[French national standard for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of upper aero-digestive tract - General principles of treatment]

OBJECTIVES

The management of upper aerodigestive tract cancers is a complex specialty. It is essential to provide an update to establish optimal care. At the initiative of the INCa and under the auspices of the SFORL, the scientific committee, led by Professor Béatrix Barry, Dr. Gilles Dolivet, and Dr. Dominique De Raucourt, decided to develop a reference framework aimed at defining, in a scientific and consensus-based manner, the general principles of treatment for upper aerodigestive tract cancers applicable to all sub-locations.

METHODOLOGY

To develop this framework, a multidisciplinary team of practitioners was formed. A systematic analysis of the literature was conducted to produce recommendations classified by grades, in accordance with the standards of the French National Authority for Health (HAS).

RESULTS

The grading of recommendations according to HAS standards has allowed the establishment of a reference for patient care based on several criteria. In this framework, patients benefit from differentiated care based on prognostic factors they present (age, comorbidities, TNM status, HPV status, etc.), conditions of implementation, and quality criteria for indicated surgery (operability, resectability, margin quality, mutilation, salvage surgery), as well as quality criteria for radiotherapy (target volume, implementation time, etc.). The role of medical and postoperative treatments was also evaluated based on specific criteria. Finally, supportive care must be organized from the beginning and throughout the patients' care journey.

CONCLUSION

All collected data have led to the development of a comprehensive framework aimed at harmonizing practices nationally, facilitating decision-making in multidisciplinary consultation meetings, promoting equality in practices, and providing a state-of-the-art and reference practices for assessing the quality of care. This new framework is intended to be updated every 5 years to best reflect the latest advances in the field.

[Last year of residency for oncologists: Overview and perspectives]

CONTEXT

The reform of the third cycle of medical studies in France has introduced of the "Junior Doctor" status during the concluding year of residency. We wish to evaluate its implementation for the first promotion of medical oncology residents during 2021-2022 in correlation with the published guidelines.

METHOD

AERIO conducted a cross-sectional study among French medical oncology residents. The survey was released via social networks and emails.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight of 47 residents responded. The typical week involved one to two half-days of consultation, one dedicated to clinical research, one multidisciplinary team meetings, with the rest of time being occupied by day care (mostly) and hospitalization. Teaching and quality management activities were infrequent (monthly or less). The Junior Doctors rated their overall satisfaction at 8/10. A large majority (92.5 %) felt equipped to handle most of the situations they encountered. Almost all residents (92.9 %) had negotiated with their placement supervisor prior to the selection procedure. In one third of the cases (35.7 %), the principle of mismatch between the number of residents and the number of training sites was not respected. Only 42.9 % received training in scientific writing and 82.2 % of the residents agreed on the relevance of the post-internship training modules developed in other specialties.

CONCLUSIONS

Junior doctors in medical oncology express overall satisfaction with this reform, which aligns with the recommendations. Nevertheless, certain concerns, such as selection procedure and inadequacy, along with areas requiring improvement, such as post-internship training and scientific writing, are clearly established.

[The French National College of Oncology Teachers (CNEC): Missions, organization, and projects]

The National College of Cancerology Teachers (CNEC) was created in September 1986. Its missions are to develop the teaching of oncology, to promote educational actions in the discipline, to participate in the development of teaching content and the definition of curricula and the control of knowledge for the training of medical students and specialists, to develop and validate educational documents relating to the above teaching, to ensure the representation of oncology teaching to of the National University Council (CNU) and administrative authorities, to ensure and coordinate relations with other university disciplines, scientific societies, national, European, and international professional groups, and to contribute to the development of research in the discipline. The current office was elected in September 2022 for three years.

Radiation therapy of the primary tumour and/or metastases of digestive metastatic cancers

Metastatic gastrointestinal cancer is not an uncommon situation, especially for pancreatic, gastric, and colorectal cancers. In this setting, few data are available on the impact of the treatment of the primary tumour. Oligometastatic disease is associated with longer survival in comparison with more advanced disease. Metastasis-directed therapy, such as stereotactic body radiotherapy, seems related to better outcomes, but the level of evidence is low. In most tumour locations, prospective data are very scarce and inclusion in ongoing trials is strongly recommended.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases in oligometastatic disease

Oligometastatic cancers designate cancers in which the number of metastases is less than five, corresponding to a particular biological entity whose prognosis is situated between a localized and metastatic disease. The liver is one of the main sites of metastases. When patients are not suitable for surgery, stereotactic body radiotherapy provides high local control rate, although these data come mainly from retrospective studies, with no phase III study results. The need for a high therapeutic dose (biologically effective dose greater than 100Gy) while respecting the constraints on the organs at risk, and the management of respiratory movements require expertise and sufficient technical prerequisites. The emergence of new techniques such as MRI-guided radiotherapy could further increase the effectiveness of stereotactic radiotherapy of liver metastases, and thus improve the prognosis of these oligometastatic cancers.

[Last year of residency for radiation oncologists in France: Overview and perspectives]

PURPOSE

The last year of the radiotherapy oncology internship in France has become a phase of empowerment, called "junior doctor", allowing interns to validate acts previously reserved only for senior doctors. This study focused on the responsibilities given to the first promotion of junior doctors in France and their feelings on this new status.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was carried out by the French associations of interns and young doctors in oncology, Aerio and SFjRO. A questionnaire was sent to the class referents of each city for transmission to the junior doctors of the year 2021-2022 from September 1st to November 30th, 2022. The questions concerned training, the modalities of this year and the feelings. Responses were analyzed anonymously using R. 4.3.1 software.

RESULTS

For radiation oncology, 33 responses were obtained from 21 cities. For most junior doctors, three to four localizations (51%) were performed with an average of five new patients per week. The contours were reviewed either systematically (51%) or only at the beginning (32%). Dosimetry was reported as never countersigned in 19%; 80% of junior doctors described having been the only radiation oncologist during multidisciplinary staff meetings. The two main areas of improvement were theoretical training (45%) and legal frameworks/contracts (42%).

CONCLUSION

These results relating to the first class of junior doctors showed an overall agreement with the recommendations of the Cnec. Feedback from interns was positive. The supervision of brachytherapy and dosimetry activities, the presence alone in multidisciplinary panel remained points of vigilance.

Practice-changing clinical trials in radiation oncology for gastrointestinal malignancies in 2021-2023

Gastrointestinal cancers are one of the most frequent cancers and a leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. We provide an overview of the most important practice-changing trials that were either published or presented at the international scientific meetings in 2021-2023. Highlights included reports on three phase III trials (CONCORDE/PRODIGE 26, ARTDECO, and a study by Xu et al.) that evaluated dose escalation in the definitive setting for locally advanced oesophageal cancers, as well as two phase III trials that evaluated the role of chemotherapy (neo-AEGIS) and targeted therapy (NRG/RTOG 1010) in the neoadjuvant setting for adenocarcinoma oesophageal cancers or gastroesophageal junction cancer. CheckMate 577 evaluated nivolumab in patients who had residual pathological disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by complete resection. The use of radiation therapy for borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer is also discussed (SMART and CONKO-007 trials). Stereotactic body radiation therapy followed by sorafenib was compared to sorafenib alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the NRG/RTOG 1112 study. New options in the management of rectal cancer are emerging such as total neoadjuvant treatment (PRODIGE 23, RAPIDO, PROSPECT), organ preservation (OPRA, OPERA), and the role of immunotherapy in patients with DNA mismatch-repair deficient/microsatellite instability. Finally, preliminary results of the ACT 4 trial that evaluated de-escalation in anal cancer are presented.

Association of Radiochemotherapy to Immunotherapy in unresectable locally advanced Oesophageal carciNoma-randomized phase 2 trial ARION UCGI 33/PRODIGE 67: the study protocol

BACKGROUND

In case of locally advanced and/or non-metastatic unresectable esophageal cancer, definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) delivering 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions in combination with platinum-based regimen remains the standard of care resulting in a 2-year disease-free survival of 25% which deserves to be associated with new systemic strategies. In recent years, several immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD1/anti-PD-L1, anti-Program-Death 1/anti-Program-Death ligand 1) have been approved for the treatment of various solid malignancies including metastatic esophageal cancer. As such, we hypothesized that the addition of an anti-PD-L1 to CRT would provide clinical benefit for patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer. To assess the efficacy of the anti-PD-L1 durvalumab in combination with CRT and then as maintenance therapy we designed the randomized phase II ARION (Association of Radiochemotherapy with Immunotherapy in unresectable Oesophageal carciNoma- UCGI 33/PRODIGE 67).

METHODS

ARION is a multicenter, open-label, randomized, comparative phase II trial. Patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio in each arm with a stratification according to tumor stage, histology and centre. Experimental arm relies on CRT with 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions in combination with FOLFOX regimen administrated during and after radiotherapy every two weeks for a total of 6 cycles and durvalumab starting with CRT for a total of 12 infusions. Standard arm is CRT alone. Use of Intensity Modulated radiotherapy is mandatory. The primary endpoint is to increase progression-free survival at 12 months from 50 to 68% (HR = 0.55) (power 90%; one-sided alpha-risk, 10%). Progression will be defined with central external review of imaging.

ANCILLARY STUDIES ARE PLANNED

PD-L1 Combined Positivity Score on carcinoma cells and stromal immune cells of diagnostic biopsy specimen will be correlated to disease free survival. The study of gut microbiota will aim to determine if baseline intestinal bacteria correlates with tumor response. Proteomic analysis on blood samples will compare long-term responder after CRT with durvalumab to non-responder to identify biomarkers.

CONCLUSION

Results of the present study will be of great importance to evaluate the impact of immunotherapy in combination with CRT and decipher immune response in this unmet need clinical situation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT: 03777813.Trial registration date: 5th December 2018.

[Ethical stakes of information in radiation oncology: Thinking the risk and building the therapeutic alliance]

Informing patients before receiving radiation therapy is a fundamental ethical imperative. As a condition of the possibility of autonomy, information allows people to make health decisions concerning themselves, which is required by French law. This information includes in particular the potential risks due to radiation therapy. It is therefore necessary to think about what risk is, and how to define and assess it, in order to finally communicate it. The practice of informing people involves many ethical issues relating to the very content of the information, the form in which it is transmitted or even the intention that leads the health professional to say (or not to say) the risk. The transmission of information also questions the way to build a relationship of trust with the patients and how to integrate their own representations about these treatments. Between the risks of paternalism or even defensive medicine, this practice is at the heart of our professional practice.

Efficacy of second-line chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with a prolonged objective response (≥ 6 months) after first-line therapy for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M-HNSCC) have a poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective in patients with tumor progression < 6 months following first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC), but data are missing for patients with progression ≥ 6 months after the last platinum dose.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis (six French centers, 2008-2019) of all consecutive R/M-HNSCC patients. treated first-line with PBC and tumor progression ≥ 6 months after the last platinum dose.

PRIMARY ENDPOINT

progression-free survival after second-line therapy (PFS2). Additional endpoints: overall survival from Day 1 of first-line (OS1) and second-line (OS2) therapy.

RESULTS

R/M-HNSCC patients (n = 144) received cisplatinum (n = 67, 47%) or carboplatinum (n = 77, 53%) first-line. Response after first-line: complete response (CR; n = 16, 11%); partial response (PR; n = 77, 53%); stable disease (n = 22, 15%). Second-line therapy: PBC (n = 95, 66%); platinum-free regimen (PFR) (n = 25, 17%); ICI (n = 24, 17%). Median [95% confidence interval] PFS (months): PBC 5.0 [3.8-6.2]; PFR 4.0 [1-7.0]; ICI 2.0 [0.4-3.6] (p = 0.16). For PBC, PFR, and ICI, respectively: OS1 30, 23, and 29 months (p = 1.02); OS2 14, 10, and 16 months (p = 0.25); PR, 26%, 16%, and 21% patients; CR, 0%, 8%, and 4% patients. For subsequent lines, ICIs were administered for PBC (n = 11, 12%) and PFR (n = 2, 8%). No predictive factor for efficacy (PFS, OS) was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Our retrospective study suggests similar efficacy regarding OS2 for second-line chemotherapy or ICI in R/M-HNSCC patients with progression ≥ 6 months after the last first-line platinum dose.

[Limits of dose constraint definition for organs at risk specific to stereotactic radiotherapy]

Stereotactic radiotherapy is a very hypofractionated radiotherapy (>7.5Gy per fraction), and therefore is more likely to induce late toxicities than conventional normofractionated irradiations. The present study examines four frequent and potentially serious late toxicities: brain radionecrosis, radiation pneumonitis, radiation myelitis, and radiation-induced pelvic toxicities. The critical review focuses on the toxicity scales, the definition of the dose constrained volume, the dosimetric parameters, and the non-dosimetric risk factors. The most commonly used toxicity scales remain: RTOG/EORTC or common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE). The definition of organ-at-risk volume requiring protection is often controversial, which limits the comparability of studies and the possibility of accurate dose constraints. Nevertheless, for the brain, whatever the indication (arteriovenous malformation, benign tumor, metastasis of solid tumors...), the association between the volume of brain receiving 12Gy (V12Gy) and the risk of cerebral radionecrosis is well established for both single and multi-fraction stereotactic irradiation. For the lung, the average dose received by both lungs and the V20 seem to correlate well with the risk of radiation-induced pneumonitis. For the spinal cord, the maximum dose is the most consensual parameter. Clinical trial protocols are useful for nonconsensual dose constraints. Non-dosimetric risk factors should be considered when validating the treatment plan.

Educative Impact of Automatic Delineation Applied to Head and Neck Cancer Patients on Radiation Oncology Residents

To evaluate the educational impact on radiation oncology residents in training when introducing an automatic segmentation software in head and neck cancer patients regarding organs at risk (OARs) and prophylactic cervical lymph node level (LNL) volumes. Two cases treated by exclusive intensity-modulated radiotherapy were delineated by an expert radiation oncologist and were considered as reference. Then, these cases were delineated by residents divided into two groups: group 1 (control group), experienced residents delineating manually, group 2 (experimental group), young residents on their first rotation trained with automatic delineation, delineating manually first (M -) and then after using the automatic system (M +). The delineation accuracy was assessed using the Overlap Volume (OV). Regarding the OARs, mean OV was 0.62 (SD = 0.05) for group 1, 0.56 (SD = 0.04) for group 2 M - , and 0.61 (SD = 0.03) for group 2 M + . Mean OV was higher in group 1 compared to group 2 M - (p = 0.01). There was no OV difference between group 1 and group 2 M + (p = 0.67). Mean OV was higher in the group 2 M + compared to group 2 M - (p < 0.003). Regarding LNL, mean OV was 0.53 (SD = 0.06) in group 1, 0.54 (SD = 0.03) in group 2 M - , and 0.58 (SD = 0.04) in group 2 M + . Mean OV was higher in group 2 M + for 11 of the 12 analysed structures compared to group 2 M - (p = 0.016). Prior use of the automatic delineation software reduced the average contouring time per case by 34 to 40%. Prior use of atlas-based automatic segmentation reduces the delineation duration, and provides reliable OARs and LNL delineations.

Quantification of Lung Tumor Motion and Optimization of Treatment

Background

Mobility of lung tumors is induced by respiration and causes inadequate dose coverage.

Objective

This study quantified lung tumor motion, velocity, and stability for small (≤5 cm) and large (>5 cm) tumors to adapt radiation therapy techniques for lung cancer patients.

Material and Methods

In this retrospective study, 70 patients with lung cancer were included that 50 and 20 patients had a small and large gross tumor volume (GTV). To quantify the tumor motion and velocity in the upper lobe (UL) and lower lobe (LL) for the central region (CR) and a peripheral region (PR), the GTV was contoured in all ten respiratory phases, using 4D-CT.

Results

The amplitude of tumor motion was greater in the LL, with motion in the superior-inferior (SI) direction compared to the UL, with an elliptical motion for small and large tumors. Tumor motion was greater in the CR, rather than in the PR, by 63% and 49% in the UL compared to 50% and 38% in the LL, for the left and right lung. The maximum tumor velocity for a small GTV was 44.1 mm/s in the LL (CR), decreased to 4 mm/s for both ULs (PR), and a large GTV ranged from 0.4 to 9.4 mm/s.

Conclusion

The tumor motion and velocity depend on the tumor localization and the greater motion was in the CR for both lobes due to heart contribution. The tumor velocity and stability can help select the best technique for motion management during radiation therapy.

Compréhension/acceptation de la radiothérapie : un dilemme éthique résolu par une éthique de la considération et de la sollicitude

PURPOSE

Ethical questions are poorly investigated specifically in radiation oncology. The objective of the study was to identify and understand the main ethical issue in radiation oncology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A quantitative analysis was based on the answers to a questionnaire of 200 professionals from 22 radiation oncology departments. The questionnaire mainly aimed to characterize the main ethical issue. A monocentric qualitative analysis was based on semi-structured interviews focused on the main identified ethical issue, carried out with eight technologists, and 20 patients undergoing radiotherapy.

RESULTS

The main ethical issue was the understanding and/or acceptance of the treatment by the patients (71 %), which frequently arises (more than once a month) (52 %), and corresponds to an ethical tension between the principles of respect for autonomy and beneficence (the good as viewed by the patient) as defined by Beauchamp and Childress. The technologists, wish the patient to be fully involved in his treatment, with the even possibility of refusing it. However, excluding paternalism and autonomic relentlessness, the technologists have the feeling of acting for the good of the patients by treating them with radiation, even if the patients are not always aware of it, because they are within a situation of vulnerability. If the hierarchy of principles is a compromise alternative, this problem is finally well resolved by the effective implementation of an ethic of consideration and solicitude, restoring the patient capabilities, i.e. the maximum development of his potentialities in his situation of vulnerability. Beyond the legal dimension, patient information is crucial and must consider the specific temporality of the patient.

CONCLUSION

The main ethical issue in radiation oncology is the understanding and/or acceptance of the treatment involving the development of an ethic of consideration and solicitude.

Efficacy and Tolerance of Carboplatin plus Cetuximab (Simplified EXTREME Regimen) in Patients with Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

AIMS

The EXTREME regimen is the standard for recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, many patients have a poor performance status and/or comorbidities, making them unfit for this regimen. We have treated them with carboplatin and cetuximab (simplified EXTREME regimen) since 2007. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and tolerance of this regimen in this frail population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all patients treated with the simplified EXTREME regimen for recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC in three academic hospitals between 2007 and 2017 was carried out. The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and toxicity.

RESULTS

One hundred and three patients were included. The median age was 63 years, 40% had performance status 2-3. The median follow-up was 30.2 months. The median overall survival and PFS were 7.2 and 3.7 months, respectively. The median overall survival was 10.1 months in patients with performance status 0-1 versus 4.6 months in patients with performance status 2-3 (P = 0.01). ORR was 39%. Acute grade 3-4 haematological and non-haematological toxicity rates were 25.2% and 27.2%, respectively. Patients with grade 1 or more skin toxicity had a higher ORR (hazard ratio = 3.44; P = 0.03), a prolonged overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.37; P < 0.0001) and PFS (hazard ratio = 0.29; P < 0.0001). During treatment, 29% of patients had pain reduction, 13.5% had weight gain and 17.2% had an improvement in performance status.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest cohort of patients treated with simplified EXTREME for HNSCC. It was well tolerated, with a high ORR. Interestingly, skin toxicity correlated with treatment efficacy.

[Immuno-radiotherapy: A review of the rationale, recent clinical developments and future prospects]

Thanks to the success of checkpoint inhibitors, immunotherapy now plays a major role in the management of a large number of solid tumors, while the number of indications continues to grow and new combinations could, in the near future, further modify treatment standards. However, the response rates of immunotherapies as monotherapy are modest and their use is increasingly considered in combination with other cancer treatments (chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy or certain targeted therapies). Combinations with radiotherapy seem particularly attractive because there is a strong experimental rationale linking part of the efficacy of ionizing radiation to an induced stimulation of both of the innate and adaptive response. Many early phases and a number of large randomized combination trials have published efficacy and safety results, while important trials are still ongoing and will provide answers in the near future. This short review recalls the experimental biological rationale for immuno-radiotherapy and highlights some of the fundamental directions being explored, then presents the clinical efficacy and safety results available to date, those expected in the near future, and finally outlines the outlook in this rapidly evolving field.

[Organ preservation for rectal cancer: What are the arguments in favor of radiotherapy?]

Standard care for rectal cancers relies on both tumor (location relative to the sphincter, T and N stage, sphincter involvement) and patients characteristics. Radical surgery (total mesorectal excision) following short-course radiotherapy (RT) or standard chemo-radiotherapy, associated with induction or consolidation chemotherapy (total neoadjuvant treatment), remains the cornerstone of locally advanced rectal cancer (T3cd, T4 and/or N+) treatment. Nevertheless, for early stages, this radical resection could be avoided in favor of conservative approaches combining RT (external, contact, brachytherapy) with or without chemotherapy (concurrent, induction or consolidative), or even be limited, for good responders, to a local excision with view of organ-preservation strategies. This conservative approach could also be offered selectively to patients with complete clinical response after the induction sequence, irrespective of initial tumor characteristics. The Watch and Wait strategy relies on clinical, endoscopic and radiological evaluations, as well as sustained surveillance. Ongoing studies aim to improve response rates, either with chemotherapy intensification, or RT boost dose escalation with brachytherapy or contact-therapy.

Neoadjuvant treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Chemoradiation or stereotactic body radiation therapy?

Despite recent advances, the prognosis of pancreatic adenocarcinomas remains poor, even for patients with resectable tumors. For these latter, new approaches based on neoadjuvant treatment have been developed. Two components are used: chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT). Indeed, pre-operative RT has many advantages in terms of efficacy and tolerance. It increases notably the chances of subsequent complete tumor resection. Several prospective trials are currently ongoing to clarify its place in the therapeutic arsenal. Another crucial question is to know which is the best RT technique: conventional normofractionated chemoradiotherapy or hypofrationated stereotactic body RT?

Traitements péri-opératoires des adénocarcinomes œsogastriques localisés

Gastric cancer is the 6th most common cancer in the world. Gastric adenocarcinomas can be divided into two groups: gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas and distal gastric adenocarcinomas, with different risk factors and potentially different therapeutic strategies. Therapeutic strategy for esogastric adenocarcinoma is multimodal. Gastric adenocarcinomas are managed with surgery and peri-operative chemotherapy. Gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas can either be treated surgically after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or in the same way than gastric adenocarcinomas. There is currently no evidence of superiority of either treatment strategy. Recently, nivolumab has been validated as an adjuvant therapy for patients with esophageal cancer who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy and had residual tumor on the surgical specimen. In the absence of preoperative treatment, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy should be discussed on a patient-by-patient basis. Currently, there is not indication for targeted therapies, nor for adapting postoperative treatment according to the response to preoperative treatment. The only validated indication for immunotherapy is as adjuvant treatment of esophageal cancer, but many studies are ongoing and may change practices in the future. The objective of this review is to synthesize the literature concerning the management of localized esogastric adenocarcinoma.

Beyond Surgical Treatment in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Literature Review

Introduction

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC) is a rare tumour as it accounts for about 10% of all salivary gland neoplasms. It occurs in all age groups with a predominance of women, but no risk factors have been identified to date. Although AdCC behaves as a slow-growing tumour, it is characterized by multiple and late recurrences. Therefore, we aim to update the knowledge of the treatment options in advanced and recurrent cases.

Materials and Methods

We performed a systematic literature review to provide a synthesis of the practical knowledge required for AdCC non-surgical management. Altogether, 99 out of the 1208 available publications were selected for analysis.

Results

AdCC is described as a basaloid tumour consisting of epithelial and myoepithelial cells. Immunohistochemistry is useful for diagnosis (PS100, Vimentin, CD117, CKit, muscle actin, p63) and for prognosis (Ki67). Identified mutations could lead to therapeutic opportunities (MYB-NFIB, Notch 1). The work-up is mainly based on neck and chest CT scan and MRI, and PET-CT with 18-FDG or PSMA can be considered. Surgical treatment remains the gold standard in resectable cases. Post-operative intensity modulated radiotherapy is the standard of care, but hadron therapy may be used in specific situations. Based on the available literature, no standard chemotherapy regimen can be recommended.

Conclusion

There is currently no consensus on the use of chemotherapy in AdCC, either concomitantly to RT in a postoperative setting or at a metastatic stage. Further, the available targeted therapies do not yet provide significant tumour response.

[Place of radiotherapy in the treatment of rectal cancer in the elderly]

Rectal cancer is a common disease of the elderly. Current treatment recommendations are established for young subjects in good general health condition, without taking into account the frailty, comorbidities and polymedications inherent in patients over 75 years old. For locally advanced lower and middle rectal cancers (T3, T4 or N+), these are based on variations of regimens including neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, surgery of the rectum with total removal of the mesorectum, and a possibility of adjuvant chemotherapy. This restrictive treatment presents a problem of compliance and is not without adverse effects. Treatment by short exclusive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy with close monitoring according to the Watch and Wait strategy can be proposed to fragile patients not eligible for surgery, even if there is a non-negligible risk of recurrence.

Radiotherapy for cancers of the oesophagus, cardia and stomach

We present the updated recommendations of the French society for radiation oncology on radiotherapy of oesophageal cancer. Oesophageal cancer still remains a malignant tumour with a poor prognosis. Surgery remains the standard treatment for localized cancers, regardless of histology. For locally advanced stages, surgery remains a standard for adenocarcinomas after neoadjuvant treatment with chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. However, it is a therapeutic option after initial chemoradiotherapy for stage III squamous cell carcinomas, given the increased morbidity and mortality with a multimodal treatment, which results in an equivalent overall survival with or without surgery. Preoperative or exclusive chemoradiotherapy should be delivered according to validated regimens with an effective total dose (50Gy), if surgery is not planned or if the tumour is deemed resectable before chemoradiotherapy. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy significantly reduces irradiation of the lungs and heart and may reduce the morbidity of this treatment, especially in combination with surgery. In case of exclusive chemoradiotherapy, dose escalation beyond 50Gy is not currently recommended. Some technical considerations still remain questionable, such as the place of prophylactic lymph node irradiation, adaptive radiotherapy, evaluation of response during and after chemoradiotherapy and the value of proton therapy.

Radiotherapy of anal canal cancer

We present the update of the recommendations of the French society for radiation oncology on external radiotherapy and brachytherapy of anal canal carcinoma. The following guidelines are presented: indications, treatment procedure, as well as dose and dose-constraints objectives, immediate postoperative management, post-treatment evaluation, and long-term follow-up.

Rectal cancer radiotherapy

We present the updated recommendations of the French society of oncological radiotherapy for rectal cancer radiotherapy. The standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer consists in chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery with total mesorectal resection and adjuvant chemotherapy according to nodal status. Although this strategy efficiently reduced local recurrences rates below 5% in expert centres, functional sequelae could not be avoided resulting in 20 to 30% morbidity rates. The early introduction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has proven beneficial in recent trials, in terms of recurrence free and metastasis free survivals. Complete pathological responses were obtained in 15% of tumours treated by chemoradiation, even reaching up to 30% of tumours when neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated to chemoradiotherapy. These good results question the relevance of systematic radical surgery in good responders. Personalized therapeutic strategies are now possible by improved imaging modalities with circumferential margin assessed by magnetic resonance imaging, by intensity modulated radiotherapy and by refining surgical techniques, and contribute to morbidity reduction. Keeping the same objectives, ongoing trials are now evaluating therapeutic de-escalation strategies, in particular rectal preservation for good responders after neoadjuvant treatment, or radiotherapy omission in selected cases (Greccar 12, Opera, Norad).

Radiation therapy of pancreatic cancers

We present the update of the recommendations of the French society of oncological radiotherapy on radiotherapy of pancreatic tumors. Currently, the use of radiation therapy for patients with pancreatic cancer is subject to discussion. In the adjuvant setting, the standard treatment is six months of chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracile, irinotecan and oxaliplatin. Chemoradiation may improve the survival of patients with incompletely resected tumours (R1). This remains to be confirmed by a prospective trial. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is a promising treatment especially for patients with borderline resectable tumours. For patients with locally advanced tumours, there is no standard. An induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation for non progressive patients reduces the rate of local relapse. Whereas in the first trials of chemoradiation large fields were used, the treated volumes have been reduced to improve tolerance. Tumour movements induced by breathing should be taken in account. Intensity modulated radiation therapy allows a reduction of doses to the organs at risk. Whereas widely used, this technique has poor evidence-based recommendation. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is also being studied, as a neoadjuvant or exclusive treatment.

Radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer

Nasopharyngeal cancers are a rarity in France. Radiotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment, frequently combined with chemotherapy. The technical modality of radiotherapy is complex in this disease, which is located in the vicinity of numerous organs at risk. In this article, we will present the updated guidelines of the French society for radiation oncology (Société française de radiothérapie oncologique, SFRO) on the indications, and technical details of radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal cancers.

Combination of radiation therapy-immunotherapy for head and neck cancers: Promises kept?

Chemoradiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin has been the standard treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) for over 20 years. Recently, immunotherapy, a new therapeutic class, has emerged for patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC and has significantly extended their survival. Will it bring the same benefit to patients with localized tumors? There is a strong rationale for combining radiation therapy and checkpoint inhibitors for HNSCC. Indeed, radiation therapy can have both immunostimulatory and immunomodulatory effects. This is what explains the famous abscopal effect. The aim of this review is to present the data available on the combination of radiation therapy and immunotherapy for HNSCC.

A priori quality assurance using a benchmark case of the randomized phase 2 GORTEC 2014-14 in oligometastatic head and neck cancer patients

PURPOSE

A Benchmark Case (BC) was performed as part of the quality assurance process of the randomized phase 2 GORTEC 2014-14 OMET study, testing the possibility of multisite stereotactic radiation therapy (SBRT) alone in oligometastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) as an alternative to systemic treatment and SBRT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Compliance of the investigating centers with the prescription, delineation, planning and evaluation recommendations available in the research protocol was assessed. In addition, classical dosimetric analysis was supplemented by quantitative geometric analysis using conformation indices.

RESULTS

Twenty centers participated in the BC analysis. Among them, four major deviations (MaD) were reported in two centers. Two (10%) centers in MaD had omitted the satellite tumor nodule and secondarily validated after revision. Their respective DICE indexes were 0.37 and 0 and use of extracranial SBRT devices suboptimal There were significant residual heterogeneities between participating centers, including those with a similar SBRT equipment, with impact of plan quality using standard indicators and geometric indices.

CONCLUSION

A priori QA using a BC conditioning the participation of the clinical investigation centers showed deviations from good SBRT practice and led to the exclusion of one out of the twenty participating centers. The majority of centers have demonstrated rigorous compliance with the research protocol. The use of quality indexes adds a complementary approach to improve assessment of plan quality.

The role of radiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer

At diagnosis, about 15% of patients with pancreatic cancer present with a resectable tumour, 50% have a metastatic tumour, and 35% a locally advanced tumour, non-metastatic but unresectable due to vascular invasion, or borderline resectable. Despite the technical progress made in the field of radiation therapy and the improvement of the efficacy of chemotherapy, the prognosis of these patients remains very poor. Recently, the role of radiation therapy in the management of pancreatic cancer has been much debated. This review aims to evaluate the role of radiation therapy for patients with locally advanced tumours.

Unrecognized digestive toxicities of radiation therapy

The aim of this article is to review unrecognized toxicities resulting from radiation therapy of digestive neoplasms. Due to their precocious occurrence, acute toxicities are well-known by radiation oncologist, and their treatment well-established. Thus, acute toxicities will not be described in this review. We will focus on incidence, diagnosis, and management of late and uncommon toxicities occurring in the digestive tract and digestive organs. Prevention, by respecting healthy tissues constraints, is the main tool to reduce incidence of those rare complications. Nonetheless, once installed, late toxicities remain a major burden in terms of quality of life and can even be life threatening. Hence, information and education about their diagnosis and management is important.

[Ethical stakes in palliative care in radiation oncology]

In 2021, the Ethics Commission of the SFRO has chosen the issue of the practice of palliative care in radiotherapy oncology. Radiation oncology plays a central role in the care of patients with cancer in palliative phase. But behind the broad name of palliative radiotherapy, we actually find a large variety of situations involving diverse ethical issues. Radiation oncologists have the delicate task to take into account multiple factors throughout a complex decision-making process. While the question of the therapeutic indication and the technical choice allowing it to be implemented remains central, reflection cannot be limited to these decision-making and technical aspects alone. It is also a question of being able to create the conditions for a singularity focused care and to build an authentic care relationship, beyond technicity. It is through this daily ethical work, in close collaboration with patients, and under essential conditions of multidisciplinarity and multiprofessionalism, that our fundamental role as caregiver can be deployed.

Investigation of Relation of Radiation Therapy Quality With Toxicity and Survival in LAP07 Phase 3 Trial for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma

PURPOSE

The LAP07 multicenter randomized study assessed whether chemoradiation therapy increases overall survival versus continuation chemotherapy in patients whose locally advanced pancreatic cancer was controlled after 4 months of induction chemotherapy. This analysis investigated whether failure to adhere to radiation therapy (RT) guidelines influenced survival and toxicity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This is a planned analysis of secondary objectives in the framework of a randomized international phase 3 trial. The protocol included detailed written RT guidelines. All participating institutions undertook an initial benchmark case to check adherence to protocol guidelines. Centers with major deviation were not allowed to include patients until they achieved a significant improvement and rigorously followed the guidelines. On-trial RT quality assurance consisted of a central review of treatment plan with dose-volume histograms for each patient. Adherence to guidelines was graded as per protocol (PP), minor deviation (MiD), or major deviation (MaD).

RESULTS

Fifty-seven benchmark cases were evaluated, 26% were classified as PP, 60% were MiD, and 14% were MaD. Among the 442 included patients, 133 patients were randomized in the chemoradiation therapy arm, and 117 patients were assessable for RT quality analysis. RT quality was graded as PP in 38.5% of patients, MiD in 43.6% of patients, and MaD in 17.9% of patients. The most frequent protocol violations were dose distribution heterogeneities. Median overall survival was 17 months with PP and MiD versus 13.4 months with MaD (hazard ratio [HR], 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-2.71; P = .055). There was no difference in terms of progression-free survival (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.66-1.8; P = .72). Patients with MaD had more nausea than patients treated PP or with MiD (P = .0045).

CONCLUSIONS

MaD was associated with a trend for worst survival. There was no difference in terms of progression-free survival. Because of the low rate of major deviations, their effects on the LAP07 trial results may be negligeable.

Predictive Value of Neutrophils Count for Local Tumor Control After Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Baseline neutrophil count may predict overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The international multicenter randomized LAP07 phase 3 trial has enrolled 442 patients with LAPC. We analyzed the prognostic value of both baseline neutrophilia (neutrophil count >7 g/L) and elevated or increasing neutrophil count as (1) neutrophilia or (2) increased absolute neutrophil count after induction chemotherapy versus baseline for OS, progression-free survival, and local control (LC). A Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess elevated or increasing neutrophil count status by randomly assigned treatment interactions for each endpoint.

RESULTS

Among the 442 patients, 47 patients (11%) with baseline neutrophilia had worse OS (median 8.9 vs 13.3 months; P = .01). After induction chemotherapy, among the 235 patients whose blood counts were available, 90 patients (38%) had elevated or increasing neutrophil count associated with poorer OS in univariate (median 14.4 vs 17.9 months; P = .001) and multivariate analysis (P = .004). Elevated or increasing neutrophil count was also predictive of a decreased benefit of chemoradiation therapy on LC. In 126 patients without elevated or increasing neutrophil count, 1-year LC was 80% in the chemoradiation arm versus 54% in the chemotherapy arm (P < .001; interaction test P = .015).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, baseline neutrophilia and increased absolute neutrophil count were associated with worse OS in this large series of patients with LAPC. In addition, the counts were an independent prognosis factor and a strong predictive LC biomarker for chemoradiation therapy benefit. An assessment of neutrophils counts can help to improve the selection of patients who might benefit from chemoradiation therapy after induction chemotherapy.

Histosurgical mapping of endoscopic endonasal surgery of sinonasal tumours to improve radiotherapy guidance

PURPOSE

Endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) is becoming a standard for most malignant sinonasal tumours. Margin analysis after piecemeal resection is complex and optimally relies on accurate histosurgical mapping. Postoperative radiotherapy may be adapted based on margin assessment mapping to reduce the dose to some sinonasal subvolumes. We assessed the use of histosurgical mapping by radiation oncologists (RO).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A French practice survey was performed across 29 ENT expert RO (2 did not answer) regarding integration of information on EES, as well as quality of operative and pathology reportsto refine radiotherapy planning after EES. This was assessed through an electronic questionnaire.

RESULTS

EES was ubiquitously performed in France. Operative and pathology reports yielded accurate description of EES samples according to 66.7% of interviewed RO. Accuracy of margin assessment was however insufficient according to more than 40.0% of RO. Additional margins/biopsies of the operative bed were available in 55.2% (16/29) of the centres. In the absence of additional margins, quality of resection after EES was considered as microscopically incomplete in 48.3% or dubious in 48.3% of RO. As performed, histosurgical mapping allowed radiotherapy dose and volumes adaptation according to 26.3% of RO only.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardized histosurgical mapping with margin and additional margin analysis could be more systematic. Advantages of accurate EES reporting could be dose painting radiotherapy to further decrease morbidity in sinonasal tumours.

Locoregional relapses in the ACCORD 12/0405-PRODIGE 02 study: Dosimetric study and risk factors

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to correlate locoregional relapse with radiation therapy volumes in patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation in the ACCORD 12/0405-PRODIGE 02 trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified patients who had a locoregional relapse included in ACCORD 12's database. We studied their clinical, radiological, and dosimetric data to analyze the dose received by the area of relapse.

RESULTS

39 patients (6.5%) presented 54 locoregional relapses. Most of the relapses were in-field (n = 21, 39%) or marginal (n = 13, 24%) with only six out-of-field (11%), 14 could not be evaluated. Most of them happened in the anastomosis, the perirectal space, and the usual lymphatic drainage areas (presacral and posterior lateral lymph nodes). Only patients treated for a lower rectum adenocarcinoma had a relapse outside of the treated volume. 2 patients with T4 tumors extending into anterior pelvic organs had relapses in anterior lateral and external iliac lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Lowering the upper limit of the treatment field for low rectal tumors increased the risk of out of the field recurrence. For very low tumors, including the inguinal lymph nodes in the treated volume should be considered. Recording locoregional involvement, treated volumes, and relapse areas in future prospective trials would be of paramount interest to refine delineation guidelines.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination for patients with solid cancer: Review and point of view of a French oncology intergroup (GCO, TNCD, UNICANCER)

The impacts of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic on cancer care are multiple, entailing a high risk of death from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with cancer treated by chemotherapy. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines represent an opportunity to decrease the rate of severe COVID-19 cases in patients with cancer and also to restore normal cancer care. Patients with cancer to be targeted for vaccination are difficult to define owing to the limited contribution of these patients in the phase III trials testing the different vaccines. It seems appropriate to vaccinate not only patients with cancer with ongoing treatment or with a treatment having been completed less than 3 years ago but also household and close contacts. High-risk patients with cancer who are candidates for priority access to vaccination are those treated by chemotherapy. The very high-priority population includes patients with curative treatment and palliative first- or second-line chemotherapy, as well as patients requiring surgery or radiotherapy involving a large volume of lung, lymph node and/or haematopoietic tissue. When possible, vaccination should be carried out before cancer treatment begins. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination can be performed during chemotherapy while avoiding periods of neutropenia and lymphopenia. For organisational reasons, vaccination should be performed in cancer care centres with messenger RNA vaccines (or non-replicating adenoviral vaccines in non-immunocompromised patients). Considering the current state of knowledge, the benefit-risk ratio strongly favours SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of all patients with cancer. To obtain more data concerning the safety and effectiveness of vaccines, it is necessary to implement cohorts of vaccinated patients with cancer.

Cetuximab combined with paclitaxel or paclitaxel alone for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma progressing after EXTREME

BACKGROUND

Prognosis of recurrent or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains poor. The addition of cetuximab, to platinum and fluorouracil chemotherapy (EXTREME regimen) has been shown to improve patients' outcomes in first-line settings.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study, including HNSCC that progressed after a first line of platinum-based chemotherapy and cetuximab, treated either by paclitaxel + cetuximab (PC) or paclitaxel alone (P), between January 2010 and April 2018. The end points were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rates (ORR). Patients were matched according to their propensity scores, estimated with a logistic regression model. The secondary objectives were to study the safety profile and to look for prognostic and predictive factors of effectiveness.

RESULTS

Of the 340 identified patients, 262 were included in the analysis, 165 received PC, and 97 received P. In unmatched population, ORR was 16.4% with PC and 6.2% for P. Median PFS was 2.9 months [95% Confidence Interval 2.7-3.0] for PC versus 2.5 months [2.2-2.7] for P, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.770 [0.596-0.996]. Median OS was 5.5 months [4.4-6.9] for PC versus 4.2 months [3.4-4.8] for P, HR = 0.774 [0.590-1.015]. In multivariate analysis, PC was associated with better PFS and OS. These results were consistent in matched-paired population. Previous cetuximab maintenance for more than 3 months was predictive of better OS with PC.

CONCLUSION

Although the continuation of cetuximab in combination with paclitaxel after EXTREME provides moderate benefit, it could be an interesting option for selected patients.

Recommendations for postoperative radiotherapy in head & neck squamous cell carcinoma in the presence of flaps: A GORTEC internationally-reviewed HNCIG-endorsed consensus

INTRODUCTION

Head and neck reconstructive surgery using a flap is increasingly common. Best practices and outcomes for postoperative radiotherapy (poRT) with flaps have not been specified. We aimed to provide consensus recommendations to assist clinical decision-making highlighting areas of uncertainty in the presence of flaps.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Radiation, medical, and surgical oncologists were assembled from GORTEC and internationally with the Head and Neck Cancer International Group (HNCIG). The consensus-building approach covered 59 topics across four domains: (1) identification of postoperative tissue changes on imaging for flap delineation, (2) understanding of tumor relapse risks and target volume definitions, (3) functional radiation-induced deterioration, (4) feasibility of flap avoidance.

RESULTS

Across the 4 domains, international consensus (median score ≥ 7/9) was achieved only for functional deterioration (73.3%); other consensus rates were 55.6% for poRT avoidance of flap structures, 41.2% for flap definition and 11.1% for tumor spread patterns. Radiation-induced flap fibrosis or atrophy and their functional impact was well recognized while flap necrosis was not, suggesting dose-volume adaptation for the former. Flap avoidance was recommended to minimize bone flap osteoradionecrosis but not soft-tissue toxicity. The need for identification (CT planning, fiducials, accurate operative report) and targeting of the junction area at risk between native tissues and flap was well recognized. Experts variably considered flaps as prone to tumor dissemination or not. Discrepancies in rating of 11 items among international reviewing participants are shown.

CONCLUSION

International GORTEC and HNCIG-endorsed recommendations were generated for the management of flaps in head and neck radiotherapy. Considerable knowledge gaps hinder further consensus, in particular with respect to tumor spread patterns.

[Vaccination against COVID-19 in patients with solid cancer: Review and point of view from a French oncology inter-group (CGO, TNCD, UNICANCER)]

The COVID-19 pandemic has a major impact at all stages of cancer treatment. Risk of death from COVID-19 in patients treated for a cancer is high. COVID-19 vaccines represent a major issue to decrease the rate of severe forms of the COVID-19 cases and to maintain a normal cancer care. It is difficult to define the target population for vaccination due to the limited data available and the lack of vaccine doses available. It appears theoretically important to vaccinate patients with active cancer treatment or treated since less than three years, as well as their family circle. In France, patients actually defined at "high risk" for priority access to vaccination are those with a cancer treated by chemotherapy. A panel of experts recently defined another "very high-priority" population, which includes patients with curative or palliative first or second-line chemotherapy, as well as patients requiring surgery or radiotherapy involving a large lung volume, lymph nodes and/or of hematopoietic tissue. Ideally, it is best to vaccinate before cancer treatment. Despite the lack of published data, COVID-19 vaccines can also be performed during chemotherapy by avoiding periods of bone marrow aplasia and if possible, to do it in cancer care centers. It is necessary to implement cohorts with immunological and clinical monitoring of vaccinated cancer patients. To conclude, considering the current state of knowledge, the benefit-risk ratio strongly favours COVID-19 vaccination of all cancer patients.

Management of digestive cancers during the COVID-19 second wave: A French intergroup point of view (SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, ACHBT, SFR)

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 pandemic has major impact of healthcare systems, including cancer care pathways. The aim of this work is to discuss in a multidisciplinary approach the therapeutic and/or strategies adaptations for patients treated for a digestive cancer during the European second wave of COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

A collaborative work was performed by several French societies to answer how to preserve digestive cancer care with no loss of chance during the second wave of COVID-19. In this context, all recommendations are graded as expert's agreement according to level evidence found in literature until October 2020 and the experience of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESULTS

As far as possible, no therapeutic modification should be carried out. If necessary, therapeutic adjustments may be considered if they do not constitute a loss of chance for patients. Considering the level of evidence all therapeutic modifications need to be discussed in multidisciplinary tumor board meeting and with patient consent. By contrast to first wave cancer prevention, cancer screening, supportive care and clinical trials should be continued.

CONCLUSION

Recommendations proposed could limit cancer excess mortality due to the COVID-19 pandemic but should be adapted according to the situation in each hospital.

Factors associated with under-reporting of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in cause-of-death records: A comparative study of two national databases in France from 2008 to 2012

OBJECTIVE

To date, no study has evaluated the detection rate of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) in cause-of-death records in Europe. Our objectives were to compare the number of deaths attributable to HNSCC from two national databases in France and to identify factors associated with under-reporting of HNSCC in cause-of-death records.

METHODS

The national hospital discharge database and the national underlying cause-of-death records were compared for all HNSCC-attributable deaths in adult patients from 2008 to 2012 in France. Factors associated with under-reporting of HNSCC in cause-of-death records were assessed using multivariate Poisson regression.

RESULTS

A total of 41,503 in-hospital deaths were attributable to HNSCC as compared to 25,647 deaths reported in national UCoD records (a detection rate of 62%). Demographics at death were similar in both databases with respect to gender (83% men), age (54% premature deaths at 25-64 years), and geographic distribution. In multivariate Poisson regression, under-reporting of HNSCC in cause-of-death records significantly increased in 2012 compared to 2010 (+7%) and was independently associated with a primary HNSCC site other than the larynx, a former primary or second synchronous cancer other than HNSCC, distant metastasis, palliative care, and death in hospitals other than comprehensive cancer care centers. The main study results were robust in a sensitivity analysis which also took into account deaths outside hospital (overall, 51,129 HNSCC-attributable deaths; a detection rate of 50%). For the year 2012, the age-standardized mortality rate for HNSCC derived from underlying cause-of-death records was less than half that derived from hospital discharge summaries (14.7 compared to 34.1 per 100,000 for men and 2.7 compared to 6.2 per 100,000 for women).

CONCLUSION

HNSCC is largely under-reported in cause-of-death records. This study documents the value of national hospital discharge databases as a complement to death certificates for ascertaining cancer deaths.