Integral membrane protein structure: transmembrane α-helices as autonomous folding domains

Specificity and promiscuity in membrane helix interactions

The membrane-spanning portions of many integral membrane proteins consist of one or a number of transmembrane α-helices, which are expected to be independently stable on thermodynamic grounds. Side-by-side interactions between these transmembrane α-helices are important in the folding and assembly of such integral membrane proteins and their complexes. In considering the contribution of these helix–helix interactions to membrane protein folding and oligomerization, a distinction between the energetics and specificity should be recognized. A number of contributions to the energetics of transmembrane helix association within the lipid bilayer will be relatively non-specific, including those resulting from charge–charge interactions and lipid–packing effects. Specificity (and part of the energy) in transmembrane α-helix association, however, appears to rely mainly upon a detailed stereochemical fit between sets of dynamically accessible states of particular helices. In some cases, these interactions are mediated in part by prosthetic groups.

Rotational orientation of transmembrane alpha-helices in bacteriorhodopsin. A neutron diffraction study

The rotational orientation of the seven transmembrane alpha-helices (A-G) in bacteriorhodopsin has been investigated by neutron diffraction. The current model of bacteriorhodopsin is based on an electron density map obtained by high-resolution electron microscopy (EM). Assigning helix rotational positions in the EM model depended on fitting large side-chains, mainly aromatic residues, into bulges in the electron density map. For helix D, which contains no aromatic residues, the EM map is more difficult to interpret. For helices A and B, whose position and orientation had been determined previously by neutron diffraction, the positions defined by EM agree within experimental error with these earlier conclusions. The orientation of all seven helices has been examined by using neutron diffraction on bacteriorhodopsin samples with specifically deuterated valine, leucine and tryptophan residues. Experimental peak intensities were compared to those predicted for an extensive set of structural models. The models were generated by (1) rotating all helices around their axis; (2) moving deuterated residues in the extramembrane loops about their probable positions and changing the weight of their contribution to the neutron diffraction pattern; (3) allowing deuterated side-chains to change their conformation. The analysis confirmed exactly the positions previously determined for helices A and B. For an optimal fit to the data to be obtained, the other five helices, including helix D, must lie either at or within 20 degrees of their position in the current EM model. The complementarity of medium-resolution EM, neutron diffraction and model building for the structural study of integral membrane proteins is discussed.

Prediction of the positioning of the seven transmembrane alpha-helices of bacteriorhodopsin. A molecular simulation study

We have applied a search strategy for determining the optimal packing of protein secondary structure elements to the rotational positioning of the seven transmembrane helices of bacteriorhodopsin. The search is based on the assumption that the relative orientations of the helices within the bundle are conditioned principally by inter-helix side-chain interactions and that the extra-helical parts of the protein have only a minor influence on the bundle conformation. Our approach performs conformational energy optimization using a predetermined set of side-chain rotamers and appropriate methods for sampling the conformational space of peptide fragments with fixed backbone geometries. The final solution obtained for bacteriorhodopsin places each of the seven helices to a precision of a few degrees in rotation around the helical axis and to a few tenths of an ångström in translation along the helical axis with respect to the best experimental structure obtained by electron diffraction, except for helix D, where our results support the suggestion that this helix should be displaced along its axis toward its N terminus. The perspectives of such an approach for the determination of the structures of other transmembrane helical bundles are discussed.

A dimerization motif for transmembrane alpha-helices

Specific helix-helix interactions inside lipid bilayers guide the folding and assembly of many integral membrane proteins and their complexes. We report here a pattern of 7 amino acids (LIxxGVxxGVxxT) which when introduced into several hydrophobic transmembrane alpha-helices promotes their specific dimerization. Dimerization is driven by interactions that are specific, dominated by the helix-helix interface, and involve no potentially ionizable groups. The motif may provide a useful tool for the functional analysis of such interactions in a variety of systems. Further, since this particular motif is rare, whilst specific helix association is not, many other such motifs may exist, which could permit sorting within complex membranes as well as guiding folding and oligomerization.

Polarity conserved positions in transmembrane domains of G-protein coupled receptors and bacteriorhodopsin

The polarity of residues at certain positions in the transmembrane domains of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) is found to be conserved, and to indicate the pattern of specific helix-helix packing of the helices. A concept of polarity conserved positions (PCP) is proposed to describe this conserved property, and is applied to obtain insight into the structural features of the transmembrane proteins. The common pattern of PCPs for GPCRs indicates that they share a similar packing arrangement of their transmembrane helix bundles. For proteins in the bacteriorhodopsin family the PCP pattern suggests a common packing arrangement that differs from that of GPCRs, in agreement with experimental data. This difference in the packing arrangement underscores the shortcomings of a BR template for the construction of molecular models of GPCRs.