Concordant improvements in coronary flow reserve and ST-segment resolution during percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: a benefit of postconditioning

Effects of Pre- and Postconditioning on Arrhythmogenesis in the In Vivo Rat Model

The antiarrhythmic potential of postconditioning in in vivo models remains poorly defined. We compared the effects of pre- and postconditioning on ventricular arrhythmogenesis against controls with and without reperfusion. Wistar rats (n = 40, 269 ± 3 g) subjected to ischemia (30 minutes)–reperfusion (24 hours) were assigned to the following groups: (1) preconditioning (2 cycles), (2) postconditioning (6 cycles), or (3) no intervention and were compared with (4) nonreperfused infarcts and (5) sham-operated animals. Infarct size was measured, and arrhythmogenesis was evaluated with continuous telemetric electrocardiographic recording, heart rate variability indices, and monophasic action potentials (MAPs). During a 24-hour observation period, no differences in mortality were observed. Reperfusion decreased infarct size and ameliorated sympathetic activation during the late reperfusion phase. Preconditioning decreased infarct size by a further 35% ( P = .0017), but only a marginal decrease (by 18%, P = .075) was noted after postconditioning. Preconditioning decreased arrhythmias during ischemia and early reperfusion, whereas postconditioning almost abolished them during the entire reperfusion period. No differences were noted in MAPs or in the magnitude of sympathetic activation between the 2 interventions. Compared to postconditioning, preconditioning affords more powerful cytoprotection, but both interventions exert antiarrhythmic actions. In the latter, these are mainly evident during the ischemic phase and continue during early reperfusion. Postconditioning markedly decreases reperfusion arrhythmias during a prolonged observation period. The mechanisms underlying the antiarrhythmic effects of pre- and postconditioning are likely different but remain elusive.

Cardioprotection: chances and challenges of its translation to the clinic

Myocardial infarct size is a major determinant of prognosis. Ischaemic preconditioning with brief coronary occlusion and reperfusion before a sustained period of coronary occlusion with reperfusion delays infarct development. Ischaemic postconditioning uses repetitive brief coronary occlusion during early reperfusion of myocardial infarction and reduces infarct size. Remote ischaemic preconditioning uses brief ischaemia and reperfusion of a distant organ to protect the myocardium. These conditioning protocols recruit a complex signal cascade of sarcolemmal receptor activation, intracellular enzyme activation, and ultimately mitochondrial stabilisation and inhibition of death signalling. Conditioning protocols have been successfully used in patients undergoing elective coronary revascularisation and reperfusion after acute myocardial infarction. Pharmacological recruitment of cardioprotective signalling has also been used to reduce infarct size, but so far without prognostic benefit. Outcomes of cardioprotection are affected by age, sex, comorbidities, and drugs, but also by technical issues related to determination of infarct size and revascularisation procedure.

Hydrogen sulfide-mediated myocardial pre- and post-conditioning

Coronary artery disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the Western world. Acute myocardial infarction, resulting from coronary artery atherosclerosis, is a serious and often fatal consequence of coronary artery disease, resulting in cell death in the myocardium. Pre- and post-conditioning of the myocardium are two treatment strategies that reduce the amount of cell death significantly. Hydrogen sulfide has recently been identified as a potent cardioprotective signaling molecule, which is a highly effective pre- and post-conditioning agent. The cardioprotective signaling pathways involved in hydrogen sulfide-based pre- and post-conditioning will be explored in this article.

An update on cardioprotection: a review of the latest adjunctive therapies to limit myocardial infarction size in clinical trials

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with subsequent left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the Western world. Rapid advances in the treatment of AMI, mainly through timely reperfusion, have substantially improved outcomes in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and particularly ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. A vast amount of research, both translational and clinical, has been published on various pharmacological and interventional techniques to prevent myocardial cell death during the time of ischemia and subsequent reperfusion. Several methods of cardioprotection have shown the ability to limit myocardial infarction size in clinical trials. Examples of interventional techniques that have proven beneficial are ischemic post-conditioning and remote ischemic per-conditioning, both of which can reduce infarction size. Lowering core body temperature with cold saline infusion and cooling catheters have also been shown to be effective in certain circumstances. The most promising pharmaceutical cardioprotective agents at this time appear to be adenosine, atrial natriuretic peptide, and cyclosporine, with other potentially effective medications in the pipeline. Additional pre-clinical and clinical research is needed to further investigate newer cardioprotective strategies to continue the current trend of improving outcomes following AMI.

Endogenous cardioprotection by ischaemic postconditioning and remote conditioning

Persistent myocardial ischaemia causes cell death if not rescued by early reperfusion. Millions of years in nature's laboratory have evolved protective responses that 'condition' the heart (and other tissues) to adapt to stressors, and these responses are applicable to the relatively new societal stress of myocardial ischaemia and reperfusion injury. Conditioning can be applied before (preconditioning), during (perconditioning), or after (postconditioning) the ischaemic stressor by imposing short periods of non-lethal ischaemia separated by brief periods of reperfusion. This conditioning protects multiple cell types and induces or rebalances a number of physiological and molecular pathways that ultimately attenuate necrosis and apoptosis. The seemingly disparate pathways may converge directly or indirectly on the mitochondria as a final effector, but other pathways not affecting mitochondria broaden the mechanisms of cardioprotection. The potential downsides of imposing even brief ischaemia directly on the heart somewhat tempered the enthusiasm for applying conditioning stimuli to the heart, but this hurdle was surmounted by applying ischaemia to remote organs and tissues in pre-, per-, and postconditioning. Although the clinical translation of remote per- and postconditioning has been rapid compared with classical preconditioning, there are numerous basic questions that require further investigation, and wider adoption awaits large-scale randomized clinical trials. Pharmacological mimetics may provide another important therapeutic approach by which to treat evolving myocardial infarction.

Ischaemia-reperfusion injury impairs tissue plasminogen activator release in man

AIMS

Ischaemia-reperfusion (IR) injury causes endothelium-dependent vasomotor dysfunction that can be prevented by ischaemic preconditioning. The effects of IR injury and preconditioning on endothelium-dependent tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) release, an important mediator of endogenous fibrinolysis, remain unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Ischaemia-reperfusion injury (limb occlusion at 200 mmHg for 20 min) was induced in 22 healthy subjects. In 12 subjects, IR injury was preceded by local or remote ischaemic preconditioning (three 5 min episodes of ipsilateral or contralateral limb occlusion, respectively) or sham in a randomized, cross-over trial. Forearm blood flow (FBF) and endothelial t-PA release were assessed using venous occlusion plethysmography and venous blood sampling during intra-arterial infusion of acetylcholine (5-20 µg/min) or substance P (2-8 pmol/min). Acetylcholine and substance P caused dose-dependent increases in FBF (P<0.05 for all). Substance P caused a dose-dependent increase in t-PA release (P<0.05 for all). Acetylcholine and substanceP-mediated vasodilatation and substanceP-mediated t-PA release were impaired following IR injury (P<0.05 for all). Neither local nor remote ischaemic preconditioning protected against the impairment of substance P-mediated vasodilatation or t-PA release.

CONCLUSION

Ischaemia-reperfusion injury induced substanceP-mediated, endothelium-dependent vasomotor and fibrinolytic dysfunction in man that could not be prevented by ischaemic preconditioning.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

Reference number: NCT00789243, URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00789243?term=NCT00789243&rank=1.

Ischaemic postconditioning revisited: lack of effects on infarct size following primary percutaneous coronary intervention

AIMS

To assess the short- and long-term effects of postconditioning (p-cond) on infarct size, extent of myocardial salvage, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in a series of patients presenting with evolving ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Previous studies have shown that p-cond during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) confers protection against ischaemia-reperfusion injury and thus might reduce myocardial infarct size.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients undergoing PCI for a first STEMI with TIMI grade flow 0-1 and no collaterals were randomized to p-cond (n= 39) or controls (n= 40). Postconditioning was performed by applying four consecutive cycles of 1 min balloon inflation, each followed by 1 min deflation. Infarct size, myocardial salvage, and LVEF were assessed by cardiac-MRI 1 week and 6 months after MI. Postconditioning was associated with lower myocardial salvage (4.1 ± 7.2 vs. 9.1 ± 5.8% in controls; P= 0.004) and lower myocardial salvage index (18.9 ± 27.4 vs. 30.9 ± 20.5% in controls; P= 0.038). No significant differences in infarct size and LVEF were found between the groups at 1 week and 6 months after MI.

CONCLUSION

This randomized study suggests that p-cond during primary PCI does not reduce infarct size or improve myocardial function recovery at both short- and long-term follow-up and might have a potential harmful effect.

Postconditioning against ischaemia-reperfusion injury: ready for wide application in patients?

Ischaemic postconditioning (IPOC) is an intervention in which brief, intermittent periods of reocclusion at the onset of reperfusion (i.e. stuttering reperfusion) protect myocardium from lethal reperfusion injury. The mechanism underlying the cardioprotective effects of IPOC is incompletely understood. However, it is perceived that IPOC begins with specific cell-surface receptors responsible for activating a number of signalling pathways, many of which appear to converge at the mitochondrial level. IPOC has been demonstrated both in animal models and in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in small proof-of-concept trials. This intervention offers the possibility of further limiting infarct size in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Here, we provide a brief overview of the concept of IPOC and the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:389-93.).

The therapeutic potential of ischemic conditioning: an update

Novel approaches are required to improve clinical outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Ischemic conditioning--the practice of applying brief episodes of nonlethal ischemia and reperfusion to confer protection against a sustained episode of lethal ischemia and reperfusion injury--is one potential therapeutic strategy. Importantly, the protective stimulus can be applied before (ischemic preconditioning) or after (ischemic perconditioning) onset of the sustained episode of lethal ischemia, or even at the onset of myocardial reperfusion (ischemic postconditioning). Furthermore, the protective stimulus can be applied noninvasively by placing a blood-pressure cuff on an upper or lower limb to induce brief episodes of nonlethal ischemia and reperfusion (remote ischemic conditioning), a finding that has greatly facilitated the translation of ischemic conditioning to various clinical settings. In addition to mechanical approaches, elucidation of the signal-transduction pathways underlying ischemic conditioning has identified several novel targets for pharmacological conditioning. This Review highlights findings from proof-of-concept clinical studies conducted in the past 5-6 years, in which the therapeutic potential of ischemic and pharmacological conditioning has been realized. Large, randomized, controlled trials are now required to determine whether pharmacological and ischemic conditioning improve clinical end points and outcomes in patients with CHD.

Postconditioning in acute myocardial infarction patients

Reperfusion therapy is the indispensable treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and must be applied as soon as possible to attenuate the ischemic insult. Evidence indicates that reperfusion is responsible for additional myocardial damage likely involving opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore. Ischemic postconditioning is a new way to dramatically reduce the lethal reperfusion injury. Several clinical studies using angioplasty postconditioning now support its protective effects in patients with an AMI. An interesting alternative is pharmacological postconditioning, which could be applied to a much larger number of patients. The mitochondrial permeability transition pore inhibitor cyclosporine A has been shown to generate a comparable protection in AMI patients. Future large-scale trials are needed to determine whether postconditioning may improve clinical outcome in ST-segment elevation MI patients.

Contribution of delayed intracellular pH recovery to ischemic postconditioning protection

Ischemic postconditioning (PoCo) has been proven to be a feasible approach to attenuate reperfusion injury and enhance myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction, but its mechanisms have not been completely elucidated yet. Recent studies demonstrate that PoCo may delay the recovery of intracellular pH during initial reperfusion, and that its ability to limit infarct size critically depends on this effect. Prolongation of postischemic intracellular acidosis inhibits hypercontracture, mitochondrial permeability transition, calpain-mediated proteolysis, and gap junction-mediated spread of injury during the first minutes of reflow. This role of prolonged acidosis does not exclude the participation of other pathways in PoCo-induced cardioprotection. On the contrary, it may allow these pathways to act by preventing immediate reperfusion-induced cell death. Moreover, the existence of interactions between intracellular acidosis and endogenous protection signaling cannot be excluded and needs to be investigated. The role of prolonged acidosis in PoCo cardioprotection has important implications in the design of optimal PoCo protocols and in the translation of cardioprotective strategies to patients with on-going myocardial infarction receiving coronary reperfusion.

Postconditioning protects against human endothelial ischaemia-reperfusion injury via subtype-specific KATP channel activation and is mimicked by inhibition of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore

AIMS

Intermittent early reperfusion (ischaemic postconditioning; PostC) reduces ischaemia-reperfusion (IR) injury. Using an in vivo model of endothelial IR injury in humans, we sought to determine the role of K(ATP) channels in PostC and whether inhibition of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) at the onset of reperfusion protected against endothelial IR injury.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Endothelial function (EF) in healthy volunteers was assessed using vascular ultrasound to measure the percentage increase in the diameter of the brachial artery in response to reactive hyperaemia [flow-mediated dilatation (FMD)]. In resistance vessels, venous occlusion plethysmography was used to measure the dilator response to acetylcholine (ACh) [area under ACh dose-response curve (ACh AUC)]. Measurements were made before and after IR injury. Ischaemic postconditioning consisted of three 10 s cycles of alternating ischaemia and reperfusion in the first minute of reperfusion. Oral glibenclamide and glimepiride were used to determine the role of K(ATP) channel subtypes in PostC. Intra-arterial cyclosporine was used to determine the role of mPTP in endothelial IR injury. Ischaemia-reperfusion reduced EF in the brachial artery (FMD 7.1 ± 0.9% pre-IR, 2.8 ± 0.4% post-IR; P < 0.001) and resistance vessels [ACh AUC (×10(4)) 2.1 ± 0.4 pre-IR, 1.5 ± 0.2 post-IR; P < 0.05]. Ischaemic postconditioning preserved EF in the brachial artery [FMD 6.8 ± 0.9% (P < 0.001 vs. post-IR)] and resistance vessels [ACh AUC (×10(4)) 1.9 ± 0.2 (P < 0.001 vs. post-IR)]. Protection by PostC was abolished by glibenclamide in the brachial artery [FMD 3.3 ± 0.2% (P < 0.001 vs. post-IR + PostC)] and in resistance vessels [ACh AUC (×10(4)) 1.1 ± 0.2 (P < 0.001 vs. post-IR + PostC)], whereas glimepiride had no effect. Cyclosporine preserved EF after IR injury in the resistance vessels [ACh AUC (×10(4)) 1.4 ± 0.2 post-IR vs. 2.2 ± 0.3 post-IR + cyclosporine; P < 0.05].

CONCLUSION

Protection by PostC against endothelial IR injury in humans depends on K(ATP) channel activation and is mimicked by inhibition of the mPTP at reperfusion.

ST-Segment resolution and clinical outcome with ischemic postconditioning and comparison to magnetic resonance

BACKGROUND

Ischemic postconditioning (IPost) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is suggested to reduce myocardial damage. However, the association with ST-segment resolution (STR) and clinical outcome is not determined. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the association of IPost with STR and clinical outcome. Secondly, we sought to determine the relationship between STR and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters in these patients.

METHODS

One hundred eighteen patients referred for PPCI were randomly assigned to either conventional PPCI or PPCI with IPost. In a single electrocardiographic lead, STR was determined. Treatment modalities were compared as regards STR, ST-segment elevation, and the number of patients achieving complete-STR (≥70%), incomplete-STR (30%-70%), and no-STR (<30%). Patients were evaluated for clinical outcome after 15 months. Furthermore, patients with and without complete-STR were compared as regards CMR parameters.

RESULTS

There was a tendency toward a better outcome with IPost for the number of patients achieving complete-STR (55% vs 63%; P=.09), ST-segment elevation (1.41 vs 1.12 mm; P=.07), and New York Heart Association class (P=.06). No difference in other cardiac events was observed. Furthermore, data determine that patients with complete-STR have smaller infarct size (12.9% vs 21.1%; P<.01) and a better ejection fraction (55.7% vs 47.7%; P<.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with IPost are suggested to have improved STR and New York Heart Association classification. Infarct size and the functional CMR parameters were better in the patients with complete-STR; as to this, single-lead STR remains an important predictor for successful treatment in patients treated with IPost.

[Postconditioning in acute myocardial infarction: Primary angioplasty revisited?]

Early reperfusion of ischemic myocardium is the mean to improve prognosis of acute myocardial infarction. Nevertheless, reperfusion injury due to immediate acidosis correction and subsequent Ca(2+) overload results in formation of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore. The consequence is the death of viable myocardium due to onconecrosis and apoptosis. Mechanical (Stuttering reperfusion) or pharmacological postconditioning (cyclosporine A, adenosine…) is able to prevent reperfusion injury resulting in more myocardial salvage.

Pathogenesis of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury and rationale for therapy

Since the initial description of the phenomenon by Jennings et al 50 years ago, our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of reperfusion injury has grown significantly. Its pathogenesis reflects the confluence of multiple pathways, including ion channels, reactive oxygen species, inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction. The purposes of this review are to examine the current state of understanding of ischemia-reperfusion injury, as well as to highlight recent interventions aimed at this heretofore elusive target. In conclusion, despite its complexity our ongoing efforts to mitigate this form of injury should not be deterred, because nearly 2 million patients annually undergo either spontaneous (in the form of acute myocardial infarction) or iatrogenic (in the context of cardioplegic arrest) ischemia-reperfusion.

Postconditioning and protection from reperfusion injury: where do we stand? Position paper from the Working Group of Cellular Biology of the Heart of the European Society of Cardiology

Ischaemic postconditioning (brief periods of ischaemia alternating with brief periods of reflow applied at the onset of reperfusion following sustained ischaemia) effectively reduces myocardial infarct size in all species tested so far, including humans. Ischaemic postconditioning is a simple and safe manoeuvre, but because reperfusion injury is initiated within minutes of reflow, postconditioning must be applied at the onset of reperfusion. The mechanisms of protection by postconditioning include: formation and release of several autacoids and cytokines; maintained acidosis during early reperfusion; activation of protein kinases; preservation of mitochondrial function, most strikingly the attenuation of opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP). Exogenous recruitment of some of the identified signalling steps can induce cardioprotection when applied at the time of reperfusion in animal experiments, but more recently cardioprotection was also observed in a proof-of-concept clinical trial. Indeed, studies in patients with an acute myocardial infarction showed a reduction of infarct size and improved left ventricular function when they underwent ischaemic postconditioning or pharmacological inhibition of MPTP opening during interventional reperfusion. Further animal studies and large-scale human studies are needed to determine whether patients with different co-morbidities and co-medications respond equally to protection by postconditioning. Also, our understanding of the underlying mechanisms must be improved to develop new therapeutic strategies to be applied at reperfusion with the ultimate aim of limiting the burden of ischaemic heart disease and potentially providing protection for other organs at risk of reperfusion injury, such as brain and kidney.

Cardioprotective effects of ischemic postconditioning in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, evaluated by magnetic resonance

BACKGROUND

Postconditioning has been suggested to reduce myocardial damage during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. However, because clinical experience is limited, we examined the cardioprotective effects of postconditioning, using cardiac MRI in patients treated with PPCI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred eighteen patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction referred for PPCI were randomly assigned to have either conventional PPCI or PPCI with postconditioning. Postconditioning was performed immediately after obtained reperfusion with 4 balloon occlusions, each lasting 30 seconds, followed by 30 seconds of reperfusion. The primary end point was myocardial salvage after 3 months as judged by delayed enhancement cardiac MRI. We found a 19% relative reduction of infarct size in the postconditioning group (51+/-16% of total area at risk versus 63+/-17%, P<0.01), corresponding to a 31% increase in salvage ratio. The number of patients developing heart failure was significantly fewer in the postconditioning group (27% versus 46%, P=0.048). No significant evidence of interaction between the impact of postconditioning and the location of the culprit lesion or size of the myocardium at risk was detected (P=0.21 and P=0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

Mechanical postconditioning reduces infarct size in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction treated with PPCI. The impact of mechanical postconditioning seems to be independent of the size of myocardium at risk.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION- URL

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifier: NCT00507156.

Translation of remote ischaemic preconditioning into clinical practice

Reduction of the burden of ischaemia-reperfusion injury is the aim of most treatments for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. Although many strategies have proven benefit in the experimental arena, few have translated to clinical practice. Scientific and practical reasons might explain this finding, but the unpredictability of acute ischaemic syndromes is one of the biggest obstacles to timely application of novel treatments. Remote ischaemic preconditioning-which is a powerful innate mechanism of multiorgan protection that can be induced by transient occlusion of blood flow to a limb with a blood-pressure cuff-could be close to becoming a clinical technique. Several proof-of-principle and clinical trials have been reported, suggesting that the technique has remarkable promise. We examine the history, development, and present state of remote preconditioning in cardiovascular disease.

Ischemic postconditioning: experimental models and protocol algorithms

Ischemic postconditioning, a simple mechanical maneuver at the onset of reperfusion, reduces infarct size after ischemia/reperfusion. After its first description in 2003 by Zhao et al. numerous experimental studies have investigated this protective phenomenon. Whereas the underlying mechanisms and signal transduction are not yet understood in detail, infarct size reduction by ischemic postconditioning was confirmed in all species tested so far, including man. We have now reviewed the literature with focus on experimental models and protocols to better understand the determinants of protection by ischemic postconditioning or lack of it. Only studies with infarct size as unequivocal endpoint were considered. In all species and models, the duration of index ischemia and the protective protocol algorithm impact on the outcome of ischemic postconditioning, and gender, age, and myocardial temperature contribute.

Protective ischaemia in patients: preconditioning and postconditioning

Infarct size can be limited by reducing the determinants of infarct size or increasing collateral blood flow by treatment initiated before the ischaemic event. Reperfusion is the definitive treatment for permanently reducing infarct size and restoring some degree of contractile function to the affected myocardium. Innate survival mechanisms in the heart can be stimulated by short, non-lethal periods of ischaemia and reperfusion, applied either before or after the ischaemic event. Preconditioning, a series of transient intervals of ischaemia and reperfusion applied before the lethal 'index' ischaemic event, sets in motion molecular and cellular mechanisms that increase cardiomyocyte survival to a degree that had not hitherto been seen before. The cardioprotective ischaemic-reperfusion protocol applied at onset of reperfusion, termed 'postconditioning' (Postcon), is also associated with significant cardioprotection that can be applied at the point of reperfusion treatment in the catheterization laboratory or operating room. Both preconditioning and Postcon have been successfully applied to the clinical setting and have been found to reduce infarct size and other attributes of post-ischaemic injury. This review will summarize the physiological preclinical data on preconditioning and Postcon that are relevant to their translation to clinical therapeutics and treatment.

Clinical cardioprotection and the value of conditioning responses

Adjunctive cardioprotective strategies for ameliorating the reversible and irreversible injuries with ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) are highly desirable. However, after decades of research, the promise of clinical cardioprotection from I/R injury remains poorly realized. This may arise from the challenges of trialing and effectively translating experimental findings from laboratory models to patients. One can additionally consider whether features of the more heavily focused upon candidates could limit or preclude therapeutic utility and thus whether we might shift attention to alternate strategies. The phenomena of preconditioning and postconditioning have proven fertile in identification of experimental means of cardioprotection and are the most intensely interrogated responses in the field. However, there is evidence these processes, which share common molecular signaling elements and end effectors, may be poor choices for clinical exploitation. This includes evidence of age dependence, limiting efficacy in target aged or senescent hearts; refractoriness to conditioning stimuli in diseased myocardium; interference from a variety of relevant pharmaceuticals; inadvertent induction of these responses by prior ischemia or commonly used drugs, precluding further benefit; and sex dependence of protective signaling. This review focuses on these features, raising questions about current research strategies, and the suitability of these widely studied phenomena as rational candidates for clinical translation.

Preconditioning and postconditioning: underlying mechanisms and clinical application

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of death world-wide. Its major pathophysiological manifestation is acute myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury. Innovative treatment strategies for protecting the myocardium against the detrimental effects of this form of injury are required in order to improve clinical outcomes in patients with CHD. In this regard, harnessing the endogenous protection elicited by the heart's ability to 'condition' itself, has recently emerged as a powerful new strategy for limiting myocardial injury, preserving left ventricular systolic function and potentially improving morbidity and mortality in patients with CHD. 'Conditioning' the heart to tolerate the effects of acute ischaemia-reperfusion injury can be initiated through the application of several different mechanical and pharmacological strategies. Inducing brief non-lethal episodes of ischaemia and reperfusion to the heart either prior to, during, or even after an episode of sustained lethal myocardial ischaemia has the capacity to dramatically reduce myocardial injury--a phenomenon termed ischaemic preconditioning (IPC), preconditioning or postconditioning, respectively. Intriguingly, similar levels of cardioprotection can be achieved by applying the brief episodes of non-lethal ischaemia and reperfusion to an organ or tissue remote from the heart, thereby obviating the need to 'condition' the heart directly. This phenomenon has been termed remote ischaemic 'conditioning', and it can offer widespread systemic protection to other organs which are susceptible to acute ischaemia-reperfusion injury such as the brain, liver, intestine or kidney. Furthermore, the identification of the signalling pathways which underlie the effects of 'conditioning', has provided novel targets for pharmacological agents allowing one to recapitulate the benefits of these cardioprotective phenomena--so-termed pharmacological preconditioning and postconditioning. Initial clinical studies, reporting beneficial effects of 'conditioning' the heart to tolerate acute ischaemia-reperfusion injury, have been encouraging. Larger multi-centred randomised studies are now required to determine whether these 'conditioning' strategies are able to impact on clinical outcomes. In this article, we provide an overview of 'conditioning' in all its various forms, describe the underlying mechanisms and review the recent clinical application of this emerging cardioprotective strategy.