51
|
Suh J, Clarke V, Amato AA, Guidon AC. Safety and outcomes of eculizumab for acetylcholine receptor-positive generalized myasthenia gravis in clinical practice. Muscle Nerve 2022; 66:348-353. [PMID: 35684980 DOI: 10.1002/mus.27656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/AIMS Safety and outcomes data on eculizumab for generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) in clinical practice remain limited. Outcomes and concomitant medication use may differ in practice compared with clinical trials. We analyzed the clinical and safety outcomes of patients who received eculizumab at our institutions. METHODS Patients with acetylcholine receptor antibody positive (AChR+) gMG, who received ≥1 dose of eculizumab and had ≥1 follow-up before December 10, 2021, were identified. Data were abstracted by chart review. Outcomes included MG Foundation of America Post Intervention Status (MGFA-PIS), Clinical Classification (MGFA-CC), MG-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), concurrent immunomodulatory therapy use, and adverse events. RESULTS Twelve patients were included. Mean age at eculizumab initiation was 57.4 y (range, 21-77). Eight had refractory MG. Four had history of thymoma and thymectomy. A mean of 3.2 (range, 2-5) immunomodulatory therapies were previously tried. Mean follow-up duration was 18 mo (range, 2-21.6). Clinical improvement occurred rapidly; MGFA-PIS was improved in 80%, and MGFA-CC improved in 83% at 1 mo. Mean MG-ADL decreased from 8.7 to 2.8 at 1 mo, and remained ≤ 3 $$ \le 3 $$ .5 over 1.5 y. Mean daily prednisone dose decreased from 22.5 mg to 7.2 mg at 1.5 y. Five of 7 patients discontinued maintenance IVIG or PLEX. No patients had meningococcal infections and adverse events were mild. DISCUSSION Clinical improvement occurred in most patients after eculizumab initiation, beginning as quickly as 1 mo. Steroids were tapered and maintenance IVIG and PLEX were discontinued in most. Eculizumab had a favorable safety profile even when combined with other immunosuppressants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joome Suh
- Division of Neuromuscular Medicine, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Virginia Clarke
- Division of Neuromuscular Medicine, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Anthony A Amato
- Division of Neuromuscular Medicine, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amanda C Guidon
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Neuromuscular Medicine, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Complement Activation Profile in Myasthenia Gravis Patients: Perspectives for Tailoring Anti-Complement Therapy. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10061360. [PMID: 35740382 PMCID: PMC9220000 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10061360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The complement system plays a key role in myasthenia gravis (MG). Anti-complement drugs are emerging as effective therapies to treat anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody-positive MG patients, though their usage is still limited by the high costs. Here, we searched for plasma complement proteins as indicators of complement activation status in AChR-MG patients, and potential biomarkers for tailoring anti-complement therapy in MG. Plasma was collected from AChR-MG and MuSK-MG patients, and healthy controls. Multiplex immunoassays and ELISA were used to quantify a panel of complement components (C1Q, C2, C3, C4, C5, Factor B, Factor H, MBL, and properdin) and activation products (C4b, C3b, C5a, and C5b-9), of classical, alternative and lectin pathways. C2 and C5 levels were significantly reduced, and C3, C3b, and C5a increased, in plasma of AChR-MG, but not MuSK-MG, patients compared to controls. This protein profile was indicative of complement activation. We obtained sensitivity and specificity performance results suggesting plasma C2, C3, C3b, and C5 as biomarkers for AChR-MG. Our findings reveal a plasma complement “C2, C3, C5, C3b, and C5a” profile associated with AChR-MG to be further investigated as a biomarker of complement activation status in AChR-MG patients, opening new perspectives for tailoring of anti-complement therapies to improve the disease treatment.
Collapse
|
53
|
Nelke C, Schroeter CB, Stascheit F, Pawlitzki M, Regner-Nelke L, Huntemann N, Arat E, Öztürk M, Melzer N, Mergenthaler P, Gassa A, Stetefeld H, Schroeter M, Berger B, Totzeck A, Hagenacker T, Schreiber S, Vielhaber S, Hartung HP, Meisel A, Wiendl H, Meuth SG, Ruck T. Eculizumab versus rituximab in generalised myasthenia gravis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2022; 93:548-554. [PMID: 35246490 PMCID: PMC9016243 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-328665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Myasthenia gravis (MG) is the most common autoimmune disorder affecting the neuromuscular junction. However, evidence shaping treatment decisions, particularly for treatment-refractory cases, is sparse. Both rituximab and eculizumab may be considered as therapeutic options for refractory MG after insufficient symptom control by standard immunosuppressive therapies. METHODS In this retrospective observational study, we included 57 rituximab-treated and 20 eculizumab-treated patients with MG to compare the efficacy of treatment agents in generalised, therapy-refractory anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody (anti-AChR-ab)-mediated MG with an observation period of 24 months. Change in the quantitative myasthenia gravis (QMG) score was defined as the primary outcome parameter. Differences between groups were determined in an optimal full propensity score matching model. RESULTS Both groups were comparable in terms of clinical and demographic characteristics. Eculizumab was associated with a better outcome compared with rituximab, as measured by the change of the QMG score at 12 and 24 months of treatment. Minimal manifestation of disease was more frequently achieved in eculizumab-treated patients than rituximab-treated patients at 12 and 24 months after baseline. However, the risk of myasthenic crisis (MC) was not ameliorated in either group. INTERPRETATION This retrospective, observational study provides the first real-world evidence supporting the use of eculizumab for the treatment of refractory, anti-AChR-ab positive MG. Nonetheless, the risk of MC remained high and prompts the need for intensified monitoring and further research effort aimed at this vulnerable patient cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Nelke
- Department of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Frauke Stascheit
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marc Pawlitzki
- Department of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.,Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Liesa Regner-Nelke
- Department of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Niklas Huntemann
- Department of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Ercan Arat
- Department of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Menekse Öztürk
- Department of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Nico Melzer
- Department of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Philipp Mergenthaler
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Asmae Gassa
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Koln, Germany
| | - Henning Stetefeld
- Departement of Neurology, Uniklinik Koln, Koln, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | | | - Benjamin Berger
- Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Totzeck
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Tim Hagenacker
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Stefanie Schreiber
- Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Vielhaber
- Otto von Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Hartung
- Department of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Andreas Meisel
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Center for Stroke Research Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Heinz Wiendl
- Department of Neurology - Inflammatory Disorders of the Nervous System and Neurooncology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Sven G Meuth
- Department of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Tobias Ruck
- Department of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Diez Porras L, Homedes C, Alberti MA, Velez Santamaria V, Casasnovas C. Quality of Life in Myasthenia Gravis and Correlation of MG-QOL15 with Other Functional Scales. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11082189. [PMID: 35456281 PMCID: PMC9025772 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11082189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in myasthenia gravis (MG) is frequently decreased. Further, there are many validated clinical scales and questionnaires to evaluate the clinical status in MG. We aimed to determine if there was an improvement in HRQOL following an intensive treatment for MG, identify which demographic and clinical features influenced patients’ HRQOL, and investigate if the questionnaire MG-QOL15 correlated with other evaluation scales. We recruited 45 patients with generalised MG who were starting immunomodulatory treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins and prednisone for the first time. At each visit, we administered several validated scales for MG. The mean MG-QOL15 score improved significantly at 4 and 6 weeks of the study. Additionally, the MG-QOL15 score correlated strong with the Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and the Neuro-QOL Fatigue and weakest with the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Scoring System (QMG). The QMG score prior to study enrolment was associated with HRQOL. We observed that HRQOL in MG improved after receiving an intensive immunomodulatory treatment and achieving better control of the symptoms. The questionnaire MG-QOL15 correlated positively with other clinical measures. As MG is a fluctuating condition, and some symptoms are difficult to examine, we direct physicians toward the use of scales and questionnaires composed of items perceived by the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Diez Porras
- Neurometabolic Diseases Group, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), 199 Granvia de l’Hospitalet, 08908 L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain; (L.D.P.); (C.H.); (M.A.A.); (V.V.S.)
| | - Christian Homedes
- Neurometabolic Diseases Group, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), 199 Granvia de l’Hospitalet, 08908 L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain; (L.D.P.); (C.H.); (M.A.A.); (V.V.S.)
| | - Maria Antonia Alberti
- Neurometabolic Diseases Group, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), 199 Granvia de l’Hospitalet, 08908 L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain; (L.D.P.); (C.H.); (M.A.A.); (V.V.S.)
- Neuromuscular Unit, Department of Neurology, Bellvitge University Hospital, Feixa Llarga Street n/n, 08907 L’Hospitalet del Llobregat, Spain
| | - Valentina Velez Santamaria
- Neurometabolic Diseases Group, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), 199 Granvia de l’Hospitalet, 08908 L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain; (L.D.P.); (C.H.); (M.A.A.); (V.V.S.)
- Neuromuscular Unit, Department of Neurology, Bellvitge University Hospital, Feixa Llarga Street n/n, 08907 L’Hospitalet del Llobregat, Spain
| | - Carlos Casasnovas
- Neurometabolic Diseases Group, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), 199 Granvia de l’Hospitalet, 08908 L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain; (L.D.P.); (C.H.); (M.A.A.); (V.V.S.)
- Neuromuscular Unit, Department of Neurology, Bellvitge University Hospital, Feixa Llarga Street n/n, 08907 L’Hospitalet del Llobregat, Spain
- Center for Biomedical Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), ISCIII, 3–5 Monforte de Lemos, Pabellón 121, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
McCombe JA, Pittock SJ. Anti-complement Agents for Autoimmune Neurological Disease. Neurotherapeutics 2022; 19:711-728. [PMID: 35553024 PMCID: PMC9294087 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-022-01223-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, there has been increasing recognition of the diversity of autoimmune neurological diseases affecting all levels of the nervous system. A growing understanding of disease pathogenesis has enabled us to better target specific elements of the immune system responsible for the cell dysfunction and cell destruction seen in these diseases. This is no better demonstrated than in the development of complement directed therapies for the treatment of complement mediated autoimmune neurological conditions. Herein, we describe the basic elements of the complement cascade, provide an overview of select autoimmune neurological diseases whose pathogenesis is mediated by complement, the effector system of autoantigen bound autoantibodies, and discuss the complement directed therapies trialed in the treatment of these diseases. Several complement-directed therapies have demonstrated benefit in the treatment of autoimmune neurological diseases; we also review the trials resulting in the approval of these therapies for the treatment of AChR Ab-positive myasthenia gravis (MG) and neuromyelitis spectrum disorder. Finally, on the heels of the recent successes described, we discuss possibilities for the future, including additional targeted therapies with greater ease of administration, improved risk profiles, and other possible uses for therapeutics targeting elements of the complement cascade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A McCombe
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Sean J Pittock
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Abstract
Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) comprises a heterogeneous group of disorders in which the host immune system targets self-antigens expressed in the central nervous system. The most conspicuous example is an anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis linked to a complex neuropsychiatric syndrome. Current treatment of AE is based on immunotherapy and has been established according to clinical experience and along the concept of a B cell-mediated pathology induced by highly specific antibodies to neuronal surface antigens. In general, immunotherapy for AE follows an escalating approach. When first-line therapy with steroids, immunoglobulins, and/or plasma exchange fails, one converts to second-line immunotherapy. Alkylating agents could be the first choice in this stage. However, due to their side effect profile, most clinicians give preference to monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed at B cells such as rituximab. Newer mAbs might be added as a third-line therapy in the future, or be given even earlier if shown effective. In this chapter, we will discuss mAbs targeting B cells (rituximab, ocrelizumab, inebulizumab, daratumumab), IL-6 (tocilizumab, satralizumab), the neonatal Fc receptor (FCRn) (efgartigimod, rozanolixizumab), and the complement cascade (eculizumab).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Smets
- Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M J Titulaer
- Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Querol LA, Hartung HP, Lewis RA, van Doorn PA, Hammond TR, Atassi N, Alonso-Alonso M, Dalakas MC. The Role of the Complement System in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: Implications for Complement-Targeted Therapies. Neurotherapeutics 2022; 19:864-873. [PMID: 35378684 PMCID: PMC9294101 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-022-01221-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is the most common, heterogeneous, immune-mediated neuropathy, characterized by predominant demyelination of motor and sensory nerves. CIDP follows a relapsing-remitting or a progressive course and causes substantial disability. The pathogenesis of CIDP involves a complex interplay of multiple aberrant immune responses, creating a pro-inflammatory environment, subsequently inflicting damage on the myelin sheath. Though the exact triggers are unclear, diverse immune mechanisms encompassing cellular and humoral pathways are implicated. The complement system appears to play a role in promoting macrophage-mediated demyelination. Complement deposition in sural nerve biopsies, as well as signs of increased complement activation in serum and CSF of patients with CIDP, suggest complement involvement in CIDP pathogenesis. Here, we present a comprehensive overview of the preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the potential role of the complement system in CIDP. This understanding furnishes a strong rationale for targeting the complement system to develop new therapies that could serve the unmet needs of patients affected by CIDP, particularly in those refractory to standard therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis A Querol
- Neuromuscular Diseases Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hans-Peter Hartung
- Department of Neurology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Brain and Mind Center, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Neurology, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | | | | | | | - Nazem Atassi
- Sanofi, Neurology Clinical Development, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - Marinos C Dalakas
- Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Neuroimmunology National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Alhaidar MK, Abumurad S, Soliven B, Rezania K. Current Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11061597. [PMID: 35329925 PMCID: PMC8950430 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11061597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is the most extensively studied antibody-mediated disease in humans. Substantial progress has been made in the treatment of MG in the last century, resulting in a change of its natural course from a disease with poor prognosis with a high mortality rate in the early 20th century to a treatable condition with a large proportion of patients attaining very good disease control. This review summarizes the current treatment options for MG, including non-immunosuppressive and immunosuppressive treatments, as well as thymectomy and targeted immunomodulatory drugs.
Collapse
|
59
|
Schneider-Gold C, Gilhus NE. Advances and challenges in the treatment of myasthenia gravis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2022; 14:17562864211065406. [PMID: 34987614 PMCID: PMC8721395 DOI: 10.1177/17562864211065406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic autoimmune disease with fluctuating muscle weakness and fatigability. Standard immunomodulatory treatment may fail to achieve sufficient improvement with minimal symptom expression or remission of myasthenic symptoms, despite adequate dosing and duration of treatment. Treatment-resistant MG poses a challenge for both patients and treating neurologists and requires new therapeutic approaches. The spectrum of upcoming immunotherapies that more specifically address distinct targets of the main immunological players in MG pathogenesis includes T-cell directed monoclonal antibodies that block the intracellular cascade associated with T-cell activation, monoclonal antibodies directed against key B-cell molecules, as well as monoclonal antibodies against the fragment crystallizable neonatal receptor (FcRn), cytokines and transmigration molecules, and also drugs that inhibit distinct elements of the complement system activated by the pathogenic MG antibodies. The review gives an overview on new drugs being evaluated in still ongoing or recently finished controlled clinical trials and drugs of potential benefit in MG due to their mechanisms of action and positive effects in other autoimmune disorders. Also, the challenges associated with the new therapeutic options are discussed briefly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christiane Schneider-Gold
- Department of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Gudrunstrasse 56, Bochum D-44791, Germany
| | - Nils Erik Gilhus
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, NorwayDepartment of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Muppidi S, Silvestri NJ, Tan R, Riggs K, Leighton T, Phillips GA. Utilization of MG-ADL in myasthenia gravis clinical research and care. Muscle Nerve 2022; 65:630-639. [PMID: 34989427 PMCID: PMC9302997 DOI: 10.1002/mus.27476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Living (MG‐ADL) scale is an 8‐item patient‐reported scale that measures myasthenia gravis (MG) symptoms and functional status. The objective of the current review is to summarize the psychometric properties of the MG‐ADL and published evidence of MG‐ADL use. A targeted literature review for published studies of the MG‐ADL was conducted using a database and gray literature search. A total of 48 publications and 35 clinical trials were included. Studies indicated that the MG‐ADL is a reliable and valid measure that has been used as an outcome in clinical trials and observational studies to measure MG symptoms and response to treatment. While most often used as a secondary endpoint in clinical trials, its use as a primary endpoint has increased in recent years. The most common MG‐ADL endpoint is change in MG‐ADL score from baseline, although there has been an increase in the analysis of a responder threshold using the MG‐ADL. A new concept of minimal symptom expression (MSE) has emerged more recently. Duration of treatment effect is another important construct that is being increasingly evaluated using the MG‐ADL. The use of the MG‐ADL as a primary endpoint in clinical trials and in responder threshold analyses to indicate treatment improvement has increased in recent years. MSE using the MG‐ADL shows promise in helping to determine success of treatment and may be the aspirational goal of MG treatment for the future once validated, particularly given the evolving treatment landscape in MG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srikanth Muppidi
- Neurology & Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Nicholas J Silvestri
- Department of Neurology, State University of New York, Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
61
|
Pascuzzi RM, Bodkin CL. Myasthenia Gravis and Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome: New Developments in Diagnosis and Treatment. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2022; 18:3001-3022. [PMID: 36578903 PMCID: PMC9792103 DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s296714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
"Myasthenia Gravis is, like it or not, the neurologist's disease!" (Thomas Richards Johns II, MD Seminars in Neurology 1982). The most common disorders in clinical practice involving defective neuromuscular transmission are myasthenia gravis (MG) and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS). The hallmark of weakness related to malfunction of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) is variability in severity of symptoms from minute to minute and hour to hour. Fatigable weakness and fluctuation in symptoms are common in patients whether the etiology is autoimmune, paraneoplastic, genetic, or toxic. Autoimmune MG is the most common disorder of neuromuscular transmission affecting adults with an estimated prevalence of 1 in 10,000. While LEMS is comparatively rare, the unique clinical presentation, the association with cancer, and evolving treatment strategies require the neurologist to be familiar with its presentation, diagnosis, and management. In this paper we provide a summary of the meaningful recent clinical developments in the diagnosis and treatment of both MG and LEMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert M Pascuzzi
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Cynthia L Bodkin
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Feng X, Song Z, Wu M, Liu Y, Luo S, Zhao C, Zhang W. Efficacy and Safety of Immunotherapies in Refractory Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Neurol 2021; 12:725700. [PMID: 34925206 PMCID: PMC8672452 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.725700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Approximately 10–20% of patients WITH myasthenia gravis (MG) are refractory to conventional immunotherapies. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the optimal therapies for refractory MG. Method: Correlative studies were performed through a search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. The primary outcome was defined by changes in the quantitative myasthenia gravis score (QMG). Secondary outcomes were defined by the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living Scale (MG-ADL), Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) post intervention status, adverse events, and disease exacerbation after treatment. Result: A total of 16 studies were included with 403 patients with refractory MG on therapies with rituximab, eculizumab, tacrolimus, and cladribine. Therapeutic efficacy of rituximab and eculizumab was identified with an estimated reduction in QMG score (4.158 vs. 6.928) and MG-ADL (4.400 vs. 4.344), respectively. No significant changes were revealed in efficacy or exacerbation density between the two independent therapeutic cohorts. The estimated adverse event density of eculizumab was more significant than that in the rituximab group (1.195 vs. 0.134 per patient-year), while the estimated serious event density was similar. Conclusion: The efficacy and safety of rituximab and eculizumab have been approved in patients with refractory MG. Rituximab had a superior safety profile than eculizumab with a lower incidence of adverse events. Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021236818, identifier CRD42021236818.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuelin Feng
- Department of Neurology, East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Department of Neurology, National Key Clinical Department and Key Discipline of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zubiao Song
- Department of Neurology, National Key Clinical Department and Key Discipline of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mengli Wu
- Department of Neurology, National Key Clinical Department and Key Discipline of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yanmei Liu
- Department of Neurology, National Key Clinical Department and Key Discipline of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Sushan Luo
- Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chongbo Zhao
- Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weixi Zhang
- Department of Neurology, National Key Clinical Department and Key Discipline of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Soliris to Stop Immune-Mediated Death in COVID-19 (SOLID-C19)-A Compassionate-Use Study of Terminal Complement Blockade in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19-Related Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Viruses 2021; 13:v13122429. [PMID: 34960699 PMCID: PMC8704457 DOI: 10.3390/v13122429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Eculizumab, a terminal complement (C5)-inhibiting monoclonal antibody, was administered in five mechanically ventilated patients in life-threatening condition due to COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) between 23 March 2020 and 3 April 2020. Their clinical progress was monitored. The primary endpoint was mortality. One patient was excluded while two passed away. The remaining two patients survived. At the time of this study, the mortality rate in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients suffering from ARDS receiving the standard of care as their therapeutic regimen was reportedly as high as 97%. This pilot study demonstrates a 50% mortality rate in patients receiving eculizumab therapy.
Collapse
|
64
|
Monteleone JPR, Gao X, Kleijn HJ, Bellanti F, Pelto R. Eculizumab Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Patients With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis. Front Neurol 2021; 12:696385. [PMID: 34795626 PMCID: PMC8594444 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.696385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and exposure-response of the approved 900/1,200 mg dosing regimen for the terminal complement component 5 (C5) inhibitor eculizumab in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). Methods: The analysis used data from 62 patients aged ≥ 18 years with anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody-positive refractory gMG who received eculizumab during the REGAIN study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01997229). One- and two-compartment population-pharmacokinetic models were evaluated, and the impact of covariates on pharmacokinetic parameters was assessed. Relationships between eculizumab exposure and free C5 concentration, in vitro hemolytic activity, clinical response, and tolerability were characterized. Results: Steady-state serum eculizumab concentrations were achieved by Week 4 and were sustained throughout the 26-week treatment period. The eculizumab pharmacokinetic data were well-described by a two-compartment model with first-order elimination, including effects of body weight on pharmacokinetic parameters and plasma-exchange events on clearance. Complete inhibition of terminal complement was achieved in nearly all patients at the time of trough and peak eculizumab concentrations at all post-dose timepoints assessed (free C5 < 0.5 μg/ml in 92% of patients; in vitro hemolysis < 20% in 87% of patients). Serum eculizumab concentrations of ≥116 μg/ml achieved free C5 concentrations of < 0.5 μg/ml. Clinical efficacy and tolerability were consistent across the eculizumab exposure range. Conclusions: Rigorous, quantitative, model-based exposure-response analysis of serum eculizumab concentration and response data demonstrated that the approved eculizumab dosing (900/1,200 mg) for adults with anti-AChR antibody-positive refractory gMG rapidly achieved complete inhibition of terminal complement activation and provided sustained clinical efficacy across the eculizumab exposure range.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan P. R. Monteleone
- Department of Pharmacometrics, PK/PD M&S, Clinical Development and Translational Sciences, Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Boston, MA, United States
| | - Xiang Gao
- Department of Pharmacometrics, PK/PD M&S, Clinical Development and Translational Sciences, Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Boston, MA, United States
| | | | | | - Ryan Pelto
- Department of Pharmacometrics, PK/PD M&S, Clinical Development and Translational Sciences, Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Lee JD, Woodruff TM. The emerging role of complement in neuromuscular disorders. Semin Immunopathol 2021; 43:817-828. [PMID: 34705082 DOI: 10.1007/s00281-021-00895-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The complement cascade is a key arm of the immune system that protects the host from exogenous and endogenous toxic stimuli through its ability to potently regulate inflammation, phagocytosis, and cell lysis. Due to recent clinical trial successes and drug approvals for complement inhibitors, there is a resurgence in targeting complement as a therapeutic approach to prevent ongoing tissue destruction in several diseases. In particular, neuromuscular diseases are undergoing a recent focus, with demonstrated links between complement activation and disease pathology. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of complement activation and its role during the initiation and progression of neuromuscular disorders including myasthenia gravis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and Duchenne muscular dystrophy. We will review the preclinical and clinical evidence for complement in these diseases, with an emphasis on the complement-targeting drugs in clinical trials for these indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John D Lee
- School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
| | - Trent M Woodruff
- School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.,Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Jeong S, Noh Y, Oh IS, Hong YH, Shin JY. Survival, Prognosis, and Clinical Feature of Refractory Myasthenia Gravis: a 15-year Nationwide Cohort Study. J Korean Med Sci 2021; 36:e242. [PMID: 34636500 PMCID: PMC8506414 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare classic autoimmune disease where immunosuppressant therapies have been successful to reduce MG attributable mortality fairly well. However, patients with refractory MG (rMG) among the actively treated MG (aMG) are nonresponsive to conventional therapy and display high disease severity, which calls for further research. We aimed to determine survival, prognosis, and clinical feature of patients with rMG compared to non-rMG. METHODS Retrospective nationwide cohort study using Korea's healthcare database between 2002 and 2017 was conducted. Patients with rMG (n = 47) and non-rMG (n = 4,251) who were aged > 18 years, followed-up for ≥ 1 year, and prescribed immunosuppressants within 2 years after incident MG diagnosis were included. Patients with rMG were defined as administered plasma exchange or intravenous immunoglobulin at least 3 times per year after receiving ≥ 2 immunosuppressants. All-cause mortality, myasthenic crisis, hospitalization, pneumonia/sepsis, and emergency department (ED) visits were measured using Cox proportional hazard models and pharmacotherapy patterns for rMG were assessed. RESULTS The rMG cohort included a preponderance of younger patients and women. The adjusted hazard ratio was 2.49 (95% confidence interval, 1.26-4.94) for mortality, 3.14 (2.25-4.38) for myasthenic crisis, 1.54 (1.15-2.06) for hospitalization, 2.69 (1.74-4.15) for pneumonia/sepsis, and 1.81 (1.28-2.56) for ED visits for rMG versus non-rMG. The immunosuppressant prescriptions were more prevalent in patients with rMG, while the difference was more remarkable before rMG onset rather than after rMG onset. CONCLUSION Despite the severe prognosis of rMG, the strategies for pharmacotherapeutic regimens were similar in those two groups, suggesting that intensive monitoring and introduction of timely treatment options in the early phase of MG are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sohyun Jeong
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea
- Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yunha Noh
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea
| | - In-Sun Oh
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea
| | - Yoon-Ho Hong
- Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Research Institute, Seoul National University Medical Research Council, Seoul Metropolitan Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ju-Young Shin
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea
- Department of Clinical Research Design & Evaluation, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Siddiqi ZA, Nowak RJ, Mozaffar T, O'Brien F, Yountz M, Patti F. Eculizumab in refractory generalized myasthenia gravis previously treated with rituximab: subgroup analysis of REGAIN and its extension study. Muscle Nerve 2021; 64:662-669. [PMID: 34590717 DOI: 10.1002/mus.27422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/AIMS Individuals with refractory generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) who have a history of rituximab use and experience persistent symptoms represent a population with unmet treatment needs. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eculizumab in patients with refractory anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR+ ) gMG previously treated with rituximab. METHODS This post hoc subgroup analysis of the phase 3 REGAIN study (NCT01997229) and its open-label extension (OLE; NCT02301624) compared baseline characteristics, safety, and response to eculizumab in participants who had previously received rituximab with those who had not. Rituximab use was not permitted within the 6 months before screening or during REGAIN/OLE. RESULTS Of 125 REGAIN participants, 14 had received rituximab previously (7 received placebo and 7 received eculizumab). In the previous-rituximab group, 57% had used at least four other immunosuppressants compared with 16% in the no-previous-rituximab group. Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living total scores from eculizumab baseline to week 130 of eculizumab treatment improved in both the previous-rituximab and no-previous-rituximab groups (least-squares mean -4.4, standard error of the mean [SEM] 1.0 [n = 9] and least-squares mean -4.6, SEM 0.3 [n = 67], respectively; difference = 0.2, 95% confidence interval -1.88 to 2.22). In addition, in both groups, most patients who were treated with eculizumab for 130 weeks achieved a Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America post-intervention status of minimal manifestations (66.7% and 65.0%, respectively). The eculizumab safety profile was similar between groups and consistent with its established profile. DISCUSSION Eculizumab is an effective therapy for patients with refractory AChR+ gMG, irrespective of whether they had received rituximab treatment previously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaeem A Siddiqi
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Richard J Nowak
- Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Tahseen Mozaffar
- Department of Neurology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Fanny O'Brien
- Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marcus Yountz
- Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Francesco Patti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, G.F. Ingrassia, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
68
|
Gallagher GW, Nowacek D, Gutgsell O, Callaghan BC. Comparison of the United Kingdom and United States approaches to approval of new neuromuscular therapies. Muscle Nerve 2021; 64:641-650. [PMID: 34448221 DOI: 10.1002/mus.27380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Revised: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Many novel therapies are now available for rare neuromuscular conditions that were previously untreatable. Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis and spinal muscular atrophy are two examples of diseases with new medications that have transformed our field. The United States and the United Kingdom have taken disparate approaches to the approval and coverage of medications, despite both providing incentives to develop therapies targeting rare diseases. The US requires less evidence for approval when compared with medications for common diseases and does not have a mechanism to ensure or even encourage cost-effectiveness. The Institute of Clinical and Economic Review provides in-depth cost-effectiveness analyses in the US, but does not have the authority to negotiate drug costs. In contrast, the UK has maintained a similar scientific threshold for approval of all therapies, while requiring negotiation with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence to ensure that medications are cost-effective for rare diseases. These differences have led to approval of medications for rare diseases in the US that have less evidence than required for common diseases. Importantly, these medications have not been approved in the UK. Even when medications meet traditional scientific thresholds, they uniformly arrive with high list prices in the US, whereas they are available at cost-effective prices in the UK. The main downsides to the UK approach are that cost-effective medications are often available months later than in the US, and some medications remain unavailable.
Collapse
|
69
|
Xiao H, Wu K, Liang X, Li R, Lai KP. Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Eculizumab for Treating Myasthenia Gravis. Front Immunol 2021; 12:715036. [PMID: 34456922 PMCID: PMC8384962 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.715036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease primarily mediated by acetylcholine receptor antibodies (AChR-Ab), cellular immune dependence, and complement system involvement. Since the AChR on the postsynaptic membrane is destroyed by an immune attack, sufficient endplate potential cannot be generated, resulting in the development of a synaptic transmission disorder at the neuromuscular junction and in muscle weakness. The role of the complement system in MG has been demonstrated in animal models and clinical tests, and it has been determined that complement inhibition in patients with MG can prevent disease induction and reverse its progression. Eculizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits the cleavage of complement protein C5 and prevents autoimmune damage; additionally, it has received subsequent approval by the Federal Drug Administration of the United States for MG treatment. However, various concerns regarding the use of eculizumab persist. In this review, we have discussed the treatment time, cost effectiveness, long-term efficacy, and tolerability of eculizumab for MG treatment. We have also summarized historical information and have presented perspectives on this new therapeutic modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hai Xiao
- Department of Neurology, Guigang City People’s Hospital, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guigang, China
| | - Ka Wu
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second People’s Hospital of Nanning City, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Xiaoliu Liang
- College of Pharmacy, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Rong Li
- Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Integrative Omics, Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China
| | - Keng Po Lai
- Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Integrative Omics, Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Howard JF, Karam C, Yountz M, O’Brien FL, Mozaffar T. Long-term efficacy of eculizumab in refractory generalized myasthenia gravis: responder analyses. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2021; 8:1398-1407. [PMID: 34043280 PMCID: PMC8283175 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Revised: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) is an autoimmune disease that causes disabling weakness via damage to the neuromuscular junction. In most patients, the disease is mediated by autoantibodies to the acetylcholine receptor, which activate the complement cascade. Our objective was to analyze response profiles in adult patients with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive refractory gMG treated with eculizumab-a terminal complement inhibitor-in the REGAIN study or its open-label extension (OLE). METHODS We retrospectively analyzed Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores recorded during REGAIN and its OLE. Early/late responses were defined as improvement in MG-ADL score (≥3 points) or QMG score (≥5 points) at ≤12 or >12 weeks, respectively, after eculizumab initiation. RESULTS The analysis included 98 patients. By Week 12 and conclusion of the OLE, MG-ADL response had been achieved at some point by 67.3% and 84.7% of patients, respectively, and QMG response by 56.1% and 71.4%, respectively. Response was observed over multiple consecutive assessments for most patients. At Week 130, the least-squares mean percentage changes (95% CI) from baseline in MG-ADL score were -61.9% (-69.9%, -53.9%) and -47.5% (-59.0%, -36.0%) in early and late MG-ADL responders, respectively; the least-squares mean percentage changes from baseline in QMG score were -40.8% (-48.3%, -33.4%) and -55.5% (-68.4%, -42.7%) in early and late QMG responders, respectively. INTERPRETATION The findings suggest that, although most patients with refractory gMG will achieve clinical response by Week 12 of eculizumab treatment, first responses can be observed with longer-term treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James F. Howard
- Department of NeurologyThe University of North CarolinaChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Chafic Karam
- Department of NeurologyOregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandOregonUSA
- Present address:
Penn Neuroscience Center ‐ Neurology, Hospital of the University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | | | | | - Tahseen Mozaffar
- Department of NeurologyUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineCaliforniaUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
71
|
Usman U, Chrisman C, Houston D, Haws CC, Wang A, Muley S. The use of eculizumab in ventilator-dependent myasthenia gravis patients. Muscle Nerve 2021; 64:212-215. [PMID: 34008175 DOI: 10.1002/mus.27326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/AIMS Eculizumab has been shown to be efficacious in acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR+ ) Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) class II, III, and IV generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) patients. However, it has not been studied in MGFA class V gMG patients. METHODS We report three AChR+ , refractory, MGFA class V gMG patients treated with eculizumab. MGFA class, MG-Composite (MGC) score and MG Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score were assessed before and after eculizumab. RESULTS Two of three gMG patients, refractory to intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, prednisone, and (in one case) rituximab, showed a robust response to eculizumab with marked improvement in MGFA, MG-ADL, and MGC measures. The third patient showed a partial response to eculizumab but remained on noninvasive ventilation and gastrostomy intubation. Patients 1 and 2 achieved minimal manifestation status at week 4 and week 6, respectively, and showed continued improvement on MG-ADL and MGC scores through weeks 55 and 43, respectively, with eculizumab. The third patient showed a partial response at week 10, followed by a slight decline in his MG-ADL score, but noted a slow but an incomplete improvement afterward on MG-ADL and MGC scores, possibly due to delayed eculizumab infusion. DISCUSSION Eculizumab may play a role in the treatment of patients with MGFA class V, refractory gMG. Larger studies are required to provide further evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uzma Usman
- Department of Neurology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Christina Chrisman
- Department of Neurology, Banner University Medical Centre, Phoenix, AZ, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Drew Houston
- Department of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute. Phoenix. AZ, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Clara Chow Haws
- Department of Neurology, Phoenix Children Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Alan Wang
- Department of Neurology, Banner University Medical Centre, Phoenix, AZ, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Suraj Muley
- Department of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute. Phoenix. AZ, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Fc-Receptor Targeted Therapies for the Treatment of Myasthenia gravis. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22115755. [PMID: 34071155 PMCID: PMC8198115 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22115755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease in which immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies (Abs) bind to acetylcholine receptors (AChR) or to functionally related molecules in the postsynaptic membrane at the neuromuscular junction. IgG crystallizable fragment (Fc)-mediated effector functions, such as antibody-dependent complement deposition, contribute to disease development and progression. Despite progress in understanding Ab-mediated disease mechanisms, immunotherapy of MG remained rather unspecific with corticosteroids and maintenance with immunosuppressants as first choice drugs for most patients. More specific therapeutic IgG Fc-based platforms that reduce serum half-life or effector functions of pathogenic MG-related Abs are currently being developed, tested in clinical trials or have recently been successfully translated into the clinic. In this review, we illustrate mechanisms of action and clinical efficacies of emerging Fc-mediated therapeutics such as neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn)-targeting agents. Furthermore, we evaluate prospects of therapies targeting classical Fc receptors that have shown promising therapeutic efficacy in other antibody-mediated conditions. Increased availability of Fc- and Fc receptor-targeting biologics might foster the development of personalized immunotherapies with the potential to induce sustained disease remission in patients with MG.
Collapse
|
73
|
Costamagna G, Abati E, Bresolin N, Comi GP, Corti S. Management of patients with neuromuscular disorders at the time of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. J Neurol 2021; 268:1580-1591. [PMID: 32804279 PMCID: PMC7429942 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-10149-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The novel Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed several challenges for neuromuscular disorder (NMD) patients. The risk of a severe course of SARS-CoV-2 infection is increased in all but the mildest forms of NMDs. High-risk conditions include reduced airway clearance due to oropharyngeal weakness and risk of worsening with fever, fasting or infection Isolation requirements may have an impact on treatment regimens administered in hospital settings, such as nusinersen, glucosidase alfa, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab infusions. In addition, specific drugs for SARS-CoV2 infection under investigation impair neuromuscular function significantly; chloroquine and azithromycin are not recommended in myasthenia gravis without available ventilatory support and prolonged prone positioning may influence options for treatment. Other therapeutics may affect specific NMDs (metabolic, mitochondrial, myotonic diseases) and experimental approaches for Coronavirus disease 2019 may be offered "compassionately" only after consulting the patient's NMD specialist. In parallel, the reorganization of hospital and outpatient services may change the management of non-infected NMD patients and their caregivers, favouring at-distance approaches. However, the literature on the validation of telehealth in this subgroup of patients is scant. Thus, as the first wave of the pandemic is progressing, clinicians and researchers should address these crucial open issues to ensure adequate caring for NMD patients. This manuscript summarizes available evidence so far and provides guidance for both general neurologists and NMD specialists dealing with NMD patients in the time of COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Costamagna
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (DEPT), Dino Ferrari Centre, University of Milan, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Abati
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (DEPT), Dino Ferrari Centre, University of Milan, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Nereo Bresolin
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (DEPT), Dino Ferrari Centre, University of Milan, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy
- Neurology Unit, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Pietro Comi
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (DEPT), Dino Ferrari Centre, University of Milan, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy
- Neuromuscular and Rare Diseases Unit, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Corti
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (DEPT), Dino Ferrari Centre, University of Milan, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.
- Neurology Unit, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Chronic low-dose intravenous immunoglobulins as steroid-sparing therapy in myasthenia gravis. J Neurol 2021; 268:3871-3877. [PMID: 33829320 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-021-10544-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has been proven beneficial in myasthenic crisis, but their role as maintenance therapy is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine if maintenance therapy with low-dose IVIg improves clinical outcome and may be used as a steroid-sparing agent in myasthenia gravis (MG). METHODS We retrospectively reviewed charts of all MG patients treated with IVIg from January 2006 to December 2019. Long-term treatment response to IVIg was assessed by improvement in the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) clinical classification scale as primary end point, as well as the ability to reduce the time-weighted average required dose of prednisone as secondary end-point, in a follow-up period of 36 months. RESULTS 109 patients were treated with IVIg. The mean follow-up time was 34.03 ± 5.5 months. Sixty-seven patients (61.4%) responded to therapy with at least one-point improvement of the MGFA scale. There was no statistical difference in demographic and clinical characteristics between IVIg responders and non-responders. The mean prednisone dose decreased significantly from 33.1 ± 14.5 mg at baseline to 7.2 ± 7.8 mg after 36 months of IVIg treatment (P < 0.0001), with the greatest effect after 6 months (33.1 ± 14.5 mg Vs. 17.9 ± 11.7 mg; P < 0.0001). In the follow-up period of 36 months, most patients (92.5%) remained clinically and pharmacologically stable under chronic IVIg treatment. CONCLUSION This retrospective study demonstrates that chronic low-dose IVIg treatment in patients with MG improves clinical outcomes and has a prolonged and significant steroid-sparing effect over a period of 3 years.
Collapse
|
75
|
Rodolico C, Nicocia G, Damato V, Antonini G, Liguori R, Evoli A. Benefit and danger from immunotherapy in myasthenia gravis. Neurol Sci 2021; 42:1367-1375. [PMID: 33543421 PMCID: PMC7861968 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-021-05077-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
In the last years, significant advances have improved the knowledge of myasthenia gravis (MG) immunopathogenesis and have enabled to realize new molecules with a selective action targeting compounds of the immunological system. This review discusses emerging treatments for MG, including complement inhibitors, neonatal Fc receptor targeting agents, and B cell interfering drugs, focusing on benefit and danger. In the second section of the review, several related adverse events of immunotherapy, including MGonset, are debated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmelo Rodolico
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Unit of Neurology and Neuromuscular Diseases, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
| | - Giulia Nicocia
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Unit of Neurology and Neuromuscular Diseases, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | | | - Giovanni Antonini
- Department of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sensory Organs (NESMOS), Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Rocco Liguori
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- IRCCS, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Bologna, Italy
| | - Amelia Evoli
- Department of Neurosciences, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Tseng YH, Chen TH. Care for Patients With Neuromuscular Disorders in the COVID-19 Pandemic Era. Front Neurol 2021; 12:607790. [PMID: 33841296 PMCID: PMC8024582 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.607790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has prompted a rapid and unprecedented reorganization of medical institutions, affecting clinical care for patients with chronic neurological diseases. Although there is no evidence that patients with neuromuscular disorders (NMD) confer a higher infection risk of COVID-19, NMD and its associated therapies may affect the patient's ability to cope with infection or its systemic effects. Moreover, there is a concern that patients with chronic NMD may be at increased risk of manifesting severe symptoms of COVID-19. In particular, as respiratory compromises account for the major cause of mortality and morbidity in NMD patients, newly emerging data also show that the risk of exacerbation caused by COVID-19 accumulates in this particular patient group. For example, patients with motor neuron disease and dystrophinopathies often have ventilatory muscle weakness or cardiomyopathy, which may increase the risk of severe COVID-19 infection. Thus, the COVID-19 pandemic may severely affect NMD patients. Several neurological associations and neuromuscular networks have recently guided the impact of COVID-19 on patients with NMD, especially in managing cardiopulmonary involvements. It is recommended that patients with moderate- to high-risk NMD be sophisticatedly monitored to reduce the risk of rapid decline in cardiopulmonary function or potential deterioration of the underlying NMD. However, limited neuromuscular-specific recommendations for NMD patients who contract COVID-19 and outcome data are lacking. There is an urgent need to properly modify the respiratory care method for NMD patients, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusively, COVID-19 is a rapidly evolving field, and the practical guidelines for the management of NMD patients are frequently revised. There must be a close collaboration in a multidisciplinary care team that should support their hospital to define a standardized care method for NMD patients during the COVID pandemic. This article reviews evidence-based practical guidelines regarding care delivery, modification, and education, highlighting the need for team-based and interspecialty collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yung-Hao Tseng
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Emergency, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Tai-Heng Chen
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Emergency, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,School of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Murai H, Suzuki S, Hasebe M, Fukamizu Y, Rodrigues E, Utsugisawa K. Safety and effectiveness of eculizumab in Japanese patients with generalized myasthenia gravis: interim analysis of post-marketing surveillance. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2021; 14:17562864211001995. [PMID: 33796147 PMCID: PMC7970258 DOI: 10.1177/17562864211001995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eculizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeted to terminal complement protein C5, is approved in Japan for treatment of patients with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) whose symptoms are difficult to control with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy or plasmapheresis. METHODS This interim analysis of mandatory post-marketing surveillance in Japan assessed the safety and effectiveness of eculizumab at 26 weeks after treatment initiation in patients with AChR+ gMG. RESULTS Data were available for 40 adult patients in Japan [62.5% (25/40) female; mean age at eculizumab initiation, 51.0 years]. Fifteen patients had a history of thymoma. Six patients were excluded from the effectiveness analysis set due to participation in the open-label extension part of the phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN study [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02301624]. After 26 weeks' follow up, 32 patients (80%) were continuing eculizumab treatment. Adverse drug reactions were reported by seven patients [most frequently headache (n = 3)]. One death was reported during eculizumab treatment (relationship unclear as determined by the treating physician) and there was one death 45 days after the last dose (considered unrelated). No meningococcal infections were reported. Mean (standard deviation) changes from baseline in Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores were -3.7 (2.61) (n = 27) and -5.6 (3.50) (n = 26), respectively, at 12 weeks, and -4.3 (2.72) (n = 26) and -5.6 (4.02) (n = 24), respectively, at 26 weeks. Improvements in MG-ADL and QMG scores were generally similar in patients with/without a history of thymoma. Frequency of IVIg use decreased following eculizumab initiation. CONCLUSION In a real-world setting, eculizumab was effective and well tolerated for the treatment of AChR+ gMG in adult Japanese patients whose disease was refractory to IVIg or plasmapheresis. These findings are consistent with the efficacy and safety results from the global phase III REGAIN study of eculizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroyuki Murai
- Department of Neurology, International
University of Health and Welfare, 852 Hatakeda, Narita 286-8520, Japan
| | - Shigeaki Suzuki
- Department of Neurology, Keio University School
of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Miki Hasebe
- Amgen KK, Tokyo, Japan; formerly of Alexion
Pharma GK, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
78
|
Vu T, Harvey B, Suresh N, Farias J, Gooch C. Eculizumab during Pregnancy in a Patient with Treatment-Refractory Myasthenia Gravis: A Case Report. Case Rep Neurol 2021; 13:65-72. [PMID: 33708096 PMCID: PMC7923701 DOI: 10.1159/000511957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody eculizumab has been shown to be effective and well tolerated in patients with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive, treatment-refractory generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). Myasthenia gravis (MG) often affects women of child-bearing potential. However, management can be challenging during pregnancy, and current treatment options are limited due to potential teratogenicity. Data are currently lacking on the use of eculizumab in pregnant women with gMG. This case report describes a successful pregnancy in a young woman with treatment-refractory gMG treated with eculizumab before, during, and after pregnancy. Eculizumab appeared to have a favorable benefit-risk profile in this setting, with no treatment-related adverse effects noted in either the patient or the neonate. The patient remains neurologically stable on eculizumab, which she has now been receiving for 5 years. This first report of the use of eculizumab during pregnancy in a patient with treatment-refractory gMG suggests a potential role for eculizumab in this setting, although further clinical experience is necessary to support its use during pregnancy in women with MG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuan Vu
- Department of Neurology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Brittany Harvey
- Department of Neurology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Niraja Suresh
- Department of Neurology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Jerrica Farias
- Department of Neurology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Clifton Gooch
- Department of Neurology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Katyal N, Narula N, Govindarajan R. Clinical Experience with Eculizumab in Treatment-Refractory Acetylcholine Receptor Antibody-Positive Generalized Myasthenia Gravis. J Neuromuscul Dis 2021; 8:287-294. [PMID: 33325394 PMCID: PMC8075396 DOI: 10.3233/jnd-200584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background: Although established therapies are effective in most patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), some patients do not respond or they experience intolerable adverse events, highlighting the need for better tolerated, targeted therapies for treatment-refractory gMG. Objective: To describe real-world experience with eculizumab in patients with treatment-refractory acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR+) gMG. Methods: Retrospective chart review of 15 patients with treatment-refractory AChR+ gMG treated for 12 months with eculizumab (900 mg/week for 4 weeks then 1200 mg every 2 weeks). Outcome measures were Myasthenia Gravis–Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scores, number of exacerbations, single-breath count test (SBCT) score, medication changes, selected Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) evaluations, and adverse events. Data collected at 3-monthly intervals for 12 months before and after eculizumab initiation were analyzed. Results: Clinically meaningful reductions in total MG-ADL scores were observed at 3 months following eculizumab initiation and maintained up to 12 months in all patients. After 12 months’ eculizumab treatment, there was a significant reduction in the number of acute exacerbations; mean (SD) SBCT score improved from 28.13 (0.33) to 50.26 (2.86); all patients achieved a ‘none’ or ‘mild’ rating for QMG evaluations; all patients reduced their daily prednisone dose; and nine patients had discontinued pyridostigmine. At the end of treatment, intravenous immunoglobulin was discontinued in all six patients receiving this therapy at eculizumab initiation. Eculizumab was well tolerated. Conclusions: This real-world study demonstrated improvement in outcome measures and decreased concomitant drug requirement within 12 months of eculizumab initiation in patients with treatment-refractory AChR+ gMG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nakul Katyal
- University of Missouri Health Care, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Naureen Narula
- University of Missouri Health Care, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
80
|
Howard JF, Nowak RJ, Wolfe GI, Freimer ML, Vu TH, Hinton JL, Benatar M, Duda PW, MacDougall JE, Farzaneh-Far R, Kaminski HJ, Barohn R, Dimachkie M, Pasnoor M, Farmakidis C, Liu T, Colgan S, Benatar MG, Bertorini T, Pillai R, Henegar R, Bromberg M, Gibson S, Janecki T, Freimer M, Elsheikh B, Matisak P, Genge A, Guidon A, David W, Habib AA, Mathew V, Mozaffar T, Hinton JL, Hewitt W, Barnett D, Sullivan P, Ho D, Howard JF, Traub RE, Chopra M, Kaminski HJ, Aly R, Bayat E, Abu-Rub M, Khan S, Lange D, Holzberg S, Khatri B, Lindman E, Olapo T, Sershon LM, Lisak RP, Bernitsas E, Jia K, Malik R, Lewis-Collins TD, Nicolle M, Nowak RJ, Sharma A, Roy B, Nye J, Pulley M, Berger A, Shabbir Y, Sachdev A, Patterson K, Siddiqi Z, Sivak M, Bratton J, Small G, Kohli A, Fetter M, Vu T, Lam L, Harvey B, Wolfe GI, Silvestri N, Patrick K, Zakalik K, Duda PW, MacDougall J, Farzaneh-Far R, Pontius A, Hoarty M. Clinical Effects of the Self-administered Subcutaneous Complement Inhibitor Zilucoplan in Patients With Moderate to Severe Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: Results of a Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol 2021; 77:582-592. [PMID: 32065623 PMCID: PMC7042797 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.5125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Question What are the clinical effects of zilucoplan, a subcutaneously self-administered macrocyclic peptide inhibitor of complement component 5, in a broad population of patients with moderate to severe acetylcholine receptor autoantibody–positive generalized myasthenia gravis? Findings In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase 2 trial, zilucoplan yielded rapid, clinically meaningful, statistically significant, and sustained improvements in the primary and key secondary end points. Near-complete complement inhibition was associated with a faster onset and greater magnitude of benefit than submaximal complement inhibition, and favorable safety and tolerability were observed. Meaning The findings support a potential therapeutic role for zilucoplan in generalized myasthenia gravis and further evaluation in a phase 3 study. Importance Many patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) have substantial clinical disability, persistent disease burden, and adverse effects attributable to chronic immunosuppression. Therefore, there is a significant need for targeted, well-tolerated therapies with the potential to improve disease control and enhance quality of life. Objective To evaluate the clinical effects of zilucoplan, a subcutaneously (SC) self-administered macrocyclic peptide inhibitor of complement component 5, in a broad population of patients with moderate to severe gMG. Design, Setting, and Participants This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial at 25 study sites across North America recruited participants between December 2017 and August 2018. Fifty-seven patients were screened, of whom 12 did not meet inclusion criteria and 1 was lost to follow-up after randomization but before receiving study drug, resulting in a total of 44 acetylcholine receptor autoantibody (AChR-Ab)–positive patients with gMG with baseline Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores of at least 12, regardless of treatment history. Interventions Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to a daily SC self-injection of placebo, 0.1-mg/kg zilucoplan, or 0.3-mg/kg zilucoplan for 12 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary and key secondary end points were the change from baseline to week 12 in QMG and MG Activities of Daily Living scores, respectively. Significance testing was prespecified at a 1-sided α of .10. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. Results The study of 44 patients was well balanced across the 3 treatment arms with respect to key demographic and disease-specific variables. The mean age of patients across all 3 treatment groups ranged from 45.5 to 54.6 years and most patients were white (average proportions across 3 treatment groups: 78.6%-86.7%). Clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements in primary and key secondary efficacy end points were observed. Zilucoplan at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg SC daily resulted in a mean reduction from baseline of 6.0 points in the QMG score (placebo-corrected change, –2.8; P = .05) and 3.4 points in the MG Activities of Daily Living score (placebo-corrected change, –2.3; P = .04). Clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements were also observed in other secondary end points, the MG Composite and MG Quality-of-Life scores. Outcomes for the 0.1-mg/kg SC daily dose were also statistically significant but slower in onset and less pronounced than with the 0.3-mg/kg dose. Rescue therapy (intravenous immunoglobulin or plasma exchange) was required in 3 of 15, 1 of 15, and 0 of 14 participants in the placebo, 0.1-mg/kg zilucoplan, and 0.3-mg/kg zilucoplan arms, respectively. Zilucoplan was observed to have a favorable safety and tolerability profile. Conclusions and Relevance Zilucoplan yielded rapid, meaningful, and sustained improvements over 12 weeks in a broad population of patients with moderate to severe AChR-Ab–positive gMG. Near-complete complement inhibition appeared superior to submaximal inhibition. The observed safety and tolerability profile of zilucoplan was favorable. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03315130.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Petra W Duda
- Ra Pharmaceuticals Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Angela Genge
- Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Doreen Ho
- Lahey Hospital, Burlington, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | | | - Radwa Aly
- George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Elham Bayat
- George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | | | - Shaida Khan
- University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Irving
| | - Dale Lange
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | | | - Bhupendra Khatri
- Center for Neurological Disorders, St Francis Hospital at Ascension, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Emily Lindman
- Center for Neurological Disorders, St Francis Hospital at Ascension, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Tayo Olapo
- Center for Neurological Disorders, St Francis Hospital at Ascension, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Lisa M Sershon
- Center for Neurological Disorders, St Francis Hospital at Ascension, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | | | | | - Kelly Jia
- Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Bhaskar Roy
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Joan Nye
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mark Sivak
- Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | | | - George Small
- Allegheny Neurological Associates, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Anem Kohli
- Allegheny Neurological Associates, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mary Fetter
- Allegheny Neurological Associates, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Tuan Vu
- University of South Florida, Tampa
| | - Lucy Lam
- University of South Florida, Tampa
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Petra W Duda
- Ra Pharmaceuticals Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
81
|
Pignataro G, Cataldi M, Taglialatela M. Neurological risks and benefits of cytokine-based treatments in coronavirus disease 2019: from preclinical to clinical evidence. Br J Pharmacol 2021; 179:2149-2174. [PMID: 33512003 DOI: 10.1111/bph.15397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunodeficiency and hyperinflammation are responsible for the most frequent and life-threatening forms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Therefore, cytokine-based treatments targeting immuno-inflammatory mechanisms are currently undergoing clinical scrutiny in COVID-19-affected patients. In addition, COVID-19 patients also exhibit a wide range of neurological manifestations (neuro-COVID), which may also benefit from cytokine-based treatments. In fact, such drugs have shown some clinical efficacy also in neuroinflammatory diseases. On the other hand, anti-cytokine drugs are endowed with significant neurological risks, mainly attributable to their immunodepressant effects. Therefore, the aim of the present manuscript is to briefly describe the role of specific cytokines in neuroinflammation, to summarize the efficacy in preclinical models of neuroinflammatory diseases of drugs targeting these cytokines and to review the clinical data regarding the neurological effects of these drugs currently being investigated against COVID-19, in order to raise awareness about their potentially beneficial and/or detrimental neurological consequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Pignataro
- Division of Pharmacology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Mauro Cataldi
- Division of Pharmacology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Maurizio Taglialatela
- Division of Pharmacology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Bennani HN, Lagrange E, Noble J, Malvezzi P, Motte L, Chevallier E, Rostaing L, Jouve T. Treatment of refractory myasthenia gravis by double-filtration plasmapheresis and rituximab: A case series of nine patients and literature review. J Clin Apher 2020; 36:348-363. [PMID: 33349954 DOI: 10.1002/jca.21868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease mediated by circulating autoantibodies (anti-AchR, anti-MuSK, etc.). More than 20% of myasthenic patients are refractory to conventional treatments (plasma exchange, IVIg, steroids, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil). Rituximab (B-lymphocyte-depleting anti-CD20) and apheresis (double-filtration plasmapheresis [DFPP] and immunoadsorption [IA]) are interesting therapeutic alternatives. METHODS This monocentric pilot study included nine refractory myasthenic patients (March 2018 to May 2020) treated by DFPP and/or IA associated with rituximab (375 mg/m2 ). Clinical responses were assessed using the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) score. RESULTS Average age of patients was 53 ± 17 years. Gender ratio (M/F) was 3:6. The combination of apheresis and rituximab reduced median MGFA score from IV to II after 12 months of follow-up. Clinical improvement assessed by MGFA score was sustained in the long-term for all patients, during an average follow-up of 14 ± 9 months, allowing them to be self-sufficient and out sick-leave. The median number of apheresis sessions was 7 (5-30). The dose of prednisolone was reduced in two patients from 40 mg/d and 30 mg/d to 7.5 mg/d and 10 mg/d, respectively. It was stopped in a patient who was taking 30 mg/d. No infectious, bleeding, or thrombosis complications were noted. CONCLUSION The combination of rituximab and DFPP was effective to treat refractory MG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamza N Bennani
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation Rénale, CHU Grenoble, La Tronche, France
| | - Emmeline Lagrange
- Exploration Fonctionnelle du Système Nerveux instead of Service de Neurologie, CHU Grenoble, La Tronche, France
| | - Johan Noble
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation Rénale, CHU Grenoble, La Tronche, France
| | - Paolo Malvezzi
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation Rénale, CHU Grenoble, La Tronche, France
| | - Lionel Motte
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation Rénale, CHU Grenoble, La Tronche, France
| | - Eloi Chevallier
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation Rénale, CHU Grenoble, La Tronche, France
| | - Lionel Rostaing
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation Rénale, CHU Grenoble, La Tronche, France.,Université Grenoble-Alpes, La Tronche, France
| | - Thomas Jouve
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation Rénale, CHU Grenoble, La Tronche, France.,Université Grenoble-Alpes, La Tronche, France
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Nowak RJ, Muppidi S, Beydoun SR, O'Brien FL, Yountz M, Howard JF. Concomitant Immunosuppressive Therapy Use in Eculizumab-Treated Adults With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis During the REGAIN Open-Label Extension Study. Front Neurol 2020; 11:556104. [PMID: 33329303 PMCID: PMC7732596 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.556104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic, broad-spectrum immunosuppressive therapy (IST) can be associated with side effects in many people with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), and treatment guidelines recommend that the IST dose be tapered once patients achieve a stable treatment response. We therefore examined IST use in eculizumab-treated patients with refractory gMG. Methods: The REGAIN open-label extension (OLE) enrolled 117 adults with refractory anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive gMG who had completed the 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN study of eculizumab. Eligible patients had received ≥2 ISTs for ≥1 year or ≥1 IST with intravenous immunoglobulin or plasma exchange ≥4 times in 1 year, without symptom control. During REGAIN, changes in concomitant MG therapies were not permitted; during the OLE, they were permitted at the investigators' discretion. Participants received eculizumab 1,200 mg every 2 weeks for up to 4 years; concomitant prednisone and related corticosteroids (PRED), azathioprine (AZA), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) use was recorded. Changes in MG Activities of Daily Living and Quantitative MG total scores, MG exacerbations, and adverse events were also recorded. Results: At last OLE assessment, 88.0% (103/117) of participants were using ≥1 IST vs. 98.3% (115/117) at OLE baseline. During the OLE, 76.9% (90/117) of patients experienced a total of 719 IST changes. Almost half of participants [48.7% (57/117)] stopped or decreased ≥1 IST owing to MG symptom improvement, representing 38.9% (280/719) of all changes. In patients who decreased and/or stopped ≥1 IST, mean daily doses of PRED, AZA, and MMF decreased between OLE baseline and last assessment by 60.8% [standard deviation (SD), 28.07; P < 0.0001], 89.1% (SD, 25.77; P < 0.0001), and 56.0% (SD, 32.99; P < 0.0001), respectively. Improved clinical outcomes were observed with eculizumab regardless of IST changes during the OLE, and eculizumab's safety profile was similar in patients who used PRED, AZA, and MMF. Conclusions: Use of ISTs by patients with previously refractory gMG decreased during eculizumab treatment in the REGAIN OLE. Clinical improvements with eculizumab were maintained by patients in all groups, including those who decreased and/or stopped concomitant ISTs. Trial registration:www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01997229, NCT02301624.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Nowak
- Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Srikanth Muppidi
- Department of Neurology and Neurosciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Said R Beydoun
- Department of Neurology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | | | | | - James F Howard
- Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Mantegazza R, Vanoli F, Frangiamore R, Cavalcante P. Complement Inhibition for the Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis. Immunotargets Ther 2020; 9:317-331. [PMID: 33365280 PMCID: PMC7751298 DOI: 10.2147/itt.s261414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) is a rare autoimmune disorder affecting the neuromuscular junction (NMJ). Approximately 80-90% of patients display antibodies directed against the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR). A major drive of AChR antibody-positive MG pathology is represented by complement activation. The role of the complement cascade has been largely demonstrated in patients and in MG animal models. Complement activation at the NMJ leads to focal lysis of the post-synaptic membrane, disruption of the characteristic folds, and reduction of AChR. Given that the complement system works as an activation cascade, there are many potential targets that can be considered for therapeutic intervention. Preclinical studies have confirmed the efficacy of complement inhibition in ameliorating MG symptoms. Eculizumab, an antibody directed towards C5, has recently been approved for the treatment of AChR antibody-positive gMG. Other complement inhibitors, targeting C5 as well, are currently under phase III study. Complement inhibitors, however, may present prohibitive costs. Therefore, the identification of a subset of patients more or less prone to respond to such therapies would be beneficial. For such purpose, there is a critical need to identify possible biomarkers predictive of therapeutic response, a field not yet sufficiently explored in MG. This review aims to give an overview of the complement cascade involvement in MG, the evolution of complement-inhibiting therapies and possible biomarkers useful to tailor and monitor complement-directed therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renato Mantegazza
- Neurology IV - Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Diseases Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Fiammetta Vanoli
- Neurology IV - Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Diseases Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Rita Frangiamore
- Neurology IV - Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Diseases Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Cavalcante
- Neurology IV - Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Diseases Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
85
|
Valencia-Sanchez C, Wingerchuk DM. Emerging Targeted Therapies for Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders. BioDrugs 2020; 35:7-17. [PMID: 33301078 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-020-00460-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an autoimmune, inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system that typically presents with recurrent episodes of optic neuritis, longitudinally extensive myelitis, brainstem, diencephalic, and cerebral syndromes. Up to 80% of NMOSD patients have a circulating pathogenic autoantibody that targets the water channel aquaporin-4 (AQP4-IgG). The discovery of AQP4-IgG transformed our understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease and its possible treatment targets. Monoclonal antibodies targeting terminal complement (eculizumab), CD19 (inebilizumab), and the interleukin-6 receptor (satralizumab) have demonstrated efficacy in NMOSD attack prevention in recent phase 3 trials and have gained subsequent regulatory approval in the USA and other countries. We aim to review the evidence supporting the efficacy of these new drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dean M Wingerchuk
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 East Shea Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Mantegazza R, Wolfe GI, Muppidi S, Wiendl H, Fujita KP, O'Brien FL, Booth HDE, Howard JF. Post-intervention Status in Patients With Refractory Myasthenia Gravis Treated With Eculizumab During REGAIN and Its Open-Label Extension. Neurology 2020; 96:e610-e618. [PMID: 33229455 PMCID: PMC7905790 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000011207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate whether eculizumab helps patients with anti–acetylcholine receptor–positive (AChR+) refractory generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) achieve the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) post-intervention status of minimal manifestations (MM), we assessed patients' status throughout REGAIN (Safety and Efficacy of Eculizumab in AChR+ Refractory Generalized Myasthenia Gravis) and its open-label extension. Methods Patients who completed the REGAIN randomized controlled trial and continued into the open-label extension were included in this tertiary endpoint analysis. Patients were assessed for the MGFA post-intervention status of improved, unchanged, worse, MM, and pharmacologic remission at defined time points during REGAIN and through week 130 of the open-label study. Results A total of 117 patients completed REGAIN and continued into the open-label study (eculizumab/eculizumab: 56; placebo/eculizumab: 61). At week 26 of REGAIN, more eculizumab-treated patients than placebo-treated patients achieved a status of improved (60.7% vs 41.7%) or MM (25.0% vs 13.3%; common OR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.1–4.5). After 130 weeks of eculizumab treatment, 88.0% of patients achieved improved status and 57.3% of patients achieved MM status. The safety profile of eculizumab was consistent with its known profile and no new safety signals were detected. Conclusion Eculizumab led to rapid and sustained achievement of MM in patients with AChR+ refractory gMG. These findings support the use of eculizumab in this previously difficult-to-treat patient population. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier REGAIN, NCT01997229; REGAIN open-label extension, NCT02301624. Classification of Evidence This study provides Class II evidence that, after 26 weeks of eculizumab treatment, 25.0% of adults with AChR+ refractory gMG achieved MM, compared with 13.3% who received placebo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renato Mantegazza
- From the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta (R.M.), Milan, Italy; Department of Neurology (G.I.W.), Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (S.M.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA; Department of Neurology (H.W.), University of Münster, Germany; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals (K.P.F.), Cambridge, MA; Alexion Pharmaceuticals (F.L.O.), Boston, MA; Oxford PharmaGenesis (H.D.E.B.), UK; and Department of Neurology (J.F.H.), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. K.P.F. was formerly affiliated with Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA
| | - Gil I Wolfe
- From the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta (R.M.), Milan, Italy; Department of Neurology (G.I.W.), Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (S.M.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA; Department of Neurology (H.W.), University of Münster, Germany; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals (K.P.F.), Cambridge, MA; Alexion Pharmaceuticals (F.L.O.), Boston, MA; Oxford PharmaGenesis (H.D.E.B.), UK; and Department of Neurology (J.F.H.), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. K.P.F. was formerly affiliated with Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA
| | - Srikanth Muppidi
- From the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta (R.M.), Milan, Italy; Department of Neurology (G.I.W.), Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (S.M.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA; Department of Neurology (H.W.), University of Münster, Germany; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals (K.P.F.), Cambridge, MA; Alexion Pharmaceuticals (F.L.O.), Boston, MA; Oxford PharmaGenesis (H.D.E.B.), UK; and Department of Neurology (J.F.H.), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. K.P.F. was formerly affiliated with Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA
| | - Heinz Wiendl
- From the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta (R.M.), Milan, Italy; Department of Neurology (G.I.W.), Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (S.M.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA; Department of Neurology (H.W.), University of Münster, Germany; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals (K.P.F.), Cambridge, MA; Alexion Pharmaceuticals (F.L.O.), Boston, MA; Oxford PharmaGenesis (H.D.E.B.), UK; and Department of Neurology (J.F.H.), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. K.P.F. was formerly affiliated with Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA
| | - Kenji P Fujita
- From the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta (R.M.), Milan, Italy; Department of Neurology (G.I.W.), Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (S.M.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA; Department of Neurology (H.W.), University of Münster, Germany; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals (K.P.F.), Cambridge, MA; Alexion Pharmaceuticals (F.L.O.), Boston, MA; Oxford PharmaGenesis (H.D.E.B.), UK; and Department of Neurology (J.F.H.), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. K.P.F. was formerly affiliated with Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA
| | - Fanny L O'Brien
- From the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta (R.M.), Milan, Italy; Department of Neurology (G.I.W.), Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (S.M.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA; Department of Neurology (H.W.), University of Münster, Germany; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals (K.P.F.), Cambridge, MA; Alexion Pharmaceuticals (F.L.O.), Boston, MA; Oxford PharmaGenesis (H.D.E.B.), UK; and Department of Neurology (J.F.H.), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. K.P.F. was formerly affiliated with Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA
| | - Heather D E Booth
- From the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta (R.M.), Milan, Italy; Department of Neurology (G.I.W.), Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (S.M.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA; Department of Neurology (H.W.), University of Münster, Germany; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals (K.P.F.), Cambridge, MA; Alexion Pharmaceuticals (F.L.O.), Boston, MA; Oxford PharmaGenesis (H.D.E.B.), UK; and Department of Neurology (J.F.H.), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. K.P.F. was formerly affiliated with Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA
| | - James F Howard
- From the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta (R.M.), Milan, Italy; Department of Neurology (G.I.W.), Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (S.M.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA; Department of Neurology (H.W.), University of Münster, Germany; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals (K.P.F.), Cambridge, MA; Alexion Pharmaceuticals (F.L.O.), Boston, MA; Oxford PharmaGenesis (H.D.E.B.), UK; and Department of Neurology (J.F.H.), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. K.P.F. was formerly affiliated with Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
87
|
Narayanaswami P, Sanders DB, Wolfe G, Benatar M, Cea G, Evoli A, Gilhus NE, Illa I, Kuntz NL, Massey J, Melms A, Murai H, Nicolle M, Palace J, Richman D, Verschuuren J. International Consensus Guidance for Management of Myasthenia Gravis: 2020 Update. Neurology 2020; 96:114-122. [PMID: 33144515 PMCID: PMC7884987 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000011124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 277] [Impact Index Per Article: 69.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To update the 2016 formal consensus-based guidance for the management of myasthenia gravis (MG) based on the latest evidence in the literature. Methods In October 2013, the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America appointed a Task Force to develop treatment guidance for MG, and a panel of 15 international experts was convened. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method was used to develop consensus recommendations pertaining to 7 treatment topics. In February 2019, the international panel was reconvened with the addition of one member to represent South America. All previous recommendations were reviewed for currency, and new consensus recommendations were developed on topics that required inclusion or updates based on the recent literature. Up to 3 rounds of anonymous e-mail votes were used to reach consensus, with modifications to recommendations between rounds based on the panel input. A simple majority vote (80% of panel members voting “yes”) was used to approve minor changes in grammar and syntax to improve clarity. Results The previous recommendations for thymectomy were updated. New recommendations were developed for the use of rituximab, eculizumab, and methotrexate as well as for the following topics: early immunosuppression in ocular MG and MG associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Conclusion This updated formal consensus guidance of international MG experts, based on new evidence, provides recommendations to clinicians caring for patients with MG worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pushpa Narayanaswami
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (P.N.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (D.B.S., J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (G.W.), Univ. at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine. Miami, FL; Gabriel Cea (G.C.), Departamento de Ciencias Neurologicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Dipartimento di Neuroscienze (A.E.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Department of Clinical Medicine (N.E.G.), University of Bergen, Norway; Isabel Illa (I.I.), Department of Neurology, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, ERN EURO-NMD and CIBERER U762, Spain; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (N.L.K.), Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; Neurology (A.M.), University of Tübingen Medical Centre, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Neurology (H.M.), International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan; Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences (M.N.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurology (J.P.), John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (D.R.), University of California, Davis, Davis, CA; and Department of Neurology (J.V.), Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Donald B Sanders
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (P.N.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (D.B.S., J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (G.W.), Univ. at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine. Miami, FL; Gabriel Cea (G.C.), Departamento de Ciencias Neurologicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Dipartimento di Neuroscienze (A.E.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Department of Clinical Medicine (N.E.G.), University of Bergen, Norway; Isabel Illa (I.I.), Department of Neurology, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, ERN EURO-NMD and CIBERER U762, Spain; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (N.L.K.), Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; Neurology (A.M.), University of Tübingen Medical Centre, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Neurology (H.M.), International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan; Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences (M.N.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurology (J.P.), John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (D.R.), University of California, Davis, Davis, CA; and Department of Neurology (J.V.), Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Gil Wolfe
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (P.N.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (D.B.S., J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (G.W.), Univ. at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine. Miami, FL; Gabriel Cea (G.C.), Departamento de Ciencias Neurologicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Dipartimento di Neuroscienze (A.E.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Department of Clinical Medicine (N.E.G.), University of Bergen, Norway; Isabel Illa (I.I.), Department of Neurology, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, ERN EURO-NMD and CIBERER U762, Spain; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (N.L.K.), Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; Neurology (A.M.), University of Tübingen Medical Centre, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Neurology (H.M.), International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan; Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences (M.N.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurology (J.P.), John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (D.R.), University of California, Davis, Davis, CA; and Department of Neurology (J.V.), Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Michael Benatar
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (P.N.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (D.B.S., J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (G.W.), Univ. at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine. Miami, FL; Gabriel Cea (G.C.), Departamento de Ciencias Neurologicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Dipartimento di Neuroscienze (A.E.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Department of Clinical Medicine (N.E.G.), University of Bergen, Norway; Isabel Illa (I.I.), Department of Neurology, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, ERN EURO-NMD and CIBERER U762, Spain; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (N.L.K.), Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; Neurology (A.M.), University of Tübingen Medical Centre, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Neurology (H.M.), International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan; Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences (M.N.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurology (J.P.), John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (D.R.), University of California, Davis, Davis, CA; and Department of Neurology (J.V.), Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Gabriel Cea
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (P.N.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (D.B.S., J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (G.W.), Univ. at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine. Miami, FL; Gabriel Cea (G.C.), Departamento de Ciencias Neurologicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Dipartimento di Neuroscienze (A.E.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Department of Clinical Medicine (N.E.G.), University of Bergen, Norway; Isabel Illa (I.I.), Department of Neurology, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, ERN EURO-NMD and CIBERER U762, Spain; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (N.L.K.), Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; Neurology (A.M.), University of Tübingen Medical Centre, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Neurology (H.M.), International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan; Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences (M.N.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurology (J.P.), John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (D.R.), University of California, Davis, Davis, CA; and Department of Neurology (J.V.), Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Amelia Evoli
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (P.N.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (D.B.S., J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (G.W.), Univ. at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine. Miami, FL; Gabriel Cea (G.C.), Departamento de Ciencias Neurologicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Dipartimento di Neuroscienze (A.E.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Department of Clinical Medicine (N.E.G.), University of Bergen, Norway; Isabel Illa (I.I.), Department of Neurology, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, ERN EURO-NMD and CIBERER U762, Spain; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (N.L.K.), Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; Neurology (A.M.), University of Tübingen Medical Centre, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Neurology (H.M.), International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan; Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences (M.N.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurology (J.P.), John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (D.R.), University of California, Davis, Davis, CA; and Department of Neurology (J.V.), Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Nils Erik Gilhus
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (P.N.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (D.B.S., J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (G.W.), Univ. at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine. Miami, FL; Gabriel Cea (G.C.), Departamento de Ciencias Neurologicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Dipartimento di Neuroscienze (A.E.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Department of Clinical Medicine (N.E.G.), University of Bergen, Norway; Isabel Illa (I.I.), Department of Neurology, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, ERN EURO-NMD and CIBERER U762, Spain; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (N.L.K.), Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; Neurology (A.M.), University of Tübingen Medical Centre, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Neurology (H.M.), International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan; Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences (M.N.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurology (J.P.), John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (D.R.), University of California, Davis, Davis, CA; and Department of Neurology (J.V.), Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Isabel Illa
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (P.N.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (D.B.S., J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (G.W.), Univ. at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine. Miami, FL; Gabriel Cea (G.C.), Departamento de Ciencias Neurologicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Dipartimento di Neuroscienze (A.E.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Department of Clinical Medicine (N.E.G.), University of Bergen, Norway; Isabel Illa (I.I.), Department of Neurology, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, ERN EURO-NMD and CIBERER U762, Spain; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (N.L.K.), Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; Neurology (A.M.), University of Tübingen Medical Centre, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Neurology (H.M.), International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan; Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences (M.N.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurology (J.P.), John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (D.R.), University of California, Davis, Davis, CA; and Department of Neurology (J.V.), Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Nancy L Kuntz
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (P.N.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (D.B.S., J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (G.W.), Univ. at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine. Miami, FL; Gabriel Cea (G.C.), Departamento de Ciencias Neurologicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Dipartimento di Neuroscienze (A.E.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Department of Clinical Medicine (N.E.G.), University of Bergen, Norway; Isabel Illa (I.I.), Department of Neurology, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, ERN EURO-NMD and CIBERER U762, Spain; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (N.L.K.), Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; Neurology (A.M.), University of Tübingen Medical Centre, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Neurology (H.M.), International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan; Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences (M.N.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurology (J.P.), John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (D.R.), University of California, Davis, Davis, CA; and Department of Neurology (J.V.), Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Janice Massey
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (P.N.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (D.B.S., J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (G.W.), Univ. at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine. Miami, FL; Gabriel Cea (G.C.), Departamento de Ciencias Neurologicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Dipartimento di Neuroscienze (A.E.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Department of Clinical Medicine (N.E.G.), University of Bergen, Norway; Isabel Illa (I.I.), Department of Neurology, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, ERN EURO-NMD and CIBERER U762, Spain; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (N.L.K.), Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; Neurology (A.M.), University of Tübingen Medical Centre, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Neurology (H.M.), International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan; Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences (M.N.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurology (J.P.), John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (D.R.), University of California, Davis, Davis, CA; and Department of Neurology (J.V.), Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Arthur Melms
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (P.N.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (D.B.S., J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (G.W.), Univ. at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine. Miami, FL; Gabriel Cea (G.C.), Departamento de Ciencias Neurologicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Dipartimento di Neuroscienze (A.E.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Department of Clinical Medicine (N.E.G.), University of Bergen, Norway; Isabel Illa (I.I.), Department of Neurology, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, ERN EURO-NMD and CIBERER U762, Spain; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (N.L.K.), Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; Neurology (A.M.), University of Tübingen Medical Centre, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Neurology (H.M.), International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan; Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences (M.N.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurology (J.P.), John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (D.R.), University of California, Davis, Davis, CA; and Department of Neurology (J.V.), Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Hiroyuki Murai
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (P.N.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (D.B.S., J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (G.W.), Univ. at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine. Miami, FL; Gabriel Cea (G.C.), Departamento de Ciencias Neurologicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Dipartimento di Neuroscienze (A.E.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Department of Clinical Medicine (N.E.G.), University of Bergen, Norway; Isabel Illa (I.I.), Department of Neurology, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, ERN EURO-NMD and CIBERER U762, Spain; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (N.L.K.), Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; Neurology (A.M.), University of Tübingen Medical Centre, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Neurology (H.M.), International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan; Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences (M.N.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurology (J.P.), John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (D.R.), University of California, Davis, Davis, CA; and Department of Neurology (J.V.), Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Michael Nicolle
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (P.N.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (D.B.S., J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (G.W.), Univ. at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine. Miami, FL; Gabriel Cea (G.C.), Departamento de Ciencias Neurologicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Dipartimento di Neuroscienze (A.E.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Department of Clinical Medicine (N.E.G.), University of Bergen, Norway; Isabel Illa (I.I.), Department of Neurology, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, ERN EURO-NMD and CIBERER U762, Spain; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (N.L.K.), Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; Neurology (A.M.), University of Tübingen Medical Centre, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Neurology (H.M.), International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan; Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences (M.N.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurology (J.P.), John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (D.R.), University of California, Davis, Davis, CA; and Department of Neurology (J.V.), Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline Palace
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (P.N.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (D.B.S., J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (G.W.), Univ. at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine. Miami, FL; Gabriel Cea (G.C.), Departamento de Ciencias Neurologicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Dipartimento di Neuroscienze (A.E.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Department of Clinical Medicine (N.E.G.), University of Bergen, Norway; Isabel Illa (I.I.), Department of Neurology, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, ERN EURO-NMD and CIBERER U762, Spain; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (N.L.K.), Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; Neurology (A.M.), University of Tübingen Medical Centre, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Neurology (H.M.), International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan; Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences (M.N.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurology (J.P.), John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (D.R.), University of California, Davis, Davis, CA; and Department of Neurology (J.V.), Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - David Richman
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (P.N.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (D.B.S., J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (G.W.), Univ. at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine. Miami, FL; Gabriel Cea (G.C.), Departamento de Ciencias Neurologicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Dipartimento di Neuroscienze (A.E.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Department of Clinical Medicine (N.E.G.), University of Bergen, Norway; Isabel Illa (I.I.), Department of Neurology, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, ERN EURO-NMD and CIBERER U762, Spain; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (N.L.K.), Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; Neurology (A.M.), University of Tübingen Medical Centre, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Neurology (H.M.), International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan; Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences (M.N.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurology (J.P.), John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (D.R.), University of California, Davis, Davis, CA; and Department of Neurology (J.V.), Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Verschuuren
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School (P.N.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (D.B.S., J.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Neurology (G.W.), Univ. at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY; Department of Neurology (M.B.), University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine. Miami, FL; Gabriel Cea (G.C.), Departamento de Ciencias Neurologicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Dipartimento di Neuroscienze (A.E.), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Department of Clinical Medicine (N.E.G.), University of Bergen, Norway; Isabel Illa (I.I.), Department of Neurology, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, ERN EURO-NMD and CIBERER U762, Spain; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology (N.L.K.), Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; Neurology (A.M.), University of Tübingen Medical Centre, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Neurology (H.M.), International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan; Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences (M.N.), Western University, London, ON, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurology (J.P.), John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology (D.R.), University of California, Davis, Davis, CA; and Department of Neurology (J.V.), Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Gavriilaki M, Kimiskidis VK, Gavriilaki E. Precision Medicine in Neurology: The Inspirational Paradigm of Complement Therapeutics. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2020; 13:E341. [PMID: 33114553 PMCID: PMC7693884 DOI: 10.3390/ph13110341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Precision medicine has emerged as a central element of healthcare science. Complement, a component of innate immunity known for centuries, has been implicated in the pathophysiology of numerous incurable neurological diseases, emerging as a potential therapeutic target and predictive biomarker. In parallel, the innovative application of the first complement inhibitor in clinical practice as an approved treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) related with specific antibodies raised hope for the implementation of personalized therapies in detrimental neurological diseases. A thorough literature search was conducted through May 2020 at MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov databases based on medical terms (MeSH)" complement system proteins" and "neurologic disease". Complement's role in pathophysiology, monitoring of disease activity and therapy has been investigated in MG, multiple sclerosis, NMOSD, spinal muscular atrophy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinson, Alzheimer, Huntington disease, Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, stroke, and epilepsy. Given the complexity of complement diagnostics and therapeutics, this state-of-the-art review aims to provide a brief description of the complement system for the neurologist, an overview of novel complement inhibitors and updates of complement studies in a wide range of neurological disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Gavriilaki
- Postgraduate Course, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Vasilios K. Kimiskidis
- Postgraduate Course, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;
- Laboratory of Clinical Neurophysiology, AHEPA Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54621 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Eleni Gavriilaki
- Hematology Department-BMT Unit, G. Papanicolaou Hospital, 57010 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Dalakas MC, Alexopoulos H, Spaeth PJ. Complement in neurological disorders and emerging complement-targeted therapeutics. Nat Rev Neurol 2020; 16:601-617. [PMID: 33005040 PMCID: PMC7528717 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-020-0400-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 178] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The complement system consists of a network of plasma and membrane proteins that modulate tissue homeostasis and contribute to immune surveillance by interacting with the innate and adaptive immune systems. Dysregulation, impairment or inadvertent activation of complement components contribute to the pathogenesis of some autoimmune neurological disorders and could even contribute to neurodegenerative diseases. In this Review, we summarize current knowledge about the main functions of the complement pathways and the involvement of complement in neurological disorders. We describe the complex network of complement proteins that target muscle, the neuromuscular junction, peripheral nerves, the spinal cord or the brain and discuss the autoimmune mechanisms of complement-mediated myopathies, myasthenia, peripheral neuropathies, neuromyelitis and other CNS disorders. We also consider the emerging role of complement in some neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and even schizophrenia. Finally, we provide an overview of the latest complement-targeted immunotherapies including monoclonal antibodies, fusion proteins and peptidomimetics that have been approved, that are undergoing phase I–III clinical trials or that show promise for the treatment of neurological conditions that respond poorly to existing immunotherapies. In this Review, Dalakas et al. discuss the complement system, the role it plays in autoimmune neurological disease and neurodegenerative disease, and provide an overview of the latest therapeutics that target complement and that can be used for or have potential in neurological disorders. Complement has an important physiological role in host immune defences and tissue remodelling. The physiological role of complement extends to the regulation of synaptic development. Complement has a key pathophysiological role in autoimmune neurological diseases and mediates the actions of pathogenic autoantibodies, such as acetylcholine receptor antibodies and aquaporin 4 antibodies. For some autoimmune neurological diseases, such as myasthenia gravis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, approved complement-targeted treatments are now available. Complement also seems to be of pathogenic relevance in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer disease, in which innate immune-driven inflammation is receiving increasing attention. The field of complement-targeted therapeutics is rapidly expanding, with several FDA-approved agents and others currently in phase II and phase III clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marinos C Dalakas
- Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. .,Neuroimmunology Unit, Department of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
| | - Harry Alexopoulos
- Neuroimmunology Unit, Department of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Peter J Spaeth
- Institute of Pharmacology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
90
|
Bernuy-Guevara C, Chehade H, Muller YD, Vionnet J, Cachat F, Guzzo G, Ochoa-Sangrador C, Álvarez FJ, Teta D, Martín-García D, Adler M, de Paz FJ, Lizaraso-Soto F, Pascual M, Herrera-Gómez F. The Inhibition of Complement System in Formal and Emerging Indications: Results from Parallel One-Stage Pairwise and Network Meta-Analyses of Clinical Trials and Real-Life Data Studies. Biomedicines 2020; 8:biomedicines8090355. [PMID: 32948059 PMCID: PMC7554929 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines8090355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Revised: 09/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
This manuscript presents quantitative findings on the actual effectiveness of terminal complement component 5 (C5) inhibitors and complement component 1 (C1) esterase inhibitors through their formal and common “off-label” (compassionate) indications. The results emanated from pairwise and network meta-analyses to present evidence until September 2019. Clinical trials (CT) and real-life non-randomized studies of the effects of interventions (NRSI) are consistent on the benefits of C5 inhibitors and of the absence of effects of C1 esterase inhibitors (n = 7484): Mathematically, eculizumab (surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) >0.6) and ravulizumab (SUCRA ≥ 0.7) were similar in terms of their protective effect on hemolysis in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), and acute kidney injury (AKI) in aHUS, in comparison to pre-/off-treatment state and/or placebo (SUCRA < 0.01), and eculizumab was efficacious on thrombotic events in PNH (odds ratio (OR)/95% confidence interval (95% CI) in CT and real-life NRSI, 0.07/0.03 to 0.19, 0.24/0.17 to 0.33) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) occurrence/progression in PNH (0.31/0.10 to 0.97, 0.66/0.44 to 0.98). In addition, meta-analysis on clinical trials shows that eculizumab mitigates a refractory generalized myasthenia gravis (rgMG) crisis (0.29/0.13 to 0.61) and prevents new acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) episodes in kidney transplant recipients (0.25/0.13 to 0.49). The update of findings from this meta-analysis will be useful to promote a better use of complement inhibitors, and to achieve personalization of treatments with this class of drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Coralina Bernuy-Guevara
- Pharmacological Big Data Laboratory, University of Valladolid, 47005 Valladolid, Spain; (C.B.-G.); (F.J.Á.); (F.J.d.P.); (F.L.-S.)
| | - Hassib Chehade
- Pediatric Nephrology Unit, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, 1100 Lausanne, Switzerland; (H.C.); (F.C.)
| | - Yannick D. Muller
- Transplantation Center, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, 1100 Lausanne, Switzerland; (Y.D.M.); (J.V.); (G.G.); (M.P.)
| | - Julien Vionnet
- Transplantation Center, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, 1100 Lausanne, Switzerland; (Y.D.M.); (J.V.); (G.G.); (M.P.)
- King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK
| | - François Cachat
- Pediatric Nephrology Unit, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, 1100 Lausanne, Switzerland; (H.C.); (F.C.)
| | - Gabriella Guzzo
- Transplantation Center, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, 1100 Lausanne, Switzerland; (Y.D.M.); (J.V.); (G.G.); (M.P.)
| | | | - F. Javier Álvarez
- Pharmacological Big Data Laboratory, University of Valladolid, 47005 Valladolid, Spain; (C.B.-G.); (F.J.Á.); (F.J.d.P.); (F.L.-S.)
- Ethics Committee of Drug Research–east Valladolid area, University Clinical Hospital of Valladolid, 47005 Valladolid, Spain
| | - Daniel Teta
- Department of Nephrology, Hôpital du Valais, 1950 Sion, Switzerland;
| | - Débora Martín-García
- Clinical Nephrology Unit, University Clinical Hospital of Valladolid, 47003 Valladolid, Spain;
| | - Marcel Adler
- Center for Medical Oncology & Hematology, Hospital Thun, 3600 Thun, Switzerland;
| | - Félix J. de Paz
- Pharmacological Big Data Laboratory, University of Valladolid, 47005 Valladolid, Spain; (C.B.-G.); (F.J.Á.); (F.J.d.P.); (F.L.-S.)
| | - Frank Lizaraso-Soto
- Pharmacological Big Data Laboratory, University of Valladolid, 47005 Valladolid, Spain; (C.B.-G.); (F.J.Á.); (F.J.d.P.); (F.L.-S.)
- Centro de Investigación en Salud Pública, Instituto de Investigación de la Facultad de Medicina Humana, Universidad de San Martín de Porres, Lima 15024, Peru
| | - Manuel Pascual
- Transplantation Center, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, 1100 Lausanne, Switzerland; (Y.D.M.); (J.V.); (G.G.); (M.P.)
| | - Francisco Herrera-Gómez
- Pharmacological Big Data Laboratory, University of Valladolid, 47005 Valladolid, Spain; (C.B.-G.); (F.J.Á.); (F.J.d.P.); (F.L.-S.)
- Transplantation Center, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, 1100 Lausanne, Switzerland; (Y.D.M.); (J.V.); (G.G.); (M.P.)
- Centro de Investigación en Salud Pública, Instituto de Investigación de la Facultad de Medicina Humana, Universidad de San Martín de Porres, Lima 15024, Peru
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Virgen de la Concha, 49022 Zamora, Spain
- Castile and León’s Research Consolidated Unit n° 299, 47011 Valladolid, Spain
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +34-983-423077
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
Mantegazza R, Antozzi C. From Traditional to Targeted Immunotherapy in Myasthenia Gravis: Prospects for Research. Front Neurol 2020; 11:981. [PMID: 32982957 PMCID: PMC7492201 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is still based on non-specific immunosuppression. Long-term high dose corticosteroids is still a major cause of side effects, in young as well as in elderly patients in whom comorbidities further increase the burden of chronic immunosuppression. Moreover, awareness of the limits of traditional therapies has led to the concept of “refractory MG.” The therapeutic approach to MG is therefore progressively evolving from the classic combination of corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs to new biological compounds targeting different immunopathological steps. Killing of B cells with Rituximab has been proposed and tested with positive results, particularly in patients with MuSK-associated MG. Therapeutic monoclonals against B cells at different stages of their maturation, or against molecules involved in B cell activation and function, represent a new area for further investigation. A differently targeted approach involved Eculizumab, a monoclonal antibody preventing the formation of C59b-induced MAC causing destruction of the neuromuscular junction. Data from clinical trials led to the approval of Eculizumab in the United States and Europe for MG. Since Eculizumab is a complement-targeted therapy, its use is limited to anti-acetylcholine receptor-associated MG, since anti-MuSK antibodies belong to IgG4 subclass and do not fix complement. Several anti-complement compounds are under investigation. An even more recent approach is the interference with the neonatal Fc receptor leading to a rapid reduction of circulating IgGs and hence of specific autoantibodies, an approach suitable for both anti-acetylcholine- and MuSK-associated MG. The investigation of compounds that selectively target the immune system will stimulate the search for specific biomarkers of disease activity and response to treatment, setting the basis for personalized medicine in MG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renato Mantegazza
- Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Diseases Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico "Carlo Besta", Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Antozzi
- Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Diseases Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico "Carlo Besta", Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
Mantegazza R, O'Brien FL, Yountz M, Howard JF. Consistent improvement with eculizumab across muscle groups in myasthenia gravis. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2020; 7:1327-1339. [PMID: 32700461 PMCID: PMC7448154 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Revised: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether eculizumab, a terminal complement inhibitor, improves patient- and physician-reported outcomes (evaluated using the myasthenia gravis activities of daily living profile and the quantitative myasthenia gravis scale, respectively) in patients with refractory anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis across four domains, representing ocular, bulbar, respiratory, and limb/gross motor muscle groups. METHODS Patients with refractory anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis were randomized 1:1 to receive either placebo or eculizumab during the REGAIN study (NCT01997229). Patients who completed REGAIN were eligible to continue into the open-label extension trial (NCT02301624) for up to 4 years. The four domain scores of each of the myasthenia gravis activities of daily living profile and the quantitative myasthenia gravis scale recorded throughout REGAIN and through 130 weeks of the open-label extension were analyzed. RESULTS Of the 125 patients who participated in REGAIN, 117 enrolled in the open-label extension; 61 had received placebo and 56 had received eculizumab during REGAIN. Patients experienced rapid improvements in total scores and all four domain scores of both the myasthenia gravis activities of daily living profile and the quantitative myasthenia gravis scale with eculizumab treatment. These improvements were sustained through 130 weeks of the open-label extension. INTERPRETATION Eculizumab treatment elicits rapid and sustained improvements in muscle strength across ocular, bulbar, respiratory, and limb/gross motor muscle groups and in associated daily activities in patients with refractory anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renato Mantegazza
- Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Diseases UnitFondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo BestaMilanItaly
| | | | | | - James F. Howard
- Department of NeurologyUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillNC
| |
Collapse
|
93
|
Farrugia ME, Goodfellow JA. A Practical Approach to Managing Patients With Myasthenia Gravis-Opinions and a Review of the Literature. Front Neurol 2020; 11:604. [PMID: 32733360 PMCID: PMC7358547 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 05/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
When the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis (MG) has been secured, the aim of management should be prompt symptom control and the induction of remission or minimal manifestations. Symptom control, with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors such as pyridostigmine, is commonly employed. This may be sufficient in mild disease. There is no single universally accepted treatment regimen. Corticosteroids are the mainstay of immunosuppressive treatment in patients with more than mild MG to induce remission. Immunosuppressive therapies, such as azathioprine are prescribed in addition to but sometimes instead of corticosteroids when background comorbidities preclude or restrict the use of steroids. Rituximab has a role in refractory MG, while plasmapheresis and immunoglobulin therapy are commonly prescribed to treat MG crisis and in some cases of refractory MG. Data from the MGTX trial showed clear evidence that thymectomy is beneficial in patients with acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody positive generalized MG, up to the age of 65 years. Minimally invasive thymectomy surgery including robotic-assisted thymectomy surgery has further revolutionized thymectomy and the management of MG. Ocular MG is not life-threatening but can be significantly disabling when diplopia is persistent. There is evidence to support early treatment with corticosteroids when ocular motility is abnormal and fails to respond to symptomatic treatment. Treatment needs to be individualized in the older age-group depending on specific comorbidities. In the younger age-groups, particularly in women, consideration must be given to the potential teratogenicity of certain therapies. Novel therapies are being developed and trialed, including ones that inhibit complement-induced immunological pathways or interfere with antibody-recycling pathways. Fatigue is common in MG and should be duly identified from fatigable weakness and managed with a combination of physical therapy with or without psychological support. MG patients may also develop dysfunctional breathing and the necessary respiratory physiotherapy techniques need to be implemented to alleviate the patient's symptoms of dyspnoea. In this review, we discuss various facets of myasthenia management in adults with ocular and generalized disease, including some practical approaches and our personal opinions based on our experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Elena Farrugia
- Neurology Department, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - John A Goodfellow
- Neurology Department, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom.,Neuroimmunology Laboratory, Laboratory Medicine and Facilities Building, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
94
|
Menon D, Barnett C, Bril V. Novel Treatments in Myasthenia Gravis. Front Neurol 2020; 11:538. [PMID: 32714266 PMCID: PMC7344308 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is the prototypical autoimmune disorder caused by specific autoantibodies at the neuromuscular junction. Broad-based immunotherapies, such as corticosteroids, azathioprine, mycophenolate, tacrolimus, and cyclosporine, have been effective in controlling symptoms of myasthenia. While being effective in a majority of MG patients many of these immunosuppressive agents are associated with long-term side effects, often intolerable for patients, and take several months to be effective. With advances in translational research and drug development capabilities, more directed therapeutic agents that can alter the future of MG treatment have been developed. This review focuses on the aberrant immunological processes in MG, the novel agents that target them along with the clinical evidence for efficacy and safety. These agents include terminal complement C5 inhibitors, Fc receptor inhibitors, B cell depleting agents (anti CD 19 and 20 and B cell activating factor [BAFF)]inhibitors), proteosome inhibitors, T cells and cytokine based therapies (chimeric antigen receptor T [CART-T] cell therapy), autologous stem cell transplantation, and subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG). Most of these new agents have advantages over conventional immunosuppressive treatment (IST) for MG therapy in terms of faster onset of action, favourable side effect profile and the potential for a sustained and long-term remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Vera Bril
- Ellen & Martin Prosserman Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
Albazli K, Kaminski HJ, Howard JF. Complement Inhibitor Therapy for Myasthenia Gravis. Front Immunol 2020; 11:917. [PMID: 32582144 PMCID: PMC7283905 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2019] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Complement activation as a driver of pathology in myasthenia gravis (MG) has been appreciated for decades. The terminal complement component [membrane attack complex (MAC)] is found at the neuromuscular junctions of patients with MG. Animals with experimental autoimmune MG are dependent predominantly on an active complement system to develop weakness. Mice deficient in intrinsic complement regulatory proteins demonstrate a significant increase in the destruction of the neuromuscular junction. As subtypes of MG have been better defined, it has been appreciated that acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive disease is driven by complement activation. Preclinical assessments have confirmed that complement inhibition would be a viable therapeutic approach. Eculizumab, an antibody directed toward the C5 component of complement, was demonstrated to be effective in a Phase 3 trial with subsequent approval by the Federal Drug Administration of the United States and other worldwide regulatory agencies for its use in acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive MG. Second- and third-generation complement inhibitors are in development and approaching pivotal efficacy evaluations. This review will summarize the history and present the state of knowledge of this new therapeutic modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khaled Albazli
- Department of Neurology, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Henry J. Kaminski
- Department of Neurology, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - James F. Howard
- Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
96
|
Habib AA, Ahmadi Jazi G, Mozaffar T. Update on immune-mediated therapies for myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve 2020; 62:579-592. [PMID: 32462710 DOI: 10.1002/mus.26919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2019] [Revised: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
With the exception of thymectomy, immune modulatory treatment strategies and clinical trials in myasthenia gravis over the past 50 y were mainly borrowed from experience in other nonneurologic autoimmune disorders. The current experimental therapy paradigm has significantly changed such that treatments directed against the pathological mechanisms specific to myasthenia gravis are being tested, in some cases as the initial disease indication. Key advances have been made in three areas: (i) the expanded role and long-term benefits of thymectomy, (ii) complement inhibition to prevent antibody-mediated postsynaptic membrane damage, and (iii) neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibition as in vivo apheresis, removing pathogenic antibodies. Herein, we discuss these advances and the potential for these newer therapies to significantly influence the current treatment paradigms. While these therapies provide exciting new options with rapid efficacy, there are anticipated challenges to their use, especially in terms of a dramatic increase in cost of care for some patients with myasthenia gravis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Aamer Habib
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, California
| | | | - Tahseen Mozaffar
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, California.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California.,Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
Takamori M. Myasthenia Gravis: From the Viewpoint of Pathogenicity Focusing on Acetylcholine Receptor Clustering, Trans-Synaptic Homeostasis and Synaptic Stability. Front Mol Neurosci 2020; 13:86. [PMID: 32547365 PMCID: PMC7272578 DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2020.00086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a disease of the postsynaptic neuromuscular junction (NMJ) where nicotinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptors (AChRs) are targeted by autoantibodies. Search for other pathogenic antigens has detected the antibodies against muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) and low-density lipoprotein-related protein 4 (Lrp4), both causing pre- and post-synaptic impairments. Agrin is also suspected as a fourth pathogen. In a complex NMJ organization centering on MuSK: (1) the Wnt non-canonical pathway through the Wnt-Lrp4-MuSK cysteine-rich domain (CRD)-Dishevelled (Dvl, scaffold protein) signaling acts to form AChR prepatterning with axonal guidance; (2) the neural agrin-Lrp4-MuSK (Ig1/2 domains) signaling acts to form rapsyn-anchored AChR clusters at the innervated stage of muscle; (3) adaptor protein Dok-7 acts on MuSK activation for AChR clustering from “inside” and also on cytoskeleton to stabilize AChR clusters by the downstream effector Sorbs1/2; (4) the trans-synaptic retrograde signaling contributes to the presynaptic organization via: (i) Wnt-MuSK CRD-Dvl-β catenin-Slit 2 pathway; (ii) Lrp4; and (iii) laminins. The presynaptic Ca2+ homeostasis conditioning ACh release is modified by autoreceptors such as M1-type muscarinic AChR and A2A adenosine receptors. The post-synaptic structure is stabilized by: (i) laminin-network including the muscle-derived agrin; (ii) the extracellular matrix proteins (including collagen Q/perlecan and biglycan which link to MuSK Ig1 domain and CRD); and (iii) the dystrophin-associated glycoprotein complex. The study on MuSK ectodomains (Ig1/2 domains and CRD) recognized by antibodies suggested that the MuSK antibodies were pathologically heterogeneous due to their binding to multiple functional domains. Focussing one of the matrix proteins, biglycan which functions in the manner similar to collagen Q, our antibody assay showed the negative result in MG patients. However, the synaptic stability may be impaired by antibodies against MuSK ectodomains because of the linkage of biglycan with MuSK Ig1 domain and CRD. The pathogenic diversity of MG is discussed based on NMJ signaling molecules.
Collapse
|
98
|
Fichtner ML, Jiang R, Bourke A, Nowak RJ, O'Connor KC. Autoimmune Pathology in Myasthenia Gravis Disease Subtypes Is Governed by Divergent Mechanisms of Immunopathology. Front Immunol 2020; 11:776. [PMID: 32547535 PMCID: PMC7274207 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a prototypical autoantibody mediated disease. The autoantibodies in MG target structures within the neuromuscular junction (NMJ), thus affecting neuromuscular transmission. The major disease subtypes of autoimmune MG are defined by their antigenic target. The most common target of pathogenic autoantibodies in MG is the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR), followed by muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) and lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4). MG patients present with similar symptoms independent of the underlying subtype of disease, while the immunopathology is remarkably distinct. Here we highlight these distinct immune mechanisms that describe both the B cell- and autoantibody-mediated pathogenesis by comparing AChR and MuSK MG subtypes. In our discussion of the AChR subtype, we focus on the role of long-lived plasma cells in the production of pathogenic autoantibodies, the IgG1 subclass mediated pathology, and contributions of complement. The similarities underlying the immunopathology of AChR MG and neuromyelitis optica (NMO) are highlighted. In contrast, MuSK MG is caused by autoantibody production by short-lived plasmablasts. MuSK MG autoantibodies are mainly of the IgG4 subclass which can undergo Fab-arm exchange (FAE), a process unique to this subclass. In FAE IgG4, molecules can dissociate into two halves and recombine with other half IgG4 molecules resulting in bispecific antibodies. Similarities between MuSK MG and other IgG4-mediated autoimmune diseases, including pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), are highlighted. Finally, the immunological distinctions are emphasized through presentation of biological therapeutics that provide clinical benefit depending on the MG disease subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam L Fichtner
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.,Department of Immunobiology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Ruoyi Jiang
- Department of Immunobiology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Aoibh Bourke
- Trinity Hall, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Richard J Nowak
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Kevin C O'Connor
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.,Department of Immunobiology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
99
|
Greenwood GT, Lynch Z. Successful Transition from Plasma Exchange to Eculizumab in Acetylcholine Receptor Antibody- and Muscle-Specific Kinase (MuSK) Antibody-Negative Myasthenia Gravis: A Case Report. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CASE REPORTS 2020; 21:e921431. [PMID: 32417849 PMCID: PMC7262480 DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.921431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of eculizumab (a terminal complement inhibitor) in acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody-negative generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) is unknown. CASE REPORT A female patient was diagnosed with AChR-antibody and muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) antibody-negative gMG in March 2016. In January 2017, the patient was referred for plasma exchange (PLEX) because of continuing symptoms. She was also receiving azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and pyridostigmine (all were continued during subsequent therapies). PLEX (5 sessions over 10 days) was initially effective, but over the following month the patient received PLEX weekly, then twice weekly, followed by 3-times weekly because of worsening symptoms. In April 2018, PLEX was reduced to twice weekly following initiation of eculizumab (weekly induction dose of 900 mg 1 day after first PLEX, plus 600 mg on the day of the second PLEX session, for 4 weeks). The patient was then stabilized on eculizumab 1200 mg every 2 weeks and the frequency of PLEX treatment was reduced, until PLEX was discontinued at Week 39 after eculizumab initiation. During eculizumab treatment, the patient's myasthenia gravis activities of daily living (MG-ADL) score decreased from 9 to 1 or 2 at most assessments, with a transient increase to 4 or 5 between Weeks 19 and 27 following less frequent eculizumab treatment. There were no eculizumab-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Following transition from 3-times weekly PLEX to eculizumab in a patient with treatment-refractory, AChR antibody- and MuSK antibody-negative gMG, there were clinically significant improvements in everyday activities affected by MG symptoms. Further investigation of eculizumab in antibody-negative MG is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zachary Lynch
- Nephrology Section, Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
100
|
Jacob S, Murai H, Utsugisawa K, Nowak RJ, Wiendl H, Fujita KP, O'Brien F, Howard JF. Response to eculizumab in patients with myasthenia gravis recently treated with chronic IVIg: a subgroup analysis of REGAIN and its open-label extension study. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2020; 13:1756286420911784. [PMID: 32426038 PMCID: PMC7222230 DOI: 10.1177/1756286420911784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: In the phase III eculizumab for refractory generalized myasthenia gravis REGAIN study [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01997229] and its open-label extension (OLE) [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02301624], patients with treatment-refractory antiacetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis had clinically meaningful improvements with eculizumab versus placebo. This subgroup analysis evaluated data from patients with a recent history of chronic intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) use before study entry. Methods: The subgroup comprised patients who had received IVIg at least four times in 1 year, with at least one IVIg treatment cycle during the 6 months before the first REGAIN study dose. Data from REGAIN and the OLE were analyzed. Response to eculizumab versus placebo was assessed using four validated, disease-specific measures. Incidences of exacerbations and safety endpoints were recorded. Results: The subgroup had similar patient and disease characteristics as the overall REGAIN population. Clinical assessments showed sustained eculizumab efficacy during REGAIN and the OLE over 18 months. Patients receiving placebo in REGAIN experienced rapid improvements in assessment scores when treated with eculizumab in the OLE. There was a lower rate of disease exacerbations with eculizumab than with placebo during REGAIN, and eculizumab was well tolerated. Conclusion: Eculizumab treatment, compared with placebo, results in meaningful clinical improvements and fewer disease exacerbations for patients who previously received chronic IVIg. Trial registration: REGAIN [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01997229]; REGAIN open-label extension [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02301624].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saiju Jacob
- Queen Elizabeth Neuroscience Centre and Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK
| | - Hiroyuki Murai
- Department of Neurology, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan
| | | | - Richard J Nowak
- Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Heinz Wiendl
- Department of Neurology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | | | | | - James F Howard
- Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|