Multicenter study of the European Assessment Group for Lysis in the Eye (EAGLE) for the treatment of central retinal artery occlusion: design issues and implications. EAGLE Study report no. 1 : EAGLE Study report no. 1

Acute retinal arterial occlusive disorders

The initial section deals with basic sciences; among the various topics briefly discussed are the anatomical features of ophthalmic, central retinal and cilioretinal arteries which may play a role in acute retinal arterial ischemic disorders. Crucial information required in the management of central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is the length of time the retina can survive following that. An experimental study shows that CRAO for 97min produces no detectable permanent retinal damage but there is a progressive ischemic damage thereafter, and by 4h the retina has suffered irreversible damage. In the clinical section, I discuss at length various controversies on acute retinal arterial ischemic disorders. Classification of acute retinal arterial ischemic disorders: These are of 4 types: CRAO, branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO), cotton wool spots and amaurosis fugax. Both CRAO and BRAO further comprise multiple clinical entities. Contrary to the universal belief, pathogenetically, clinically and for management, CRAO is not one clinical entity but 4 distinct clinical entities - non-arteritic CRAO, non-arteritic CRAO with cilioretinal artery sparing, arteritic CRAO associated with giant cell arteritis (GCA) and transient non-arteritic CRAO. Similarly, BRAO comprises permanent BRAO, transient BRAO and cilioretinal artery occlusion (CLRAO), and the latter further consists of 3 distinct clinical entities - non-arteritic CLRAO alone, non-arteritic CLRAO associated with central retinal vein occlusion and arteritic CLRAO associated with GCA. Understanding these classifications is essential to comprehend fully various aspects of these disorders. Central retinal artery occlusion: The pathogeneses, clinical features and management of the various types of CRAO are discussed in detail. Contrary to the prevalent belief, spontaneous improvement in both visual acuity and visual fields does occur, mainly during the first 7 days. The incidence of spontaneous visual acuity improvement during the first 7 days differs significantly (p<0.001) among the 4 types of CRAO; among them, in eyes with initial visual acuity of counting finger or worse, visual acuity improved, remained stable or deteriorated in non-arteritic CRAO in 22%, 66% and 12% respectively; in non-arteritic CRAO with cilioretinal artery sparing in 67%, 33% and none respectively; and in transient non-arteritic CRAO in 82%, 18% and none respectively. Arteritic CRAO shows no change. Recent studies have shown that administration of local intra-arterial thrombolytic agent not only has no beneficial effect but also can be harmful. Prevalent multiple misconceptions on CRAO are discussed. Branch retinal artery occlusion: Pathogeneses, clinical features and management of various types of BRAO are discussed at length. The natural history of visual acuity outcome shows a final visual acuity of 20/40 or better in 89% of permanent BRAO cases, 100% of transient BRAO and 100% of non-arteritic CLRAO alone. Cotton wools spots: These are common, non-specific acute focal retinal ischemic lesions, seen in many retinopathies. Their pathogenesis and clinical features are discussed in detail. Amaurosis fugax: Its pathogenesis, clinical features and management are described.

Study of the Efficacy of Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Central Retinal Artery Occlusion

Rationale

Central retinal artery occlusion is a stroke of the eye caused by a blockage of its main blood supply by platelet-fibrin clot. Systemic thrombolysis has been successful in restoring perfusion to ischaemic tissue by fibrin-platelet clot lysis in ischaemic stroke and myocardial infarction. Several open-label studies have demonstrated efficacy of thrombolysis in the treatment of central retinal artery occlusion, with up to 60–70% of treated subjects experiencing an improvement in visual acuity. Most of these are given intraarterially, which is an invasive procedure and not widely applicable to all treatment centres. An alternative is the intravenous infusion of tissue plasminogen activator using existing stroke thrombolysis protocols. A systematic review of all observational studies of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute central retinal artery occlusion showed that 48·5% of subjects had a four line or more visual acuity improvement with an acceptable rate of haemorrhagic complications, creating the equipoise necessary to conduct a randomised controlled trial.

Aim

To determine the efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis in acute treatment of central retinal artery occlusion.

Design

A phase II, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised controlled trial comparing intravenous tissue plasminogen activator at 0·9 mg/kg to placebo (normal saline) 100 ml in a 1 : 1 block randomisation.

Study outcome

The primary outcome measure is an improvement of three lines or more on the Snellen visual acuity chart, which signifies a doubling of the visual angle.

Intra-arterial thrombolysis for central retinal artery occlusion: two cases report

Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) causes severe visual loss in affected eye and vision does not recover in more than 90% of the patients. It is believed that it occurs by occlusion of the central retinal artery with small emboli from atherosclerotic plaque of internal cerebral artery. Retina is a part of the brain, thus basically CRAO is corresponding to acute occlusion of intracerebral artery and retinal ischemia is to cerebral stroke. Therefore, intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) has been considered as a treatment method in CRAO. Recently, we treated 2 patients diagnosed as CRAO and could achieve complete recanalization on fundus fluorescein angiogram with IAT. Of them, one recovered visual acuity to 20/25. We report our 2 CRAO cases treated with IAT and discuss technical aspects for IAT and management of patient. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first Korean report of IAT for CRAO.

Perioperative visual loss: what do we know, what can we do?

Perioperative visual loss (POVL), a rare, but devastating complication, can follow non-ocular surgery. Highest rates of visual loss are with cardiac and spine surgery. The main causes of visual loss after non-ocular surgery are retinal vascular occlusion and ischaemic optic neuropathy. This review updates readers on the incidence, suspected risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment of POVL due to these conditions.

Occurrence and predictors of futile recanalization following endovascular treatment among patients with acute ischemic stroke: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Although recanalization is the goal of thrombolysis, it is well recognized that it fails to improve outcome of acute stroke in a subset of patients. Our aim was to assess the rate of and factors associated with "futile recanalization," defined by absence of clinical benefit from recanalization, following endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 6 studies of acute ischemic stroke treated with mechanical and/or pharmacologic endovascular treatment were analyzed. "Futile recanalization" was defined by the occurrence of unfavorable outcome (mRS score of > or = 3 at 1-3 months) despite complete angiographic recanalization (Qureshi grade 0 or TIMI grade 3).

RESULTS

Complete recanalization was observed in 96 of 270 patients treated with IA thrombolysis. Futile recanalization was observed in 47 (49%). In univariate analysis, patients with futile recanalization were older (73 +/- 11 versus 58 +/- 15 years, P < .0001) and had higher median initial NIHSS scores (19 versus 14, P < .0001), more frequent BA occlusion (17% versus 4%, P = .049), less frequent MCA occlusion (53% versus 76%, P = .032), and a nonsignificantly higher rate of symptomatic hemorrhagic complications (2% versus 9%, P = .2). In logistic regression analysis, futile recanalization was positively associated with age > 70 years (OR, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.9-10.5; P = .0008) and initial NIHSS score 10-19 (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.7-8.4; P = .001), and initial NIHSS score > or = 20 (OR, 64.4; 95% CI, 28.8-144; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Futile recanalization is a relatively common occurrence following endovascular treatment, particularly among elderly patients and those with severe neurologic deficits.

Sonothrombolysis for intraocular fibrin formation in an animal model

Vascular diseases such as diabetic retinopathy or retinal arterial occlusion are always associated with retinal and/or choroidal vasculopathy and intravascular thrombosis is commonly found. The ultrasound (US) therapy is a recently developed technique to accelerate fibrinolysis and it is being applied to some clinical fields. The present study was to observe the effects of extraocular US exposure on intraocular fibrin, which is a deteriorating factor in various ocular diseases. Tubes containing human blood (2 mL) in the following groups were irradiated with US; US alone, US with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), tPA alone, and saline (control). Fibrinolysis was quantified by measuring D-dimer after 2h. In rat eyes, intracameral fibrin (fibrin formation in the anterior chamber of the eye) was induced by YAG-laser-induced iris bleeding. Then, eyes in the following groups were irradiated with US; US alone, subconjunctival tPA alone, US and subconjunctival tPA, control. Intracameral fibrin was scored on day 3 (3+ maximum to 0). The temperatures of rat eyes were measured by infrared thermography. Histologic evaluation was also performed. D-dimer was increased by US with statistical significance (p <0.05) or tPA (p <0.01). D-dimer in US with tPA group was significantly higher than either US alone or tPA alone group (p <0.01). In rat eyes, the average intracameral fibrin score on day 3 was 1.4 in control group and 1.2 in subconjunctival tPA alone group; however, it decreased significantly in the US alone group (0.75; p <0.05, vs. control), US and subconjunctival tPA group (0.71; p <0.01, vs. control). The temperature was less than 34 degrees C after US exposure. No histologic damage was observed. US irradiation from outside accelerated intracameral fibrinolysis without causing apparent tissue damage. This noninvasive method might have therapeutic value for intraocular fibrin.

Thrombolytic therapy in central retinal artery occlusion: cutting edge therapy, standard of care therapy, or impractical therapy?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Numerous therapeutic options have been suggested for the treatment of central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) such as ocular massage, anterior chamber paracentesis, physical exercise, and medication-induced reduction of intraocular pressure. Because of the lack of a proven effective treatment for CRAO, there has been a strong effort to develop alternative therapies. Recently, thrombolytic therapy has been suggested as a viable therapy for CRAO. The aim of this review is to provide an update on the progress of thrombolytic therapy for CRAO.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although there is no consensus on a standardized treatment regimen for CRAO, emerging evidence suggests that thrombolytic therapy may be effective if administered promptly. Despite the benefit of thrombolytic therapy, on the basis of the results of case reports and case series, randomized controlled studies are necessary to ultimately prove the effectiveness of the treatment.

SUMMARY

Thrombolytic therapy has yet to be validated as an effective treatment of CRAO. The execution of randomized, controlled trials is greatly needed to establish whether thrombolytic therapy can be considered standard of care therapy for CRAO.

Interventions for acute non-arteritic central retinal artery occlusion

BACKGROUND

Acute central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) occurs as a sudden interruption of the blood supply to the retina and results in an almost complete loss of vision in the affected eye. There is no generally agreed treatment regimen although a number of therapeutic interventions have been proposed.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to examine the effects of treatments used for acute non-arteritic CRAO.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2008), MEDLINE (January 1966 to September 2008), EMBASE (January 1980 to September 2008) and the reference lists of relevant papers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) only in which one treatment aimed to re-establish blood supply to the retina in people with acute CRAO was compared to another treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed the search results for relevant trials. Discrepancies were resolved by discussion.

MAIN RESULTS

We found two RCTs that met our inclusion criteria.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The included studies in this review were small and from single centres. Neither study was completely clear about it's method of treatment allocation. One study described the use of pentoxifylline tablets (three 600 mg tablets daily) and the other the use of enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) combined with haemodilution. Both studies indicated improved retinal perfusion in the non-control group but neither showed an improvement in vision. Large, well-designed RCTs are still required to establish the most effective treatment for acute CRAO. These studies should be looking at factors important to the patient i.e. improved vision with acceptable risk/side-effects.

Intravenous thrombolysis with low-dose recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in central retinal artery occlusion

PURPOSE

To evaluate the beneficial effect of intravenous thrombolysis aiming at rapid restoration of blood flow during the early hours of a central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO).

DESIGN

Interventional case series.

METHODS

In the present study, we prospectively evaluated the visual outcome after thrombolytic treatment with low-dose (50 mg) rt-PA (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator) and concomitant intravenous heparinization in patients with acute CRAO, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) < or = 20/100, and onset of symptoms within 12 hours prior to treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients (28 eyes) were included in this study. Final visual acuity was improved three or more lines in nine eyes (32%), stable in 18 (64%), and worse in one eye. Time to treatment < or = 6.5 hours was associated with a better gain of lines of vision (P = .004). Seven of 17 eyes (41%) that received thrombolytic treatment within the first 6.5 hours achieved a final BCVA > or = 20/50, compared to none in the subgroup of patients with onset to treatment >6.5 hours (P = .023). We observed no serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that thrombolytic treatment with intravenous low-dose rt-PA is of value for an improved visual recovery in patients with acute CRAO, if administered within the first 6.5 hours after the onset of symptoms.

Retinal vascular occlusions: an interdisciplinary challenge

INTRODUCTION

Retinal venous and arterial occlusions are common causes of visual loss. Depending on the location and extent, symptoms may vary from very discrete impairments to complete loss of sight.

METHODS

Selective literature review including the authors' own research data with a particular focus on interdisciplinary aspects.

RESULTS

Retinal vascular occlusions are not a uniform entity. Rather, they reflect the whole breadth of vascular disease. In arterial occlusion, embolic phenomena and Horton's arteritis should be excluded, in addition to local ophthalmological investigations. In retinal venous occlusion, optimal treatment of arterial hypertension is universally useful, while investigations for thrombophilia are useful in patients under 50 years of age. The results of intravitreal injection of corticosteroids and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors appear encouraging in treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.

DISCUSSION

While local diagnostic and therapeutic measures are performed by ophthalmologists, there is an important role for interdisciplinary cooperation in the investigation and systemic treatment of these events.

Local intraarterial fibrinolysis administered in aliquots for the treatment of central retinal artery occlusion: the Johns Hopkins Hospital experience

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Central retinal artery occlusion results in acute visual loss with poor spontaneous recovery. Current standard therapies do not alter the natural history of disease. Several open-label clinical studies using continuous infusion of thrombolytic agents have suggested that local intraarterial fibrinolysis (LIF) is efficacious in the treatment of central retinal artery occlusion. The aim is to compare the visual outcome in patients with acute central retinal artery occlusion of presumed thromboembolic etiology treated with LIF administered in aliquots with that of patients treated with standard therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center, nonrandomized interventional study of consecutive patients with acute central retinal artery occlusion from July 1999 to July 2006.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients received LIF and 21 received standard therapy. Seventy-six percent of subjects in the LIF group had a visual acuity improvement of one line or more compared with 33% in the standard therapy group (P=0.012, Fisher exact). Multivariate logistic regression controlling for gender, history of prior stroke/transient ischemic attack, and history of hypercholesterolemia showed that patients who received tissue plasminogen activator were 36 times more likely to have improvement in visual acuity (P=0.0001) after adjusting for these covariates. Post hoc analysis showed that patients who received tissue plasminogen activator were 13 times more likely to have improvement in visual acuity of 3 lines or more (P=0.03) and 4.9 times more likely to have a final visual acuity of 20/200 or better (P=0.04). Two groin hematomas were documented in the LIF group. No ischemic strokes, retinal or intracerebral hemorrhages were documented.

CONCLUSIONS

LIF administered in aliquots is associated with an improvement in visual acuity compared with standard therapy and has few side effects.

Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis for Central Retinal Artery Occlusion in United States: Nationwide In-Patient Survey 2001-2003

BACKGROUND

Intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) has been used as a treatment modality for central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO). However, national estimates of such practice and associated outcomes are not available. We performed this study to determine the frequency and outcomes of thrombolysis among adult patients hospitalized in United States (US) for CRAO.

METHODS

We determined the rates, hospital outcomes, and hospital charges incurred for patients with CRAO treated with thrombolysis using Nationwide Inpatient Survey (NIS) and compared them with patients treated without thrombolysis. NIS is the largest all-payer inpatient care database in the US approximating a 20-percent stratified sample of US community hospitals.

RESULTS

There were 1379 admissions for primary diagnosis of CRAO in 2001-2003. IAT was used in 27(1.9%) of the patients with CRAO. There was no in-hospital mortality or intracranial hemorrhage reported among any patient with CRAO treated with thrombolysis. All patients treated with IAT were discharged home. IAT was exclusively used in urban-teaching hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

There is potential of benefit from IAT in CRAO, which is only offered in certain centers. Clinical trials are needed to demonstrate this beneficial effect.

Thrombolysis for Central Retinal Artery Occlusion

Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) frequently causes severe and irreversible visual loss. For many years, various conservative treatments have been proposed for acute CRAO, but their efficacy remains unproven. Over the past 20 years, CRAO has also been treated with thrombolytic agents administered intravenously or intra-arterially. However, all thrombolytic studies are retrospective and uncontrolled, so that the benefit of this treatment remains uncertain. A prospective controlled clinical trial is ongoing in Europe and should provide more reliable information. Even if this trial demonstrates a benefit, thrombolytic treatment is unlikely to become widespread in the management of CRAO unless it can be deployed quickly after the event.

Topical heparin: new observations

Topical effects of heparins on the skin need deeper investigations. The lack of evidence is mainly due to the lack of large investments in this field. Three main local actions of heparin on the skin can be defined: (a) the anticoagulant action, (b) the microcirculatory-modulatory action determining important control of the microcirculation in case of excessive vasoconstriction or vasodilatation, and (c) the 'facilitatory action' on skin permeability allowing other drugs to diffuse better and faster into the skin (producing a therapeutic effect). These aspects have to be evaluated more extensively in both experimental and clinical conditions. Recent experimental studies demonstrate these effects of locally applied heparin. Therefore, key questions on local heparin administration such as skin penetration and the action on the local thrombi have promising answers. These observations suggest important clinical applications for local liposomal heparin. Both the potentials of local applications of heparin, particularly with new formulations, and some new aspects in the management of superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) can focus on locally applied heparin. SVT is an important clinical condition considering its frequency and the potentially heavy use of local heparin in this clinical problem. Results from new studies and observations presented in this issue of Angiology could be a window for suggesting new significant clinical applications and therapeutic solutions.

Chirurgische Therapie retinaler Venenverschlüsse

The range of therapeutic options for the treatment of retinal vein occlusions has been decisively extended by three new surgical methods: radial optic neurotomy (RON) and retinal endovascular lysis (REVL) for central retinal vein occlusion, and arteriovenous dissection (AVD/sheathotomy) for branch retinal vein occlusion. None of those methods has been tested in randomised studies meeting the requirements of evidence-based medicine. It is therefore difficult to assess the relative values of the individual procedures and determine in what precise circumstances each is indicated. The difficulties are compounded further by the use of these techniques in association with new and promising intravitreally injected drugs (e.g. steroids and angioinhibitors), which makes it even more difficult to assess the real efficacy of the surgical methods. In this paper we discuss the three different surgical methods and try to evaluate their clinical benefit.

Lysetherapie vs. konservative Therapie

In the prospective, randomised and multicenter EAGLE study, the therapeutic efficiency of local intra-arterial fibrinolysis (LIF) versus conservative treatment is being tested in patients with an acute central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO). The most important inclusion criteria are: (1) age between 18-75 years, (2) CRAO not older than 20 h, and (3) visual acuity <0.32. The primary study endpoint is the visual acuity before and 1 month after therapy. The study was started in 2002. To August 2006, 63 of the 200 required patients have been included in the study at 17 medical centers in Germany, Switzerland and Austria.