A placebo-controlled trial of intravenous and oral disopyramide for prevention of neurally mediated syncope induced by head-up tilt

Pharmacological treatment of reflex syncope

Patient education, identification of possible triggers of syncope and reassurance are a central feature of the management of patients with reflex syncope. Patients should be advised as to the importance of adequate hydration and taught physical countermaneuvers to enhance cardiac venous return. These maneuvers are sufficient for most patients, however, for a small number of patients who continue to have recurrent syncopal events, pharmacological intervention may be considered. Volume expansion can be enhanced with salt and fludrocortisone. Agents from diverse pharmacological classes have been used to attenuate the reflex response, enhance vasoconstriction and attenuate vagal outflow. Alpha adrenoreceptor agonists, anticholinergic agents, theophylline, beta adrenoreceptor antagonists, serotonin reuptake inhibitors and disopyramide are the most widely studied. None of these agents has shown a consistent therapeutic benefit in clinical trials.

Current Management of Syncope: Treatment Alternatives

Syncope, defined as a transient loss of consciousness and postural tone with spontaneous recovery and no neurologic sequelae, is among one of the most common causes of consultation with a physician. The diagnostic workup is complex but can be simplified if focused on the underlying condition. Prognosis is highly dependent on the presence or absence of structural heart disease, primarily the presence of cardiomyopathy regardless of etiology, particularly if the left ventricular (LV) function is less than 35%. The diagnostic approach to the patient with recurrent syncope and no structural heart disease is targeted to rule out neurally mediated causes. This approach usually includes a tilt table test (ie, head-up tilt), carotid sinus massage in patients older than 55 years, and an adenosine challenge test in patients who remain with unexplained syncope. Unexplained syncope in patients with reduced LV function (< 35%) may be potentially life-threatening. Infrequent causes of syncope should be sought in younger patients with a family history of sudden cardiac death. Channelopathies such as the long QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia are among this variety. Therapy should address the potential mechanism of syncope. In neurally mediated causes, restoration of orthostatic tolerance, primarily by increasing volume during orthostatic stress, is recommended. Physiologic countermaneuvers and increase in salt and water intake are usually the initial therapy. With syncope in patients with an LV dysfunction (< 35%), an ICD is frequently recommended after ruling out common causes of syncope. Syncope in the elderly is usually multifactorial and therapy should include reassessment of multiple medications, which can promote neurally mediated syncope as well as searching for bradycardic causes. Empiric pacing may be used in this complex group of patients.

Response to treatment during medium-term follow-up in a series of patients with neurocardiogenic syncope

BACKGROUND

Syncope is a common symptom that has different recurrence ratios. We hypothesized that an individualized treatment regimen including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic measures considering kind of neurocardiogenic syncope (NCS) and basal characteristics of each patient could allow optimized therapy to avoid recurrences.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study to evaluate performance of diverse accepted treatments for NCS. Each patient received specific treatment including general measures such as an increase in salt and water intake, tilt training, specific pharmacologic treatment according to head-up tilt table test (HUTT) result, and patient basal blood pressure and heart rate measurements.

RESULTS

We followed a group of 127 patients during a main period of 20.8 +/- 9 months (range, 6-38 months). Mean age was 47.8 +/- 19.2 years and 66.9% were females. We had six (4.7%) patients with recurrence of symptoms 4 +/- 0.9 months after diagnostic HUTT. Medications used were atenolol in 20 patients, pindolol in 17, dysopiramide in 50, and fluoxetine in 25. Two patients received fludrocortisone. Tilt training was not indicated initially for patients with recurrences but was indicated later; to date, these patients have not experienced further episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Increase in water and salt intake, as well as tilt training, showed great value in prevention of syncope recurrences in this specific set of patients. Pharmacologic treatment has an important role, but there is no single medication associated with significant improvement in symptom control.

Drug treatment of orthostatic hypotension because of autonomic failure or neurocardiogenic syncope

Orthostatic hypotension either because of autonomic failure or neurocardiogenic syncope can be very incapacitating and should be treated accordingly. Drug therapy is frequently needed to alleviate orthostatic symptoms. The physiopathological basis of neurocardiogenic syncope and of autonomic failure is completely different and their treatment should be distinct. In the past 5 years, many randomized, placebo-controlled trials have shed light on the efficacy of specific pressor drugs. In patients with orthostatic hypotension because of autonomic failure, alpha-adrenoceptor agonists, and midodrine in particular, have been shown to increase standing blood pressure and decrease orthostatic symptoms. Other drugs such as octreotide, indomethacin or ergotamine have also been shown to elevate standing blood pressure and/or orthostatic tolerance. Fludrocortisone is a well known and frequently used pressor drug but randomized controlled studies are needed to measure its efficacy. In patients with orthostatic hypotension associated with neurocardiogenic syncope, clinical trials have demonstrated that beta-blockers, especially beta(1)-selective agents without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity such as atenolol, midodrine and paroxetine can decrease recurrence of syncope. Treatment algorithms, such as those presented in this review, should always be interpreted in the light of individual patient characteristics. Many of the drugs used for orthostatic hypotension have multiple indications and contraindications that should influence therapeutic decisions. Little is known about the effectiveness and tolerability of specific combinations of pressor drugs. Consequently, sound clinical judgment and close follow-up of patients should always guide combination therapy.

Efficacy of Orthostatic Self‐Training in Medically Refractory Neurocardiogenic Syncope

BACKGROUND

Orthostatic self-training is effective in the prevention of neurocardiogenic syncope, though the success of this method in drug refractory patients has not been reported. STUDY OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: This study examined the effectiveness of orthostatic self-training in 15 patients with head-up tilt testing (HUT)-inducible neurocardiogenic syncope, who were intolerant of, or refractory to standard drug therapy. They were enrolled in a home orthostatic self-training program for up to 30 min/session, twice daily. Head-up tilt testing was repeated within 4 weeks after onset of the training program, using the same protocol as at baseline. Orthostatic self-training was continued once daily, for up to 30 min, for a mean follow-up period of 11 months, in the drug-free state.

RESULTS

Syncope was not reinducible by follow-up HUT, and spontaneous syncope occurred in no patient during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Home orthostatic self-training, up to 30 min once daily following an initial twice daily program, was highly effective in the suppression of recurrent neurocardiogenic syncope in patients intolerant of, or refractory to standard drug therapy.

Randomized clinical trials of neurally mediated syncope

Evidence for therapy of neurally mediated syncope is generally weak. Many drugs have been used for the treatment of vasovagal syncope (beta-blockers, disopyramide, scopolamine, clonidine, theophylline, fludrocortisone, ephedrine, dihydroergotamine, etilefrine, midodrine, clonidine, serotonin reuptake inhibitors, enalapril). In general, although the results have been satisfactory in uncontrolled trials or short-term controlled trials, the majority of long-term placebo-controlled prospective trials have not been able to show a benefit of the active drug over placebo. Only two well-designed double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trials have been performed-one for etilefrine and the other for atenolol-and both were unable to show a superiority of the active drug versus placebo. Four randomized clinical trials of pacing therapy-three positive and one negative-have been performed in patients affected by vasovagal syncope. The relationship between carotid sinus hypersensitivity and spontaneous, otherwise unexplained, syncope has been demonstrated. Cardiac pacing appears to be beneficial in carotid sinus syndrome; its efficacy has been demonstrated by two randomized controlled trials and confirmed by several pre-post comparative studies, one controlled trial, and one prospective observational study. There is evidence and general agreement that cardiac pacing is useful in patients with cardioinhibitory or mixed carotid sinus syndrome. Usefulness of the treatment is less well established and divergence of opinion exists with regard to cardiac pacing in patients with cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope. The evidence fails to support the efficacy of beta-blocking drugs. As yet there are insufficient data to support the use of any other pharmacologic therapy for vasovagal syncope.

Neurocardiogenic syncope in children : current concepts in diagnosis and management

A wide variety of pharmacologic agents are currently used for the prevention of recurrent neurocardiogenic syncope in children and adolescents. Significant advances in the understanding of this syncopal disorder have occurred in the past decade, and the list of medications recommended has changed, reflecting the evolving understanding of the pathophysiology and development of agents with enhanced efficacy and fewer adverse effects. Clinicians have few randomized controlled trials available to guide their decisions about treating neurocardiogenic syncope, and even fewer when it comes to medications targeting the pediatric population. At the present time, beta-adrenergic receptor blockers, fludrocortisone, and also specific serotonin reuptake inhibitors and midodrine, appear to be favored treatment options. Ideally, specific therapy would be tailored to specific pathophysiologic mechanisms. Unfortunately, at present, specific treatments based on those abnormalities have not been identified.

Syncope and orthostatic intolerance

Syncope and orthostatic intolerance remain common and significant clinical problems with many undocumented, misdiagnosed, or cryptogenic cases. Careful clinical assessment and application of advancing laboratory support can further improve diagnosis and treatment. Despite the depth of existing research into these common problems, many underlying mechanisms remain unproven.

Effects of orthostatic self-training on head-up tilt testing for the prevention of tilt-induced neurocardiogenic syncope: comparison of pharmacological therapy

Although a wide variety of medical treatments for neurocardiogenic syncope have been proposed, therapy has largely been emperic based on the mechanisms commonly believed to lead to neurocardiogenic fainting. To determine the utility and efficacy of drug therapy and an orthostatic self-training program in the prevention of tilt-induced neurocardiogenic syncope, we investigated 43 consecutive patients who had shown syncope and were induced by head-up tilt test reproducibly, with either traditional medical treatments or orthostatic self-training at home. The initial 19 of 43 patients were treated with either oral propranolol or disopyramide therapies. The remaining 24 patients were treated with an orthostatic self-training program alone. Effects of these therapies on head-up tilt test were reevaluated in all patients. Propranolol prevented syncope in only six (32%) and disopyramide in five (26%) of the 19 patients. There was no significant difference in the effectiveness between them. Syncope was prevented in nine (47%) patients with either propanolol or disopyramide therapy alone, while in the remaining 10 patients it was not. On the other hand, orthostatic self-training program prevented syncope in 22 (92%) of 24 patients. We concluded that orthostatic self-training program is far more effective than traditional drug therapies. Orthostatic self-training is an effective, safe and well accepted therapy in the prevention of tilt-induced neurocardiogenic syncope.

Syncope: investigation and treatment

Syncope is a common condition that can be both disabling and expensive to treat. Although investigative modalities are sometimes required, a diagnosis can often be made with a good history and physical exam. Recent reports have identified specific historic features that are more suggestive of cardiac syncope as compared with vasovagal syncope and seizures. Advances in ambulatory electrocardiography (in particular the implantable loop recorder) have proven invaluable in both difficult-to-diagnose syncope, and in advancing our knowledge of its mechanisms. When clear dysrhythmias are manifest, appropriate therapies are self-evident. However, recurrent vasovagal syncope continues to be a condition that can be difficult to treat. Fortunately, there are well-conducted trials of both pharmacologic therapies (b-blockers, alpha agonists, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) and nonpharmacologic treatments (orthostatic physical training and dual-chamber pacemakers) that should provide more guidance in the near future.

Midodrine in neurally mediated syncope: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study

Neurally mediated syncope is the most frequent cause of syncope in patients without structural heart disease. Its most common trigger is a reduction in venous return to the heart due to excessive venous pooling in the legs. We conducted a double-blind, randomized, crossover trial to investigate the efficacy of midodrine, a selective alpha-1 adrenergic agonist that decreases venous capacitance, in preventing neurally mediated syncope triggered by passive head-up tilt. Twelve patients with history of recurrent neurally mediated syncope, which was reproduced during head-up tilt, were randomized to receive a nonpressor dose of midodrine (5mg) or placebo on day 1 and the opposite on day 3. One hour after drug or placebo administration, patients underwent 60-degree head-up tilt lasting 40 minutes (unless hypotension or bradycardia developed first). In the supine position, midodrine produced no significant change in blood pressure or heart rate. The responses to head-up tilt were significantly different on the midodrine and the placebo day: on the placebo day, 67% (8/12) of the subjects suffered neurally mediated syncope, whereas only 17% (2/12) of the subjects developed neurally mediated syncope on the midodrine day (p < 0.02). These results indicate that midodrine significantly improves orthostatic tolerance during head-up tilt in patients with recurrent neurally mediated syncope.

Vasovagal syncope: a prospective, randomized, crossover evaluation of the effect of propranolol, nadolol and placebo on syncope recurrence and patients' well-being

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the relative therapeutic efficacy of propranolol, nadolol and placebo in recurrent vasovagal syncope (VVS).

BACKGROUND

Central and peripheral mechanisms have been implicated in the pathogenesis of VVS. Propranolol, nadolol and placebo have different sites of action on central and/or peripheral mechanisms. It has not yet been clarified whether one of the aforementioned treatments is more efficient than the others in reducing clinical episodes and exerting a beneficial effect on patients' well-being.

METHODS

We studied 30 consecutive patients with recurrent VVS and a positive head-up tilt test. All were serially and randomly assigned to propranolol, nadolol or placebo. Therapy with each drug lasted three months. On the day of drug crossover, patients reported the total number of syncopal and presyncopal attacks during the previous period. They also gave a general assessment of their quality of life, taking into account: 1) symptom recurrence; 2) drug side effects; and 3) their personal well-being during therapy (scale 0 to 4: 0 = very bad/discontinuation; 1 = bad; 2 = good; 3 = very good; 4 = excellent). At the end of the nine-month follow-up period, they reported whether they preferred a specific treatment over the others.

RESULTS

Spontaneous syncopal and presyncopal episode recurrence during each three-month follow-up period was reduced by all drugs tested (analysis of variance [ANOVA]: chi-square = 67.4, p < 0.0001 for syncopal attacks; chi-square = 60.1, p < 0.0001 for presyncopal attacks) No differences were observed in the recurrence of syncope and presyncope among the three drugs. All drugs improved the patients' well-being (ANOVA: chi-square = 61.9, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Propranolol, nadolol and placebo are equally effective treatments in VVS, as demonstrated by a reduction in the recurrence of syncope and presyncope, as well as an improvement in the patients' well-being.

Strategy for the management of vasovagal syncope

The disorders of autonomic control associated with orthostatic intolerance are a diverse group of syndromes that can result in syncope and near-syncope. A basic understanding of the pathophysiology of these disorders is essential to diagnosis and proper treatment. It is especially important to recognise the difference between the effect of prolonged upright posture on a failing autonomic nervous system (a hyposensitive or dysautonomic response) and the vasovagal response (which may be a hypersensitive response). Vasovagal syncope is the most common abnormal response to upright posture and occurs in all age groups. The advent of tilt table testing has helped define a population with an objective finding during provocative testing that has enabled researchers to study the mechanism of vasovagal syncope and to evaluate the efficacy of treatments. In most patients, vasovagal syncope occurs infrequently and only under exceptional circumstances and treatment is not needed. Treatment may be indicated in patients with recurrent syncope or with syncope that has been associated with physical injury or potential occupational hazard. Based on study data, patients with vasovagal syncope can now be risk stratified into a high-risk group likely to have recurrent syncope and a low-risk group. Many patients with vasovagal syncope can be effectively treated with education, reassurance and a simple increase in dietary salt and fluid intake. In others, treatment involves removal or avoidance of agents that predispose to hypotension or dehydration. However, when these measures fail to prevent the recurrence of symptoms, pharmacological therapy is usually recommended. Although many pharmacological agents have been proposed and/or demonstrated to be effective based on nonrandomised clinical trials, there is a remarkable absence of data from large prospective clinical trials. Data from randomised placebo-controlled studies support the efficacy of beta-blockers, midodrine, serotonin reuptake inhibitors and ACE inhibitors. There is also considerable clinical experience and a consensus suggesting that fludrocortisone is effective. Encouraging new data suggest that a programme involving tilt training can effectively prevent vasovagal syncope. For patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope that is refractory to these treatments, implantation of a permanent pacemaker with specialised sensing/pacing algorithms appears to be effective. A number of larger clinical trials are underway which should help further define the efficacy of a number of different treatments for vasovagal syncope.

[Vasovagal syncope in pediatric patients: a medium-term follow-up analysis]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Little information is available on the evolution of pediatric patients with vasovagal syncope. We therefore aimed to assess the medium-term clinical outcome of children evaluated by tilt testing for syncope of unknown origin.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Fifty-one children under 17 years of age who had undergone tilt testing were identified from a data base and studied prospectively. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to estimate syncope-free survival, its predictors, and the relative risks of several patient subgroups.

RESULTS

Forty-seven (92%) of the children were followed for a mean 21 9 months. The rate of recurrence of syncope was considerably lower than that estimated during history taking before the tilt test (19% vs 47%; p < 0.01). Although the low rate made it difficult to identify predictors, several potential predictors emerged from the multivariate analysis. Only the history of more than one syncope before the tilt test (vs. isolated syncope) was found to have independent predictive value (p = 0.04). The cumulative probability of recurrence projected for a period of 38 months was 66.2% (SEM = 16.5%) for children with more than one syncope before testing vs. 0% for those who had experienced only one. No other events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The medium-term prognosis seems to be good for children with vasovagal syncope of unknown origin, given the low rate of recurrence, regardless of the results of tilt testing. The only predictor of recurrent syncope was pretest history, such that children with only one syncope before testing experience no recurrence and those with one or more episodes are estimated to have an increasingly higher likelihood of recurrence. These data may be useful for the recommending tilt testing and for planning therapy for children with vasovagal syncope.

Diagnosis and treatment of neurally mediated syncope

BACKGROUND

Syncope is caused by a severe but reversible reduction in blood flow to the brain stem neurons responsible for supporting consciousness (reticular activating system). Neurally mediated syncope, also referred to as vasovagal or reflex syncope, is the most frequent cause of loss of consciousness in apparently normal subjects.

REVIEW SUMMARY

Neurally mediated syncope is believed to be a reflex response with afferent, central, and efferent pathways. Characteristic autonomic changes in neurally mediated syncope are an increase in parasympathetic efferent activity causing bradycardia and a reduction in sympathetic vasoconstrictor outflow causing vasodilatation. Premonitory symptoms, such as nausea, diaphoresis, abdominal discomfort, and blurred vision, are caused by autonomic activation and are distinguishing features of neurally mediated syncope. Neurally mediated syncope frequently has a characteristic trigger, although this may not be apparent. Testing orthostatic tolerance during passive head-up tilt is the best available diagnostic procedure to evaluate patients with syncope in whom a cardiac cause has been excluded. In many cases, once the diagnosis of neurally mediated syncope is confirmed, it may suffice to reassure the patient and teach him to avoid known triggers and to recognize and act upon early warning symptoms. Because subjects with neurally mediated syncope may potentially be sodium depleted, increasing salt intake can be beneficial in improving their orthostatic intolerance.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurally mediated syncope is the most common form of syncope in healthy adults. The best diagnostic tools are the clinical history and passive head-up tilt. The best treatment strategies are the avoidance of triggering factors as well as intravascular volume expansion.

Neurocardiogenic syncope: aetiology and management

Neurocardiogenic syncope is the most common cause of syncope presenting in the outpatient setting. It is usually encountered among individuals without an underlying heart disease, but not uncommonly participates in the syncope mechanism of patients with an obstructive or an arrhythmic cardiac cause for syncope as well. The vasovagal event is caused by a transient profound hypotensive reaction most commonly associated with inappropriate bradycardia resulting from activation of a complex autonomic reflex. The pathophysiology of neurocardiogenic syncope has been elucidated by tilt table testing, a noninvasive and well-tolerated method for reproducing the event in susceptible individuals. Although the majority of people with vasovagal fainting need no specific treatment, treatment is required for those presenting with problematic features such as frequent events accompanied by trauma or accidents, and occasionally by a severe cardioinhibitory pattern response. A number of different drugs have been proposed to favourably act on different aspects of the neurocardiogenic reflex but only a few randomised, placebo-controlled, drug-specific trials are currently available. Alternatively, cardiac pacing has also been introduced for patients who have symptoms that are drug-refractory or for those with a severe cardioinhibitory hypotensive response. The selection of the appropriate treatment plan should be individualised after consideration of patient history, clinical characteristics and preference, results of the baseline tilting study, and the existing evidence from the few randomised, controlled studies performed so far.

Syncope

Successful treatment of patients with syncope depends on the accuracy of the diagnosis, because syncope is a symptom, not a disease; diagnosis of the cause for syncope therefore creates a blueprint for treatment. Most experienced practitioners can diagnose the cause of syncope for less than half of their patients. Excessive and repeat testing is expensive and may not improve the chance of a correct diagnosis. Patient history is the key to the diagnosis. Treatment may vary from a lifestyle change to open heart surgery. The great challenge of treating patients with syncope is to provide cost-effective, safe therapy to those with a benign course and still provide needed treatment for those whose syncope is life threatening.

Medical therapy of neurocardiogenic syncope

Neurocardiogenic syncope, alternatively called vasovagal, vasodepressor, or neurally mediated syncope, is a clinical syndrome faced by many clinicians. Its pathophysiology is complicated and not fully understood. Multiple pharmacologic therapies have been evaluated, with no clear ideal agent. Decisions regarding tilt-table testing, selection of pharmacotherapy, and assessment of drug efficacy are not straightforward. This article attempts to assess these issues.

Autonomic control of the venous system in health and disease: effects of drugs

The venous system contains approximately 70% of the blood volume. The sympathetic nervous system is by far the most important vasopressor system in the control of venous capacitance. The baroreflex system responds to acute hypotension by concurrently increasing sympathetic tone to resistance, as well as capacitance vessels, to increase blood pressure and venous return, respectively. Studies in experimental animals have shown that interference of sympathetic activity by an alpha1- or alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist or a ganglionic blocker reduces mean circulatory filling pressure and venous resistance and increases unstressed volume. An alpha1- or alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist, on the other hand, increases mean circulatory filling pressure and venous resistance and reduces unstressed volume. In humans, drugs that interfere with sympathetic tone can cause the pooling of blood in limb as well as splanchnic veins; the reduction of cardiac output; and orthostatic intolerance. Other perturbations that can cause postural hypotension include autonomic failure, as in dysautonomia, diabetes mellitus, and vasovagal syncope; increased venous compliance, as in hemodialysis; and reduced blood volume, as with space flight and prolonged bed rest. Several alpha-adrenoceptor agonists are used to increase venous return in orthostatic intolerance; however, there is insufficient data to show that these drugs are more efficacious than placebo. Clearly, more basic science and clinical studies are needed to increase our knowledge and understanding of the venous system.

Lack of efficacy of atenolol for the prevention of neurally mediated syncope in a highly symptomatic population: a prospective, double-blind, randomized and placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of atenolol for the long-term management of patients with vasovagal syncope. The primary hypothesis was that atenolol is not superior to placebo for the treatment of vasovagal syncope.

BACKGROUND

There is no definitive well-controlled analysis of the efficacy of beta-adrenergic blocking agents in patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope.

METHODS

This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Fifty patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope were included (at least two episodes in the last year). A baseline tilt test was performed. Twenty patients (40%) had a positive tilt test. Intravenous atenolol prevented a second positive tilt in five patients. The patients were randomized to receive either atenolol or a placebo (26 patients atenolol 50 mg/day, 24 patients placebo). The follow-up procedure lasted one year. The primary end point of the study was the time to first recurrence of syncope.

RESULTS

In the intention-to-treat analysis, the group treated with atenolol had a similar number of patients with recurrent syncopal episodes as the placebo group. The Kaplan-Meier actuarial estimates of time to first syncopal recurrence showed that the probability of remaining free of syncope drops similarly in both groups and that there was no statistical difference between both curves (patients treated with atenolol vs. the placebo) with a log-rank test p value of 0.4517.

CONCLUSIONS

The recurrence of neurocardiogenic syncope in highly symptomatic patients treated with atenolol is similar to that of patients treated with placebo.

Continuous monitoring of an endocardial index of myocardial contractility during head-up tilt test

BACKGROUND

Previous studies suggest that vigorous myocardial contractions stimulate ventricular mechanoreceptors and lead to vasovagal syncope. We studied an endocardial index of myocardial contractility during the head-up tilt test in vasovagal patients and control patients, and we evaluated the effect of negative inotropic drugs on myocardial contractility and tilt test outcome.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We investigated 19 patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope and positive tilt test (group 1) and 11 patients with no syncope and negative tilt test (group 2). Myocardial contractility was continuously measured during a tilt test (60 degrees ) through a microaccelerometer incorporated in the tip of a right ventricular electrode to sense left ventricular contractility. Patients in groups 1 and 2 were evaluated during an unmedicated tilt test, and patients in group 1 were reevaluated during a tilt test with infusion of esmolol (n = 10) or disopyramide (n = 9). During the unmedicated test, patients in group 1 exhibited a significant increase in myocardial contractility immediately on postural change (P <.05), unlike patients in group 2. Patients in group 1 also had a further increase in myocardial contractility before the end of tilt (P <.01). With drug administration, the changes in supine myocardial contractility were nonsignificant and were not related with the outcome of the tilt test (P <.05).

CONCLUSIONS

An increase in myocardial contractility is detected by the sensor during the tilt test. The changes induced by the drugs on supine myocardial contractility are minor and not related with the outcome of the head-up tilt test.

Tilt training: a treatment for malignant and recurrent neurocardiogenic syncope

The treatment of neurocardiogenic syncope is insufficient in many cases. We hypothesized that the repeated exposure of the cardiovascular system to orthostatic stress could have a therapeutic effect on the regulation of cardiovascular reflex mechanisms. We have started a program of tilt training for heavily symptomatic patients. After hospital admission, patients were tilted daily (60-degree inclination), until syncope, or until a maximum of 45-90 minutes. The patients were instructed to continue a program of daily tilt training at home: two 30-minute sessions of upright standing against a vertical wall. No medication was prescribed. A total of 260 tilt table sessions were performed in 42 patients. The first tilt test was positive after 21 +/- 13 minutes. The syncope was cardioinhibitory in 14 cases, vasodepressor in 19, mixed in 9. At the time of hospital discharge, 41 patients could support 45 minutes of head-up tilting. After a mean follow-up time of 15.1 (SD 7.8) months, 36 patients remained completely free of syncope. Syncope still occurred in one patient and presyncope in four patients. One patient died from an extensive myocardial infarction. The abnormal autonomic reflex activity of neurocardiogenic syncope can be remedied by a program of continued tilt training without the administration of drugs. This new treatment has proven to be effective for the vasodepressor and the cardioinhibitory type of syncope.

Driving safety among patients with neurocardiogenic (vasovagal) syncope

Neurocardiogenic syncope is one of the most common causes of syncope. However, the important issue of driving related injury due to syncope in this population is not well defined. Risk of injury due to syncope while driving and driving behavior was evaluated in 155 consecutive patients (92 women and 63 men; mean age 49 +/- 19 years) with history of syncope in whom hypotension and syncope or presyncope could be provoked during head-up tilt testing. Patients with syncope and positive head-up tilt table test were treated with pharmacological therapy. All participants were asked to fill out a detailed questionnaire regarding any driving related injuries and their driving behavior before tilt table testing and during follow-up. Prior to head-up tilt testing two patients had syncope while driving, and one of these patients had syncope related injury during driving. The mean duration of syncopal episodes was 50 +/- 14 months (range 12-72 months). Of the 155 patients, 52 (34%) had no warning prior to syncope, while 103 (6%) had warning symptoms such as dizziness prior to their clinical syncope. Following a diagnosis of neurocardiogenic syncope established by head-up tilt testing, six patients stopped driving on their own. During a median follow-up of 22 months recurrent syncope occurred in five (3.2%) patients. No patient had syncope or injury during driving. In conclusion, syncope and injury while driving in patients with neurocardiogenic syncope is rare. The precise mechanism of this is unclear but may be related to posture during driving. Consensus among the medical community will be needed to provide specific guidelines in these patients.

Usefulness of a tilt training program for the prevention of refractory neurocardiogenic syncope in adolescents: A controlled study

BACKGROUND

Recurrent syncope represents a debilitating disorder and quality of life deteriorates as a function of recurrence of symptoms. Although the administration of beta-blockers, vasoconstrictors, fludrocortisone, and serotonin reuptake inhibitors may be helpful in preventing episodes, many patients are intolerant of or respond poorly to these agents. Orthostatic training has been reported to be effective in preventing refractory syncope. Thus, to determine whether a tilt training program could prevent symptoms in adolescents, the following controlled study was undertaken.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty-seven consecutive adolescents (18 male and 29 female, mean age 16.0+/-2.2 years) with recurrent syncope and positive head-up tilt test refractory to previous traditional therapies were distributed between 2 groups, depending on their consent (24 patients) or refusal (controls, 23 patients) to enter the program. Orthostatic training was started, in the presence of a family member, with a series of 5 in-hospital sessions. The 24 patients and their relatives were then instructed to perform the tilt training at home by standing against a wall twice a day for a planned duration of up to 40 minutes, depending on the in-hospital orthostatic tolerance. Head-up tilt response was reevaluated after 1 month, and the clinical effect was noted over a mean follow-up of 18. 2+/-5.3 months (range 15 to 23); 26.1% of patients in the control group and 95.8% of patients in the training group became tilt-negative (P<0.0001). Spontaneous syncope was observed in 56.5% versus 0% in the control and training group, respectively (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Orthostatic training was found to significantly improve symptoms of adolescents with neurocardiogenic syncope unresponsive to or intolerant of traditional medications. Twice-a-day training sessions of 40 minutes were well accepted by patients.

Pharmacologic approaches to therapy for vasovagal syncope

Vasovagal syncope is a common disorder of autonomic cardiovascular regulation. Many pharmacologic agents have been proposed as effective in the management of this condition based on nonrandomized clinical trials. Notably, only 3 agents--atenolol, midodrine, and paroxetine--have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of vasovagal syncope in at least 1 prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Other therapies commonly used in treating syncope include increased salt and fluid intake and fludrocortisone. In this review, we provide a summary of currently available data that support or question the use of various pharmacologic agents for treatment of vasovagal syncope.

Putting it together: a new treatment algorithm for vasovagal syncope and related disorders

The consensus process that culminated in this symposium established an algorithm to guide the diagnosis and treatment of patients with vasovagal syncope and related disorders. In some patients, the hemodynamic response to standing may identify an abnormality-postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome or orthostatic hypotension-that can often be treated without further testing. When the response to standing is normal, tilt-table testing may be useful in making the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope and guiding treatment. In some patients, however, the diagnosis is clear from the history, and tilt-table testing may not be necessary. Not all patients with vasovagal syncope need to be treated, and many can be treated effectively with education, reassurance, and a simple increase in dietary salt. In evaluating the results of tilt-table testing, an important consideration is the distinction between vasovagal syncope and the dysautonomic response to tilt characterized by a gradual and progressive decrease in blood pressure that leads to syncope. Current practice patterns suggest that beta blockers, fludrocortisone, and midodrine, are commonly used to treat patients with vasovagal syncope, and patients with the dysautonomic response are generally treated with fludrocortisone and midodrine. Permanent pacing with specialized pacing algorithms should be considered for patients with frequent vasovagal syncope that is refractory to medical therapy. The guidelines proposed here are an amalgam of clinical experience, expert opinion, and research evidence; however, they do not suggest a standard of care for all patients.

Pharmacotherapy of neurally mediated syncope

A wide variety of pharmacological agents are currently used for prevention of recurrent neurally mediated syncope, especially the vasovagal faint. None, however, have unequivocally proven long-term effectiveness based on adequate randomized clinical trials. At the present time, beta-adrenergic receptor blockade, along with agents that increase central volume (eg, fludrocortisone, electrolyte-containing beverages), appear to be favored treatment options. The antiarrhythmic agent disopyramide and various serotonin reuptake blockers have also been reported to be beneficial. Finally, vasoconstrictor agents such as midodrine offer promise and remain the subject of clinical study. Ultimately, though, detailed study of the pathophysiology of these syncopal disorders and more aggressive pursuit of carefully designed placebo-controlled treatment studies are essential if pharmacological prevention of recurrent neurally mediated syncope is to be placed on a firm foundation.

Neurally Mediated Syncope

Syncope is a common problem in medical practice. Of the various types of syncope, the neurally mediated syncopal syndromes (of which vasovagal syncope is the most common) predominate. In most cases, neurally mediated syncope is a solitary event that can be managed with only reassurance, but certain patients (those with multiple recurrences or those who have been injured as a result of syncope) need further investigation and therapy. Dietary and lifestyle changes are crucial and often overlooked aspects of therapy that may be sufficient to control symptoms. Pharmacologic therapy, which usually starts with beta-blockers or fludrocortisone, can also be effective. Finally, certain patients may continue to have recurrences despite the use of both nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapy. It was recently demonstrated that permanent pacing may be effective in preventing recurrent syncopal episodes in some of these patients.

Management of vasovagal syncope

Vasovagal syncope is a common disorder of autonomic cardiovascular regulation that can be very disabling and result in a significant level of psychosocial and physical limitations. The optimal approach to treatment of patients with vasovagal syncope remains uncertain. Although many different types of treatment have been proposed and appear effective based largely on small nonrandomized studies and clinical series, there is a remarkable absence of data from large prospective clinical trials. However, based on currently available data, the pharmacologic agents most likely to be effective in the treatment of patients with vasovagal syncope include beta blockers, fludrocortisone, and alpha-adrenergic agonists. In this article, we provide a summary of the various therapeutic options that have been proposed for vasovagal syncope and review the clinical studies that form the basis of present therapy for this relatively common entity.

Effect of etilefrine in preventing syncopal recurrence in patients with vasovagal syncope: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The Vasovagal Syncope International Study

BACKGROUND

Etilefrine is an alpha-agonist agent with a potent vasoconstrictor effect, which is potentially useful in preventing vasovagal syncope by reducing venous pooling and/or by counteracting reflex arteriolar vasodilatation. The present multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of this drug for the long-term management of patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In the 20 participating centers, 126 patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope (at least 3 episodes in the last 2 years) and a positive baseline head-up tilt response were randomly assigned to placebo (63 patients) or etilefrine at a dosage of 75 mg/d (63 patients) and were followed up for 1 year or until syncope recurred. The primary end-point of the study was the first recurrence of syncope. There were no differences between the 2 study groups in the patients' baseline characteristics. During follow-up, the group treated with etilefrine had a similar incidence of first syncopal recurrence to that of placebo group both in the intention-to-treat analysis (24% versus 24%) and in on- treatment analysis (26% versus 24%). Moreover, the median time to the first syncopal recurrence did not significantly differ between the 2 study groups (106 days in the etilefrine arm and 112 days in the placebo arm).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral etilefrine is not superior to placebo in preventing spontaneous episodes of vasovagal syncope. Randomized controlled studies are essential to assess the real usefulness of any proposed therapy for patients with vasovagal syncope.

"Rate-drop response" cardiac pacing for vasovagal syncope. Rate-Drop Response Investigators Group

Recent reports suggest that cardiac pacing incorporating a rate-drop response algorithm is associated with a reduction in the frequency of syncopal episodes in patients with apparent cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope. The detection portion of the algorithm employs a programmable heart rate change-time duration "window" to both identify abrupt cardiac slowing suggestive of an imminent vasovagal event and trigger "high rate" pacing. The purpose of this study was to develop recommendations for programming the rate-drop response algorithm. Pacemaker programming, symptom status, and drug therapy were assessed retrospectively in 24 patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope of sufficient severity to warrant consideration of pacemaker treatment. In the 53 +/- 19 months prior to pacing, patients had experienced an approximate syncope burden of 1.2 events/month. During follow-up of 192 +/- 160 days, syncope recurred in 4 patients (approximate syncope burden, 0.3 events/month, p < 0.05 vs. pre-pacing), and pre-syncope in 5 patients. In these patients, rate-drop response parameters were initially set based on electrocardiographic and/or tilt-table recordings, and were re-programmed at least once in 14 (58%) individuals. A 20 beat/min window height (top rate minus bottom rate), a window width of 10 beats (61% of patients), and 2 or 3 confirmation beats (79% of patients) appeared to be appropriate in most patients. Treatment intervention rate was set to > 100 beats/min in 89% of patients, with a duration of 1 to 2 min in 79%. In conclusion, a narrow range of rate-drop response parameter settings appeared to be effective for most individuals in this group of highly symptomatic patients.

Resumption of motor vehicle operation in vasovagal fainters

This study surveyed current practice patterns with respect to the manner by which cardiac arrhythmia specialists advise patients with vasovagal syncope regarding resumption of motor vehicle operation. Among 66 physician-respondents from 9 countries, 98% indicated that they rely on tilt-table testing to establish a diagnosis, and, if an effective treatment is found based on serial tilt-table testing, they recommend a 6- to 7-week symptom-free waiting period before advising return to driving.

Using a tilt table to evaluate syncope

Upright tilt testing is commonly used in the evaluation of patients with syncope to provoke hypotension and/or bradycardia in the laboratory. The most common type of response is provocation of neurally mediated syndrome (vasovagal syncope). The American College of Cardiology Expert Consensus has proposed indications for tilt testing. The most common indication is recurrent syncope of unexplained cause. Upright tilt testing methods have not been standardized. The most common protocols in this country use a tilt angle of 60-80 degrees and use isoproterenol infusion after a period of drug-free tilt testing. The sensitivity of upright tilt testing is estimated to be 67-83%, and the specificity is between 75 and 100%. The reproducibility of the test has been variable. In patients with unexplained syncope, positive responses are found to be 50% without the use of isoproterenol and 64% with the use of isoproterenol. Many different treatments have been used. At this time, there is no consensus regarding the most effective treatment. Beta-blockers and fludrocortisone plus salt are the most commonly used drugs. Pacemakers have been used, but their role is ill-defined at this time.

Prospective evaluation of a two-step therapeutic strategy in neurocardiogenic syncope: midodrine as second line treatment in patients refractory to beta-blockers

Pharmacological therapy of neurocardiogenic syncope is often limited by the relatively low response rate to such treatment. In particular, response to beta-blocker treatment has been reported to average 50%. Therefore, a two-step protocol, with metoprolol being the drug of first choice, was developed and prospectively evaluated in consecutive patients with a history of repeated syncopal attacks and a positive tilt table test indicative of neurocardiogenic syncope. Patients not responding to the beta-blocker were switched to the alpha-adrenoceptoragonist midodrine. Acute drug efficacy was assessed by repeated tilt table testing. The incidence of syncope recurrence rate was determined during a 7-month follow-up. In 16 of 30 (53%) patients, metoprolol was primarily effective; this was also the case in 7 of 11 patients receiving midodrine. Thus, the overall efficacy rate could be increased to 77% by the treatment protocol (P = 0.009, as compared to beta-blocker treatment alone). During follow-up, only 1 of 27 patients (4%) had a syncopal event. Thus, the two-step treatment protocol presented in this study proved to be safe and to improve significantly patients clinical symptoms, as well as results of repeated tilt table testing as compared to beta-blocker treatment alone.

Usefulness of pindolol in neurocardiogenic syncope

We prospectively studied the efficacy of pindolol, a beta-adrenergic blocker with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA), for the prevention of syncope recurrences in 31 patients with recurrent neurocardiogenic syncope. Pindolol proved to be an effective treatment, even in patients who had previously failed treatment with conventional beta blockers, suggesting a clinical benefit from addition of ISA to beta blockade in this setting.

DDD pacing with rate drop response function versus DDI with rate hysteresis pacing for cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of cardiac pacing in preventing vasovagal syncope remains controversial. However, DDI pacing with rate hysteresis has been reported to prevent the recurrence of cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope in up to 35% of affected subjects and to reduce the overall incidence of syncopal episodes in the others. Recently, DDD pacing with a new promising rate drop response function (Medtronic Thera-I model 7960) has become available in clinical practice.

AIM OF THE STUDY

The aim of the present open trial was to test the effectiveness of this new pacing modality in patients with cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope.

STUDY POPULATION AND METHODS

The study population included 20 patients (12 males and 8 females; mean age 61.1 +/- 14 yrs) with recurrent syncope (mean number of prior episode = 6.8, range 5-11) and cardioinhibitory responses during two head-up tilt tests: the first diagnostic and the second during drug therapy with either beta-blockade or etilephrine. The study patients were randomized to receive either DDI pacing with rate hysteresis (8 patients) or DDD pacing with rate drop response function (11 patients). The head-up tilt test performed 1 month after pacemaker implantation was positive in 3 of 12 patients (25%) with DDD pacing with rate drop response function and in 5 of 8 patients (62.5%) with DDI pacing with rate hysteresis. The mean duration of follow-up was 17.7 +/- 7.4 months. During follow-up no patients with a DDD pacemaker with rate drop response function had syncope, while 3 of 8 patients with a DDI pacemaker with rate hysteresis had recurrence of syncope (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that DDD pacing with rate drop response function is effective in cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope and may be preferable to DDI pacing with rate hysteresis.

Long-term effects of pharmacological therapy for vasovagal syncope on the basis of reproducibility during head-up tilt testing

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of long-term pharmacological therapy selected on the basis of a head-up tilt test (HUT) in patients in whom reproducibility of the HUT response was demonstrable in the initial study. The HUT (80 degrees upright) was performed for 15 min with or without an infusion of isoproterenol (0.01-0.03 microgram/kg per min) in 54 patients with recurrent unexplained syncope. When vasovagal syncope was induced (positive response), the HUT was repeated to examine the test reproducibility. Vasovagal syncope was induced in 24 patients during HUT alone, and in 30 patients during the HUT with isoproterenol. Acute reproducibility was observed in 49/54 (91%) patients. In the tilt-positive patients, HUT was repeated after an intravenous administration of propranolol (0.1 mg/kg) or disopyramide (1 mg/kg) (acute test). Propranolol proved effective in 21 (80%) of 26 patients, and disopyramide in 13 (56%) of 23 patients. Thereafter, evaluation was done on the long-term clinical follow-up of the pharmacological intervention selected on the basis of the acute test in the 34 patients in whom the HUT could not induce vasovagal syncope after the oral administration of the pharmacological agent (propranolol 60 mg/day, disopyramide 300 mg/day). Thirty-two of 34 patients (94%) did not develop syncopal attacks during a 44 +/- 12-month period. Thus, in patients with unexplained syncope, HUT appears to have a high degree of acute reproducibility, and the acute drug response guided by HUT may be used to develop an effective long-term pharmacological therapy.

Neurally mediated hypotension and chronic fatigue syndrome

A substantial body of clinical evidence now supports an association between various forms of hypotension and both idiopathic chronic fatigue and the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Patients with CFS have a high prevalence of neurally mediated hypotension, and open treatment of this autonomic dysfunction has been associated with improvements in CFS symptoms. Randomized trials are now in progress to evaluate the efficacy of treatments directed at neurally mediated hypotension in those with CFS patients, and the results of these trials should help guide more basic inquiries into the mechanisms of orthostatic intolerance in affected individuals.

Usefulness of intravenous metoprolol to prevent syncope induced by head-up tilt

Intravenous metoprolol was found to be significantly more effective than placebo in preventing head-up tilt-table induced neurally mediated syncope. The reproducibility of acute tilt-table testing is only 63% and suggests caution in the interpretation of acute drug testing during tilt-table studies.

Abnormality of alpha-adrenergic vascular response in patients with neurally mediated syncope

Although diagnosis of neurally mediated syncope (NMS) using the head-up tilt (HUT) test has been established, the precise etiologic mechanism of NMS is still obscure. Previously, we reported the contribution of impaired alpha-adrenergic vascular response to syncope in patients with various arrhythmias. This study evaluates alpha-adrenergic vascular response in 21 NMS patients with syncope and a positive HUT test (80 degrees, 30 minutes, and low-dose isoproterenol, NMS group, mean age 31 +/- 14 years) and 21 control subjects (C group, 33 +/- 14 years) who had no evidence of syncope and no structural heart disease. After 30 minutes in a recumbent position, pharmacologic total autonomic blockade was attained using atropine and propranolol. Thereafter, increased systolic blood pressure with 0.4 microg/kg/min phenylephrine (designated as deltaBPphenyl) and decreased systolic blood pressure with 0.5 microg/kg/30 seconds of phentolamine (designated as deltaBPphent) were measured as indexes of alpha-adrenergic vascular sensitivity and activity, respectively. DeltaBPphenyl in the NMS group (70.0 +/- 37) was significantly less than that in C group (107 +/- 38, p <0.005). DeltaBPphent was significantly greater in the NMS group than in the C group (33.5 +/- 10 vs 21.0 +/- 14, p <0.005). Thus, decreased alpha-adrenergic vascular sensitivity and elevated alpha-adrenergic vascular tone were observed in patients with NMS. Although it is not known whether the mechanism causing NMS can be attributed to this abnormal alpha-adrenergic vascular response, the abnormality could at least contribute to augmenting the symptoms of NMS.

Midodrine: a role in the management of neurocardiogenic syncope

OBJECTIVE

To determine the benefit of midodrine, an alpha agonist, on symptom frequency and haemodynamic responses during head up tilt in patients with neurocardiogenic syncope.

SETTING

Cardiovascular investigation unit (a secondary and tertiary referral centre for the investigation and management of syncope).

PATIENTS

16 outpatients (mean (SD) age 56 (18) years; five men) with frequent hypotensive symptoms (more than two syncopal episodes and fewer than 20 symptom free days per month), and reproducible syncope with glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) during head up tilt.

DESIGN AND INTERVENTION

Randomised double blind placebo controlled study. Patients were randomised to receive either placebo or midodrine for one month. Symptom events were recorded during each study month. At the end of each study month patients completed a quality of life scoring scale (Short Form 36) and a global assessment of therapeutic response. They received GTN with head up tilt for measurement of heart rate (electrocardiography), phasic blood pressure (digital photoplethysmography), and thoracic fluid index (transthoracic impedance plethysmography) during symptom provocation.

RESULTS

Patients administered midodrine had an average of 7.3 more symptom free days than those who received placebo (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.6 to 9; p < 0.0001). Eleven patients reported a positive therapeutic response with midodrine (p = 0.002). All domains of quality of life showed improvement with midodrine, in particular physical function (8.1; 95% CI 3.7 to 12.2), energy and vitality (14.6; 95% CI 7.3 to 22.1), and change in health status (22.2; 95% CI 11 to 33.4). Fourteen patients who were given placebo had tilt induced syncope compared with six given midodrine (p = 0.01). Baseline supine systolic blood pressure was higher and heart rate lower in patients who received midodrine than in those who were given placebo (p < 0.05). A lower thoracic fluid index in patients administered midodrine indicates increased venous return when supine and during head up tilt. There were no serious adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Midodrine had a conspicuous beneficial effect on symptom frequency, symptoms during head up tilt, and quality of life. Midodrine is recommended for the treatment of neurocardiogenic syncope in patients with frequent symptoms.

Head-upright tilt table testing. A safe and easy way to assess neurocardiogenic syncope

Head-upright tilt table testing has emerged as an exciting technique for evaluating episodes of autonomically mediated syncope. It may be performed using gravity alone as the provocative stimulus or with the addition of isoproterenol. The classic neurocardiogenic response to the test is a sudden drop in blood pressure followed by a decrease in heart rate, but other abnormal response patterns have also been reported. Continuing investigations will improve understanding of autonomic disturbances that cause orthostatic intolerance and will help elaborate the role of tilt table testing in their evaluation and management.

Unexplained syncope: clinical management

The management of unexplained syncope begins with the patient's history and physical examination, which are oriented to help separate benign from serious causes. Malignant etiologies are more likely to occur with exertional syncope. Cardiac causes should be considered, particularly cardiomyopathy, postoperative congenital heart disease, right ventricular dysplasia, anomalous coronary artery, pulmonary artery hypertension, myocarditis, long QT syndrome, and Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Neurological and metabolic disorders may underlie a syncope episode. After malignant causes of syncope have been excluded and the diagnosis of neurocardiac syncope has been established, treatment strategies include behavior modification, salt and increased fluids, and pharmacological agents. Efficacious agents include beta-blockers, dysopyramide, fludrocortisones, and alpha agents. Yet, behavior modification alone may be as effective as salt or pharmacological therapy. Because the natural history of neurocardiac syncope in children is spontaneous resolution, it is appropriate to try the simple measures before introducing drug therapy.