Projection of jaw-muscle spindle afferents to the caudal brainstem in rats demonstrated using intracellular biotinamide

Neurotrophin-3 and trkC in muscle are non-essential for the development of mouse muscle spindles

Neurotrophin-3 (NT3) or TrkC null mutant mice were examined for the presence of muscle spindles. Muscles of mastication, but not limbs, contained spindles in newborn and adolescent mutants. The intramuscular distribution and morphological properties of spindles in mutant masticatory muscles were indistinguishable from those of wild-type spindles. Intrafusal fibers of NT3- or trkC-deficient spindles-expressed the slow-tonic isoform of myosin heavy chains, characteristic of wild-type spindles. Sensory nerve endings were observed in spindles of mutants by electron microscopy. Thus, NT3 or trkC, which is expressed in wild-type spindles, may serve functions other than those related to spindle assembly. Presumably, proprioceptive neurons innervating jaw muscles are dependent on factors other than NT3 for survival and maintenance.

Central connections of the nucleus mesencephalicus nervi trigemini in the mallard (Anas platyrhynchos L.)

BACKGROUND

In the mallard duck, functionally distinct groups of jaw muscles are each innervated by a different subnucleus of the main trigeminal (mV) or facial (mVII) motor nucleus. The other subnuclei of mV and mVII innervate several head muscles, including lingual muscles. The reticular premotor cells of the trigeminal and facial jaw motor subnuclei occupy different areas in the parvocellular reticular formation (RPc). The cell bodies of jaw muscle spindle afferents are situated in the mesencephalic nucleus (MesV). In the present study, the central connections of MesV with jaw motor subnuclei and their premotor areas are investigated.

METHODS

In a first series of experiments, horseradish peroxidase (HRP) injections were made in electrophysiologically identified trigeminal and facial subnuclei. In a second series of experiments, HRP was delivered iontophoretically at different parts of RPc. Anterograde tracing with tritiated leucine was used to confirm the central connections of MesV. Double labeling with fluorescent tracers was used to investigate whether MesV collaterals reach both the rostral and caudal parts of RPc.

RESULTS

MesV projects to only two of the five different subnuclei of the trigeminal motor nucleus. The subnuclei that receive spindle afferents innervate jaw adductor muscles (mV2) or pro- and retractors of the mandible (pterygoid muscles; mV1). The three other subnuclei innervate jaw-opener muscles or other head muscles. MesV fibers also project to the rostral part of the dorsolateral RPc (RPcdl), which serves as a premotor area for the motor subnuclei of adductor and pterygoid muscles. The intermediate part of RPcdl does not contain premotor cells of mV or mVII, and a clear projection of MesV to this area is absent. The caudal part of RPcdl projects to the mV and mVII subnuclei that innervate jaw-opener muscles. This part of RPc receives a projection from the same MesV cells as the rostral RPcdl. The MesV projection to RPc does not include premotor cells of mV and mVII in the ventromedial part of RPc (RPcvm).

CONCLUSIONS

Spindle afferents from jaw-closer muscles project only to mV subnuclei innervating jaw-closer muscles (mV1, mV2) and to a population of premotor cells in the rostral RPcdl that innervates these subnuclei. The mixed population of premotor cells in RPcvm, which innervates both jaw-opener and jaw-closer subnuclei, does not receive a MesV projection. However, a premotor area for jaw-opener subnuclei in the caudal part of RPcdl does receive MesV input and may serve as a relay through which proprioceptive information from jaw closer spindles can reach jaw opener muscles.

Primary- and secondary-like jaw-muscle spindle afferents have characteristic topographic distributions

Single jaw-muscle spindle afferent axons were characterized physiologically and intracellularly stained to determine whether particular physiological types of spindle afferent show distinctive morphologies. Microelectrodes filled with either horseradish peroxidase (HRP) or biotinamide (Neurobiotin) were advanced into the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus (Vme) in anesthetized rats. Intracellular recordings then were characterized by their response: to palpation of the jaw muscles; when pressure was applied to the teeth and during passive ramp and hold and sinusoidal jaw movement. Seventy-one afferents were characterized physiologically and injected with HRP; an additional 61 afferents were typed and injected with biotinamide. The response of 43 stained neurons was recorded in the presence of suxamethonium. The major projection areas of these afferents were the: trigeminal motor nucleus (Vmo); region dorsal to Vmo; reticular formation, spinal trigeminal nucleus, superior cerebellar peduncle and Vme. One afferent type was modulated strongly during stretching of the jaw-elevator muscles. Based on their high sensitivity during stretching of the jaw muscles and/or their silencing during the release phase of muscle stretch, these afferents were classified as primary-like spindle afferents. These afferents projected most strongly to Vmo. A second type of afferent was modulated only modestly during stretching of the jaw-elevator muscles. These tonic afferents were classified as secondary-like spindle afferents because of their low dynamic sensitivity during ramp muscle stretch and their continued discharge during the release phase of muscle stretch. Secondary-like afferents projected most strongly to the region dorsal to Vmo. Boutons (n = 3,834) from 11 afferents were studied in detail. Secondary-like afferents had statistically larger boutons within Vmo. In both secondary- and primary-like spindle afferents, only a small number of boutons were associated closely with the somata and proximal dendrites of trigeminal motoneurons. In these cases, however, two to five boutons appeared to contact individual motoneurons, implying multiple monosynaptic inputs to a selective subset of jaw-elevator motoneurons. Some "giant" boutons were present dorsal to Vmo and in Vme. These results demonstrate that dynamically sensitive and nondynamically sensitive jaw-elevator muscle spindle afferents project preferentially to different regions. Primary-like spindle afferents are capable of providing feedback related to the dynamic phases of muscle stretch and project most heavily to Vmo. Secondary-like spindle afferents can transmit a feedback signal associated with muscle length and project most strongly to the supratrigeminal region. Both types of afferent have projections caudal to Vmo that may serve longer latency jaw-muscle stretch reflexes and/or the projection of proprioceptive information to the thalamus and cerebellum.

Physiological and theoretical analysis of K+ currents controlling discharge in neonatal rat mesencephalic trigeminal neurons

Whole cell voltage- and current-clamp recordings were obtained from mesencephalic trigeminal sensory (Mes 5) neurons identified visually in thin brain stem slices of neonatal rats with the use of infrared video microscopy. These cells exhibited accommodation in spike discharge responses to depolarizing current injection protocols whose duration differed as a function of holding potential (-50 vs. -65 mV). Several spikes were elicited before the membrane response accommodated from -50 mV, whereas from -65 mV only single action potentials were evoked. In response to similar protocols, application of the K+ channel blocker 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) (50 microM to 2 mM) caused sustained repetitive spiking whereas tetraethylammonium (TEA) (10-30 mM) did not cause repetitive spiking. In voltage clamp, 4-AP application (100 microM) revealed a sustained outward current (I4-AP) that was active between -60 and -30 mV. I4-AP was responsible for suppressing sustained repetitive spiking behavior, producing accommodation under normal circumstances. TEA application in voltage clamp revealed a sustained outward current evoked positive to -40 mV. Two transient outward currents (TOCs) were identified by prepulse protocols typically used to characterize A-type currents: a 4-AP-insensitive fast TOC, and a slow TOC (ITOC-S) sensitive to 4-AP (> 500 microM). A Ca(2+)-dependent outward current that activated positive to -30 mV was also characterized. A mathematical model of a Mes 5 neuron was assembled from our voltage-clamp records to simulate the dynamic interaction of outward currents during membrane excitation. We conclude that in Mes 5 neurons, the 4-AP-sensitive currents ITOC-S and I4-AP determine the duration of spike trains. In particular, the noninactivating I4-AP determines whether cells exhibit sustained repetitive discharge or accommodate in response to depolarizing current. Neurotransmitter modulation of this current or modulation of the resting membrane potential could modify the output properties of Mes 5 neurons, and therefore the properties of these currents must be incorporated into our current understanding of how these cells contribute to shaping oral-motor pattern generation.

Peptidergic innervation of the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus in the cat

BACKGROUND

The trigeminal processing of proprioceptive information is unique and very little is known about the neurochemical organization of trigeminal primary afferent neurons which mediate the sensory aspects of proprioception. In studies using immunocytochemicalretrograde tracing techniques, some classical neurotramsitters mediating the afferent modulation of the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus (MTN) have been investigated. This paper summarizes our current understanding of the peptidergic innervation of the cat MTN.

METHODS

The distribution of immunoreactive substances was studied using specific antisera against 11 major neuropeptides. Light and electron microscopic peroxidase-antiperoxidase immunocytochemical staining techniques in colchicine-treated animals were used to clarify the distribution of peptide-identified fibers related to the MTN.

RESULTS

Immunoreactivity to any of the tested neuropeptides could not be detected in the MTN cell bodies. Numerous fibers containing various peptides such as substance P, bombesin, enkephalins, cholecystokinin, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, vasopressin, and neuropeptide Y were present in the nucleus, however. These thin positive fibers covered the neuronal surface of the MTN cell bodies and some of the immunoreactive varicosities appeared to be in close proximity to profiles of MTN neurons. Electron microscopic observations revealed that perisomatic fibers were in direct apposition to perikarya of unstained large cells and some of them made synaptic contacts with their cell bodies and dendrites.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results demonstrate that the MTN neurons receive dense basket-like innervation from peptidergic neurons on somata and processes and have supported earlier evidence that the MTN of the cat is under influence of peptidergic input. Results of this study provide further evidence that the neuropeptides examined may play an important role in the integration and transmission of trigeminal proprioceptive information. Most likely they may co-exist with a classical but hitherto unknown neurotransmitter(s), that is unique for this region and whose release can be modulated by peptides.

Morphological evidence for recurrent jaw-muscle spindle afferent feedback within the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus

Horseradish peroxidase was injected into the jaw-elevator muscles of rats. Jaw-muscle spindle afferent axons were then intracellularly stained with biotinamide. Eleven intracellularly stained somata were closely apposed by intracellularly labeled spindle afferent boutons. Spindle afferent boutons closely apposed another 10 mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus (Vme) perikarya labeled from the jaw muscles. These results indicate that an anatomical substrate exists for recurrent feedback between jaw-muscle spindle afferents within Vme.

Transneuronal transport of intracellularly injected biotinamide in primary afferent axons

Transneuronal transport of biotinamide was observed following intracellular injection of biotinamide into rat jaw-muscle spindle afferent axons. Microelectrodes were advanced into the mesencephalic nucleus of the trigeminal nerve where jaw-muscle spindle afferent axons were identified by their increased firing during stretching of the jaw-elevator muscles. Biotinamide (Neurobiotin) was then injected into individual axons and the animals were maintained under anesthesia for 2-6 h. The animals were then killed via an overdose of anesthetic and the brainstem was processed histochemically. Biotinamide-filled axon collaterals and terminals were readily visible in the trigeminal motor nucleus, the trigeminal sensory nuclei, and adjacent reticular formation. In addition to these intracellularly stained axons, two to five neurons per animal (total of 36 in eight rats) were observed with a homogeneous gray reaction product distributed throughout their somata, proximal, and secondary dendrites. These neurons ranged in size from small (8-20 mu m, n - 26) to medium-sized (<30 mu m, n = 10) and were closely apposed by numerous (up to 20) biotinamide-stained spindle afferent boutons. Most of these neurons (n = 22) were located in the dorsomedial portion of the spinal trigeminal subnucleus interpolaris (Vi) 2.5-4.5 mm caudal to the intra-axonal injection site. Electron microscopic analysis in two rats suggests that the transneuronal biotinamide labeling occurred predominantly through asymmetric, axodendritic synapses between biotinamide-filled axon terminals and Vi neuronal dendrites. Although recent in vitro studies have reported that biotinamide permeates through gap junctions, in this study we found no evidence of biotinamide traversing the gap junctions which exist between trigeminal mesencephalic nucleus (Vme) neuronal somata. These results demonstrate that biotinamide can occasionally be transneuronally transported presumably via synapses; further information is needed to explain the seemingly sporadic nature of this transport.