Nontraumatic death in joggers. A series of 30 patients at autopsy

Causes of sudden death in competitive athletes

Cardiovascular diseases responsible for sudden unexpected death in highly conditioned athletes are largely related to the age of the patient. In most young competitive athletes (less than 35 years of age) sudden death is due to congenital cardiovascular disease. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy appears to be the most common cause of such deaths, accounting for about half of the sudden deaths in young athletes. Other cardiovascular abnormalities that appear to be less frequent but important causes of sudden death in young athletes include congenital coronary artery anomalies, ruptured aorta (due to cystic medial necrosis), idiopathic left ventricular hypertrophy and coronary artery atherosclerosis. Diseases that appear to be very uncommon causes of sudden death include myocarditis, mitral valve prolapse, aortic valve stenosis and sarcoidosis. Cardiovascular disease in young athletes is usually unsuspected during life, and most athletes who die suddenly have experienced no cardiac symptoms. In only about 25% of those competitive athletes who die suddenly is underlying cardiovascular disease detected or suspected before participation and rarely is the correct clinical diagnosis made. In contrast, in older athletes (greater than or equal to 35 years of age) sudden death is usually due to coronary artery disease, and rarely results from congenital heart disease.

Levels of serum sex hormones and risk factors for coronary heart disease in exercise-trained men

On the basis of previous findings, it has been hypothesized that hyperestrogenemia may be the major predisposing factor for coronary heart disease and that an elevation in the estradiol-to-testosterone ratio, or a closely related hormonal alteration, may cause the expression of risk factors for coronary heart disease. The present study was carried out to investigate whether exercise training, which has been reported to reduce risk factors for coronary heart disease, affects the serum sex hormone levels. The serum sex hormone levels, established risk factors for coronary heart disease, and physical fitness were measured in 10 men who had undergone at least six months of intensive exercise training and in 10 sedentary men of similar age. Despite evidence for a strikingly higher level of physical fitness and a lower level of risk factors in the trained group, no significant difference in mean serum estradiol level was found. Nor did three subjects from the sedentary group show a decrease in estradiol level after three to four months of exercise training. The mean estradiol-to-testosterone ratio, however, was significantly lower in the trained group and might account for the lower level of risk factors in that group. If the hypothesis is correct, exercise training may decrease established risk factors for coronary heart disease without decreasing the risk of coronary heart disease.

High Blood Pressure in the Competitive Athlete: Guidelines and Recommendations

In brief: Since short-term adverse effects of hypertension in competitive athletes have not been reported, it seems reasonable to permit most athletes with mild to moderate hypertension to participate in organized sports, Mild hypertension may be managed by restricting sodium intake, controlling weight, and using relaxation techniques. Some sympathetic inhibiting agents are preferable as first-step drugs because they lower arterial pressure at rest and during exercise. Occasionally small-dose diuretics may be added, usually with potassium supplements. Long-term observation of hypertensive athletes is needed to determine the presence or absence of late harmful effects of increased arterial pressure and exercise.

Physical activity levels and coronary heart disease. Analysis of epidemiologic and supporting studies

Coronary heart disease, the primary health problem in western life, is caused by the interaction of multiple factors. Absolute proof of the contributing role of physical inactivity is not possible owing to the complexity of the CHD problem and the infeasibility of a definitive clinical trial because of logistical and economic constraints. Despite limitations, existing epidemiologic studies strongly suggest, but fall short of proving, the concept that habitual physical exercise offers partial protection against primary or secondary events of CHD and associated mortality. However, experimental data support this hypothesis and provide evidence of possible mechanisms responsible for the protection. The available epidemiologic data also suggest that physical inactivity is probably not as potent an individual risk factor as elevated serum cholesterol levels, hypertension, and cigarette smoking, and that the protective effects of exercise may be overwhelmed by high levels of these major risk factors. On the other hand, there is some evidence that exercise may attenuate other risk factors both directly and through associated weight reduction. Epidemiologic studies also suggest a dose response relationship between physical activity and rates of CHD. About 2000 kcal per week of moderate intensity, dynamic, endurance-type of exercise (such as walking or jogging about 20 miles per week) or at least one hour of intermittent hard physical labor are required to obtain the optimal effect of exercise on coronary heart disease rates. Experimental studies suggest that this amount of exercise should provide sufficient stimulus to favorably alter blood HDL cholesterol levels and perhaps other CHD risk factors, especially if there is an accompanying reduction in weight. Possible mechanisms for the protective effects of exercise against CHD are illustrated in Figure 1. Insistence on final experimental proof prior to prudent medical practice or public health policy on physical inactivity or other coronary risk factors indicates a lack of understanding of the nature of scientific proof and evidence required for health actions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Exercise and heart disease. Epidemiology of the "exercise hypothesis"

The "exercise hypothesis" states that exercise protects against coronary heart disease. Reviewed herein is the epidemiologic evidence for and against the "exercise hypothesis." The weight of evidence supports the view that exercisers have a lower risk of coronary disease, but that vigorous exercise cannot always prevent progression of coronary atherosclerosis and does increase the risk of sudden death in persons with advanced coronary atherosclerosis. It is concluded that the "exercise hypothesis" is plausible, even likely, but still unproved.