Acute coronary syndromes and acute heart failure: a diagnostic dilemma and high‐risk combination. A statement from the Acute Heart Failure Committee of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology

Incremental Value of Global Longitudinal Strain in the Long-Term Prediction of Heart Failure among Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) remains a common complication for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), especially after acute myocardial infarction. Although left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is conventionally used to assess cardiac function for risk stratification, it has been shown in other settings to underestimate the risk of HF compared with global longitudinal strain (GLS). Moreover, most evidence pertains to early-onset HF. We sought the clinical and myocardial predictors for late-onset HF in patients with CAD.

METHODS

We analyzed echocardiograms (including GLS) in 334 patients with CAD (ages 65 ± 11 years, 77% male) who were enrolled in the Nurse-Led Intervention for Less Chronic Heart Failure trial, a prospective, randomized controlled trial that compared standard care with nurse-led intervention to prevent HF in individuals at risk of incident HF. Long-term (9 years) follow-up was obtained via data linkage. Analysis was performed using a competing-risk model.

RESULTS

Baseline LVEF values were normal or mildly impaired (LVEF ≥ 40%) in all subjects. After a median of 9 years of follow-up, 50 (15%) of the 334 patients had new HF admissions, and 68 (20%) died. In a competing-risk model, HF was associated with GLS (hazard ratio = 1.15 [1.05-1.25], P = .001), independent of estimated glomerular filtration rate (hazard ratio = 0.98 [0.97-0.99], P = .045), Charlson comorbidity score (hazard ratio = 1.64 [1.25-2.15], P < .001), or E/e' (hazard ratio = 1.08 [1.02-1.14], P = .01). Global longitudinal strain-but not conventional echocardiographic measures-added incremental value to a clinical model based on age, gender, and Charlson score (area under the curve, 0.78-0.83, P = .01). Global longitudinal strain was still associated with HF development in patients taking baseline angiotensin convertase enzyme inhibitors (hazard ratio = 1.21 [1.11-1.31], P < .01) and baseline beta-blockers (1.17 [1.09, 1.26]; P < .01). Mortality was associated with older men, risk factors (hypertension or diabetes), and comorbidities (AF and chronic kidney disease).

CONCLUSIONS

Global longitudinal strain is independently associated with risk of incident HF in patients admitted with CAD and provides incremental prognostic value to standard markers. Identifying an at-risk subgroup using GLS may be the focus of future randomized controlled trails to enable targeted therapeutic intervention.

Trimethylamine N-Oxide Was Not Associated With 30-Day Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Patients With a First Anterior ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction After Primary Revascularization: A Sub-analysis From an Optical Coherence Tomography Registry

Objective: Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with poor outcome. Trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), a gut metabolite, is linked to cardiovascular diseases but its relationship with LVSD after STEMI remains unclear. The present study therefore aimed to investigate the relationship between TMAO and LVSD at 30 days after a first anterior STEMI.

Methods: This was a sub-study from the OCTAMI (Optical Coherence Tomography Examination in Acute Myocardial Infarction) registry. Eligible patients were included in current study if they: (1) presented with a first anterior STEMI; (2) had available baseline TMAO concentration; (3) completed a cardiovascular magnetic resonance examination at 30 days after STEMI. LVSD was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction < 50%. Associations between TMAO and left ventricular ejection fraction, infarct size and left ventricular global strain were examined.

Results: In total, 78 patients were included in final analysis. Overall, TMAO was moderately associated with peak cTnI (r = 0.27, p = 0.01), age (r = 0.34, p < 0.01), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (r = −0.30, p < 0.01). At 30-day follow-up, 41 patients were in the LVSD group and 37 in the non-LVSD group. Baseline TMAO levels were not significantly different between the two groups (LVSD vs. non-LVSD: median 1.9 μM, 25−75th percentiles 1.5–3.3 μM vs. median 1.9 μM, 25−75th percentiles 1.5–2.7 μM; p = 0.46). Linear regression analyses showed that TMAO was not associated with left ventricular ejection fraction, infarct size or left ventricular global strain at 30 days (all p > 0.05).

Conclusions: TMAO was not significantly correlated with 30-day LVSD in patients with a first anterior STEMI after primary revascularization.

Clinical Trial Registration:www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03593928.

Quality of Life Changes in Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

There is little up-to-date evidence about changes in quality of life following treatment for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. The main aim of this review was to assess the changes in QoL in ACS patients after treatment. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative studies. The search included studies that described the change of QoL of ACS patients after receiving treatment options such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and medical therapy (MT). We synthesized findings using content analysis and pooled the estimates using meta-analysis. We used the PRISMA guidelines to select and appraise the studies and report the findings. Twenty-nine (29) articles were included in the review. We found a significant improvement of QoL in ACS patients after receiving treatment. Particularly, the meta-analytic association found that the mean QoL of patients diagnosed with ACS was higher after receiving treatment compared to baseline (overall pooled mean difference = 31.88; 95% CI = 31.64–52.11, I² = 98) with patients on PCI having slightly lower QoL gains (pooled mean difference = 30.22; 95% CI = 29.9–30.53, I² = 0%) compared to those on CABG (pooled mean difference = 34.01; 95% CI = 33.66–34.37, I² = 0%). The review confirmed that QoL of ACS patients improved after receiving treatment therapies although varied by the treatment options and patients’ preferences. This suggests the need to perform further study on the QoL, patient preferences and physicians’ decision to prescription of treatment options.