Effectiveness of orthodontic treatment with functional appliances on mandibular growth in the short term

The ability of orthodontists and laypeople to discriminate mandibular stepwise advancements in a Class II retrognathic mandible

OBJECTIVES

This study analysed the ability of orthodontists and laypeople to discriminate mandibular stepwise advancements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four pictures (in duplicate) were taken of a male patient with Class II malocclusion and mandibular deficiency with the mandible positioned in habitual maximum intercuspation (HMI) and with stepwise advancements of 2mm, 4mm and 6mm. These images were examined by orthodontists (n=30) and laypeople (n=30). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to evaluate intra-examiner agreement. Intra-examiner ability to discriminate stepwise mandibular advancements was examined by Friedman's test. A Mann-Whitney's test was carried out to analyse score difference between orthodontists and laypeople. Type I error (alpha) was set as 5% for all statistical tests.

RESULTS

We observed a satisfactory to excellent level of methodological reliability. While laypeople were able to notice mandibular advancements ≥4 mm (p<0.05), orthodontists were able to observe mandibular advancements ≥2 mm (p<0.05). The orthodontists were more critical than laypeople with regard to the facial profile evaluation when facial convexity increased (p<0.001), but no significant difference was observed when the sagittal maxillo-mandibular relationship approached normality (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Considering that the mean sagittal mandibular growth due to the use of functional orthopaedic appliances is reported in the literature as 2mm, it seems that laypeople may not able to discriminate this amount of change in facial-profile attractiveness.

Effectiveness of bionator therapy for Class II malocclusions: a comparative long-term study

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this retrospective study was to examine the effectiveness of isolated bionator therapy in Class II patients both longitudinally and over the long term. We aimed to determine whether skeletal and/or dentoalveolar reactions differ in relationship to the Angle Class (II, Division 1 vs. II, Division 2).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 50 juvenile patients with Class II malocclusion (♀ n = 26, ♂ n = 24) were included. A total of 24 patients presented an Angle Class II, Division 1 and 26 an Angle Class II, Division 2. We compared the patients' lateral cephalograms taken at the beginning of treatment (t1: 10.1 years), after active therapy (t2: 13.8 years), and at the end of retention (t3: 16.4 years) analyzing the following cephalometric parameters: SNA, SNB, ANB, ANB(ind), SNPog, Wits appraisal, U1-SN, U1-SpP, L1-MeGo, interincisal angle. Mean and standard deviations of each of the variables were calculated. Differences between t1-t2 and t2-t3 were tested for statistical significance. Changes in the variables were then analyzed biometrically for specific differences in terms of Angle Class (II, Division 1 vs. II, Division 2).

RESULTS

Between t1 and t2, SNB (p = 0.000) and SNPog (p = 0.000) increased significantly, as did ANB (p = 0.000), while the difference between ANB and ANB(ind) (p = 0.000) and Wits appraisal (p = 0.000) decreased significantly. The dentoalveolar variables U1-SN, U1-SpP, and the interincisal angle changed significantly in both groups. The inclination of the upper incisors was corrected by retrusion in the Class II, Division 1 and by protrusion in the Class II, Division 2 group. Only marginal changes in all variables between t2 and t3 were observed.

CONCLUSION

A significant skeletal effect (even in long-time stability) through bionator treatment could be confirmed in this study of Class II, Divisions 1 and 2 patients. The desired effect on the upper front teeth was realized, and there was no appreciable dentoalveolar compensation in the mandible.