Intraoperative electron and external beam irradiation with or without 5-fluorouracil and maximum surgical resection for previously unirradiated, locally recurrent colorectal cancer

High-dose-rate intraoperative radiotherapy for close or positive margins in patients with locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer

PURPOSE

A high-dose-rate intraoperative radiotherapy (HDR-IORT) technique for rectum cancer was developed and the technique, local failure, and survival were analyzed.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

After the exclusion of metastatic patients, 37 patients were treated with external beam RT, surgery, and HDR-IORT between 1997 and 2000. Primary locally advanced rectum cancer was found in 18 patients and recurrent disease in 19. HDR-IORT was only administered if the resection margins were < or =2 mm. The flexible intraoperative template is a 5-mm-thick pad with 1-cm-spaced parallel catheters. Clips were placed during surgery to define the target area. A dose of 10 Gy was prescribed at a 1 cm depth from the template surface and calculated using standard plans. After treatment, the dose at the clips was calculated using the reconstructed template geometry and the actual treatment dwell times. The median follow-up of surviving patients was 3 years. No patients were lost to follow-up.

RESULTS

Overall, 12 patients (32%) had local recurrence, 5 (14%) of which were in the HDR-IORT field. The 3-year local failure rate for primary tumors and recurrent tumors was 19% and 52%, respectively (p = 0.0042). The 3-year local failure rate was 37% for negative margins and 26% for positive margins (p = 0.51). A high mean dose at the clip (17.3 Gy) was found. The overall survival was significantly different for primary vs. recurrent tumors, stage, and grade.

CONCLUSION

Because of the HDR technique, a high dose at the clips was found, with good local control. More out-of-field than in-field failures were seen. The local failure rate was significantly different for primary vs. recurrent disease.

CT-fluoroscopy guided interstitial brachytherapy with image-based treatment planning for unresectable locally recurrent rectal carcinoma

PURPOSE

The aim of the study is to develop high-dose-rate (HDR) conformal interstitial brachytherapy by means of combined CT-fluoroscopy guidance with CT-based treatment planning for locally recurrent rectal carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Brachytherapy needle insertion was guided with a helical CT scanner providing continuous fluoroscopy reconstruction. A video monitor placed adjacent to the CT gantry simultaneously allowed the operator to see the process of needle insertion. Final CT images were transferred by an online system to the treatment-planning computer, which reconstructed the implant needles and organ contours. The doses in planning target volume were normalized and geometrically optimized. The patients received a brachytherapy dose at 5 Gy twice daily with a hypofractionated accelerated schedule at a total dose of 30-50 Gy with or without external radiation therapy. Eighteen patients were treated with this procedure.

RESULTS

Ten to thirty-six needles (average, 17.3) were successfully placed to the planning target volume in each patient. The average time for CT fluoroscopy was 357 seconds for each procedure. No accident was seen at needle insertion, but 2 patients developed incomplete peroneal nerve palsy after needle removal, but gradually recovered. CT-based treatment planning was faster and more accurate than projection reconstruction with conventional radiograms. Analysis of the dose volume histogram showed conformal dose distribution to the target, while avoiding normal structures.

CONCLUSION

CT fluoroscopy guidance ensures safety and increases the accuracy of needle placement in brachytherapy. Conformal high-dose-rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy with CT-based treatment planning is a method worth considering for locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Intraoperative electron radiotherapy as a component of salvage therapy for patients with colorectal cancer and advanced nodal metastases

PURPOSE

To define the survival rates and relapse patterns in patients with isolated advanced nodal metastases secondary to colorectal cancer, treated with curative intent using aggressive combined-modality treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-eight patients with isolated advanced lymph node metastases secondary to colorectal cancer received intraoperative radiotherapy as part of curative-intent treatment. Forty-seven patients also received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Chemotherapy was delivered concomitantly with EBRT in 35 patients. The median intraoperative radiotherapy dose was 1250 cGy. End points included local failure within the EBRT field, central failure within the intraoperative radiotherapy field, distant metastases, survival, and toxicity.

RESULTS

The median survival time and 5-year survival rate were 35 months and 34%, respectively. At 3 years, the local control and central control rates were 81% and 93%, respectively. Macroscopically complete resection and colonic primary site were predictors of survival and disease control. The median survival time and 5-year survival rate in patients with colonic primary sites and macroscopically complete resection were 53 months and 49%, respectively. Intraoperative radiotherapy-related neuropathy occurred in 3 patients and ureteral fibrosis in 1.

CONCLUSION

With aggressive combined-modality therapy that includes intraoperative radiotherapy, long-term survival is achievable in colorectal cancer patients presenting with nodal relapse or advanced nodal disease. Survival and disease control rates are highest in those without gross residual disease.

Curative potential of multimodality therapy for locally recurrent rectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess the results of multimodality therapy for patients with recurrent rectal cancer and to analyze factors predictive of curative resection and prognostic for overall survival.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Locally recurrent rectal cancer is a difficult clinical problem, and radical treatment options with curative intent are not generally accepted.

METHODS

A total of 394 patients underwent surgical exploration for recurrent rectal cancer. Ninety were found to have unresectable local or extrapelvic disease and 304 underwent resection of the recurrence. The latter patients were prospectively followed to determine long-term survival and factors influencing survival.

RESULTS

Overall 5-year survival was 25%. Curative, negative resection margins were obtained in 45% of patients; in these patients a 5-year survival of 37% was achieved, compared to 16% (P <.001) in patients with either microscopic or gross residual disease. In a logistic regression analysis, initial surgery with end-colostomy and symptomatic pain (both univariate) and increasing number of sites of the recurrent tumor fixation in the pelvis (multivariate) were associated with palliative surgery. Overall survival was significantly decreased for symptomatic pain (P <.001) and more than one fixation (P =.029). Survival following extended resection of adjacent organs was not different from limited resection (28% vs. 21%, P =.11). Patient demographics and factors related to the initial rectal cancer did not affect outcome. Perioperative mortality was only 0.3%, but significant morbidity occurred in 26% of patients, with pelvic abscess being the most common complication.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that many patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer can be resected with negative margins. Long-term survival can be achieved, especially for patients with no symptoms and minimal fixation of the recurrence in the pelvis, provided no gross residual disease remains.

Effects on functional outcome after IORT-containing multimodality treatment for locally advanced primary and locally recurrent rectal cancer

PURPOSE

In the treatment of patients with locally advanced primary or locally recurrent rectal cancer, much attention is focused on the oncologic outcome. Little is known about the functional outcome. In this study, the functional outcome after a multimodality treatment for locally advanced primary and locally recurrent rectal cancer is analyzed.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1994 and 1999, 55 patients with locally advanced primary and 66 patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer were treated with high-dose preoperative external beam irradiation, followed by extended surgery and intraoperative radiotherapy. To assess long-term functional outcome, all patients still alive (n = 97) were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding ongoing morbidity, as well as functional and social impairment. Seventy-six of the 79 patients (96%) returned the questionnaire. The median follow-up was 14 months (range: 4-60 months).

RESULTS

The questionnaire revealed fatigue in 44%, perineal pain in 42%, radiating pain in the leg(s) in 21%, walking difficulties in 36%, and voiding dysfunction in 42% of the patients as symptoms of ongoing morbidity. Functional impairment consisted of requiring help with basic activities in 15% and sexual inactivity in 56% of the respondents. Social handicap was demonstrated by loss of former lifestyle in 44% and loss of professional occupation in 40% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

As a result of multimodality treatment, the majority of these patients have to deal with long-term physical morbidity, the need for help with daily care, and considerable social impairment. These consequences must be weighed against the chance of cure if the patient is treated and the disability eventually caused by uncontrolled tumor progression if the patient is not treated. These potential drawbacks should be discussed with the patient preoperatively and taken into account when designing a treatment strategy.

Pain and quality of life after treatment in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Because survival in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) is limited, pain control and quality of life (QOL) are important parameters. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of posttreatment pain and QOL of patients with LRRC treated with nonsurgical palliation or resection and identify predictors of poor outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Posttreatment pain severity and QOL were prospectively assessed in 45 patients with LRRC using the Brief Pain Inventory and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal questionnaire.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients received nonsurgical palliation, and 30 patients underwent resection of their pelvic tumors. There was a significant association between higher posttreatment pain scores and worse QOL (P <.001). Patients treated with nonsurgical palliation reported moderate to severe pain beyond the third month of treatment. Resected patients reported comparable levels of pain during the first 3 postoperative years, particularly after bony resections; long-term survivors (beyond 3 years), however, reported minimal pain and good QOL. Female sex, pelvic/sciatic pain at presentation, total pelvic exenteration, and bony resection were associated with higher rates of moderate to severe posttreatment pain (P =.04, P <.001, P =.04, and P =.02, respectively). Pain at presentation was an independent predictor of posttreatment pain (odds ratio, 7.4 [95% confidence interval, 1.8 to 30.3]; P =.006).

CONCLUSION

Patients with LRRC treated with nonsurgical palliation or resection experience significant levels of pain after treatment. Close posttreatment pain monitoring is warranted in patients presenting with pelvic pain, and more aggressive pain management strategies may improve posttreatment QOL.

Chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of rectal cancer

The integration of radiotherapy to the adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer was prompted by the predominance of locoregional failures after curative surgery. This characteristic in the pattern of failure is one of the main reasons adjuvant radiotherapy plays a greater role in rectal cancer than in colon cancer. It has been demonstrated that local failure rates after surgery alone for rectal cancer are strongly dependent on the degree of bowel wall invasion, lymph node involvement, and margins of resection. These same locoregional factors are also predictive of distant metastasis and survival. In addition, local failure is associated with devastating symptoms that severely affect the quality of life of patients. For these reasons, locoregional control remains a major issue in the treatment of rectal cancer. This article summarizes the evidence that has established chemoradiotherapy as part of the standard of care for rectal cancer and the techniques used for its delivery.

Intraoperative radiation therapy for patients with recurrent rectal and sigmoid colon cancer in previously irradiated fields

A retrospective study evaluated 15 patients with pelvic recurrence of colorectal cancer in a previously irradiated region who received intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) as part of salvage therapy. Total prior external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) doses ranged from 45 to 79.2 Gy. Tumor resection was accomplished in 14 patients, with an exenteration performed in seven. IORT dose was 15-20 Gy. Three patients received additional EBRT as a post-operative course of 25.2 Gy in 14 fractions. Actuarial 3-year local control rate was 25%. The 3-year overall survival rate was 29%. Patients with fixed and/or bulky pelvic tumors had a local control rate of 19% at 12 months and median overall survival of 9 months. Patients with less extensive clinical presentations of anastomotic non-fixed transmural recurrence, isolated pelvic node metastasis and rectal recurrence following local excision had a local control rate of 42% at 36 months and median survival of 43 months. We conclude that clinical presentation of recurrent disease is an important prognostic factor. The value of IORT may be limited to patients with less extensive clinical presentations.

The Mayo Clinic experience with multimodality treatment of locally advanced or recurrent colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with incompletely resected locally advanced and recurrent colon cancers have a dismal prognosis. Since 1981, 100 colon cancer patients have been treated with combination therapy including surgical resection, chemotherapy, and external plus intraoperative radiotherapy.

METHODS

A prospective computerized intraoperative radiation database identified patients for this retrospective review. Data collection included patient demographics, tumor and treatment variables, and morbidity, recurrence, and survival statistics.

RESULTS

The mean age was 55.2 years. Follow-up was available for all patients. Fifty-nine patients have died. Median follow-up of survivors was 70.5 months. Twenty-five patients with locally advanced colon cancer had a median survival of 38.2 months and a 5-year survival of 49%. Eleven of these patients are still free of disease. Seventy-three patients treated for recurrent colon carcinoma had a median survival of 33.3 months from the time of recurrence, with a 5-year survival of 24.7%. Twenty-one are alive without evidence of recurrence. The 38 patients with recurrent disease whose disease was completely resected had a 37.4% 5-year survival.

CONCLUSIONS

A multimodality approach using en-bloc surgical resection with radiotherapy and chemotherapy affords some patients with locally advanced and recurrent colon cancer a chance for long-term survival.

Preoperative irradiation and surgery for recurrent rectal cancer. Will intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) be of additional benefit? A prospective study

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic gain of surgery for recurrent rectal cancer is not clear, particularly with regard to the addition of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT).

METHODS

Patients (107) with isolated pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer received preoperative external radiotherapy of 46-50 in 2 Gy fractions. At surgery 59 patients had IORT 12-18 Gy. Survival and local recurrence was analysed with regard to surgical resection stages and IORT.

RESULTS

Patients (44) had R0- and 39 R1-resections, 24 R2-resections or exploratory laparotomy. IORT was given most often after R1-resections, least in R0-patients. Estimated 5-year survival was overall around 30%, around 60% in the R0-, around 25% for R1- and 0% in R2-patients. Local recurrence was around 30% in the R0- and around 65% in R1-stage patients. R0-/R1-stage patients survived statistically significantly longer than the R2-group otherwise there was no statistical significant difference between IORT and non-IORT groups in any R-stages regarding overall survival or local recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Macroscopic removal of the recurrence improves survival. Whether R0- is better than R1-resections is not clear. The effect of IORT is not a major one. IORT need be evaluated in randomised controlled trials.

High-dose-rate intraoperative irradiation: current status and future directions

Intraoperative irradiation (IORT) refers to the delivery of a single high dose of radiation therapy at the time of surgery when the tumor bed can be precisely defined and adjacent normal tissue maximally protected. It can be effectively delivered using either electrons (IOERT) or photons produced from a high-dose-rate gamma emitting radioisotope (HDR-IORT) and has been explored primarily for locally advanced or recurrent tumors at high risk for local failure despite extensive resection and full dose external beam radiation. With coordinated multidisciplinary interaction, IORT can be integrated in a combined-modality setting without undue additional toxicity. The purpose of this review will be to summarize the growing HDR-IORT experience in the treatment of various cancers, to compare its efficacy and toxicity vis a vis the IOERT data, and to discuss future trials as well as new areas of potential application.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant radiotherapy and concurrent radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer

Radical surgery with negative margins remains the most important prognostic factor in the treatment of rectal cancer. Combined modality treatment is the recommended standard adjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer in the USA and in Germany. During the last decade substantial progress has been made in treatment modalities: surgical management currently includes a broad spectrum of operative procedures ranging from radical operations to innovative sphincter-preserving techniques. Specialized groups have reported excellent local control rates with total mesorectal excision (TME) alone. New and improved radiation techniques (conformal radiotherapy, intraoperative radiotherapy) and innovative schedules (protracted intravenous infusion, chronomodulated infusion) and combinations (oxaliplatin, irinotecan) of chemotherapy may have the potential to further increase the therapeutic benefit of adjuvant treatment. Moreover, the basic issue of timing of radio-(chemo-)therapy - preoperative versus postoperative - within a multimodality regimen is currently being addressed in prospective trials. Evidently, the current monolithic approaches, established by studies conducted more than a decade ago, to apply either the same schedule of postoperative radiochemotherapy to all patients with stage II/III rectal cancer or to give preoperative intensive short-course radiation according to the Swedish concept for all patients with resectable rectal cancer irrespective of tumor stage and treatment goal (e.g. sphincter preservation), need to be questioned. This review will discuss different irradiation settings in more recent and ongoing studies of perioperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer and will focus on the issue which patient should receive radiotherapy at all, and if so, how and when?

Comparison of intraoperative radiation therapy-containing multimodality treatment with historical treatment modalities for locally recurrent rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Treatment protocols for patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer have changed in the last two decades. Subsequently, treatment goals shifted from palliation to possible cure. In this retrospective study, we explored the treatment variables that may have contributed to the improvement in outcome by comparing three treatment modalities from two collaborating institutions in patients with similar tumor characteristics.

METHODS

Ninety-four patients were treated with electron-beam radiation therapy only (1975-1990), 19 with combined preoperative electron-beam radiation therapy and surgery (1989-1996), and 33 with intraoperative radiation therapy-multimodality treatment (1994-1999). Intraoperative radiation therapy was delivered either as intraoperative electron-beam radiotherapy (10-17.5 Gy) in 20 patients or as intraoperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy (10 Gy) in 13 patients. No patient had received prior electron-beam radiation therapy.

RESULTS

The three-year survival, disease-free survival, and local control rates were 14, 8, and 10 percent, respectively, in the electron-beam radiation therapy-only group and 11, 0, and 14 percent, respectively, in the combined electron-beam radiation therapy-surgery group. The overall intraoperative radiation therapy-multimodality treatment group showed significantly better three-year survival, disease-free survival, and local control rates of 60, 43, and 73 percent, respectively, compared with the historical control groups (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The outcome of patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer was improved after the introduction of intraoperative radiation therapy-multimodality treatment.

Treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer

PURPOSE

This study was designed to analyze the outcome for patients with isolated local recurrence after radical treatment of rectal cancer and to identify predictors of curative resection.

METHODS

The medical records of 87 patients who developed isolated local recurrence after curative radical surgery for primary rectal cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Survival rates from the time of recurrence were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Tumor stage and histology, patient characteristics, and treatment variables were analyzed using logistic regression to identify predictors of curative surgery.

RESULTS

Symptomatic treatment alone or chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy was provided to 23 patients (26 percent), and surgical exploration was performed in 64 patients. In 22 patients (25 percent), the tumor was considered unresectable at surgery (n = 13) or was resected for palliation with gross or microscopic positive margins (n = 9). In 42 patients (48 percent), curative-intent resection was performed. The only independent predictors of resectability were younger age at diagnosis, earlier stage of the primary tumor, and initial treatment by sphincter-saving procedure. There was no difference in survival between patients who had no surgery and those who had palliative surgery. The estimated five-year survival rate for patients who had curative-intent resection was better than for those who had no surgery or palliative surgery (35 vs. 7 percent; P = 0.01). Of the 42 patients who underwent curative-intent resection, 14 (33 percent) developed a second recurrence at a mean of 15 +/- 11 months after reoperation. Twenty-five percent of patients developed major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer may be helpful in a selected group of patients. The stage and treatment of the primary tumor may help to identify patients with the best chance for curative-intent resection.

A phase I/II trial of three-dimensionally planned concurrent boost radiotherapy and protracted venous infusion of 5-FU chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Improving the response to preoperative therapy may increase the likelihood of successful resection of locally advanced rectal cancers. Historically, the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate has been < approximately 10% with preoperative radiation therapy alone and < approximately 20% with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-seven patients were enrolled on a prospective Phase I/II protocol conducted jointly at Washington University, St. Louis and the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome evaluating a three-dimensionally (3D) planned boost as part of the preoperative treatment of patients with unresectable or recurrent rectal cancer. Preoperative treatment consisted of 4500 cGy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks to the pelvis, with a 3D planned 90 cGy per fraction boost delivered once or twice a week concurrently (no time delay) with the pelvic radiation. Thus, on days when the boost was treated, the tumor received a dose of 270 cGy in one fraction while the remainder of the pelvis received 180 cGy. When indicated, nonaxial beams were used for the boost. The boost treatment was twice a week (total boost dose 900 cGy) if small bowel could be excluded from the boost volume, otherwise the boost was delivered once a week (total boost dose 450 cGy). Patients also received continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (1500 mg/m(2)-week) concurrently with the radiation as well as postoperative 5-FU/leucovorin.

RESULTS

All 37 patients completed preoperative radiotherapy as planned within 32--39 elapsed days. Twenty-seven underwent proctectomy; reasons for unresectability included persistent locally advanced disease (6 cases) and progressive distant metastatic disease with stable or smaller local disease (4 cases). Actuarial 3-year survival was 82% for the group as a whole. Among resected cases the 3-year local control and freedom from disease relapse were 86% and 69%, respectively.Twenty-four of the lesions (65%) achieved an objective clinical response by size criteria, including 9 (24%) with pCR at the primary site (documented T0 at surgery). The most important factor for pCR was tumor volume: small lesions with planning target volume (PTV) < 200 cc showed a 50% pCR rate (p = 0.02). There were no treatment associated fatalities. Nine of the 37 patients (24%) experienced Grade 3 or 4 toxicities (usually proctitis) during preoperative treatment. There were an additional 7 perioperative and 2 late toxicities. The most important factors for small bowel toxicity (acute or late) were small bowel volume (> or = 150 cc at doses exceeding 4000 cGy) and large tumor (PTV > or = 800 cc). For rectal toxicity the threshold is PTV > or = 500 cc.

CONCLUSION

3D planned boost therapy is feasible. In addition to permitting the use of nonaxial beams for improved dose distributions, 3D planning provides tumor and normal tissue dose-volume information that is important in interpreting outcome. Every effort should be made to limit the treated small bowel to less than 150 cc. Tumor size is the most important predictor of response, with small lesions of PTV < 200 cc most likely to develop complete responses.

Urologic and sexual morbidity following multimodality treatment for locally advanced primary and locally recurrent rectal cancer

AIMS

In the treatment of patients with locally advanced primary or locally recurrent rectal cancer much attention is given to the oncological aspects. In long-term survivors, urogenital morbidity can have a large effect on the quality of life. This study evaluates the functional outcome after multimodality treatment in these patient groups.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1994 and August 1999, 55 patients with locally advanced primary and 66 patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer were treated with multimodality treatment: i.e. high-dose preoperative external beam radiation therapy, followed by extended surgery and intraoperative radiotherapy. The medical records of the 121 patients were reviewed. To assess long-term urogenital morbidity, all patients still alive, with a minimum follow-up of 4 months, were asked to fill out a questionnaire about their voiding and sexual function. Seventy-six of the 79 currently living patients (96%) returned the questionnaire (median FU 14 months, range 4-60).

RESULTS

The questionnaire revealed identifiable voiding dysfunction as a new problem in 31% of the male and 58% of the female patients. In 42% of patients after locally advanced primary and 48% after locally recurrent rectal cancer treatment bladder dysfunction occurred. The preoperative ability to have an orgasm had disappeared in 50% of the male and 50% of the female patients, and in 45% of patients after locally advanced primary and in 57% after locally recurrent rectal cancer treatment.

CONCLUSION

Multimodality treatment for locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer results in acceptable urogenital dysfunction if weighed by the risk of uncontrolled tumour progression. Long-term voiding and sexual function is decreased in half of the patients. Preoperative counselling of these patients on treatment-related urogenital morbidity is important.

Abdominosacral resection for primary irresectable and locally recurrent rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to present a technique of abdominosacral resection and its results in patients with locally advanced primary or locally recurrent rectal cancer with dorsolateral fixation.

METHODS

Between 1994 and 1999, 13 patients with locally advanced primary rectal cancer and 37 patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer underwent abdominosacral resection as part of a multimodality treatment, i.e., preoperative irradiation, surgery, and intraoperative irradiation. After the abdominal phase, the patient was turned from supine to prone position to perform the transsacral phase of the resection.

RESULTS

Margins were microscopically negative in 26 patients (52 percent), microscopically positive in 18 (36 percent), and positive with gross residual disease in 6 patients. Operation time ranged from 210 to 590 (median, 390) minutes, and blood loss ranged from 400 to 10,000 (median, 3,500) ml. No operative or hospital deaths occurred. Postoperative complications occurred in 41 patients (82 percent); most notable were perineal wound infections or dehiscence (n = 24, 48 percent). Other complications were postoperative urinary retention or incontinence (n = 9, 18 percent), peritonitis (n = 4), grade II neuropathy (n = 1), and fistula formation (n = 3). Kaplan-Meier 3-year overall survival, disease-free survival, and local control rates were, respectively, 41 percent, 31 percent, and 61 percent. Completeness of the resection (negative vs. positive margins) was a significant factor influencing survival (P = 0.04), disease-free survival (P = 0.0006), and local control (P = 0.0002).

CONCLUSION

The abdominosacral resection provides wide access and may be the therapeutic solution for the accomplishment of a radical resection for distally situated, dorsally or dorsolaterally fixed primary or locally recurrent rectal cancers.

Intraoperative irradiation for locally recurrent colorectal cancer in previously irradiated patients

PURPOSE

Information in the literature regarding salvage treatment for patients with locally recurrent colorectal cancer who have previously been treated with high or moderate dose external beam irradiation (EBRT) is scarce. A retrospective review was therefore performed in our institution to determine disease control, survival, and tolerance in patients treated aggressively with surgical resection and intraoperative electron irradiation (IOERT) +/- additional EBRT and chemotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1981 through 1994, 51 previously irradiated patients with recurrent locally advanced colorectal cancer without evidence of distant metastatic disease were treated at Mayo Clinic Rochester with surgical resection and IOERT +/- additional EBRT. An attempt was made to achieve a gross total resection before IOERT if it could be safely accomplished. The median IOERT dose was 20 Gy (range, 10--30 Gy). Thirty-seven patients received additional EBRT either pre- or postoperatively with doses ranging from 5 to 50.4 Gy (median 25.2 Gy). Twenty patients received 5-fluorouracil +/- leucovorin during EBRT. Three patients received additional cycles of 5-fluorouracil +/- leucovorin as maintenance chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Thirty males and 21 females with a median age of 55 years (range 31--73 years) were treated. Thirty-four patients have died; the median follow-up in surviving patients is 21 months. The median, 2-yr, and 5-yr actuarial overall survivals are 23 months, 48% and 12%, respectively. The 2-yr actuarial central control (within IOERT field) is 72%. Local control at 2 years has been maintained in 60% of patients. There is a trend toward improved local control in patients who received > or =30 Gy EBRT in addition to IOERT as compared to those who received no EBRT or <30 Gy with 2-yr local control rates of 81% vs. 54%. Distant metastatic disease has developed in 25 patients, and the actuarial rate of distant progression at 2 and 4 years is 56% and 76%, respectively. Peripheral neuropathy was the main IOERT-related toxicity; 16 (32%) patients developed neuropathies (7 mild, 5 moderate, 4 severe). Ureteral narrowing or obstruction occurred in seven patients. All but one patient with neuropathy or ureter fibrosis received IOERT doses > or =20 Gy.

CONCLUSION

Long-term local control can be obtained in a substantial proportion of patients with aggressive combined modality therapy, but long-term survival is poor due to the high rate of distant metastasis. Re-irradiation with EBRT in addition to IOERT appears to improve local control. Strategies to improve survival in these poor-risk patients may include the more routine use of conventional systemic chemotherapy or the addition of novel systemic therapies.

Intraoperative radiotherapy for gastrointestinal cancer

Local recurrence following potentially curative tumor resection is a major problem in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. To augment surgical excision and to avoid the disadvantages of external beam irradiation, intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has been applied to primary and recurrent gastrointestinal cancer, both with curative intent and for palliation. There is ample evidence that the combination of radical surgery and IORT can improve local control. Whether this eventually can translate into improved overall survival has not yet been studied in adequately powered randomized and controlled trials.

Perioperative radiotherapy and concurrent radiochemotherapy in rectal cancer

Combined modality treatment is the recommended standard adjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer in the United States and Germany. During the last decade substantial progress has been made in treatment modalities, and surgical management currently includes a broad spectrum of operative procedures ranging from radical operations to innovative sphincter-preserving techniques. Specialized groups have reported excellent local control rates with total mesorectal excision (TME) alone. New and improved radiation techniques (conformal and intraoperative radiotherapy) and innovative schedules (protracted intravenous and chronomodulated infusion) and combinations (oxaliplatin and irinotecan) of chemotherapy may have the potential to further increase the therapeutic benefit of adjuvant treatment. Moreover, the basic issue of timing (pre- or postoperative) within a multimodal regimen is currently being addressed in prospective trials. Evidently there is a need to question the current monolithic approaches, which were established by studies conducted more than a decade ago. It is also under discussion whether to apply the same schedule of postoperative radiochemotherapy to all patients with stage II/III rectal cancer, or to give preoperative intensive short-course radiation according to the Swedish concept for all patients with resectable rectal cancer irrespective of tumor stage and treatment goal (e.g., sphincter preservation). This review discusses different irradiation settings in more recent and ongoing studies of perioperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer, and focuses on the issue of which patient should receive radiotherapy (if at all), and if so, how and when.

High-dose-rate intraoperative brachytherapy for recurrent colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Management of locally recurrent colorectal adenocarcinoma represents a significant challenge. Many of these tumors adhere to or invade into vital pelvic structures rendering surgery or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) as palliative treatment. Therefore, a treatment approach was developed to evaluate the role of high-dose-rate intraoperative brachytherapy (HDR-IORT) and surgery as a component of therapy in the management of locally recurrent colorectal cancer. This is an update of our preliminary report with longer follow-up and larger patient numbers.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 1992 and September 1998, 74 patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer were treated with surgery and HDR-IORT. Additional EBRT was given to 29 patients, and 33 patients received 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy. All patients underwent complete gross resection, and 21 of 74 had positive microscopic margin. The dose of HDR-IORT ranged from 10 to 18 Gy.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 22 months, the 5-year local control, distant metastasis disease-free, disease-free, and overall survival rates were 39%, 39%, 23%, and 23%, respectively. The only predictor of improved local control was a negative margin of resection with a 5-year local control rate of 43%, compared to 26% in those with positive margin (p = 0.02). For overall survival, a negative microscopic margin (p = 0.04) and the use of IORT + EBRT (p = 0.04) were significant predictors of improved survival. The incidence of peripheral neuropathy was 16%.

CONCLUSION

The results with HDR-IORT in this group of patients are encouraging. Further improvements in local and distant control are still needed.

Intra-operative irradiation (IORT) for primary advanced and recurrent rectal cancer. a need for randomised studies

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of intra-operative irradiation (IORT) combined with pre-operative external beam irradiation (EBRT) and surgical resection in patients with locally advanced primary or recurrent rectal cancer. 64 patients with locally advanced primary cancer and 104 with recurrence had EBRT (46-50 Gy) before surgery. 80 patients received IORT (median dose 15 Gy energy 12 MeV). 80 patients had R0 resections, 47 R1 and 41 R2 resections. More R1 resections were performed in the IORT group, more R0 and R2 resections in the non-IORT group. Median follow-up was around 22 months. 146 patients were resected, 22 had exploratory laparotomy. The cumulative overall survival was similar for both the IORT and non-IORT groups. 5-year survival for primary cancers was 48% versus 28% for recurrences. No R2 resections survived 3.5 years. 5-year-survival for R0 resections was nearly 60% and around 30% for R1 resections. The survival curves of the patients given and not given IORT treatment was not statistically different when R0, R1 and R2 resections were analysed separately. IORT did not seem to influence the local recurrence rate when R0 and R1 resections were analysed separately or in a multivariate analysis. The IORT and non-IORT groups were not identical with regard to type of cancer and R-stage. Still the lack of an identifiable impact of IORT suggests that there is a need for randomised studies of the IORT effect.

Results and complications of surgery combined with intra-operative radiation therapy for the treatment of locally advanced or recurrent cancers in the pelvis

Intra-operative radiation therapy (IORT) can benefit patients with pelvic tumors by delivering a high dose of radiation with precise delineation of tumor bed and maximal protection of surrounding normal tissues. The IORT experience has been particularly promising for locally advanced primary or recurrent rectal cancers in which a gross total resection is achieved. However, its potential benefit must be weighed against added toxicity. The main dose-limiting toxicity of pelvic IORT is peripheral neuropathy and ureteral stenosis. We will review the techniques for optimal IORT delivery, the results of the major studies investigating IORT treatment of rectal cancer, and the pelvic complications associated with combining surgery and IORT. A team of surgeons and radiation oncologists providing close multidisciplinary coordination is essential to integrate IORT with combined modality regimens in a safe and effective manner.

Total pelvic exenteration for locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Since its first description in 1948, total pelvic exenteration has been a surgical option for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer in selected patients. During these 50 years, it has remained a formidable procedure with high mortality and substantial morbidity. This report describes the results of total pelvic exenteration for rectal cancer in terms of post-operative mortality, morbidity, and longterm survival in patients with locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

A study of the patient records revealed that 24 patients underwent total pelvic exenteration as the treatment for locally advanced primary or recurrent cancer of the rectum from 1983 to 1998. The charts of the patients were reviewed, and morbidity and mortality were documented. The survival of the patients was also analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients had primary tumor and 9 had locally recurrent cancer. The mean age was 62 years old. There were no postoperative deaths, and the complication rate was 54%. In the treatment of primary tumor, bowel continuity was possible in 60% of the patients. Previous radiation or operation for recurrent disease was not associated with increased morbidity. The overall 5-year survival was 44%. The 5-year survival of patients with primary cancer was 64% and was significantly better than the rate for those with recurrent disease. Only one patient with recurrent disease survived more than 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Total pelvic exenteration now can be performed with low mortality rates, but the morbidity remains high. In the treatment of primary rectal cancer, good survival (64%) can be achieved, but results are dismal for the treatment of recurrent disease. We suggest better selection of patients for this procedure, especially as a treatment for recurrent rectal cancer.

Intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy for locally recurrent rectal carcinoma

PURPOSE

Treatment results for locally recurrent rectal cancers are poor. This is a result of the fact that surgery is hampered due to the severance of the anatomical planes during the primary procedure and that radiotherapy is limited by normal tissue tolerance, especially after previous irradiation. This paper describes the results of a combined treatment modality in this patient group.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1994 to 1998, 37 patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer, but without distant metastatic disease, received a combined treatment consisting of 50.4 Gy preoperative irradiation or, in case of previous radiotherapy, 30 Gy reirradiation or no irradiation, followed by radical surgery and intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy boost.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients received a radical resection (R0), eight a microscopic irradical resection (R1), and 14 a macroscopic irradical resection (R2). The overall 3-year local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival rates were 60%, 32%, and 58% respectively. Radicality of resection (R0/R1 vs. R2) turned out to be the significant factor for improved survival (p < 0.05), DFS (p = 0.0008), and LC (p = 0.01). Preoperative (re-)irradiation is the other significant factor in survival (p = 0.005) and DFS (p = 0.001) and was almost significant for LC (p = 0.08). After external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) a significantly higher resection rate was obtained (R0/R1 vs. R2 p = 0.001). Symptomatic peripheral local recurrences have a significantly worse prognosis and higher rate of R2-resection (p = 0.0005).

CONCLUSION

Centralization of locally recurrent rectal cancer patients enabled the development of an aggressive multimodality treatment, which in turn led to promising results. Distant failure is still a drawback.

Intraoperative irradiation after surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer

PURPOSE

This study retrospectively evaluated the effects of intraoperative electron beam irradiation on patients with locally recurrent (pelvic) rectal cancer.

METHODS

From November 1, 1975, to December 31, 1997, 51 patients underwent surgery for locally recurrent rectal or rectosigmoid cancer, and 27 patients received intraoperative electron beam irradiation. The intraoperative electron beam irradiation dose was 15 to 30 Gy. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates at three and five years were analyzed for the 47 patients who recovered postoperatively.

RESULTS

Statistically significant factors related to survival included intraoperative electron beam irradiation vs. no intraoperative electron beam irradiation (P=0.0007), amount of residual tumor (slight vs. gross; P=0.0022), and symptom status (P=0.0024). Factors not associated with survival included distant metastases at reoperation, type of surgery for the recurrent tumor, external beam irradiation, pathologic grade, age, and gender. Surgical resection without intraoperative electron beam irradiation resulted in three-year and five-year survival rates of 5 and 0 percent, respectively. For patients who received intraoperative electron beam irradiation, the three-year survival rate was 43 percent and five-year survival rate was 21 percent. Intraoperative electron beam irradiation was a statistically significant factor related to survival in patients with and without distant metastasis (P=0.04 and P=0.0035, respectively), with slight residual tumor (P=0.0003), or with palliative surgery (P=0.0276).

CONCLUSION

The trends seen in resection with intraoperative electron beam irradiation are encouraging with regard to improvements in survival as compared with studies not using intraoperative electron beam irradiation treatment.

Brachytherapy in the treatment of colorectal malignancies

By precisely delivering a single, high dose fraction of intraoperative radiation under direct visualization while excluding surrounding normal dose-limiting tissues, IORT has improved the therapeutic ratio of tumor control to morbidity. Both IOERT and HDR-IORT represent effective means of delivering this therapy, and either may be chosen with equal confidence, depending upon the facilities available, physician preference, and the clinical situation. The extraordinary efforts often required in the management of these highly selected patients is justified by the improvement achieved in the enhanced local control rates and increased cure rates. Preoperative chemoradiation therapy followed by gross total resection and IORT affords the patient the highest likelihood of local control and survival. The importance of aggressive surgery in achieving gross total resection with pathologically negative margins is reflected by the dramatic correlation reported between margin status and local control. The high complication rate associated with this multidisciplinary therapy is, no doubt, multifactorial and may be attributed to the advanced disease state at presentation and the intensive multidisciplinary treatments administered. In an effort to eradicate disease and prolong survival, many consider these elevated complication rates acceptable, particularly in light of the complexity of these cases, as well as the morbidity and mortality associated with persistent disease in the pelvis.

Indications for and results of combined modality treatment of colorectal cancer

Combined modality chemoirradiation is commonly used as a component of treatment in combination with maximum resection for both high-risk resectable and locally advanced primary or recurrent rectal cancers. With surgically resected but high-risk rectal cancers, postoperative chemoirradiation has been shown to improve both disease control (local and distant) and survival (disease-free and overall) and was recommended as standard adjuvant treatment at the 1990 National Institute of Health (NIH) Consensus Conference on Adjuvant treatment for patients with rectal and colon cancers. Subsequent intergroup trials are being conducted to help define optimal combinations of postoperative chemoirradiation for resected high-risk rectal cancers and to test sequencing issues of preoperative versus postoperative chemoirradiation. With locally unresectable primary or recurrent colorectal cancers, standard therapy with surgery, external beam irradiation (EBRT) and chemotherapy is often unsuccessful. When intraoperative electron irradiation (IOERT) is combined with standard treatment, local control and survival appear to be improved in separate analyses from the Mayo Clinic and the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). However, routine use of systemic therapy is also needed as a component of treatment, in view of high rates of systemic failure.

Primary myocutaneous flap closure following resection of locally advanced pelvic malignancies

BACKGROUND

Perineal wounds, created at the time of extended resection for locally advanced malignancy and following chemoradiation, are at risk of serious complications.

METHODS

To determine whether immediate myocutaneous flap closure prevents complications, 57 patients treated with multimodality therapy and proctectomy (35 perineal wounds) or sacrectomy (22 posterior wounds) were studied. Patients were categorized according to whether they underwent primary skin and pelvic closure (group 1; ,n = 20); primary skin and omental pelvic closure (group 2; n = 24); or immediate myocutaneous flap closure (group 3; n = 13).

RESULTS

Groups were similar with respect to age and sex; however, group 1 had more primary tumours and required less radical surgery and chemoirradiation than groups 2 and 3. Groups 1 and 2 experienced more complications overall (eight of 20, nine of 24 and three of 13 patients in groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively), more acute wound complications (seven of 20, nine of 24 and two of 13), delayed wound healing (three of 20, six of 24 and one of 13) and more reoperations for perineal wound problems (five of 20, seven of 24 and zero of 13). Patients in group 2 had a significantly longer hospital stay than those in group 1. Flap closure (group 3) did not increase the length of stay. The routine use of primary flap closure reduced overall wound complications (eight of 31 versus ten of 26 patients) and length of hospitalization (13 versus 17 days).

CONCLUSION

Complete wound healing was achieved in all patients; however, immediate myocutaneous flap closure reduced the need for readmission and reoperation.

Multidisciplinary management of recurrent colorectal cancer

Isolated pelvic recurrence of rectal carcinoma may occur in up to one third of patients following definitive resection of primary disease. The means by which recurrence is diagnosed, methods by which it may be treated, and reported outcomes are all evolving and improving. Current data indicate that a substantial proportion of patients treated by aggressive multi-modality salvage therapy may be provided with durable survival. This review highlights current concepts in the diagnosis and management of locally recurrent rectal carcinoma.

Moderate dose intraoperative and external beam radiotherapy for locally recurrent rectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Late adverse effects (i.e. neuropathy, chronic bowel obstruction) limit the effective dose given in intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Initial results of a multi-modality treatment approach using moderate dose IORT and moderate dose EBRT are presented.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-one consecutive patients with recurrent rectal carcinomas had IORT and EBRT after complete (R0, n = 14) or incomplete resection (R1, n = 9; R2, n = 8). The mean [ORT dose was 13.7 Gy (range 12-20 Gy) supplemented with an EBRT dose of 41.4 Gy. Twenty-two patients had preoperative EBRT and 22 patients had concomitant chemotherapy (5-FU, Leucovorine).

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 28 months, 16 patients had re-recurrent disease and 11 patients had died. Nine patients failed locally (four in-field, four marginal and one anastomotic re-recurrence), three combined with distant metastasis, resulting in overall and IORT infield local control rates of 71% and 87%, respectively. Distant metastases alone were found in seven patients. The 4-year overall and relapse-free survival rates were 58% and 48%, respectively. After incomplete resection the local failure rate increased (R0 21%, R1/2 35%) and the 4-year relapse-free survival rate decreased significantly (29% versus 71%) due to a markedly increased distant metastasis rate (53% versus 7%). Acute and late toxicities were not increased.

CONCLUSION

The combination of moderate dose IORT and EBRT is a safe and efficacious component in a multi-modality treatment approach.

High dose rate intraoperative radiation therapy (HDR-IORT) as part of the management strategy for locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Primary unresectable and locally advanced recurrent rectal cancer presents a significant clinical challenge. Local failure rates are high in both situations. Under such circumstances, there is a significant need to safely deliver tumoricidal doses of radiation in an attempt to improve local control. For this reason, we have incorporated a new approach utilizing high dose rate intraoperative radiation therapy (HDR-IORT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 11/92-12/96, a total of 112 patients were explored, of which 68 patients were treated with HDR-IORT, and 66 are evaluable. The majority of the 44 patients were excluded for unresectable disease or for distant metastases which eluded preoperative imaging. There were 22 patients with primary unresectable disease, and 46 patients who presented with recurrent disease. The histology was adenocarcinoma in 64 patients, and squamous cell carcinoma in four patients. In general, the patients with primary unresectable disease received preoperative chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin, and external beam irradiation to 4500-5040 cGy, followed by surgical resection and HDR-IORT (1000-2000 cGy). In general, the patients with recurrent disease were treated with surgical resection and HDR-IORT (1000-2000 cGy) alone. All surgical procedures were done in a dedicated operating room in the brachytherapy suite, so that HDR-IORT could be delivered using the Harrison-Anderson-Mick (HAM) applicator. The median follow-up is 17.5 months (1-48 mo).

RESULTS

In primary cases, the actuarial 2-year local control is 81%. For patients with negative margins, the local control was 92% vs. 38% for those with positive margins (p = 0.002). The 2-year actuarial disease-free survival was 69%; 77% for patients with negative margins vs. 38% for patients with positive margins (p = 0.03). For patients with recurrent disease, the 2-year actuarial local control rate was 63%. For patients with negative margins, it was 82%, while it was 19% for those with positive margins (p = 0.02). The disease-free survival was 47% (71% for negative margins and 0% for positive margins) (p = 0.04). Prospective data gathering indicated that significant complications occurred in approximately 38% of patients and were multifactorial in nature, and manageable to complete recovery.

CONCLUSION

HDR-IORT using our technique is versatile, safe, and effective. The local control rates for primary disease compare quite well with other published series, especially for patients with negative margins. For patients with recurrent disease, locoregional control and survival are especially encouraging in patients with negative resection margins. Further follow-up is needed to see whether these encouraging data will continue.

Treatment systems guidelines for primary rectal cancer from the 1996 Patterns of Care Study

PURPOSE

The Patterns of Care Rectal Cancer Committee was formed to develop consensus recommendations for patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum limited to the pelvis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The Committee was composed of a multidisciplinary group of oncologists, and clinical scenarios were chosen to address most of the major treatment controversies in the combined modality treatment of rectal cancer. A literature search was then conducted and the major articles were identified. A modified Delphi technique was used to arrive at consensus. Serial surveys were conducted by distributing questionnaires to the Committee members to consolidate expert opinion. Voting was conducted using a scoring system and opinions were unified to the highest degree possible.

RESULTS

Consensus voting was performed for 4 clinical scenarios. Acceptability ratings for treatment were grouped into 3 broad categories: not acceptable, acceptable, and most acceptable. Based on the treatment options, a decision tree was developed that reflects the consensus of the committee.

CONCLUSION

These options may help guide treatment decisions in rectal cancer.