Transplantation einer Spenderleber auf zwei Empf�nger (Splitting-Transplantation) - Eine neue Methode in der Weiterentwicklung der Lebersegmenttransplantation

The First Two Liver Transplantations in Syria

Liver transplantation (LT) is the only curative therapy for the end-stage liver diseases and some metabolic disorders which affect the hepatic cell like the Crigler-Najjar syndrome type 1 (CNSI). Although the LT is a routine procedure in many centers worldwide, the postoperative complications such as rejection, arterial thrombosis, and infection remain serious challenges even in big centers. In our paper, we demonstrate the first two LTs in Syria. The first one was performed on 6 February 2016 for an 11-year-old boy suffering from CNSI using an auxiliary LT, but unfortunately, he had a hepatic artery and portal vein thrombosis, so we removed the necrotic graft on the fifth postoperative day, and he survived. The second LT was for a 9-year-old boy, who had cryptogenic liver cirrhosis, and he lived for 31 days after the transplantation. In both transplants, grafts were obtained from living relative donors.

Internal split liver transplants reduce the waiting list time for teenagers with a low calculated Model for End-stage Liver Disease score

BACKGROUND

Split liver transplantation allows for the simultaneous transplantation of two patients, typically a child and an adult, with a single organ. We report our experience with "internal splits" in which 10 pediatric patients from our institution were transplanted with five organs. We hypothesized that this would reduce the WL time for teenagers with a low calculated MELD score.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of those 10 patients was done. Their WL time was compared with local, regional, and national data. P < .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The median age of the five primary recipients to whom the liver was first allocated was 2.3 years (0.7-7.4) (median weight 10.4 kg (8.4-17.7)). They received a segment 2-3 graft. Five "secondary" recipients (median age 17.4 years (16.6-18.9); median weight 66.2 kg (53.7-70.0)) were identified on our WL to receive the trisector graft. At transplant, their median calculated MELD score was 11 (8-20). Their mean WL time (241.6 ± 218.9 days) was significantly shorter than local (480.6 ± 833.6 days), regional (370.4 ± 563.4 days), and national patients (245.6 ± 465.4 days) with MELD ≤ 20 (P = .047). There was no significant difference between their WL time and that of patients with a MELD 8 ≤ x≤31 (equivalent to their median exception score, P = .63). Patient and graft survival was 100% for all 10 patients.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, simultaneous internal split liver transplantation allowed teenagers with a low calculated MELD score to be transplanted faster than patients with a similar score. Promoting the use of internal split liver transplantation could help reduce the pediatric waitlist mortality.

Considering extended right lobe grafts as major extended donor criteria in liver transplantation is justified

The outcomes of split-liver transplantation are controversial. This study compared outcomes and morbidity after extended right lobe liver transplantation (ERLT) and whole liver transplantation (WLT) in adults. MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were searched systematically and unrestrictedly for studies on ERLT and its impact on graft and patient survival, and postoperative complications. Graft loss and patient mortality odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were assessed by meta-analyses using Mantel-Haenszel tests with a random-effects model. Vascular and biliary complications, primary nonfunction, 3-month, 1-, and 3-year graft and patient survival, and retransplantation after ERLT and WLT were analyzed. The literature search yielded 10 594 articles. After exclusion, 22 studies (n = 75 799 adult transplant patients) were included in the analysis. ERLT was associated with lower 3-month (OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.09-1.89, P = 0.01), 1-year (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.08-1.97, P = 0.01), and 3-year (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.01-1.84, P = 0.04) graft survival. WL grafts were less associated with retransplantation (OR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.41-0.80; P < 0.01), vascular complications (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.38-0.74, P < 0.01) and biliary complications (OR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.47-0.95; P = 0.03). Considering ERLT as major Extended Donor Criteria is justified because ERL grafts are associated with vasculobiliary complications and the need for retransplantation, and have a negative influence on graft survival.

Feasibility of Full-Right/Full-Left Split-Liver Transplant in Pediatric Deceased Donors for Pediatric Recipients

This case report describes the first ex situ full-right/full-left splitting of a liver from a pediatric deceased donor in the Middle East with an excellent outcome for both recipients. The left lateral split-liver transplant requires division of the deceased donor liver into a left lateral lobe for a pediatric recipient and an extended right lobe for an adult recipient, thus producing only 1 graft for a pediatric recipient. Full-right/full-left liver transplant, which splits the liver along the line of Cantlie, is a much more complex and challenging surgery, even though the technique is fully developed, and is theoretically able to produce 2 sizeable grafts for 2 pediatric recipients. However, the full-right/full-left liver transplant remains limited because of the small vascular structures and therefore was not recommended and was not previously described in the literature.

Ex Situ Dual Hypothermic Oxygenated Machine Perfusion for Human Split Liver Transplantation

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Liver splitting allows the opportunity to share a deceased graft between 2 recipients but remains underutilized. We hypothesized that liver splitting during continuous dual hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (DHOPE) is feasible, with shortened total cold ischemia times and improved logistics. Here, we describe a left lateral segment (LLS) and extended right lobe (ERL) liver split procedure during continuous DHOPE preservation with subsequent transplantation at 2 different centers.

Adult split liver transplantation: A PRISMA-compliant Chinese single-center retrospective case-control study

Although pediatric split liver transplantation (SLT) has been proven safe and the waitlist mortality rate has been successfully reduced, the safety of adult SLT has not been confirmed.Using 1:2 matching, 47 recipients who underwent adult SLT were matched to 94 of 743 recipients who underwent adult whole graft liver transplantation (WGLT). Eventually, 141 recipients were included in the case-control study. Subgroup analysis of 43 recipients in the SLT group was performed based on the presence of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) in the grafts.No significant differences in 5-year survival (80.8% vs 81.6%, P = .465) were observed between the adult SLT and WGLT groups. However, compared to recipients in the WGLT group, those in the SLT group had more Clavien-Dindo grade III-V complications, longer hospitalization duration, and higher mortality within 45 days. Furthermore, on multivariate analysis, 45-day postoperative mortality in recipients in the SLT group was mainly affected by hyperbilirubinemia within postoperative day (POD) 7-14, surgery time, and intraoperative blood loss. Subgroup analysis showed no significant differences in hyperbilirubinemia within POD 7-14, complications, and survival rate between SLTMHV(+) and SLTMHV [-].Adult SLT is safe and effective based on long-term survival rates; however, a reduction in the incidence of short-term complications is required. Non-obstructive hyperbilirubinemia within POD 7 to 14 is an independent predictor of short-term mortality after SLT.

A Novel Surgical Technique to Assure Donor and Recipient Safety: Pyloric to Segment 4 Arterial Reconstruction

Background.

Strategies to extend the pool of organs include and promote the use of segmental liver grafts. While performing a living donor left lateral segment (LLS) liver transplant and in split procedures, the hepatic artery´s division becomes critical when a dominant segment 4 artery (S4A) emerges from the left hepatic artery (LHA). We aim to describe a novel technique that consists of performing microsurgical reconstruction from the pyloric artery (PA) to S4A.

Case Reports.

A 45-y-old living donor was evaluated to use his LLS as a graft for a pediatric recipient. During the procedure, a dominant S4A born from the LHA was dissected. To obtain an appropriate LHA length and diameter for the recipient, it was necessary to transect it. An extended right lobe split graft was used in a 61-y-old patient. The S4A born from LHA had to be sectioned during the split procedure. In both cases, segment 4 remained incompletely perfused. The PA was dissected with enough length to be rotated, to perform a microsurgical anastomosis to the S4A, recovering parenchyma’s color and Doppler signal while vascular permeability was demonstrated using CT scan. There was no biliary or cut surface complication.

Conclusions.

PA to S4A reconstruction is a simple and novel technique that can be used for LLS and extended right lobe split graft and might contribute to increase donor selection and reduce living donor and recipient S4A-related complications.

Treatment of biliodigestive anastomotic strictures after transplantation of left lateral segment of the liver

Many studies have shown that biliary complications after transplantation of the left lateral segment (LLS) of the liver reduce graft and recipient survival. Thus, timely correction of biliary complications, and strictures in particular, improves long-term outcomes in transplantation. Objective: to analyze our own experience in correcting biliary strictures in LLS graft transplantation. Materials and methods. From February 2014 to April 2020, 425 LLS grafts were transplanted in children. 19 (4.5%) patients were diagnosed with biliary strictures at different times after transplantation (from 0.2 to 97 months). Results. Biliary strictures were more often formed a year after transplantation (17.8 ± 23.9 months). In 14 out of the 19 patients, internal-external biliary drainage was successfully performed with phased replacement of the catheter with one that was larger in diameter (from 8.5 Fr to 14 Fr). The catheters were removed in 8 patients after completion of the treatment cycle. Restenosis was not observed during follow-up (13 ± 8.7 months) after the internal-external biliary drainage catheter had been removed. In 5 cases, antegrade passage of a guide wire through the stricture was unsuccessful. As a result, biliary reconstruction was performed in 4 (21.1%) patients and retransplantation was required in 1 (5.3%) patient. Conclusion. An antegrade minimally invasive approach can successfully eliminate biliary strictures in most children after liver LLS graft transplantation. The proposed technique is effective and safe.

Prognosis of Split Liver Transplantation Compared with Whole Liver Transplantation in Adult Patients: Single-center Results under the Korean MELD Score-based Allocation Policy

BACKGROUND

Split liver transplantation (SLT) has been occasionally performed in Korea. This study compared the incidence and prognosis of SLT with whole liver transplantation (WLT) in adult patients.

METHODS

Between June 2016 and November 2019, 242 adult patients underwent a total of 256 deceased donor liver transplantation operations. SLT was performed in 7 patients (2.9%).

RESULTS

The mean age of SLT donors was 29.7 ± 7.4 years, and the mean age of recipients was 55.7 ± 10.6 years, with the latter having a mean model for end-stage liver disease score of 34.6 ± 3.1. Mean split right liver graft weight was 1,228.6 ± 149.7 g and mean graft-recipient weight ratio was 1.97 ± 0.39. Of the seven SLT recipients, Korean Network for Organ Sharing (KONOS) status was one in status 1, one in status 2 and five in status 3. The graft (P = 0.72) and patient (P = 0.84) survival rates were comparable in the SLT and WLT groups. Following propensity score matching, graft (P = 0.61) and patient (P = 0.91) survival rates remained comparable in the two groups. Univariate analysis showed that pretransplant ventilator support and renal replacement therapy were significantly associated with patient survival, whereas KONOS status category and primary liver diseases were not. Multivariate analysis showed that pretransplant ventilator support was an independent risk factor for patient survival.

CONCLUSION

Survival outcomes were similar in adult SLT and WLT recipients, probably due to selection of high-quality grafts and low-risk recipients. Prudent selection of donors and adult recipients for SLT may expand the liver graft pool for pediatric patients without affecting outcomes in adults undergoing SLT.

[Living related liver transplantation]

Liver transplantation has become established as a standard procedure in the treatment of end-stage liver diseases. Despite intense efforts by all parties involved up to the amendment of the German Transplantation Act, the lack of suitable donor organs was still one of the limiting factors of this therapeutic procedure. One way out of this problem is to make so-called marginal organs usable, e.g. with the help of machine perfusion or by utilizing living liver donation, which are used in some countries for more than 90% of organ donations. In general, there is no difference in the indications for liver transplantation between a (partial) organ obtained by post-mortem or living donation. Before any living donation, a thorough evaluation of the donor is carried out in order to minimize postoperative morbidity as far as possible. Technically the partial liver donation is based on the oncological liver resection, while the partial liver transplantation is a further development of split liver transplantation after post-mortem liver donation. In specialized centers comparable or even better results can nowadays be achieved using living liver donation instead of post-mortem donation.

Small-for-size syndrome in liver transplantation: Definition, pathophysiology and management

BACKGROUND

Since the first success in an adult patient, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has become an universally used procedure. Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) is a well-known complication after partial LT, especially in cases of adult-to-adult LDLT. The definition of SFSS slightly varies among transplant physicians. The use of a partial liver graft has risks of SFSS development. Persistent portal vein (PV) hypertension and PV hyper-perfusion after LT were identified as the main factors. Hence, various approaches were explored to modulate PV flow and decrease PV pressure in order to alleviate this syndrome. Herein, the definition, clinical symptoms, pathophysiology, basic research, as well as preventive and treatment strategies for SFSS are reviewed based on an extensive review of the literature and on our own experiences.

DATA SOURCES

The articles were collected through PubMed using search terms "liver transplantation", "living donor liver transplantation", "living liver donation", "partial graft", "small-for-size graft", "small-for-size syndrome", "graft volume", "remnant liver", "standard liver volume", "graft to recipient body weight ratio", "sarcopenia", "porcine", "swine", and "rat". English publications published before March 31, 2020 were included in this review.

RESULTS

Many transplant surgeons performed PV flow modulation, including portocaval shunt, splenic artery ligation and splenectomy. With these techniques, patient outcome has been improved even when using a "small" graft. Other factors, such as preoperative recipients' nutritional and skeletal muscle status, graft congestion, and donor factors, were also identified as risk factors which all have been addressed using various strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical approach controlling PV flow and pressure could help to prevent SFSS especially in severely ill recipients. In the absence of efficacious medications to resolve SFSS, conservative treatments, including aggressive fluid balance correction for massive ascites, anti-microbiological therapy to prevent or control sepsis and intensive nutritional therapy, are all required if SFSS could not be prevented.

Mesenchymal Stromal Cells, a New Player in Reducing Complications From Liver Transplantation?

In response to the global burden of liver disease there has been a commensurate increase in the demand for liver transplantation. However, due to a paucity of donor organs many centers have moved toward the routine use of marginal allografts, which can be associated with a greater risk of complications and poorer clinical outcomes. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) are a multi-potent progenitor cell population that have been utilized to modulate aberrant immune responses in acute and chronic inflammatory conditions. MSC exert an immunomodulatory effect on innate and adaptive immune systems through the release of both paracrine soluble factors and extracellular vesicles. Through these routes MSC can switch the regulatory function of the immune system through effects on macrophages and T regulatory cells enabling a switch of phenotype from injury to restoration. A key benefit seems to be their ability to tailor their response to the inflammatory environment without compromising the host ability to fight infection. With over 200 clinical trials registered to examine MSC therapy in liver disease and an increasing number of trials of MSC therapy in solid organ transplant recipients, there is increasing consideration for their use in liver transplantation. In this review we critically appraise the potential role of MSC therapy in the context of liver transplantation, including their ability to modulate reperfusion injury, their role in the reduction of medium term complications in the biliary tree and their potential to enhance tolerance in transplanted organs.

Split liver transplantation is utilized infrequently and concentrated at few transplant centers in the United States

Split liver transplantation (SLT) is 1 strategy for maximizing the number of deceased donor liver transplants. Recent reports suggest that utilization of SLT in the United States remains low. We examined deceased donor offers that were ultimately split between 2010 and 2014. SLTs were categorized as "primary" and "secondary" transplants. We analyzed allocation patterns and used logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with secondary split discard. Four hundred eighteen livers were split: 54% from adult, 46% from pediatric donors. Of the 227 adult donor livers split, 61% met United Network for Organ Sharing "optimal" split criteria. A total of 770 recipients (418 primary and 352 secondary) were transplanted, indicating 16% discard. Ninety-two percent of the 418 primary recipients were children, and 47% were accepted on the first offer. Eighty-seven percent of the 352 secondary recipients were adults, and 7% were accepted on the first offer. Of the 352 pairs, 99% were transplanted in the same region, 36% at the same center. In logistic regression, shorter donor height was associated with secondary discard (odds ratio 0.97 per cm, 95% CI 0.94-1.00, P = .02). SLT volume by center was not predictive of secondary discard. Current policy proposals that incentivize SLT in the United States could increase the number of transplants to children and adults.

Pediatric Liver Transplantation: Then and Now

This paper reviews the past 50 years of liver transplantation in children from the perspective of patient demographics, perioperative patient management, surgical techniques, immunosuppression and patient outcomes.

Encouraging Split Liver Transplantation for Two Adult Recipients to Mitigate the High Incidence of Wait-list Mortality in The Setting of Extreme Shortage of Deceased Donors

Background: Organ demand for liver transplantation (LT) is constantly increasing. Split liver transplantation (SPLT) is an ideal option for increasing the number of available liver grafts for transplantation and ameliorating organ shortage to a certain degree. However, SPLT for two adult recipients is still not broadly applied. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of SPLT for adult recipients at a single center. All donor, recipient, and transplantation factors were thoroughly investigated to clarify factors affecting patient outcomes after LT. Results: One hundred consecutive adult SPLTs were performed during the study period. Early mortality and 1-year mortality occurred in 21 and 31 recipients, respectively. On multivariate analysis, graft weight (p = 0.036, odds ratio = 0.99, 95% confidence interval = 0.98–0.99) was the independent risk factor associated with early mortality; however, no factor was significantly related to 1-year mortality. On receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, a graft weight of 580 g was identified the cutoff for stratifying outcomes. Recipients transplanted with a graft weighing ≥580 g had significantly better outcome as compared with other recipients (p = 0.001). Moreover, SPLT remarkably provided a better survival benefit for recipients than those on the LT wait-list (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Given the considerable incidence of wait-list mortality, SPLT for two adult recipients should be encouraged whenever possible to increase the donor pool and benefit patients awaiting LT. Nonetheless, caution should be taken with a smaller graft weight owing to the risk of early graft loss.

Islet Transplantation in Children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Transplantation of the islets of Langerhans or the pancreas aims to restore blood sugar control. We review both forms of transplantation in children.

RECENT FINDINGS

Allogenic islet transplantation typically in to the liver via the portal vein may be a potential alternative to pancreas transplantation in the future. Autologous islet transplantation after total pancreatectomy is effective for debilitating symptoms of recurrent and chronic pancreatitis. Chronic pancreatitis in children is most often related to genetic mutations but is otherwise similar to adults with eventual exocrine and endocrine failure. Removal of the pancreas ameliorates pain, and islet transplantation preserves endocrine function to the extent allowed by the damage sustained by the pancreas from chronic inflammation. Despite the complexity of the operative procedure, the outcome of total pancreatectomy and autologous islet transplantation in children has been excellent including quality of life.

Split versus living-related adult liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND-OBJECTIVE

The outcomes of split liver transplantation between recipients of deceased donor split liver transplant (SLT) or live donor liver transplants (LDLT) have never been compared in meta-analysis. It is important to understand graft and recipient survival between recipients of these grafts.

METHODS

Databases were searched for relevant articles over the previous 20 years (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar). Meta-analyses were performed using both fixed- and random-effects models. Patient survival and graft survival were obtained using the inverse variance hazard ratio method.

RESULTS

There were differences in the characteristics of the donors and recipients. Donors of the SLT were younger compared to LDLT cohort [mean difference (MD) = - 11.12 years (- 15.41 to - 6.84), p < 0.001] whilst recipients of LDLT were younger [MD = - 2.06 years (- 1.12 to - 3.01), p < 0.001]. Significantly fewer men received grafts after SLT, 45%, compared to those receiving LDLT, 55%, [OR = 0.66 (0.55 to 0.80), p < 0.001]. There were no significant differences detected in postoperative complications, graft and patient 1-, 3- and 5-year survival between the SLT and LDLT cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no apparent difference in overall survival, graft survival or complications between recipients of SLT or LDLT. However, characteristics of the donor and recipients differed suggesting the need for adequate risk-adjusted assessment of outcomes.

Feasibility and Safety of Split-Liver Transplantation in a Nascent Framework of Deceased Donation

Split-liver transplantation (SLT) is a valuable option for optimizing the use of good-quality deceased donor grafts. It is not routinely reported outside the West because of limited deceased donor numbers, technical and organizational constraints, lack of experience, and a predominant living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) practice. At our center, 20% of the liver transplantations (LTs) are from deceased donors. We report our experience of SLT and compare outcomes with pediatric and adult LDLT recipients. A prospectively maintained database of all LT recipients between September 2009 and March 2017 was analyzed. Each pediatric SLT recipient was matched to 2 pediatric LDLT recipients for age, weight, urgency, and year of transplant. Each adult SLT recipient was similarly matched to 2 adult LDLT recipients for age, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, and year of transplant. Intraoperative and postoperative parameters, including recovery time, morbidity (biliary and vascular complications, Clavien grade >IIIA complications), and mortality were compared. In total, 40 SLTs were performed after splitting 20 deceased donor livers (in situ, n = 11; hybrid split, n = 3; and ex vivo, n = 6). Recipients included 22 children and 18 adults. There were 18 livers that were split conventionally (extended right lobe and left lateral segment [LLS]), and 2 were right lobe-left lobe SLTs. Also, 3 LLS grafts were used as auxiliary grafts for metabolic liver disease. Perioperative mortality in SLT recipients occurred in 3 patients (2 children and 1 adult). Incidence of vascular, biliary, and Clavien grade >IIIA complications were similar between matched adult and pediatric SLT and LDLT groups. In conclusion, SLT is an effective technique with outcomes comparable to living donor grafts for adult and pediatric recipients. Using SLT techniques at centers with limited deceased donors optimizes the use of good-quality whole grafts and reduces the gap between organ demand and availability.

Designing Triple Adult Liver Grafts From an Ideal Deceased Liver

Splitting deceased donor livers and creating 3 grafts from a whole liver may be feasible and shorten the waiting time for organ donation in patients with high mortality rates. We hypothesized that it might be reasonable to procure 3 grafts for donation from one deceased donor liver by splitting the liver into left (segment II, III, IV), right anterior (segment V, VIII), and right posterior lobes (segment VI, VII) for liver transplantation according to the portal system trifurcated variations. We designed the right anterior branch with the main portal trunk and middle hepatic artery to become inflow of right anterior lobe, the left portal vein and left hepatic artery to become the inflow of left lobe and right posterior branch, and right hepatic artery to become the inflow of right posterior lobe. We retrospectively reviewed the volumetric computed tomography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography of 153 liver donors. The hepatic and portal veins, hepatic artery, and biliary system were reorganized and classified. The volumetric proportions of the liver grafts were measured. Trifurcation of the portal vein variation was found in approximately 13.7% of portal systemic variations. The left lobe accounted for 29.18% of the total liver volume, the right anterior lobe, 35.22%, and the right posterior lobe, 35.6%. We validated this principle by dissecting the explanted liver and identified the triple grafts' weights, percentages, vessels, and biliary ducts system. The splitting of deceased donor livers into 3 split liver grafts for use in liver transplantation surgery can be clinically useful.

Split liver transplantation: Current developments

In 1988, Rudolf Pichlmayr pioneered split liver transplantation (SLT), enabling the transplantation of one donor liver into two recipients - one pediatric and one adult patient. In the same year, Henri Bismuth and colleagues performed the first full right/full left split procedure with two adult recipients. Both splitting techniques were rapidly adopted within the transplant community. However, a SLT is technically demanding, may cause increased perioperative complications, and may potentially transform an excellent deceased donor organ into two marginal quality grafts. Thus, crucial evaluation of donor organs suitable for splitting and careful screening of potential SLT recipients is warranted. Furthermore, the logistic background of the splitting procedure as well as the organ allocation policy must be adapted to further increase the number and the safety of SLT. Under defined circumstances, in selected patients and at experienced transplant centers, SLT outcomes can be similar to those obtained in full organ LT. Thus, SLT is an important tool to reduce the donor organ shortage and waitlist mortality, especially for pediatric patients and small adults. The present review gives an overview of technical aspects, current developments, and clinical outcomes of SLT.

Right lobe split liver graft versus whole liver transplantation: A systematic review by updated traditional and cumulative meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Advancements in surgical techniques and experience of donor-recipient pairing has led to a wider use of right split liver grafts in adults. An update meta-analysis was conducted to compare right split liver graft (RSLG) and whole liver transplantation (WLT) using traditional and cumulative approaches.

METHODS

Databases were searched for relevant articles over the previous 20 years (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar). Meta-analyses were performed using both fixed and random effects models. Patient and graft survival were obtained using the inverse variance hazard ratio method.

RESULTS

Donors were significantly younger in the RSLG group than in the WLT group (MD = -12.06 [-16.29 to -7.83]; P < .001). In addition, the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was significantly lower in the RSLG group than in the WLT group (MD = -2.45 [-4.61 to -.28]; P = .03). However, cold ischaemia time was significantly longer by 1 h in the RSLG group than in the WLT group (MD = 57 [20.63-92.73]; P = .002). Overall biliary, vascular, and outflow tract complications and hepatic artery thrombosis were significantly lower in the WLT group than in the RSLG group (odds ratio [OR] = 1.75 [1.35-2.27], P < .001; OR = 1.91 [1.37-2.65], P = .006; Peto OR = 1.83 [1.19-2.82], P = .006; and Peto OR = 2.07 [1.39-3.10], P = .004, respectively). However, no difference in patient and graft survival was noted between the two cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the RSLG group had a higher postoperative complication rate than the WLT group, equal patient and graft survival benefits were observed.

Liver Transplantation in Children

Liver transplantation (LT) for children has excellent short- and long-term patient and graft survival. LT is a lifesaving procedure in children with acute or chronic liver disease, hepatic tumors, and a few genetic metabolic diseases in which it can significantly improve quality of life. In this article, the authors discuss the unique aspects of pediatric LT, including the indications, patient selection and evaluation, allocation, transplant surgery and organ selection, posttransplant care, prognosis, adherence, and transition of care.

Challenges and future developments in liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) has become the treatment of choice for a wide range of liver diseases in both adult and pediatric patients. Until recently, the largest proportion of LT in adults, were performed in patients with hepatitis C (HCV) related cirrhosis. The recent availability of safe and effective direct antiviral agents to cure HCV infection in almost all patients whatever the HCV genotype and severity of liver disease, will reduce the need for LT in this category of recipients. Thus, it is presumed that in the next 1 to 2 decades HCV related liver disease will diminish substantially, whereas non-alcoholic steato-hepatitis (NASH) will correspondingly escalate as an indication for LT. The greatest challenges facing LT remain the limited supply of donor organs, and the need for chronic immunosuppression, which represent the true obstacles to the greater application and durable success of the LT procedure. This review aimed to highlight, in different sections, the main open issues and future developments in LT. These will be focused to explore current and future strategies to maximize the use of limited organs, to offer an update on potential new approaches to immunosuppression and to imagine new indications for LT when the number of patients awaiting transplants for HCV related liver disease is reduced.

Clinical outcomes of right-lobe split-liver versus orthotopic liver transplants from donors more than 70 years old

Context-The imbalance between the organ supply and the number of potential transplant recipients led to consideration of expanded-criteria liver donors. Objective-To compare right-lobe split-liver transplants (RL-SLTs) with orthotopic liver transplants (OLTs) from donors more than 70 years old (OLT-O) and OLTs from donors less than 55 years old (OLT-Y). Methods-Seventy-one patients who received an RL-SLT were matched for age, sex, and Model for End-stage Liver Disease score with 71 patients who underwent OLT-O and 142 patients who underwent OLT-Y. Clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Results-Longer operation time was associated with RL-SLT (P< .001) as well as more blood loss (P= .03) and transfusions (P= .05). Postoperative morbidity was less in the OLT-Y group, with a lower rate of grades III to IV Clavien-Dindo complication (30%), compared with values in OLT-O (52%) and RL-SLT (38%). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated better 1-year and 3-year survival rates in the OLT-Y group (97% and 92%, respectively), compared with 92% and 86.3%, respectively, in the RL-SLT group; and 84.5% and 73%, respectively, in the OLT-O group (P = .03). Kaplan-Meier analysis also demonstrated differences between the groups in terms of 1-year and 3-year graft survival rates, which were 92% and 86%, respectively, in OLT-Y; 77% and 66%, respectively, in the OLT-O, and 84.2% and 76.6%, respectively, in the RL-SLT group (P= .01). Conclusion-Even if OLT-Y guarantees better patient and graft survival, both RL-SLT and OLT-O can be used safely to expand the pool of liver donors, showing acceptable clinical results and complications rates.

Fighting Mortality in the Waiting List: Liver Transplantation in North America, Europe, and Asia

Liver disease is a major cause of mortality worldwide. Liver transplantation (LT) is the most effective treatment for end stage liver disease. Available resources and social circumstances have led to different ways of implementing LT around the world. The experience with pediatric LT corroborates the hypothesis that a combination of surgical strategies can be beneficial. The goal of this manuscript is to describe the strategies used by LT centers in North America, Europe and Asia and how these strategies can be applied to reduce waitlist mortality and increase access to LT.

Outcomes of left split graft transplantation in Europe: report from the European Liver Transplant Registry

Split liver transplantation (SLT) has been widely adopted across Europe, resulting in remarkable reduction in the paediatric waiting-list mortality. Left split graft (LSG) is commonly used for paediatric recipients; however, deceased donor criteria selection are not universal. The aim of this study was to analyse the LSG outcome from the European Liver Transplant Registry and to identify risk factors for graft failure. Data from 1500 children transplanted in 2006-2014 with LSG from deceased donors were retrospectively analysed. Overall, graft losses were 343(22.9%) after 5 years from transplantation, 240(70.0%) occurred within the first 3 months. Estimated patient survival was 89.1% at 3 months and 82.9% at 5 years from SLT. Re-transplantation rate was 11.5%. At multivariable analysis, significant risk factors for graft failure at 3 months included the following: urgent SLT (HR = 1.73, P = 0.0012), recipient body weight ≤6 kg (HR = 1.91, P = 0.0029), donor age >50 years (HR = 1.87, P = 0.0039), and cold ischaemic time (CIT) [HR = 1.07 per hour, P = 0.0227]. LSG has good outcomes and SLT is excellent option for paediatric recipients in the current organ shortage era. We identified practical guidelines for LSG donor and recipient selection criteria: donor age may be safely extended up to 50 years in the absence of additional risk factors; thus, children <6 kg and urgent transplantation need CIT <6 h and appropriate graft/recipient size-matching to achieve good outcomes.

[Pioneering surgical innovations in Germany : Part 1: generation of medical evidence]

BACKGROUND

In recent years research which conforms to evidence-based medicine (EBM) has been required even in surgery. Prospective, randomized studies are carried out in order to provide justification for the benefits of new procedures.

OBJECTIVE

The acquisition of special features in surgery with respect to the application of EBM.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The investigation period selected was from1933 to 2013; therefore, all disciplines within the German Society of Surgery were questioned on the achievement of revolutionary innovations. The investigation was carried out utilizing personal interviews and a questionnaire. Only novel methods which were developed in Germany were considered. The survey was completed by carrying out research in database files.

RESULTS

During the past 80 years 15 pioneering innovations have been published in surgical research, although the prerequisites of EBM were only partly met. They appear to be based on the lowest level of evidence as these methods were mostly published as case reports or case series in journals with a low impact factor.

DISCUSSION

In general, innovative surgical procedures through top level research are still being published in the form of case reports or case series. This allows a rapid distribution of research results to the surgical community. Controlled studies still do not represent an alternative for the introduction of pioneering surgical innovations.

The impact of intercenter sharing on the outcomes of pediatric split liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Split liver transplantation allows for expansion of the pool of organs available for pediatric liver transplantation. The impact of sharing segments of the same liver between centers has not been studied.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of 24 pediatric split liver transplant cases in a recent cohort. We evaluated the outcomes of pediatric recipients who shared organs with adult patients in our own center (group A) compared to recipients who shared organs with adult patients in other centers. (group B).

RESULTS

One-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival for group A was 100%, 100%, and 100% vs 83%, 71%, and 57% for group B (P = .039). Postoperative complications included biliary complications (41.7% in group A vs 50% in group B, P = .682), vascular complications (8.3% in group A vs 41.7% in group B, P = .059), and postoperative bleeding (16.7% in group A vs 25% in group B, P = .615). High-grade Clavien-Dindo complications were 0% in group A vs 33.3% in group B, P = .028.

CONCLUSIONS

Organ sharing between centers appears to be associated with significantly poorer graft survival. Possible explanations include greater procurement-related injury or suboptimal vessel distribution. Future larger studies focused on this area may be helpful to formulate policy considerations.

In Situ Splitting of the Cadaver Liver for Two Adult Recipients by LDLT Technique

BACKGROUND

To expand the donor pool, split liver transplantation is conventionally performed for one adult and one pediatric recipient. Application of this technique for two adult recipients can produce remarkable impact on the waiting list. Proper donor and recipient selection is crucial for the favorable outcome following full-right and full-left liver split. Right lobe adult to adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is essentially a full right and full left split. However, LDLT techniques have not been used for full right and left split.

METHODS

We performed in situ splitting of the whole liver using LDLT techniques from a hemodynamically stable young deceased donor and transplanted into two adult recipients, both with model for end-stage liver disease score of 17. The transection was carried out through the midplane of liver, generating a right lobe and a left lobe graft.

RESULTS

Both the recipients had uneventful postoperative recovery. At ten months of follow up, both the recipients are doing well with good liver function.

CONCLUSION

Based on the concept of living related liver transplantation, our case explores the technical feasibility of full-right and full-left in situ liver split.

Early complications after liver transplantation in children and adults: Are split grafts equal to each other and equal to whole livers?

Split-liver transplantation (LT) allows transplantation of two recipients from one deceased donor, thereby increasing pool of grafts. However, split LT may be hampered by technical problems, and split grafts are still considered suboptimal organs in some centres. We analysed the outcomes in split- and whole-liver recipients in a combined adult-to-paediatric transplantation programme. Records of paediatric and adult patients having undergone LT from 1999 to 2013 were analysed retrospectively. All splits were performed in situ. Adult split-graft recipients were matched 1:2 with whole-graft recipients (matching criteria: BMI, MELD, year of transplantation, age), and matched to the paediatric recipient transplanted from the same donor. Post-LT complications were classified according to the Clavien scale. Among children, 32 split- and 31 whole-graft recipients were analysed. Among adults, 20 split- and 40 matched whole-graft recipients were analysed. In both populations, the post-operative complications did not differ between split- and whole-graft recipients. There was no difference in 1-year graft and patient survival between split- and whole-graft recipients in paediatric (90% vs. 97%, 94% vs. 97%, respectively) and in adult recipients (89% in both, 89% vs. 92%, respectively). In the analysis of both recipients issued from the same donor, there was no association in the prevalence and severity of complications. A case-by-case analysis showed that split mortality was unrelated to LT in all but one patient (small-for-size left split graft). In the setting of careful donor selection, recipient matching and surgical skill, in situ split LT is an effective and safe technique to increase the number of available organs, and split livers should no longer considered marginal grafts.

Left Lobe Auxiliary Liver Transplantation for End-stage Hepatitis B Liver Cirrhosis

Auxiliary liver transplantation (ALT) for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver cirrhosis previously showed poor results, because the native liver was a significant source of HBV recurrence and the graft could be rapidly destroyed by HBV infection in an immunosuppressive condition. Four patients with HBV-related liver cirrhosis were unable to undergo orthotopic liver transplantation because the only available grafts of left lobe were too small. Under entecavir-based anti-HBV treatment, they underwent ALT in which the recipient left liver was removed and the small left lobe graft was implanted in the corresponding space. The mean graft weight/recipient weight was 0.49% (range, 0.38%-0.55%). One year after transplantation, the graft sizes were increased to 273% and the remnant livers were decreased to 44%. Serum HBV DNA was persistently undetectable. Periodic graft biopsy showed no signs of tissue injury and negative immunostaining for hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis B core antigen. After a mean follow-up period of 21 months, all patients live well with normal graft function. Our study suggests that ALT for HBV-related liver cirrhosis is feasible under entecavir-based anti-HBV treatment. Successful application of small left livers in end-stage liver cirrhosis may significantly increase the pool of left liver grafts for adult patients.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: outcomes and novel surgical approaches

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the best treatment option for patients with early-stage tumours and accounts for ∼20-40% of all liver transplantations performed at most centres worldwide. The Milan criteria are the most common criteria to select patients with HCC for transplantation but they can be seen as too restrictive. Several proposals have been made for a moderate expansion of the criteria, which result in good outcomes but with an increase in the risk of tumour recurrence. In this Review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the outcomes after liver transplantation for HCC, focusing on tumour recurrence in terms of surveillance, prevention and treatment. Additionally, novel surgical techniques have been developed to increase the available pool of organs for liver transplantation (such as living donor liver transplantation, donation after circulatory death and split livers), but the effect of these techniques on patients with HCC is still under debate. Thus, we will describe these techniques and expose the benefits and disadvantages of each surgical approach. Finally, we will comment on the limitations of the current priority policies for liver transplantation and the need to further refine them to better serve the population.

Treatment of Wilson's disease

Wilson's disease is an autosomal recessive disorder of copper metabolism, whose prevalence in the general population is 1/30000. Common manifestations are hepatic and neuropsychiatric, and in children, hepatic symptoms are most common. Copper chelating agents are effective in most cases, except for those who suffer from decompensated cirrhosis or fulminant liver disease. Liver transplantation, especially liver related living transplantation that has confirmed to be an effective method, has increasingly become a main method for treating children with late stage Wilson's disease.

Effects of recipient size and allograft type on pediatric liver transplantation for biliary atresia

The majority of pediatric patients with end-stage liver disease receive a transplant with a whole liver (WL) allograft. However, smaller recipients with biliary atresia (BA) may have improved outcomes with deceased donor partial liver (DDPL) or living donor allografts. This study compares the national outcomes for liver transplantation in BA, with attention to the interaction between liver allograft type and recipient size. From January 2, 2002 to December 30, 2014, 2123 pediatric patients underwent a primary liver transplant for BA. The majority of transplants (53%) were performed with a WL allograft. Utilization of a WL allograft increased from 42% of recipients weighing ≤ 7 kg to 74% of recipients weighing > 14 kg. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year graft survival in recipients weighing ≤7 kg was significantly superior for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) (91%, 88%, 84%) and DDPL allografts (90%, 84%, 77%) compared with WL allografts (79%, 75%, 74%; P = 0.005). The 1-, 5-, and 10-year graft survival in recipients weighing >14 kg trended toward being inferior in recipients of DDPL allografts (85%, 85%, 71%) compared with WL allografts (96%, 91%, 86%; P = 0.06). Furthermore, the incidence of vascular thrombosis was highest in WL (13%) compared with LDLT (6%) and DDPL (5%) recipients ≤ 7 kg (P = 0.002). Liver retransplantation was also highest in WL (16%) compared with LDLT (9%) and DDPL (9%) recipients ≤ 7 kg (P = 0.02). In conclusion, strong consideration should be given to the use of technical variant allografts in small recipients with BA requiring liver transplantation. Liver Transplantation 23 221-233 2017 AASLD.

Recent advances in understanding and managing liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) has been established as the most effective treatment modality for end-stage liver disease over the last few decades. Currently, patient and graft survival after LT are excellent, with 1- and 5-year survival of 90% and 80%, respectively. However, the timing of referral to LT is crucial for improving survival benefit and outcome. The current shortage of donors and the increasing demand for LT currently lengthen the waiting time. Thus, waiting list mortality is about 10–15%, according to the geographical area. For this reason, over the last several years, alternatives to deceased donor LT and new options for prioritizing patients on the waiting list have been proposed.

Using on-site liver 3-D reconstruction and volumetric calculations in split liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Split liver transplantation increases the number of grafts available for transplantation. Pre-recovery assessment of liver graft volume is essential for selecting suitable recipients. The purpose of this study was to determine the ability and feasibility of constructing a 3-D model to aid in surgical planning and to predict graft weight prior to an in situ division of the donor liver.

METHODS

Over 11 months, 3-D volumetric reconstruction of 4 deceased donors was performed using Pathfinder Scout© liver volumetric software. Demographic, laboratory, operative, perioperative and survival data for these patients along with donor demographic data were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The average predicted weight of the grafts from the adult donors obtained from an in situ split procedure were 1130 g (930-1458 g) for the extended right lobe donors and 312 g (222-396 g) for left lateral segment grafts. Actual adult graft weight was 92% of the predicted weight for both the extended right grafts and the left lateral segment grafts. The predicted and actual graft weights for the pediatric donors were 176 g and 210 g for the left lateral segment grafts and 308 g and 280 g for the extended right lobe grafts, respectively. All grafts were transplanted except for the right lobe from the pediatric donors due to the small graft weight.

CONCLUSIONS

On-site volumetric assessment of donors provides useful information for the planning of an in situ split and for selection of recipients. This information may expand the donor pool to recipients previously felt to be unsuitable due to donor and/or recipient weight.

Split liver transplantation in adults

Split liver transplantation (SLT), while widely accepted in pediatrics, remains underutilized in adults. Advancements in surgical techniques and donor-recipient matching, however, have allowed expansion of SLT from utilization of the right trisegment graft to now include use of the hemiliver graft as well. Despite less favorable outcomes in the early experience, better outcomes have been reported by experienced centers and have further validated the feasibility of SLT. Importantly, more than two decades of experience have identified key requirements for successful SLT in adults. When these requirements are met, SLT can achieve outcomes equivalent to those achieved with other types of liver transplantation for adults. However, substantial challenges, such as surgical techniques, logistics, and ethics, persist as ongoing barriers to further expansion of this highly complex procedure. This review outlines the current state of SLT in adults, focusing on donor and recipient selection based on physiology, surgical techniques, surgical outcomes, and ethical issues.

Pediatric liver transplantation: Personal perspectives on historical achievements and future challenges

This review presents the author's personal perspective and contributions to the first steps, the development, the current status, and the remaining issues of pediatric liver transplantation (LT). Innumerable children around the world who have undergone LT have reached adulthood. The techniques have reached maturity. As shown by my own group's experience, grafts donated by living donors might provide the best short-term and longterm results. Debate persists about the optimal immunosuppression (IS), although the place of tacrolimus remains unchallenged. Tolerance induction protocols aiming to induce microchimerism have been tried in clinical transplantation without convincing results. Withdrawal of maintenance IS is possible in some children who underwent liver transplantation who have excellent clinical status and normal liver function tests but is not without risk of rejection and subsequent worsening of histology. The current trend favored by the Brussels' group is to minimize IS as soon after transplant as possible, aiming to obtain a state of "prope" or "almost" tolerance. Liver grafts are threatened in the long term by increasing hepatitis-related fibrosis, resulting most likely from immunological assault. Nowadays, the focus is on the longterm survival, quality of life (growth, academic performance, employment, self-fulfillment, fertility, raising a family, etc.), induction of tolerance, prevention of risks bound to decades of IS (nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity, cardiovascular risk, de novo malignancies, etc.), and prevention of graft fibrosis. All these issues are fertile fields for younger scientists. Liver Transplantation 22 1284-1294 2016 AASLD.