51
|
Koskinen J, Roslin T, Nyman T, Abrego N, Michell C, Vesterinen EJ. Finding flies in the mushroom soup: Host specificity of fungus-associated communities revisited with a novel molecular method. Mol Ecol 2018; 28:190-202. [PMID: 30040155 DOI: 10.1111/mec.14810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2018] [Revised: 06/15/2018] [Accepted: 06/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Fruiting bodies of fungi constitute an important resource for thousands of other taxa. The structure of these diverse assemblages has traditionally been studied with labour-intensive methods involving cultivation and morphology-based species identification, to which molecular information might offer convenient complements. To overcome challenges in DNA extraction and PCR associated with the complex chemical properties of fruiting bodies, we developed a pipeline applicable for extracting amplifiable total DNA from soft fungal samples of any size. Our protocol purifies DNA in two sequential steps: (a) initial salt-isopropanol extraction of all nucleic acids in the sample is followed by (b) an extra clean-up step using solid-phase reversible immobilization (SPRI) magnetic beads. The protocol proved highly efficient, with practically all of our samples-regardless of biomass or other properties-being successfully PCR-amplified using metabarcoding primers and subsequently sequenced. As a proof of concept, we apply our methods to address a topical ecological question: is host specificity a major characteristic of fungus-associated communities, that is, do different fungus species harbour different communities of associated organisms? Based on an analysis of 312 fungal fruiting bodies representing 10 species in five genera from three orders, we show that molecular methods are suitable for studying this rich natural microcosm. Comparing to previous knowledge based on rearing and morphology-based identifications, we find a species-rich assemblage characterized by a low degree of host specialization. Our method opens up new horizons for molecular analyses of fungus-associated interaction webs and communities. Fruiting bodies of fungi constitute an important resource for thousands of other taxa. The structure of these diverse assemblages has traditionally been studied with labour-intensive methods involving cultivation and morphology-based species identification, to which molecular information might offer convenient complements. To overcome challenges in DNA extraction and PCR associated with the complex chemical properties of fruiting bodies, we developed a pipeline applicable for extracting amplifiable total DNA from soft fungal samples of any size. Our protocol purifies DNA in two sequential steps: (a) initial salt-isopropanol extraction of all nucleic acids in the sample is followed by (b) an extra clean-up step using solid-phase reversible immobilization (SPRI) magnetic beads. The protocol proved highly efficient, with practically all of our samples-regardless of biomass or other properties-being successfully PCR-amplified using metabarcoding primers and subsequently sequenced. As a proof of concept, we apply our methods to address a topical ecological question: is host specificity a major characteristic of fungus-associated communities, that is, do different fungus species harbour different communities of associated organisms? Based on an analysis of 312 fungal fruiting bodies representing 10 species in five genera from three orders, we show that molecular methods are suitable for studying this rich natural microcosm. Comparing to previous knowledge based on rearing and morphology-based identifications, we find a species-rich assemblage characterized by a low degree of host specialization. Our method opens up new horizons for molecular analyses of fungus-associated interaction webs and communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janne Koskinen
- Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland.,Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tomas Roslin
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Tommi Nyman
- Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland
| | - Nerea Abrego
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Craig Michell
- Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland
| | - Eero J Vesterinen
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Biodiversity Unit, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
|
53
|
Roubinet E, Jonsson T, Malsher G, Staudacher K, Traugott M, Ekbom B, Jonsson M. High Redundancy as well as Complementary Prey Choice Characterize Generalist Predator Food Webs in Agroecosystems. Sci Rep 2018; 8:8054. [PMID: 29795226 PMCID: PMC5966386 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26191-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 05/04/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Food web structure influences ecosystem functioning and the strength and stability of associated ecosystem services. With their broad diet, generalist predators represent key nodes in the structure of many food webs and they contribute substantially to ecosystem services such as biological pest control. However, until recently it has been difficult to empirically assess food web structure with generalist predators. We utilized DNA-based molecular gut-content analyses to assess the prey use of a set of generalist invertebrate predator species common in temperate agricultural fields. We investigated the degree of specialization of predator-prey food webs at two key stages of the cropping season and analysed the link temperature of different trophic links, to identify non-random predation. We found a low level of specialization in our food webs, and identified warm and cool links which may result from active prey choice or avoidance. We also found a within-season variation in interaction strength between predators and aphid pests which differed among predator species. Our results show a high time-specific functional redundancy of the predator community, but also suggest temporally complementary prey choice due to within-season succession of some predator species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve Roubinet
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Tomas Jonsson
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.,Ecological Modelling group, School of Biosciences, Skövde University, Skövde, Sweden
| | - Gerard Malsher
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Karin Staudacher
- Mountain Agriculture Research Unit, Institute of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Michael Traugott
- Mountain Agriculture Research Unit, Institute of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Barbara Ekbom
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Mattias Jonsson
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Eitzinger B, Rall BC, Traugott M, Scheu S. Testing the validity of functional response models using molecular gut content analysis for prey choice in soil predators. OIKOS 2018. [DOI: 10.1111/oik.04885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bernhard Eitzinger
- J. F. Blumenbach Inst. of Zoology and Anthropology; Univ. of Göttingen; Untere Karspüle 2 DE-37073 Göttingen Germany
- Dept of Agricultural Sciences; Univ. of Helsinki; Helsinki Finland
| | - Björn C. Rall
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig; Leipzig Germany
- Inst. of Biodiversity, Friedrich Schiller Univ. Jena; Jena Germany
| | - Michael Traugott
- Mountain Agriculture Research Unit; Inst. of Ecology, Univ. of Innsbruck; Innsbruck Austria
| | - Stefan Scheu
- J. F. Blumenbach Inst. of Zoology and Anthropology; Univ. of Göttingen; Untere Karspüle 2 DE-37073 Göttingen Germany
- Centre of Biodiversity and Sustainable Land Use; Univ. of Göttingen; Göttingen Germany
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Penczykowski RM, Connolly BM, Barton BT. Winter is changing: Trophic interactions under altered snow regimes. FOOD WEBS 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fooweb.2017.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
56
|
Pellissier L, Albouy C, Bascompte J, Farwig N, Graham C, Loreau M, Maglianesi MA, Melián CJ, Pitteloud C, Roslin T, Rohr R, Saavedra S, Thuiller W, Woodward G, Zimmermann NE, Gravel D. Comparing species interaction networks along environmental gradients. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2017; 93:785-800. [PMID: 28941124 DOI: 10.1111/brv.12366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2017] [Revised: 08/17/2017] [Accepted: 08/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Knowledge of species composition and their interactions, in the form of interaction networks, is required to understand processes shaping their distribution over time and space. As such, comparing ecological networks along environmental gradients represents a promising new research avenue to understand the organization of life. Variation in the position and intensity of links within networks along environmental gradients may be driven by turnover in species composition, by variation in species abundances and by abiotic influences on species interactions. While investigating changes in species composition has a long tradition, so far only a limited number of studies have examined changes in species interactions between networks, often with differing approaches. Here, we review studies investigating variation in network structures along environmental gradients, highlighting how methodological decisions about standardization can influence their conclusions. Due to their complexity, variation among ecological networks is frequently studied using properties that summarize the distribution or topology of interactions such as number of links, connectance, or modularity. These properties can either be compared directly or using a procedure of standardization. While measures of network structure can be directly related to changes along environmental gradients, standardization is frequently used to facilitate interpretation of variation in network properties by controlling for some co-variables, or via null models. Null models allow comparing the deviation of empirical networks from random expectations and are expected to provide a more mechanistic understanding of the factors shaping ecological networks when they are coupled with functional traits. As an illustration, we compare approaches to quantify the role of trait matching in driving the structure of plant-hummingbird mutualistic networks, i.e. a direct comparison, standardized by null models and hypothesis-based metaweb. Overall, our analysis warns against a comparison of studies that rely on distinct forms of standardization, as they are likely to highlight different signals. Fostering a better understanding of the analytical tools available and the signal they detect will help produce deeper insights into how and why ecological networks vary along environmental gradients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loïc Pellissier
- Landscape Ecology, Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.,Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
| | - Camille Albouy
- Landscape Ecology, Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.,Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.,IFREMER, unité Ecologie et Modèles pour l'Halieutique, rue de l'Ile d'Yeu, BP21105, 44311, Nantes cedex 3, France
| | - Jordi Bascompte
- Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zürich, 8057, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Nina Farwig
- Conservation Ecology, Faculty of Biology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Str.8, D-35032, Marburg, Germany
| | - Catherine Graham
- Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
| | - Michel Loreau
- Centre for Biodiversity Theory and Modelling, Theoretical and Experimental Ecology Station, CNRS and Paul Sabatier University, 09200, Moulis, France
| | - Maria Alejandra Maglianesi
- Vicerrectoría de Investigación, Universidad Estatal a Distancia, 2050, San José, Costa Rica.,Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F) and Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 60325, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Carlos J Melián
- Department of Fish Ecology and Evolution, Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 6047, Kastanienbaum, Switzerland
| | - Camille Pitteloud
- Landscape Ecology, Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.,Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
| | - Tomas Roslin
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Rudolf Rohr
- Department of Biology - Ecology and Evolution, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Serguei Saavedra
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massashusets Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, 02139, MA, U.S.A
| | - Wilfried Thuiller
- University of Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, LECA (Laboratoire d'Écologie Alpine), F-38000, Grenoble, France
| | - Guy Woodward
- Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, U.K
| | - Niklaus E Zimmermann
- Landscape Ecology, Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.,Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
| | - Dominique Gravel
- Département de Biologie, Faculté des Sciences, Canada Research Chair in Integrative Ecology, Université de Sherbrooke, 2500, boulevard de l'Université, Sherbrooke, J1K 2R1, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
The detritus-based microbial-invertebrate food web contributes disproportionately to carbon and nitrogen cycling in the Arctic. Polar Biol 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s00300-017-2201-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
58
|
Kaunisto KM, Roslin T, Sääksjärvi IE, Vesterinen EJ. Pellets of proof: First glimpse of the dietary composition of adult odonates as revealed by metabarcoding of feces. Ecol Evol 2017; 7:8588-8598. [PMID: 29075474 PMCID: PMC5648679 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2017] [Revised: 08/02/2017] [Accepted: 08/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent advances in molecular techniques allow us to resolve the diet of unstudied taxa. Odonates are potentially important top-down regulators of many insects. Yet, to date, our knowledge of odonate prey use is based mainly on limited observations of odonates catching or eating their prey. In this study, we examine the potential use of metabarcoding in establishing the diet of three adult odonate species (Lestes sponsa, Enallagma cyathigerum, and Sympetrum danae) at a site in southwestern Finland. To this purpose, we compared three different methods for extracting DNA from fecal samples: the Macherey-Nagel Nucleospin XS kit, a traditional salt extraction, and the Zymo Research Fecal Microprep kit. From these extracts, we amplified group-specific mitochondrial markers (COI and 16S rRNA) from altogether 72 odonate individuals, and compared them to comprehensive reference libraries. The three odonate species show major overlap in diet, with no significant differences between individuals of different size and/or gender, reflecting opportunistic foraging of adult odonates. Of a total of 41 different prey species detected, the most frequently consumed ones were Diptera, with additional records of six other orders. Based on our data, the best DNA extraction method is the traditional salt extraction, as it provides the most information on prey content while also being the most economical. To our knowledge, this is the first study to resolve the species-level diet of adult odonates. Armed with the appropriate methodological caveats, we are ready to examine the ecological role of odonates in both terrestrial and aquatic food webs, and in transferring subsidies between these two realms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kari M Kaunisto
- Zoological Museum Biodiversity Unit University of Turku Turku Finland
| | - Tomas Roslin
- Department of Ecology Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden.,Department of Agricultural Sciences University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
| | | | - Eero J Vesterinen
- Zoological Museum Biodiversity Unit University of Turku Turku Finland.,Department of Agricultural Sciences University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Life Cycle Impact Assessment in the Arctic: Challenges and Research Needs. SUSTAINABILITY 2017. [DOI: 10.3390/su9091605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
60
|
Birkhofer K, Bylund H, Dalin P, Ferlian O, Gagic V, Hambäck PA, Klapwijk M, Mestre L, Roubinet E, Schroeder M, Stenberg JA, Porcel M, Björkman C, Jonsson M. Methods to identify the prey of invertebrate predators in terrestrial field studies. Ecol Evol 2017; 7:1942-1953. [PMID: 28331601 PMCID: PMC5355183 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2016] [Revised: 12/29/2016] [Accepted: 01/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Predation is an interaction during which an organism kills and feeds on another organism. Past and current interest in studying predation in terrestrial habitats has yielded a number of methods to assess invertebrate predation events in terrestrial ecosystems. We provide a decision tree to select appropriate methods for individual studies. For each method, we then present a short introduction, key examples for applications, advantages and disadvantages, and an outlook to future refinements. Video and, to a lesser extent, live observations are recommended in studies that address behavioral aspects of predator–prey interactions or focus on per capita predation rates. Cage studies are only appropriate for small predator species, but often suffer from a bias via cage effects. The use of prey baits or analyses of prey remains are cheaper than other methods and have the potential to provide per capita predation estimates. These advantages often come at the cost of low taxonomic specificity. Molecular methods provide reliable estimates at a fine level of taxonomic resolution and are free of observer bias for predator species of any size. However, the current PCR‐based methods lack the ability to estimate predation rates for individual predators and are more expensive than other methods. Molecular and stable isotope analyses are best suited to address systems that include a range of predator and prey species. Our review of methods strongly suggests that while in many cases individual methods are sufficient to study specific questions, combinations of methods hold a high potential to provide more holistic insights into predation events. This review presents an overview of methods to researchers that are new to the field or to particular aspects of predation ecology and provides recommendations toward the subset of suitable methods to identify the prey of invertebrate predators in terrestrial field research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus Birkhofer
- Department of Biology, Biodiversity and Conservation Science Lund University Lund Sweden; Chair of Ecology Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg Germany
| | - Helena Bylund
- Department of Ecology Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden
| | - Peter Dalin
- Department of Ecology Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden
| | - Olga Ferlian
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig Leipzig Germany; Institute of Biology Leipzig University Leipzig Germany
| | - Vesna Gagic
- Department of Ecology Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden; CSIRO Brisbane QLD Australia
| | - Peter A Hambäck
- Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden
| | - Maartje Klapwijk
- Department of Ecology Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden
| | - Laia Mestre
- Department of Ecology Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden; Ecosystem Analysis Institute for Environmental Sciences University of Koblenz-Landau Landau Germany
| | - Eve Roubinet
- Department of Ecology Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden
| | - Martin Schroeder
- Department of Ecology Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden
| | - Johan A Stenberg
- Department of Plant Protection Biology Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Alnarp Sweden
| | - Mario Porcel
- Department of Plant Protection Biology Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Alnarp Sweden
| | - Christer Björkman
- Department of Ecology Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden
| | - Mattias Jonsson
- Department of Ecology Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Schmidt NM, Hardwick B, Gilg O, Høye TT, Krogh PH, Meltofte H, Michelsen A, Mosbacher JB, Raundrup K, Reneerkens J, Stewart L, Wirta H, Roslin T. Interaction webs in arctic ecosystems: Determinants of arctic change? AMBIO 2017; 46:12-25. [PMID: 28116681 PMCID: PMC5258656 DOI: 10.1007/s13280-016-0862-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
How species interact modulate their dynamics, their response to environmental change, and ultimately the functioning and stability of entire communities. Work conducted at Zackenberg, Northeast Greenland, has changed our view on how networks of arctic biotic interactions are structured, how they vary in time, and how they are changing with current environmental change: firstly, the high arctic interaction webs are much more complex than previously envisaged, and with a structure mainly dictated by its arthropod component. Secondly, the dynamics of species within these webs reflect changes in environmental conditions. Thirdly, biotic interactions within a trophic level may affect other trophic levels, in some cases ultimately affecting land-atmosphere feedbacks. Finally, differential responses to environmental change may decouple interacting species. These insights form Zackenberg emphasize that the combination of long-term, ecosystem-based monitoring, and targeted research projects offers the most fruitful basis for understanding and predicting the future of arctic ecosystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niels M. Schmidt
- Department of Bioscience, Arctic Research Centre, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Bess Hardwick
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O.Box 27, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Olivier Gilg
- GREA, 16 rue de Vernot, 21440 Francheville, France
| | - Toke T. Høye
- Department of Bioscience, Arctic Research Centre, Aarhus University, Grenåvej 14, 8410 Rønde, Denmark
| | - Paul Henning Krogh
- Department of Bioscience, Soil Fauna Ecology and Ecotoxicology and Arctic Research Centre, Aarhus University, Vejlsøvej 25, 8600 Silkeborg, Denmark
| | - Hans Meltofte
- Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Anders Michelsen
- Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jesper B. Mosbacher
- Department of Bioscience, Arctic Research Centre, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Katrine Raundrup
- Greenland Institute of Natural Resources, Kivioq 2, P.O. Box 570, 3900 Nuuk, Greenland
| | - Jeroen Reneerkens
- Animal Ecology Group, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Lærke Stewart
- Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Helena Wirta
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O.Box 27, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tomas Roslin
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7044, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Jouta J, Dietz MW, Reneerkens J, Piersma T, Rakhimberdiev E, Hallgrímsson GT, Pen I. Ecological forensics: using single point stable isotope values to infer seasonal schedules of animals after two diet switches. Methods Ecol Evol 2016. [DOI: 10.1111/2041-210x.12695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jeltje Jouta
- Department of Coastal Systems and Utrecht University NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research P.O. Box 59, 1790 AB Den Burg Texel The Netherlands
- Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES) University of Groningen P.O. Box 11103 9700 CC Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Maurine W. Dietz
- Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES) University of Groningen P.O. Box 11103 9700 CC Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Reneerkens
- Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES) University of Groningen P.O. Box 11103 9700 CC Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Theunis Piersma
- Department of Coastal Systems and Utrecht University NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research P.O. Box 59, 1790 AB Den Burg Texel The Netherlands
- Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES) University of Groningen P.O. Box 11103 9700 CC Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Eldar Rakhimberdiev
- Department of Coastal Systems and Utrecht University NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research P.O. Box 59, 1790 AB Den Burg Texel The Netherlands
- Department of Vertebrate Zoology Lomonosov Moscow State University 119991 Moscow Russia
| | | | - Ido Pen
- Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES) University of Groningen P.O. Box 11103 9700 CC Groningen The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Pohjoismäki JLO, Kahanpää J, Mutanen M. DNA Barcodes for the Northern European Tachinid Flies (Diptera: Tachinidae). PLoS One 2016; 11:e0164933. [PMID: 27814365 PMCID: PMC5096672 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2016] [Accepted: 10/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
This data release provides COI barcodes for 366 species of parasitic flies (Diptera: Tachinidae), enabling the DNA based identification of the majority of northern European species and a large proportion of Palearctic genera, regardless of the developmental stage. The data will provide a tool for taxonomists and ecologists studying this ecologically important but challenging parasitoid family. A comparison of minimum distances between the nearest neighbors revealed the mean divergence of 5.52% that is approximately the same as observed earlier with comparable sampling in Lepidoptera, but clearly less than in Coleoptera. Full barcode-sharing was observed between 13 species pairs or triplets, equaling to 7.36% of all species. Delimitation based on Barcode Index Number (BIN) system was compared with traditional classification of species and interesting cases of possible species oversplits and cryptic diversity are discussed. Overall, DNA barcodes are effective in separating tachinid species and provide novel insight into the taxonomy of several genera.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaakko L. O. Pohjoismäki
- University of Eastern Finland, Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, P.O.Box 111, 80101, Joensuu, Finland
| | - Jere Kahanpää
- University of Helsinki, Finnish Museum of Natural History, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Marko Mutanen
- Department of Genetics and Physiology, PO. Box 3000, 90014 University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Hambäck PA, Weingartner E, Dalén L, Wirta H, Roslin T. Spatial subsidies in spider diets vary with shoreline structure: Complementary evidence from molecular diet analysis and stable isotopes. Ecol Evol 2016; 6:8431-8439. [PMID: 28031795 PMCID: PMC5167037 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2016] [Revised: 09/08/2016] [Accepted: 09/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Inflow of matter and organisms may strongly affect the local density and diversity of organisms. This effect is particularly evident on shores where organisms with aquatic larval stages enter the terrestrial food web. The identities of such trophic links are not easily estimated as spiders, a dominant group of shoreline predator, have external digestion. We compared trophic links and the prey diversity of spiders on different shore types along the Baltic Sea: on open shores and on shores with a reed belt bordering the water. A priori, we hypothesized that the physical structure of the shoreline reduces the flow between ecosystem and the subsidies across the sea-land interface. To circumvent the lack of morphologically detectable remains of spider prey, we used a combination of stable isotope and molecular gut content analyses. The two tools used for diet analysis revealed complementary information on spider diets. The stable isotope analysis indicated that spiders on open shores had a marine signal of carbon isotopes, while spiders on reedy shores had a terrestrial signal. The molecular analysis revealed a diverse array of dipteran and lepidopteran prey, where spiders on open and reedy shores shared a similar diet with a comparable proportion of chironomids, the larvae of which live in the marine system. Comparing the methods suggests that differences in isotope composition of the two spider groups occurred because of differences in the chironomid diets: as larvae, chironomids of reedy shores likely fed on terrestrial detritus and acquired a terrestrial isotope signature, while chironomids of open shores utilized an algal diet and acquired a marine isotope signature. Our results illustrate how different methods of diet reconstruction may shed light on complementary aspects of nutrient transfer. Overall, they reveal that reed belts can reduce connectivity between habitats, but also function as a source of food for predators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter A Hambäck
- Department of Ecology, Environment and Plants Sciences Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden
| | - Elisabeth Weingartner
- Department of Ecology, Environment and Plants Sciences Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden
| | - Love Dalén
- Department of Bioinformatics and Genetics Swedish Museum of Natural History Stockholm Sweden
| | - Helena Wirta
- Department of Agricultural Sciences University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
| | - Tomas Roslin
- Department of Agricultural Sciences University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland; Department of Ecology Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Reneerkens J, Schmidt NM, Gilg O, Hansen J, Hansen LH, Moreau J, Piersma T. Effects of food abundance and early clutch predation on reproductive timing in a high Arctic shorebird exposed to advancements in arthropod abundance. Ecol Evol 2016; 6:7375-7386. [PMID: 28725405 PMCID: PMC5513252 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2016] [Revised: 07/05/2016] [Accepted: 07/15/2016] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Climate change may influence the phenology of organisms unequally across trophic levels and thus lead to phenological mismatches between predators and prey. In cases where prey availability peaks before reproducing predators reach maximal prey demand, any negative fitness consequences would selectively favor resynchronization by earlier starts of the reproductive activities of the predators. At a study site in northeast Greenland, over a period of 17 years, the median emergence of the invertebrate prey of Sanderling Calidris alba advanced with 1.27 days per year. Yet, over the same period Sanderling did not advance hatching date. Thus, Sanderlings increasingly hatched after their prey was maximally abundant. Surprisingly, the phenological mismatches did not affect chick growth, but the interaction of the annual width and height of the peak in food abundance did. Chicks grew especially better in years when the food peak was broad. Sanderling clutches were most likely to be depredated early in the season, which should delay reproduction. We propose that high early clutch predation may favor a later reproductive timing. Additionally, our data suggest that in most years food was still abundant after the median date of emergence, which may explain why Sanderlings did not advance breeding along with the advances in arthropod phenology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeroen Reneerkens
- Conservation Ecology GroupGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES)University of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
- Arctic Research CentreDepartment of BioscienceAarhus UniversityRoskildeDenmark
| | | | - Olivier Gilg
- Laboratoire BiogéosciencesUniversité de BourgogneDijonFrance
- Groupe de Recherche en Ecologie Arctique (GREA)FranchevilleFrance
| | - Jannik Hansen
- Arctic Research CentreDepartment of BioscienceAarhus UniversityRoskildeDenmark
| | - Lars Holst Hansen
- Arctic Research CentreDepartment of BioscienceAarhus UniversityRoskildeDenmark
| | - Jérôme Moreau
- Laboratoire BiogéosciencesUniversité de BourgogneDijonFrance
- Groupe de Recherche en Ecologie Arctique (GREA)FranchevilleFrance
| | - Theunis Piersma
- Conservation Ecology GroupGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES)University of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
- NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea ResearchDepartment of Coastal Systems and Utrecht UniversityDen BurgTexelThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Birkemoe T, Bergmann S, Hasle TE, Klanderud K. Experimental warming increases herbivory by leaf-chewing insects in an alpine plant community. Ecol Evol 2016; 6:6955-6962. [PMID: 28725372 PMCID: PMC5513215 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2016] [Revised: 07/01/2016] [Accepted: 08/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Climate warming is predicted to affect species and trophic interactions worldwide, and alpine ecosystems are expected to be especially sensitive to changes. In this study, we used two ongoing climate warming (open-top chambers) experiments at Finse, southern Norway, to examine whether warming had an effect on herbivory by leaf-chewing insects in an alpine Dryas heath community. We recorded feeding marks on the most common vascular plant species in warmed and control plots at two experimental sites at different elevations and carried out a brief inventory of insect herbivores. Experimental warming increased herbivory on Dryas octopetala and Bistorta vivipara. Dryas octopetala also experienced increased herbivory at the lower and warmer site, indicating an overall positive effect of warming, whereas B. vivipara experienced an increased herbivory at the colder and higher site indicating a mixed effect of warming. The Lepidoptera Zygaena exulans and Sympistis nigrita were the two most common leaf-chewing insects in the Dryas heath. Based on the observed patterns of herbivory, the insects life cycles and feeding preferences, we argue that Z. exulans is the most important herbivore on B. vivipara, and S. nigrita the most important herbivore on D. octopetala. We conclude that if the degree of insect herbivory increases in a warmer world, as suggested by this study and others, complex interactions between plants, insects, and site-specific conditions make it hard to predict overall effects on plant communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tone Birkemoe
- Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management Norwegian University of Life Sciences P.O. Box 5003 N-1432 Ås Norway
| | - Saskia Bergmann
- Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management Norwegian University of Life Sciences P.O. Box 5003 N-1432 Ås Norway
| | - Toril E Hasle
- Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management Norwegian University of Life Sciences P.O. Box 5003 N-1432 Ås Norway
| | - Kari Klanderud
- Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management Norwegian University of Life Sciences P.O. Box 5003 N-1432 Ås Norway
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Roslin T, Majaneva S. The use of DNA barcodes in food web construction-terrestrial and aquatic ecologists unite! Genome 2016; 59:603-28. [PMID: 27484156 DOI: 10.1139/gen-2015-0229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
By depicting who eats whom, food webs offer descriptions of how groupings in nature (typically species or populations) are linked to each other. For asking questions on how food webs are built and work, we need descriptions of food webs at different levels of resolution. DNA techniques provide opportunities for highly resolved webs. In this paper, we offer an exposé of how DNA-based techniques, and DNA barcodes in particular, have recently been used to construct food web structure in both terrestrial and aquatic systems. We highlight how such techniques can be applied to simultaneously improve the taxonomic resolution of the nodes of the web (i.e., the species), and the links between them (i.e., who eats whom). We end by proposing how DNA barcodes and DNA information may allow new approaches to the construction of larger interaction webs, and overcome some hurdles to achieving adequate sample size. Most importantly, we propose that the joint adoption and development of these techniques may serve to unite approaches to food web studies in aquatic and terrestrial systems-revealing the extent to which food webs in these environments are structured similarly to or differently from each other, and how they are linked by dispersal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomas Roslin
- a Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7044, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.,b Spatial Foodweb Ecology Group, Department of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 27, (Latokartanonkaari 5), FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sanna Majaneva
- c Centre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial model Systems (EEMiS), Department of Biology and Environmental Science, Linnaeus University, 39182 Kalmar, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
van Nouhuys S. Diversity, population structure, and individual behaviour of parasitoids as seen using molecular markers. CURRENT OPINION IN INSECT SCIENCE 2016; 14:94-99. [PMID: 27436653 DOI: 10.1016/j.cois.2016.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2015] [Revised: 02/06/2016] [Accepted: 02/08/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Parasitoids have long been models for host-parasite interactions, and are important in biological control. Neutral molecular markers have become increasingly accessible tools, revealing previously unknown parasitoid diversity. Thus, insect communities are now seen as more speciose. They have also been found to be more complex, based on trophic links detected using bits of parasitoid DNA in hosts, and host DNA in adult parasitoids. At the population level molecular markers are used to determine the influence of factors such as host dynamics on parasitoid population structure. Finally, at the individual level, they are used to identify movement of individuals. Overall molecular markers greatly increase the value of parasitoid samples collected, for both basic and applied research, at all levels of study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saskya van Nouhuys
- Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, PO box 65, Helsinki 00014, Finland; Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Comstock Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Vesterinen EJ, Ruokolainen L, Wahlberg N, Peña C, Roslin T, Laine VN, Vasko V, Sääksjärvi IE, Norrdahl K, Lilley TM. What you need is what you eat? Prey selection by the batMyotis daubentonii. Mol Ecol 2016; 25:1581-94. [DOI: 10.1111/mec.13564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2015] [Revised: 01/08/2016] [Accepted: 01/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Eero J. Vesterinen
- Department of Biology; University of Turku; Vesilinnantie 1 FI-20014 Turku Finland
- Spatial Foodweb Ecology Group; Department of Agricultural Sciences; University of Helsinki; Latokartanonkaari 5 FI-00014 Helsinki Finland
| | - Lasse Ruokolainen
- Department of Biosciences; University of Helsinki; Viikinkaari 1 FI-00014 Helsinki Finland
| | - Niklas Wahlberg
- Department of Biology; University of Turku; Vesilinnantie 1 FI-20014 Turku Finland
- Department of Biology; Lund University; Sölvegatan 35 223 62 Lund Sweden
| | - Carlos Peña
- Department of Biology; University of Turku; Vesilinnantie 1 FI-20014 Turku Finland
| | - Tomas Roslin
- Spatial Foodweb Ecology Group; Department of Agricultural Sciences; University of Helsinki; Latokartanonkaari 5 FI-00014 Helsinki Finland
- Department of Ecology; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; Box 7044 750 07 Uppsala Sweden
| | - Veronika N. Laine
- Department of Animal Ecology; Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW); PO Box 50 6700AB Wageningen The Netherlands
| | - Ville Vasko
- Department of Biology; University of Turku; Vesilinnantie 1 FI-20014 Turku Finland
| | - Ilari E. Sääksjärvi
- Department of Biology; University of Turku; Vesilinnantie 1 FI-20014 Turku Finland
| | - Kai Norrdahl
- Department of Biology; University of Turku; Vesilinnantie 1 FI-20014 Turku Finland
| | - Thomas M. Lilley
- Department of Biology; University of Turku; Vesilinnantie 1 FI-20014 Turku Finland
- Biology Department; Bucknell University; 1 Dent Drive Lewisburg PA 17837 USA
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Wirta H, Várkonyi G, Rasmussen C, Kaartinen R, Schmidt NM, Hebert PDN, Barták M, Blagoev G, Disney H, Ertl S, Gjelstrup P, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Huldén L, Ilmonen J, Jakovlev J, Jaschhof M, Kahanpää J, Kankaanpää T, Krogh PH, Labbee R, Lettner C, Michelsen V, Nielsen SA, Nielsen TR, Paasivirta L, Pedersen S, Pohjoismäki J, Salmela J, Vilkamaa P, Väre H, von Tschirnhaus M, Roslin T. Establishing a community-wide DNA barcode library as a new tool for arctic research. Mol Ecol Resour 2015; 16:809-22. [PMID: 26602739 DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2015] [Revised: 11/09/2015] [Accepted: 11/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
DNA sequences offer powerful tools for describing the members and interactions of natural communities. In this study, we establish the to-date most comprehensive library of DNA barcodes for a terrestrial site, including all known macroscopic animals and vascular plants of an intensively studied area of the High Arctic, the Zackenberg Valley in Northeast Greenland. To demonstrate its utility, we apply the library to identify nearly 20 000 arthropod individuals from two Malaise traps, each operated for two summers. Drawing on this material, we estimate the coverage of previous morphology-based species inventories, derive a snapshot of faunal turnover in space and time and describe the abundance and phenology of species in the rapidly changing arctic environment. Overall, 403 terrestrial animal and 160 vascular plant species were recorded by morphology-based techniques. DNA barcodes (CO1) offered high resolution in discriminating among the local animal taxa, with 92% of morphologically distinguishable taxa assigned to unique Barcode Index Numbers (BINs) and 93% to monophyletic clusters. For vascular plants, resolution was lower, with 54% of species forming monophyletic clusters based on barcode regions rbcLa and ITS2. Malaise catches revealed 122 BINs not detected by previous sampling and DNA barcoding. The insect community was dominated by a few highly abundant taxa. Even closely related taxa differed in phenology, emphasizing the need for species-level resolution when describing ongoing shifts in arctic communities and ecosystems. The DNA barcode library now established for Zackenberg offers new scope for such explorations, and for the detailed dissection of interspecific interactions throughout the community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Wirta
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, Latokartanonkaari 5, 00790, Helsinki, Finland
| | - G Várkonyi
- Finnish Environment Institute, Natural Environment Centre, Friendship Park Research Centre, Lentiirantie 342B, 88900, Kuhmo, Finland
| | - C Rasmussen
- Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114, DK-8000, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - R Kaartinen
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7044, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - N M Schmidt
- Arctic Research Centre, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, DK-4000, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - P D N Hebert
- Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - M Barták
- Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, 165 21, Praha 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic
| | - G Blagoev
- Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - H Disney
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK
| | - S Ertl
- Division of Conservation Biology, Vegetation Ecology and Landscape Ecology, Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030, Vienna, Austria
| | - P Gjelstrup
- Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Vejlsøvej 25, Silkeborg, DK-8600, Denmark
| | - D J Gwiazdowicz
- Department of Forest Pathology, University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 71c, Poznan, 60625, Poland
| | - L Huldén
- Finnish Museum of Natural History, Zoology Unit, University of Helsinki, Pohjoinen Rautatiekatu 13, 00100, Helsinki, Finland
| | - J Ilmonen
- Metsähallitus, Parks & Wildlife Finland, PO Box 94, 01301, Vantaa, Finland
| | - J Jakovlev
- Finnish Environment Institute, Mechelininkatu 34A, 00250, Helsinki, Finland
| | - M Jaschhof
- Station Linné, Ölands Skogsby 161, 38693, Färjestaden, Sweden
| | - J Kahanpää
- Finnish Museum of Natural History, Zoology Unit, University of Helsinki, Pohjoinen Rautatiekatu 13, 00100, Helsinki, Finland
| | - T Kankaanpää
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, Latokartanonkaari 5, 00790, Helsinki, Finland
| | - P H Krogh
- Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Vejlsøvej 25, Silkeborg, DK-8600, Denmark
| | - R Labbee
- Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - C Lettner
- Division of Conservation Biology, Vegetation Ecology and Landscape Ecology, Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030, Vienna, Austria
| | - V Michelsen
- Zoological Museum of the University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - S A Nielsen
- Department of Environmental, Social and Spatial Change, Roskilde University, Universitetsvej 1, PO Box 260, DK-4000, Roskilde, Denmark
| | | | | | - S Pedersen
- Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - J Pohjoismäki
- Department of Biology, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 11, 80101, Joensuu, Finland
| | - J Salmela
- Metsähallitus, Ounasjoentie 6, 96101, Rovaniemi, Finland
| | - P Vilkamaa
- Finnish Museum of Natural History, Zoology Unit, University of Helsinki, Pohjoinen Rautatiekatu 13, 00100, Helsinki, Finland
| | - H Väre
- Finnish Museum of Natural History, Botany Unit, University of Helsinki, Unioninkatu 44, 00140, Helsinki, Finland
| | - M von Tschirnhaus
- Fakultät Biologie, Universität Bielefeld, Universitätsstrasse 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - T Roslin
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, Latokartanonkaari 5, 00790, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7044, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Telfer AC, Young MR, Quinn J, Perez K, Sobel CN, Sones JE, Levesque-Beaudin V, Derbyshire R, Fernandez-Triana J, Rougerie R, Thevanayagam A, Boskovic A, Borisenko AV, Cadel A, Brown A, Pages A, Castillo AH, Nicolai A, Glenn Mockford BM, Bukowski B, Wilson B, Trojahn B, Lacroix CA, Brimblecombe C, Hay C, Ho C, Steinke C, Warne CP, Garrido Cortes C, Engelking D, Wright D, Lijtmaer DA, Gascoigne D, Hernandez Martich D, Morningstar D, Neumann D, Steinke D, Marco DeBruin DD, Dobias D, Sears E, Richard E, Damstra E, Zakharov EV, Laberge F, Collins GE, Blagoev GA, Grainge G, Ansell G, Meredith G, Hogg I, McKeown J, Topan J, Bracey J, Guenther J, Sills-Gilligan J, Addesi J, Persi J, Layton KKS, D'Souza K, Dorji K, Grundy K, Nghidinwa K, Ronnenberg K, Lee KM, Xie L, Lu L, Penev L, Gonzalez M, Rosati ME, Kekkonen M, Kuzmina M, Iskandar M, Mutanen M, Fatahi M, Pentinsaari M, Bauman M, Nikolova N, Ivanova NV, Jones N, Weerasuriya N, Monkhouse N, Lavinia PD, Jannetta P, Hanisch PE, McMullin RT, Ojeda Flores R, Mouttet R, Vender R, Labbee RN, Forsyth R, Lauder R, Dickson R, Kroft R, Miller SE, MacDonald S, Panthi S, Pedersen S, Sobek-Swant S, Naik S, Lipinskaya T, Eagalle T, Decaëns T, Kosuth T, Braukmann T, Woodcock T, Roslin T, Zammit T, Campbell V, Dinca V, Peneva V, Hebert PDN, deWaard JR. Biodiversity inventories in high gear: DNA barcoding facilitates a rapid biotic survey of a temperate nature reserve. Biodivers Data J 2015; 3:e6313. [PMID: 26379469 PMCID: PMC4568406 DOI: 10.3897/bdj.3.e6313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2015] [Accepted: 08/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Comprehensive biotic surveys, or 'all taxon biodiversity inventories' (ATBI), have traditionally been limited in scale or scope due to the complications surrounding specimen sorting and species identification. To circumvent these issues, several ATBI projects have successfully integrated DNA barcoding into their identification procedures and witnessed acceleration in their surveys and subsequent increase in project scope and scale. The Biodiversity Institute of Ontario partnered with the rare Charitable Research Reserve and delegates of the 6th International Barcode of Life Conference to complete its own rapid, barcode-assisted ATBI of an established land trust in Cambridge, Ontario, Canada. NEW INFORMATION The existing species inventory for the rare Charitable Research Reserve was rapidly expanded by integrating a DNA barcoding workflow with two surveying strategies - a comprehensive sampling scheme over four months, followed by a one-day bioblitz involving international taxonomic experts. The two surveys resulted in 25,287 and 3,502 specimens barcoded, respectively, as well as 127 human observations. This barcoded material, all vouchered at the Biodiversity Institute of Ontario collection, covers 14 phyla, 29 classes, 117 orders, and 531 families of animals, plants, fungi, and lichens. Overall, the ATBI documented 1,102 new species records for the nature reserve, expanding the existing long-term inventory by 49%. In addition, 2,793 distinct Barcode Index Numbers (BINs) were assigned to genus or higher level taxonomy, and represent additional species that will be added once their taxonomy is resolved. For the 3,502 specimens, the collection, sequence analysis, taxonomic assignment, data release and manuscript submission by 100+ co-authors all occurred in less than one week. This demonstrates the speed at which barcode-assisted inventories can be completed and the utility that barcoding provides in minimizing and guiding valuable taxonomic specialist time. The final product is more than a comprehensive biotic inventory - it is also a rich dataset of fine-scale occurrence and sequence data, all archived and cross-linked in the major biodiversity data repositories. This model of rapid generation and dissemination of essential biodiversity data could be followed to conduct regional assessments of biodiversity status and change, and potentially be employed for evaluating progress towards the Aichi Targets of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jenna Quinn
- rare Charitable Research Reserve, Cambridge, Canada
| | - Kate Perez
- Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Alex Cadel
- University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
| | | | - Anais Pages
- Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | | | - Belén Bukowski
- Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales "Bernardino Rivadavia" (MACN-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Bill Wilson
- rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Christmas Ho
- Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Dario A Lijtmaer
- Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales "Bernardino Rivadavia" (MACN-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - David Gascoigne
- rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada
| | | | | | - Dirk Neumann
- SNSB, Zoologische Staatssammlung Muenchen, Munich, Germany
| | - Dirk Steinke
- Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Emily Damstra
- rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Gerrie Grainge
- rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada
| | | | | | - Ian Hogg
- University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | | | - Janet Topan
- Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada
| | - Jason Bracey
- rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada
| | - Jerry Guenther
- rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada
| | | | | | - Joshua Persi
- Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Kevin Grundy
- rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada
| | - Kirsti Nghidinwa
- Ministry of Environment and Tourism in Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia
| | | | | | - Linxi Xie
- The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Liuqiong Lu
- Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada
| | | | - Mailyn Gonzalez
- Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Margaret E Rosati
- Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington, United States of America
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Miriam Bauman
- rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Pablo D Lavinia
- Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales "Bernardino Rivadavia" (MACN-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Priscila E Hanisch
- Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales "Bernardino Rivadavia" (MACN-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | - Raphaëlle Mouttet
- ANSES, Laboratoire de la Santé des Végétaux, Montferrier sur Lez, France
| | - Reid Vender
- Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Ross Dickson
- rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada
| | - Ruth Kroft
- rare Charitable Research Reserve (Affiliate of), Cambridge, Canada
| | - Scott E Miller
- Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington, United States of America
| | | | - Sishir Panthi
- Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | | | | | - Suresh Naik
- Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada
| | - Tatsiana Lipinskaya
- Scientific and Practical Center for Bioresources, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus
| | | | - Thibaud Decaëns
- Université de Montpellier Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | - Tom Woodcock
- rare Charitable Research Reserve, Cambridge, Canada
| | - Tomas Roslin
- University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Tony Zammit
- Grand River Conservation Authority, Cambridge, Canada
| | | | - Vlad Dinca
- Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|