Costa B, Piñol C. Acarbose in ambulatory treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus associated to imminent sulfonylurea failure: a randomised-multicentric trial in primary health-care. Diabetes and Acarbose Research Group.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1997;
38:33-40. [PMID:
9347244 DOI:
10.1016/s0168-8227(97)00083-1]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
To assess the efficacy and safety of acarbose as an adjunct to high sulfonylurea (SU) doses in patients with imminent SU failure, a randomised, multicentric, 6 month double-blind, parallel and placebo-controlled trial was performed in primary healthcare. Entry criteria were: NIDDM patients in concomitant dietary follow-up, age > 40 year-old, more than 3 years of diagnosed diabetes, baseline HbAlc levels between 8-12% (N: 4-6%), stable body mass index < 35 kg m-2 and glibenclamide daily dose > 10 mg. After 1 month placebo run-in period all patients were randomly allocated into two groups of treatment (acarbose 100 mg t.i.d. vs placebo). HbAlc levels, the main efficacy variable, lipid profile, fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels were performed and adverse events were also recorded. A total number of 65 patients were randomised, 36 in acarbose and 29 in a placebo group. No statistical differences were found on age (60.2/61.7 year-old), BMI (28.7/27.4 kg m-2), glibenclamide dose (14.5/14.0 mg/day) and baseline HbAlc (9.0/8.8%). Acarbose-treated patients significantly reduced HbAlc levels (9.0/7.9 vs 8.8/8.5%; P < 0.01), based upon a marked decrease, but statistically not significant, in mean postprandial plasma glucose levels (11.9/9.6 vs 12.4/11.1 mmol l-1). No significant differences between fasting plasma glucose and lipid profile were detected. A total of 31 patients (47.7%) reported adverse events, 20 (55.5%) and 11 (37.9%) in acarbose and placebo treatment group respectively. Relationship with drug was estimated as possible or probable in 16 (44.4%) of acarbose-treated patients. None of them were excluded from study participation due to insulin requirement. Only seven patients (10.7%), six with acarbose (16.6%) and one with placebo (3.8%), withdrew the study because of the adverse events. Thus, acarbose seems to be a useful option in order to improve HbAlc levels in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus with imminent sulfonylurea failure.
Collapse