at the time of diagnosis There are no uniform adjuvant treatment concepts and no standards evaluated by studies. Due to the currently available data, adjuvant radiochemotherapy and chemotherapy can also only be recommended within or as part of clinical trials. Palliative chemotherapy should only be used in advanced tumor stages and depending on the condition of the patient.

CONCLUSION

To sustainably improve treatment strategies for advanced gall bladder carcinoma and extrahepatic bile duct cancer, uniform adjuvant as well as neoadjuvant therapy regimens need to be developed after evaluation in prospective randomized trials. This is the only way to improve the still poor prognosis of these tumor entities.

Evaluation of liver function by means of serum cytokeratin 18 and hepatocyte growth factor levels in patients with obstructive jaundice

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the serum levels of cytokeratin 18 (CK18) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) in obstructive jaundice patients before and after treatment and thereby to detect the possible role of CK18 and HGF in patients with obstructive jaundice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty patients who had obstructive jaundice and 40 healthy control subjects were included in the study. Patients were treated using percutaneous, endoscopic or surgical approaches. Blood samples were obtained at the day before and 7 days after the intervention for obstructive jaundice. Serum HGF and CK18 concentrations were determined by ELISA method.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant decreases in HGF, CK18, total bilirubin and direct bilirubin serum levels, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyltransferase, and alkaline phosphatase activities and white blood cell count when compared with pre-treatment levels.

CONCLUSION

Evaluating pre- and post-treatment serum HGF and CK18 levels suggested that there was an apoptosis in obstructive jaundice patients and this apoptosis decreased after the decompression of the biliary tract. We also demonstrated that HGF levels were altered at biliary obstruction compared to healthy controls and the levels of this biomarker also decreased after decompression of biliary obstruction. We concluded that these biomarkers can be used as predictors of liver injury in biliary obstruction.

Modern work-up and extended resection in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: the AMC experience

AIM

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is a challenging disease and requires aggressive surgical treatment in order to achieve curation. The assessment and work-up of patients with presumed PHC is multidisciplinary, complex and requires extensive experience. The aim of this paper is to review current aspects of diagnosis, preoperative work-up and extended resection in patients with PHC from the perspective of our own institutional experience with this complex tumor.

METHODS

We provided a review of applied modalities in the diagnosis and work-up of PHC according to current literature. All patients with presumed PHC in our center between 2000 and 2016 were identified and described. The types of resection, surgical techniques and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Upcoming diagnostic modalities such as Spyglass and combinations of serum biomarkers and molecular markers have potential to decrease the rate of misdiagnosis of benign, inflammatory disease. Assessment of liver function with hepatobiliary scintigraphy provides better information on the future remnant liver (FRL) than volume alone. The selective use of staging laparoscopy is advisable to avoid futile laparotomies. In patients requiring extended resection, selective preoperative biliary drainage is mandatory in cholangitis and when FRL is small (< 50%). Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is used when FRL volume is less than 40% and optionally includes the left portal vein branches to segment 4. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) as alternative to PVE is not recommended in PHC. N2 positive lymph nodes preclude long-term survival. The benefit of unconditional en bloc resection of the portal vein bifurcation is uncertain. Along these lines, an aggressive surgical approach encompassing extended liver resection including segment 1, regional lymphadenectomy and conditional portal venous resection translates into favorable long-term survival.

Comparison of Metal and Plastic Stents for Preoperative Biliary Drainage in Resectable and Borderline Resectable Periampullary Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and System Review

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the plastic stents with metal stents for preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) in terms of the rate of endoscopic reintervention and PBD-related pre- and postoperative complications in patients with resectable and borderline resectable periampullary cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library database to identify relevant available articles from their inception to September 2017. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated to compare the incidence of endoscopic reintervention and stent-related complications between the plastic and metal stents groups. Also, we used RevMan 5.3 to perform the pooled analyses.

RESULTS

Four trials (three randomized controlled trials [RCT] and one prospective clinical trial) with 392 patients were included. One hundred seventy-four patients received metal stents for PBD, and 218 patients received plastic stents. The metal stents group had a significant lower rate of endoscopic reintervention (OR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.13-0.73, P = .008) and preoperative cholangitis (OR = 3.60, 95% CI = 1.62-7.98, P = .002) compared with the plastic stents group. But there was a significantly higher rate of PBD-related pancreatitis (OR = 3.60, 95% CI = 1.62-7.98, P = .002) in the metal stents group.

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis revealed that metal stents have significantly lower rate of reintervention and cholangitis than plastic stents. But plastic stents have an obvious superiority over metal stents in terms of the incidence of preoperative pancreatitis. More RCTs are required to support this conclusion and provide more detailed information about the complications and treatment. Meanwhile, a uniform standard for the PBD is required in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction.

The Effect of Preoperative Biliary and Pancreatic Drainage on Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background  Surgeons and endoscopists welcome routine preoperative biliary drainage prior to pancreaticoduodenectomy despite evidence that it increases complications. Its effect on postoperative pancreatic fistula is variably reported in literature. Simultaneous biliary and pancreatic drainage is rarely performed for very selected indications and its effects on postoperative pancreatic fistula are largely unknown. Our aim was to analyze the same while eliminating confounding factors.

Methods  Retrospective single center cohort study of patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy over the past 10 years for carcinoma obstructing the lower common bile duct. Patients who underwent biliary stenting alone, biliary and pancreatic stenting, and no stenting prior to pancreaticoduodenectomy were the three study cohort groups and their records were scrutinized for the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula.

Results  Sixty-two patients underwent biliary stenting alone, 5 patients underwent both biliary and pancreatic stenting, and 237 patients were not stented in the adenocarcinoma group without chronic pancreatitis. The pancreatic fistula rate was similar in the patients who underwent biliary stenting alone when compared with the group which was not stented. (24/62 versus 67/237, odds ratio [OR] =0.619, confidence interval (CI) =0.345–1.112, p  = 0.121). However, the patients who underwent both biliary and pancreatic stenting had a significant increase in postoperative pancreatic fistula compared with the not stented ( p  = 0.003). By univariate and multivariate analysis using Firth logistic regression, pancreatic texture (OR = 1.205, CI = 0.103–2.476, p  = 0.032) and the presence of a biliary and pancreatic stent (OR = 2.695, CI = 0.273–7.617, p  = 0.027) were the significant factors affecting pancreatic fistula.

Conclusion  Preoperative biliary drainage alone has no significant influence on postoperative pancreatic fistula except when combined with pancreatic stenting. We need more such studies from other centers to confirm that the rare event of preoperative biliary and pancreatic stenting has indeed this harmful effect on healing of postoperative pancreatic anastomosis.

Preoperative Stenting for Benign and Malignant Periampullary Diseases: Unnecessary if Not Harmful

Preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) is often performed in patients with jaundice with the presumption that it will decrease the risk of postoperative complications. PBD carries its own risk of complications and, therefore, has been controversial. Multiple randomized controlled trials and metaanalyses have shown that PBD has significantly increased overall complications compared with surgery alone. As such, the routine application of PBD should be avoided except in a subset of clinical situations. This is discussed in detail in this article.

Pathophysiological consequences of obstructive jaundice and perioperative management

BACKGROUND

Obstructive jaundice is a common problem in daily clinical practice. Understanding completely the pathophysiological changes in obstructive jaundice remains a challenge for planning current and future management.

DATA SOURCES

A PubMed was searched for relevant articles published up to August 2016. The effect of obstructive jaundice on proinflammatory cytokines, coagulation status, hemodynamics and organ functions were evaluated.

RESULTS

The effects of obstructive jaundice included biliary tree, the hepatic cell and liver function as well as systemic complications. The lack of bile in the gut, the disruption of the intestinal mucosal barrier, the increased absorption of endotoxin and the subsequent endotoxemia cause proinflammatory cytokine production (TNF-α, IL-6). Bilirubin induces systemic inflammatory response syndrome which may lead to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. The principal clinical manifestations include hemodynamic instability and acute renal failure, cardiovascular suppression, immune compromise, coagulation disorders, nutritional impairment, and wound healing defect. The proper management includes full replacement of water and electrolyte deficiency, prophylactic antibiotics, lactulose, vitamin K and fresh frozen plasma, albumin and dopamine. The preoperative biliary drainage has not been indicated in overall, but only in a few selected cases.

CONCLUSION

The perioperative management is an essential measure in improving the outcome after the appropriate surgical operation in jaundiced patients especially those with malignancy.

Influence of cholangitis after preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage on postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients with middle and lower malignant biliary strictures

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Preoperative cholangitis after preoperative drainage has been reported to increase postoperative complications, particularly pancreatic fistula. We therefore examined the effects of cholangitis after preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) on postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients with middle and lower malignant biliary strictures.

METHODS

The study group comprised 102 patients who underwent EBD among patients who underwent surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 102 patients, 33 (32%) had postoperative pancreatic fistulas, and 56 (55%) had preoperative cholangitis after preoperative drainage. Analysis of risk factors for preoperative cholangitis showed that a total bilirubin level of 2.9 mg/dL or higher (hazard ratio [HR], 2.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.223-7.130; P = 0.016) and a surgical waiting time of 29 days or longer (HR, 4.23; 95% CI, 1.681-10.637; P = 0.02) were independent risk factors for cholangitis. Patients with preoperative cholangitis had a significantly higher incidence of pancreatic fistula than did patients without preoperative cholangitis (78.8 vs 21.2%; P = 0.001). Patients with biliary cancer had a significantly higher incidence of pancreatic fistula than did those with pancreatic cancer (72.7 vs 27.2%; P = 0.005). Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative cholangitis (HR, 4.8; 95% CI, 1.785-12.992; P = 0.001) and biliary cancer (HR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.335-8.942; P = 0.006) were significant independent risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula.

CONCLUSION

Prevention of preoperative cholangitis, a risk factor for postoperative pancreatic fistula, is likely to decrease the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula.

Diagnosis and Management of Intrahepatic and Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinomas (CC) are rare tumors which usually present late and are often difficult to diagnose and treat. CCs are categorized as intrahepatic, hilar, or extrahepatic. Epidemiologic studies suggest that the incidence of intrahepatic CCs may be increasing worldwide. In this chapter, we review the risk factors, clinical presentation, and management of cholangiocarcinoma.

Simvastatin augments activation of liver regeneration through attenuating transforming growth factor-β1 induced-apoptosis in obstructive jaundice rats

Obstructive jaundice, owing to biliary obstruction, has been illustrated to trigger various biochemical, histological and immunological changes, leading to liver damage or even failure. The detailed molecular mechanism of simvastatin (Sim) involvement in liver regeneration during obstructive jaundice progression remains poorly elucidated. In the present study, an acute obstructive jaundice rat model was established by ligation and division of common bile duct, which was used to investigate the effects of Sim as a hepatoprotective treatment. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into four groups: Sham-operated, bile duct ligation (BDL) plus saline treatment [0.02 mg/kg/d, intraperitoneally (i.p.)], BDL plus low-dose Sim treatment (0.02 mg/kg, i.p.) and BDL plus high-dose Sim treatment (0.2 mg/kg, i.p.). During this experiment, the BDL+normal saline (NS) group demonstrated increased levels of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) expression. Furthermore, Sim-treated animals demonstrated significantly downregulated TGF-β1 expression and improved liver function vs. the BDL+NS group, indicating a TGF-β1 antagonizing function. Additionally, Sim increased hepatocyte DNA synthesis in BDL rats compared to both the BDL+NS and Sham group. Apoptosis was increased in BDL+NS compared to the Sham group, and Sim markedly reduced hepatocyte apoptosis in the BDL group. Moreover, analysis of TGF-β1 signaling pathways demonstrated that there was an increased hepatic TGF-β1 and Smad3 expression in the BDL group, which was attenuated in the presence of Sim. In contrast to TGF-β1, Sim induced the activity of the Smad7 (an inhibitor of TGF-β1 signaling) mRNA and Smad7 protein expression. Sim displays hepatoprotective effects in liver cells via the upregulation of Smad7 expression and impaired TGF-β signaling. Furthermore, the observations of the present study may provide evidence on the mechanism behind Sim blunting TGF-β1 signaling, which is used to ameliorate the complication of liver damage and reduce the mortality rates associated with obstructive jaundice.

Preoperative biliary drainage by plastic or self-expandable metal stents in patients with periampullary tumors: results of a randomized clinical study

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Preoperative biliary drainage in patients with periampullary tumors and jaundice has been popularized to improve the quality of life and minimize the risks associated with subsequent radical surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible superiority of self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) over plastic stents, by comparing the amount of bacteria in intraoperatively collected bile and using this variable as a proxy for the efficacy of the respective biliary drainage modalities.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this randomized clinical trial, 92 patients with obstructive jaundice were enrolled; 45 were allocated to the plastic stent group and 47 to the SEMS group. The primary outcome was the extent and magnitude of biliary bacterial growth at the time of surgical exploration. Secondary outcomes were: macroscopic grading of inflammation of the stented bile ducts, occurrence of adverse events after stenting, stent dysfunction, recognized surgical complexities, and incidence of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

 The patients were well matched regarding clinical and disease-specific characteristics. At surgery, there were no group differences in the bacterial amount and composition of the bile cultures or the perceived difficulty of surgical dissection. During the preoperative biliary drainage period, more instances of stent dysfunction requiring stent replacement were recorded in the plastic stent group (19 % vs. 0 %; P  = 0.03). Postoperative complications in patients who underwent curative surgery were more common in patients with plastic stents (72 % vs. 52 %), among which clinically significant leakage from the pancreatic anastomoses seemed to predominate (12 % vs. 3.7 %); however, none of these differences in postoperative adverse events reached statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

 This randomized clinical study was unable to demonstrate any superiority of SEMS in the efficacy of preoperative bile drainage, as assessed by the amount of bacteria in the intraoperatively collected bile. However, some data in favor of SEMS were observed among the clinical secondary outcomes variables (preoperative stent exchange rates) without increases in local inflammatory reactions.

A reduced time to surgery within a 'fast track' pathway for periampullary malignancy is associated with an increased rate of pancreatoduodenectomy

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) typically follows preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) despite PBD being potentially harmful. This study evaluated a pathway to avoid PBD within the framework of the UK's NHS.

METHOD

A prospective observational study of jaundiced patients undergoing PD for periampullary cancer. A pathway to provide early surgery without PBD was introduced at the start of the study period.

RESULTS

Over 12 months 61 and 32 patients underwent surgery with and without PBD respectively; 95% of patients in the PBD group had been stented before referral. The time from CT scan to surgery was shorter in the no PBD group (16 vs 65 days, p < 0.0001). Significantly more patients underwent PD in the no PBD group (31/32 vs 46/61, p = 0.009) and venous resection (10/31 vs 4/46, p = 0.014). The sensitivity of initial CT scan to define borderline resectable disease was worse in the PBD group (91 vs 50%, p = 0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

Early surgery to avoid PBD is possible within the NHS. By reducing the time to surgery it appears that more patients undergo potentially curative resection. It is desirable to understand why surgery without PBD is not performed routinely as are the development of strategies to support its more widespread practice.

Survey study on the practice patterns in the endoscopic management of malignant distal biliary obstruction

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM

 Endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) is a common practice. Controversy persists with regard to its role in resectable MDBO, the optimal technical method and type of stent. The aim of this study was to evaluate practice patterns in the treatment of MDBO among endoscopists with varying levels of experience and practice backgrounds.

METHODS

 Electronic survey distributed to members of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE). The main outcome measures included practice setting (academic vs. community), volume of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPs), reasons for endoscopic drainage in MDBO, and technical approach.

RESULTS

 A total of 335 subjects (54 % community-based endoscopists) completed the survey. Most academic physicians (69 %) reported performing ≥ 150 ERCPs annually compared to 18.8 % of community physicians ( P  < 0.001). In aggregate, 13.1 % of respondents performed ERCP in resectable MDBO because of surgeon preference or as the standard of care at their institution. The use of metal vs. plastic stents in MDBO varied based on practice setting. Routine sphincterotomy for MDBO was more common among community (78 %) vs academic endoscopists (61.1 %) ( P  < 0.001). Over half (58 %) of the subjects avoided covering the cystic duct take-off during stenting MDBO if there was a gallbladder in situ.

CONCLUSION

 There is significant variability in practice patterns for the treatment of MDBO. In spite of the recent ASGE guideline recommendations, some patients with resectable MDBO still undergo preoperative ERCP. Current clinical practices are not clearly supported by available data and underscore the need to increase adherence to gastrointestinal societal recommendations and an evidence-based approach to standardized patient care.

Effectiveness and risk of biliary drainage prior to pancreatoduodenectomy: review of current status

Preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) prior to pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) has gained popularity as bridge management to resolve jaundice, but its role is being challenged as it is thought to increase morbidity. To clarify the current recommendations for PBD prior to PD, we reviewed the literature, including all relevant articles published in English up until December, 2015. There is increasing evidence that PBD causes bile infection, which is related to the morbidity of infectious complications. Results of transhepatic drainage are poorer than those of endoscopic stenting, especially in an oncologic setting, although it is still unclear whether metallic stents are superior to nasobiliary drainage. PBD should be avoided whenever possible and performed only in selected cases, such as the emergency setting, an inevitable long delay (>4 weeks) before PD, and jaundice-related anorexia. Seemingly, transhepatic drainage should be reserved for refractory cases if endoscopic drainage is not possible. Further studies comparing endoscopic drainage techniques, such as metallic stents and nasobiliary drainage, are required to assess the most effective technique of PBD. Bile infection should be prevented by adequate antibiotic prophylaxis and treated even in the absence of symptoms, and bile status should be assessed systematically.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy versus percutaneous transhepatic drainage for malignant biliary obstruction after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a retrospective expertise-based study from two centers

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is widely performed as a salvage procedure in patients with unresectable malignant obstruction of the common bile duct (CBD) after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or in case of surgically altered anatomy. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EU-HGS) is a more recently introduced alternative to relieve malignant obstructive jaundice. The aim of this prospective observational study was to compare the outcome, efficacy and adverse events of EU-HGS and PTBD.

METHODS

From April 2012 to August 2015, consecutive patients with malignant CBD obstruction who underwent EU-HGS or PTBD in two tertiary-care referral centers were included. The primary endpoint was the clinical success rate. Secondary endpoints were technical success, overall survival, procedure-related adverse events, incidence of adverse events, and reintervention rate.

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients (EU-HGS, n = 31; PTBD, n = 20) were included. Median survival was 71 days (range 25-75th percentile; 30-95) for the EU-HGS group and 78 days (range 25-75th percentile; 42-108) for the PTBD group (p = 0.99). Technical success was achieved in all patients in both groups. Clinical success was achieved in 25 (86%) of 31 patients in the EU-HGS group and in 15 (83%) of 20 patients in the PTBD group (p = 0.88). There was no difference in adverse events rates between the two groups (EU-HGS: 16%; PTBD: 10%) (p = 0.69). Four deaths within 1 month (two hemorrhagic and two septic) were considered procedure related (two in the EU-HGS group and two in the PTBD group). Overall reintervention rate was significantly lower after EU-HGS (n = 2) than after PTBD (n = 21) (p = 0.0001). Length of hospital stay was shorter after EU-HGS (8 days versus 15 days; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

EU-HGS can be an effective and safe mini invasive-procedure alternative to PTBD, with similar success and adverse-event rates, but with lower rates of reintervention and length of hospitalization.

Common controversies in management of biliary strictures

Biliary strictures are caused by a heterogeneous group of benign and malignant conditions, each requiring a specific treatment approach. Management of biliary strictures often involves endoscopy either for definite treatment, as a bridge to surgery or for palliative purposes. Endoscopic treatment of various types of biliary strictures is not standardized and there are multiple areas of controversy regarding the best treatment options. These controversies are mainly due to lack of well-designed comparative studies to support a specific therapy. This paper reviews three common areas of controversy in the endoscopic management of biliary strictures. The areas discussed in this editorial include the role of biliary drainage in resectable malignant strictures and whether such drainage should be performed routinely prior to surgery, the best endoscopic palliation for unresectable hilar strictures and whether unilateral or bilateral stenting should be attempted, and the optimal endoscopic management for dominant strictures in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. The goal of this editorial is twofold. The first is to review the current literature on management of the aforementioned strictures and offer recommendations based on available evidence. The second goal is to highlight the gaps in our knowledge which in turn can encourage future research on these topics.

Value of preoperative biliary drainage on postoperative outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A case-control study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

The potential benefit of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) on postoperative outcomes remains controversial. The aim of this study was to elucidate surgical outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in patients with PBD and to show the impact of bilirubin level.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied all patients who underwent PD in our center between January 2003 and June 2015. Patients were divided into: Group A (PBD) and Group B (no PBD). The primary outcome was the rate of postoperative complication.

RESULTS

A total of 588 cases underwent PD. Group A included 314 (53.4%) patients while Group B included 274 (46.6%) patients. The overall incidence of complications and its severity were higher in Group A (p = 0.03 and p = 0.02). There was significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (p = 0.002), delayed gastric emptying (p = 0.005), biliary leakage (p = 0.04), abdominal collection (p = 0.04), and wound infection (p = 0.04) in Group A. The mean length of hospital stay was significantly longer in Group A than in Group B (12.86 ± 7.65 days vs. 11.05 ± 7.98 days, p = 0.01). No significant impact of preoperative bilirubin level on surgical outcome was detected.

CONCLUSION

PBD before PD was associated with major postoperative complications and stent-related complications.

Metal or plastic stents for preoperative biliary drainage in resectable pancreatic cancer

INTRODUCTION

In pancreatic cancer, preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) increases complications compared with surgery without PBD, demonstrated by a recent randomised controlled trial (RCT). This outcome might be related to the plastic endoprosthesis used. Metal stents may reduce the PBD-related complications risk.

METHODS

A prospective multicentre cohort study was performed including patients with obstructive jaundice due to pancreatic cancer, scheduled to undergo PBD before surgery. This cohort was added to the earlier RCT (ISRCTN31939699). The RCT protocol was adhered to, except PBD was performed with a fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS). This FCSEMS cohort was compared with the RCT's plastic stent cohort. PBD-related complications were the primary outcome. Three-group comparison of overall complications including early surgery patients was performed.

RESULTS

53 patients underwent PBD with FCSEMS compared with 102 patients treated with plastic stents. Patients' characteristics did not differ. PBD-related complication rates were 24% in the FCSEMS group vs 46% in the plastic stent group (relative risk of plastic stent use 1.9, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.2, p=0.011). Stent-related complications (occlusion and exchange) were 6% vs 31%. Surgical complications did not differ, 40% vs 47%. Overall complication rates for the FCSEMS, plastic stent and early surgery groups were 51% vs 74% vs 39%.

CONCLUSIONS

For PBD in pancreatic cancer, FCSEMS yield a better outcome compared with plastic stents. Although early surgery without PBD remains the treatment of choice, FCSEMS should be preferred over plastic stents whenever PBD is indicated.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Dutch Trial Registry (NTR3142).

Identification of bile survivin and carbohydrate antigen 199 in distinguishing cholangiocarcinoma from benign obstructive jaundice

AIM

To investigate whether bile survivin and carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199) can be helpful in distinguishing cholangiocarcinoma (malignant obstructive jaundice) from benign obstructive jaundice.

METHODS

Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the feasibility of bile survivin and CA199 in differentiating cholangiocarcinoma from benign obstructive jaundice.

RESULTS

The area under the curve for survivin and CA199 in bile and serum were 0.780 (p < 0.001), 0.6 (p = 0.084), 0.746 (p < 0.001) and 0.542 (p = 0.464), respectively. Combination of bile survivin and CA199 could improve the diagnostic capability.

CONCLUSION

Bile survivin and CA199 are significantly increased in patients with cholangiocarcinoma and may be useful biomarkers in differentiating distinguishing cholangiocarcinoma from benign obstructive jaundice.

[Recommendations for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of pre-malignant lesions and pancreatic adenocarcinoma]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Clinical management of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas is complex, and requires a multidisciplinary approach. The same applies for the premalignant lesions that are increasingly being diagnosed. The current document is an update on the diagnosis and management of premalignant lesions and adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A conference to establish the basis of the literature review and manuscript redaction was organized by the Grupo Español Multidisciplinar en Cáncer Digestivo. Experts in the field from different specialties (Gastroenterology, Surgery, Radiology, Pathology, Medical Oncology and Radiation Oncology) met to prepare the present document.

RESULTS

The current literature was reviewed and discussed, with subsequent deliberation on the evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Final recommendations were established in view of all the above.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of metal versus plastic stents for preoperative biliary drainage in resectable periampullary or pancreatic head tumors

BACKGROUND

Preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) with stenting increases complications compared with surgery without PBD. Metallic stents are considered superior to plastic stents when considering stent-related complications. Aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the rate of endoscopic re-intervention before surgery and postoperative outcomes of metal versus plastic stents in patients with resectable periampullary or pancreatic head neoplasms.

METHODS

We conducted a bibliographic research using the National Library of Medicine's PubMed database, including both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs. Quantitative synthesis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I(2) tests.

RESULTS

One RCT and four non-RCTs were selected, including 704 patients. Of these, 202 patients (29.5%) were treated with metal stents and 502 (70.5%) with plastic stents. The majority of patients (86.4%) had pancreatic cancer. The rate of endoscopic re-intervention after preoperative biliary drainage was significantly lower in the metal stent (3.4%) than in the plastic stent (14.8%) group (p < 0.0001). The rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula was significantly lower in the meta stent group as well (5.1% versus 11.8%, p = 0.04). The rate of post-operative surgical complications and of - post-operative mortality did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the present systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that metal stent are more effective than plastic stents for PBD in patients with resectable periampullary tumors, randomized controlled trials are needed in order to confirm these data with a higher level of evidence.

Efficacy of preoperative biliary drainage in malignant obstructive jaundice: a meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

In patients requiring surgical resection for malignant biliary jaundice, it is unclear if preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) would improve mortality and morbidity by restoration of biliary flow prior to operation. This is a meta-analysis to pool the evidence and assess the utility of PBD in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice. The primary outcome is comparing mortality outcomes in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice undergoing direct surgery (DS) versus PBD. The secondary outcomes include major adverse events and length of hospital stay in both the groups.

METHODS

Studies using PBD in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice were included in this study. For the data collection and extraction, articles were searched in MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials & Database of Systematic Reviews, etc. Pooled proportions were calculated using both Mantel-Haenszel method (fixed effects model) and DerSimonian-Laird method (random effects model).

RESULTS

Initial search identified 2230 reference articles, of which 204 were selected and reviewed. Twenty-six studies (N = 3532) for PBD in malignant obstructive jaundice which met the inclusion criteria were included in this analysis. The odds ratio for mortality in PBD group versus DS group was 0.96 (95 % CI = 0.71 to 1.29). Pooled number of major adverse effects was lower in the PBD group at 10.40 (95 % CI = 9.96 to 10.83) compared to 15.56 (95 % CI = 15.06 to 16.05) in the DS group. Subgroup analysis comparing internal PBD to DS group showed lower odds for major adverse events (odds ratio, 0.48 with 95 % CI = 0.32 to 0.74).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with malignant biliary jaundice requiring surgery, PBD group had significantly less major adverse effects than DS group. Length of hospital stay and mortality rate were comparable in both the groups.

Poor Results of Pancreatoduodenectomy in High-Risk Patients with Endoscopic Stent and Bile Colonization are Associated with E. coli, Diabetes and Advanced Age

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic stenting has spread as bridge management before pancreatoduedenectomy (PD) to resolve jaundice, but its role is nowadays challenged as it is reported to increase morbidity. Although bile sampling is increasingly performed, its clinical role is unclear. The objective of the study is to assess bile colonization's impact on outcome.

METHODS

Results of pancreatoduodenectomy after endoscopic stenting are analyzed in 61 high-risk patients presenting bacterial bile colonization. The impact of 11 demographic, clinical, infectious, and laboratory parameters and outcome, including pancreatic leakage, morbidity, and mortality, is analyzed.

RESULTS

All stented patients present bacterial bile colonization and PD mortality approaches 10 %. The presence of E. coli in the bile is significantly related to poor outcome, including 23.5 % mortality (p = 0.034), whereas age (≥70 years) and diabetes present borderline results (p < 0.070 and p < 0.066, respectively). E. coli (p = 0.002) and age (p = 0.017) are also related to grade C pancreatic fistula.

CONCLUSIONS

In high-risk patients undergoing PD, bile colonization inevitably occurs after endoscopic stenting and is a major risk factor of poor outcome, reaching its maximum in the case of E. coli colonization and elderly patients, where the indication to stent and/or to perform PD should be accurately evaluated. E. coli-targeted antibiotic prophylaxis should be administered.

Malignant biliary obstruction: From palliation to treatment

Malignant obstruction of the bile duct from cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, or other tumors is a common problem which may cause debilitating symptoms and increase the risk of subsequent surgery. The optimal treatment - including the decision whether to treat prior to resection - depends on the type of malignancy, as well as the stage of disease. Preoperative biliary drainage is generally discouraged due to the risk of infectious complications, though some situations may benefit. Patients who require neoadjuvant therapy will require decompression for the prolonged period until attempted surgical cure. For pancreatic cancer patients, self-expanding metallic stents are superior to plastic stents for achieving lasting decompression without stent occlusion. For cholangiocarcinoma patients, treatment with percutaneous methods or nasobiliary drainage may be superior to endoscopic stent placement, with less risk of infectious complications or failure. For patients of either malignancy who have advanced disease with palliative goals only, the choice of stent for endoscopic decompression depends on estimated survival, with plastic stents favored for survival of < 4 mo. New endoscopic techniques may actually extend stent patency and patient survival for these patients by achieving local control of the obstructing tumor. Both photodynamic therapy and radiofrequency ablation may play a role in extending survival of patients with malignant biliary obstruction.

Percutaneous biliary drainage is oncologically inferior to endoscopic drainage: a propensity score matching analysis in resectable distal cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) increases the incidence of seeding metastasis and shortens postoperative survival compared with endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD).

METHODS

A total of 376 patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy following either PTBD (n = 189) or EBD (n = 187) at 30 hospitals between 2001 and 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Seeding metastasis was defined as peritoneal/pleural dissemination and PTBD sinus tract recurrence. Univariate and multivariate analyses followed by propensity score matching analysis were performed to adjust the data for the baseline characteristics between the two groups.

RESULTS

The overall survival of the PTBD group was significantly shorter than that of the EBD group (34.2 % vs 48.8 % at 5 years; P = 0.003); multivariate analysis showed that the type of biliary drainage was an independent predictor of survival (P = 0.036) and seeding metastasis (P = 0.001). After two new cohorts with 82 patients each has been generated after 1:1 propensity score matching, the overall survival rate in the PTBD group was significantly less than that in the EBD group (34.7 % vs 52.5 % at 5 years, P = 0.017). The estimated recurrence rate of seeding metastasis was significantly higher in the PTBD group than in the EBD group (30.7 % vs 10.7 % at 5 years, P = 0.006), whereas the recurrence rates at other sites were similar between the two groups (P = 0.579).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with EBD, PTBD increases the incidence of seeding metastasis after resection for distal cholangiocarcinoma and shortens postoperative survival.

Current standards and new innovative approaches for treatment of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains a devastating disease with a 5-year survival rate not exceeding 6%. Treatment of this disease remains a major challenge. This article reviews the state-of-the-art in the management of this disease and the new innovative approaches that may help to accelerate progress in treating its victims. After careful pre-therapeutic evaluation, only 15-20% of patients diagnosed with a pancreatic cancer (PC) are eligible for upfront radical surgery. After R0 or R1 resection in such patients, evidence suggests a significantly positive impact on survival of adjuvant chemotherapy comprising 6 months of gemcitabine or fluorouracil/folinic acid. Delayed adjuvant chemoradiation is considered as an option in cases of positive margins. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) is defined as a tumour involving the mesenteric vasculature to a limited extend. Resection of these tumours is technically feasible, yet runs the high risk of a R1 resection. Neoadjuvant treatment probably offers the best chance of achieving successful R0 resection and long-term survival, but the best treatment options should be determined in prospective randomised studies. Gemcitabine has for 15 years been the only validated therapy for advanced PC. Following decades of negative phase III studies, increasing evidence now suggests that further significant improvements to overall survival can be achieved via either Folfirinox or gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel regimens. Progress in systemic therapy may improve the chances of resection in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) or locally advanced PC. This requires first enhancing knowledge of the genetic events driving carcinogenesis, which may then be translated into clinical studies.

A systematic review of safety and efficacy of hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for biliary and gallbladder cancers

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence on the safety and efficacy of hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for biliary and gallbladder cancers.

METHODS

Medline and EMBASE were systematically searched for papers of hepatopancreatoduodenectomy in patients with biliary and gallbladder cancers.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies involving 397 patients were reviewed. Major hepatectomy was undertaken in 81.3% of the 397 patients and the R0 resection rate was 71.3%. The morbidity and mortality rates were 78.9% and 10.3%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rate ranged from 3% to 50% (median = 31%). The 5-year survival rate in patients who underwent curative resection was 18-68.8% (median = 51.3%), and 0% in patients who received non-curative resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy is a challenging procedure with high morbidity and mortality rates. However, this procedure can provide a chance of long-term survival in patients in whom curative resection is feasible.

Choosing the appropriate strategy in managing malignant biliary obstruction

Most patients with pancreatic cancer develop malignant biliary obstruction. Treatment of obstruction is generally indicated to relieve symptoms and improve morbidity and mortality. First-line therapy consists of endoscopic biliary stent placement. Recent data comparing plastic stents to self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) have shown improved patency with SEMS. The decision of whether to treat obstruction and the means for doing so depend on the clinical scenario. For patients with resectable disease, preoperative biliary decompression is only indicated when surgery will be delayed or complications of jaundice exist. For patients with locally advanced disease, self-expanding metal stents are superior to plastic stents for long-term patency. For patients with advanced disease, the choice of metallic or plastic stent depends on life expectancy. When endoscopic stent placement fails, EUS guided biliary drainage, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage or surgical treatments are appropriate.

A systematic review of the safety and efficacy of hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for biliary and gallbladder cancers

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence on the safety and efficacy of hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for biliary and gallbladder cancers.

METHODS

Medline and EMBASE were systematically searched for papers describing hepatopancreatoduodenectomy in patients with biliary and gallbladder cancers.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies involving 397 patients were reviewed. A major hepatectomy was undertaken in 81.3% of the 397 patients, and the R0 resection rate was 71.3%. The morbidity and mortality rates were 78.9% and 10.3%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rate ranged from 3% to 50% (median = 31%). The 5-year survival rate in patients who underwent a curative resection was 18-68.8% (median = 51.3%), and 0% in patients who received a non-curative resection.

CONCLUSIONS

A hepatopancreatoduodenectomy is a challenging procedure with high morbidity and mortality rates. However, this procedure can provide a chance of long-term survival in patients in whom a curative resection is feasible.

Survival after surgical resection of distal cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the available evidence on the survival of distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) patients following resection with curative intent and analyze the prognostic factors.

METHODS

Relevant studies published between January 2000 and January 2015 were identified by searching PubMed and Embase and reviewed systematically. Summary relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using random-effects models.

RESULTS

A total of 39 observational studies involving 3258 patients were included in the review. R0 resection was achieved in 84% (range, 46-100%) of patients. The median 5-year overall survival rate after resection was 37% (range, 13-54%), with corresponding rate of 44% (range, 27-63%) in R0 resection. The meta-analysis for 25 studies showed that R1 resection (RR 2.36, 95% CI 1.89-2.93), lymph node metastasis (RR 2.35, 95% CI 1.89-2.93), perineural invasion (RR 1.96, 95% CI 1.64-2.34), lymphatic invasion (RR 1.84, 95% CI 1.47-2.31), vascular invasion (RR 1.99, 95% CI 1.40-2.82), pancreatic invasion (RR 2.13, 95% CI 1.39-3.27), and pathological tumor stage ≥ T3 (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.25-1.93) were associated with shorter survival.

CONCLUSION

In general, prognosis of DCC after resection is poor. R0 resection results in a substantially improved survival and represents one of the most important prognostic variables.

Current status of preoperative drainage for distal biliary obstruction

Preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) was developed to improve obstructive jaundice, which affects a number of organs and physiological mechanisms in patients waiting for surgery. However, its role in patients who will undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy for biliary obstruction remains controversial. This article aims to review the current status of the use of preoperative drainage for distal biliary obstruction. Relevant articles published from 1980 to 2015 were identified by searching MEDLINE and PubMed using the keywords “PBD”, “pancreaticoduodenectomy”, and “obstructive jaundice”. Additional papers were identified by a manual search of the references from key articles. Current studies have demonstrated that PBD should not be routinely performed because of the postoperative complications. PBD should only be considered in carefully selected patients, particularly in cases where surgery had to be delayed. PBD may be needed in patients with severe jaundice, concomitant cholangitis, or severe malnutrition. The optimal method of biliary drainage has yet to be confirmed. PBD should be performed by endoscopic routes rather than by percutaneous routes to avoid metastatic tumor seeding. Endoscopic stenting or nasobiliary drainage can be selected. Although more expensive, the use of metallic stents remains a viable option to achieve effective drainage without cholangitis and reintervention.

Endoscopic treatment of malignant biliary strictures

Endoscopic stenting is a widely accepted strategy for providing effective drainage in both extrahepatic and intrahepatic malignant strictures. In patients with extrahepatic malignancies, uncovered self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) provide excellent palliation. Hilar malignancies are probably best palliated by placement of uncovered SEMS although some disagreement exists among experts regarding the type and number of stents for optimal palliation. Preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) is commonly performed although a higher risk of complications and the lack of clear benefit raise questions about this practice. Certain groups of patients such as those with markedly elevated bilirubin levels, and in those in whom neoadjuvant therapy is planned, are good candidates for PBD. Considerable controversy exists regarding the optimal method as well as type of stent for PBD in patients with hilar malignancies. Novel endoscopic therapies, including photodynamic therapy and radiofrequency ablation, have emerged as potential adjuvant therapies in the management of malignant bile duct strictures but need further long-term evaluation to establish survival benefit. This review focuses on the current status of endoscopic therapies for malignant biliary obstructions.

Effect of Preoperative Biliary Drainage on Complications Following Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Meta-Analysis

Preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) prior to pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is still controversial; therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the impact of PBD on complications following PD. A meta-analysis was carried out for all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective studies published from inception to March 2015 that compared PBD and non-PBD (immediate surgery) for the development of postoperative complications in PD patients. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using fixed-effect analyses, or random-effects analyses if there was statistically significant heterogeneity (P < 0.05). Eight RCTs, 13 prospective studies, 20 retrospective studies, and 3 Chinese local retrospective studies with 6286 patients were included in this study. In a pooled analysis, there were no significant differences between PBD and non-PBD group in the risks of mortality, morbidity, intra-abdominal abscess, sepsis, hemorrhage, pancreatic leakage, and biliary leakage. However, subgroup analysis of RCTs yielded a trend toward reduced risk of morbidity in PBD group (OR 0.48, CI 0.24 to 0.97; P = 0.04). Compared with non-PBD, PBD was associated with significant increase in the risk of infectious complication (OR 1.52, CI 1.07 to 2.17; P = 0.02), wound infection (OR 2.09, CI 1.39 to 3.13; P = 0.0004), and delayed gastric emptying (DGE) (OR 1.37, CI 1.08 to 1.73; P = 0.009). This meta-analysis suggests that biliary drainage before PD increased postoperative infectious complication, wound infection, and DGE. In light of the results of the study, PBD probably should not be routinely carried out in PD patients.

Preoperative biliary drainage and pancreaticoduodenectomy

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the standard procedure in the surgical treatment of malignant obstructive jaundice (MOJ). However, the postoperative recovery of the patients remains unsatisfactory, due to the extensive surgical trauma and high morbidity. In this review we briefly discuss the positive effect of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) in reducing the complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy, explain the rationality and necessity of this technique, and discuss some key issues, such as the selection and indications of PBD.