Noninvasive prenatal testing of trisomies 21 and 18 by massively parallel sequencing of maternal plasma DNA in twin pregnancies

Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood in screening for fetal aneuploidies: updated meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To review clinical validation or implementation studies of maternal blood cell-free (cf) DNA analysis and define the performance of screening for fetal trisomies 21, 18 and 13 and sex chromosome aneuploidies.

METHODS

Searches of PubMed, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library were performed to identify all peer-reviewed articles on cfDNA testing in screening for aneuploidies between January 2011, when the first such study was published, and 4 January 2015.

RESULTS

In total, 37 relevant studies were identified and these were used for the meta-analysis on the performance of cfDNA testing in screening for aneuploidies. These studies reported cfDNA results in relation to fetal karyotype from invasive testing or clinical outcome. Weighted pooled detection rates (DR) and false-positive rates (FPR) in singleton pregnancies were 99.2% (95% CI, 98.5-99.6%) and 0.09% (95% CI, 0.05-0.14%), respectively, for trisomy 21, 96.3% (95% CI, 94.3-97.9%) and 0.13% (95% CI, 0.07-0.20) for trisomy 18, 91.0% (95% CI, 85.0-95.6%) and 0.13% (95% CI, 0.05-0.26%) for trisomy 13, 90.3% (95% CI, 85.7-94.2%) and 0.23% (95% CI, 0.14-0.34%) for monosomy X and 93.0% (95% CI, 85.8-97.8%) and 0.14% (95% CI, 0.06-0.24%) for sex chromosome aneuploidies other than monosomy X. For twin pregnancies, the DR for trisomy 21 was 93.7% (95% CI, 83.6-99.2%) and the FPR was 0.23% (95% CI, 0.00-0.92%).

CONCLUSION

Screening for trisomy 21 by analysis of cfDNA in maternal blood is superior to that of all other traditional methods of screening, with higher DR and lower FPR. The performance of screening for trisomies 18 and 13 and sex chromosome aneuploidies is considerably worse than that for trisomy 21.

Cell-free DNA screening for fetal aneuploidy as a clinical service

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) through the analysis of cell free (cf)DNA is revolutionizing prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy. Current methods used in clinical practice include shotgun massively parallel sequencing (s-MPS); targeted (t-MPS); and an approach that takes advantage of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) differences between mother and fetus. Efficacy of cfDNA testing for the common autosomal trisomies far exceeds that of conventional screening. Depending on the methodology used, reasons for discordancy between cfDNA results and fetal karyotype can include true fetal mosaicism, confined placental mosaicism, presence of a maternal karyotype abnormality, insufficient counting due to low fetal fraction, and a vanishing twin. Among the possible cfDNA strategies a Primary test has the highest performance but is expensive, while a Contingent cfDNA test can achieve high performance at a relatively low cost. Practicalities to be considered in the provision of testing include pretest counseling about the scope and accuracy of the testing, the interpretation of results when there is a low fetal fraction and follow-up studies for positive test results. The role of first trimester nuchal translucency measurement and conventional biochemical testing needs to be reassessed in the context of the use of cfDNA.

Performance of screening for aneuploidies by cell-free DNA analysis of maternal blood in twin pregnancies

OBJECTIVES

To report clinical implementation of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis of maternal blood in screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in twin pregnancies and examine variables that could influence the failure rate of the test.

METHODS

cfDNA testing was performed in 515 twin pregnancies at 10-28 weeks' gestation. The failure rate of the test to provide results was compared with that in 1847 singleton pregnancies, and logistic regression analysis was used to determine which factors among maternal and pregnancy characteristics were significant predictors of test failure.

RESULTS

Failure rate of the cfDNA test at first sampling was 1.7% in singletons and 5.6% in twins. Of those with a test result, the median fetal fraction in twins was 8.7% (range, 4.1-30.0%), which was lower than that in singletons (11.7% (range, 4.0-38.9%)). Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that twin pregnancy, higher maternal weight and conception by in-vitro fertilization provided significant independent prediction of test failure. Follow-up was available in 351 (68.2%) of the twin pregnancies and comprised 334 with euploid fetuses, 12 discordant for trisomy 21 and five discordant for trisomy 18. In all 323 euploid cases with a result, the risk score for each trisomy was < 1:10 000. In 11 of the 12 cases with trisomy 21 and in the five with trisomy 18, the cfDNA test gave a high-risk result, but in one case of trisomy 21, the score was < 1:10 000.

CONCLUSION

In twin pregnancies screening by cfDNA testing is feasible, but the failure rate is higher and detection rate may be lower than in singletons.

Nichtinvasive Pränataldiagnostik

Das Ersttrimesterscreening zur Risikobestimmung für die Trisomien 21, 18 und 13 hat sich in den letzten 15 Jahren in Deutschland etabliert. Die optimale Durchführung setzt die Einhaltung bestimmter Messkriterien beim Ultraschall und bei der biochemischen Analyse voraus sowie die Benutzung evaluierter Risikoberechnungsprogramme wie dem Berechnungsprogramm PRC der Fetal Medicine Foundation Deutschland (FMF-D). Durch die neue Version des Berechnungsprogramms PRC konnten die Trisomie-21-, -18- und -13-Detektionsraten erhöht werden bei gleichzeitiger Senkung der Falsch-positiv-Raten, was einen großen Fortschritt verglichen mit der mütterlichen Altersindikation darstellt.

Durch die Analyse der zellfreien fetalen DNA aus dem mütterlichen Plasma können seit 2 Jahren aber wesentlich bessere Screeningvorhersagen getroffen werden. Über 99 % aller Trisomie-21-Schwangerschaften können mit dieser Methodik als Risikogruppe beschrieben werden. Die Falsch-positiv-Rate liegt unter 1 %. Durch diese Methode ist ein Paradigmenwechsel in der Pränataldiagnostik zu erwarten.

Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing Using Cell Free DNA in Maternal Plasma: Recent Developments and Future Prospects

Recent advances in molecular genetic technologies have facilitated non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) through the analysis of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma. NIPT can be used to identify monogenic disorders including the identification of autosomal recessive disorders where the maternally inherited mutation needs to be identified in the presence of an excess of maternal DNA that contains the same mutation. In the future, simultaneous screening for multiple monogenic disorders is anticipated. Several NIPT methods have been developed to screen for trisomy. These have been shown to be effective for fetal trisomy 21, 18 and 13. Although the testing has been extended to sex chromosome aneuploidy, robust estimates of the efficacy are not yet available and maternal mosaicism for gain or loss of an X-chromosome needs to be considered. Using methods based on the analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms, diandric triploidy can be identified. NIPT is being developed to identify a number of microdeletion syndromes including α-globin gene deletion. NIPT is a profoundly important development in prenatal care that is substantially advancing the individual patient and public health benefits achieved through conventional prenatal screening and diagnosis.

Clinical Perspective of Cell-Free DNA Testing for Fetal Aneuploidies

Cell-free DNA testing in maternal blood provides the most effective method of screening for trisomy 21, with a reported detection rate of 99% and a false positive rate of less than 0.1%. After many years of research, this method is now commercially available and is carried out in an increasing number of patients, and there is an expanding number of conditions that can be screened for. However, the application of these methods in clinical practice requires a careful analysis. Current first-trimester screening strategies are based on a complex combination of tests, aiming at detecting fetal defects and predicting the risk of main pregnancy complications. It is therefore necessary to define the optimal way of combining cell-free DNA testing with current first-trimester screening methods. In this concise review we describe the basis of cell-free DNA testing and discuss the potential approaches for its implementation in combination with current tests in the first trimester.