Immunohistochemical mapping of angiotensin type 2 (AT2) receptors in rat brain

Heterogeneity of angiotensin type 2 (AT2) receptors

Evidence continues to accumulate that strengthens the proposal of heterogeneity within both the AT1 and the AT2 receptor subtypes. Pharmacologic, biochemical and immunological studies of AT2 receptors expressed in N1E-115 cells strengthen the hypothesis of AT2 receptor heterogeneity. However, it is important to reassess these studies, especially in terms of how these results correlate with other reports of AT2 receptor heterogeneity. For example, AT2 receptor immunoreactivity was absent in some neuronal regions which have previously been proposed to express the AT2 receptor subtype. In particular, AT2 receptor staining was not seen in the inferior olive, a region which is known to express a high density of AT2 receptors. Upon first examination, these results were somewhat troubling. However, when compared with earlier reports, these results should not have been unexpected. For instance, Tsutsumi and Saaverdra previously have shown that AT2 receptors in the locus coeruleus are sensitive to the actions of guanine nucleotides, while AT2 receptors in the inferior olive are insensitive (21). These antisera were raised against a population of AT2 receptors which are sensitive to GTP gamma S and therefore, the lack of AT2 receptor staining in the inferior olive, as well as the presence of AT2 receptor immunoreactivity in the locus coeruleus, confirms and extends these earlier reports. In addition the AT2 receptors expressed in the locus coeruleus have been shown to be functionally distinct from AT2 receptors in the inferior olive. In this regard, Ang II has been shown to depress glutamate-induced EPSPs in the locus coeruleus, an effect which is mediated through the AT2 receptor (19). Conversely, AT2 receptors have been shown to increase the firing rate of neurons in the inferior olive (20). Collectively, these results would predict that staining should be absent in the inferior olive using these AT2-directed antisera. Indeed, in view of these earlier physiological and pharmacological studies, the presence of AT2 receptor immunoreactivity in the inferior olive would have been surprising. The most convincing example of AT2 receptor heterogeneity is the characterization of AT2 receptors present in N1E-115 cells. Separation of solubilized N1E-115 membranes by heparin-Sepharose chromatography generates two populations of AT2 receptors which are pharmacologically and biochemically distinct. In particular, CGP42112A was approximately 2 orders of magnitude more selective for Peak III AT2 receptors than was PD123319. Binding activity of Peak I and Peak III AT2 receptor populations also differed in their responses to GTP gamma S and DTT treatment. Lastly, the AT2-directed antisera, raised against the Peak I population of AT2 receptors, were not able to immunodetect the Peak III population of AT2 receptors in immunoblot analysis, or immunoprecipiatate AT2 binding activity from Peak III material. Pharmacological, biochemical and immunological analysis of the AT2 receptor clone isolated from N1E-115 cells revealed that it has the identical characteristics or properties of the Peak III receptor. The AT2 receptor isolated from N1E-115 cells exhibited a similar pharmacology as the Peak III AT2 receptor, in that CGP42112A was more effective at displacing 125I-Ang II binding activity than was PD123319. The AT2 receptor clone was also shown to be insensitive to the actions of GTP gamma S, as well as demonstrated increased binding activity in the presence of DTT, identical to the Peak III AT2 receptor. Lastly, immunoblot analysis of membranes prepared from COS-1 cells transfected with the AT2 receptor cDNA from N1E-115 cells did not demonstrate any immune-specific bands with the AT2-directed antisera. Characterization of an AT2 receptor cDNA isolated from N1E-115 cells reveals that this clone is identical to the Peak III type of AT2 receptor.

Comparative expression of vasopressin and angiotensin type-1 receptor mRNA in rat hypothalamic nuclei: a double in situ hybridization study

Angiotensin II (Ang) injected intracerebroventricularly stimulates neurohypophyseal vasopressin (AVP) release into the peripheral circulation. As we have shown previously, central actions of Ang II in the rat forebrain are mediated by the AT1A receptor subtype. In the present paper, we attempted to clarify the cellular localization of the AT1A receptor mRNA in the hypothalamic paraventricular (PVN) and supraoptic (SON) nuclei, in order to reappraise the conflicting data on the nature of the angiotensin II receptor involved in Ang induced vasopressin release. For this purpose, double in situ hybridization was performed using a radioactive AT1A receptor riboprobe and a digoxygenin labeled AVP oligoprobe, and immunohistochemical localization of the glial marker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) on the same brain slice. The results show neuronal expression of AT1A receptor mRNA mainly in dorsal and medial parvocellular parts of the PVN, its localization in some magnocellular PVN neurons and the absence of its expression in AVP producing neurons either in the PVN or in the SON. Thus, while indirect evidence indicates the involvement of the AT1A receptor subtype in the regulation of CRH and oxytocin release, the stimulation of vasopressinergic neurons is likely due to indirect mechanisms, or to a yet unknown type of angiotensin receptor.

The angiotensin type 1 and type 2 receptor families. Siblings or cousins?

The diverse actions of angiotensin II (AngII) are mediated by cell surface receptors. Molecular cloning techniques have identified two distinct subtypes of AngII receptors referred to as AT1 and AT2. It is now well accepted that multiple forms of the AT1 receptor exist, but similar diversity of the AT2 subtype has not been conclusively demonstrated. Nonetheless, several converging lines of evidence do suggest that multiple AT2 receptors may be present in brain and cultured neuron-like cells lines. For instance, some AT2 receptors are regulated by guanine nucleotides and sulfhydryl-reducing agents, whereas others are insensitive. AT2 receptor populations also exhibit differing pharmacological profiles particularly with respect to their affinity for peptidic and non-peptidic ligands. Moreover, a recently developed anti-AT2 polyclonal antisera reveals a unique pattern of immunohistochemical staining in brain and it does not immunoreact with the recently cloned AT2 receptor. Collectively, these results support the hypothesis of multiple AT2 receptors at least within the CNS. Future studies should reveal whether these putative AT2 receptor subtypes result from unique genes or cell-specific post-translational modifications of a single gene product.