Practice parameters for sigmoid diverticulitis. The Standards Task Force American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons

Advanced age is an independent predictor for increased morbidity and mortality after emergent surgery for diverticulitis

BACKGROUND

The objectives of our study were to determine the association between age and postoperative outcomes after emergency surgery for diverticulitis and to identify risk factors for postoperative mortality among elderly patients.

METHODS

All patients from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2005-2009 Participant User Files undergoing emergent surgery for diverticulitis were included. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the association between age and postoperative morbidity and mortality after adjustment for perioperative variables. A separate regression model was used to determine risk factors for postoperative mortality among elderly patients, with specific postoperative complications being included as potential predictors.

RESULTS

We included 2,264 patients for analysis, of whom 1,267 (56%) were <65 years old (nonelderly), 648 (28.6%) were 65-79 years old (elderly), and 349 (15.4%) were ≥80 years old (super-elderly). Advanced age was a significant predictor of 30-day postoperative mortality, and to a lesser extent postoperative morbidity. Among those patients ≥65 years old, super-elderly age classification remained a significant predictor of mortality after adjustment for the presence or absence of postoperative complications. Mortality among elderly and super-elderly patients was greatest in the setting of specific complications, such as septic shock, prolonged postoperative mechanical ventilation, and acute renal failure.

CONCLUSION

Advanced age is an independent risk factor for death after emergency surgery for diverticulitis, with mortality being greatest among elderly patients who experience certain postoperative complications. Prevention of these complications should form the cornerstone of initiatives designed to lower the mortality associated with emergency surgery in elderly patients.

Randomized clinical trial of antibiotics in acute uncomplicated diverticulitis

BACKGROUND

The standard of care for acute uncomplicated diverticulitis today is antibiotic treatment, although there are no controlled studies supporting this management. The aim was to investigate the need for antibiotic treatment in acute uncomplicated diverticulitis, with the endpoint of recovery without complications after 12 months of follow-up.

METHODS

This multicentre randomized trial involving ten surgical departments in Sweden and one in Iceland recruited 623 patients with computed tomography-verified acute uncomplicated left-sided diverticulitis. Patients were randomized to treatment with (314 patients) or without (309 patients) antibiotics.

RESULTS

Age, sex, body mass index, co-morbidities, body temperature, white blood cell count and C-reactive protein level on admission were similar in the two groups. Complications such as perforation or abscess formation were found in six patients (1·9 per cent) who received no antibiotics and in three (1·0 per cent) who were treated with antibiotics (P = 0·302). The median hospital stay was 3 days in both groups. Recurrent diverticulitis necessitating readmission to hospital at the 1-year follow-up was similar in the two groups (16 per cent, P = 0·881).

CONCLUSION

Antibiotic treatment for acute uncomplicated diverticulitis neither accelerates recovery nor prevents complications or recurrence. It should be reserved for the treatment of complicated diverticulitis.

Challenging a classic myth: pneumoperitoneum associated with acute diverticulitis is not an indication for open or laparoscopic emergency surgery in hemodynamically stable patients. A 10-year experience with a nonoperative treatment

BACKGROUND

In patients presenting with acute diverticulitis (AD) and signs of acute peritonitis, the presence of extradigestive air (EDA) on a computer tomography (CT) scan is often considered to indicate the need for emergency surgery. Although the traditional management of "perforated" AD is open sigmoidectomy, more recently, laparoscopic drainage/lavage (usually followed by delayed elective sigmoidectomy) has been reported. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the results of nonoperative management of emergency patients presenting with AD and EDA.

METHODS

The outcomes of 39 consecutive hemodynamically stable patients (23 men, mean age = 54.7 years) who were admitted with AD and EDA and were managed nonoperatively (antibiotic and supportive treatment) at a tertiary-care university hospital between January 2001 and June 2010 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. These included morbidity (Clavien-Dindo) and treatment failure (need for emergency surgery or death). A univariate analysis of clinical, radiological, and laboratory criteria with respect to treatment failure was performed. Results of delayed elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy were also analyzed.

RESULTS

There was no mortality. Thirty-six of the 39 patients (92.3%) did not need surgery (7 patients required CT-guided abscess drainage). Mean hospital stay was 8.1 days. Duration of symptoms, previous antibiotic administration, severe sepsis, PCR level, WBC concentration, and the presence of abdominal collection were associated with treatment failure, whereas "distant" location of EDA and free abdominal fluid were not. Five patients had recurrence of AD and were treated medically. Seventeen patients (47.2%) underwent elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for which mean operative time was 246 min (range = 100-450) and the conversion rate was 11.8%. Mortality was nil and the morbidity rate was 41.2%. Mean postoperative stay was 7.1 days (range = 4-23).

CONCLUSIONS

Nonoperative management is a viable option in most emergency patients presenting with AD and EDA, even in the presence of symptoms of peritonitis or altered laboratory tests. Delayed laparoscopic sigmoidectomy may be useless in certain cases and its results poorer than expected.

Elective laparoscopic versus open colectomy for diverticulosis: an analysis of ACS-NSQIP database

BACKGROUND

The benefits of laparoscopic (LC) versus open (OC) colectomy for symptomatic colonic diverticulosis as an elective operation remain unclear.

METHODS

Using the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) participant-user file, patients were identified who underwent elective colon resection for symptomatic colonic diverticulosis, between 2005 and 2008. Demographic, clinical, intraoperative variables, and 30-day morbidity and mortality were collected. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between the surgical approach (LC vs. OC) and risk-adjusted overall mortality, overall morbidity, serious morbidity, and wound complications.

RESULTS

A total of 7,629 patients were identified who underwent colon resection for symptomatic diverticulosis. They were subdivided into two groups: OC (3,870 (50.7%)) and LC (3,759 (49.3%)). Patients who underwent OC were significantly older (59.0 vs. 55.7 years, P < 0.0001) with more comorbidities compared with those who underwent LC. After risk-adjusted analysis, it was noted that the patients treated with LC were significantly less likely to experience overall morbidity (11.9% vs. 23.2%), serious morbidity (4.6% vs. 10.9%), and wound complications (9.1% vs. 17.5%), but not mortality (0.3% vs. 0.8%). Operative duration was significantly longer with LC (176.64 vs. 166.70 min, P < 0.0001), but the length of stay was significantly shorter (4.77 vs. 7.68 days, P < 0.0001). Using logistic regression analysis, patients with history of peripheral vascular disease, percutaneous coronary interventions, current steroid use, and hypertension requiring medication were at an increased risk of morbidity and mortality at 30 days. Patients with history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and smoking experienced more wound complications at 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS

In the elective setting for symptomatic diverticulosis, LC seems to be associated with lower 30-day morbidity and complication rates compared with OC.

Multicentre observational study of the natural history of left-sided acute diverticulitis

BACKGROUND

The natural history of acute diverticulitis (AD) is still unclear. This study investigated the recurrence rate, and the risks of emergency surgery, associated stoma and death following initial medical or surgical treatment of AD.

METHODS

The Italian Study Group on Complicated Diverticulosis conducted a 4-year multicentre retrospective and prospective database analysis of patients admitted to hospital for medical or surgical treatment of AD and then followed for a minimum of 9 years. The persistence of symptoms, recurrent episodes of AD, new hospital admissions, medical or surgical treatment, and their outcome were recorded during follow-up.

RESULTS

Of 1046 patients enrolled at 17 centres, 743 were eligible for the study (407 recruited retrospectively and 336 prospectively); 242 patients (32·6 per cent) underwent emergency surgery at accrual. After a mean follow-up of 10·7 years, rates of recurrence (17·2 versus 5·8 per cent; P < 0·001) and emergency surgery (6·9 versus 1·3 per cent; P = 0·021) were higher for medically treated patients than for those treated surgically. Among patients who had initial medical treatment, age less than 40 years and a history of at least three episodes of AD were associated with an increased risk of AD recurrence. There was no association between any of the investigated parameters and subsequent emergency surgery. The risk of stoma formation was below 1 per cent and disease-related mortality was zero in this group. The disease-related mortality rate was 0·6 per cent among patients who had surgical treatment.

CONCLUSION

Long-term risks of recurrent AD or emergency surgery were limited and colectomy did not fully protect against recurrence.

Timing of elective surgery for diverticular disease

The timing of elective surgery for the treatment of diverticular disease is constantly evolving. Historically, the indications for elective surgery were relatively consistent. It was recommended that patients undergo elective resection after two documented attacks of uncomplicated diverticulitis or after one attack of complicated diverticulitis in which the patient did not require emergent surgery. There were some exceptions to these guidelines; people <50 years old could undergo elective resection after their first attack, and patients who had previous solid organ transplants could undergo resection after a single attack. In this article, the author updates the data regarding the timing of surgery in elective diverticular disease and challenges surgical dogma.

Laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis: a prospective study

Results of this study suggest that laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease is a safe, feasible, and effective management strategy.

Background:

Surgical treatment of complicated colonic diverticular disease is still debatable. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the outcome of laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy in patients with diverticulitis. Patients offered laparoscopic surgery presented with acute complicated diverticulitis (Hinchey type I, II, III), chronically recurrent diverticulitis, bleeding, or sigmoid stenosis caused by chronic diverticulitis.

Method:

All patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy within a 12-year period were prospectively entered into a database registry. One-stage laparoscopic resection and primary anastomosis constituted the planned procedure. A 4-trocar approach with suprapubic minilaparotomy was performed. Main data recorded were age, sex, postoperative pain, return of bowel function, operation time, duration of hospital stay, and early and late complications.

Results:

During the study period, 260 sigmoid colectomies were performed for diverticulitis. The cohort included 104 male and 156 female patients; M to F ratio was 4:6. Postoperative pain was controlled by NSAIDs or weak opioid analgesia. Fifteen patients (5.7%) required conversion from laparoscopic to open colectomy. The most common reasons for conversion were directly related to the inflammatory process, abscess, and peritonitis. Mean operative time was 130±54. Average postoperative hospital stay was 10±3 days. A longer hospital stay was recorded for Hinchey type IIb patients. Complications were recorded in 30 patients (11.5%). The most common complications that required reoperation were hemorrhage in 2 patients (0.76) and anastomotic leak in 5 patients (only 3 of them required reoperation). The mortality among them was 2 patients (0.76%).

Conclusions:

Laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease is safe, feasible, and effective. Therefore, laparoscopic colectomy has replaced open resection as standard surgery for recurrent and complicated diverticulitis at our institution.

Comparative study of the clinical features and treatment for right and left colonic diverticulitis

Purpose

Colonic diverticulitis is an uncommon disease in Korea, but the incidence of the disease is increasing. The right colon is the more preferred site for diverticulitis in Korea, but the incidence of left diverticulitis is increasing. Therefore, comparing the clinical features and treatments for right diverticulitis with those for left diverticulitis may help us to treat the disease more properly.

Methods

This study was performed retrospectively by reviewing the medical records of 96 patients with colonic diverticulitis, in whom either conservative or operative treatments were performed.

Results

Eighty-six patients had right diverticulitis (RD), and 10 patients had left diverticulitis (LD). The mean age of the patients was older for LD. Sixteen patients (18.6%) with RD had complications, and 7 patients (8.1%) underwent operations. On the other hand, 4 patients (40%) with LD had complications, and 3 patients (30%) underwent operations. The rates of complications and operations among old-aged patients were higher. The operations for 7 patients with RD who underwent surgery were 6 ileocecectomies and 1 diverticulectomy. On the other hand, the operations for the 3 patients with LD who underwent surgery were 2 resections and anastomoses and 1 diverticulectomy. The reasons for the operations were abscess formation, recurrence, perforation, and development of generalized peritonitis without response to conservative treatment.

Conclusion

The incidence of LD is lower than that of RD in Korea, but the rate of complications and operations seems higher in LD. Therefore, patients who complain of left lower abdominal pain need to be thoroughly examined for LD.

Elective laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticular disease has fewer complications than conventional surgery: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We performed a meta-analysis of published literature comparing the complications after open and laparoscopic elective sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched from January 1991 to March 2009. A systematic review was performed to obtain a summative outcome.

RESULTS

Nineteen comparative studies involving 2,383 patients were analyzed. There were 1,014 patients in the laparoscopic group and 1,369 patients in the open group. There was no significant heterogeneity among any of the complications analyzed. Patients in the laparoscopic sigmoid resection group had fewer wound infections (fixed effects model: risk ratio [RR], .54; 95% confidence interval [CI], .36-.80; z, -3.05; P < .01; random effects model: RR, .59; 95% CI, .39-.89; z, -2.54; P < .05), blood transfusions (fixed effects model: RR, .25; 95% CI, .10-.60; z, -3.10; P < .01; random effects model: RR, .28; 95% CI, .11-.68; z, -2.81; P < .01), and ileus rates (fixed effects model: RR, .37; 95% CI, .20-.66; z, -3.34; P = .001; random effects model: RR, .37; 95% CI, .20-.68; z, -3.21; P = .001) compared with open sigmoid resections. No difference was seen for medical complications, need for rehospitalization, and reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic sigmoid resection is safe and has fewer postoperative surgical complications. This approach should be considered for elective cases, however, more randomized controlled trials are required to strengthen the evidence.

Laparoscopic management of diverticular disease

Laparoscopy surgery has achieved wide acceptance for the treatment of benign disease of the colon. A review of the literature regarding the indications, surgical technique, and outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease is presented.

Diverticulitis in California from 1995 to 2006: Increased Rates of Treatment for Younger Patients

Colonic diverticular disease is responsible for over 300,000 admissions and expenditures exceeding $2.7 billion/year. There is recent evidence that rates of treatment for diverticulitis have increased in the United States over the last decade. We hypothesize that these national trends of increasing rates of hospitalizations for diverticulitis would be found in an analysis of a single-state discharge database. Data from the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development were used to analyze treatment for diverticulitis in California from 1995 to 2006. For each hospitalization, surgical care was determined based on procedure codes for left colon resection and/or colostomy. Overall numbers of admissions for acute diverticulitis increased throughout the 12-year study period with an estimated annual percentage of change (EAPC) of 2.1 per cent (P < 0.001). Rates of admissions increased most rapidly in patients 20 to 34-years-old (EAPC = 8.6%, P < 0.001) and 35 to 49 years old (EAPC = 5.7%, P < 0.001). Elective colectomies had an EAPC of 2.1 per cent (P < 0.001), which was also most dramatic in younger age groups. Between 1995 and 2006 we found significant increases in both the rates of hospitalization for diverticulitis and rates of elective surgical treatment in California. These increases are entirely due to higher rates of care for younger patients.

Surgical practice: evidence or anecdote

OBJECTIVES

Our objective is to highlight a few surgical practices that are not based on evidence but are still taught in surgical education, and to assess our experience with these practices.

DESIGN

We identified 3 practices (clamping of nasogastric tubes before removal, bowel preparation before elective colon resection, and elective sigmoid colectomy following 2 bouts of diverticulitis), identified the data supporting each practice, and administered a survey to faculty and residents at our institution.

SETTING

Wright State University Department of Surgery, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-one faculty and 35 residents responded to the survey.

RESULTS

No studies were found relating to clamping nasogastric tubes before removal. Seven faculty (33%) and 11 residents (31%) used this practice. Two faculty (10%) and 0 residents felt this was an evidence-based practice. Faculty were more likely to have reviewed the evidence (85% vs 40%, p < 0.001). Level 2 evidence has shown bowel preparation did not improve outcomes relating to anastomotic leak, wound infection, or septic complications in elective colon resection. Twenty faculty (95%) and 34 residents (97%) used this practice. Faculty were more likely to believe this to be evidence-based (85% vs 49%, p = 0.01). There has been no level 1 or 2 evidence showing that sigmoid colectomy following 2 bouts of diverticulitis improves morbidity or mortality. Fourteen faculty (70%) and 26 residents (76%) reported using this practice. Twelve faculty (60%) and 21 residents (60%) felt this was evidence-based.

CONCLUSIONS

Frequent use of surgical practices without evidence support can create a misperception that such practices are evidence-based. Faculty are more likely to change a practice after obtaining continuing medical education, suggesting that residents may need validation by faculty practice of evidence-based procedures before incorporation into their clinical care.

Management of Hinchey II diverticulitis

Colonic diverticulosis can either be asymptomatic or present with complications resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. A key presentation of complicated disease is abscess formation (Hinchey type II). The natural course of this is unclear and therefore treatments range from conservative approach with antibiotics and percutaneous guided drainage (PCD) to surgery. There is no clear consensus on the exact management strategy. A Medline based literature search specifically looking at studies dealing with Hinchey type II diverticulitis and its management was carried out. For comparison, five-year retrospective data of diverticular abscesses from our institution was collected and the outcome analysed. Various studies have looked into this aspect of the disease, elaborating on the significance of the size and location of the abscesses, the role of PCD, recurrence rates and the controversies regarding the need for elective surgery. Conservative treatment with antibiotics alone is effective in a majority of cases with a role for PCD in large safely accessible abscesses. Variable recurrence rates have been reported in literature and elective surgery should be planned for selected groups of patients.

Incidence and risk factors of recurrence after surgery for pathology-proven diverticular disease

Background

Diverticular disease is a common problem in Western countries. Rationale for elective surgery is to prevent recurrent complicated diverticulitis and to reduce emergency procedures. Recurrent diverticulitis occurs in about 10% after resection. The pathogenesis for recurrence is not completely understood. We studied the incidence and risk factors for recurrence and the overall morbidity and mortality of surgical therapy for diverticular disease.

Methods

Medical records of 183 consecutive patients with pathology-proven diverticulitis were eligible for evaluation. Mean duration of follow-up was 7.2 years. Number of preoperative episodes, emergency or elective surgeries, type of operation, level of anastomosis, postoperative complications, persistent postoperative pain, complications associated with colostomy reversal, and recurrent diverticulitis were noted. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the cumulative probability of recurrence. Cox regression was used to identify possible risk factors for recurrence.

Results

The incidence of recurrence was 8.7%, with an estimated risk of recurrence over a 15-year period of 16%. Risk factors associated with recurrence were (younger) age (p < 0.02) and the persistence of postoperative pain (p < 0.005). Persistent abdominal pain after surgery was present in 22%. Eighty percent of patients who needed emergency surgery for acute diverticulitis had no manifestation of diverticular disease prior to surgery. In addition, recurrent diverticulitis was not associated with a higher percentage of emergency procedures.

Conclusion

Estimated risk of recurrence is high and abdominal complaints after surgical therapy for diverticulitis are frequent. Younger age and persistence of postoperative symptoms predict recurrent diverticulitis after resection. The clinical implication of these findings needs further investigation. The results of this study support the careful selection of patients for surgery for diverticulitis.

The Sigma-trial protocol: a prospective double-blind multi-centre comparison of laparoscopic versus open elective sigmoid resection in patients with symptomatic diverticulitis

Backround

Diverticulosis is a common disease in the western society with an incidence of 33–66%. 10–25% of these patients will develop diverticulitis. In order to prevent a high-risk acute operation it is advised to perform elective sigmoid resection after two episodes of diverticulitis in the elderly patient or after one episode in the younger (< 50 years) patient. Open sigmoid resection is still the gold standard, but laparoscopic colon resections seem to have certain advantages over open procedures. On the other hand, a double blind investigation has never been performed. The Sigma-trial is designed to evaluate the presumed advantages of laparoscopic over open sigmoid resections in patients with symptomatic diverticulitis.

Method

Indication for elective resection is one episode of diverticulitis in patients < 50 years and two episodes in patient > 50 years or in case of progressive abdominal complaints due to strictures caused by a previous episode of diverticulits. The diagnosis is confirmed by CT-scan, barium enema and/or coloscopy.

It is required that the participating surgeons have performed at least 15 laparoscopic and open sigmoid resections. Open resection is performed by median laparotomy, laparoscopic resection is approached by 4 or 5 cannula. Sigmoid and colon which contain serosal changes or induration are removed and a tension free anastomosis is created. After completion of either surgical procedure an opaque dressing will be used, covering from 10 cm above the umbilicus to the pubic bone. Surgery details will be kept separate from the patient's notes.

Primary endpoints are the postoperative morbidity and mortality. We divided morbidity in minor (e.g. wound infection), major (e.g. anastomotic leakage) and late (e.g. incisional hernias) complications, data will be collected during hospital stay and after six weeks and six months postoperative. Secondary endpoints are the operative and the postoperative recovery data. Operative data include duration of the operation, blood loss and conversion to laparotomy. Post operative recovery consists of return to normal diet, pain, analgesics, general health (SF-36 questionnaire) and duration of hospital stay.

Discussion

The Sigma-trial is a prospective, multi-center, double-blind, randomized study to define the role of laparoscopic sigmoid resection in patients with symptomatic diverticulitis.

Acute diverticulitis--clinical presentation and differential diagnostics

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical presentation of acute diverticulitis in an emergency department and to characterize the natural history of diverticulitis in the short perspective. Comparisons are made with an important differential diagnosis, nonspecific abdominal pain (NSAP).

METHOD

Patients admitted to our hospital with abdominal pain of up to 7 days' duration were registered prospectively using a detailed schedule for history, symptoms and signs, from 1 February 1997 to 1 June 2000. Of 3349 patients initially included, 3073 (92%) were eligible for follow up after 1-3 years.

RESULTS

Acute diverticulitis was the final diagnosis in 145 patients and NSAP in 1142 patients. The incidence of hospitalized patients with diverticulitis was 47 per year and 100 000 population, with a mean hospital stay of 3.3 days. Patients with diverticulitis, more frequently than NSAP, had a longer history and laboratory signs of inflammatory activity. Isolated left abdominal tenderness was more common in diverticulitis, whereas isolated right abdominal tenderness was more common in NSAP. Duration of symptoms on arrival was independent of age and was not correlated to C-reactive protein, leucocytes or body temperature. Sensitivity of diverticulitis as primary diagnosis was 64% and specificity 97%. Corresponding figures for NSAP were 43% and 90% respectively. Age and gender did not influence diagnostic accuracy or risk of surgery.

CONCLUSION

Diverticulitis differs significantly from NSAP in clinical presentation and laboratory parameters. Sensitivity of primary diagnosis for diverticulitis and NSAP was low.

The impact of uncomplicated and complicated diverticulitis on laparoscopic surgery conversion rates and patient outcomes

BACKGROUND

The aim of this analysis was to determine the impact of complicated and uncomplicated diverticulitis on conversion rates and complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery (LS) for diverticular disease.

METHODS

Between 1993 and 2004, 125 patients underwent LS [91 laparoscopic-assisted (LA) and 34 hand-assisted (HA) colectomy for diverticular disease, 79 uncomplicated and 46 complicated]. Cases not completed laparoscopically were considered converted. Complicated diverticulitis was defined as diverticular disease associated with abscess, fistula, bleeding or stricture.

RESULTS

The mean age was 59 years with 67 (54%) men with a mean follow-up of 23 months. The conversion rate was 26% (33 patients). The only factor independently associated with conversion was a history of previous abdominal surgery (37% vs. 14%, p = 0.004). Among the subset of patients undergoing surgery for uncomplicated diverticulitis, the number of diverticulitis episodes (DE), the time between the first and last DE, and the time between the last DE and surgery, were not significantly associated with conversion. Early complications (<30 days from surgery) occurred in 30 (25%) patients. Twenty-one long-term complications (>30 days from surgery) occurred in 20 patients and the one and two-year cumulative probabilities of these complications were 14% and 22%, respectively. Early complications were significantly higher among patients requiring conversion (44% vs. 24%, p = 0.04) but were not significantly higher among patients with complicated diverticulitis (39% vs. 24%, p = 0.11). The rates of long-term complications were not significantly higher among patients that required conversion or had complicated diverticulitis (one-year rate 23% vs. 11%, p = 0.47; 18% vs. 13%, p = 0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

A previous history of abdominal surgery was associated with a higher conversion rate in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease. Long-term patient outcomes are not adversely impacted by laparoscopic surgery for complicated diverticulitis or laparoscopic surgery requiring conversion to an open procedure.

Outcome of a conservative policy for managing acute sigmoid diverticulitis

Background

A conservative policy for patients presenting with acute sigmoid diverticulitis is associated with a low operation rate, and low overall and operative mortality rates. The long-term consequences of such a policy were investigated.

Methods

Data were collected prospectively for 232 patients with acute sigmoid diverticulitis between 1990 and 2004. Details of all subsequent readmissions were obtained and survival to August 2005 was analysed.

Results

Of the 232 patients admitted, 60 (25·9 per cent) were known to have diverticulosis; in 172 patients it was a new diagnosis. Thirty-eight patients (16·4 per cent) underwent sigmoid resection, with one death. Three elderly patients in whom a decision was made not to operate had perforated diverticulitis at autopsy. Of 191 patients discharged without resection, 35 (18·3 per cent) subsequently underwent sigmoid resection: 26 (13·6 per cent) elective and nine (4·7 per cent) emergency, with one death.

Conclusion

A conservative policy is safe in both the short term and the long term.

Diverticulitis: when and how to operate?

Diverticular disease, and particularly diverticulitis, has increasing incidence in industrialised countries. Diverticular disease can be classified as symptomatic uncomplicated disease, recurrent symptomatic disease, and complicated disease. Conservative or medical management is usually indicated for acute uncomplicated diverticulitis. Indications for surgery include recurrent attacks and complications of the disease. Surgical treatment options have changed considerably over the years along with the inventions of new diagnostic tools and new surgical therapeutic approaches. Indications and timing for surgery of diverticular disease are determined mainly by the stage of the disease. In addition to this major factor, the individual risk factors of the patient along with the course of the disease after conservative or operative therapy do play a big role in decision-making and treatment of this disease. In this context, the purpose of this article is to review the surgical treatment of diverticulitis with regard to indications, timeliness of operative intervention, operative options and techniques, and special circumstances.

Laparoscopic treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis: a retrospective review of 103 cases

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis is commonly accepted in Hinchey cases I and II, whereas it is debated in the case of purulent peritonitis, and not indicated for fecal peritonitis.

METHODS

A single-center experience of 103 patients treated for Hinchey I-III sigmoid diverticulitis was reviewed. One-stage laparoscopic resection and primary anastomosis constituted the planned procedure. Abscesses in patients with Hinchey IIa were drained percutaneously before surgery. Patients with Hinchey III underwent surgery in emergency. A four-trocar approach with left iliac fossa minilaparotomy was used. Fistulas were treated laparoscopically with Harmonic Scalpel dissection.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic treatment was successfully completed for 100 patients. Intraoperative complications occurred in 2.9% of the cases. Postoperative procedure-related morbidity was 8%, occurring mainly in Hinchey I patients. A longer hospital stay was recorded among Hinchey IIb patients treated for colovescical fistula. No mortality was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis in experienced hands can be a safe and effective gold standard procedure also for patients with fistula or purulent peritonitis.

Elective laparoscopic colonic resection for diverticular disease: results of a multicenter study in 179 patients

BACKGROUND

We undertook a retrospective multicenter study of elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis in order to assess the safety and the results of the procedure performed by a large number of surgeons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 1998 and April 1999, the French Society of Laparoscopic Surgery recruited retrospectively 179 patients from 10 surgical units, operated on for elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy. There were 94 men and 85 women with a mean age of 58 years (range, 30-82). The indications for surgery were acute attacks in 123 cases, complicated diverticulitis in 47 cases, and miscellaneous in 9 cases.

RESULTS

The performed procedure was a successful laparoscopic assisted sigmoidectomy in 154 cases (with totally intracorporeal anastomosis in 136 cases and hand-sewn anastomosis via small incision in 18 cases). The mean operation time was 223 min +/- 79 (range, 100-480). There was no mortality and 23 complications occurred in 23 patients (14.9%). Postoperative ileus lasted 2.5 +/- 0.9 days (range, 1-6), and oral intake started after 3.3 +/- 1.3 days (range, 1-12). The mean postoperative stay was 9.3 days (range, 4-50). Conversion to laparotomy was necessary in 25 cases (13.9%). The essential causes of conversion were obesity, severe adhesions, and colonic inflammation. The mean postoperative stay for the 25 converted patients was 13 +/- 8.5 days (range, 7-42).

CONCLUSION

Elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis is feasible and is safe. The complication and mortality rates are similar to those observed after open procedures. For experienced surgical teams, laparoscopic colonic resection is a good approach for selected patients suffering from symptomatic diverticulitis.

Diverticular disease in adolescence

Diverticular disease is rare in the adolescent. Acute diverticulitis is almost never considered as a diagnosis for a young patient presenting with abdominal pain. Unfortunately, unrecognized it may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Also, when present, diverticulitis in the young adult is considered to be more aggressive compared to diverticulitis in older adults. Therefore, it is important to recognize, diagnose and manage diverticular disease appropriately in this age group. In tis chapter we will review the available literature on diverticula disease in the adolescent and young adult, discuss epidemiology, aetiology and pathogenesis and suggest guidelines for diagnosis and management.

Complicated diverticulosis

"Uncomplicated" diverticulitis can be prevented from progressing into "complicated" diverticulitis by early diagnosis and active medical treatment. Complicated diverticulitis develops from a peridiverticular abscess, to a perforation with peritonitis, to fistulation into adjacent viscera, to luminal narrowing by inflammation or stricture formation causing obstruction. Computer tomography (CT) scanning is the diagnostic imaging modality when diverticulitis is suspected and allows percutaneous drainage of peridiverticular abscesses that will enhance the effect of antibiotic therapy with resolution of the acute episode in 75% of patients. Thus, an emergent or urgent operation is converted to an elective operation and a two-stage operative procedure, namely a temporary stoma and a second operation, is avoided. Interventional surgery is urgent for perforation and obstruction. While a Hartmann's resection and temporary colostomy has been the favoured operative procedure, under favourable conditions resection with primary anastomosis is preferable. Although a temporary stoma may be required with primary anastomosis, and hence the procedure is a two-stage one similar to a Hartmann's, the closure of the stoma is less demanding and has a lower morbidity. A single-stage resection and anastomosis is the standard elective treatment for symptomatic fistulas and strictures.

Diverticular disease

Diverticular disease is a common finding in Western countries with an increasing prevalence with age. Many patients with the disorder remain asymptomatic. However, up to 30% of those affected may show clinical signs including pain, bleeding, obstruction, abscess, fistulae and perforation. The purpose of this chapter is to review the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnostic regimens and treatment options for this disorder.

Diverticular Disease

The spectrum of colonic diverticular disease includes asymptomatic diverticulosis, acute and chronic diverticulitis, and diverticular hemorrhage. Most often discovered incidentally on endoscopy or contrast radiography, asymptomatic diverticulosis is best treated by patient education, which focuses on increasing dietary fiber intake. Acute diverticulitis can be managed on either an inpatient or outpatient basis, depending on the severity of the symptoms, with bowel rest and broad spectrum-antibiotics. Surgery is indicated for complications of the acute inflammatory process, including failure of medical treatment, gross perforation, and abscess formation that cannot be resolved by percutaneous drainage. Manifestations of chronic diverticulitis (fistula formation, stricture, and obstruction) are most often treated surgically. Diverticular hemorrhage is most often massive and self-limited. It requires aggressive resuscitation and a thorough evaluation aimed at localizing the bleeding site. Patients whose bleeding stops spontaneously are treated expectantly. Actively bleeding patients whose bleeding site is successfully localized can be initially treated by selective infusion of vasoconstrictive agents. Recurrent or persistent bleeding requires surgical resection.

Laparoscopically assisted anterior resection for diverticular disease: follow-up of 100 consecutive patients

PURPOSE

The objectives of this study were to refine the technique of laparoscopically assisted anterior resection (LAR) for diverticular disease and to analyze the morbidity and mortality rates, and longer term follow-up of the first 100 consecutive patients.

METHODS

Data were collected prospectively, and follow-up was performed by an independent assessor using a standardized questionnaire.

RESULTS

The median duration of surgery was 180 minutes, the median time for passage of flatus was 2 days after surgery, and the median length of hospital stay was 4 days. Overall, the morbidity rate was 21%, and the wound infection rate was 5%. There were no deaths. Eight patients underwent open laparotomy. The rate of complications was significantly greater in the latter group of patients (75%) than in those who underwent laparoscopy (16%, p = 0.002). The comparison between the first 20 cases and the last 20 patients revealed a significantly shorter duration of surgery (median 225 min. vs. 150 min.; p < 0.0001) and decreased length of stay (6 days vs. 4 days, p < 0.0001). Apart from a nonsignificant increase in the length of surgery, there were no differences in other study parameters when comparisons were made between those patients who underwent LAR for complicated diverticular disease and those patients who underwent uncomplicated diverticular disease.

FOLLOW-UP

Ninety patients were available for follow-up at a median time of 37 months. Ninety-three percent of the patients reported that the surgery had improved their symptoms. No patient required hospitalization, and no one was treated with antibiotics for recurrent symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopically assisted anterior resection for diverticular disease has acceptable morbidity and mortality rates and a median postoperative hospital stay of only 4 days. Follow-up investigations revealed no recurrence of diverticulitis, and patients reported satisfaction regarding cosmetic and functional results.