Palmaz-Schatz stenting for treatment of focal vein graft stenosis: immediate results and long-term outcome

Late coronary artery stenting in patients with acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

The safety and efficacy of late coronary artery stenting of the infarct-related artery after acute infarction has not been evaluated previously.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Coronary artery stenting was performed in 117 consecutive patients with acute infarction who were receiving ticlopidine/aspirin regimen without coumarin. There were 97 men and 18 women, aged 58+/-11 (mean +/- SD) years. A total of 136 Palmaz-Schatz stents were successfully implanted in 130 lesions 15+/-8 days after acute myocardial infarction (median 9 days) in 115 of 117 (98%) patients. The minimal luminal diameter (MLD) increased from 0.66+/-0.46 to 3.14+/-0.53 mm (P< .001), with an acute gain of 2.49+/-0.61 mm. One patient had acute thrombosis requiring further stenting and another patient received emergency bypass surgery. There was no subacute thrombosis or other complications. During a follow-up duration of 14+/-3 months, 2 patients had angina pectoris develop and 1 died suddenly. Sixty-two patients underwent a follow-up coronary angiography 195+/-36 days after stenting. Restenosis was noted in 8 patients (13%); the MLD was 2.19+/-0.73 mm, the late loss was 0.96+/-0.65 mm (P< .001), the loss index was 0.39+/-0.28, and the net gain was 1.56+/-0.79 mm (P< .001). The angiographic left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 47%+/-12% to 55%+/-12% (P< .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Late coronary stenting of the infarct-related artery in patients with acute myocardial infarction is a safe and effective late reperfusion therapy and may be beneficial to the patients.

Biocompatibility of polyurethane-coated stents: tissue and vascular aspects

To assess the arterial injury triggered by polyurethane-coated vs. uncoated stents, six polyurethane-coated and six bare nitinol stents were implanted in rabbit carotid arteries. All animals were sacrificed 4 wk after stent placement. Sections were evaluated by histology and morphometric analysis. At 4 wk, both the coated and uncoated stent struts were entirely endothelialized. The spaces between the struts showed a relatively mild proliferative response, with a few sections demonstrating neovascularization around the struts. Polyurethane coating was associated with an inflammatory tissue response consisting of lymphocytic infiltration and foreign-body reaction, with the appearance of multinucleated giant cells. Lumen, intimal, and medial cross-sectional areas varied little between coated and uncoated stented vessels (2.45+/-0.19 vs. 2.47+/-0.47 mm2, 1.17+/-0.52 vs. 0.78+/-0.30 mm2, and 0.66+/-0.18 vs. 0.58+/-0.27 mm2, respectively). In the rabbit carotid artery model, polyurethane coating does not affect the degree of neointimal proliferation after endovascular stenting compared with the conventional stenting approach. However, the inflammatory tissue response may indicate a low intrinsic biocompatibility of this stable polymer, so that it may not be an ideal material for coating intravascular devices.

Morphologic comparison of atherosclerotic lesions in native coronary arteries and saphenous vein graphs with intracoronary angioscopy in patients with unstable angina

BACKGROUND

Coronary vein grafts develop accelerated atherosclerosis after aortocoronary bypass surgery. Previous pathologic studies have suggested that the morphologic appearance of atherosclerotic lesions in saphenous vein grafts may have subtle differences compared with those of native coronary arteries and may be more prone to disruption and thrombus formation. However, a comparative in vivo assessment of the angioscopic morphology differences between these two types of vessels has not been reported previously. We compared the angioscopic lesion morphology of native coronary arteries and saphenous vein grafts in patients with unstable angina.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Percutaneous coronary angioscopy was performed in 60 consecutive patients with unstable angina. Plaque color, texture, friability, and the presence of atherosclerotic plaque ulceration or intracoronary thrombus were noted in the culprit lesion. The culprit lesion was located in native coronary arteries in 42 (70%) patients and in a saphenous vein graft in 18 (30%) patients. There were no significant differences in age, sex, and coronary risk factors including tobacco use, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, or diabetes mellitus between the two populations. There were also no significant differences between the two groups in terms of plaque color, surface texture, or the incidence of complex plaque morphology (plaque ulceration and intracoronary thrombosis). Loosely adherent, friable plaque, detected by angioscopy, was absent in native coronary arteries and was present in 44% of the saphenous vein grafts (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our angioscopic study indicate that other than a high incidence of plaque friability in vein grafts, the surface morphology of culprit lesions in unstable angina patients is quite similar for saphenous vein grafts and native coronary arteries.

Frequency, predictors, and appropriateness of blood transfusion after percutaneous coronary interventions

Increased awareness of the risks of blood-borne infections has recently led to profound changes in the practice of transfusion medicine. These changes include, among others, the development of guidelines by the American College of Physicians (ACP) for transfusion. Although the incidence and predictors of vascular complications of percutaneous interventions have been well defined, there are currently no data on frequency, risk factors, and appropriateness of blood transfusions. We performed a retrospective analysis of 628 consecutive percutaneous coronary revascularization procedures. Predictors of blood transfusion were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Appropriateness of transfusions was determined using modified ACP guidelines. Transfusions were administered after 8.9% of interventions (56 of 628). Multivariate analysis identified age >70 years, female gender, procedure duration, coronary stenting, acute myocardial infarction, postprocedural use of heparin and intra-aortic balloon pump placement as independent predictors of blood transfusions (all p <0.05). According to the ACP guidelines, 36 of 56 patients (64%) received transfusions inappropriately. Transfusion reactions (fever) occurred in 10% of patients who received tranfusions appropriately and in 5% of patients who received tranfusions inappropriately. The estimated additional costs per procedure related to transfusions were $551 and $419, respectively. In conclusion, unnecessary transfusions were performed frequently after percutaneous coronary interventions. Application of available guidelines could reduce the number of unnecessary transfusions, thus avoiding exposure of patients to additional risks and reducing procedural costs.

Total reconstruction of a diseased saphenous vein graft by means of conventional and autologous tissue-coated stents

This is the first report of a total reconstruction of a diseased saphenous vein graft, with thrombus-containing lesion and multiple stenoses, by the implantation of arterial graft- and venous graft-coated stents, and of conventional stents. The procedure was successful without any complications, and follow-up angiography after 6 months revealed patency of the vessel.

Micro stent I, initial results, and six months follow-up by quantitative coronary angiography

The Micro stent (MS) is a balloon expandable stent that allows the treatment of stenoses in distal and tortuous coronary arteries. This prospective study was performed to evaluate initial and late results of MS implantations. A total of 127 MS (101 in native coronary arteries and 26 in saphenous vein grafts) were implanted in 85 patients (1.5 stents/pt, 65 male, and 20 female, age 62, +/-10 yr) with angina pectoris class II-III: 21 (25%), angina pectoris class IV: 41(48%), and acute myocardial infarction: 23 (27%). Indications per segment treated (n=93): elective: 49 (53%); suboptimal balloon angioplasty (PTCA) result: 33 (35%); bailout: 11 (12%). The patients were discharged with 100 mg of aspirin daily unless other indications for oral anticoagulants were present. Procedural success (diameter stenosis of 30% without the occurrence of clinical events within 3 wk) was 85%. Early clinical events (<3 wk included: death:1%; subacute closure: 5%; coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG): 1%; vascular complications: 4%. Late clinical events (3 wk-6 mo) included: acute myocardial infarction:3%, PTCA 5%, CABG 3%, angina class Ill-IV: 4%. Quantitative angiographic results were: the minimum lumen diameter increased from 0.90+/-0.72 before to 3.05+/-0.48 mm (<P0.001) after stent implantation. At follow-up, which was 5.5 mo +/-1.1 mo, 61/79 pts (77%), the loss in diameter was 0.90+/-0.68 mm. The net gain was 1.26+/-0.90 mm. The restenosis rate (diameter stenosis > 50% at FU) was 13%. This study demonstrates high procedural and late success rates of Micro stent implantations.

[Pathophysiology and therapeutic concepts in coronary restenosis]

Demonstration of a reduced restenosis rate after stent implantation (Benestent, STRESS) has initiated rapid increase in stent implantation rates with widening indications. At present, the majority of stents are implanted in "none-Benestent/STRESS-lesions" with the consequence of a higher restenosis rate as previously expected. Stent restenosis has therefore become a relevant problem in interventional cardiology. In contrast to balloon angioplasty, where acute and subacute recoil represents the major mechanism of restenosis, stent restenosis is exclusively attributed to neointima proliferation. Morphological studies have demonstrated that neointima is caused by early smooth muscle cell ingrowth with a maximum after 7 days which is then gradually replaced by extracellular matrix. Systematic clinical, angiographic and intravascular ultrasound studies have identified several risk factors for increased stent restenosis such as: diabetes mellitus, treatment of restenosis, serial stent implantation, small and calcified vessels, ostial lesions, venous bypass grafts and complex stenosis morphology. In addition, there is increasing evidence that aggressive implantation techniques with high pressures and oversized balloons may also induce higher restenosis rates. Optimal treatment of instent restenosis has not been determined so far. Balloon angioplasty is at present considered the therapeutic option of choice. Several small studies have shown, that in short, discrete lesions (< 10 mm) results of simple PTCA are acceptable with re-restenosis rates between 15 and 35%. The intervention is considered safe with low complication rates. In 10 to 15% additional stent implantation is necessary, usually due to dissections proximal or distal to the treated stent. In long, diffuse stent restenosis (> or = 10 mm), however, PTCA results in high re-restenosis rates up to > 80%. This is most likely due to insufficient early balloon angioplasty results with minimal luminal diameters (MLD) significantly below the previous stent diameter. Therefore, debulking techniques have been used to reduce neointima burden within the stent. At present 3 techniques are available: directional coronary atherectomy (DCA), Excimerlaser angioplasty (ELCA) or high frequency rotablation. All of these techniques achieve a significant reduction in plaque volume within the stent and in combination with balloon angioplasty allow larger MLDs than PTCA alone. Limited experiences with ELCA and rotablation have shown that the techniques are safe without major periinterventional complications. DCA, however, has been accompanied with stent destruction and therefore should be considered with large care, especially in stents with coil design. At present, no randomized controlled trials for the comparison of debulking techniques with or without balloon angioplasty versus balloon angioplasty alone are available. Three multicenter trials have been initiated (LARS, ARTIST and TWISTER) to compare debulking techniques versus balloon angioplasty in diffuse stent restenosis. Adjunct medical treatment after interventions for stent restenosis is usually limited to ASS alone, indications for additional application of Ticlopidine have not been verified so far. Positive results are expected for the use of local radiation therapy either by radioactive stent implantation or afterloading techniques. With increasing stent implantation rates and indications, about 400,000 stents will be implanted in 1997 worldwide. Considering a low restenosis rate of 20%, 80,000 stent restenosis will occur within one year. Final recommendations for optimal treatment of these patients are not yet available.

Acute and long-term outcome after Palmaz-Schatz stenting: analysis from the New Approaches to Coronary Intervention (NACI) registry

The randomized Stent Restenosis Study (STRESS) and Belgium Netherlands Stent (Benestent) trials established that elective use of Palmaz-Schatz stents (PSSs) in native coronary arteries with de novo lesions is associated with increased procedural success and reduced restenosis. However there are other clinical indications for which stents are commonly used (unplanned use, vein grafts, restenosis lesions) that are not addressed in these studies. From 1990-1992, 688 lesions in 628 patients were treated with PSSs in the New Approaches to Coronary Intervention (NACI) registry. Angiographic core laboratory readings were available for 543 patients (595 lesions, of which 106 were stented for unplanned indications, 239 were in saphenous vein bypass grafts, and 296 were previously treated). The cohort of patients in whom stents were placed for unplanned indications had more women, current smokers, and had a higher incidence of recent myocardial infarction (MI). Patients who underwent stenting of saphenous vein grafts were older, had a higher incidence of diabetes mellitus, unstable angina, prior MI, and congestive heart failure. Lesion success was similar in all cohorts (98%), but procedural success was significantly higher for planned stenting (96% vs 87%; p < 0.01). Predictors of adverse events in-hospital were presence of a significant left main stenosis and stenting for unplanned indication. The incidence of target lesion revascularization by 30 days was significantly higher for patients undergoing unplanned stenting due to a higher risk for stent thrombosis. Recent MI, stenting in native lesion, and small postprocedural minimum lumen diameter independently predicted target lesion revascularization at 30 days. Independent predictors of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization at 1 year included severe concomitant disease, high risk for surgery, left main disease, stenting in the left main coronary artery, and low postprocedure minimum lumen diameter.

Long-term follow-up of a high risk cohort after stent implantation in saphenous vein grafts

OBJECTIVES

We sought to provide short- and long-term clinical outcomes of a high risk cohort treated with stents in saphenous vein grafts (SVGs).

BACKGROUND

Data on the long-term outcome of SVG stenting in high risk patients are limited.

METHODS

Johnson & Johnson stents were implanted in the SVGs of 186 patients (302 stents, 244 lesions). Ninety percent of patients presented with myocardial infarction (MI) or unstable angina (mean +/- SD ejection fraction [EF] 44 +/- 11%, patient age 71 +/- 9 years, graft age 9.4 +/- 5 years). Using a risk score classification, 155 patients (83%) were defined as high risk for repeat surgical repair or angioplasty.

RESULTS

The procedural success rate was 97.3%, with 2.7% major complications (death, Q wave MI, coronary artery bypass graft surgery [CABG]). Clinical follow-up was obtained in 177 patients (mean 19.1 +/- 13.5 months, range 7 to 59). Event rates were 10% for death; 9% for MI; 11% for repeat CABG; and 15% for repeat angioplasty (total events 45%). Kaplan-Meier estimated survival and event-free survival at 4 years were 0.79 +/- 0.06 and 0.29 +/- 0.07, respectively. Predictors of death were congestive heart failure (p < 0.01) and EF <44% (p < 0.05). Predictors of combined events of death, MI and CABG were low EF (p < 0.01) and high SVG age (>10 years, p < 0.01). There were 66 revascularization procedures (35% of patients), 24% of which were in nontarget lesions. Fifty-three percent of the cardiac events occurred during the first year of follow-up. Of the 160 survivors, 36% were free of angina, 49% were in Canadian Cardiovascular Society functional class I or II, and 15% were in class III or IV. Sixty-nine percent of patients were in class I or II according to the Specific Activity Scale, and 31% of patients were in class III or IV.

CONCLUSIONS

Balloon-expandable stent implantation in the SVGs of high risk patients is associated with a low early complication rate. Expected survival rates are good, as are the anginal and functional classifications, but there is a high rate of recurrent events and need for repeat revascularization. Vein graft stenting is an acceptable palliative option in many high risk patients.

Stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty for obstructed coronary bypass grafts. Saphenous Vein De Novo Trial Investigators

BACKGROUND

Treatment of stenosis in saphenous-vein grafts after coronary-artery bypass surgery is a difficult challenge. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of stent placement with those of balloon angioplasty on clinical and angiographic outcomes in patients with obstructive disease of saphenous-vein grafts.

METHODS

A total of 220 patients with new lesions in aortocoronary-venous bypass grafts were randomly assigned to placement of Palmaz-Schatz stents or standard balloon angioplasty. Coronary angiography was performed during the index procedure and six months later.

RESULTS

As compared with the patients assigned to angioplasty, those assigned to stenting had a higher rate of procedural efficacy, defined as a reduction in stenosis to less than 50 percent of the vessel diameter without a major cardiac complication (92 percent vs. 69 percent, P<0.001), but they had more frequent hemorrhagic complications (17 percent vs. 5 percent, P<0.01). Patients in the stent group had a larger mean (+/-SD) increase in luminal diameter immediately after the procedure (1.92+/-0.30 mm, as compared with 1.21+/-0.37 mm in the angioplasty group; P<0.001) and a greater mean net gain in luminal diameter at six months (0.85+/-0.96 vs. 0.54+/-0.91 mm, P=0.002). Restenosis occurred in 37 percent of the patients in the stent group and in 46 percent of the patients in the angioplasty group (P=0.24). The outcome in terms of freedom from death, myocardial infarction, repeated bypass surgery, or revascularization of the target lesion was significantly better in the stent group (73 percent vs. 58 percent, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

As compared with balloon angioplasty, stenting of selected venous bypass-graft lesions resulted in superior procedural outcomes, a larger gain in luminal diameter, and a reduction in major cardiac events. However, there was no significant benefit in the rate of angiographic restenosis, which was the primary end point of the study.

Transluminal extraction catheter atherectomy followed by immediate stenting in treatment of saphenous vein grafts

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of transluminal extraction catheter (TEC) atherectomy followed by immediate Palmaz-Schatz coronary stenting of coronary bypass vein grafts.

BACKGROUND

Degeneration of saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts has become a common problem. Repeat bypass surgery is associated with greater risk and a poorer outcome than the initial operation. Moreover, percutaneous interventional procedures in vein grafts have been associated with high procedural complication rates, including distal embolization, and high restenosis rates. TEC atherectomy may reduce distal embolization, and stenting may reduce restenosis rates.

METHODS

We evaluated the procedural, hospital and clinical outcomes of TEC atherectomy followed by immediate Palmaz-Schatz coronary stenting of 53 vein grafts in 49 consecutive patients. The strategy was to limit instrumentation to extraction debulking and to stabilizing the site with stent deployment before using balloon dilation for optimal gain in lumen diameter.

RESULTS

Results are shown as mean value (95% confidence interval [CI]). The mean graft age was 9.2 years (95% CI 7.9 to 10.5), and 1.0 (95% CI 1 to 1) TEC cutter (2.2 mm [95% CI 2.1 to 2.3]) and 1.7 (95% CI 1.4 to 2.0) Palmaz-Schatz coronary stents/ vein graft were used. The procedural success rate was 98%, with a minimal lumen diameter at baseline of 1.3 mm (95% CI 1.1 to 1.5), increasing to 3.9 mm (95% CI 3.6 to 4.2) (p < 0.05) after the TEC-stent procedure. Procedural complications occurred infrequently: graft perforation in 1 (2%) of 53 patients and distal embolization in 1 (2%) of 53 (same patient). In-hospital complications included non-Q wave myocardial infarction in two patients and death after a successful procedure in three (6%) (n = 1 each: massive bleeding from the catheter site; sepsis; and acute myocardial infarction with asystole in the distribution of the stented vessel). The event-free survival rate to hospital discharge was 90%. Clinical follow-up (13 months [95% CI 11 to 15]) was available for all patients. There were five (11%) revascularization procedures (three bypass grafts and two percutaneous transluminal coronary interventions), four (9%) nonfatal myocardial infarctions and five (11%) deaths, for a cumulative rate of 28% for any adverse outcome occurring in 13 of 46 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

TEC atherectomy followed by immediate Palmaz-Schatz coronary stenting of stenoses in old (> 9 years) saphenous vein grafts can be successfully performed, with a low incidence of procedural and hospital complications. Clinical restenosis rates are low and less than those previously reported; however, late morbid cardiac events are still frequent in this high risk group of patients. These observational findings suggest that this technique may improve percutaneous management of vein graft disease, but optimal long-term management strategies remain to be determined.

Improving the results of coronary angioplasty

Coronary angioplasty has changed dramatically in the past three years with major reductions in suboptimal results and restenosis rates, and improvements in safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Intracoronary stent implantation with optimisation of strut expansion and the abandonment of anticoagulants after deployment, have led to less entry-site complications, facilitated early hospital discharge, virtually abolished subacute stent thrombosis and resulted in a 50% reduction in target vessel revascularisation. Adjuvant medical treatment with anti-platelet agents, including glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors, improves the safety of angioplasty and may further reduce the restenosis rate. Selective use of debulking devices has extended the indications for angioplasty. High resolution fluoroscopy, quantitative coronary angiography and intracoronary ultrasound leading to improved diagnosis, equipment selection and treatment have contributed to better outcomes. Further clinical trials will compare angioplasty and stent implantation with coronary bypass surgery in patients with multivessel coronary disease, and may extend the indications for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) to selected patients with three vessel disease.

Multivessel Palmaz-Schatz stenting: early results and one-year outcome

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the benefits outlined in Background might extend to patients with multivessel disease, we examined the short- and long-term outcome of multivessel Palmaz-Schatz stenting.

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) has become the dominant treatment for most patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease and has emerged as an alternative treatment for selected patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Although multivessel angioplasty has excellent early results and low procedural complication rates, long-term outcome is tempered by the frequent need for repeat revascularization. In patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease, Palmaz-Schatz stenting has been shown to have a higher success rate and a lower restenosis rate than conventional PTCA.

METHODS

A total of 103 patients (mean age 64 +/- 11 years, 78 men and 25 women) underwent stenting of 212 vessels (saphenous vein graft [53%], left anterior descending coronary artery [20%], left circumflex artery [12%] and right coronary artery [15%]). In 88 patients (85%), multivessel stenting was performed during the same procedure, whereas the remaining 15 patients (15%) had staged multivessel stenting within 1 week of the index stent. Stenting involved only native coronary arteries in 33 patients and only vein grafts in 51 patients.

RESULTS

Angiographic success was achieved in 102 patients (99%). Major complications developed in three patients: one patient died, and two patients had Q wave myocardial infarction, with no emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery or stent thrombosis. Eleven additional patients (11%) developed non-Q wave myocardial infarction, and nine patients (9%) had local vascular complications requiring surgical repair. Clinical follow-up was available in all patients at a mean of 13 +/- 8 months. At 1 year, survival was 98%, with an event-free survival rate of 80%, reflecting predominantly repeat revascularization (17% overall, with 9% target site revascularization). Multivessel native coronary stenting resulted in a higher event-free survival rate and a lower probability of repeat revascularization than did multivessel saphenous vein graft stenting.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected patients, multivessel Palmaz-Schatz stenting is technically feasible and carries both excellent early results and favorable 1-year clinical outcome.

Late myocardial ischemic events after saphenous vein graft intervention--importance of initially "nonsignificant" vein graft lesions

Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization (PCR) for narrowed saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) have a high incidence of subsequent cardiac events, but the relative contribution of treated and untreated SVGs, and of native coronary narrowings to late events is uncertain. This study evaluated the role of progression of SVG disease at untreated sites to cardiac events in these patients. All patients with successful PCR of SVG lesions who were enrolled in clinical trials with mandated repeat angiography from 1990 to 1994 were studied. One hundred three patients (age 63 +/- 8 years, 82% men, ejection fraction 54 +/- 12%, graft age 8 +/- 4 years), contributing 1,095 analyzable 15- to 25-mm SVG segments were followed 29 +/- 13 months (4 patients were lost to follow-up). Actuarial event-free (death, myocardial infarction, bypass surgery, or PCR) and overall survival at 12 months were 47 +/- 5% and 94 +/- 2%, respectively. Fifty-six percent of all early (< or = 12 months) events resulted from ischemia from recurrence at initially treated SVG sites, 26% at nontreated SVG sites, and 14% at nontreated native coronary sites. By 36 months, event-free and overall survival were 25 +/- 6% and 86 +/- 4%, respectively. Events occurring > 12 months after initial treatment resulted most frequently from ischemia from progression of narrowing at untreated SVG sites (46%). Ischemic events from initially untreated SVG sites were correlated with initial percent stenosis (initial, 41% to 50%; 45% events, 31% to 40%; 18% events, < or = 30%; 2% events, p <0.001) and reference SVG diameter (p = 0.003). Recurrent ischemic events from initially treated SVG sites were independently correlated with initial percent stenosis (initial > 75%; 43% events, 50% to 75%; 27% events, < 50%; 18% events, p = 0.01), but not with final percent stenosis. The frequent occurrence of events from nontreated 41% to 50% stenoses suggests a need for increased surveillance in patients with these lesions. The low incidence of events from initially treated lesions < 50% suggests that the hypothesis that "nonsignificant" 41% to 50% lesions might best be treated at the time other more severe narrowings are treated should be examined.

Coronary implantation of silicone-carbide-coated Palmaz-Schatz stents in patients with high risk of stent thrombosis without oral anticoagulation

Coronary stenting in bail-out situations is effective but associated with increased stent thrombosis and bleeding rates. Silicone-carbide coating reduces fibrinogen activation on alloplastic surfaces and thus may also reduce stent thromboses. A total of 44 patients received 58 silicone-carbide-coated stents for threatened (80%) or abrupt (20%) closure. In addition to heparin, patients were treated with aspirin and ticlopidine (75%) or aspirin (25%) only. Two patients (4.5%) died in the hospital. The combined in-hospital complication rate including death, emergency revascularization, stent-related myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis was 9% (4 of 44 patients). Major bleeding occurred in 4 patients (9%). Six-month follow-up angiography was obtained in all eligible patients (42 of 44), revealing a restenosis rate of 21% (9 of 42). Thus, coronary implantation of silicone-carbide-coated stents is feasible in bail-out situations without oral anticoagulation and with a low complication rate. Further studies are required to optimize the anticoagulation regimen with this type of coating.

Temporary arterial stenting: comparison to permanent stenting and conventional balloon injury in a rabbit carotid artery model

The objective was to assess the arterial wall response to temporary stenting with a removable nitinol stent in comparison with permanent stenting and balloon injury at 28 days in the rabbit carotid artery. Restenosis remains an important limiting factor after the implantation of permanent metallic stents and balloon angioplasty. We have developed a temporary nitinol stent that uses a bolus injection of warmed saline to collapse the stent for percutaneous removal. Vascular changes related to the thermal saline bolus injection required to remove a nitinol implanted stent were assessed in 12 rabbit carotid arteries at 7 and 28 days postinjection. Nitinol stents, inflated to 3.0 mm diameter, were implanted for 3 days (n = 6) and histology and quantitative histomorphometry examined at 28 days. Results were compared with permanently implanted stents (n = 5) and balloon injury (n = 9). Dual bolus injection of 10 ml at 70 degrees C created an acute necrotizing injury and chronic neointimal proliferation, whereas injections of 5 ml at 63 degrees C were minimally injurious. Temporary stenting resulted in the least neointimal proliferation measured by the intima to media ratio (0.22 +/- 0.10 vs. 1.59 +/- 0.31 for permanent stenting and; 0.49 +/- 0.14 for balloon injury; P < 0.001). Temporary stenting maintained a significantly larger lumen than balloon (1.53 +/- 0.72 mm2 vs. 0.64 +/- 0.14 mm2; P < 0.001), which could not be explained by absolute changes in intimal cross sectional area (0.14 +/- 0.07 mm2 vs. 0.21 +/- 0.06 mm2 respectively; P = 0.33). Temporary stenting resulted in a relatively larger vessel area within the external elastic lamina than with balloon (2.28 +/- 1.06 mm2 vs. 1.30 +/- 0.18 mm2; P = 0.007). The thermal stent recovery process can create necrotizing vascular injury and neointimal proliferation at higher temperatures and injectate volumes. Stent removal after 3 days using 63 degrees C saline bolus injection results in less neointimal proliferation than with permanent stents or balloon injury. In comparison to balloon injury, temporary stenting also may have a long-lasting beneficial effect on vessel recoil and remodeling, resulting in larger lumen size after stent removal.

Outcome of reoperative coronary bypass surgery versus coronary angioplasty after previous bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

The immediate and long-term outcomes of reoperative coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) (n = 1561) and catheter-based coronary intervention (angioplasty) (n = 2613) were compared in patients from Emory University Hospitals who had previous CABG.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The surgical and angioplasty procedures and statistical methods were standard. Data were collected prospectively and entered into a computerized database. Followup was by letter, telephone, or additional events resulting in readmission. In the angioplasty group, 2.9% required in-hospital CABG. Hospital mortality was 1.2% after angioplasty versus 6.8% after repeat CABG (P < .0001). Recurrent angina was noted frequently at about 4 years and was more common after angioplasty. One-, 5-, and 10-year mortalities were 11%, 24%, and 49% after CABG versus 6%, 22%, and 38% after angioplasty. Survival corrected for baseline differences did not vary with the choice of procedure. There were more additional procedures after angioplasty. Patients undergoing angioplasty may be divided into those with procedures only in native coronary arteries (n = 1545), only in vein grafts (n = 869), and a mixture (n = 199), with respective 10 year survivals of 66%, 56%, and 65% (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

These patients have a high incidence of events both in-hospital and in the long term. Although initial mortality was higher after CABG, after baseline differences were accounted for, there was no difference in the long term. Patients more frequently have additional procedures after angioplasty. Choice of therapy should consider clinical and angiographic suitability and patient preference.

Interventional cardiology and intracoronary stents--a changing practice: approved vs. nonapproved indications

Our objective was to document change in stent usage in a single practice over time and to study "off-label" compared to Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indications. Although only two intracoronary stents have been approved by the FDA, the relatively limited approved indications do not account for the dramatic increase in stent implantation. This increase has important implications for patient health care delivery. This study of stent usage in a single center over a 36-mo period included all patients treated with coronary stents at the Mayo Clinic from January 1993-December 1995, and evaluated the relative difference in frequency between "off-label" and FDA-approved indications for implantation. During the 36-mo period of study, 3,614 interventional procedures were done and one or more stents were placed in 25.4% of patients. The proportion of patients receiving stents increased throughout this time: during the first 6-mo period, stents were placed in 6.2% of procedures; during the last 6-mo period, stents were placed in 46.3% of procedures, an eightfold increase. During the final 6 mo, an unapproved device or an unapproved indication for an approved device constituted 59.4% of all stent procedures. In addition, use of the non-FDA-approved adjunctive treatment regimen without warfarin increased from 2.9% in the first 6-mo period of observation to 82.7% in the last 6 mo. The use of stents increased strikingly over a 36-mo period, from 6% to 46% of all procedures. The majority of implantations were performed either for an "off-label" unapproved indication or with an unapproved device.

Percutaneous treatment of protected and unprotected left main coronary stenoses with new devices: immediate angiographic results and intermediate-term follow-up

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the immediate angiographic results and intermediate-term follow-up after percutaneous treatment of left main coronary stenoses in the new device era.

BACKGROUND

Historically, balloon angioplasty of left main coronary stenoses has been associated with high procedural morbidity and poor long-term results. It is not clear whether new devices are more effective in this anatomic setting.

METHODS

Between July 1993 and July 1995, we performed initial left main coronary interventions on 46 patients (mean age 67 +/- 12 years, 26% women). Quantitative angiography was available for 42 of 46 interventions, and clinical follow-up was obtained for all patients at 1 month, 6 months and 1 year after initial revascularization.

RESULTS

Most interventions (42 of 46) were performed in patients with "protected" coronary stenoses to the left coronary system owing to the presence of one or more patent left main coronary grafts. Seventy-seven percent of screened patients were deemed unsuitable for repeat coronary artery bypass surgery. Procedures performed included stenting in 73% of patients (alone in 30% and after rotational atherectomy in 43%), rotational atherectomy in 58% (alone in 15% and before stenting in 43%), directional atherectomy in 4% and angioplasty alone in 7%. Initial procedural success was achieved in all interventions, with no deaths, myocardial infarctions (creatine kinase, MB fraction > 50 IU/liter) or emergent bypass surgery. Follow-up data to date (median duration 9 months, range 6 to 19) demonstrate a 98% overall survival rate and a 6-month event-free survival rate of 78% (six target vessel revascularizations [TVRs], four non-TVRs).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of protected left main coronary artery stenoses can be accomplished safely and effectively with new device technology. Intermediate-term follow-up demonstrates an acceptably low rate of death, myocardial infarction or repeat revascularization at 6 months and 1 year.

Influence of procedural success on immediate and long-term clinical outcome of patients undergoing percutaneous revascularization of occluded coronary artery bypass vein grafts

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine whether successful recanalization of an occluded vein graft is associated with improvement in long-term clinical outcome.

BACKGROUND

Coronary angioplasty of occluded vein grafts is associated with a lower initial success rate and a higher complication rate than angioplasty of vein grafts with subtotal stenoses and native coronary arteries. Whether successful angioplasty improves clinical outcome is unknown.

METHODS

We analyzed 77 consecutive patients who underwent angioplasty of an occluded saphenous vein coronary artery bypass graft between August 1983 and June 1994. Patients with a myocardial infarction in the previous 24 h were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study cohort was 65 years; the mean (+/- SD) age of the treated grafts was 7.5 +/- 3.9 years. As an adjunct to balloon angioplasty, stents were used in 9% of procedures, laser in 30%, and atherectomy in 16%, and thrombolytic therapy was administered in 23% of patients. The angioplasty success rate was 71%. Major complications within 30 days of the procedure included death in 5.2% of patients, Q wave myocardial infarction in 1.3% and repeat bypass surgery in 7.8%; these events occurred with similar frequency in patients in whom angiographic success was and was not achieved. Kaplan-meier analysis comparing patients in whom angioplasty was successful (n = 55) and not successful (n = 22) revealed no differences in survival or occurrence of myocardial infarction or recurrent severe angina between the two groups in the 3 years after the procedure. Univariate analysis identified the age of the graft and use of newer interventional devices as predictors of death or myocardial infarction during this time period; procedural success was not associated with freedom from these adverse events after adjusting for these variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Angioplasty of occluded vein grafts is associated with a low initial success rate and a high complication rate. Successful angioplasty does not appear to reduce the occurrence of adverse events in the 3 years after the procedure.

Coronary angioplasty versus repeat coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with previous bypass surgery

OBJECTIVES

We attempted to determine the relative risks and benefits of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and repeat coronary artery bypass grafting (re-CABG) in patients with previous coronary bypass surgery (CABG).

BACKGROUND

Due to an expanding population of patients with surgically treated coronary artery disease and the natural progression of atherosclerosis, an increasing number of patients with previous CABG require repeat revascularization procedures. Although there are randomized comparative data for CABG versus medical therapy and, more recently, versus PTCA, these studies have excluded patients with previous CABG.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 632 patients with previous CABG who required either elective re-CABG (n = 164) or PTCA (n = 468) at a single center during 1987 through 1988. The PTCA and re-CABG groups were similar with respect to gender (83% vs. 85% male), age > 70 years (21% vs. 23%), mean left ventricular ejection fraction (46% vs. 48%), presence of class III or IV angina (70% vs. 63%) and three-vessel coronary artery disease (77% vs. 74%).

RESULTS

Complete revascularization was achieved in 38% of patients with PTCA and 92% of those with re-CABG (p < 0.0001). The in-hospital complication rates were significantly lower in the PTCA group: death (0.3% vs. 7.3%, p < 0.0001) and Q wave myocardial infarction (MI) (0.9% vs. 6.1%, p < 0.0001). Actuarial survival was equivalent at 1 year (PTCA 95% vs. re-CABG 91%) and 6 years (PTCA 74% vs. re-CABG 73%) of follow-up (p = 0.32). Both procedures resulted in equivalent event-free survival (freedom from dealth or Q wave MI) and relief of angina; however, the need for repeat percutaneous or surgical revascularization, or both, by 6 years was significantly higher in the PTCA group (PTCA 64% vs. re-CABG 8%, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified age > 70 years, left ventricular ejection fraction < 40%, unstable angina, number of diseased vessels and diabetes mellitus as independent correlates of mortality for the entire group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this nonrandomized series of patients with previous CABG requiring revascularization, an initial stategy of either PTCA or re-CABG resulted in equivalent overall survival, event-free survival and relief of angina. PTCA offers lower procedural morbidity and mortality risks, although it is associated with less complete revascularization and a greater need for subsequent revascularization procedures.

Long-term (4- to 6-year) outcome of Palmaz-Schatz stenting: paucity of late clinical stent-related problems

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this prospective single-center study was to evaluate the longer-term outcome of Palmaz-Schatz stenting in the treatment of native coronary and saphenous vein bypass graft disease.

BACKGROUND

The STRESS (Stent Restenosis Study) and BENESTENT (Belgian Netherlands Stent) trials have demonstrated a decrease in both angiographic restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization in the 1st year for vessels treated by stenting rather than balloon angioplasty. Longer-term (1 to 5 years) clinical results of Palmaz-Schatz stenting are not yet well established. Late migration of the stent, metal fatigue, endarteritis and late restenosis have all been proposed as potential late clinical complications of coronary stent implantation.

METHODS

The study cohort consisted of 175 consecutive patients who underwent elective placement of 194 Palmaz-Schatz stents in 185 vessels. Clinical events (death, myocardial infarction, recurrent angina or any revascularization) were assessed at 6 weeks, 2, 4 and 6 months, 1 year and yearly thereafter. Clinical follow-up was available on all patients at a mean +/- SD of 54 +/- 17 months.

RESULTS

Angiographic success was achieved in 173 patients (98.9%); angiographic restenosis was observed at 6 months in 26.1% of target sites. The survival rate was 86.7% at 5 years, with a 5-year event-free survival rate decreasing progressively to 50.7%, reflecting primarily repeat revascularization procedures (41.2% at 5 years). However, the rate of repeat revascularization of the treatment site (target site revascularization [TSR]) was 14.4%, 17.7% and 19.8% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively, with late (> 1 year) TSR driven by in-stent restenosis in only 3 patients (1.7%). Rates of both 5-year survival (70.5% vs. 93.4%) and event-free survival (21.1% vs. 63.3%) were lower for patients who underwent saphenous vein graft (SVG) stenting than for those with native coronary artery stenting. However, 5-year TSR rates were similar for SVGs (21.9%) and native vessels (19.2%), indicating that the higher incidence of repeat revascularization for SVGs was due to an increase in non-TSR, driven by progressive disease at other sites.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term outcome of stenting shows stability of the treated lesion, with only a slight increase in TSR between 2 and 5 years (17.1% to 19.8%). The progressive increase in repeat revascularization over that period (24% to 41%) and most ongoing late events can be attributed to the progression of coronary disease at other sites, rather than to late deterioration of the stent result itself. Such non-TSR events account for the majority of clinical events in the patients who underwent SVG stenting.

Subacute thrombosis and vascular injury resulting from slotted-tube nitinol and stainless steel stents in a rabbit carotid artery model

BACKGROUND

Our objectives were to quantify the thrombogenicity and extent of vascular injury created by slotted-tube geometry stainless steel and nitinol coronary stents in a rabbit carotid artery model.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Stents were implanted in rabbit right carotid arteries without antiplatelet therapy. Stainless steel stents were implanted for 4 days while nitinol stents were placed for 4 and 14 days (n = 8, 8, and 6, respectively). Stent thrombosis was assessed by thrombus weight, grading thrombus encroachment of the lumen, and by blood flow in the stented and contralateral arteries. Stainless steel stents at 4 days contained more thrombus than 4- and 14-day nitinol stents (20.0 +/- 5.9 versus 2.5 +/- 0.6 and 2.7 +/- 0.3 mg, respectively; P < .000001). Stainless steel stents were more often occluded by thrombus (6 of 8) or contained more subocclusive thrombus (2 of 8) than nitinol stents (0 of 14, P < .002). Resting blood flow was reduced in arteries with stainless steel stents compared with 4- and 14-day nitinol stents (1.5 +/- 2.8 versus 24.0 +/- 2.0 and 25.5 +/- 1.9 mL/min, respectively, P < .000001). Stainless steel stents were less uniformly expanded, had deeper strut penetration into the vascular wall, and were associated with more extensive medial smooth muscle cell necrosis. There were strong correlations (r = .77 to .95) between variables of thrombosis extent (thrombus weight and grade) and histologically determined vascular injury (strut penetration and medial necrosis).

CONCLUSIONS

Slotted-tube stainless steel stents were more thrombogenic and created more extensive vascular injury than nitinol stents in a rabbit carotid artery model. The mechanisms underlying these differences probably are related to metallurgic and design geometry properties of the two stent types.

Transluminal extraction atherectomy for aortosaphenous vein graft stent restenosis

The optimal strategy to manage in-stent saphenous vein graft (SVG) restenosis has not been studied. We present two cases in which transluminal extraction atherectomy (TEC) was used successfully for the treatment of SVG stent restenosis. TEC atherectomy may provide an alternative to conventional balloon angioplasty for such patients.

Intravascular imaging of serial changes of disease in saphenous vein grafts after coronary artery bypass grafting

To clarify the structural changes of saphenous vein grafts after coronary artery bypass grafting, intravascular ultrasound and angioscopic images were obtained from 23 grafts in vivo and 5 grafts and 3 new veins in vitro; the images were compared with histologic findings. Intravascular ultrasound demonstrated a single-layered appearance at new veins and all of the angiographically normal grafts within 6 months after surgery. A triple-layered appearance that might be related to the remarkably proliferative and degenerated intima was revealed histologically at 73.3% of the normal sites of grafts between 5 and 10 years after operation. In 83.3% of the stenoses at several years after operation, angioscopy showed yellow atheromatous plaques, often with a friable surface; a heterogeneous, lucent echo pattern was revealed on intravascular ultrasound. Thus intravascular ultrasound and angioscopy may be used to identify the morphologic changes of graft at different points after implantation more precisely than conventional angiography.

Long-term clinical outcome after stent implantation in saphenous vein grafts

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the role of stent implantation in vein grafts by evaluating the long-term clinical outcome and estimated event-free survival at 5 years in 62 patients and by comparing our data with those of other treatment modalities previously reported.

BACKGROUND

Patients with recurrent angina after coronary artery bypass graft surgery pose a problem. Stent implantation has been advocated in an effort to avoid repeat operation and to address the limitations of balloon angioplasty.

METHODS

Patients undergoing stenting of a vein graft were entered into a dedicated data base. They were screened for death, infarction, bypass surgery and repeat angioplasty. Procedure-related events were included in the follow-up analysis. Survival and event-free survival curves were constructed by the Kaplan Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 93 stents (84 Wallstent and 9 Palmaz-Shatz) were implanted in 62 patients. During the in-hospital period seven patients (11%) sustained a major cardiac event: two deaths (3%), two myocardial infarctions (3%) and three urgent bypass surgeries (5%). The clinical success rate, therefore, was 89%. During the follow-up period (median 2.5 years, range 0 to 5.9), another five patients (8%) died, 14 (23%) sustained a myocardial infarction, 12 (20%) underwent bypass surgery, and 14 (23%) underwent angioplasty. The estimated 5-year survival and event-free survival rates (free from infarction, repeat surgery and repeat angioplasty) were (mean +/- SD) 83 +/- 5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 73% to 93%) and 30 +/- 7% (95% CI 16% to 44%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The in-hospital outcome of patients who underwent stent implantation in a vein graft is acceptable, but the long-term clinical outcome is poor. It is unlikely that mechanical intervention alone will provide a satisfactory or definite answer for the patient with graft sclerosis over the long term.

Excimer laser angioplasty vs. balloon angioplasty in saphenous vein bypass grafts: quantitative angiographic comparison of matched lesions

Technologies which ablate or debulk tissue may result in better angiographic outcomes by altering the elastic properties of the vessel wall. Accordingly, the procedural outcomes of 88 vein graft lesions treated by either excimer laser angioplasty with adjunct balloon angioplasty (PELCA + PTCA, n = 44) (Spectranetics CVX-300, 1.4-, 1.7-, or 2.0-MM catheters) or balloon angioplasty alone (PTCA, n = 44) were analyzed by quantitative angiography (Cardiac Measurement System). Lesions were individually matched for vessel position, reference diameter (RD), and minimal luminal diameter (MLD). Matching was deemed adequate as the preprocedure MLD (PELCA + PTCA, 1.14 +/- 0.48 mm; PTCA, 1.20 +/- 0.47 mm) and RD (PELCA + PTCA, 3.23 +/- 0.56 mm; PTCA, 3.25 +/- 0.57 mm) were not significantly different. There were also no significant differences between PELCA + PTCA- and PTCA-treated lesions with respect to patient age, graft age, lesion length, symmetry, and plaque area. Balloon diameter at maximal inflation was 2.77 +/- 0.55 mm (PELCA + PTCA group) and 2.84 +/- 0.59 mm (PTCA group), P = NS. Final MLD postprocedure was 2.17 +/- 0.54 mm and 2.19 +/- 0.55 mm for PELCA + PTCA- and PTCA-treated lesions (P = NS), respectively. Vessel stretch [(balloon diameter - MLD pre)/RD], elastic recoil [(balloon diameter - MLD post)/RD], and acute gain [(MLD post - MLD pre)/RD] were calculated and normalized for vessel size (RD). Vessel stretch (PELCA + PTCA, 0.60 +/- 0.22; PTCA, 0.59 +/- 0.24; P = NS), elastic recoil (PELCA + PTCA, 0.28 +/- 0.18; PTCA, 0.26 +/- 0.16), and acute gain (PELCA + PTCA, 0.34 +/- 0.24; PTCA, 0.31 +/- 0.23; P = NS) were not significantly different between the two treatment groups. In a matched population of successfully treated vein graft lesions, PELCA + PTCA did not reduce elastic recoil or improve immediate angiographic outcome, as compared with PTCA alone.

Coronary restenosis

Return of angina within 6 months of a catheter-based treatment of coronary artery disease usually reflects restenosis due to an overly aggressive local healing response to the procedure-related arterial injury. The restenotic lesion should be treated aggressively. Patients with preexisting diabetes mellitus, renal failure requiring hemodialysis, and left anterior descending artery lesions should be considered to be at exceedingly high risk for clinically significant restenosis. Exercise testing is indicated for all patients who experience a return of their angina within 6 months of an interventional procedure. Nurse practitioners in the primary care setting may be the first clinicians to hear of the return of angina. Patients should always be reassured that repeat intervention is almost always possible and is generally effective in providing long-term relief. New devices (in particular the Palmaz-Schatz stent) may help reduce the likelihood of restenosis, to the extent that they provide a large acute post-treatment lumen diameter that is more tolerant of intimal hyperplasia without producing significant narrowing. Until adjunctive drug therapy is found that effectively reduces the local tissue response to interventional therapy, all clinicians involved in caring for patients following such procedures will need to be vigilant and knowledgeable about recognizing and treating restenosis.

Micro stent, quantitative coronary angiography, and procedural results

The Micro stent (MS) is a radiopaque stainless steel balloon expandable intracoronary stent. The stent is mounted on a rapid-exchange delivery system. From August 1994-March 1995, 127 MS were implanted in 85 patients (pts, 1.5 stents/pt, 85 in native vessels and 42 in bypass vein grafts, 61 males and 24 female, age 33-77 yr, mean age 61 +/- 10 yr). Pts studied were scheduled for either elective PTCA (n = 62, 73%) or PTCA for acute myocardial infarction (n = 23, 27%). Elective stent implantation was performed in 45 pts (53%). An MS was implanted because of a suboptimal balloon angioplasty result in 26 pts (31%). The stent was implanted because of threatened or acute vessel closure after balloon angioplasty in 14 pts (16%). During the procedure, 500 mg aspirin and 2 x 7,500 units of heparin were administered intravenously, followed by systemic heparinization for 48 hr. Pts were discharged with 100 mg aspirin daily (n = 50, 59%), or anticoagulant drugs and 100 mg aspirin daily (n = 19, 22%), or anticoagulant drugs only (n = 16, 19%). Angiographic results were analyzed with computer-assisted quantitative coronary arteriography. Angiographic success (defined as a residual stenosis of < 30%) was achieved in 124 of 127 attempts (98%). The mean minimal luminal diameter of the target lesions increased from 0.88 +/- 0.79 mm before stent implantation to 3.08 +/- 0.56 mm (P < 0.001). The percentage of diameter stenosis was reduced from 77.9 +/- 20.9% before to 13.3 +/- 10.5% (P < 0.001) after stent implantation. The average initial gain was 2.53 +/- 1.37 mm. The procedural success rate (defined as a residual stenosis of < 30% without occurrence of major clinical events within 3 wk after procedure) was 84%. Major clinical events included: death 1 pt (1%); cerebrovascular accident, 1 pt (1%); subacute stent closure, 5 pts (6%); coronary artery bypass grafting, 3 pts (4%); false femoral aneurysm, 2 pts (2%). The initial results of Micro stent implantation are promising. No anticoagulant therapy was given to most of the patients (59%). Few vascular and bleeding complications were observed. However, at this stage, no data about the restenosis rate after implantation of a Micro stent are available.

Autologous vein graft-coated stent for treatment of coronary artery disease

Acute or subacute thrombosis and late restenosis remain the main limitations of permanent stenting. In an effort to address these limitations, an autologous vein graft-coated stent (AVGCS) was developed at our institution. This stent consists of a conventional stent (Palmaz or Palmaz-Schatz, Johnson and Johnson), which is covered by an autologous vein graft. After successful experimental implantation, we report here the immediate results of the percutaneous implantation of AVGCS in 7 patients with coronary artery disease (6 de novo lesions and 1 bailout case). The results of this preliminary study indicate that the preparation of the AVGCS is easy and feasible. The implantation of the AVGCS was uncomplicated, and the immediate angiographic results were excellent. This new type of coated stent may be useful in addressing current limitations of balloon angioplasty.

Three-year clinical follow-up after Palmaz-Schatz stenting

OBJECTIVES

Our goals were to examine late clinical outcome in a cohort of patients who electively received Palmaz-Schatz intracoronary stents, to identify specific predictors of outcome and to determine the time course of the development of ischemic cardiac events after stenting.

BACKGROUND

Short-term results of Palmaz-Schatz intracoronary stenting have been promising, with a reduction in both angiographic restenosis and clinical cardiac events up to 1 year after stenting.

METHODS

We analyzed the clinical outcomes in 65 consecutive patients who underwent stenting at least 3 years before analysis. Demographic, clinical and procedural predictors of survival and event-free survival, defined as freedom from myocardial infarction, stent-site percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass graft surgery or death, were analyzed at a mean follow-up of 39 +/- 17 months.

RESULTS

Absolute survival and event-free survival at 3 years were 88% and 56%, respectively. Three-year freedom from stent-site revascularization was 66%. Predictors of decreased long-term survival (p < 0.05) included diabetes and a high angina score (Canadian Cardiovascular Society class III/IV) at 6 and 12 months after stenting. Predictors of decreased event-free survival (p < 0.05) included a high angina score at 3, 6 and 12 months after stenting, smaller stent deployment balloon size and greater number of stents implanted. Freedom from adverse events by 6 months after stenting also correlated with long-term event-free survival. Eighty-five percent of stent-site revascularizations occurred within 1 year. During late follow-up (>24 months), no patients had stent-site stenoses requiring revascularization, whereas 11% of patients required revascularization in nonstented coronary segments.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical predictors of worse long-term outcome included diabetes mellitus, higher angina score at follow-up, smaller stent deployment balloon size and greater number of stents at implantation. During follow-up, the majority of adverse events and stent-site revascularizations occurred early after stenting, and disease progression in nonstented vessels accounted for the majority of late revascularization events.

Stents for intracoronary placement: current status and future directions

The technique of intracoronary stenting has achieved remarkable progress over the last few years. Improved stent deployment techniques and optimization of postprocedural management have dramatically improved the safety of intracoronary stent placement. At present, the incidence of early vessel closure after stenting is even lower than that after standard angioplasty and, as most operators no longer prescribe aggressive anticoagulation, bleeding complications are uncommon. Stenting has become an extremely effective treatment for abrupt or threatened vessel closure or for any suboptimal angiographic result during conventional angioplasty. Furthermore, large prospective trials have demonstrated that its efficacy is superior to that of conventional angioplasty for primary restenosis prevention in focal lesions of some native coronary arteries. Ongoing trials tend to extrapolate these conclusions to saphenous vein graft lesions. Mechanical support of the vessel wall explains the sustained angiographic benefit observed after stenting. Future developments may include the use of stents as a vehicle for local drug delivery in an attempt to further reduce the incidence of restenosis. In view of these results, coronary stents should be considered a new standard therapeutic modality in interventional cardiology.

Subacute stent thrombosis: evolving issues and current concepts

During percutaneous coronary revascularization, intracoronary stents are effective in the treatment of abrupt vessel closure and improvement of suboptimal angioplasty results, and compared to balloon angioplasty, they reduce stenosis recurrence. Opposing these benefits, subacute thrombosis of stents is associated with a substantial increase in periprocedural morbidity and mortality. To review factors associated with stent thrombosis and to study the impact of evolving procedural techniques on the incidence of stent thrombosis, we reviewed all English articles from MEDLINE (1988 to 1995) with key words "stent" and "thrombosis." Stent registry data and recent abstracts from scientific meetings were also reviewed. Factors related to the clinical setting, the lesion, the stent and the procedural technique that affect the risk of stent thrombosis were identified. Sixty clinical studies were reviewed and include 7,914 patients receiving intracoronary stents. Studies were separated into those reporting stents placed emergently or electively without adjunct high-pressure balloon inflations, stents placed in saphenous vein graft conduits, and stents placed with high-pressure balloon inflations but without subsequent oral anticoagulants. Overall, subacute thrombosis was substantially higher in stents placed emergently (10.1%) compared to those placed electively (4.3%). Among contemporary trials employing high-pressure balloon inflations, the rate of stent thrombosis appears markedly lower (1.3%) despite reduced postprocedural anticoagulation. Taken together, these studies suggest factors associated with a heightened risk of stent thrombosis, many of which can be avoided with proper case selection and contemporary techniques.

Subacute occlusion, bleeding complications, hospital stay and restenosis after Palmaz-Schatz coronary stenting under a new antithrombotic regimen

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to evaluate the effect of an antithrombotic regimen without full early anticoagulation on subacute occlusion, bleeding, hospital stay and restenosis after elective coronary stenting.

BACKGROUND

Subacute occlusion is a major limitation of stenting. Aggressive antithrombotic therapy is not fully prophylactic against this complication, carries risk of bleeding, prolongs hospital stay and reduces cost-effectiveness.

METHODS

We studied 110 consecutive patients (121 lesions) who underwent elective Palmaz-Schatz stenting. Intravenous heparin was given only during the procedure. After stenting, patients took aspirin, dipyridamole, dextran, warfarin and low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin, 40 mg subcutaneously daily, stopped when an international normalized ratio of 2 to 3 was achieved). The first 52 patients (group A) underwent coronary angiography 24 h after stenting, and hospital stay was extended until an international normalized ratio of 2 to 3.5 was achieved. The remaining 58 patients (group B) were discharged 24 h after stenting. Clinical and angiographic follow-up were performed 1 and 6 months after stenting for all patients.

RESULTS

In group A the activated partial thromboplastin time remained normal (30 +/- 6.2 s [mean +/- SD]) during enoxaparin administration, and hospital stay was 9.1 +/- 4.3 days. In group B hospital stay was 27 +/- 8 h. No major cardiac events occurred within the first month in patients from both groups. At 1 and 30 days all stented lesions remained patent. Only two patients (1.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32% to 7%) developed bleeding. At 6 months, the restenosis rate was 22% (95% CI 15% to 30%).

CONCLUSIONS

After coronary stenting with optimal angiographic results, this new antithrombotic regimen prevented subacute stent occlusion and bleeding, with a brief hospital stay. No detrimental effect on the previously reported restenosis rate was observed.

Efficacy of angioscopy in determining the effectiveness of intracoronary urokinase and TEC atherectomy thrombus removal from an occluded saphenous vein graft prior to stent implantation

Percutaneous revascularization of thrombus containing saphenous vein grafts is associated with a high incidence of acute complications. This case report describes successful revascularization of an occluded vein graft employing angioscopically guided sequential urokinase infusion, TEC atherectomy and stent implantation.

Influence of expanded balloon diameter on Palmaz-Schatz stent recoil

After successful stent implantation, the residual luminal diameter of the stented vessel is usually smaller than the maximal stent-expanded balloon diameter. The goal of this study was to determine whether immediate vessel diameter recoil after Palmaz-Schatz stenting is affected by the final expanding balloon diameter used during stent deployment. Single Palmaz-Schatz balloon expandable stents were successfully placed in 108 stenotic lesions. There were 68 patients with 75 saphenous vein graft (SVG) and 30 patients with 33 native coronary artery lesions, including 26 restenotic and 82 de novo occlusive (> 50% diameter stenosis) lesions. Quantitative coronary angiography was used for the assessment of stent recoil, defined as the difference between the minimal diameter of the fully expanded balloon and the postprocedure minimal lumen diameter divided by minimal diameter of the fully expanded balloon. A strong correlation (r = 0.94) was found between the minimal diameter of the fully expanded balloon and poststenting minimal lumen diameter. Immediate recoil was 11.3 +/- 7.5%, responsible on an average for 0.4 +/- 0.2-mm acute lumen loss. Recoil was less in SVG than in coronary arteries (9.7 +/- 6.6% vs. 14.0 +/- 7.8%; P = 0.004, and 0.3 +/- 0.2 vs. 0.4 +/- 0.2 mm; p = 0.01). Lesions were divided into four subgroups, based on the final stent expanding balloon diameter: (1) < or = 3.0 mm (n = 33); (2) > 3 < or = 3.5 mm (n = 43); (3) > 3.5 < or = 4 mm (n = 23); and (4) > 4 mm (n = 9).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Immediate results and late outcomes after stent implantation in saphenous vein graft lesions: the multicenter U.S. Palmaz-Schatz stent experience. The Palmaz-Schatz Stent Study Group

OBJECTIVES

This study reports the multicenter registry experience evaluating the safety and efficacy of the Palmaz-Schatz stent in the treatment of saphenous vein graft disease.

BACKGROUND

Saphenous vein graft angioplasty is associated with frequent periprocedural complications and a high frequency of restenosis. Stent implantation has been shown to reduce restenosis, with improved long-term outcomes in the treatment of native coronary artery disease. Preliminary experience with stent placement in the treatment of saphenous vein graft lesions has been favorable.

METHODS

Twenty U.S. investigator sites enrolled a total of 589 symptomatic patients (624 lesions) for treatment of focal vein graft stenoses between January 1990 and April 1992. Follow-up angiography was performed at 6 months, and the clinical course of all study patients was prospectively collected at regular intervals for up to 12 months.

RESULTS

Stent delivery was successful in 98.8% of cases, and the procedural success rate was 97.1%. The lesion diameter stenosis decreased from 82 +/- 12% (mean +/- SD) before to 6.6 +/- 10.2% after treatment. Major in-hospital complications occurred in 17 patients (2.9%); stent thrombosis was found in 8 (1.4%); and major vascular or bleeding complications were noted in 83 (14.3%). Six-month angiographic follow-up revealed an overall restenosis rate (> or = 50% diameter stenosis) of 29.7%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that 1) restenotic lesions, 2) smaller reference vessel size, 3) history of diabetes mellitus, and 4) higher percent poststent diameter stenosis were independent predictors of restenosis. The 12-month actuarial event-free survival was 76.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Stent implantation in patients with focal saphenous vein graft lesions can be achieved with a high rate of procedural success, acceptable major complications, reduced angiographic restenosis and favorable late clinical outcome compared with historical balloon angioplasty control series. The rigorous anticoagulation regimen after stent placement results in more frequent vascular and other bleeding complications. Future randomized studies comparing standard balloon angioplasty with stent implantation are warranted to properly assess the full impact of stent placement in the treatment of saphenous vein graft lesions.

Predictors and sequelae of distal embolization during saphenous vein graft intervention from the CAVEAT-II trial. Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to identify the predictors and sequelae of distal embolization from a multicenter, randomized trial of saphenous vein graft intervention. The CAVEAT-II trial demonstrated that saphenous vein graft directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) was associated with greater angiographic success and less need for repeat intervention compared with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) but at the cost of more acute complications--notably distal embolization.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In CAVEAT-II, 305 patients were randomly assigned to DCA (149 patients) or PTCA (156 patients) for lesions with > 60% diameter stenosis in vein grafts > or = 3 mm in diameter. Distal embolization occurred in 20 patients (13.4%) assigned to DCA and 8 patients (5.1%) assigned to PTCA (P = .011). Independent predictors of distal embolization were use of DCA (71% in distal embolization patients versus 47% in patients without distal embolization, P = .011) and presence of thrombus (39% in distal embolization patients versus 14% in patients without distal embolization, P < .00). In-hospital adverse events were more frequent after distal embolization; 71% versus 20%, odds ratio plus (95% confidence intervals) 9.87 (4.65, 20.94). At 12-month follow-up, adverse event rates were also higher in patients with distal embolization (odds ratio, 3.05 [1.95, 4.76]).

CONCLUSIONS

In this first prospective multicenter trial of saphenous vein graft intervention, distal embolization was more common after DCA than PTCA and in lesions containing thrombus. It also was associated with worse in-hospital and 12-month outcomes. The risk and sequelae of distal embolization should be considered when choosing a treatment strategy for vein graft disease.