GRAND: the German retrospective cohort analysis on compliance and persistence and the associated risk of fractures in osteoporotic women treated with oral bisphosphonates

Association between gastrointestinal events and compliance with osteoporosis therapy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to estimate the rate of gastrointestinal (GI) events, and association between GI events and compliance with osteoporosis therapy among osteoporotic women.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using a large administrative claims database in the United States from 2001 through 2010 was conducted. We studied women ≥ 55 years old who were continuously enrolled in a health plan for at least 2 years, a baseline year before and a follow-up year after the date of the first prescription of oral bisphosphonate as the first oral osteoporosis treatment. Compliance with osteoporosis therapy was measured using the medication possession ratio (MPR), with compliance defined as MPR ≥ 0.8. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the association between occurrence of GI events and compliance with osteoporosis therapy after controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

A sample consisting of 75,593 women taking at least one oral bisphosphonate with mean (SD) age of 64 (8) years was identified. A total of 21,142 (28%) patients experienced at least one GI event during the follow-up period. Only 31,306 (41%) patients were compliant with osteoporosis therapy. Patients who experienced GI events after initiation of oral bisphosphonates were 29% less likely to adhere to osteoporosis therapy as compared to patients who did not experience GI events (odds ratio [95% CI], 0.71 [0.69-0.74]; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Less than half of the patients were compliant with osteoporosis therapy within one year after initiating oral bisphosphonates, and the likelihood of compliance was significantly lower by 29% among women with GI events.

Persistence with denosumab and persistence with oral bisphosphonates for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a retrospective, observational study, and a meta-analysis

The objectives of this study were to estimate persistence with denosumab and put these results in context by conducting a review of persistence with oral bisphosphonates. Persistence with denosumab was found to be higher than with oral bisphosphonates.

PURPOSE

This study had two objectives: to analyse persistence in Swedish women initiating denosumab for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) and to put these findings in context by conducting a literature review and meta-analysis of persistence data for oral bisphosphonates.

METHODS

The study used the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register and included women aged at least 50 years initiating denosumab between May 2010 and July 2012. One injection of denosumab was defined as 6-month persistence. Women were considered persistent for another 6 months if they filled their next prescription within 6 months + 56 days and survival analysis applied to the data. A literature search was conducted in PubMed to identify retrospective studies of persistence with oral bisphosphonates and pooled persistence estimates were calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

The study identified 2,315 women who were incident denosumab users. Mean age was 74 years and 61% had been previously treated for PMO. At 12 and 24 months, persistence with denosumab was 83% (95% CI, 81-84%) and 62% (95% CI, 60-65%), respectively. The literature search identified 40 articles for inclusion in the meta-analysis. At 12 and 24 months, persistence with oral bisphosphonates ranged from 10% to 78% and from 16% to 46%, with pooled estimates of 45% and 30%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

These data from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register and literature review suggest that persistence was higher with denosumab than with oral bisphosphonates.

Persistence, adherence, and medication-taking behavior in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis receiving denosumab in routine practice in Germany, Austria, Greece, and Belgium: 12-month results from a European non-interventional study

Persistence with and adherence to osteoporosis therapy are critical for fracture reduction. This non-interventional study is evaluating medication-taking behavior of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) receiving denosumab in Germany, Austria, Greece, and Belgium. Patients were representative of the PMO population and highly persistent with and adherent to denosumab at 12 months.

INTRODUCTION

Persistence with and adherence to osteoporosis therapy are important for optimal treatment efficacy, namely fracture reduction. This ongoing, non-interventional study will evaluate medication-taking behavior of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) receiving denosumab in routine practice in four European countries.

METHODS

The study enrolled women who had been prescribed subcutaneous denosumab (60 mg every 6 months) in accordance with prescribing information and local guidelines. Persistence was defined as receiving the subsequent injection within 6 months + 8 weeks of the previous injection. Adherence was defined as receiving two consecutive injections within 6 months ± 4 weeks of each other. Medication coverage ratio (MCR) was calculated using the time a patient was covered with denosumab, as assessed from prescription records. Treatment was assigned prior to and independently of enrollment; outcomes are recorded during routine practice.

RESULTS

These planned 12-month interim analyses included data from 1500 patients from 141 sites. Mean age was 66.4-72.4 years, mean baseline total hip T-scores ranged from -2.0 to -2.1 and femoral neck T-scores from -2.2 to -2.6, and 30.7-62.1% of patients had prior osteoporotic fracture. Persistence was 87.0-95.3%, adherence 82.7-89.3%, and MCR 91.3-95.4%. In a univariate analysis, increased age, decreased mobility, and increased distance to the clinic were associated with significantly decreased persistence; parental history of hip fracture was associated with significantly increased persistence.

CONCLUSIONS

These data extend the real-world evidence regarding persistence with and adherence to denosumab, both of which are critical for favorable clinical outcomes, including fracture risk reduction.

[PERSIRIS study: observational study, postmarketing, prospective, to evaluate the persistence to treatment with monthly risedronate in women with osteoporosis]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the persistence of treatment with monthly risedronate and know the reasons of persistence and nontherapeutic persistence and the profile of the non-persistent patients.

DESING

Observational, postmarketin and prospective study.

LOCATION

Primary care, traumatology, rheumatology, gynecology and geriatrics of Catalonia.

PARTICIPANTS

Women with osteoporosis treated with monthly risedronate that previously had abandoned weekly bisphosphonate therapy.

MAIN MEASUREMENTS

Percentage of patients on persistent monthly risedronate year of their prescription, reasons for persistent and non persistent and profile of non persistent patients in relation to biodemographic data, clinical data and risk factors for fracture.

RESULTS

289 evaluable patients with a mean age of 68.3. At 12 months of initiation with monthly risedronate, 58.1% of patients remained on treatment. Most frequent reasons for leaving: fear of having side effects and belief that the disease is typical of the age. Reasons remarkable persistence: comfort/ease and dosage. Significant differences were observed between persistent and non-persistent patients relative to: employment status, number of concomitant therapy and height; however the results of possible associated factors must be contextualized within the study characteristics and the difference in size does not seem clinically relevant.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of therapeutic patterns more comfortable as monthly risedronate in osteoporosis, could facilitate persistence in patients improving the effectiveness of the drug. However in that persistence can also influence biodemographic and clinical variables and diverse of various kinds.

Analysis of osteoporosis treatment patterns with bisphosphonates and outcomes among postmenopausal veterans

PURPOSE

Adherence and persistence with bisphosphonates are frequently poor, and stopping, restarting, or switching bisphosphonates is common. We evaluated bisphosphonate change behaviors (switching, discontinuing, or reinitiating) over time, as well as fractures and costs, among a large, national cohort of postmenopausal veterans.

METHODS

Female veterans aged 50+ treated with bisphosphonates during 2003-2011 were identified in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) datasets. Bisphosphonate change behaviors were characterized using pharmacy refill records. Patients' baseline disease severity was characterized based on age, T-score, and prior fracture. Cox Proportional Hazard analysis was used to evaluate characteristics associated with discontinuation and the relationship between change behaviors and fracture outcomes. Generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate the relationship between change behaviors and cost outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 35,650 patients met eligibility criteria. Over 6800 patients (19.1%) were non-switchers. The remaining patients were in the change cohort; at least half displayed more than one change behavior over time. A strong, significant predictor of discontinuation was ≥5 healthcare visits in the prior year (11-23% more likely to discontinue), and discontinuation risk decreased with increasing age. No change behaviors were associated with increased fracture risk. Total costs were significantly higher in patients with change behaviors (4.7-19.7% higher). Change-behavior patients mostly had significantly lower osteoporosis-related costs than non-switchers (22%-118% lower).

CONCLUSIONS

Most bisphosphonate patients discontinue treatment at some point, which did not significantly increase the risk of fracture in this majority non-high risk population. Bisphosphonate change behaviors were associated with significantly lower osteoporosis costs, but significantly higher total costs.

Use of a German longitudinal prescription database (LRx) in pharmacoepidemiology

Large epidemiological databases are often used to examine matters pertaining to drug utilization, health services, and drug safety. The major strength of such databases is that they include large sample sizes, which allow precise estimates to be made. The IMS^® LRx database has in recent years been used as a data source for epidemiological research. The aim of this paper is to review a number of recent studies published with the aid of this database and compare these with the results of similar studies using independent data published in the literature. In spite of being somewhat limited to studies for which comparative independent results were available, it was possible to include a wide range of possible uses of the LRx database in a variety of therapeutic fields: prevalence/incidence rate determination (diabetes, epilepsy), persistence analyses (diabetes, osteoporosis), use of comedication (diabetes), drug utilization (G-CSF market) and treatment costs (diabetes, G-CSF market). In general, the results of the LRx studies were found to be clearly in line with previously published reports. In some cases, noticeable discrepancies between the LRx results and the literature data were found (e.g. prevalence in epilepsy, persistence in osteoporosis) and these were discussed and possible reasons presented. Overall, it was concluded that the IMS^® LRx database forms a suitable database for pharmacoepidemiological studies.

Discontinuation rates of menopausal hormone therapy among postmenopausal women in the post-WHI study era

OBJECTIVES

Many women are reluctant to take menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) and discontinue the treatment within 12 months. The aim of this study was to investigate the persistence rates of combined MHT in the last decade, reflecting changes in the post-Women's Health Initiative era.

METHODS

We analyzed 17 020 patients receiving combined MHT from 2004 to 2013 using the Disease Analyzer database.

RESULTS

After 12 months of follow-up, 44.6% and 33.5% of patients receiving 1 mg and 2 mg, respectively, of oral combined MHT were still on treatment (p < 0.0001). The persistence rate of patients receiving < 50 μg of transdermal MHT was 39.1% after 1 year of treatment and presented no differences compared to patients receiving ≥ 50 μg of transdermal MHT with a persistence rate of 38.2%. MHT start in the years 2007-2009 was associated with higher discontinuation rates (hazard ratio 1.04, p = 0.0709) than MHT start in the years 2010-2013 (hazard ratio 0.90, p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that patients beginning their treatments in the years 2010-2013 were more treatment-persistent than patients beginning with MHT in the early years after publication of the Women's Health Initiative study (2004-2009). Administration of low-dose oral MHT and transdermal MHT is associated with increased persistency compared to higher doses of oral MHT.

Long-term persistence with anti-osteoporosis drugs after fracture

Long-term persistence with anti-osteoporosis drugs and determinants for discontinuation among fracture patients were examined. Persistence was 75.0 and 45.3 % after 1 and 5 years, respectively. Those aged ≥80 years were at increased risk of early discontinuation. Within 1 year after discontinuation, 24.3 % restarted therapy, yet 47.0 % persisted for 1 year.

INTRODUCTION

The risk of osteoporotic fracture can effectively be reduced with use of anti-osteoporosis drugs. However, little is known about persistence with these drugs after fracture where subsequent fracture risk is high. The aims were to determine long-term persistence with anti-osteoporosis drugs among fracture patients, including its determinants, and to describe restart and subsequent persistence.

METHODS

A cohort study was conducted within the Dutch PHARMO Database Network. Patients aged ≥50 years (n = 961) who received anti-osteoporosis drugs within 1 year after fracture, but not in the preceding year, were included (2002-2011). Persistence (defined as the proportion on treatment) and the proportion restarting after discontinuation were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Time-dependent Cox regression was used to identify determinants of non-persistence including age, sex, initial dosage regime, fracture type, comorbidities, and drug use.

RESULTS

Persistence with anti-osteoporosis drugs was 75.0 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 72.0-77.7) and 45.3 % (95 % CI 40.4-50.0) after 1 and 5 years, respectively. A significant determinant of non-persistence was age ≥80 years (reference 50-59 years: adjusted hazard ratio [adj. HR] 1.65; 95 % CI 1.15-2.38). This effect was not constant over time (≤360 days following initiation: adj. HR 2.07; 95 % CI 1.27-3.37; >360 days: adj. HR 1.08; 95 % CI 0.62-1.88). Within 1 year after discontinuation, 24.3 % (95 % CI 20.1-29.2) restarted therapy, yet 47.0 % persisted for 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified suboptimal persistence with anti-osteoporosis drugs among fracture patients. Major target groups for measures aimed to improve persistence may be those aged >80 years and those restarting therapy.

Discontinuation of treatment using anticholinergic medications in patients with urinary incontinence

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the discontinuation rates of anticholinergics prescribed in patients with urinary incontinence (UI).

METHODS

Data from a Disease Analyzer database including 988 general, 95 urologist, and 203 gynecologic practices were examined. Twenty six thousand eight hundred thirty-four patients were identified as having received a first-time anticholinergic prescription for UI, namely darifenacin, fesoterodine, oxybutynin, propiverine, solifenacin, tolterodine, or trospium, between 2005 and 2012. Covariates studied included demographic data, concomitant diagnoses, and potential drug-induced side effects. The cumulative discontinuation rate of initial treatment was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier analysis. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to estimate the relationship between discontinuation and the demographic and clinical variables for up to 36 months.

RESULTS

An increasing discontinuation rate was observed in years 1, 2, and 3 (74.8%, 77.6%, 87%). Within 3 years, discontinuation rates were higher for men than for women (87.9%, 86.5%; P=.056; hazard ratio [HR] 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-1.18; P<.001), for patients treated in gynecologic practices and general practices than those treated in urologist practices (HR 1.60; 95% CI 1.52-1.67, P<.001 and HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.20-1.29, P<.001, respectively) and for younger patients than those older than 80 year old (60 years or younger, HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.22-1.33; 61-70 years, HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.11-1.21; 71-80 years, HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.09-1.18, P<.001). Those using propiverine or solifenacin were less likely to discontinue treatment than those using oxybutynin (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88-0.99, P=.024 and HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87-0.98, P=.004, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Patients with UI demonstrate high discontinuation rates for anticholinergics with only slight variations between the various drugs in this category.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

: III.

Denosumab: a review of its use in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

Subcutaneous denosumab (Prolia(®) [USA, Europe]; Pralia(®) [Japan]) once every 6 months is indicated in several countries for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at increased or high risk for fractures (featured indication). In some countries, it is also indicated for use in postmenopausal women who have failed or are intolerant to other osteoporosis treatments. In several international, phase III trials (≤3 years' duration) involving more than 12,000 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis or low bone mineral density (BMD), including Asian studies, denosumab was an effective and generally well tolerated treatment. Relative to placebo, denosumab treatment significantly reduced the risk of vertebral, nonvertebral and hip fractures and increased BMD at all skeletal sites evaluated, including the lumbar spine and total hip. Furthermore, the benefits of denosumab treatment were generally evident after the first dose and were maintained during up to 8 years of treatment in an ongoing extension study. The tolerability profile of denosumab during this extension phase was consistent with that observed during the initial 3-year FREEDOM trial. At 12 months, denosumab treatment increased BMD at the total hip, lumbar spine and/or femoral neck and reduced markers of bone turnover to a significantly greater extent than oral bisphosphonates in women who were essentially bisphosphonate-naive and in those who had switched from alendronate to denosumab treatment. Further clinical experience, including an ongoing postmarketing safety study, will more fully define the long-term safety of denosumab. In the meantime, denosumab is an important option for the treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis at increased or high-risk of fractures, including in women at increased risk of fracture who are unable to take other osteoporosis treatments.

Risk factors for fracture among current, persistent users of bisphosphonates

SUMMARY

Bisphosphonate therapy reduces fracture risk but does not eliminate fracture occurrence. We determined the fracture incidence and risk factors for fractures among 14,674 bisphosphonate users in a community setting. Bisphosphonate users remained at risk of fracture, and additional measures to prevent fractures in these patients would be beneficial.

INTRODUCTION

Bisphosphonate therapy reduces but does not eliminate fracture occurrence. The incidence of fracture and risk factors for fractures among persistent, current users of bisphosphonates in a community setting have not been well studied.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 14,674 bisphosphonate users in a health maintenance organization. Patients were followed until a 3-month gap in therapy, creating a pool of highly compliant [mean medication possession ratio (MPR) of 94%] current users. We used Cox proportional hazards models to identify risk factors for fractures among these persistent, current users.

RESULTS

There were 867 fractures over the period of observation or 3.7 fractures per 100 users per year. Older patients who take multiple medications, have lower bone mineral density, have a history of prior fracture, and suffer from particular comorbidities (i.e., dementia, chronic kidney disease, and rheumatoid arthritis) are at higher risk of fracture while taking bisphosphonates.

CONCLUSION

Persistent, current bisphosphonate users remain at risk of fracture, and additional measures to prevent fractures in these patients would be of benefit.

Adherence to denosumab in the treatment of osteoporosis and its utilization in the Czech Republic

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to analyze adherence and current trends in utilization and prescription practice patterns of the anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody denosumab in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis (OP).

METHODS

The prescription-based database of the General Health Insurance Company of the Czech Republic that covers approximately 60% of the Czech population (6 million) was used as the data source. Medication possession ratio (MPR) and persistence were calculated for all patients (both OP medication-naïve and medication-experienced) with postmenopausal OP from the start of their therapy with denosumab 60 mg per ml subcutaneous injection within a period between September 2011, i.e. first denosumab availability, and May 2014. Clinical data such as fractures, co-morbidities and co-medication were not analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 7904 women treated with denosumab were analyzed; 93.8% of patients were identified as compliant (MPR ≥0.8) while 6.2% were non-compliant (MPR < 0.8). Persistence (base case, i.e. refill gap ≤30 days) was 59.1% after 12 months and 34.8% after 24 months. By 2013, i.e. within 2 years, denosumab became the second most utilized and most costly drug after oral bisphosphonates.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite relatively high MPR and persistence rate observed in denosumab treatment, adherence enhancing strategies, focused on persistence in particular, are still needed. The uptake of denosumab has been rapid, its utilization keeps rising swiftly, and denosumab already represents a significant part of the osteoporosis therapy budget.

Drug holidays: the most frequent type of noncompliance with calcium plus vitamin D supplementation in persistent patients with osteoporosis

PURPOSE

All current recommendations include calcium and vitamin D (Ca-D) as an integrated part of osteoporosis treatment. The purpose of this pilot study was to analyze compliance with a fixed combination of Ca-D in women persistent with the treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An observational study was carried out in three osteocenters in the Czech Republic. Women with osteoporosis ≥55 years of age concurrently treated with oral ibandronate were eligible. Compliance was evaluated in a period of 3 months by Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS), tablet count, and self-report. Nonpersistence was defined as a MEMS-based gap in the use of Ca-D to be 30 days or more.

RESULTS

A total of 73 patients were monitored, of which 49 patients were analyzed (target population). Based on MEMS, mean overall compliance was 71%; good compliance (≥80%) was observed in 59% of the patients. As many as 71% of the patients took drug holidays (≥3 consecutive days without intake); overall compliance of these patients was 59% and was slightly lower on Fridays and weekends. Patients without drug holidays were fully compliant (did not omit individual doses). Compliance differed according to daily time at which the patients mostly used the Ca-D. Afternoon/evening takers showed a mean overall compliance of 82% while morning/night takers only 51% (P=0.049). Based on MEMS, tablet count, and self-report, compliance ≥75% was observed in 59%, 100%, and 87% of the patients, respectively. Outcomes obtained by the three methods were not associated with each other. Undesirable concurrent ingestion of Ca-D and ibandronate was present only twice.

CONCLUSION

Despite almost perfect self-reported and tablet count-based compliance, MEMS-based compliance was relatively poor. Consecutive supplementation-free days were common; more than two-thirds of the patients took at least one drug holiday. This pilot study showed drug holiday to be the most important type of noncompliance with Ca-D in those who are persistent with the treatment.

Residual effect after oral bisphosphonate treatment and healthy adherer effects--the Swedish Adherence Register Analysis (SARA)

Little is known of the effect of alendronate and risedronate on osteoporotic fractures after discontinuation of therapy. We found that time on treatment was significantly inversely associated with the incidence of hospitalized fractures during posttreatment follow-up. Our results will inform health economic analysis of osteoporosis interventions.

INTRODUCTION

Real-world persistence to treatment of osteoporosis is well-understood, but little is known of the posttreatment residual effect on fractures. The objective of this study was to investigate the residual effect of alendronate and risedronate on fractures and assess whether a healthy adherer effect confounds the association between persistence and residual anti-fracture effect.

METHODS

A treatment-naïve cohort from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register was identified through prescriptions for alendronate or risedronate between 2005 and 2009. Persistence was estimated, and patients were stratified by time on treatment (<1 month, 1-6 months, 7-12 months, and >12 months). Survival analysis was used to study hospitalized fractures and mortality up to 18 months after treatment discontinuation.

RESULTS

The crude incidence proportion of fractures the first 6 months after treatment discontinuation ranged from 2.26% (<1 month of treatment) to 1.16% (>12 months). The corresponding estimates for month 7 to 12 after discontinuation was 3.18 to 1.96%, and for month 13 to 18 after discontinuation 2.69 to 1.95%. Adjusted regression results showed that patients persisting with therapy for >12 months had 60% lower fracture risk the first six months after treatment discontinuation (RR 0.40, p = 0.001). Patient characteristics, including prevalent fractures and co-morbidities, and posttreatment mortality were comparable across persistence durations, and we found no evidence of a healthy adherer effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Time on bisphosphonate treatment was significantly inversely associated with the incidence of hospitalized fractures during posttreatment follow-up. We found no evidence of a healthy adherer effect confounding the relationship between treatment persistence and fracture risk.

Post-fracture pharmacotherapy for women with osteoporotic fracture: analysis of a managed care population in the USA

Pharmacologic therapy is recommended to reduce future fracture risk. We examined osteoporosis medications dispensed to older women after first fracture. Only 23 % received therapy during the first year post-fracture. Prior osteoporosis therapy, a prior osteoporosis diagnosis, and older age were good predictors of post-fracture osteoporosis therapy.

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacologic therapy is recommended after osteoporotic fracture to reduce future fracture risk. The objective of this retrospective study was to examine osteoporosis therapy dispensed to women post-fracture.

METHODS

We identified women ≥50 years old in a large administrative claims database from 2003 to mid-2012 who were continuously enrolled 2 years before (baseline) and 1 year after first osteoporotic fracture. Exclusions were Paget's disease or malignant neoplasm. Pre- and post-fracture osteoporosis therapies (oral and parenteral) were assessed overall and by fracture site.

RESULTS

A total of 47,171 women of mean (SD) age of 63 (10) years were eligible; fractures included 8 % hip, 17 % vertebral, 73 % non-hip/non-vertebral, and 3 % multiple fracture sites. Only 18 % received osteoporosis therapy within 90 days and 23 % within 1 year post-fracture. Overall, 19 % of women had a prior osteoporosis diagnosis; 20 % had received osteoporosis therapy during baseline. Of 37,649 (80 %) women without baseline therapy, only 9 % initiated pharmacologic therapy within 1 year. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) of therapy within 1 year post-fracture was significantly greater for women who had received baseline osteoporosis therapy (versus none) and who had vertebral (OR 12.7, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 11.2-14.5), hip (15.2, 12.5-18.7), or non-hip/non-vertebral fracture (34.4, 31.7-37.3). Other significant predictors included pre-fracture osteoporosis diagnosis (1.6, 1.4-1.7) and older age (OR range, 1.3-1.7). Treatment adherence was significantly better among women with baseline osteoporosis diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The substantial post-fracture treatment gap represents an important unmet need for women with osteoporotic fractures. Fracture liaison or adherence programs could lead to improved post-fracture treatment rates.

Differences in persistency with teriparatide in patients with osteoporosis according to gender and health care provider

This analysis investigated the persistence of teriparatide for treatment of osteoporosis in 829 patients according to gender and health care provider treated with teriparatide. This study showed that female patients were less persistent than males and those patients treated in the practices of orthopedic surgeons were more treatment persistent than patients treated in general practitioner (GP) practices.

INTRODUCTION

The optimal persistency of teriparatide (TPTD) is of the upmost importance to ensure fracture risk reduction and pain relief. Data reporting on gender-specific or health care provider-dependent differences on health care provider-dependent persistence is currently lacking.

METHODS

We analyzed a large dataset extracted from the Disease Analyzer database (IMS Health, Germany). Out of a dataset of 15 million patients, we identified patients with osteoporosis who received first-time teriparatide prescriptions from January 2005 to December 2012.

RESULTS

All 829 patients (677 females and 152 males) were included in the study. The patients were treated by 214 general practitioners (GPs) and 143 orthopedic surgeons. After 18 months of follow-up, 39.5 % of the female and 34 % of the male patients discontinued their treatment (p = 0.0308). We found a significant difference in the discontinuation rate of patients treated by orthopedic surgeons (35.0 %) compared to patients treated by GPs (44.2 %) (p = 0.0445). Additionally, at the end of the 18 months of follow up, 39.4 % of female and 47.8 % of male patients were still on treatment. We found a highly significant decreased risk for treatment discontinuation in patients with fractures prior to treatment initiation compared to those without such fractures (hazard ratio (HR) 0.77; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.66-0.90). There was a significantly increased risk of treatment discontinuation for female patients (HR 1.38; 95 % CI 1.10-1.74) compared to male patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, female patients presented higher discontinuation rates of TPTD compared to males. Patients treated in the practices of orthopedic surgeons were more persistent than patients treated in GP practices. TPTD persistence in patients with osteoporosis is higher than with antiresorptives but is still suboptimal and needs to be improved to ensure fracture risk reductions comparable to randomized controlled trial (RCT) results.

Challenges in implementing and maintaining osteoporosis therapy

In the United States, an estimated 19% of older men and 30% of older women are at elevated risk of osteoporotic fracture and considered to be eligible for treatment. The burden of osteoporosis is similar in Europe and is projected to rise worldwide, with aging populations and increasing fracture rates accompanying urbanization. Notwithstanding its high prevalence, osteoporosis is often underdiagnosed and undertreated. Moreover, even when the diagnosis is made and the decision is taken to treat, there are remaining challenges in implementing therapy for osteoporosis. Several patient populations are particularly challenging for clinicians to treat and require further study with regard to osteoporosis therapy. These include the very elderly, who face challenges relating to adherence; men, in whom osteoporosis remains under-recognized; patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis or renal impairment, who are at increased risk of fracture; patients with preexisting gastrointestinal problems who cannot tolerate existing orally administered osteoporosis therapies; and high-risk patients who show inadequate response to therapy. Moreover, poor adherence and poor persistence with osteoporosis medications are common and result in an increased risk of fracture, higher medical costs, and increased hospitalizations. Once the decision to institute therapy is made, patient education about osteoporosis and fracture risk should be provided. This is particularly important for men, who may not be aware that osteoporosis can be a concern. Secondary prevention programs, including fracture liaison services and bone therapy groups, can help to improve adherence to therapy. Further study is needed to guide the treatment of men, the very elderly, patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and renal impairment, high-risk patients not well-controlled despite therapy, and patients with preexisting gastrointestinal conditions. Moreover, therapies are needed that are viewed as effective and safe by both physicians and patients, and as convenient to take by patients.

Expected lifetime numbers and costs of fractures in postmenopausal women with and without osteoporosis in Germany: a discrete event simulation model

BACKGROUND

Osteoporotic fractures cause a large health burden and substantial costs. This study estimated the expected fracture numbers and costs for the remaining lifetime of postmenopausal women in Germany.

METHODS

A discrete event simulation (DES) model which tracks changes in fracture risk due to osteoporosis, a previous fracture or institutionalization in a nursing home was developed. Expected lifetime fracture numbers and costs per capita were estimated for postmenopausal women (aged 50 and older) at average osteoporosis risk (AOR) and for those never suffering from osteoporosis. Direct and indirect costs were modeled. Deterministic univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

The expected fracture numbers over the remaining lifetime of a 50 year old woman with AOR for each fracture type (% attributable to osteoporosis) were: hip 0.282 (57.9%), wrist 0.229 (18.2%), clinical vertebral 0.206 (39.2%), humerus 0.147 (43.5%), pelvis 0.105 (47.5%), and other femur 0.033 (52.1%). Expected discounted fracture lifetime costs (excess cost attributable to osteoporosis) per 50 year old woman with AOR amounted to € 4,479 (€ 1,995). Most costs were accrued in the hospital € 1,743 (€ 751) and long-term care sectors € 1,210 (€ 620). Univariate sensitivity analysis resulted in percentage changes between -48.4% (if fracture rates decreased by 2% per year) and +83.5% (if fracture rates increased by 2% per year) compared to base case excess costs. Costs for women with osteoporosis were about 3.3 times of those never getting osteoporosis (€ 7,463 vs. € 2,247), and were markedly increased for women with a previous fracture.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that osteoporosis causes a substantial share of fracture costs in postmenopausal women, which strongly increase with age and previous fractures.

Current challenges in the treatment of osteoporosis: an opportunity for bazedoxifene

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis affects millions of postmenopausal women worldwide. Osteoporosis-related fractures can lead to chronic pain, disability, systemic complications, and increased risk of recurrent fractures, resulting in increased healthcare costs and mortality. Because currently available therapies have unique benefit/risk profiles, challenges remain in selecting the most appropriate treatment for each osteoporotic woman. RESEARCH AND RESULTS: Bazedoxifene (BZA), a new selective estrogen receptor modulator, is being developed for postmenopausal osteoporosis. In a 3 year, global, phase 3 study, BZA significantly reduced the risk of new vertebral fractures and nonvertebral fractures in women with higher baseline fracture risk compared with placebo. In two extensions of this study, the efficacy of BZA in reducing vertebral fracture risk was sustained over 7 years. BZA improved lumbar spine and total hip bone mineral density compared with placebo at 3 and 5 years, and demonstrated a favorable safety/tolerability profile, with no endometrial or breast stimulation. BZA was cost-effective compared with raloxifene in a 3 year, head-to-head comparative trial. Indirect comparisons further suggest that BZA may be as effective as bisphosphonates in reducing risk of nonvertebral fractures in women at high risk of fracture. BZA demonstrated efficacy and safety for treating postmenopausal osteoporosis over 7 years, particularly in women at a higher fracture risk.

CONCLUSION

Because of its specific pharmacologic profile, BZA may be appropriate for postmenopausal women seeking a tolerable, safe, effective, and cost-effective long-term osteoporosis treatment.

Vitamin D status and parathyroid hormone concentrations influence the skeletal response to zoledronate and denosumab

Studies suggest that optimal vitamin D status is required for the maximal effect of antiresorptive agents. We investigated the relationship between vitamin D status, serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations, and change in bone mineral density (BMD) following iv zoledronate and denosumab. We carried out a retrospective analysis of 111 patients, mean age 70 (SD 13) years, 89 women and 22 men, prescribed zoledronate and 43 postmenopausal women treated with denosumab for osteoporosis. We measured BMD at the lumbar spine (LS) and total hip (TH), serum 25 (OH) vitamin D, PTH, and bone turnover markers (plasma CTX, P1NP) at 1 year. In patients on zoledronate, BMD increased at the LS and TH (mean LS change [SEM] = 2.6 % [0.5 %], mean TH change = 1.05 % [0.5 %], p < 0.05). A significant increase in BMD was seen at the LS only in the denosumab group (p = 0.001). Significant decreases in CTX and P1NP were observed at 12 months in both treatment groups. At baseline and at 12 months, 34 % and 23 % of the patients on zoledronate had a serum vitamin D of <50 nmol/L, respectively. The mean PTH concentration in patients with 25 (OH) vitamin D <50 nmol/L was 44 ng/L (SEM 16.6). Patients with PTH concentration <44 ng/L had significantly higher increases in TH BMD compared to those with PTH >44 ng/L (zoledronate 1.9 [0.83] vs. -0.43 [0.81], p = 0.04; denosumab 4.1 [0.054] vs. -1.7 [0.04], p = 0.004). Optimal vitamin D status and PTH concentrations improve the skeletal response to zoledronate and denosumab.

Bone health in cancer patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines

There are three distinct areas of cancer management that make bone health in cancer patients of increasing clinical importance. First, bone metastases are common in many solid tumours, notably those arising from the breast, prostate and lung, as well as multiple myeloma, and may cause major morbidity including fractures, severe pain, nerve compression and hypercalcaemia. Through optimum multidisciplinary management of patients with bone metastases, including the use of bone-targeted treatments such as potent bisphosphonates or denosumab, it has been possible to transform the course of advanced cancer for many patients resulting in a major reduction in skeletal complications, reduced bone pain and improved quality of life. Secondly, many of the treatments we use to treat cancer patients have effects on reproductive hormones, which are critical for the maintenance of normal bone remodelling. This endocrine disturbance results in accelerated bone loss and an increased risk of osteoporosis and fractures that can have a significant negative impact on the lives of the rapidly expanding number of long-term cancer survivors. Finally, the bone marrow micro-environment is also intimately involved in the metastatic processes required for cancer dissemination, and there are emerging data showing that, at least in some clinical situations, the use of bone-targeted treatments can reduce metastasis to bone and has potential impact on patient survival.

Optimizing fracture prevention: the fracture liaison service, an observational study

The response rate to the invitation to the fracture liaison service and reasons for non-response were evaluated in 2,207 fragility fracture patients. Fifty-one percent responded; non-responders were most often not interested (38 %) or were hip fracture patients. After 1 year of treatment, 88 % was still persistent and 2 % had a new fracture.

INTRODUCTION

To increase the percentage of elderly fracture patients undergoing a dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurement, and to investigate why some patients did not respond to invitation to our fracture liaison service (FLS).

METHODS

In four Dutch hospitals, fracture patients ≥ 50 years were invited through a written or personal invitation at the surgical outpatient department, for a DXA measurement and visit to our FLS. Patients who did not respond were contacted by telephone. In patients diagnosed with osteoporosis, treatment was started. Patients were contacted every 3 months during 1 year to assess drug persistence and the occurrence of subsequent fractures.

RESULTS

Of the 2,207 patients who were invited, 50.6 % responded. Most frequent reasons for not responding included: not interested (38 %), already screened/under treatment for osteoporosis (15.7 %), physically unable to attend the clinic (11.5 %), and death (5.2 %). Hip fracture patients responded less frequently (29 %) while patients with a wrist (60 %) or ankle fracture (65.2 %) were more likely to visit the clinic. In 337 responding patients, osteoporosis was diagnosed and treatment was initiated. After 12 months of follow-up, 88 % of the patients were still persistent with anti-osteoporosis therapy and only 2 % suffered a subsequent clinical fracture.

CONCLUSION

In elderly fracture patients, the use of a FLS leads to an increased response rate, a high persistence to drug treatment, and a low rate of subsequent clinical fractures. Additional programs for hip fracture patients are required, as these patients have a low response rate.

Use of an educational support program to assist patients receiving injectable osteoporosis treatment: experience with teriparatide

OBJECTIVE

Low treatment adherence and persistence are important considerations in the management of chronic disorders such as osteoporosis, as they are linked to the reduced effectiveness of drug therapy. As teriparatide (Forsteo, Eli Lilly and Company, Alcobendas, Spain) is administered by subcutaneous injection using a customized delivery device for 24 months to reduce fracture risk in patients with osteoporosis, an educational support program was developed to assist patients with correctly administering the treatment.

METHODS

All patients in Spain can voluntarily participate in this ongoing program, which consists of up to 22 phone calls, by a qualified and licensed nurse trained in use of the delivery device, that are designed to improve patients' knowledge of, and to provide a reminder as to how to use, the device. Patients are also sent educational material regarding the delivery device and osteoporosis, and regularly receive needles suitable for the device. This study presents persistence data for all 23,069 patients registered in the program and prescribed teriparatide between September 2007 and June 2010.

RESULTS

Persistence in the program was 90.8% at 3 months, 83.5% at 6 months, 74.8% at 12 months, 68.5% at 18 months, and 64.1% at 24 months. Patient satisfaction with the educational support program was high at all assessment times, and patients generally found the delivery device easy to use.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that patients from all provinces in Spain with severe osteoporosis receiving teriparatide and enrolled in an educational support program had high persistence and satisfaction with the program. However, no control group was included in these analyses and it is possible that selection bias occurred. It is suggested that patient-based strategies similar to this could be beneficial for all long-term treatments.

The non-interventional BonViva Intravenous Versus Alendronate (VIVA) study: real-world adherence and persistence to medication, efficacy, and safety, in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis

Adherence and persistence to oral bisphosphonates in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis is suboptimal. In this study, patients were treated with either oral or intravenous bisphosphonates. The increased adherence and persistence observed in patients receiving intravenous medication compared with those receiving oral medication may improve health outcomes.

INTRODUCTION

Poor adherence and persistence to oral medication are often observed in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO). The purpose of the non-interventional BonViva Intravenous Versus Alendronate (VIVA) study was to determine whether, in a real-world setting, (1) increased adherence and persistence to medication would be observed in women with PMO receiving intravenous (i.v.) ibandronate versus oral alendronate, (2) a correlation exists between adherence and persistence to medication and drug efficacy, and (3) any unexpected adverse events/serious adverse events (AEs/SAEs) may occur.

METHODS

The study was conducted in 632 centers in Germany. A total of 6,064 females with PMO were enrolled and recruited into one of two treatment arms: quarterly i.v. administration of 3 mg ibandronate or weekly oral medication of 70 mg alendronate, for 12 months. At the end of the study, adherence and persistence to medication, new osteoporotic fractures, mobility, use of analgesics, and AEs/SAEs were determined.

RESULTS

Greater adherence and persistence to medication were observed in the ibandronate treatment arm compared with the alendronate treatment arm. Although there was no significant difference in the number of patients with new vertebral, hip, or forearm fractures between treatment arms, a significantly greater increase in mobility and decrease in the use of analgesics were reported in the ibandronate treatment arm. No unexpected AEs/SAEs occurred in either arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence and persistence to medication were greater in women with PMO receiving i.v. ibandronate compared with those receiving oral alendronate. This may have led to an increase in mobility and a decrease in pain in these patients.

Bisphosphonate use and subsequent hip fracture in South Korea

We determined the incidence of second hip fracture and evaluated whether compliant and persistent users of bisphosphonate had a lower incidence of second hip fracture after prior hip fracture, from a national claim registry.

INTRODUCTION

Bisphosphonate is prescribed worldwide for the primary prevention of osteoporotic fracture. However, the association between adherent use of bisphosphonate and prevention of second hip fracture is unclear. Our purpose was to determine whether the adherent use of bisphosphonate was associated with a decreased risk of second hip fracture in South Korea, using a nationwide database.

METHODS

From 2007 to 2011, first and second hip fractures were identified using the ICD-10 and procedure code form from the nationwide database of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. Compliant use of bisphosphonate was defined as a patient medication possession ratio of 80 or more. Persistent users were defined patients with a refill gap of 30 days or less. We compared the incidence of second hip fracture in compliant and persistent users and non-users.

RESULTS

Among 59,782 patients with first hip fracture, in this study, 1,336 second hip fracture occurred after the initial hip fracture during the study period. The mean age at the first hip fracture was 75.4 years (range, 50 to 100 years). The cumulative 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year incidence of second hip fracture was 1.0% (552/59,782), 1.9% (1,123/59,782), and 2.2% (1,336/59,782), respectively. After multivariate analysis, compliant and persistent use of bisphosphonate was significantly independent protectors for second hip fracture (HR, 0.595; 95% CI, 0.400-0.885; HR, 0.433; 95% CI, 0.327-0.573, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Compliant and persistent use of bisphosphonate decreases the risk of second hip fracture, in terms of secondary prevention.

Bisphosphonates adherence for treatment of osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is a disease of bone metabolism in which bisphosphonates (BPS) are the most common medications used in its treatment, whose main objective is to reduce the risk of fractures. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review on BPs adherence for treatment of osteoporosis.

METHODS

Systematic review of articles on BPs adherence for treatment of osteoporosis, indexed on MEDLINE (via PubMed) databases, from inception of databases until January 2013. Search terms were "Adherence, Medication" (MeSH term), "Bisphosphonates" (MeSH term), and "Osteoporosis" (MeSH term).

RESULTS

Of the 78 identified studies, 27 met the eligibility criteria. Identified studies covered a wide range of aspects regarding adherence and associated factors, adherence and fracture, adherence and BPs dosage. The studies are mostly observational, conducted with women over 45 years old, showing low rates of adherence to treatment. Several factors may influence adherence: socio-economic and cultural, participation of physicians when guidance is given to the patient, the use of bone turnover markers, and use of generic drugs. The monthly dosage is associated with greater adherence compared to weekly dosage.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the methodological differences between the studies, the results converge to show that adherence to treatment of osteoporosis with BPs is still inadequate. Further experimental studies are needed to evaluate the adherence and suggest new treatment options.

The over time development of chronic illness self-management patterns: a longitudinal qualitative study

Background

There currently exists a vast amount of literature concerning chronic illness self-management, however the developmental patterns and sustainability of self-management over time remain largely unknown. This paper aims to describe the patterns by which different chronic illness self-management behaviors develop and are maintained over time.

Method

Twenty-one individuals newly diagnosed with chronic illnesses (e.g., diabetes, rheumatism, ischemic heart disease, multiple sclerosis, chronic renal disease, inflammatory bowel disease) were repeatedly interviewed over two-and-a-half years. The interviews were conducted in Sweden from 2006 to 2008. A total of 81 narrative interviews were analyzed with an interpretive description approach.

Results

The participants’ self-management behaviors could be described in four different developmental patterns: consistent, episodic, on demand, and transitional. The developmental patterns were related to specific self-management behaviors. Most participants took long-term medications in a consistent pattern, whereas exercise was often performed according to an episodic pattern. Participants managed health crises (e.g., angina, pain episodes) according to an on demand pattern and everyday changes due to illness (e.g., adaptation of work and household activities) according to a transitional pattern. All of the participants used more than one self-management pattern.

Conclusion

The findings show that self-management does not develop as one uniform pattern. Instead different self-management behaviors are enacted in different patterns. Therefore, it is likely that self-management activities require support strategies tailored to each behavior’s developmental pattern.

Persistence with bisphosphonates in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective database analysis

BACKGROUND

In women with breast cancer and bone metastasis, compliance to antiresorptive treatment is of upmost importance to ensure maximum effectiveness in clinical practice. The aim of our study was to investigate persistence with oral and intravenous bisphosphonates (BIS) in a large group of women with metastatic breast cancer and to identify the determinants of non-persistence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We used data from the Disease Analyzer database (IMS Health, Germany), which includes 2,067 general practices and 397 gynaecological practices. From a dataset of 20 million patients, we identified 1,045 patients diagnosed between January 2001 and December 2010 with bone metastasis (ICD 10: C795) following breast cancer (ICD 10: C50) with first-time cancer-related bisphosphonate prescriptions (ATC: M03B4). Of these, 763 patients received intravenous treatment, and 280 patients received oral BIS treatment.

RESULTS

After 1 year, 35.3 % of patients treated with intravenous, and 45.6 % of patients treated with oral bisphosphonates discontinued their therapy (p = 0.002). Multivariate Cox Regression analyses showed a significant increased risk of treatment discontinuation in patients using intravenous BIS (HR: 0.82) compared with oral BIS. Patients younger than 50 (HR: 1.52) were most likely to discontinue treatment compared with the reference group of women over 70. The use of other treatments, such as chemotherapy or hormone therapy, was associated with a decreased risk of treatment discontinuation. Moreover, treatment discontinuation was higher in West Germany compared with East Germany (HR: 1.65) and in patients covered under private health insurance (HR: 1.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Persistence with all bisphosphonate treatments in women with breast cancer and bone metastasis is low and needs to be significantly increased to improved outcomes in clinical practice. Further research is required to understand this complex issue.

Persistence in patients with breast cancer treated with tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors: a retrospective database analysis

Compliance and persistence are often underestimated in breast cancer (BC) treatment. The aim of our study was to analyze the persistence with tamoxifen (TAM) and aromatase inhibitors (AI) in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive BC and to identify determinants of non-persistence. We used data of the Disease Analyzer database (IMS HEALTH, Germany) including 2,067 general practices and 397 gynecological practices. Out of a dataset of 15 million patients, we identified BC patients with a first-time TAM or AI prescriptions from October 2001 to December 2010. For persistence analyses, 12,412 women on tamoxifen, 2,796 on anastrozole, 647 on exemestane, and 1,657 on letrozole met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Within 3 years of follow-up, the discontinuation rates increased to 52.2 % for tamoxifen, 47 % for anastrozole, 55.1 % for exemestane, and 44.3 % for letrozole treated women. A minor proportion of patients switched to a different endocrine treatment; 33 % tamoxifen, 20 % anastrozole, 22.9 % exemestane, and 23 % letrozole. The multivariate hazard ratios of the cox regression models showed that patients younger than 50 were most likely to discontinue initial therapy when compared with the reference group of women over 70 (p < 0.001). In contrast, patients treated in gynecologist practice had significantly longer persistence than patients who obtained their prescriptions in general practitioner practice (p < 0.001). In addition, the presence of the co morbidities like diabetes (p < 0.001) or depression (p < 0.002) was also associated with decreased risk of treatment discontinuation. Persistence with all endocrine treatments in women with hormone-receptor-positive BC is low and needs to be significantly increased to improved outcome in clinical practice. Further research is required to understand this complex issue.

Improved real-life adherence of 6-monthly denosumab injections due to positive feedback based on rapid 6-month BMD increase and good safety profile

Almost 50 % of osteoporosis (OP) patients discontinue bisphosphonate (BP) therapy within 1-2 years after the start of their treatment. Denosumab's longer dosing interval with its administration every 6 months (Q6M) as a subcutaneous (sc) injection might result in a better real-life treatment adherence and persistence than weekly or monthly oral BP treatment regimen. The objectives of this open, investigator-initiated, prospective, observational, single-center study were to evaluate adherence with denosumab 60 mg sc every 6 months (Q6M) (Prolia(®)) injections in osteoporotic patients in a routine clinical care setting and to describe whether positive feedback to OP patients based on measured bone mineral density (BMD) increases and good safety profile have an impact on patients' real-life adherence. Results indicate that the rarity of adverse events and reduced dosage frequency together with the consistency of rapid and highly significant increases in BMD already after 6 months of denosumab therapy used as a positive reinforcement during doctor-patient interactions had a significant, positive impact on osteoporotic patient's adherence to continue with the 6-monthly sc denosumab injections.

Quality of life and health status with zoledronic acid and generic alendronate--a secondary analysis of the Rapid Onset and Sustained Efficacy (ROSE) study in postmenopausal women with low bone mass

SUMMARY

The ROSE study compared annual infusion with zoledronic acid and weekly generic alendronate. No significant differences in quality of life or health status between treatment groups were observed. Adherence to alendronate during the study was high, with 80.9% of patients achieving adequate adherence.

INTRODUCTION

A secondary analysis to evaluate quality of life, health status, adherence to alendronate and therapy preference in postmenopausal women with low bone mass who received treatment with zoledronic acid or alendronate was conducted.

METHODS

Postmenopausal women with low bone mass were randomised 2:1 to receive an annual infusion of zoledronic acid or weekly oral generic alendronate in this open-label, multicentre study. Changes in quality of life and health status were assessed using questionnaires at baseline and month 12. Adherence to alendronate was assessed by the investigator and/or study personnel, and subjective therapy preference was assessed using a questionnaire at month 12.

RESULTS

Patients were randomised to zoledronic acid (n = 408) and alendronate (n = 191). Overall, there were no significant differences in quality of life between zoledronic acid and alendronate. However, improvements in quality of life with zoledronic acid versus alendronate could be detected by posthoc analysis in patients with previous fractures. There were no significant differences in health status between patients receiving zoledronic acid or alendronate. Adherence to alendronate during the study was high, with 80.9% of patients achieving adequate adherence. A total of 81% of patients who had received zoledronic acid indicated that they would prefer to continue with that treatment, and 43% of the patients who received oral alendronate would like to switch to zoledronic acid.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in quality of life between patients receiving zoledronic acid or alendronate.

Time to onset of antifracture efficacy and year-by-year persistence of effect of zoledronic acid in women with osteoporosis

Oral bisphosphonates reduce fracture risk in osteoporotic patients but are often associated with poor compliance, which may impair their antifracture effects. This post hoc analysis assessed the time to onset and persistence of the antifracture effect of zoledronic acid, a once-yearly bisphosphonate infusion, in women with osteoporosis. Data from 9355 women who were randomized in two placebo-controlled pivotal trials were included. Endpoints included reduction in the rate of any clinical fracture at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months in the zoledronic acid group compared with placebo, and the year-by-year incidence of all clinical fractures over 3 years. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the timing of onset of antifracture efficacy. A generalized estimating equation model was used to assess fracture reduction for the 3 consecutive years of treatment, thereby evaluating persistence of effect. Safety results from women in the two studies were collated. Zoledronic acid reduced the risk of all clinical fractures at 12 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-0.92, p = 0.0050) with significant reductions maintained at all subsequent time points. Year-by-year analysis showed that zoledronic acid reduced the risk for all clinical fractures compared with the placebo group in each of the 3 years (year 1: odds ratio [OR] = 0.74, 95% CI 0.60-0.91, p = 0.0044; year 2: OR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.42-0.66, p < 0.0001; year 3: OR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.48-0.77, p < 0.0001). This antifracture effect was persistent over 3 years, with the reductions in years 2 and 3 slightly larger than in year 1 (p = 0.097). This analysis shows that zoledronic acid offered significant protection from clinical fractures as early as 12 months. When administered annually, its beneficial effects persisted for at least 3 years.

Clinical utility of risedronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis: patient considerations with delayed-release formulation

Bisphosphonates are the most widely prescribed treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis, secondary osteoporosis, and male osteoporosis. Notwithstanding their high effectiveness and favorable safety profile, the adherence to bisphosphonate treatment remains low. Different treatment strategies aim to improve the clinical effectiveness of bisphosphonate therapy. This review paper assesses the clinical utility of oral intermittent risedronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. The new delayed-release risedronate formulation is a safer and easy to use alternative to other risedronate therapy. Oral risedronate, a potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, has been extensively studied using daily regimens. A new intermittent (weekly) dosing regimen confirmed its clinical effectiveness in relation to vertebral and nonvertebral fracture prevention. The absence of significant differences in the incidence of adverse effects confirmed the favorable tolerability of the weekly dosage. In efforts to improve patient adherence to treatment, an innovative, delayed-release formulation of risedronate, which ensures adequate bioavailability of the active compound when taken with food, was introduced. The once-weekly delayed-release formulation of risedronate proved to be noninferior to the daily dosage of risedronate in terms of bone mineral density and markers of bone turnover. In addition, the incidence of new morphometric vertebral fractures was comparable in both treatment regimens. The new delayed-release formulation of risedronate showed a favorable safety profile. Delayed-release risedronate is a promising, new, effective, and convenient alternative to current bisphosphonate treatments. It appears to allow better patient adherence to antiresorptive treatment.

Bisphosphonate therapy for osteoporosis: combining optimal fracture risk reduction with patient preference

OBJECTIVE

To review current use of bisphosphonates as first-line therapy for osteoporosis, with an emphasis on the importance of patient compliance and persistence.

METHODS

The US National Library of Medicine was used to obtain the relevant information on current bisphosphonate treatment for osteoporosis management, and patient compliance and persistence with treatment.

RESULTS

Bisphosphonates have demonstrated efficacy in fracture risk reduction, although differences may exist with respect to both onset of action and the site of fracture risk reduction. Good compliance and persistence with osteoporosis therapy is needed to reduce fracture risk, but currently the willingness of patients to conform to their prescribed course of treatment is suboptimal. Intermittent dosing schedules have been developed to facilitate ease of medication-taking in order to help improve rates of compliance and persistence. When primary care physicians provide patients with information about the established efficacy and safety of medications, as well as clarifying the crucial link between continued, consistent treatment and fracture risk reduction, patients are more likely to understand the importance of taking their medications consistently in order to maximize the effectiveness of the therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

A therapy that provides vertebral and nonvertebral efficacy, is well-tolerated, and offers a flexible dosing regimen is likely to enhance patient compliance and persistence, and provide optimal fracture protection. Numerous studies have consistently demonstrated that medication compliance and persistence are well-correlated with fracture risk reduction.

Clinical utility of denosumab for treatment of bone loss in men and women

While most older patients with osteoporosis are treated with antiresorptive bisphosphonates such as alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, and zoledronic acid, such drugs have side effects, remain in bone for extended periods, and lead to poor adherence to chronic treatment. Denosumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody and antiresorptive agent that works by decreasing the activity of the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand. In major trials in postmenopausal women, denosumab increased bone mineral density by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in the spine, hip, and distal third of the radius and decreased vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip fractures. Denosumab is administered by subcutaneous injection every six months, suggesting that adherence may be improved with such therapy. In addition, pharmacokinetic studies measuring bone turnover markers imply that the antiresorptive effect diminishes more quickly over time. Whether these properties will lead to fewer long-term side effects needs to be proven. Denosumab has also been studied in men with prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy. These men, at high risk for fracture, also have increases in spine, hip, and forearm dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, as well as fewer morphologic vertebral fractures on x-ray. Denosumab is approved for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in the US and Europe and for men on androgen deprivation therapy in Europe.