Twenty common errors in the diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic joint infection

Diagnostic value of fluoroscopy-guided hip aspiration for periprosthetic joint infection

PURPOSE

To assess the value of preoperative joint aspiration in detecting periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty and to compare these with the clinical findings, serum markers, and intraoperative findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fluoroscopically guided hip aspirations in patients with pain after hip arthroplasty were retrospectively reviewed from January 2014 to December 2018. All hips underwent subsequent revision hip arthroplasty. Antibiotics were discontinued at least 2 weeks before the aspiration. The 2018 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria served as a standard of reference for PJI. Clinical, serum, synovial, and intraoperative parameters were recorded in all patients. Correlations between all parameters with PJI diagnosis were analyzed using linear and logistic regression models with ROC analysis.

RESULTS

In 202 hips that included 91 septic hips, hip aspiration (AUC = 0.78) and intraoperative (0.80) parameters performed better than serum-based tests (0.64) and clinical parameters (0.68) in detecting PJI. Using MSIS criteria as a standard of reference, hip aspiration had a sensitivity of 64.0% and an accuracy of 78.5% for cultures and a sensitivity of 74.2% and an accuracy of 82.1% for synovial polymorphonuclear neutrophils% (PMN%). Results substantially improved sensitivity after excluding patients that were treated with antibiotics, particularly culture results.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative hip aspiration showed good diagnostic performance in diagnosing PJI compared with MSIS criteria as a standard of reference. But a negative result from aspirate could not rule out PJI. Based on our findings, hip aspiration is an essential test for treatment planning in patients with pain after hip arthroplasty.

Tissue-level cytokines in a rodent model of chronic implant-associated infection

Systemic cytokine concentrations have been extensively studied in implant-associated infections, providing sensitive diagnostic markers. However, less is known about the relationships of tissue-level cytokines surrounding the joint. The aim of this study was to define the cytokine profiles of tissues to investigate the use of these cytokines as markers of debridement in chronic joint infection. Using a rodent model, muscle samples were obtained from rats following Kirschner wire implantation and infection with Staphylococcus aureus to determine if: (1) differences exist in cytokine concentrations with proximity to infection, and (2) localized infection-specific markers can be identified on a tissue level to potentially serve as debridement markers in the future. Samples were collected from 4 distinct locations, and the concentrations of interleukin(IL)-1α, IL-1β, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-13, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, interferon-γ, and tumor necrosis factor-α were quantified in each sample, relative to the amount of tissue. Cytokine concentrations differed with proximity to the joint when implant or infection was present, and tissues at the operative knee joint showed the highest levels of most cytokines. Additionally, IL-1β, IL-4, and IL-6 showed promise, beyond diagnostics, as tissue-level indicators of infection response. Ultimately, this study illustrated that tissue-level evaluation provided insight into infection-specific response, and these markers may be useful for guiding the debridement of implant-associated infections.

Bacterial DNA screening to characterize surgical site infection risk in orthopaedic patients

Purpose

To provide an initial characterization of relevant bacterial DNA profiles for patients undergoing closed-fracture fixation or total joint arthroplasties.

Patients and methods

Swabs were collected and analyzed using Polymerase Chain Reaction from adult patients undergoing closed-fracture fixation or total shoulder, knee, or hip arthroplasties.

Results

Bacterial DNA profiles varied across the different orthopaedic patient populations, and produced uncharacteristic profile shifts with direct relevance to each clinical infection.

Conclusion

Findings provide a foundational dataset regarding bacterial colonization of relevant anatomic sites that can act as sources of surgical site infections for patients.

sCD28, sCD80, sCTLA-4, and sBTLA Are Promising Markers in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches for Aseptic Loosening and Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Aseptic prosthetic loosening and periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) are among the most frequent complications after total knee/hip joint arthroplasty (TJA). Current research efforts focus on understanding the involvement of the immune system in these frequent complications. Different immune cell types have already been implicated in aseptic prosthetic loosening and PJI. The aim of this study was to systematically analyze aspirates from knee and hip joints, evaluating the qualitative and quantitative composition of soluble immunoregulatory markers, with a focus on co-inhibitory and co-stimulatory markers. It has been shown that these molecules play important roles in immune regulation in cancer and chronic infectious diseases, but they have not been investigated in the context of joint replacement. For this purpose, aspirates from control joints (i.e., native joints without implanted prostheses), joints with TJA (no signs of infection or aseptic loosening), joints with aseptic implant failure (AIF; i.e., aseptic loosening), and joints with PJI were collected. Fourteen soluble immunoregulatory markers were assessed using bead-based multiplex assays. In this study, it could be shown that the concentrations of the analyzed immunoregulatory molecules vary between control, TJA, AIF, and PJI joints. Comparing TJA patients to CO patients, sCD80 was significantly elevated. The marker sBTLA was significantly elevated in AIF joints compared to TJA joints. In addition, a significant difference for eight markers could be shown when comparing the AIF and CO groups (sCD27, sCTLA-4, sCD137, sCD80, sCD28, sTIM-3, sPD-1, sBTLA). A significant difference was also reached for nine soluble markers when the PJI and CO groups were compared (sLAG-3, sCTLA-4, sCD27, sCD80, sCD28, sTIM-3, sPD-1, IDO, sBTLA). In summary, the analyzed immunoregulatory markers could be useful for diagnostic purposes as well as to develop new therapeutic approaches for AIF and PJI.

Adherence to a reliable PJI diagnostic protocol minimizes unsuspected positive cultures rate

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the incidence of unsuspected PJI when prosthetic revisions are thoroughly evaluated by PJI dedicated orthopedic surgeon before surgery. The hypothesis is that the incidence of unsuspected PJI is reduced by applying this protocol.

METHODS

This is a historical cohort study carried out in one university hospital. The prosthetic revision assessment was carried out in January 2019. From that date on, all patients that were programmed for hip or knee revision (either by an orthopedic surgeon specialized or not in septic revisions) were scheduled for a preoperative visit with the same orthopedic surgeon specialized in septic revisions. The diagnostic algorithm applied was based on the Pro-Implant Foundation diagnostic criteria. Prior to the revision assessment, the indication for joint aspiration was done at the surgeons' discretion (non-specialized in septic revisions) and the preoperative identification of PJI was also done by a hip or knee surgeon (not specialized in septic surgery).

RESULTS

Based on the PIF criteria, there were 15 infections among the revisions in group 1 and 18 PJI in group 2 (p > 0.05). The most interesting finding was that there were 7 patients with unsuspected positive cultures in group 1. That represents 11% of all revisions. No patient in group 2 was found with unsuspected positive cultures (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A thorough PJI diagnostic algorithm should be implemented before prosthetic revision to avoid unsuspected positive cultures.

Postoperative Infection Risk in Total Joint Arthroplasty After Perioperative IV Corticosteroid Administration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

BACKGROUND

Perioperative corticosteroid administration is associated with reduced postoperative nausea, pain, and enhanced recovery after surgery. However, potential complications including wound and periprosthetic joint infections remain a concern for surgeons after total joint arthroplasty (TJA).

METHODS

A systematic review of the search databases PubMed, Google Scholar, and EMBASE was made in January 2021 to identify comparative studies evaluating infection risk after perioperative corticosteroid administration in TJA. PRISMA guidelines were used for this review. Meta-analysis was used to assess infection risk in accordance with joint and corticosteroid dosing regimen used.

RESULTS

201 studies were returned after initial search strategy, with 29 included for review after application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies were categorized as using low- or high-dose corticosteroid with single or repeat dosing regimens. Single low-dose corticosteroid administration was not associated with an increased risk of infection (P = .4; CI = 0.00-0.00). Single high-dose corticosteroid was not associated with an increased infection risk (P = .3; CI = 0.00-0.01) nor did repeat low-dose regimens result in increased risk of infection (P = .8; CI = -0.02-0.02). Studies assessing repeat high-dosing regimens reported no increased infection, with small numbers of participants included. No significant risk difference in infection risk was noted in hip (P = .59; CI = -0.03-0.02) or knee (P = .2; CI = 0.00-0.01) arthroplasty. Heterogeneity in patient profiles included in studies to date was noted.

CONCLUSION

Use of perioperative corticosteroid in TJA does not appear to be associated with increased risk of postoperative infection in patients with limited comorbidities. Further research is warranted to evaluate postoperative complications after TJA in these at-risk patient populations.

Intravenous fosfomycin for the treatment of patients with bone and joint infections: a review

INTRODUCTION

Fosfomycin is a wide spectrum bactericidal antibiotic with a unique mode of action, low toxicity, and good penetration in tissues with deep-seated infections, including bone and joint infections.

AREAS COVERED

Data were extracted from 19 published articles. Three hundred and sixty-five patients, with broad age range, received intravenous fosfomycin for the treatment of bone and joint infections (including arthritis, acute and chronic osteomyelitis, discitis, periprosthetic joint infection). Fosfomycin was given as part of a combination antimicrobial therapy in the majority of patients (93.7%). The dosage of fosfomycin ranged from 4 g/day (in one case) to 24 g/day. The dosage of fosfomycin, in some cases, mostly pediatric, was calculated based on body weight, ranging from 50 mg/kg/day to 250 mg/kg/day. The duration of fosfomycin treatment ranged from a couple of days up to 3 months. The most common isolated pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus (38.9%). Three hundred patients (82.2%) were successfully treated. Fosfomycin was well tolerated, as few patients developed mild adverse events, mostly gastrointestinal discomfort, hypernatremia, skin rash, and neutropenia.

EXPERT OPINION

The available data suggests that intravenous fosfomycin may be beneficial for the treatment of patients with bone and joint infections, especially when used as part of a combination antibiotic regimen.

Genomic Analysis of Cutibacterium acnes Strains Isolated from Prosthetic Joint Infections

Cutibacterium acnes is a common cause of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). The C. acnes population can be divided into six main phylotypes (IA₁, IA₂, IB, IC, II and III) that are associated with different clinical conditions and normal skin. A single-locus sequence typing (SLST) scheme can distinguish ten main SLST types: A-E (all IA₁), F (IA₂), G (IC), H (IB), K (II), L (III). We genome-sequenced and compared 16 strains of C. acnes isolated from healthy skin (n = 4) and PJIs (n = 12), including six PJI cases with a good outcome (four shoulder PJIs, one hip PJI, one knee PJI) and six with infection relapse (three shoulder PJIs, three hip PJIs). The sequenced strains belonged to four different phylotypes (IA₁, IA₂, IB and II) and seven different SLST types. All five type IB strains (all SLST type H1) were PJI isolates (three hip PJIs, two shoulder PJIs), and four of these caused infection relapse (three hip PJIs, one shoulder PJI). Isolates from PJI cases with a good outcome belonged to three different phylotypes (IA, IB, II). Interestingly, four strains (three strains from PJI cases with good outcome and one strain from healthy skin) contained a linear plasmid; these strains belonged to different SLST types (A1, C1, F4, H1) and were isolated in three different hospitals. This study suggests that type IB strains have the potential to cause infection relapse, in particular regarding hip PJIs. Moreover, our study revealed that strains belonging to the same SLST type can differ in their accessory genome in different geographic locations, indicative of microevolution.

Diagnostic accuracy of the BJI InoPlex™ (Diaxonhit) immunoassay on blood samples for periprosthetic joint infection in complex microbiological situations. Preliminary results of 24 cases in a French Reference Center for Complex Bone and Joint Infection (CRIOAC)

BACKGROUND

While joint aspiration is the benchmark for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), the results can be flawed because certain bacteria are difficult to culture, the patient is on concurrent antibiotic therapy or in some cases, repeated joint aspirations confer conflicting results. The BJI InoPlex™ (Diaxonhit) is a multiplex ELISA (Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay) that measures the immune response (presence of specific IgG) to certain bacterial species from three families: Staphylococcus (8 antigens) epidermidis, aureus and lugdunensis, Streptococcus B (4 antigens) and Cutibacterium acnes (4 antigens). This assay is done with peripherally collected blood. However, there are few published studies about this assay, especially if the microbiological diagnosis is in doubt in cases of suspected chronic PJI. This led us to conduct a retrospective study in a French tertiary care center to determine 1) the sensitivity and specificity of the BJI InoPlex™, 2) its positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) and 3) what causes diagnostic errors.

HYPOTHESIS

The BJI InoPlex has a sensitivity/specificity and PPV/NPV above 75%.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The BJI InoPlex was used 24 times on 24 patients between January 2016 and January 2017 in scenarios where the microbiological diagnosis was difficult: 1 with on-going antibiotic therapy, 13 conflicting repeat joint aspirations, 10 negative cultures with history of infection and/or clinical evidence of a PJI. The series consisted of 11 hip arthroplasty and 13 knee arthroplasty cases. The results of the BJI InoPlex test were compared to the MusculoSkeletal Infection Society (MSIS) the criteria for a joint infection.

RESULTS

For the bacterial species covered by the test, the sensitivity of the BJI InoPlex for diagnosing a chronic PJI based on the 2018 MSIS criteria was 50%, the specificity was 56%, the PPV was 36% and the NPV was 69%.

DISCUSSION

While innovative, minimally invasive, and rapid (results in a few hours), the BJI InoPlex does not provide an effective diagnosis of chronic PJI in complex microbiological situations. In this study, we used the test in the most difficult situations possible and on a small number of patients, which may explain why the results were not as good as in other studies. Its current performance and cost mean there is no role for it in our algorithm for treating patients with a suspected PJI, contrary to other biomarkers. Its spectrum must include other bacterial strains involved in chronic PJI. Knowledge of the specific infectious agent increases its diagnostic value, it could be used to monitor the outcome of a PJI, although other studies would be needed to support this use.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV-Retrospective diagnostic study.

Does the alpha-defensin lateral flow test conserve its diagnostic properties in a larger population of chronic complex periprosthetic infections? Enlargement to 112 tests, from 42 tests in a preliminary study, in a reference center

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection (PPI) is crucial for management of bone and joint infection. The preoperative gold-standard is joint aspiration, providing results after 2-14 days' culture, with non-negligible false negative rates due to the fragility of certain micro-organisms and/or prior antibiotic treatment. The Synovasure™ alpha-defensin lateral flow test (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN, USA) contributes within minutes to joint fluid diagnosis of almost all infectious agents, including in case of concomitant antibiotic therapy. Validity remains controversial, notably in complex microbiological situations: multi-operated patients, diagnostic doubt despite iterative sterile culture, long-course antibiotic therapy. We extended a prospective study reported in 2018, to determine whether the test maintained diagnostic value in a larger population, assessing 1) negative (NPV) and positive (PPV) predictive value, and 2) sensitivity and specificity.

HYPOTHESIS

Synovasure™ maintains NPV above 95% in a broader population of microbiologically complex suspected PPI.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Synovasure™'s performance was assessed between October 2015 and October 2019 in 106 patients (112 tests) in complex diagnostic situations: 37 discordant cultures (discordant findings between 2 samples), 65 cases with clinically or biologically suspected infection but iterative sterile culture, 10 emergencies (requiring surgery, precluding antibiotic window, or mechanical failure in suspected infection), including 5 with ongoing antibiotic therapy for infection in another organ. Six tests were repeated in the same patient and same joint at >6 months' interval for strong clinical suspicion of infection. The main endpoint was the MSIS score (MusculoSkeletal Infection Society, 2018).

RESULTS

NPV was 98.8%, PPV 72.4%, sensitivity 95.5% and specificity 91%. Prevalence of infection was 19.6%. Only 1 of the 22 infected patients had negative Synovasure™ tests, compared to 81 of the 84 non-infected patients.

CONCLUSION

Synovasure™ is a reliable novel diagnostic test, contributing mainly to ruling out infection thanks to its strong NPV. The cost imposes sparing use, but medico-economic assessment would be worthwhile.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; prospective of diagnostic performance.

Humeral periosteal spur sign with osteolysis as an early radiographic indicator of low-grade Cutibacterium acnes prosthetic shoulder infection

The early diagnosis of low-grade Cutibacterium acnes prosthetic shoulder joint infection is challenging due to the lack of clinical and laboratory signs. Patients present with atypical symptoms such as stiffness or failure to improve shoulder function. The diagnosis is often delayed with impact on long-term outcomes. We present the case of an 82-year-old man with a surgical site erythema occurring 7 weeks after reverse shoulder arthroplasty associated with a light raise of C reactive protein (20 mg/L). At 9 weeks, radiographs revealed a 'periosteal spur sign' (humeral calcar) and localised adjacent osteolysis. Open surgery showed morphological signs of infection confirmed by growth of C acnes in eight cultures. A 'periosteal spur sign' is a useful early radiographic indicator of low-grade prosthetic joint infection usually occurring with some delay after clinical symptoms. A high clinical index of suspicion is needed to proceed with biopsies and to initiate combined operative and antibacterial treatment.

Effects of different tissue specimen pretreatment methods on microbial culture results in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection

Aims

Microbiological culture is a key element in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, cultures of periprosthetic tissue do not have optimal sensitivity. One of the main reasons for this is that microorganisms are not released from the tissues, either due to biofilm formation or intracellular persistence. This study aimed to optimize tissue pretreatment methods in order to improve detection of microorganisms.

Methods

From December 2017 to September 2019, patients undergoing revision arthroplasty in a single centre due to PJI and aseptic failure (AF) were included, with demographic data and laboratory test results recorded prospectively. Periprosthetic tissue samples were collected intraoperatively and assigned to tissue-mechanical homogenization (T-MH), tissue-manual milling (T-MM), tissue-dithiothreitol (T-DTT) treatment, tissue-sonication (T-S), and tissue-direct culture (T-D). The yield of the microbial cultures was then analyzed.

Results

A total of 46 patients were enrolled, including 28 patients in the PJI group and 18 patients in the AF group. In the PJI group, 23 cases had positive culture results via T-MH, 22 cases via T-DTT, 20 cases via T-S, 15 cases via T-MM, and 13 cases via T-D. Three cases under ongoing antibiotic treatment remained culture-negative. Five tissue samples provided the optimal yield. Any ongoing antibiotic treatment had a relevant influence on culture sensitivity, except for T-DTT.

Conclusion

T-MH had the highest sensitivity. Combining T-MH with T-DTT, which requires no special equipment, may effectively improve bacterial detection in PJI. A total of five periprosthetic tissue biopsies should be sampled in revision arthroplasty for optimal detection of PJI.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(2):96–104.

Reliability of circulating fibrinogen in the diagnosis of prosthesis-related infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Fibrinogen (FIB) has recently been used as a biomarker to diagnose periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), but its reliability is still questionable. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of FIB in the diagnosis of PJI after joint replacement.

Methods

We searched for literatures published in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from the time of database inception to September 2020 and screened the studies according to the inclusion criteria. Then, we calculated the diagnostic parameters of FIB, including the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), area under the curve (AUC), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). In addition, we implemented subgroup analyses to identify the sources of heterogeneity.

Results

Seven studies including 1341 patients were selected in our meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR of FIB for PJI diagnosis were 0.78 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73–0.82), 0.83 (95% CI, 0.81–0.86), 4.60 (95% CI, 3.30–6.42), 0.24 (95% CI, 0.18–0.34), and 20.13 (95% CI, 14.80–27.36), respectively, while the AUC was 0.896.

Conclusion

The present study indicated that FIB was a reliable detection method and might be introduced into the diagnostic criteria for PJI. However, more robust studies are still needed to confirm the current findings, because most of the included studies were retrospective and had small sample sizes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-020-02171-x.

Diagnostic value of the CD 15 focus score in two-stage revision arthroplasty of periprosthetic joint infections : High specificity in diagnosing infect eradication

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study is to use the CD15 focus score (FS) to determine the sensitivity and specificity of bacterial infection persistence in spacer-based two-stage revision arthroplasty.

METHODS

The analysis comprises 112 cases that were subjected to revision due to the presence of infection upon replacement of a joint endoprosthesis. The histopathological data were collected in accordance with the synovial-like interface membrane (SLIM) classification and the CD15-FS and correlated with the microbiological data (MD). The quantifying evaluation of the CD15-FS was performed without knowledge regarding the microbiological data (MD). Correlation with the MD was performed after a 14-day cultivation period.

RESULTS

With a single evaluation (1 focus, field area: 1.2 mm2) with a score value of 42, the CD15-FS showed a sensitivity for the eradication of infections of 0.64 and a specificity of 0.79 (PPV = 0.5; NPV = 0.87). With tenfold evaluation (10 foci, field area: 12 mm2) with a score value of 220, the sensitivity for the eradication was 0.68, the specificity 0.91 (PPV = 0.7; NPV = 0.89). No statistically significant correlation between the score values and the different infectious species could be detected. Based on the MD in 112 cases the rate of infection eradication was 75%. Polymethylmethacrylate-particles (PMMA) were detected in the perispacertissue in 64 cases (58%). No significant correlation could be established between microbiological pathogen detection and the presence of PMMA.

CONCLUSION

In all cases (n = 112), periimplant synovial tissue (SLIM) with variable fibroblastic cellularity, capillary proliferation, leukocytic infiltration, fibrin deposition, new formation of woven bone and detection of PMMA particles was observed. These cases were classified as type IX perispacer synovialis/SLIM: type IX‑A with histopathological infection eradication and type IX‑B with histopathological infection persistence.

Surgical revision strategies for postoperative spinal implant infections (PSII)

Over the last years the number of spine surgeries with instrumentation has grown to an indispensable column in the treatment for different pathologies of the spine. A further increase in the incidence of instrumented spinal surgery is expected throughout the next years. Although the implementation and development of new techniques offer faster and more minimal invasive procedures, shortening surgery time, reducing soft tissue injury and revision due to hardware misplacement, the incidence of postoperative spinal implant infections (PSII) remains high. PSII related complications and revision procedures pose an enormous socioeconomic burden. Therefore, standardized strategies and protocols for treatment of PSII are urgently needed. While in former times hardware exchange or hardware removal was common practise in the field of spine surgery this approach has changed over the last years. Although the evidence from clinical studies in the field of PSII is of limited evidence, critical variables for revision strategies of PSII have been identified. Further, to quickly advance in the field of PSII it is certainly important to extrapolate and learn using data regarding the management from other fields of prosthetic joint infections. This should include clinical as well as experimental work in particular in the context of the biofilm, sonication as well as microbiological concepts. Over the last years, at our institution standardized procedures for diagnostic, surgical as well as antimicrobial treatment have been developed, based on the latest recommendations in peer-reviewed literature and our own data. Here we give an overview about surgical revision strategies for PSII and discuss the key points of our standardized protocol.

Is combining serum interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein a reliable diagnostic tool in periprosthetic joint infections?

BACKGROUND

Because there is no single gold standard method for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), the combination of valuable methods to evaluate infection appears to achieve a better diagnostic result. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of serum interleukin (IL)-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP) for the diagnosis of PJI.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and the Web of Science databases were searched for articles describing PJI diagnosis using serum IL-6 and CRP published between January 1990 and December 2019.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-0.88) for the combined method (serum IL-6 and CRP) in series and parallel approaches, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82-0.90) for IL-6, and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79-0.88) for CRP. The pooled specificity was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.82-0.88) for the combined method, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.79-0.87) for IL-6, and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.79-0.87) for CRP. The combined method had the highest value for the area under the curve (0.9453), followed by IL-6 (0.9237) and CRP (0.9074). Subgroup analyses showed that the sensitivity of the combined method in parallel tests was higher than that in IL-6 or CRP (94% vs. 89% and 84%, respectively). Serial testing of the combined method showed increased specificity compared to a single indicator (96% vs. 83% and 80%).

CONCLUSION

The combination of serum IL-6 and CRP was a reliable tool for the diagnosis of periprosthetic hip and knee infection, demonstrating a better diagnostic accuracy than single marker analysis.

Microbiological diagnosis of intramedullary nailing infection: comparison of bacterial growth between tissue sampling and sonication fluid cultures

BACKGROUND

Intramedullary nailing (IMN) has been frequently indicated to treat long bone open and closed fractures, but IMN infection (IMNI) may have devastating consequences. Sonication has been regarded as an important add-on for microbial identification on a variety of orthopaedic implant-associated infections, but its role in the IMNI is poorly studied. We aim at evaluating the accuracy obtained by conventional peri-implant tissue culture (TC) samples with sonication fluid cultures (SCs) of IMNI.

METHODS

Longitudinal prospective cohort study ongoing since June 2014, which included patients with indication for IMN removal due to any reason. Clinical diagnosis of INMI was defined according to publication addressing fracture-related infections. Minimal of two samples from TC were cultured. SCs followed the protocol previously published. Statistical analysis was performed using McNemar's test for related proportions.

RESULTS

We included 54 patients submitted to IMN retrieval, of whom 47 presenting clinical signs of IMNI. Sensitivity for detecting microorganisms using TC and SC was 89.4% (42/47) and 97.6% (40/41), and specificity was 71.4% (5/7) for both TC and SC (p = 1.00). Positive and negative predictive values for TC and SC were 95.5% (42/44), 95.2% (40/42), 50% (5/10), and 83.3% (5/6), respectively. The most frequent organisms isolated in both TC and SC were Staphylococcus aureus, S. epidermidis, and Enterococcus sp. Polymicrobial infection was diagnosed in 14.8% (8/54) and 25% (12/48) by TC and SC, respectively (p = 0.19).

CONCLUSION

Sonication fluid and tissue samples presented similar accuracy on the diagnosis of IMNI, but SC was advantageous of detecting polymicrobial infection.

Meta-analysis of serum and/or plasma D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic value of D-dimer in detecting periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

METHODS

A systematic search and screening of relevant studies was performed in the databases PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase using the following medical subject headings (MeSH) or keywords: "arthroplasty or joint prosthesis or joint replacement or periprosthetic joint or prosthetic joint", "infection or infectious or infected", and "D-dimer or serum D-dimer or plasma D-dimer or fibrin degradation products". Data were subsequently analysed and processed using Meta-Disc.

RESULTS

Seven studies with 1285 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-0.79), 0.69 (95% CI 0.66-0.72), 3.01 (95% CI 1.84-4.93), 0.32 (95% CI 0.19-0.53), and 10.20 (95% CI 3.63-28.64), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that the use of serum D-dimer had better sensitivity and specificity than plasma D-dimer for the diagnosis of PJI.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum D-dimer was shown to have a better diagnostic value than plasma D-dimer for the diagnosis of PJI. Further research is required for clarification.

Meta-analysis in periprosthetic joint infection: a global bibliometric analysis

Background

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most serious complication of joint replacement surgery. Further comorbidities include bedsore, deep vein thrombosis, reinfection, or even death. An increasing number of researchers are focusing on this challenging complication. The aim of the present study was to estimate global PJI research based on bibliometrics from meta-analysis studies.

Methods

A database search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Relevant studies were assessed using the bibliometric analysis.

Results

A total of 117 articles were included. The most relevant literature on PJI was found on Scopus. China made the highest contributions to global research, followed by the USA and the UK. The institution with the most contributions was the University of Bristol. The journal with the highest number of publications was The Journal of Arthroplasty, whereas the Journal of Clinical Medicine had the shortest acceptance time. Furthermore, the top three frequently used databases were Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane. The most frequent number of authors in meta-analysis studies was four. Most studies focused on the periprosthetic hip and knee. The alpha-defensin diagnostic test, preventive measures on antibiotics use, and risk factors of intra-articular steroid injections were the most popular topic in recent years.

Conclusion

Based on the results of the present study, we found that there was no single database that covered all relevant articles; the optimal method for bibliometric analysis is a combination of databases. The most popular research topics on PJI focused on alpha-defensin, antibiotic use, risk factors of intra-articular steroid injections, and the location of prosthetic hip and knee infection.

Functional recovery after two-stage short-interval revision of chronic periprosthetic knee joint infection

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was the functional recovery analysis of patients treated in two-staged short-interval procedure due to knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the period from January 2015 to December 2018, a two-stage short-interval revision TKA was performed in 35 patients with PJI. Synovial fluid analysis, tissue samples and sonication method were used to diagnose PJI. Active range of motion (AROM) and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score were analysed.

RESULTS

Functional recovery analysis demonstrated higher AROM and HSS score after the revision TKA. Median pre-operative active flexion motion was 80° with full active extension, and median post-operative active flexion was 105° with full active extension. Median HSS score pre-operatively was 22 and post-operatively was 48. Isolated bacteria in both tissue and sonication fluid were S. epidermidis (27%) and other coagulase-negative staphylococci (25%), followed by S. aureus (10%).

CONCLUSION

Two-stage short-interval procedure of chronic knee PJI significantly improved functional status of patients in a short period of time. Thirty three out of 35 patients returned to their everyday activities. Adequate surgical technique and implant selection can lead to satisfactory functional outcome.