Biliary complications after living donor liver transplantation

Risk factors and survival outcomes of biliary complications after adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation

The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk factors and survival outcomes of biliary complications (BCs) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) based on our single-center experience. From 2007 to 2010, 112 adult patients were assessed. Forty-nine patients (43.8%) experienced at least one episode of BCs, including biliary stricture and bile leak, occurring in 37.5% and 16.1% of the patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that hepatic artery thrombosis (relative risk (RR), 5.692; 95% CI, 2.132 to 15.201; p < 0.001), a hepatic duct diameter of less than 3 mm (RR, 2.523; 95% CI, 1.295 to 4.914; p = 0.005), ductoplasty (RR, 2.175; 95% CI, 1.134 to 4.174; p = 0.018), and cytomegalovirus infection (RR, 4.452; 95% CI, 1.868 to 10.613; p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for the development of BCs. However, these factors and BCs showed no prominent impact on the overall survival (OS) and graft survival (GS). In addition, the patients who developed vascular complications demonstrated poor outcomes in terms of OS (five-year, 56.3% vs. 78.1%; p = 0.017), GS (five-year, 56.3% vs. 77.1%; p = 0.023), and BC-free survival (five-year, 25.0% vs. 63.5%; p = 0.007) compared with patients without vascular complications. In conclusion, BCs remain a common problem after LDLT, especially for patients using duct-to-duct anastomosis. Hepatic artery thrombosis, a short duct diameter, ductoplasty, and cytomegalovirus infection lead to an increased incidence of BCs. The occurrence of BCs manifested no significant influence on the long-term survival outcomes. However, our findings await verification through large-scale randomized studies regarding the risk factors for the development of BCs and their impact on the prognosis.

Intrahepatic Artery Pseudoaneurysm-induced Hemobilia Caused by a Plastic Biliary Stent After ABO-incompatible Living-donor Liver Transplantation: A Case Report

Bile leakage after duct-to-duct anastomosis in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) can mostly be managed by therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Following this, various complications such as biliary infection, pancreatitis, perforation, and bleeding can occur, and endoscopic sphincterotomy is primarily associated with post- endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography bleeding; other causes have been published in case reports. In the present case, a plastic biliary stent used for treating liver abscesses and leakage at the bile duct anastomosis site after ABO-incompatible LDLT resulted in an intrahepatic artery pseudoaneurysm and hemobilia, which were managed by angiography and coil embolization. Although the complex postoperative course after LDLT can obscure the prompt diagnosis of an intrahepatic artery pseudoaneurysm and hemobilia, biliary stenting should be considered as a possible cause.

Advances in endoscopic management of biliary complications after living donor liver transplantation: Comprehensive review of the literature

Apart from noticeable improvements in surgical techniques and immunosuppressive agents, biliary complications remain the major causes of morbidity and mortality after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Bile leakage and stricture are the predominant complications. The reported incidence of biliary complications is 15%-40%, and these are known to occur more frequently in living donors than in deceased donors. Despite the absence of a confirmed therapeutic algorithm, many approaches have been used for treatment, including surgical, endoscopic, and percutaneous transhepatic techniques. In recent years, nonsurgical approaches have largely replaced reoperation. Among these, the endoscopic approach is currently the preferred initial treatment for patients who undergo duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction. Previously, endoscopic management was achieved most optimally through balloon dilatation and single or multiple stents placement. Recently, there have been significant developments in endoscopic devices, such as novel biliary stents, as well as advances in endoscopic technologies, including deep enteroscopy, the rendezvous technique, magnetic compression anastomosis, and direct cholangioscopy. These developments have resulted in almost all patients being managed by the endoscopic approach. Multiple recent publications suggest superior long-term results, with overall success rates ranging from 58% to 75%. This article summarizes the advances in endoscopic management of patients with biliary complications after LDLT.

Imaging of biliary complications in recipients of right-lobe living donor liver transplantation

Right-lobe living donor liver transplantation (RL-LDLT) is a common method devised in order to fulfill the demands of donor organ shortage in adult patients with end-stage liver diseases. However, biliary complications remain as the "Achilles' heel" of RL-LDLT, with wide variety of incidence among transplantation centers. Patients with biliary complications after RL-LDLT may have similar clinical presentations to those with other causes of graft dysfunction. Therefore, radiological evaluation plays a key role for differential diagnosis of such complications. In this article, we discuss the various methods of biliary reconstruction and imaging findings of common and uncommon biliary complications in recipients of RL-LDLT.

En Bloc Hilar Dissection of the Right Hepatic Artery in Continuity with the Bile Duct: a Technique to Reduce Biliary Complications After Adult Living-Donor Liver Transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Techniques that preserve the right hepatic artery and the common bile duct in continuity during the dissection may be associated with lower rates of biliary complications in living-donor liver transplants. This study sought to determine whether en bloc hilar dissections were associated with fewer biliary complications in living-donor liver transplants.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of 41 adult LDLTs performed in a single, liver transplant center between February 2007 and September 2014. The primary outcome of interest was the occurrence of at least one of the following biliary complications: anastomotic leak, stricture, or biloma. The primary predictor of interest was the hilar dissection technique: conventional hilar dissection vs. en bloc hilar dissection.

RESULTS

A total of 41 LDLTs were identified, 24 had a conventional, and 17 an en bloc hilar biliary dissection. The occurrence of any biliary complication was significantly more common in the conventional hilar dissection group compared to the en bloc hilar dissection group (66.7 vs. 35.3%, respectively, p = 0.047). In particularly, anastomotic strictures were significantly more common in the conventional hilar dissection group compared to the en bloc hilar dissection group (54.2 vs. 23.5%., respectively, p = 0.049).

CONCLUSION

En bloc hilar dissection technique may decrease biliary complication rates in living donor liver transplants.

Risk factors of biliary intervention by imaging after living donor liver transplantation

AIM: To determine the risk factors of biliary intervention using magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 196 patients who underwent right lobe LDLT between 2006 and 2010 at a single liver transplantation center. Direct duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis was performed in all 196 patients. MRCP images routinely taken 1 mo after LDLT were analyzed to identify risk factors for biliary intervention during follow-up, such as retrograde cholangiopancreatography or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Two experienced radiologists evaluated the MRCP findings, including the anastomosis site angle on three-dimensional images, the length of the filling defect on maximum intensity projection, bile duct dilatation, biliary stricture, and leakage.

RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients underwent biliary intervention during follow-up. The anastomosis site angle [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.48; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.30-0.75, P < 0.001], a filling defect in the anastomosis site (HR = 2.18, 95%CI: 1.41-3.38, P = 0.001), and biliary leakage (HR = 2.52, 95%CI: 1.02-6.20, P = 0.048) on MRCP were identified in the multivariate analysis as significant risk factors for biliary intervention during follow-up. Moreover, a narrower anastomosis site angle (i.e., below the median angle of 113.3°) was associated with earlier biliary intervention (38.5 ± 4.2 mo vs 62. 1 ± 4.1 mo, P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis comparing biliary intervention-free survival according to the anastomosis site angle revealed that lower survival was associated with a narrower anastomosis site angle (36.3% vs 62.0%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: The biliary anastomosis site angle in MRCP after LDLT may be associated with the need for biliary intervention.

Current diagnosis and treatment of benign biliary strictures after living donor liver transplantation

Despite advances in surgical techniques, benign biliary strictures after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remain a significant biliary complication and play an important role in graft and patient survival. Benign biliary strictures after transplantation are classified into anastomotic or non-anastomotic strictures. These two types differ in presentation, outcome, and response to therapy. The leading causes of biliary strictures include impaired blood supply, technical errors during surgery, and biliary anomalies. Because patients usually have non-specific symptoms, a high index of suspicion should be maintained. Magnetic resonance cholangiography has gained widespread acceptance as a reliable noninvasive tool for detecting biliary complications. Endoscopy has played an increasingly prominent role in the diagnosis and treatment of biliary strictures after LDLT. Endoscopic management in LDLT recipients may be more challenging than in deceased donor liver transplantation patients because of the complex nature of the duct-to-duct reconstruction. Repeated aggressive endoscopic treatment with dilation and the placement of multiple plastic stents is considered the first-line treatment for biliary strictures. Percutaneous and surgical treatments are now reserved for patients for whom endoscopic management fails and for those with multiple, inaccessible intrahepatic strictures or Roux-en-Y anastomoses. Recent advances in enteroscopy enable treatment, even in these latter cases. Direct cholangioscopy, another advanced form of endoscopy, allows direct visualization of the inner wall of the biliary tree and is expected to facilitate stenting or stone extraction. Rendezvous techniques can be a good option when the endoscopic approach to the biliary stricture is unfeasible. These developments have resulted in almost all patients being managed by the endoscopic approach.

[The results of biliary reconstructions after liver fragments transplantation]

AIM

To analyze the results of repeated reconstructions of choleresis after living related liver fragments transplantation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 268 recipients (145 women and 123 men) aged 5 months - 61 years (mean age 16,11 ± 14,62 years) who underwent liver fragments transplantation in the department of liver transplantation of cad. B.V. Petrovskiy Russian Research Surgery Center from 1997 to 2012. Biliary reconstructions were performed at different terms after transplantation in 37 patients (13.81%). Complications followed repeated reconstructions, the initial conditions for biliary anastomosis formation during transplantation, the results of biliary reconstructions after transplantation were analyzed.

RESULTS

In most cases despite the prevailing complications there is a combination of various biliary complications requiring biliary reconstruction. It was found that live rfragment used for transplantation, type of primary reconstruction of choler sis, number of bile ducts orifices of graft and biliary anastomoses do not demonstrate statistically significant effect on the incidence of post-transplant biliary reconstructions (p>0.05). Poor prognosis in patients with biliary complications required biliary reconstructionsis determined by the development of graft dysfunction. Early reconstruction before development of liver transplant dysfunction is necessary condition of successful treatment. In the case of graft dysfunction liver retransplantation is unique method of treatment.

The impact of metabolic syndrome and prevalent liver disease on living donor liver transplantation: a pressing need to expand the pool

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Organ shortage has been the ongoing obstacle to expanding liver transplantation worldwide. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is hoped to improve this shortage. The aim of the present study is to analyze the impact of metabolic syndrome and prevalent liver disease on living donations.

METHODS

From July 2007 to May 2012, 1065 potential living donors were evaluated according to a stepwise evaluation protocol. The age of the worked-up donors ranged from 18 to 45 years.

RESULTS

Only 190 (18%) were accepted for donation, and 875 (82%) were rejected. In total, 265 (24.9%) potential donors were excluded because of either diabetes or a body mass index >28. Some potential donors were excluded at initial screening because of incompatible blood groups (115; 10.8%), social reasons (40; 3.8%), or elevated liver enzymes (9; 1%). Eighty-five (8%) donors were excluded because of positive hepatitis serology. Steatosis resulted in the exclusion of 84 (8%) donors. In addition, 80 (7.5%) potential donors were rejected because of variations in biliary anatomy, and 20 (2%) were rejected because of aberrant vascular anatomy. Rejection due to biliary-related aberrancy decreased significantly in the second half of our program (11 vs. 4%, p = 0.001). In total, 110 (10.3%) potential donors were rejected because of insufficient remnant volume (<30%) as determined by CT volumetry, whereas 24 (2.2%) were rejected because of a graft-to-recipient body weight ratio less than 0.8%.

CONCLUSION

Metabolic syndrome and viral hepatitis negatively impacted our living donor pool. Expanding the donor pool requires the implementation of new strategies.

Biliary complications after pediatric liver transplantation: Risk factors, diagnosis and management

The expanded indications of partial grafts in pediatric liver transplantation have reduced waiting list mortality. However, a higher morbidity is observed, including an increased rate of biliary complications (BCs). Factors such as the type of graft, the preservation methods applied, the donor characteristics, the type of biliary reconstruction, and the number of bile ducts in the liver graft influences the occurrence of these complications. Bile leaks and strictures comprise the majority of post-transplant BCs. Biliary strictures require a high grade of suspicion, and because most children have a bileo-enteric anastomosis, its diagnosis and management rely on percutaneous hepatic cholangiography and percutaneous biliary interventions (PBI). The success rates with PBI range from 70% to 90%. Surgery is reserved for patients who have failed PBI. BCs in children after liver transplantation have a prolonged treatment and are associated with a longer length of stay and higher hospital costs. However, with early diagnosis and aggressive treatment, patient and graft survival are not significantly compromised.

Biliary complications in pediatric liver transplantation: Incidence and management over a decade

This study analyzed how features of a liver graft and the technique of biliary reconstruction interact to affect biliary complications in pediatric liver transplantation. A retrospective analysis was performed of data collected from 2001 to 2011 in a single high-volume North American pediatric transplant center. The study cohort comprised 173 pediatric recipients, 75 living donor (LD) and 98 deceased donor (DD) recipients. The median follow-up was 70 months. Twenty-nine (16.7%) patients suffered a biliary complication. The majority of leaks (9/12, 75.0%) and the majority of strictures (18/22, 81.8%) were anastomotic. There was no difference in the rate of biliary complications associated with DD (18.4%) and LD (14.7%) grafts (P = 0.55). Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstruction was associated with a significantly lower rate of biliary complications compared to duct-to-duct reconstruction (13.3% versus 28.2%, respectively; P = 0.048). RY anastomosis was the only significant factor protecting from biliary complications in our population (hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.85). The leaks were managed primarily by relaparotomy (10/12, 83.3%), and the majority of strictures were managed by percutaneous biliary intervention (14/22, 63.6%). Patients suffering biliary complications had inferior graft survival (P = 0.04) at 1, 5, and 10 years compared to patients without biliary complications. Our analysis demonstrates a lower incidence of biliary complications with RY biliary reconstruction, and patients with biliary complications have decreased graft survival.

Spectrum of biliary complications following live donor liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is the optimal treatment for many patients with advanced liver disease, including decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and acute liver failure. Organ shortage is the main determinant of death on the waiting list and hence living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) assumes importance. Biliary complications are the most common post operative morbidity after LDLT and occur due to anatomical and technical reasons. They include biliary leaks, strictures and cast formation and occur in the recipient as well as the donor. The types of biliary complications after LDLT along with their etiology, presenting features, diagnosis and endoscopic and surgical management are discussed.

Liver Transplantation Update: 2014

The first liver transplantation (LT) was performed by Thomas E Starzl five decades ago, and yet it remains the only therapeutic option offering gold standard treatment for end-stage liver disease (ESLD) and acute liver failure (ALF) and certain early-stage liver tumors. Post-liver transplantation survival has also dramatically improved over the last few decades despite increasing donor and recipient age and more frequent use of marginal organs to overcome the organ shortage. Currently, the overall 1 year survival following LT in the United States is reported as 85 to 90%, while the 10 years survival rate is ~50% (http://www.unos.org). The improvements are mainly due to progress in surgical techniques, postoperative intensive care, and the advent of new immunosuppressive agents. There are a number of factors that influence the outcomes prior to transplantation. Since 2002, the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score has been considered a predicting variable. It has been used to prioritize patients on the transplant waiting list and is currently the standard method used to assess severity in all etiologies of cirrhosis. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common standard MELD exception because the MELD does not necessarily reflect the medical urgency of patients with HCC. The criteria for candidates with HCC for receiving LT have evolved over the past decade. Now, patients with HCC who do not meet the traditional Milan (MC) or UCSF criteria for LT often undergo downstaging therapy I an effort to shrink the tumor size. The shortage of donor organs is a universal problem. In some countries, the development of a deceased organ donation program has been prevented due to socioeconomic, cultural, legal and other factors. Due to the shortage of cadaveric donors, several innovative techniques have been developed to expand the organ donor pool, such as split liver grafts, marginal- or extended-criteria donors, live donor liver transplantation (LDLT), and the use of organs donated after cardiac death. Herein, we briefly summarize recent advances in knowledge related to LT. We also report common causes of death after liver transplant, including the recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and its management, and coronary artery disease (CAD), including the role of the cardiac calcium score in identifying occult CAD.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Dogan S, Gurakar A. Liver Transplantation Update: 2014. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2015;5(2):98-106.

Roux-en-Y hepatico-jejunostomy for a left segmental graft: Do not twist the loop, stick it!

Biliary complications remain a major challenge for long-term success after LT, as it is, as a rule, the most common technical - early and late - complication that occurs, and because these complications contribute to a significant number of late graft losses and retransplantations. In the pediatric age group, both biliary atresia, as the patient's condition, and the use of a left liver graft, obtained by a liver division technique, make it necessary for the use of a Roux-en-Y jejunal loop for the biliary reconstruction in the majority of cases. A slight modification of the technique is presented, consisting of a straight positioning along the cut surface (rather than the conventional position that results in a harpoon shape). A favorable outcome in terms of a technical complication and graft survival was observed. This way of doing this is an interesting variation and adds to the surgical armamentarium.

Comparison of different magnetic resonance cholangiography techniques in living liver donors including Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced T1-weighted sequences

Objectives

Preoperative evaluation of potential living liver donors (PLLDs) includes the assessment of the biliary anatomy to avoid postoperative complications. Aim of this study was to compare T2-weighted (T2w) and Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced T1-weighted (T1w) magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) techniques in the evaluation of PLLDs.

Materials and Methods

30 PLLDs underwent MRC on a 1.5 T Magnetom Avanto (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) using (A) 2D T2w HASTE (Half Fourier Acquisition Single Shot Turbo Spin Echo) fat saturated (fs) in axial plane, (B) 2D T2w HASTE fs thick slices in coronal plane, (C) free breathing 3D T2w TSE (turbo spin echo) RESTORE (high-resolution navigator corrected) plus (D) maximum intensity projections (MIPs), (E) T2w SPACE (sampling perfection with application optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolutions) plus (F) MIPs and (G) T2w TSE BLADE as well as Gd-EOB-DTPA T1w images without (G) and with (H) inversion recovery. Contrast enhanced CT cholangiography served as reference imaging modality. Two independent reviewers evaluated the biliary tract anatomy on a 5-point scale subjectively and objectively. Data sets were compared using a Mann-Whitney-U-test. Kappa values were also calculated.

Results

Source images and maximum intensity projections of 3D T2w TSE sequences (RESTORE and SPACE) proved to be best for subjective and objective evaluation directly followed by 2D HASTE sequences. Interobserver variabilities were good to excellent (k = 0.622–0.804).

Conclusions

3D T2w sequences are essential for preoperative biliary tract evaluation in potential living liver donors. Furthermore, our results underline the value of different MRCP sequence types for the evaluation of the biliary anatomy in PLLDs including Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced T1w MRC.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for biliary anastomotic strictures after liver transplantation

Biliary complications after liver transplantation (LT) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality. In most cases, an anastomosis of the bile duct is performed as a duct-to-duct reconstruction, which makes endoscopic therapy with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) feasible. Biliary anastomotic strictures (AS) are the most common cause of biliary complications. The early detection of an AS, which can sometimes be challenging given that its clinical presentation is often subtle, is of key importance to obtain high treatment success. In this review, we focus on the management of AS after LT with a special emphasis on ERC.

End-to-end ductal anastomosis in biliary reconstruction: indications and limitations

End-to-end ductal anastomosis is a physiologic biliary reconstruction that is commonly used in liver transplantation and less frequently in the surgical treatment of iatrogenic bile duct injuries. Currently, end-to-end ductal anastomosis is the biliary reconstruction of choice for liver transplantation in most adult patients. In recent years, it has also been performed for liver transplantation in children and in select patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. The procedure is also performed in some patients with iatrogenic bile duct injuries, as it establishes physiologic bile flow. Proper digestion and absorption as well as postoperative endoscopic access are possible in patients who undergo end-to-end ductal anastomosis. It allows endoscopic diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in patients following surgery. This anastomosis is technically simple and associated with fewer early postoperative complications than the Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy; however, end-to-end ductal anastomosis is not possible to perform in all patients. This review discusses the indications for and limitations of this biliary reconstruction, the technique used in liver transplantation and surgical repair of injured bile ducts, suture types and use of a T-tube.

Bile duct reconstruction by a young surgeon in living donor liver transplantation using right liver graft

Biliary strictures and bile leaks account for the majority of biliary complications after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The aim of this study was to examine differences in biliary complications after adult LDLTs were performed by an experienced senior surgeon and an inexperienced junior surgeon. Surgeries included bile duct reconstruction after adult LDLT using a right liver graft, and risk factors for biliary stricture were identified. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 136 patients who underwent LDLT in order to identify patients who developed biliary complications. The senior surgeon performed 102 surgeries and the junior surgeon performed 34 surgeries. The proportion of patients with biliary stricture was similar between the senior and the junior surgeons (27.5% vs 26.5%; P = 0.911). However, the incidence of biliary leakage was higher in patients of the junior surgeon than in those of the senior surgeon (23.5% vs 2.9%; P = 0.001). The frequency of percutaneous drainage was also higher for the junior surgeon than the senior surgeon because of the junior surgeon's high leakage rate of the drainage. When the junior surgeon performed bile duct anastomosis, biliary leakage occurred in 7 patients between the 11th and 20th cases. However, biliary leakage occurred in only 1 case thereafter. Bile duct reconstruction performed by beginner surgeons in LDLT using right lobe grafts should be cautiously monitored and observed by a senior surgeon until an inexperienced junior surgeon has performed at least 20 cases, because of the high incidence of biliary leakage related to surgeon's inexperience in bile duct reconstructions in LDLT.

Diagnosis and management of biliary complications in pediatric living donor liver transplant recipients

The incidence of biliary complications (BCs) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) can reach 40%. Published data on the pediatric population are limited, and treatment protocols vary. Our aim was to describe the clinical scenario for BCs and treatment approaches after LDLT. Between October 1995 and December 2012, 489 pediatric LDLT procedures were performed. BCs developed in 71 patients (14.5%). Biliary strictures (BSs) developed in 45 (9.2%) patients, and bile leaks (BLs) developed in 33 patients (6.7%). The BL diagnosis was clinical in all cases, and 69.7% of the patients underwent surgery. Nearly half of the BS cases had clinical features or suggestive ultrasound findings. Liver biopsy findings suggested BSs in 51.7%. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography was performed in 95.6% of the BS patients. The success rate was 77% [mean number of percutaneous biliary interventions (PBIs) = 3.9 ± 1.98, median drainage time = 8 months]. In conclusion, BL patients can be managed with conservative therapy, even though most of these patients will ultimately be treated with surgery. Diagnosing a BS requires a high degree of clinical suspicion because the available resources for its identification can fail in up to 50% of cases. A higher number of PBIs and the use of a drainage catheter for a longer time may be required to achieve better results with this technique.

Living donor liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) continues to evolve, generating interesting issues on the applicability and safety of new techniques.

RECENT FINDINGS

Specific selection criteria and standardized surgical techniques with high ethical and medical standards are needed to minimize donor risk. In this aspect, minimally invasive donor hepatectomy has caused controversies. The reproducibility and safety of pure laparoscopic major hepatectomy in LDLT remains uncertain. Therefore, a stepwise approach is needed to avoid unnecessary donor risk. To expand the living donor pool, dual graft and ABO-incompatible LDLT have emerged as well tolerated and effective methods. The extended selection criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma in LDLT appear acceptable to balance donor risk and recipient outcome. However, these criteria should be validated based on the risk-benefit ratio. Despite technical advances, technical challenges persist such as Budd-Chiari syndrome and portal vein thrombosis. To address these issues, several innovative surgical techniques have been proposed and have shown promising results.

SUMMARY

LDLT is associated with donor safety concerns, technical complexity, and small-for-size issues. Nonetheless, accumulated experience and technical know-how from large-volume Asian LDLT centers have led to progress in LDLT. Further technical refinement and investigation to overcome the disadvantages of partial grafts will broaden the applicability of LDLT.

The efficiency of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography in living donor liver transplantation: a preliminary study

The aim of this study was to evaluate utility of gadoxetic acid disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) for the detection of biliary complications after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). A total of 18 patients with suspected biliary complications underwent MRC. T2-weighted MRC and contrast-enhanced MRC (CE-MRC) were used to identify the biliary complications. MRC included routine breath-hold T2-weighted MRC using half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) sequences and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRC T1-weighted volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) sequences. Before confirming the biliary complications, one observer reviewed the MRC images and the CE-MRC images separately. The verification procedures and MRC findings were compared, and the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of both techniques were calculated for the identification of biliary complications. The observer found six of seven biliary complications using CE-MRC. The sensitivity was 85.7% and the accuracy was 94.4%. Using MRC alone, sensitivity was 57.1% and accuracy was 55.5%. The accuracy of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRC was superior to MRC in locating biliary leaks (p < 0.05). The usage of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRC yields information that complements the MRC findings that improve the identification of biliary complications. We recommend the use of MRC in addition to Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRC to increase the preoperative accuracy when assessing the biliary complications after LDLT.

Internal hernia in a liver transplant recipien: a case report

Biliary complications have great importance for liver transplant recipients because of affecting long-term prognosis. In rare situations, an internal hernia of the Roux-en-Y loop cause graft injury. A 42-year-old woman with a history of living donor liver transplantation 6 years ago presented with prolonged graft injury during the past 6 months. She suddenly developed ileus of the small bowel with internal hernia through the defect of the mesentery around the Roux-en-Y limb of the hepaticojejunostomy. Emergent surgery was performed to reduce the hernia and volvulus; also the mesenteric rent was closed with interrupted suture of silk. Internal hernia of the small bowel after liver transplantation is rare but causes graft injury due to associated biliary complications and rapid deterioration of patient's condition.

Repair of a post-hepatectomy posterior sectoral duct injury secondary to anomalous bile duct anatomy using a novel combined surgical-interventional radiologic approach

A 64-year-old woman with a completely transected posterior sectoral duct following extended hepatectomy underwent a combined operative procedure with interventional radiology and surgery to restore biliary-enteric drainage. The anterior and posterior sectoral ducts were identified, and catheters were inserted into both systems. The posterior sectoral catheter was placed intraoperatively through a preoperatively placed sheath, and a new tunnel was created through the regenerated liver surface. Biliary-enteric anastomoses were created over the stents.

Response to endoscopic therapy for biliary anastomotic strictures in deceased versus living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic therapy has been successful in the management of biliary complications after both deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) and living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). LDLT is thought to be associated with higher rates of biliary complications, but there are few studies comparing the success of endoscopic management of anastomotic strictures between the two groups. This study aims to compare our experience in the endoscopic management of anastomotic strictures in DDLT versus LDLT.

METHODS

This is a retrospective database review of all liver transplant patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) after liver transplantation. The frequency of anastomotic stricture and the time to develop and to resolve anastomotic stricture were compared between DDLT and LDLT. The response of anastomotic stricture to endoscopic therapy was also analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 362 patients underwent liver transplantation between 2003 and 2011, with 125 requiring ERCP to manage biliary complications. Thirty-three (9.9%) cases of DDLT and 8 (27.6%) of LDLT (P=0.01) were found to have anastomotic stricture. When comparing DDLT and LDLT, there was no difference in the mean time to the development of anastomotic strictures (98+/-17 vs 172+/-65 days, P=0.11), likelihood of response to ERCP [22 (66.7%) vs 6 (75.0%), P=0.69], mean time to the resolution of anastomotic strictures (268+/-77 vs 125+/-37 days, P=0.34), and the number of ERCPs required to achieve resolution (3.9+/-0.4 vs 4.7+/-0.9, P=0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic therapy is effective in the majority of biliary complications relating to liver transplantation. Anastomotic strictures occur more frequently in LDLT compared with DDLT, with equivalent endoscopic treatment response and outcomes for both groups.

Biliary and vascular anomalies in living liver donors: the role and accuracy of pre-operative radiological mapping

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to determine the utility of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) anatomic mapping in the detection of biliary and vascular anomalies prior to a living liver donor (LLD) operation.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all LLD patient charts, operative and radiology reports from 1 January 2002 to 1 January 2012 was conducted. Primary post-operative outcomes assessed included mortality, re-operation, readmission and need for endoscopic or percutaneous intervention. Sensitivity and specificity of MR and CT pre-operative screening was calculated against the gold standard of intra-operative findings.

RESULTS

A total of 34 donors had an average age of 38 years (range: 22-58) with a body mass index (BMI) of 25.6 kg/m(2) (range: 19.8-32.5) and a length of stay (LOS) of 10.1 days (range: 5-41). There were no donor mortalities. Sensitivity and specificity of CT was 70.0% and 91.3%, and of MRI screening 23.1% and 100.0%, respectively. Patients with inaccurate pre-operative CT or MRI did not have an increased risk of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Even although it was specific, pre-operative MR screening missed up to 77.0% of biliary anomalies. An impeccable surgical technique remains the key in preventing biliary complications of a living donor hepatectomy where pre-operative MRI screening is false.

Rendezvous ductoplasty for biliary anastomotic stricture after living-donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Biliary anastomotic stricture (BAS) after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is difficult to manage. We used rendezvous ductoplasty (RD) to treat BAS after LDLT.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 53 patients with BAS after adult-to-adult LDLT with duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction.

RESULTS

BAS was classified according to endoscopic retrograde cholangiography findings after normal-pressure contrast injection: type I (n=32) in which the stricture was visualized; type II (n=13) in which the common hepatic duct and graft intrahepatic ducts were visualized, but the stricture was not visualized; or type III (n=8) in which the stricture and graft intrahepatic ducts were not visualized. In right lobe grafts, types II and III occurred more frequently than type I (P=0.0023). Type I had significantly shorter cold ischemic time (76±11 vs. 118±12 min; P=0.0155) and warm ischemic time (38±2 vs. 49±3 min; P=0.0069) than types II and III. The number of attempts to pass the guidewire through the stricture was significantly lower in type I (1.2±0.2 attempts) than type II (2.2±0.2 attempts; P=0.0018) or type III (2.8±0.3 attempts; P<0.0001). The treatment success rate was 78.1% for type I, 38.5% for type II, and 50.0% for type III (P=0.0282). RD was the first successful treatment in a higher proportion of types II and III patients than type I patients (66.7% vs. 6.3%; P<0.0001). Cumulative treatment success rates were not significantly different between the RD and the non-RD groups (P=0.0920).

CONCLUSIONS

RD was a useful treatment for difficult cases of BAS after LDLT and achieved successful outcomes.

Post-transplant biliary complications: an analysis from a predominantly living donor liver transplant center

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Biliary anastomosis is the Achilles' heel of liver transplant. The reported incidence of biliary complications is 5-15% after deceased donor liver transplantation, and 20-34% after right-lobe live donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We report our experience from an LDLT program.

METHODS

Between September 2006 and August 2010, 338 liver transplants were performed. Biliary reconstructions were done with an end-to-end choledochocholedochostomy in 307 cases. All recipients were monitored for any evidence of bile leak or stricture.

RESULTS

Of 338 transplants performed during this time period, 65 patients had biliary complications (19%). Of these, 30 were biliary leaks, and 35 patients had biliary stricture. Four were cut surface leaks, which settled without any intervention. One patient had leak from primary hepaticojejunostomy, which settled on conservative management. Twenty-five patients had anastomotic leaks, of which 17 underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and stenting; another eight underwent re-exploration and hepaticojejunostomy. Forty-five patients had biliary strictures. Of these, 10 patients had bile leak initially, followed by biliary stricture. Patients with a double duct anastomosis had a significantly higher risk of developing biliary complications compared with those with a single duct anastomosis. There was no statistically significant difference in survival between those with or without biliary complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Biliary complications are common after LDLT. Most leaks will subsequently form strictures. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is the first-line treatment for biliary complications, with surgery required in a minority of cases. The incidence of biliary complications is higher in multiple duct anastomoses. Biliary complications are not associated with increased mortality.

Endoscopic approach to the post liver transplant patient

Biliary complications occur after liver transplantation. These complications can be effectively and safely managed using endoscopic approaches and can prevent unnecessary and potentially morbid surgery.

Development, management, and resolution of biliary complications after living and deceased donor liver transplantation: a report from the adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study consortium

Adult recipients of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) have a higher incidence of biliary complications than recipients of deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). Our objective was to define the intensity of the interventions and the time to resolution after the diagnosis of biliary complications after liver transplantation. We analyzed the management and resolution of posttransplant biliary complications and investigated the comparative effectiveness of interventions in LDLT and DDLT recipients. For the analysis of biliary complications (leaks or strictures), we used a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent liver transplantation at 8 centers between 1998 and 2006 (median follow-up from onset=4.7 years). The numbers, procedure types, and times to resolution were compared for LDLT and DDLT recipients. Posttransplant biliary complications occurred in 47 of the 189 DDLT recipients (25%) and in 141 of the 356 LDLT recipients (40%). Biliary leaks constituted 38% of the post-DDLT biliary complications (n=18) and 65% of the post-LDLT biliary complications (n=91). The median times to first biliary complications were similar for DDLT and LDLT (11 versus 14 days for leaks, P=0.63; 69 versus 107 days for strictures, P=0.34). Overall, 1225 diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, including reoperation and retransplantation, were performed (6.5±5.4 per recipient; 5.5±3.6 for DDLT versus 6.8±5.8 for LDLT, P=0.52). The median number of months to the resolution of a biliary complication (i.e., a tube-, stent-, and drain-free status) did not significantly differ between the DDLT and LDLT groups for leaks (2.3 versus 1.3 months, P=0.29) or strictures (4.9 versus 2.3 months, P=0.61). Although the incidence of biliary complications is higher after LDLT versus DDLT, the treatment requirements and the time to resolution after the development of a biliary complication are similar for LDLT and DDLT recipients.

Endoscopic treatment of anastomotic biliary strictures after living donor liver transplantation: outcomes after maximal stent therapy

BACKGROUND

Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has emerged as a viable strategy in an era of organ shortage. However, biliary strictures are a common complication of LDLT, and these strictures frequently require surgical revision after unsuccessful endoscopic therapy. The optimal endoscopic treatment for anastomotic biliary strictures (ABSs) after LDLT is undefined.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the outcome of an aggressive endoscopic approach to ABSs after LDLT that uses endoscopic dilation followed by maximal stent placement.

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

SETTING

A tertiary-care academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Forty-one patients with a diagnosis of ABS.

INTERVENTIONS

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with balloon dilation and maximal stenting.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Stricture resolution, stricture recurrence, and complication rates.

RESULTS

Of 110 LDLTs completed, a biliary stricture developed after transplantation in 41 (37.3%), which included 38 patients with duct-to-duct anastomosis. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up time is 74.2 (2.5-120.8) months. Among them, 23 (60.5%) were male, and 20 (52.6%) had bile leakage associated with ABSs. The median time (IQR) to the development of an ABS after LDLT was 2.1 (1.2-4.1) months. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography was attempted as initial therapy in all patients: 32 were managed entirely by endoscopic therapy, and 6 required initial percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) to cross the biliary stricture, with endoscopic therapy performed thereafter. A median (IQR) of 4.0 (3.0-5.3) endoscopic interventions and 7.0 (4.0-10.3) stents were required to resolve the stricture. The time from the first intervention to stricture resolution was 5.3 (range 3.8-8.9) months. Biochemical markers including aspartate transaminase (76 vs 39 U/L, P = .001), alanine transaminase (127.5 vs 45.5 U/L, P < .001), alkaline phosphatase (590 vs 260 IU/L, P < .001), and total bilirubin (2.57 vs 1.73 mg/dL, P = .017) significantly improved after intervention. Recurrent stricture was observed after initial treatment in 8 (21%) patients. All recurrences were successfully re-treated endoscopically. All patients have been managed without surgical revision or retransplantation, resulting in 100% success by an intention-to-treat analysis.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study, small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, aggressive endoscopy-based treatment with maximal stent placement strategy allows 100% resolution of all duct-to-duct ABSs after LDLT without the need for surgical intervention or retransplantation.

Endoscopic treatment for biliary stricture after orthotopic liver transplantation: success, recurrence and their influencing factors

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the success and recurrence rates and factors influencing the effect of endoscopic therapy for patients with biliary stricture after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

METHODS

Data of 56 patients who underwent endoscopic therapy for biliary stricture after OLT from 2006 to 2009 were reviewed in this study. Their clinical data, laboratory parameters and endoscopic features were recorded.

RESULTS

Biliary stricture was treated successfully in 47 patients (83.9%). Compared with those with treatment failure, there was a longer duration from OLT to initial presentations (P = 0.02) in the successful group, fewer endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) treatments (P < 0.01) and fewer stents inserted per patient (P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that the number of ERCP treatments per patient was negatively related with treatment success. Of the 47 patients successfully treated, stricture recurred in 13 (27.7%) during follow-up. Compared with those without recurrence, the recurrence group had a shorter initial presentation time after OLT, higher serum alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and γ-glutamyltransferase levels, higher numbers of ERCP treatments and stents used and a longer duration of treatment (P < 0.01 for all). Multivariate analysis showed that the treatment duration was a risk factor for recurrence (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.34-4.05, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic treatment is a safe and effective modality for biliary stricture after OLT. The number of ERCP treatments per patient is negatively related with treatment success and long treatment duration was a risk factor for stricture recurrence.