Degradation of ornithine decarboxylase by the 26S proteasome

The preovulatory rise of ovarian ornithine decarboxylase is required for progesterone secretion by the corpus luteum

Ovarian progesterone secretion during the diestrus stage of the estrous cycle is produced by luteal cells derived from granulosa and thecal cells after the differentiation process that follows ovulation. Our results show that blockade of the preovulatory rise of ovarian ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), a key enzyme in polyamine biosynthesis, by treatment with the specific inhibitor alpha-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) leads to a significant decrease in the ovarian progesterone content and a dramatic fall in the plasma levels of this hormone during the following diestrus. The same inhibition was produced in spite of the fact that both luteinizing and follicle stimulating hormones were given concomitantly with DFMO. On the other hand, the acute rise in the plasma progesterone levels observed after administration of human chorionic gonadotropin to mice at different periods of the estrous cycle was not affected by DFMO administration. Our results indicate that although elevated levels of ODC are not required for acute ovarian steroidogenesis, the preovulatory peak of ovarian ODC activity observed in the evening of proestrus may be critical for the establishment of a constitutive steroidogenic pathway and progesterone secretion by the corpus luteum during the diestrus stage of the murine estrous cycle.

The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction

Between the 1960s and 1980s, most life scientists focused their attention on studies of nucleic acids and the translation of the coded information. Protein degradation was a neglected area, considered to be a nonspecific, dead-end process. Although it was known that proteins do turn over, the large extent and high specificity of the process, whereby distinct proteins have half-lives that range from a few minutes to several days, was not appreciated. The discovery of the lysosome by Christian de Duve did not significantly change this view, because it became clear that this organelle is involved mostly in the degradation of extracellular proteins, and their proteases cannot be substrate specific. The discovery of the complex cascade of the ubiquitin pathway revolutionized the field. It is clear now that degradation of cellular proteins is a highly complex, temporally controlled, and tightly regulated process that plays major roles in a variety of basic pathways during cell life and death as well as in health and disease. With the multitude of substrates targeted and the myriad processes involved, it is not surprising that aberrations in the pathway are implicated in the pathogenesis of many diseases, certain malignancies, and neurodegeneration among them. Degradation of a protein via the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway involves two successive steps: 1) conjugation of multiple ubiquitin moieties to the substrate and 2) degradation of the tagged protein by the downstream 26S proteasome complex. Despite intensive research, the unknown still exceeds what we currently know on intracellular protein degradation, and major key questions have remained unsolved. Among these are the modes of specific and timed recognition for the degradation of the many substrates and the mechanisms that underlie aberrations in the system that lead to pathogenesis of diseases.

26 S proteasomes function as stable entities

Most proteins in eukaryotic cells are degraded by 26-S proteasomes, usually after being conjugated to ubiquitin. In the absence of ATP, 26-S proteasomes fall apart into their two sub-complexes, 20-S proteasomes and PA700, which reassemble upon addition of ATP. Conceivably, 26-S proteasomes dissociate and reassemble during initiation of protein degradation in a ternary complex with the substrate, as in the dissociation-reassembly cycles found for ribosomes and the chaperonin GroEL/GroES. Here we followed disassembly and assembly of 26-S proteasomes in cell extracts as the exchange of PA700 subunits between mouse and human 26-S proteasomes. Compared to the rate of proteolysis in the same extract, the disassembly-reassembly cycle was much too slow to present an obligatory step in a degradation cycle. It has been suggested that subunit S5a (Mcb1, Rpn10), which binds poly-ubiquitin substrates, shuttles between a free state and the 26-S proteasome, bringing substrate to the complex. However, S5a was not found in the free state in HeLa cells. Besides, all subunits in PA700, including S5a, exchanged at similar low rates. It therefore seems that 26-S proteasomes function as stable entities during degradation of proteins.

Cell culture analysis of the regulatory frameshift event required for the expression of mammalian antizymes

BACKGROUND

Antizyme is a critical regulator of cellular polyamine levels due to its effect on polyamine transport and its ability to target ornithine decarboxylase for degradation. Antizyme expression is autoregulatory, through dependence on an unusual +1 translational frameshift mechanism that responds to polyamine levels.

RESULTS

HEK293 cells were depleted of polyamines by treatment with an ornithine decarboxylase inhibitor, difluoromethylornithine (DFMO), and grown in the presence or absence of exogenous polyamines prior to the analysis of ribosomal frameshifting levels. Results obtained using an optimized dual luciferase assay system reveal a 10-fold dynamic range of frameshifting, which correlates positively with polyamine addition. Polyamine addition to cells, which have not been pre-treated with DFMO, also resulted in an increase in antizyme frameshifting but to a lesser degree (1.3 to 1.5-fold). In addition, the constructs with the 3' deletion were more responsive to stimulation by polyamine addition than those with the 5' deletion.

CONCLUSIONS

The observed regulation of antizyme frameshifting demonstrates the efficiency of a polyamine homeostatic mechanism, and illustrates the utility of a quantifiable cell-based assay for the analysis of polyamines or their analogues on translational frameshifting.

Ubiquitination is essential for human cytomegalovirus US11-mediated dislocation of MHC class I molecules from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cytosol

Human cytomegalovirus encodes two glycoproteins, US2 and US11, which cause rapid degradation of MHC class I molecules, thus preventing recognition of virus-infected cells by the immune system. This degradation process involves retrograde transport or 'dislocation' of MHC class I molecules from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the cytosol, where they are deglycosylated by an N-glycanase and degraded by the proteasome. At present it is unknown whether ubiquitination is required for US2- and US11-mediated dislocation and degradation of MHC class I molecules. Here, we show that in E36ts20 hamster cells, which contain a temperature-sensitive mutation in the E1 ubiquitin-activating enzyme, US11-mediated degradation of MHC class I molecules is strongly impaired at the non-permissive temperature, indicating the necessity for ubiquitination in this process. We next addressed the question of whether ubiquitination is a condition for the retrograde movement of MHC class I molecules from the ER to the cytosol, or whether ubiquitination is merely required for recognition of dislocated MHC class I molecules by the proteasome. In the absence of a functional ubiquitin system, complexes of US11 and MHC class I molecules accumulate in the ER. In this state the membrane topology of MHC class I molecules does not significantly change, as judged from proteinase K digestions. Thus the results indicate that a functional ubiquitin system is essential for dislocation of MHC class I molecules from the ER to the cytosol.

Dopamine beta-monooxygenase signal/anchor sequence alters trafficking of peptidylglycine alpha-hydroxylating monooxygenase

Dopamine beta-monooxygenase (DBM) and peptidylglycine alpha-hydroxylating monooxygenase (PHM) are essential for the biosynthesis of catecholamines and amidated peptides, respectively. The enzymes share a conserved catalytic core. We studied the role of the DBM signal sequence by appending it to soluble PHM (PHMs) and expressing the DBMsignal/PHMs chimera in AtT-20 and Chinese hamster ovary cells. PHMs produced as part of DBMsignal/PHMs was active. In vitro translated and cellular DBMsignal/PHMs had similar masses, indicating that the DBM signal was not removed. DBMsignal/PHMs was membrane-associated and had the properties of an intrinsic membrane protein. After in vitro translation in the presence of microsomal membranes, trypsin treatment removed 2 kDa from DBMsignal/PHMs while PHMs was entirely protected. In addition, a Cys residue in DBMsignal/PHMs was accessible to Cys-directed biotinylation. Thus the chimera adopts the topology of a type II membrane protein. Pulse-chase experiments indicate that DBMsignal/PHMs turns over rapidly after exiting the trans-Golgi network. Although PHMs is efficiently localized to secretory granules, DBMsignal/PHMs is largely localized to the endoplasmic reticulum in AtT-20 cells. On the basis of stimulated secretion, the small amount of PHMs generated is stored in secretory granules. In contrast, the expression of DBMsignal/PHMs in PC12 cells yields protein that is localized to secretory granules.

Ubiquitin- and proteasome-dependent proteolysis in plants

In recent years it has become obvious that protein degradation is an important catabolic process during development in plants and animals. One very conserved degradative system is the ubiquitin- and proteasome-dependent proteolytic pathway, which is found in all eukaryotes from yeast to mammals and plants. The pathway consists of two parts, one in which chains of ubiquitin are conjugated to substrate proteins, and one in which these substrate proteins are either degraded by the 26S proteasome or are de-ubiquitinated. The ubiquitin- and proteasome-dependent pathway degrades a wide range of proteins in the nucleus and cytoplasm. It is highly specific, but controls a large number of cellular events due to the diversity in the conjugating enzymes. This pathway is important for removal of abnormal/damaged proteins that have had their recognition sites exposed as well as for control of specific transcription factors and cell cycle regulators. In plants, ubiquitin- and proteasome-dependent proteolysis is known to be involved in regulation of the cell cycle and transcription factors as well as endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein degradation, stress response and developmental processes, such as xylogenesis and senescence.

Getting in and out of the proteasome

By far the best understood role of the proteasome is to remove ubiquitin-conjugated proteins from eukaryotric cells by hydrolysing them into small peptides of varying lengths. These include both misfolded/abnormal proteins, as well as 'normal' proteins that need to be rapidly removed for regulatory purposes. However, the proteasome is also present in numerous prokaryotic organisms, while ubiquitin, and the ubiquitin conjugating system, are not. The eukaryotic proteasome has been adapted to degrading proteins in a ubiquitin-dependent fashion by the addition of regulatory factors that assemble in different layers onto the proteolytic core of the proteasome, and by increasing the diversity of the core subunits as well. In addition to hydrolysing ubiquitinated proteins into amino acids, the proteasome can also proteolyse selected non-ubiquitinated proteins, process proteins, and possibly refold misfolded proteins. This review will focus on the different proteasome functions, and how these are used in the multiple regulatory roles the proteasome plays in eukaryotic cells.