Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative flow ratio for assessment of coronary stenosis significance from a single angiographic view: A novel method based on bifurcation fractal law

Long-term prognostic value of Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio in jailed left circumflex coronary artery after left main crossover stenting

We aimed to evaluate the impact of new Murray law-based QFR of jailed left circumflex coronary artery (LCx) on long-term clinical outcomes after left main coronary artery (LM) simple crossover stenting. 164 patients who underwent LM-to-left anterior descending coronary artery simple crossover stenting and had appropriate angiographic view of LCx for QFR computation were enrolled. The primary clinical outcome was the 5-year target lesion failure (TLF), defined as a composite of cardiac death, a target vessel myocardial infarction or target lesion repeat revascularization. The mean QFR of the LCx after LM stent implantation was 0.88 ± 0.09, and 29 patients (17.7%) had a low QFR (< 0.80), which was significantly associated with a higher 5-year rate of TLF when compared with the high QFR group (27.6% vs. 6.7%; HR: 4.235; 95% CI 1.21-14.95; p = 0.0015). The 5-year LCx ostium-related TLR rate in the low QFR group was also higher (17.2% vs. 3.0% in the high QFR group; HR: 6.07, 95% CI 1.63-22.59, p = 0.002). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, a low QFR in the LCx after LM stenting was an independent predictor of the 5-year TLF rate (HR: 3.21, 95% CI 1.21-8.53; p = 0.019). ROC analysis showed that QFR a negative predictive value (NPV) of 89.6% ([AUC] 0.73, 95% CI 0.58-0.88, p < 0.05), the cutoff point is 0.85. The patients with a low QFR (< 0.80) in jailed LCX after LM simple crossover stenting had worse 5-year outcomes than those with a high QFR. Conversely, a QFR ≥ 0.85 of jailed LCx could serve as a good predictor of low risk of adverse outcome in LCx ostium. The QFR computation of the jailed LCx may be helpful to determine whether an additional procedure is required for the jailed side branch.

Short-Term Risk Stratification of Non-Flow-Limiting Coronary Stenosis by Angiographically Derived Radial Wall Strain

BACKGROUND

Deferred revascularization of mildly stenotic coronary vessels based exclusively on physiological evaluation is associated with up to 5% residual incidence of future adverse events at 1 year.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the incremental value of angiography-derived radial wall strain (RWS) in risk stratification of non-flow-limiting mild coronary narrowings.

METHODS

This is a post hoc analysis of 824 non-flow-limiting vessels in 751 patients from the FAVOR III China (Comparison of Quantitative Flow Ratio Guided and Angiography Guided Percutaneous Intervention in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease) trial. Each individual vessel had ≥1 mildly stenotic lesion. The primary outcome was vessel-oriented composite endpoint (VOCE), defined as the composite of vessel-related cardiac death, vessel-related myocardial infarction (nonprocedural), and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization at 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

During 1-year follow-up, VOCE occurred in 46 of 824 vessels, with a cumulative incidence of 5.6%. Maximum RWS (RWSmax) was predictive of 1-year VOCE with an area under the curve of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.58-0.77; P < 0.001). The incidence of VOCE was 14.3% in vessels with RWSmax >12% vs 2.9% in those with RWSmax ≤12%. In the multivariable Cox regression model, RWSmax >12% was a strong independent predictor of 1-year VOCE in deferred non-flow-limiting vessels (adjusted HR: 4.44; 95% CI: 2.43-8.14; P < 0.001). The risk of deferred revascularization based on combined normal RWSmax and Murray-law-based quantitative flow ratio (μQFR) was significantly reduced compared with μQFR alone (adjusted HR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.30-0.90; P = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

Among vessels with preserved coronary flow, angiography-derived RWS analysis has the potential to further discriminate vessels at risk of 1-year VOCE. (Comparison of Quantitative Flow Ratio Guided and Angiography Guided Percutaneous Intervention in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease [FAVOR III China Study]; NCT03656848).

Advances in Diagnosis, Therapy, and Prognosis of Coronary Artery Disease Powered by Deep Learning Algorithms

Percutaneous coronary intervention has been a standard treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery disease with continuous ebullient progress in technology and techniques. The application of artificial intelligence and deep learning in particular is currently boosting the development of interventional solutions, improving the efficiency and objectivity of diagnosis and treatment. The ever-growing amount of data and computing power together with cutting-edge algorithms pave the way for the integration of deep learning into clinical practice, which has revolutionized the interventional workflow in imaging processing, interpretation, and navigation. This review discusses the development of deep learning algorithms and their corresponding evaluation metrics together with their clinical applications. Advanced deep learning algorithms create new opportunities for precise diagnosis and tailored treatment with a high degree of automation, reduced radiation, and enhanced risk stratification. Generalization, interpretability, and regulatory issues are remaining challenges that need to be addressed through joint efforts from multidisciplinary community.

Quantitative flow ratio-guided versus angiography-guided operation for valve disease accompanying coronary heart disease

Background

Valve replacement combined with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) operation (VR + CABG) is usually associated with higher mortality and complication rates. Currently, angiography remains the most commonly used approach to guide CABG. The aim of this study is to investigate whether a quantitative flow ratio (QFR)-guided strategy can improve the clinical outcomes of VR + CABG.

Methods

Patients (n = 536) treated by VR + CABG between January 2018 and December 2021 were retrospectively assessed. In 116 patients, all lesions were revascularized entirely based on QFR (the QFR-guided group), whereas in 420 patients, all lesions were revascularized entirely based on angiography (the angiography-guided group). To minimize selection bias between the 2 groups, propensity score matching was performed at a ratio of 1:2. The primary endpoint of the study was the rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 1-year, which was defined as a composite of cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), any repeat revascularization, and stroke.

Results

No statistically significant differences were observed in the baseline clinical characteristics between the QFR-guided and angiography-guided groups after propensity score matching. The mean age of all patients was 66.2 years [standard deviation (SD) = 8.3], 370 (69%) were men, the mean body-mass index of the population was 24.8 kg/m² (SD = 4.5), 129 (24%) had diabetes, and 229 (43%) had angina symptoms. When compared with the angiography-guided group, the QFR-guided group had a significantly shorter operative time (323 ± 60 min vs. 343 ± 71 min, P = 0.010), extra corporal circulation time (137 ± 38 min vs. 155 ± 62 min, P = 0.004), clamp time (73 ± 19 min vs. 81 ± 18 min, P < 0.001), and less intraoperative bleeding volume (640 ± 148 ml vs. 682 ± 166 ml, P = 0.022). Compared with the angiography-guided group, the 1-year MACCE was significantly lower in the QFR-guided group (6.9% vs. 14.7%, P = 0.036, hazard ratio = 0.455, 95% confidence interval: 0.211-0.982).

Conclusion

Our results raise the hypothesis that among patients who undergo VR + CABG, QFR-guided strategy is associated with optimized surgical procedure and a superior clinical outcome, as evidenced by a lower rate of MACCE at 1-year compared with conventional angiography-guided strategy.

Coronary Physiology as Part of a State-of-the-Art Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategy: Lessons from SYNTAX II and Beyond

The use of coronary physiology allows for rational decision making at the time of PCI, contributing to better patient outcomes. Yet, coronary physiology is only one aspect of optimal revascularization. State-of-the-art PCI must also consider other important aspects such as intracoronary imaging guidance and specific procedural expertise, as tested in the SYNTAX II study. In this review, we highlight the technical aspects pertaining to the use of physiology as used in that trial and offer a glimpse into the future with emerging physiologic metrics, including functional coronary angiography, which have already established themselves as useful indices to guide decision making.

Outcomes of Functionally Complete vs Incomplete Revascularization: Insights From the FAVOR III China Trial

BACKGROUND

Functional complete revascularization (FCR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as determined by the residual functional SYNTAX score (rFSS) based on pressure wire fractional flow reserve assessment has been associated with an improved prognosis.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the rates and clinical implications of FCR as assessed by the quantitative flow ratio (QFR), and to determine the outcomes of pre-PCI QFR guidance compared with standard angiography guidance in patients achieving and not achieving FCR after PCI.

METHODS

In the randomized, sham-controlled, blinded, multicenter FAVOR (Comparison of Quantitative Flow Ratio Guided and Angiography Guided Percutaneous Intervention in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease) III China trial, QFR-guided PCI reduced the 1-year rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) compared with angiography-guided PCI. In the present prespecified substudy, the incidence of MACE was compared according to the presence of post-PCI FCR (rFSS = 0 based on core laboratory-assessed QFR) in the QFR-guided and angiography-guided groups.

RESULTS

Among 3,781 patients with available rFSS assessments, 3,221 (85.2%) achieved FCR, including 88.1% after QFR guidance and 82.2% after angiography guidance (P < 0.001). Patients with FCR had a markedly lower rate of 1-year MACE compared with those with functional incomplete revascularization (FIR) (rFSS ≥1) (5.1% vs 19.7%; P < 0.001). Prognostic models including the rFSS had higher discrimination and reclassification ability than those with the anatomic residual SYNTAX score. The relative risks for 1-year MACE with QFR-guided compared with the angiography-guided lesion selection were consistent in patients achieving FCR (4.1% vs 6.3%; HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.47-0.88) and in those with FIR (18.7% vs 20.4%; HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.61-1.32) (P_interaction = 0.19).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large-scale trial, achieving FCR after PCI was associated with markedly lower 1-year rates of MACE. Compared with standard angiography guidance, QFR-guided PCI lesion selection improved the likelihood of achieving FCR and improved 1-year clinical outcomes in patients with both FCR and FIR.

1-Year Patency of Biorestorative Polymeric Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts in an Ovine Model

Many attempts have been made to inhibit or counteract saphenous vein graft (SVG) failure modes; however, only external support for SVGs has gained momentum in clinical utility. This study revealed the feasibility of implantation, and showed good patency out to 12 months of the novel biorestorative graft, in a challenging ovine coronary artery bypass graft model. This finding could trigger the first-in-man trial of using the novel material instead of SVG. We believe that, eventually, this novel biorestorative bypass graft can be one of the options for coronary artery bypass graft patients who have difficulty harvesting SVG.

In Vivo Validation of a Novel Computational Approach to Assess Microcirculatory Resistance Based on a Single Angiographic View

(1) Background: In spite of the undeniable clinical value of the index of microvascular resistance (IMR) in assessing the status of coronary microcirculation, its use globally remains very low. The aim of this study was to validate the novel single-view, pressure-wire- and adenosine-free angiographic microvascular resistance (AMR) index, having the invasive wire-based IMR as a reference standard. (2) Methods: one hundred and sixty-three patients (257 vessels) were investigated with pressure wire-based IMR. Microvascular dysfunction (CMD) was defined by IMR ≥ 25. AMR was independently computed from the diagnostic coronary angiography in a blinded fashion. (3) Results: AMR demonstrated a good correlation (r = 0.83, p < 0.001) and diagnostic performance (AUC 0.94; 95% CI: 0.91 to 0.97) compared with wire-based IMR. The best cutoff value for AMR in determining IMR ≥ 25 was 2.5 mmHg*s/cm. The overall diagnostic accuracy of AMR was 87.2% (95% CI: 83.0% to 91.3%), with a sensitivity of 93.5% (95% CI: 87.0% to 97.3%), a specificity of 82.7% (95% CI: 75.6% to 88.4%), a positive predictive value of 79.4% (95% CI: 71.2% to 86.1%) and a negative predictive value of 94.7% (95% CI: 89.3% to 97.8%). No difference in terms of CMD rate was described among different clinical presentations. (4) Conclusions: AMR derived solely from a single angiographic view is a feasible computational alternative to pressure wire-based IMR, with good diagnostic accuracy in assessing CMD.

Coronary physiology in the catheterisation laboratory: an A to Z practical guide

Coronary revascularisation, either percutaneous or surgical, aims to improve coronary flow and relieve myocardial ischaemia. The decision-making process in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) remains largely based on invasive coronary angiography (ICA), even though until recently ICA could not assess the functional significance of coronary artery stenoses. Invasive wire-based approaches for physiological evaluations were developed to properly assess the ischaemic relevance of epicardial CAD. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and later, instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), were shown to improve clinical outcomes in several patient subsets when used for coronary revascularisation guidance or deferral and for procedural optimisation of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) results. Despite accumulating evidence and positive guideline recommendations, the adoption of invasive physiology has remained quite low, mainly due to technical and economic issues as well as to operator-resistance to change. Coronary image-based computational physiology has been recently developed, with promising results in terms of accuracy and a reduction in computational time, costs, radiation exposure and risks for the patient. Lastly, the integration of intracoronary imaging and physiology allows for individualised PCI treatment, aiming at complete relief of ischaemia through optimised morpho-functional immediate procedural results. Instead of a conventional state-of-the-art review, this A to Z dictionary attempts to provide a practical guide for the application of coronary physiology in the catheterisation laboratory, exploring several methods, their pitfalls, and useful tips and tricks.

Coronary Bifurcation Lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs) is still technically demanding, mainly because of higher rates of both acute and chronic complication as compared with non-CBLs. Although provisional stenting (PS) is considered as the preferred strategy for most of the CBLs, a systematic two-stent technique (double kissing [DK] crush) should be considered in patients with complex left main (LM)-CBLs or non-LM-CBLs stratified by the DEFINITION criteria. Intracoronary imaging and/or physiologic evaluation should be used to optimize CBLs intervention. PCI with DES for the treatment of CBLs is technically demanding, mainly because of higher rates of both acute and chronic complication as compared with non-CBLs. PS is a default strategy for most of the CBLs. Double kissing (DK) crush is associated with better clinical outcomes compared with PS in patients with complex LM-CBLs or non-LM-CBLs stratified by the DEFINITION criteria. Intracoronary imaging and/or physiologic evaluation are useful tools to guide the treatment of CBLs. The use of drug-coated balloons in CBLs needs further data to support the clinical benefits.

Feasibility of Quantitative Flow Ratio Virtual Stenting for Guidance of Serial Coronary Lesions Intervention

Background

Coronary physiology measurement in serial coronary lesions with multiple stenoses is challenging. Therefore, we evaluated the feasibility of Murray fractal law‐based quantitative flow ratio (μQFR) virtual stenting for guidance of serial coronary lesions intervention.

Methods and Results

Patients who underwent elective coronary angiography and had 2 serial de novo coronary lesions of 30% to 90% diameter stenosis by visual estimation were prospectively enrolled. μQFR and fractional flow reserve (FFR) were assessed after coronary angiography. In vessels with an FFR ≤0.80, the lesion with the larger pressure gradient was considered to be the primary lesion and treated firstly, followed by FFR measurement. The second lesion was stented when FFR ≤0.80. All μQFR and predicted μQFR after stenting were calculated from diagnostic coronary angiography before interventions, with the analysts masked to the FFR data. A total of 54 patients with 61 target vessels were interrogated. Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 44 vessels with FFR ≤0.80. After stenting the primary lesions, 14 nonprimary lesions had FFR ≤0.80 and a second drug‐eluting stent was implanted. There was excellent correlation (r=0.97, P<0.001) and good agreement (mean difference: 0.00±0.03) between baseline μQFR and FFR in identifying flow‐limiting lesions. Per‐vessel diagnostic accuracy of μQFR on de novo lesions was 96.7% (95% CI, 88.7%–99.6%). μQFR and FFR are highly consistent (93.2%) in identifying the primary lesion requiring revascularization. After stenting the primary lesions, per‐vessel diagnostic accuracy of predicted μQFR for identifying the significance of the nonprimary lesion was 90.9%. Predicted residual μQFR with virtual stenting was higher than final FFR (mean difference: 0.05±0.06).

Conclusions

In vessels with serial coronary lesions, virtual stenting by μQFR can identify the primary flow‐limiting lesion for revascularization.

Radial wall strain: a novel angiographic measure of plaque composition and vulnerability

BACKGROUND

The lipid-to-cap ratio (LCR) and thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) derived from optical coherence tomography (OCT) are indicative of plaque vulnerability.

AIMS

We aimed to explore the association of a novel method to estimate radial wall strain (RWS) from angiography with plaque composition and features of vulnerability assessed by OCT.

METHODS

Anonymised data from patients with intermediate stenosis who underwent coronary angiography (CAG) and OCT were analysed in a core laboratory. Angiography-derived RWSmax was computed as the maximum deformation of lumen diameter throughout the cardiac cycle, expressed as a percentage of the largest lumen diameter. The LCR and TCFA were automatically determined on OCT images by a recently validated algorithm based on artificial intelligence.

RESULTS

OCT and CAG images from 114 patients (124 vessels) were analysed. The average time for the analysis of RWSmax was 57 (39-82) seconds. The RWSmax in the interrogated plaques was 12% (10-15%) and correlated positively with the LCR (r=0.584; p<0.001) and lipidic plaque burden (r=0.411; p<0.001), and negatively with fibrous cap thickness (r= -0.439; p<0.001). An RWSmax >12% was an angiographic predictor for an LCR >0.33 (area under the curve [AUC]=0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-0.91; p<0.001) and TCFA (AUC=0.72, 95% CI: 0.63-0.80; p<0.001). Lesions with RWSmax >12% had a higher prevalence of TCFA (22.0% versus 1.5%; p<0.001), thinner fibrous cap thickness (71 μm versus 101 μm; p<0.001), larger lipidic plaque burden (23.3% versus 15.4%; p<0.001), and higher maximum LCR (0.41 versus 0.18; p<0.001) compared to lesions with RWSmax ≤12%.

CONCLUSIONS

Angiography-derived RWS was significantly correlated with plaque composition and known OCT features of plaque vulnerability in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis.

Morphometric Assessment for Functional Evaluation of Coronary Stenosis with Optical Coherence Tomography and the Optical Flow Ratio in a Vessel with Single Stenosis

Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in identifying functionally significant coronary stenosis in a vessel with single stenosis. Background: The OCT-based morphofunctional computational method for deriving the optical flow ratio (OFR) has diagnostic value, as it can identify the functional severity of coronary stenosis, but the ability of the OFR to aid the OCT in determining coronary stenosis hemodynamics in single-stenosis lesion remains unclear. Methods: 74 vessels with single stenosis were studied in 69 patients; all cases were performed through OCT and quantitative flow ratio (QFR), and OCT images were used to perform OFR. Results: Among vessels with single stenosis, OFR showed a good correlation with QFR (r = 0.86; p < 0.001). Taking QFR as the standard, the vessel-level diagnosis accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of OFR were 90% (95% CI: 81 to 96), 94% (95% CI: 77 to 99), 88% (95% CI: 74 to 96), 85% (95% CI: 68 to 94) and 95% (95% CI: 82 to 99), respectively. Among vessels with OFR/QFR concordance, both the minimum lumen area (MLA) and minimum lumen diameter (MLD) showed excellent diagnostic efficiency (MLA: area under the curve (AUC) = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85 to 0.98, p < 0.001; MLD: AUC = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.86 to 0.98, p < 0.001) in determining the functional significance of coronary stenosis in a single stenosis lesion, and the best cutoff values were 1.55 mm2 and 1.40 mm. Conclusions: OFR has a good correlation with QFR. OCT-measured MLA and MLD have excellent diagnostic efficiency in identifying the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis in a vessel with single stenosis.

Angiography derived assessment of the coronary microcirculation: is it ready for prime time?

INTRODUCTION

Non-obstructive coronary arteries (NOCA) are present in 39.7% to 62.4% of patients who undergo elective angiography. Coronary microcirculation (<400 µm) is not visible on angiography therefore functional assessment, invasive or non-invasive plays a prior role to help provide a more personalized diagnosis of angina.

AREA COVERED

In this review, we revise the pathophysiology, clinical importance and invasive assessment of the coronary microcirculation, and discuss angiography-derived indices of microvascular resistance. A comprehensive literature review over four decades is also undertaken.

EXPERT OPINION

The coronary microvasculature plays an important role in flow autoregulation and metabolic regulation. Invasive assessment of microvascular resistance is a validated modality with independent prognostic value, nevertheless, its routine application is hampered by the requirement of intravascular instrumentation and hyperaemic agents. The angiography-derived index of microvascular resistance has emerged as a promising surrogate in pilot studies, however, more data are needed to validate and compare the diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of different equations as well as to illustrate the relationship between angiography-derived parameters for epicardial coronary arteries and those for the microvasculature.

Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations

The Bifurcation Academic Research Consortium (Bif-ARC) project originated from the need to overcome the paucity of standardization and comparability between studies involving bifurcation coronary lesions. This document is the result of a collaborative effort between academic research organizations and the most renowned interventional cardiology societies focused on bifurcation lesions in Europe, the United States, and Asia. This consensus provides standardized definitions for bifurcation lesions; the criteria to judge the side branch relevance; the procedural, mechanistic, and clinical endpoints for every type of bifurcation study; and the follow-up methods. Considering the complexity of bifurcation lesions and their evaluation, detailed instructions and technical aspects for site and core laboratory analysis of bifurcation lesions are also reported. The recommendations included within this consensus will facilitate pooled analyses and the effective comparison of data in the future, improving the clinical relevance of trials in bifurcation lesions, and the quality of care in this subset of patients.

Comparison of coronary CT angiography-based and invasive coronary angiography-based quantitative flow ratio for functional assessment of coronary stenosis: A multicenter retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography (CTA)-based quantitative flow ratio (QFR), namely CT-QFR, and compare it with invasive coronary angiography (ICA)-based Murray law QFR (μQFR), using fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the reference standard.

METHODS

Patients who underwent coronary CTA, ICA and pressure wire-based FFR assessment within two months were retrospectively analyzed. CT-QFR and μQFR were computed in blinded fashion and compared with FFR, all applying the same cut-off value of ≤0.80 to identify hemodynamically significant stenosis.

RESULTS

Paired comparison between CT-QFR and μQFR was performed in 191 vessels from 167 patients. Average FFR was 0.81 ​± ​0.10 and 42.4% vessels had an FFR ≤0.80. CT-QFR had a slightly lower correlation with FFR compared with μQFR, although statistically non-significant (r ​= ​0.87 versus 0.90, p ​= ​0.110). The vessel-level diagnostic performance of CT-QFR was slightly lower but without statistical significance than μQFR (AUC ​= ​0.94 versus 0.97, difference: -0.03 [95%CI: -0.00-0.06], p ​= ​0.095), and substantially higher than diameter stenosis by CTA (AUC difference: 0.17 [95%CI: -0.10-0.23], p ​< ​0.001). The patient-level diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio for CT-QFR to identify FFR value ​≤ ​0.80 was 88%, 90%, 86%, 86%, 91%, 6.59 and 0.12, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of CT-QFR was 84% in extensively calcified lesions, while in vessels with no or less calcification, CT-QFR showed a comparable diagnostic accuracy with μQFR (91% versus 92%, p ​= ​0.595). Intra- and inter-observer variability in CT-QFR analysis was -0.00 ​± ​0.04 and 0.00 ​± ​0.04, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Performance in diagnosis of hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis by CT-QFR was slightly lower but without statistical significance than μQFR, and substantially higher than CTA-derived diameter stenosis. Extensively calcified lesions reduced the diagnostic accuracy of CT-QFR.

Diagnostic accuracy of CCTA-derived versus angiography-derived quantitative flow ratio (CAREER) study: a prospective study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Coronary CT angiography (CCTA)-derived quantitative flow ratio (CT-QFR) is a novel non-invasive technology to assess the physiological significance of coronary stenoses, which enables fast and on-site computation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) from CCTA images. The objective of this investigator-initiated, prospective, single-centre clinical trial is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CT-QFR with respect to angiography-derived QFR, using FFR as the reference standard.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A total of 216 patients who have at least one lesion with a diameter stenosis of 30%-90% in an artery with ≥2.0 mm reference diameter will be enrolled in the study. FFR will be measured during invasive coronary angiography. CT-QFR and QFR will be assessed in two independent core laboratories in a blinded fashion. The primary endpoint is the diagnostic accuracy of CT-QFR in identifying haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis with FFR as the reference standard. The major secondary endpoint is the non-inferiority of CT-QFR compared with QFR in the patients without extensively calcified lesions.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University (2020K192). Outcomes will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at scientific conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04665817.

Angiographic Lesion Morphology Provides Incremental Value to Generalize Quantitative Flow Ratio for Predicting Myocardial Ischemia

Aim

The quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is favorable for functional assessment of coronary artery stenosis without pressure wires and induction of hyperemia. The aim of this study was to explore whether angiographic lesion morphology provides incremental value to generalize QFR for predicting myocardial ischemia in unselected patients.

Methods

This study was a substudy to the CT-FFR CHINA trial, referring 345 participants from five centers with suspected coronary artery disease on coronary CT angiography for diagnostic invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Fractional flow reserve (FFR) was measured in all vessels with 30–90% diameter stenosis. QFR was calculated in 186 lesions from 159 participants in a blinded manner. In addition, parameters to characterize lesion features were recorded or measured, including left anterior descending arteries (LADs)-involved lesions, side branch located at stenotic lesion (BL), multiple lesions (ML), minimal lumen diameter (MLD), reference lumen diameter (RLD), percent diameter stenosis (%DS), lesion length (LL), and LL/MLD4. Logistic regression was used to construct two kinds of models by combining single or two lesion parameters with the QFR. The performances of these models were compared with that of QFR on a per-vessel level.

Results

A total of 148 participants (mean age: 59.5 years; 101 men) with 175 coronary arteries were included for final analysis. In total, 81 (46%) vessels were considered hemodynamically significant. QFR correctly classified 82.29% of the vessels using FFR with a cutoff of 0.80 as reference standard. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of QFR was 0.86 with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 80.25, 84.04, 81.25, and 83.16%, respectively. The combined models (QFR + LAD + MLD, QFR + LAD + %DS, QFR + BL + MLD, and QFR + BL + %DS) outperformed QFR with higher AUCs (0.91 vs. 0.86, P = 0.02; 0.91 vs. 0.86, P = 0.02; 0.91 vs. 0.86, P = 0.02; 0.90 vs. 0.86, P = 0.03, respectively). Compared with QFR, the sensitivity of the combined models (QFR + BL and QFR + MLD) was improved (91.36 vs. 80.25%, 91.36 vs. 80.25%, respectively, both P &lt; 0.05) without compromised specificity or accuracy.

Conclusion

Combined with angiographic lesion parameters, QFR can be optimized for predicting myocardial ischemia in unselected patients.

Functional comparison of different jailed balloon techniques in treating non-left main coronary bifurcation lesions

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of data comparing functional difference between active jailed balloon technique (A-JBT) and conventional jailed balloon technique (C-JBT) in treating non-left main coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs).

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we consecutively enrolled 232 patients with non-left main CBLs who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using JBTs between January 2018 and March 2019. Among them, 191 patients entered the final analysis with 12-months angiographic follow-up. We stratified patients into A-JBT group (130 patients) and C-JBT group (61 patients). The functional analysis by Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio (μQFR) and Seattleanginaquestionnaire (SAQ) were performed to compare the two techniques.

RESULTS

Compared with C-JBT group, A-JBT group observed a lower abrupt (0.8% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.002) and final SB occlusion (0 vs. 7.9%, p = 0.005). Meanwhile, A-JBT group had a significantly higher μQFR of side branch (SB) both post-PCI and 12-months follow-up (median [interquartile range (IQR)]: 0.91 (0.86-0.96) vs. 0.82 (0.69-0.92), p < 0.001; median [IQR]: 0.95 (0.89-0.98) vs. 0.85 (0.74-0.93), p < 0.001) than C-JBT group. Besides, A-JBT group gained a μQFR improvement at follow-up period compared with post-PCI data (median [IQR]: 0.95 [0.89-0.98] vs. 0.91[0.86-0.96] of SB, p < 0.001) and a higher SAQ scores at 12-months follow-up compared with C-JBT group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with C-JBT, A-JBT provided excellent SB protection during MV stenting and improved the SB functional blood flow as well as the angina relief even after 12 months.

Reproducibility of quantitative flow ratio: the QREP study

BACKGROUND

Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a tool for physiological lesion assessment based on invasive coronary angiography.

AIMS

We aimed to assess the reproducibility of QFR computed from the same angiograms as assessed by multiple observers from different, international sites.

METHODS

We included 50 patients previously enrolled in dedicated QFR studies. QFR was computed twice, one month apart by five blinded observers. The main analysis was the coefficient of variation (CV) as a measure of intra- and inter-observer reproducibility. Key secondary analysis was the identification of clinical and procedural characteristics predicting reproducibility.

RESULTS

The intra-observer CV ranged from 2.3% (1.5-2.8) to 10.2% (6.6-12.0) among the observers. The inter-observer CV was 9.4% (8.0-10.5). The QFR observer, low angiographic quality, and low fractional flow reserve (FFR) were independent predictors of a large absolute difference between repeated QFR measurements defined as a difference larger than the median difference (>0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The inter- and intra-observer reproducibility for QFR computed from the same angiograms ranged from high to poor among multiple observers from different sites with an average agreement of 0.01±0.08 for repeated measurements. The reproducibility was dependent on the observer, angiographic quality and the coronary artery stenosis severity as assessed by FFR.

Diagnostic performance of intravascular ultrasound-based fractional flow reserve versus angiography-based quantitative flow ratio measurements for evaluating left main coronary artery stenosis

OBJECTIVES

We compared the diagnostic performance of the ultrasonic flow ratio (UFR) and quantitative flow ratio (QFR) for left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis.

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of LMCA stenosis remains challenging because of its complex pathogenesis and severity. Computing QFR allows rapid determination of fractional flow reserve (FFR) from coronary angiograms. A novel intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-based FFR (UFR) allows rapid FFR computation from IVUS images. Neither of the computational approaches required a pressure wire or hyperemia induction. Previous studies have validated the good diagnostic accuracy of QFR and UFR in identifying hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis using FFR as the reference standard.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study enrolled consecutive patients with intermediate-grade LMCA stenosis who underwent IVUS evaluation. UFR and QFR of all LMCA stenosis patients were assessed, their correlation and agreement were analyzed, and diagnostic performance of UFR in LMCA stenosis was evaluated.

RESULTS

Eighty-three paired comparisons between UFR and QFR were obtained. UFR excellently correlated with QFR (r = 0.74, p < 0.01). The Bland-Altman plot showed good agreement between UFR and QFR (mean differences: 0.01 ± 0.05, p = 0.34). The area under the curve of UFR for identifying physiological LMCA stenosis was 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93-1.00, p < 0.01). The overall UFR diagnostic accuracy was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.88-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

UFR showed excellent correlation and good agreement with QFR in LMCA stenosis assessment, indicating that it is highly feasible to use UFR for functional evaluation of LMCA stenosis.

Functional Assessment of Cerebral Artery Stenosis by Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio: A Pilot Study

Background

Increasing attention has been paid to the hemodynamic evaluation of cerebral arterial stenosis. We aimed to demonstrate the performance of angiography-based quantitative flow ratio (QFR) to assess hemodynamic alterations caused by luminal stenoses, using invasive fractional pressure ratios (FPRs) as a reference standard.

Methods

Between March 2013 and December 2019, 29 patients undergoing the pressure gradient measurement of cerebral atherosclerosis were retrospectively enrolled. Wire-based FPR was defined by the arterial pressure distal to the stenotic lesion (Pd) to proximal (Pa) pressure ratios (Pd/Pa). FPR < 0.70 or FPR < 0.75 was assumed as hemodynamically significant stenosis. The new method of computing QFR from a single angiographic view, i.e., the Murray law-based QFR, was applied to the interrogated vessel. An artificial intelligence algorithm was developed to realize the automatic delineation of vascular contour.

Results

Fractional pressure ratio and QFR were assessed in 38 vessels from 29 patients. Excellent correlation and agreement were observed between QFR and FPR [r = 0.879, P < 0.001; mean difference (bias): −0.006, 95% limits of agreement: −0.198 to 0.209, respectively). Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability in QFR were excellent (intra-class correlation coefficients, 0.996 and 0.973, respectively). For predicting FPR < 0.70, the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) of QFR was 0.946 (95% CI, 0.820 to 0.993%). The sensitivity and specificity of QFR < 0.70 for identifying FPR < 0.70 was 88.9% (95% CI, 65.3 to 98.6%) and 85.0% (95% CI, 62.1 to 96.8%). For predicting FPR < 0.75, QFR showed similar performance with an AUC equal to 0.926.

Conclusion

Computational QFR from a single angiographic view achieved comparable results to the wire-based FPR. The excellent diagnostic performance and repeatability empower QFR with high feasibility in the functional assessment of cerebral arterial stenosis.

Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Compared with visual angiographic assessment, pressure wire-based physiological measurement more accurately identifies flow-limiting lesions in patients with coronary artery disease. Nonetheless, angiography remains the most widely used method to guide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In FAVOR III China, we aimed to establish whether clinical outcomes might be improved by lesion selection for PCI using the quantitative flow ratio (QFR), a novel angiography-based approach to estimate the fractional flow reserve.

METHODS

FAVOR III China is a multicentre, blinded, randomised, sham-controlled trial done at 26 hospitals in China. Patients aged 18 years or older, with stable or unstable angina pectoris or patients who had a myocardial infarction at least 72 h before screening, who had at least one lesion with a diameter stenosis of 50-90% in a coronary artery with a reference vessel of at least 2·5 mm diameter by visual assessment were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned to a QFR-guided strategy (PCI performed only if QFR ≤0·80) or an angiography-guided strategy (PCI based on standard visual angiographic assessment). Participants and clinical assessors were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was the 1-year rate of major adverse cardiac events, a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or ischaemia-driven revascularisation. The primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03656848).

FINDINGS

Between Dec 25, 2018, and Jan 19, 2020, 3847 patients were enrolled. After exclusion of 22 patients who elected not to undergo PCI or who were withdrawn by their physicians, 3825 participants were included in the intention-to-treat population (1913 in the QFR-guided group and 1912 in the angiography-guided group). The mean age was 62·7 years (SD 10·1), 2699 (70·6%) were men and 1126 (29·4%) were women, 1295 (33·9%) had diabetes, and 2428 (63·5%) presented with an acute coronary syndrome. The 1-year primary endpoint occurred in 110 (Kaplan-Meier estimated rate 5·8%) participants in the QFR-guided group and in 167 (8·8%) participants in the angiography-guided group (difference, -3·0% [95% CI -4·7 to -1·4]; hazard ratio 0·65 [95% CI 0·51 to 0·83]; p=0·0004), driven by fewer myocardial infarctions and ischaemia-driven revascularisations in the QFR-guided group than in the angiography-guided group.

INTERPRETATION

In FAVOR III China, among patients undergoing PCI, a QFR-guided strategy of lesion selection improved 1-year clinical outcomes compared with standard angiography guidance.

FUNDING

Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and the National Clinical Research Centre for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital.

Effect of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor duration on the clinical prognosis of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with no-/slow-reflow phenomenon

BACKGROUND

In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) accompanied by the no-/slow-reflow phenomenon, the maintenance duration of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) is controversial. We compare the efficacy and safety of short- and long-term GPI infusion in STEMI patients with the no-/slow-reflow phenomenon.

METHODS

From June 2016 to December 2019, we continuously included patients with on-set STEMI who underwent pPCI, accompanied by the no-/slow-reflow, during interventional procedures at Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital and Zhuhai Golden Bay Hospital. The hemorrhage events, heart function, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were compared between < 24 h and ≥ 24 h GPI duration groups. The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to estimate the 1-year MACE-free survival at different GPI utility times.

RESULTS

In total, 127 patients were divided into two groups based on the duration of tirofiban use (less and more than 24 h). There was no significant difference between two groups in terms of baseline characteristics, plaque condition, and coronary physiological function. The two groups showed similar in-hospital MACE (1 [1.85%] vs. 4 [5.48%], p = 0.394) and 1-year MACE-free survival (log-rank test p = 0.9085). The 1-year MACE remained consistent between the two groups in all subgroups of different risk factors of no-/slow-reflow. There was no significant difference in heart function and in-hospital hemorrhage events (3.7% vs. 1.37%, p = 0.179).

CONCLUSION

In the real world, prolonging the duration of GPI may not significantly improve the clinical outcome in patients with STEMI with no-/slow-reflow.

Comparison of Clinically Adjudicated Versus Flow-Based Adjudication of Revascularization Events in Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

In clinical trials, the optimal method of adjudicating revascularization events as clinically or nonclinically indicated (CI) is to use an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC). However, the Academic Research Consortium-2 currently recommends using physiological assessment. The level of agreement between these methods of adjudication remains unknown.

METHODS

Data for all CEC adjudicated revascularization events among the 3457 patients followed-up for 2-years in the TALENT trial, and 3-years in the DESSOLVE III, PIONEER, and SYNTAX II trial were collected and readjudicated according to a quantitative flow ratio (QFR) analysis of the revascularized vessels, by an independent core lab blinded to the results of the conventional CEC adjudication. The κ statistic was used to assess the level of agreement between the 2 methods.

RESULTS

In total, 351 CEC-adjudicated repeat revascularization events occurred, with retrospective QFR analysis successfully performed in 212 (60.4%). According to QFR analysis, 104 events (QFR ≤0.80) were adjudicated as CI revascularizations and 108 (QFR >0.80) were not. The agreement between CEC and QFR based adjudication was just fair (κ=0.335). Between the 2 methods of adjudication, there was a disagreement of 26.4% and 7.1% in CI and non-CI revascularization, respectively. Overall, the concordance and discordance rates were 66.5% and 33.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this event-level analysis, QFR based adjudication had a relatively low agreement with CEC adjudication with respect to whether revascularization events were CI or not. CEC adjudication appears to overestimate CI revascularization as compared with QFR adjudication. Direct comparison between these 2 strategies in terms of revascularization adjudication is warranted in future trials. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: TALENT trial: NCT02870140, DESSOLVE III trial: NCT02385279, SYNTAX II: NCT02015832, and PIONEER trial: NCT02236975.

Automatic Coregistration Between Coronary Angiography and Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography

This study sought to evaluate a novel approach for automatic coregistration of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and coronary angiography. Lumen diameters and side branches from both coronary angiography and OCT were used to create 2 feature sets. Subsequently, a 2-step coregistration approach was performed on the feature sets for matching of each OCT cross section on the angiographic centerline. For validation, all side branches with ≥1.0 mm diameter were identified and used as paired fiduciary landmarks. Geographical error was defined as the distance between the automatically coregistered and the true-paired landmarks. Altogether 212 vessels from 181 patients were analyzed. Mismatch of coronary angiography and OCT occurred in 64 of 1,530 reference landmarks. Median geographical error was 0.32 (interquartile range: 0.00-0.56) mm. The mean time for coregistration was 20.69 ± 1.07 seconds. In conclusion, fast and automatic coregistration of OCT and angiography using a single standard angiographic loop is feasible and accurate.

A prospective multicenter validation study for a novel angiography-derived physiological assessment software: Rationale and design of the radiographic imaging validation and evaluation for Angio-iFR (ReVEAL iFR) study

Angiography-derived physiological assessment of coronary lesions has emerged as an alternative to wire-based assessment aiming at less-invasiveness and shorter procedural time as well as cost effectiveness in physiology-guided decision making. However, current available image-derived physiology software have limitations including the requirement of multiple projections and are time consuming. METHODS/DESIGN: The ReVEAL iFR (Radiographic imaging Validation and EvALuation for Angio-iFR) trial is a multicenter, multicontinental, validation study which aims to validate the diagnostic accuracy of the Angio-iFR medical software device (Philips, San Diego, US) in patients undergoing angiography for Chronic Coronary Syndrome (CCS). The Angio-iFR will enable operators to predict both the iFR and FFR value within a few seconds from a single projection of cine angiography by using a lumped parameter fluid dynamics model. Approximately 440 patients with at least one de-novo 40% to 90% stenosis by visual angiographic assessment will be enrolled in the study. The primary endpoint is the sensitivity and specificity of the iFR and FFR for a given lesion compared to the corresponding invasive measures. The enrollment started in August 2019, and was completed in March 2021. SUMMARY: The Angio-iFR system has the potential of simplifying physiological evaluation of coronary stenosis compared with available systems, providing estimates of both FFR and iFR. The ReVEAL iFR study will investigate the predictive performance of the novel Angio-iFR software in CCS patients. Ultimately, based on its unique characteristics, the Angio-iFR system may contribute to improve adoption of functional coronary assessment and the workflow in the catheter laboratory.

Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: JACC Historical Breakthroughs in Perspective

Over the last 4 decades, percutaneous coronary intervention has evolved dramatically and is now an acceptable treatment option for patients with advanced coronary artery disease. However, trialists have struggled to establish the respective roles for percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery, especially in patients with multivessel disease and unprotected left-main stem coronary artery disease. Several pivotal trials and meta-analyses comparing these 2 revascularization strategies have enabled the relative merits of each technique to be established with regard to the type of ischemic syndrome, the coronary anatomy, and the patient's overall comorbidity. Precision medicine with individualized prognosis is emerging as an important method of selecting treatment. However, the never-ending advancement of technology, in conjunction with the emergence of novel pharmacological agents, will in the future continue to force us to reconsider the evolving question: "Which treatment strategy is better and for which patient?"