51
|
PRO-Bookmarking to Estimate Clinical Thresholds for Patient-reported Symptoms and Function. Med Care 2019; 57 Suppl 5 Suppl 1:S13-S17. [DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
52
|
Wang JHY, Gomez SL, Brown RL, Davis K, Allen L, Huang E, Chentsova Dutton Y, Schwartz MD. Factors associated with Chinese American and White cancer survivors' physical and psychological functioning. Health Psychol 2019; 38:455-465. [PMID: 31045429 PMCID: PMC6501801 DOI: 10.1037/hea0000666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine whether health-related stressors and resources are associated with physical function, depression, and anxiety in Chinese American and White breast cancer survivors. METHOD During 2011-2013, this cross-sectional study enrolled Chinese American and White women from California cancer registries diagnosed with Stage 0-III breast cancer between 2006 and 2012. Survivors completed a telephone survey assessing health-related factors including comorbidity, treatment-related symptoms, medical communication, perceived threat, use of coping, and social support resources. Outcomes were assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) short forms. Chinese were classified as low- or high-acculturated based on English proficiency, years in the United States, and interview language. Analyses were conducted using Tobit regression models. RESULTS Low-acculturated Chinese (n = 136) had worse physical functioning than Whites (n = 216), controlling for demographics, cancer stage, and time since diagnosis (β = -3.33, p = .01). This disparity was attenuated after adjusting for comorbidity and symptoms (β = -1.63, p = .18). Perceived threat, disengagement coping, and lack of social support were associated with poorer psychological outcomes, regardless of ethnicity. Although low-acculturated Chinese had lower scores on all health-related factors than Whites, the former reported significantly lower level of depression (β = -3.23) and anxiety (β = -5.8) after adjusting for covariates (both p < .05). High-acculturated Chinese (n = 84) did not differ from Whites except that the former had significantly lower anxiety. CONCLUSION Low-acculturated Chinese may benefit from interventions aimed to improve their physical problems. However, despite experiencing greater psychosocial stress, they reported better emotional functioning. Whether Chinese culture shapes this resiliency, or if it is a reporting bias will need further investigation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judy Huei-Yu Wang
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University
| | | | - Roger L Brown
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison
| | - Kimberly Davis
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University
| | | | - Ellen Huang
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University
| | | | - Marc D Schwartz
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Pilloni G, Shaw M, Feinberg C, Clayton A, Palmeri M, Datta A, Charvet LE. Long term at-home treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) improves symptoms of cerebellar ataxia: a case report. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2019; 16:41. [PMID: 30890162 PMCID: PMC6425598 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-019-0514-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2018] [Accepted: 03/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Progressive cerebellar ataxia is a neurodegenerative disorder without effective treatment options that seriously hinders quality of life. Previously, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been demonstrated to benefit cerebellar functions (including improved motor control, learning and emotional processing) in healthy individuals and patients with neurological disorders. While tDCS is an emerging therapy, multiple daily sessions are needed for optimal clinical benefit. This case study tests the symptomatic benefit of remotely supervised tDCS (RS-tDCS) for a patient with cerebellar ataxia. METHODS We report a case of a 71-year-old female patient with progressive cerebellar ataxia, who presented with unsteady gait and balance impairment, treated with tDCS. tDCS was administered using our RS-tDCS protocol and was completed daily in the patient's home (Monday - Friday) with the help of a trained study technician. tDCS was paired with 20 min of simultaneous cognitive training, followed by 20 min of physical exercises directed by a physical therapist. Stimulation consisted of 20 min of 2.5 mA direct current targeting the cerebellum via an anodal electrode and a cathodal electrode placed over the right shoulder. The patient completed baseline and treatment end visits with neurological, cognitive, and motor (Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 ft walk test and Timed Up and Go Test) assessments. RESULTS The patient successfully completed sixty tDCS sessions, 59 of which were administered remotely at the patient's home with the use of real time supervision as enabled by video conferencing. Mild improvement was observed in the patient's gait with a 7% improvement in walking speed, which she completed without a walking-aid at treatment end, which was in stark contrast to her baseline assessment. Improvements were also achieved in manual dexterity, with an increase in pegboard scores bilaterally compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS Results from this case report suggest that consecutively administered tDCS treatments paired with cognitive and physical exercise hold promise for improving balance, gait, and manual dexterity in patients with progressive ataxia. Remotely supervised tDCS provides home access to enable the administration over an extended period. Further controlled study in a large group of those with cerebellar ataxia is needed to replicate these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03049969 . Registered 10 February 2017- Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppina Pilloni
- Department of Neurology, New York University Langone Health, 10th floor, 222 East 41st Street, New York, NY, 10017, USA.,Department of Mechanical Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Michael Shaw
- Department of Neurology, New York University Langone Health, 10th floor, 222 East 41st Street, New York, NY, 10017, USA
| | - Charles Feinberg
- Department of Neurology, New York University Langone Health, 10th floor, 222 East 41st Street, New York, NY, 10017, USA
| | - Ashley Clayton
- Department of Neurology, New York University Langone Health, 10th floor, 222 East 41st Street, New York, NY, 10017, USA
| | - Maria Palmeri
- Department of Neurology, New York University Langone Health, 10th floor, 222 East 41st Street, New York, NY, 10017, USA
| | | | - Leigh E Charvet
- Department of Neurology, New York University Langone Health, 10th floor, 222 East 41st Street, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Bingham Iii CO, Gutierrez AK, Butanis A, Bykerk VP, Curtis JR, Leong A, Lyddiatt A, Nowell WB, Orbai AM, Bartlett SJ. PROMIS Fatigue short forms are reliable and valid in adults with rheumatoid arthritis. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2019; 3:14. [PMID: 30790155 PMCID: PMC6384289 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-019-0105-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2018] [Accepted: 02/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Fatigue is prevalent and impactful in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). There is no standardized measure for its assessment nor data concerning the performance of PROMIS-Fatigue short forms (SFs) in people with RA. We evaluated the construct validity of 4-, 7-, and 8-item PROMIS-Fatigue SFs in RA patients across the range of disease activity. Methods Adult RA patients were recruited from an online patient community and an observational cohort from three academic medical centers. Measures included PROMIS-Fatigue SFs, other PROMIS measures, and other patient reported outcomes including RAND-36 Vitality, Fatigue NRS, and patient global assessment of disease activity. Other measures from the observational cohort included 28-joint swollen and tender joints, physician global assessment, and the composite RA clinical disease activity index (CDAI). Results Two-hundred online participants and 348 participants from the observational cohort were included. PROMIS Fatigue SF scores spanned the measurement continuum and correlated highly with each other (r’s ≥ 0.91) and other fatigue measures (r’s ≥ 0.85). PROMIS-Fatigue SF scores were highly and inversely associated with Physical Function and Participation (r’s − 0.77 to − 0.78), and moderately-highly and positively correlated with pain, sleep disturbance, anxiety, and depression (r’s 0.60 to 0.75). PROMIS-Fatigue SF scores showed dose-response relationships across fatigue severity descriptors and CDAI categories. Conclusions These results provide robust evidence supporting the construct validity of the 4, 7, and 8-item PROMIS-Fatigue SFs. They capture fatigue across the spectrum of RA disease activity in diverse groups of individuals and should be considered for use as patient-centered assessments of disease control and treatment efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clifton O Bingham Iii
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Mason F Lord Center Tower, 5200 Eastern Ave #434A, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
| | - Anna Kristina Gutierrez
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Mason F Lord Tower, 5200 Eastern Avenue, Rm 4100, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA
| | - Alessandra Butanis
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Mason F Lord Tower, 5200 Eastern Avenue, Rm 4100, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA
| | - Vivian P Bykerk
- Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, 525 East 71st St, 7th floor, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Curtis
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Amye Leong
- Healthy Motivation, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Ana Maria Orbai
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Mason F Lord Tower, 5200 Eastern Avenue, Rm 4100, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA
| | - Susan J Bartlett
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Mason F Lord Tower, 5200 Eastern Avenue, Rm 4100, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.,Center for Health Outcomes Research, McGill University, 5252 de Maisonneuve West, #3D-57, Montreal, QC, H4A 3S5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Yu Q, Medeiros KL, Wu X, Jensen RE. Nonlinear Predictive Models for Multiple Mediation Analysis: With an Application to Explore Ethnic Disparities in Anxiety and Depression Among Cancer Survivors. PSYCHOMETRIKA 2018; 83:991-1006. [PMID: 29611093 PMCID: PMC6168435 DOI: 10.1007/s11336-018-9612-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2017] [Revised: 02/23/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Mediation analysis allows the examination of effects of a third variable (mediator/confounder) in the causal pathway between an exposure and an outcome. The general multiple mediation analysis method (MMA), proposed by Yu et al., improves traditional methods (e.g., estimation of natural and controlled direct effects) to enable consideration of multiple mediators/confounders simultaneously and the use of linear and nonlinear predictive models for estimating mediation/confounding effects. Previous studies find that compared with non-Hispanic cancer survivors, Hispanic survivors are more likely to endure anxiety and depression after cancer diagnoses. In this paper, we applied MMA on MY-Health study to identify mediators/confounders and quantify the indirect effect of each identified mediator/confounder in explaining ethnic disparities in anxiety and depression among cancer survivors who enrolled in the study. We considered a number of socio-demographic variables, tumor characteristics, and treatment factors as potential mediators/confounders and found that most of the ethnic differences in anxiety or depression between Hispanic and non-Hispanic white cancer survivors were explained by younger diagnosis age, lower education level, lower proportions of employment, less likely of being born in the USA, less insurance, and less social support among Hispanic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingzhao Yu
- Biostatistics Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 3rd Floor, 2020 Gravier Street, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
| | | | - Xiaocheng Wu
- Louisiana Tumor Registry, 2020 Gravier Street, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA
| | - Roxanne E Jensen
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Sikorskii A, Victorson D, O'Connor P, Hankin V, Safikhani A, Crane T, Badger T, Wyatt G. PROMIS and legacy measures compared in a supportive care intervention for breast cancer patients and caregivers: Experience from a randomized trial. Psychooncology 2018; 27:2265-2273. [PMID: 29956396 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2018] [Revised: 06/18/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Accurate and efficient measurement of patient-reported outcomes is key in cancer symptom management trials. The newer Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and previously developed measures of similar conceptual content (legacy) are available to measure symptoms and functioning. This report compares the performance of two sets of measures, PROMIS and legacy, in a recently completed trial of a supportive care intervention that enrolled breast cancer patients and their friend or family caregivers. METHODS Patient-caregiver dyads (N = 256) were randomized to either reflexology delivered by caregivers or usual care control. Post-intervention, PROMIS and legacy measures of symptoms and functioning were analyzed in relation to trial arm, while adjusting for baseline values. Responsiveness of the two sets of measures was assessed using effect sizes and P-values for the effect of trial arm on patients' and caregivers' symptom and functioning outcomes. RESULTS Similar conclusions about intervention effects were found using PROMIS and legacy measures for pain, fatigue, sleep, anxiety, physical, and social functioning. Different conclusions were obtained for patient and caregiver depression: legacy measures indicated the efficacy of reflexology, while PROMIS depression measure did not. CONCLUSION Evidence of similar responsiveness supports the use of either set of measures for symptoms and functioning in clinical and general populations. Differences between PROMIS and legacy measures of depression need to be considered when choosing instruments for use in trials of supportive care interventions and in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alla Sikorskii
- Department of Psychiatry, Department of Statistics and Probability, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - David Victorson
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
| | | | - Vered Hankin
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
| | | | - Tracy Crane
- College of Nursing, University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ, USA
| | - Terry Badger
- College of Nursing, University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ, USA
| | - Gwen Wyatt
- College of Nursing, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Carlozzi NE, Ianni PA, Tulsky DS, Brickell TA, Lange RT, French LM, Cella D, Kallen MA, Miner JA, Kratz AL. Understanding Health-Related Quality of Life in Caregivers of Civilians and Service Members/Veterans With Traumatic Brain Injury: Establishing the Reliability and Validity of PROMIS Fatigue and Sleep Disturbance Item Banks. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018; 100:S102-S109. [PMID: 29932884 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2018] [Revised: 04/20/2018] [Accepted: 05/25/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the reliability and validity of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures of sleep disturbance and fatigue in traumatic brain injury (TBI) caregivers and to determine the severity of fatigue and sleep disturbance in these caregivers. DESIGN Cross-sectional survey data collected through an online data capture platform. SETTING A total of 4 rehabilitation hospitals and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. PARTICIPANTS Caregivers (N=560) of civilians (n=344) and service member/veterans (SMVs) (n=216) with TBI. INTERVENTION Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES PROMIS sleep and fatigue measures administered as both computerized adaptive tests (CATs) and 4-item short forms (SFs). RESULTS For both samples, floor and ceiling effects for the PROMIS measures were low (<11%), internal consistency was very good (all α≥0.80), and test-retest reliability was acceptable (all r≥0.70 except for the fatigue CAT in the SMV sample r=0.63). Convergent validity was supported by moderate correlations between the PROMIS and related measures. Discriminant validity was supported by low correlations between PROMIS measures and measures of dissimilar constructs. PROMIS scores indicated significantly worse sleep and fatigue for those caring for someone with high levels versus low levels of impairment. CONCLUSIONS Findings support the reliability and validity of the PROMIS CAT and SF measures of sleep disturbance and fatigue in caregivers of civilians and SMVs with TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noelle E Carlozzi
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
| | - Phillip A Ianni
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - David S Tulsky
- Center for Assessment Research and Translation, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE
| | - Tracey A Brickell
- Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; National Intrepid Center of Excellence, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD
| | - Rael T Lange
- Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; National Intrepid Center of Excellence, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Louis M French
- Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; National Intrepid Center of Excellence, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Michael A Kallen
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Jennifer A Miner
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Anna L Kratz
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Coles T, Bennett AV, Tan X, Battaglini CL, Sanoff HK, Basch E, Jensen RE, Reeve BB. Relationship between sleep and exercise as colorectal cancer survivors transition off treatment. Support Care Cancer 2018; 26:2663-2673. [PMID: 29470704 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4110-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2017] [Accepted: 02/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between exercise and sleep disturbance in a sample of individuals diagnosed with stage I, II, and III colorectal cancer (CRC) as patients transitioned off first-line treatment. We also sought to identify heterogeneity in the relationship between sleep disturbance and exercise. METHODS Data were obtained from the MY-Health study, a community-based observational study of adults diagnosed with cancer. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) measures (e.g., PROMIS Sleep) were administered, and participants self-reported demographics, comorbidities, cancer treatment, and exercise. Regression mixture and multiple regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between sleep disturbance and exercise cross-sectionally at an average of 10 months after diagnosis, and the change in sleep disturbance over a 7-month period, from approximately 10 to 17 months post-diagnosis. RESULTS Patients whose exercise was categorized as likely at or above American College of Sports Medicine's guidelines did not report statistically better sleep quality compared to patients who were classified as not active. However, retirement (B = - 2.4), anxiety (B = 0.21), and fatigue (B = 0.24) had statistically significant relationships with sleep disturbance (p < 0.05). Increase in exercise was not significantly associated with a decrease in sleep disturbance. No statistical heterogeneity was revealed in the relationship between sleep and exercise. CONCLUSIONS Further prospective research using an objective measure of exercise is warranted to confirm or refute the nature of the relationship between exercise and sleep disturbance in individuals diagnosed with CRC transitioning off first-line treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Coles
- RTI-Health Solutions, 200 Park Offices Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
| | - Antonia V Bennett
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Department of Health Policy and Management, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Xianming Tan
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Claudio L Battaglini
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Hanna K Sanoff
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Ethan Basch
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Department of Health Policy and Management, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Roxanne E Jensen
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Bryce B Reeve
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Bakshi N, Ross D, Krishnamurti L. Presence of pain on three or more days of the week is associated with worse patient reported outcomes in adults with sickle cell disease. J Pain Res 2018; 11:313-318. [PMID: 29445298 PMCID: PMC5810514 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s150065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
While acute episodic pain is the hallmark of sickle cell disease (SCD), transition to chronic pain is a major cause of morbidity and impaired quality of life. One of the core diagnostic criteria used by Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations Innovations Opportunities and Networks-American Pain Society Pain Taxonomy (AAPT) to define chronic SCD pain is the presence of pain on a “majority of days” in the past 6 months in one or more locations. The frequency characteristic of “majority of days” is adapted from the criteria of 15 days or more per month, used to define chronic migraine, but there are inadequate data to support this cutoff in SCD. Using an existing dataset of adults with SCD who completed patient-reported outcomes of pain interference, physical functioning, anxiety, depression, and fatigue using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) patient-reported outcomes measures information system (PROMIS) short-form instruments, we examined the association of the presence of pain on 3 or more days per week with patient-reported outcomes of functioning. In unadjusted analyses, presence of pain on 3 or more days a week was associated with higher median PROMIS scores of pain interference, anxiety, and depression. Median PROMIS scores of fatigue and physical function were worse in women compared with men in unadjusted analyses. We did not find any difference in median PROMIS pain scores between adults aged ≤35 years compared with those aged ≥35 years. In linear regression models, after adjustment for age and sex, the presence of pain on 3 or more days a week was found to be associated with worse pain interference and anxiety. These data support the clinical relevance of the frequency characteristic of pain on a “majority of days” in the definition of chronic SCD pain, and provide the rationale for prospective studies to validate the clinical definition of chronic pain in SCD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nitya Bakshi
- Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology-BMT, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.,Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Diana Ross
- Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology-BMT, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lakshmanan Krishnamurti
- Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology-BMT, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.,Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Charvet LE, Dobbs B, Shaw MT, Bikson M, Datta A, Krupp LB. Remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of fatigue in multiple sclerosis: Results from a randomized, sham-controlled trial. Mult Scler 2017; 24:1760-1769. [PMID: 28937310 DOI: 10.1177/1352458517732842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fatigue is a common and debilitating feature of multiple sclerosis (MS) that remains without reliably effective treatment. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising option for fatigue reduction. We developed a telerehabilitation protocol that delivers tDCS to participants at home using specially designed equipment and real-time supervision (remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (RS-tDCS)). OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether tDCS can reduce fatigue in individuals with MS. METHODS Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex left anodal tDCS was administered using a RS-tDCS protocol, paired with 20 minutes of cognitive training. Here, two studies are considered. Study 1 delivered 10 open-label tDCS treatments (1.5 mA; n = 15) compared to a cognitive training only condition ( n = 20). Study 2 was a randomized trial of active (2.0 mA, n = 15) or sham ( n = 12) delivered for 20 sessions. Fatigue was assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Fatigue Short Form. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION In Study 1, there was modest fatigue reduction in the active group (-2.5 ± 7.4 vs -0.2 ± 5.3, p = 0.30, Cohen's d = -0.35). However, in Study 2 there was statistically significant reduction for the active group (-5.6 ± 8.9 vs 0.9 ± 1.9, p = 0.02, Cohen's d = -0.71). tDCS is a potential treatment for MS-related fatigue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leigh E Charvet
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bryan Dobbs
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael T Shaw
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City University of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Lauren B Krupp
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Hedrick TL, Harrigan AM, Thiele RH, Friel CM, Kozower BD, Stukenborg GJ. A pilot study of patient-centered outcome assessment using PROMIS for patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Support Care Cancer 2017; 25:3103-3112. [PMID: 28439726 PMCID: PMC5577058 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-017-3718-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2016] [Accepted: 04/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Few studies have assessed patient-reported outcomes following colorectal surgery. The absence of this information makes it difficult to inform patients about the near-term effects of surgery, beyond outcomes assessed by traditional clinical measures. This study was designed to provide information about the effects of colorectal surgery on physical, mental, and social well-being outcomes. Methods The NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Assessment Center was used to collect patient responses prior to surgery and at their routine postoperative visit. Four domains were selected based on patient consultation and clinical experience: depression, pain interference, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and interest in sexual activity. Multilevel random coefficient models were used to assess the change in scores during the follow-up period and to assess the statistical significance of differences in trends over time associated with key clinical measures. Results In total, 142 patients were consented, with 107 patients completing pre- and postoperative assessments (75%). Preoperative assessments were typically completed 1 month prior to surgery (mean 29.5 days before, SD = 19.7) and postoperative assessments 1 month after surgery (mean 30.7 days after, SD = 9.2), with a mean of 60.3 days between assessment dates. Patients demonstrated no statistically significant changes in scores for pain interference (−0.18 points, p = 0.80) or the ability to participate in social roles and activities (0.44 points, p = 0.55), but had significant decreases in depression scores between pre- and postoperative assessments (−1.6 points, p = 0.03) and near significant increases in scores for interest in sex (1.5 points, p = 0.06). Pain interference scores for patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly increased (3.5 points, p = 0.03). Scores for the interest in sex domain decreased (worsened) for patients with oncologic etiology (−3.7 points, p = 0.03). No other differences in score trends by patient characteristics were large enough to be statistically significant at the p < 0.05 threshold. Conclusion These data suggest that the majority of patients quickly return to baseline physical, mental, and social function following colorectal surgery. This information can be used preoperatively to counsel patients about the typical impact of colorectal surgery on quality of life. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00520-017-3718-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Traci L Hedrick
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
| | - Amy M Harrigan
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Robert H Thiele
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Charles M Friel
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Benjamin D Kozower
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - George J Stukenborg
- School of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, P.O. Box 800717, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0821, USA
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Jensen RE, Potosky AL, Moinpour CM, Lobo T, Cella D, Hahn EA, Thissen D, Smith AW, Ahn J, Luta G, Reeve BB. United States Population-Based Estimates of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Symptom and Functional Status Reference Values for Individuals With Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:1913-1920. [PMID: 28426375 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.71.4410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To estimate cancer population-based reference values in the United States for eight PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) domains by age and stage of disease. Patients and Methods For the Measuring Your Health (MY-Health) study, persons newly diagnosed with cancer (prostate, colorectal, non-small-cell lung, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, breast, uterine, or cervical) from 2010 to 2012 (N = 5,284) were recruited through the National Cancer Institute's SEER Program. Participants were mailed surveys 6 to 13 months after diagnosis. Raking by race/ethnicity, age, and stage generated weighted average PROMIS scores for pain interference, fatigue, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, physical function, ability to participate in social roles, and cognitive function. PROMIS measures are standardized to a T-score metric, with a score of 50 representing the general US population mean. Clinically meaningful differences were defined as a 3-point difference in scores. Results Several reference values (means) for patients with cancer were worse than the general United States population norms of 50. These include pain interference (52.4), fatigue (52.2), and physical function (44.1). Reference values were highest (ie, showed greatest symptom burden) in lung cancer (pain interference, 55.5; fatigue, 57.3; depression, 51.4) and cervical cancer (anxiety, 53.2; sleep disturbance, 53.4). Reference values for patients age 65 to 84 years reported lower sleep disturbance, anxiety, and depression, and better cognitive function than younger patients. Cancer reference values were poorer among those with advanced disease compared with patients with limited or no evidence of disease, specifically physical function (41.1 v 46.6, respectively), fatigue (55.8 v 50.2, respectively), and pain interference (55.2 v 50.9, respectively). Conclusion In a large, population-based sample of patients with recently diagnosed cancer, we observed symptom severity and functional deficits by age, stage, and cancer type consistent with the expected impact of cancer diagnosis and treatment. These United States cancer reference values can help facilitate interpretation of the PROMIS domain scores in research studies or in clinical applications that measure and evaluate the symptom and functional burden patients with cancer experience after initial treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxanne E Jensen
- Roxanne E. Jensen, Arnold L. Potosky, Tania Lobo, and George Luta, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University; Jaeil Ahn and George Luta, Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Carol M. Moinpour, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; David Cella and Elizabeth A. Hahn, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; David Thissen and Bryce B. Reeve, University of North Carolina; Bryce B. Reeve, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Ashley Wilder Smith, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Arnold L Potosky
- Roxanne E. Jensen, Arnold L. Potosky, Tania Lobo, and George Luta, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University; Jaeil Ahn and George Luta, Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Carol M. Moinpour, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; David Cella and Elizabeth A. Hahn, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; David Thissen and Bryce B. Reeve, University of North Carolina; Bryce B. Reeve, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Ashley Wilder Smith, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Carol M Moinpour
- Roxanne E. Jensen, Arnold L. Potosky, Tania Lobo, and George Luta, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University; Jaeil Ahn and George Luta, Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Carol M. Moinpour, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; David Cella and Elizabeth A. Hahn, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; David Thissen and Bryce B. Reeve, University of North Carolina; Bryce B. Reeve, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Ashley Wilder Smith, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Tania Lobo
- Roxanne E. Jensen, Arnold L. Potosky, Tania Lobo, and George Luta, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University; Jaeil Ahn and George Luta, Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Carol M. Moinpour, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; David Cella and Elizabeth A. Hahn, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; David Thissen and Bryce B. Reeve, University of North Carolina; Bryce B. Reeve, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Ashley Wilder Smith, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - David Cella
- Roxanne E. Jensen, Arnold L. Potosky, Tania Lobo, and George Luta, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University; Jaeil Ahn and George Luta, Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Carol M. Moinpour, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; David Cella and Elizabeth A. Hahn, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; David Thissen and Bryce B. Reeve, University of North Carolina; Bryce B. Reeve, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Ashley Wilder Smith, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Elizabeth A Hahn
- Roxanne E. Jensen, Arnold L. Potosky, Tania Lobo, and George Luta, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University; Jaeil Ahn and George Luta, Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Carol M. Moinpour, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; David Cella and Elizabeth A. Hahn, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; David Thissen and Bryce B. Reeve, University of North Carolina; Bryce B. Reeve, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Ashley Wilder Smith, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - David Thissen
- Roxanne E. Jensen, Arnold L. Potosky, Tania Lobo, and George Luta, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University; Jaeil Ahn and George Luta, Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Carol M. Moinpour, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; David Cella and Elizabeth A. Hahn, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; David Thissen and Bryce B. Reeve, University of North Carolina; Bryce B. Reeve, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Ashley Wilder Smith, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Ashley Wilder Smith
- Roxanne E. Jensen, Arnold L. Potosky, Tania Lobo, and George Luta, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University; Jaeil Ahn and George Luta, Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Carol M. Moinpour, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; David Cella and Elizabeth A. Hahn, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; David Thissen and Bryce B. Reeve, University of North Carolina; Bryce B. Reeve, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Ashley Wilder Smith, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Jaeil Ahn
- Roxanne E. Jensen, Arnold L. Potosky, Tania Lobo, and George Luta, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University; Jaeil Ahn and George Luta, Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Carol M. Moinpour, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; David Cella and Elizabeth A. Hahn, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; David Thissen and Bryce B. Reeve, University of North Carolina; Bryce B. Reeve, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Ashley Wilder Smith, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - George Luta
- Roxanne E. Jensen, Arnold L. Potosky, Tania Lobo, and George Luta, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University; Jaeil Ahn and George Luta, Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Carol M. Moinpour, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; David Cella and Elizabeth A. Hahn, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; David Thissen and Bryce B. Reeve, University of North Carolina; Bryce B. Reeve, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Ashley Wilder Smith, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Bryce B Reeve
- Roxanne E. Jensen, Arnold L. Potosky, Tania Lobo, and George Luta, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University; Jaeil Ahn and George Luta, Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Carol M. Moinpour, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; David Cella and Elizabeth A. Hahn, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; David Thissen and Bryce B. Reeve, University of North Carolina; Bryce B. Reeve, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Ashley Wilder Smith, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Atkinson TM, Stover AM, Storfer DF, Saracino RM, D'Agostino TA, Pergolizzi D, Matsoukas K, Li Y, Basch E. Patient-Reported Physical Function Measures in Cancer Clinical Trials. Epidemiol Rev 2017; 39:59-70. [PMID: 28453627 PMCID: PMC5858035 DOI: 10.1093/epirev/mxx008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2016] [Revised: 02/28/2017] [Accepted: 03/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly used to monitor treatment-related symptoms and physical function decrements in cancer clinical trials. As more patients enter survivorship, it is important to capture PRO physical function throughout trials to help restore pretreatment levels of function. We completed a systematic review of PRO physical function measures used in cancer clinical trials and evaluated their psychometric properties on the basis of guidelines from the US Food and Drug Administration. Five databases were searched through October 2015: PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Health and Psychosocial Instruments, and Cochrane. From an initial total of 10,233 articles, we identified 108 trials that captured PRO physical function. Within these trials, approximately 67% used the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire and 25% used the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36. Both the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire and Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 instruments generically satisfy most Food and Drug Administration requirements, although neither sought direct patient input as part of item development. The newer Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function short form may be a brief, viable alternative. Clinicians should carefully consider the psychometric properties of these measures when incorporating PRO instrumentation into clinical trial design to provide a more comprehensive understanding of patient function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas M Atkinson
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Angela M Stover
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Daniel F Storfer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Rebecca M Saracino
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Thomas A D'Agostino
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Denise Pergolizzi
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Konstantina Matsoukas
- Information Systems, Memorial Sloan Kettering Library, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yuelin Li
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ethan Basch
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|