Analysis of pravastatin to prevent recurrence of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion

Is there a role for statins in atrial fibrillation?

3-Hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are some of the most commonly prescribed drugs in the world. While lipid modification remains the primary function of statins, there has been increasing interest in its potential pleiotropic effects, particularly as an anti-inflammatory agent in its role as an antiarrhythmic. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice and carries with it a significant burden in both morbidity and mortality. Treatment for AF currently involves either rate or rhythm control where both have demonstrable associated risks. Rate control necessitates anticoagulation, which can cause life-threatening bleeding, while rhythm control has a poor side-effect profile that may lead to greater mortality and may not completely eliminate the need for anticoagulation. Considering this pressing need for novel therapeutic interventions in AF, this long overdue systematic review explores the potential role of statins in the treatment and prevention of AF. Physicians, especially cardiologists, need to be aware of the host of currently available literature and, more importantly, need to be stimulated to generate discussion and formulate studies that will help debate the issues under the most erudite standards.

Upstream therapy of atrial fibrillation

Failure of current pharmacological therapy for atrial fibrillation in maintaining sinus rhythm may be due to structural atrial remodeling caused by inflammation and fibrosis. Upstream therapy that interferes in the structural remodeling process may be effective in maintaining sinus rhythm. This article reviews upstream therapy in atrial fibrillation. Various prospective and retrospective studies demonstrate that upstream therapy, consisting of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, statins, fish oils, glucocorticoids, or moderate physical activity, is associated with a reduced incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation (i.e., primary prevention) and with a reduced recurrence of atrial fibrillation (i.e., secondary prevention). Larger clinical trials are required to further elucidate the position of upstream therapy in the primary and secondary prevention of atrial fibrillation.

Pleiotropic effects of statins in atrial fibrillation patients: the evidence

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia in clinical practice. The understanding of the pathophysiology of AF has changed during the last several decades, and a significant role of inflammation and of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system has been postulated both experimentally and clinically. There is emerging evidence of an association between inflammation and AF, and mounting evidence links increased C-reactive protein levels not only to already existing AF but also to the risk of developing future AF. The beneficial effects of statins on AF have been reported in several studies. Several randomized clinical and large observational studies have shown similar result that show the beneficial effect of statins in AF. In clinical studies, statins were considered effective in preventing AF after electrical cardioversion, post-ablation, and after permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator insertion. The antiarrhythmic mechanisms of statins regarding AF prevention in patients with heart failure are still not clear. Perioperative statin use has been associated with favorable postoperative outcome in both cardiovascular and noncardiovascular conditions. Despite a growing body of evidence that drugs with anti-inflammatory properties such as statins may prevent AF, the observed positive effects of statins on the burden of AF appeared to be independent of their cholesterol-reducing properties. However, further data from large-scale randomized trials are clearly needed.

Statin use is associated with lower risk of atrial fibrillation in women with coronary disease: the HERS trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of statin treatment in atrial fibrillation (AF) prevention in women.

DESIGN

Cohort study using data obtained in the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS).

SETTING

Secondary analysis of a multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trial.

PATIENTS

2673 Postmenopausal women with coronary disease.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

AF prevalence at baseline and incident AF over a mean follow-up of 4.1 years.

RESULTS

88 Women with AF were identified: 29 at baseline and 59 during follow-up. Women with AF were significantly less likely to be taking a statin at study enrollment than those without AF (22% vs 37%, p = 0.003). Baseline statin use was associated with a 65% lower odds of having AF at baseline after controlling for age, race, history of myocardial infarction or revascularisation and history of heart failure (odds ratio 0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13 to 0.93, p = 0.04). The risk of developing AF during the study among those free from AF at baseline, adjusted for the same covariates, was 55% less for those receiving statin treatment (hazard ratio 0.45, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.78, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Statin treatment is associated with a lower prevalence and incidence of AF after adjustment for potential confounders in postmenopausal women with coronary disease.

The role of infection in the development of non-valvular atrial fibrillation: up-regulation of Toll-like receptor 2 expression levels on monocytes

Many studies have suggested that inflammation may participate in the pathogenesis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it has been unknown by exposure to what the inflammation is caused. Recently, we reported that Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) level on monocytes was significantly up-regulated in viral and bacterial infections, but not in non-infectious inflammatory states. Our purpose was to test the hypothesis that expression of TLR2 levels may be up-regulated in patients with non-valvular AF. A total of 48 consecutive patients with non-valvular AF who were hospitalized for catheter ablation were enrolled in this study. TLR2 levels were assayed by using flow-cytometric analysis and compared with volunteers in sinus rhythm (control group, n = 24). Additionally, C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels were assayed, and the left atrial volume indexes (LAVI) in the non-valvular AF group were measured. The results demonstrated that TLR2 levels in the non-valvular AF group were significantly higher than in the control group (median, 4682 vs. 3866 sites/cell; P < 0.01). Moreover, non-valvular AF patients had significantly higher IL-6 levels than controls. However, there was no significant difference in CRP levels between the two groups. It was observed in 44 AF patients, in whom pulmonary vein isolation was confirmed to be successful, that the LAVI significantly diminished 1 month after ablation (median, 33.6 vs. 29.5 ml/m²; P < 0.001), but not the TLR2 and IL-6 levels. Our results implied that an infectious inflammation may participate in the pathogenesis of non-valvular AF.

The impact of statin use on atrial fibrillation

The aim of the present systematic review is to present an overview of the evidence linking atrial fibrillation (AF), inflammation and oxidative stress, with emphasis on the potential of statins to decrease the incidence of different types of AF, including new-onset AF, after electrical cardioversion (EC) and after cardiac surgery. Observational and clinical trials have studied the impact of statin therapy on new-onset, post-EC or postoperative AF. Data from different observational trials have shown that treatment with statins significantly reduces the incidence of new-onset AF in the primary and secondary prevention. The data are insufficient to recommend the use of statins before EC. Finally, perioperative statin therapy may represent an important non-antiarrhythmic adjunctive therapeutic strategy for the prevention of postoperative AF.

Relation of atrial fibrillation to glomerular filtration rate

Although both atrial fibrillation (AF) and decreasing glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are strongly related to advanced age and share common associated vascular risk factors, few studies have explored the relation between AF and GFR. From residents (age >or=40 years) in Kurashiki City, a total of 41,417 subjects (median age 72 years; 13,956 men) were enrolled in the Kurashiki City Annual Medical Survey from May to December 2006. The estimated overall prevalence of AF was 1.6% (2.8% in the low-GFR tertile, 1.2% in the middle tertile, and 0.9% in the high tertile, p <0.001). After all subjects were categorized into age tertiles (age thresholds 68 and 76 years), AF was identified in 0.9% in the low-GFR tertile, 0.6% in the middle tertile, and 0.5% in the high tertile in the low-age tertile (p = 0.018); 2.6% in the low-GFR tertile, 1.2% in the middle tertile, and 1.1% in the high tertile in the middle-age tertile (p <0.001); and 3.9% in the low-GFR tertile, 2.4% in the middle tertile, and 1.7% in the high tertile in the high-age tertile (p <0.001). The odds ratio for AF adjusted for age, gender, vascular risk factors, cardiac disease, and hemoglobin was 1.91 (95% confidence interval 1.54 to 2.38, p <0.001) for the low-GFR tertile versus the high tertile and 1.12 (95% confidence interval 0.88 to 1.42, p = 0.364) for the middle-GFR tertile versus the high tertile. The prevalence of AF gradually increased with decreasing GFR. In conclusion, AF appears to be associated with decreasing GFR.

New horizons in antiarrhythmic therapy: will novel agents overcome current deficits?

Pharmacologic antiarrhythmic therapy is the most commonly used treatment in most patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but currently available agents are limited by risks that may offset the benefits of sinus rhythm. The development of antiarrhythmic agents with the potential for fewer adverse ventricular effects and less extracardiac toxicity is a primary aim of current investigations. At present, pharmacologic research is actively focused on developing antiarrhythmic agents with multiple or novel ion channel effects. There are 4 agents that act by simultaneously blocking multiple ion channels that are currently under regulatory review: azimilide dihydrochloride, tedisamil, dronedarone, and vernakalant (RSD-1235). In addition, agents with mechanisms of action that differ from those of existing agents (eg, gap junction modulators) are under review, as is the use of nonantiarrhythmic agents (eg, renin-angiotensin system antagonists, statins, n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids) to alter the cardiac substrate and suppress AF in some patient subtypes.

Dose-related effect of statins on atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common heart rhythm abnormality after cardiac surgery. It increases morbidity and prolongs hospital stay. A role for statins in the prevention of AF has been suggested. We hypothesized that the incidence of postoperative AF due to statin therapy is dose-related.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 680 consecutive patients undergoing coronary bypass graft surgery and/or aortic valve replacement was done. Excluded were 57 patients (8.4%) with history of AF, permanent pacemakers, and those receiving antiarrhythmic medication. Preoperative statin treatment and occurrence of postoperative AF were examined using propensity score matching to adjust for differences in patient characteristics between the statin and no-statin groups.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 623 patients. The statin group had a 27.1% incidence of postoperative AF vs 38.3% in the no-statin group (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.24 to 3.24; p = 0.004). Simvastatin (40 mg) and atorvastatin (40 mg) demonstrated the greatest effect on postoperative AF at 15.6% and 21.2%, respectively, vs no statins (respective adjusted ORs, 3.89 [p < 0.0001] and 2.76 [p = 0.012]). Intermediate-dose (20 mg) statins were also effective against AF, at 24.4% for simvastatin (adjusted OR, 2.32; p = 0.004) and 26.4% for atorvastatin (adjusted OR, 1.99, p = 0.047). Low-dose statins, simvastatin or atorvastatin (10 mg), did not influence postoperative AF.

CONCLUSIONS

Statin treatment may reduce the incidence of AF after cardiac surgery. Higher-dose statins have the greatest preventative effect, whereas low-dose statins do not influence postoperative AF.

Non-antiarrhythmic medications for atrial fibrillation: from bench to clinical practice

Many treatment modalities have been developed over the years for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). While they are still considered the first line of treatment for suppression of AF, antiarrhythmics often lead to treatment failure, complications and undesired consequences. Pulmonary vein ablation is an invasive procedure which is not always curative. Recently, there have been a variety of studies reporting the potential antiarrhythmic effects of various nonantiarrhythmic agents. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the findings reported thus far about the antiarrhythmic effects of agents which are not antiarrhythmic drugs themselves, but which have been found to offer promise in the prevention and treatment of AF.

Prevention of atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery: basis for a novel therapeutic strategy based on non-hypoxic myocardial preconditioning

Atrial fibrillation is the most common complication of cardiac surgical procedures performed with cardiopulmonary bypass. It contributes to increased hospital length of stay and treatment costs. At present, preventive strategies offer only suboptimal benefits, despite improvements in anesthesia, surgical technique, and medical therapy. The pathogenesis of postoperative atrial fibrillation is considered to be multifactorial. However oxidative stress is a major contributory factor representing the unavoidable consequences of ischemia/reperfusion cycle occurring in this setting. Considerable evidence suggests the involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the pathogenic mechanism of this arrhythmia. Interestingly, the deleterious consequences of high ROS exposure, such as inflammation, cell death (apoptosis/necrosis) or fibrosis, may be abrogated by a myocardial preconditioning process caused by previous exposure to moderate ROS concentration known to trigger survival response mechanisms. The latter condition may be created by n-3 PUFA supplementation that could give rise to an adaptive response characterized by increased expression of myocardial antioxidant enzymes and/or anti-apoptotic pathways. In addition, a further reinforcement of myocardial antioxidant defenses could be obtained through vitamins C and E supplementation, an intervention also known to diminish enzymatic ROS production. Based on this paradigm, this review presents clinical and experimental evidence supporting the pathophysiological and molecular basis for a novel therapeutic approach aimed to diminish the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation through a non-hypoxic preconditioning plus a reinforcement of the antioxidant defense system in the myocardial tissue.

Effect of statin dose on incidence of atrial fibrillation: data from the Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 22 (PROVE IT-TIMI 22) and Aggrastat to Zocor (A to Z) trials

BACKGROUND

Inflammation has been suggested as a factor in the initiation and maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF). Several observational studies have suggested that statins, presumably through their anti-inflammatory properties, decrease the risk of AF.

METHODS

We analyzed 2 large, randomized trials, PROVE IT-TIMI 22 and phase Z of the A to Z trial, which compared lower- versus higher-intensity statin therapy to evaluate whether higher-intensity statin therapy lowered the risk of AF onset during the 2 years of follow-up. We hypothesized that higher-intensity statin therapy would decrease the risk of AF when compared to lower-intensity statin therapy. From each trial, patients experiencing the onset of AF during follow-up were identified from the adverse event reports.

RESULTS

Neither study showed a decreased AF risk with higher-dose statin. In PROVE IT-TIMI 22, 2.9% versus 3.3% in the high- versus standard-dose statin therapy, respectively, experienced the onset of AF over 2 years (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.61-1.23, P = .41). In A to Z, rates were 1.6% versus 0.99%, respectively (OR 1.58, 95% CI 0.92-2.70, P = .096). In both trials, C-reactive protein levels (plasma or serum) tended to be higher among patients experiencing the onset of AF.

CONCLUSION

Our randomized comparison among 8659 patients found that higher-dose statin therapy did not reduce the short term incidence of AF among patients after acute coronary syndromes when compared with standard dose statin treatment.

Potential Use of Statins to Prevent Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Objective:

To review the published literature evaluating the effectiveness of statin therapy for preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery,

Data Sources:

A MEDLINE search was performed (1950–October 2007) using the search terms statins, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, coronary artery bypass graft, cardiac surgery, and atrial fibrillation,

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

All articles published in English describing or evaluating the use of statins in humans to prevent atrial fibrillation (AF) were included. Additional pertinent articles were identified from reference lists.

Data Synthesis:

POAF is a common complication following CABG surgery that is associated with significant morbidity. Current preventive strategies include the use of β-blockers and antiarrhythmic drugs such as amiodarono and Sotalol. Accumulating evidence suggests that statins may also reduce the risk of POAF. Numerous studies in nonsurgical cardiovascular patients have found reduced rates of AF with statins. In patients who have undergone CABG, several observational studies have also documented benefit. One randomized controlled trial reported a significant reduction in the risk of POAF and reduced length of hospital stay in patients given preoperative atorvastatin beginning 7 days before surgery. Ongoing research suggests that statins may reduce the risk of AF through pleiotropic effects independent of cholesterol lowering such as reductions in inflammation, oxidative damage, neurohormonal activation, and thrombosis.

Conclusions:

While the current evidence evaluating the use of statins to prevent POAF is encouraging, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn. However, because statins are widely used in cardiac patients for other indications and are not associated with the risks inherent to antiarrhythmic drugs, their value as an adjunct to current preventive strategies (or POAF deserves further study. Additional research is needed to examine the effectiveness of statins in risk-stratified patients undergoing CABG surgery and the impact on patient outcomes and attributed costs.

Atrial fibrillation: insights from clinical trials and novel treatment options

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common encountered sustained arrhythmia in clinical practice. The last decade the result of large 'rate' versus 'rhythm' control trials have been published that have changed the current day practise of AF treatment. It has become clear that rate control is at least equally effective as a rhythm control strategy in ameliorating morbidity as well as mortality. Moreover, in each individual patient the risk of thromboembolic events should be assessed and antithrombotic treatment be initiated. There have also been great advances in understanding the mechanisms of AF. Experimental studies showed that as a result of electrical and structural remodelling of the atria, 'AF begets AF'. Pharmacological prevention of atrial electrical remodelling has been troublesome, but it seems that blockers of the renin angiotensin system, and perhaps statins, may reduce atrial structural remodelling by preventing atrial fibrosis. Clinical studies demonstrated that the pulmonary veins exhibit foci that can act as initiator and perpetuator of the arrhythmia. Isolation of the pulmonary veins using radiofrequency catheter ablation usually abolishes AF. The most promising advances in the pharmacological treatment of AF include atrial specific antiarrhythmic drugs and direct thrombin inhibitors. In the present review we will describe the results of recent experimental studies, discuss the latest clinical trials, and we will focus on novel treatment modalities.

Effects of statin therapy on preventing atrial fibrillation in coronary disease and heart failure

BACKGROUND

Statins are associated with decreased incidence of life-threatening arrhythmias in patients with cardiomyopathy and reduce death and hospitalization in congestive heart failure (CHF). We hypothesized that statin use will reduce incident atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), including those with CHF.

METHODS

A cohort of 17,741 patients with CHD examined between 1994 and 1997 at 5 Veterans Affairs medical facilities was assembled. Patients with known AF, warfarin treatment, liver disease, or no follow-up visits were excluded. The final cohort included 13,783 patients. The primary outcome was time to development of AF. Propensity scores were used to balance statin-treated and untreated patients with respect to baseline characteristics. Time from the initial visit to development of AF was analyzed with a Cox regression model, using statin treatment as a time-varying covariate.

RESULTS

Among the 13,783 patients, 5417 (39%) received statin treatment. Statin-treated patients were younger with fewer comorbid conditions. After propensity adjustment, the baseline characteristics of the statin-treated and untreated patients were similar. During an average follow-up of 4.8 years, 1979 (14%) patients developed AF. In the overall study population there was no difference in AF incidence with statin treatment (hazard ratio 1.0, 95% CI 0.88-1.14, P = .9). However, AF was less common among statin-treated patients with CHF (hazard ratio 0.57, 95% CI 0.33-1.00, P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find any effect of statin treatment on AF incidence in patients with CHD; however, AF was reduced in a subset of patients with CHF.

Role of inflammation in initiation and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of the published data

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice. Recent studies have indicated that inflammation might play a significant role in the initiation, maintenance, and perpetuation of AF. Inflammatory markers such as interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein are elevated in AF and correlate to longer duration of AF, success of cardioversion, and thrombogenesis. Furthermore, the inflammatory process might be modulated by the use of statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, or glucocorticoids. The purpose of this study is to analyze the current published reports on the relationship between inflammation and AF and the potential therapeutic options available to modulate the inflammatory milieu in AF.

Statin use and recurrence of atrial fibrillation after successful cardioversion

BACKGROUND

Statins have important pleiotropic effects and have been shown to reduce vascular inflammation and the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after cardiac surgery. The role of statins in patients with existing AF is poorly understood. We examined the effect of statins on recurrence of AF in patients after successful cardioversion.

METHODS

Statin use and documented recurrence of AF after successful cardioversion were evaluated in 625 patients with new onset AF who were followed prospectively in the Canadian Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. Logistic regression was used to model the effect of statin use on the recurrence of AF at 1 year while adjusting for potential confounders including concurrent medications.

RESULTS

In a predominantly male population (62%) with median age 63 years, 12.3% were on statins at baseline. Overall, 32.5% had documented recurrence of AF at 1 year; 23.4% in patients on statins compared to 33.8% in those not on statins (P = .07). After adjustment for baseline differences and concomitant beta-blocker use, statin use was associated with a 74% reduction in AF recurrence, but only in statin users on beta-blockers (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.10-0.66); statin users not on beta-blockers (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.44-2.58).

CONCLUSIONS

In an observational study of patients with new onset AF, statin use was associated with a significant 74% reduction in the odds of recurrent AF, but only in patients also taking beta-blockers. Importantly, statin without concomitant beta-blocker use was not associated with any changes in AF recurrence.

The relationship between statin use and atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between statin therapy and the development of new-onset, recurrent, and postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted through September 2006. Included studies were either randomized, controlled trials or observational studies with adjusted analyses using multivariate regression or covariate matching, compared patients receiving or not receiving a statin, and reported data on the incidence of AF. Weighted averages were reported as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measured was a combined endpoint of any AF type. Secondary outcomes included new-onset, recurrent, and postoperative AF.

RESULTS

Fourteen trials reporting the results of 15 unique analyses (n = 7402) were included. There was a 20% incidence rate for any AF with varying rates depending on AF type (new-onset [11%], recurrent [56%], recurrent after cardioversion [54%], postoperative [22%]). The use of a statin reduced the odds of developing any AF by 45% (odds ratio [OR] 0.55; 95% CI 0.43-0.70); Q statistic p = 0.001). Statins reduced the odds of developing new-onset AF by 32% (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.51-0.90), recurrent AF by 57% (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.24-0.79), recurrent AF after cardioversion by 42% (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.32-1.05) and postoperative AF by 58% (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.27-0.65).

LIMITATIONS

We considered studies that were observational in nature or only available in abstract form. Publication bias could not be ruled out.

CONCLUSIONS

Statin therapy was associated with a reduced odds of developing AF, thus providing evidence of the benefit of statins beyond the lipid-lowering activity.

The role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice representing a major health hazard. Owing to relative inefficacy and side effects of classic antiarrhythmic drugs, current interest has shifted to treatments that target AF substrate. Accumulating evidence suggests that there is a link between oxidative processes and AF. In atrial myocardium during AF, there is substantial oxidative damage that may contribute to atrial remodeling. Several pathophysiological changes that possibly associated with increased oxidative stress in AF have been proposed. These include changes in gene transcriptional profiles and mitochondrial DNA, increased activity of enzymes such as NAD(P)H oxidase and xanthine oxidase, inflammatory processes, activation of the renin-angiotensin system and others. Moreover, oxidative stress is involved in the pathophysiology of several predisposing factors and cardiovascular disorders that correspondingly associated with AF. Preliminary studies using dietary antioxidants such as vitamin C have shown promising results. More evidence has been obtained from studies examining agents with pleiotropic effects, including antioxidant, such as inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system, statins, corticosteroids and carvedilol. Further investigations are needed in order to elucidate the impact of oxidative stress on atrial remodeling. The clarification of these processes in the setting of AF may lead to the development of novel therapeutic strategies.

Therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, and statins: no effect on ablation outcome after ablation of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and inflammation are supposed to play a key role in the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation (AF). This retrospective clinical study was intended to assess the influence of drugs with antiinflammatory and/or renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system-modulating properties, namely angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), and statins, on AF-free survival after AF ablation.

METHODS

The study included 234 patients (23-80 years; 71.8% men) with drug-resistant paroxysmal (n = 165) or persistent AF (n = 69) who either underwent a Lasso-guided segmental pulmonary vein isolation (n = 83) or a CARTO-guided left atrial circumferential ablation (n = 151). Treatment with statins (n = 113), ACE-Is, or ARBs (n = 124), or a combination of a statin and an ACE-I or ARB (n = 75) was started >3 months before ablation and was continued during follow-up.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 12.7 months, 64% of patients with paroxysmal and 45% of patients with persistent AF were free of AF. Statin use (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; P = .79), ACE-I or ARB use (HR, 1.12; P = .59), and their combined use (statin + ACE-I/ARB; HR, 1.17; P = .54) did not significantly influence ablation outcome as assessed by Cox regression analysis. In addition, after multivariate adjustment for potential confounders, the examined drugs did not significantly affect ablation outcome. Ablation induced an acute up-regulation of C-reactive protein levels (preablation vs 48 hours postablation, 5.9 +/- 8.1 vs 33.7 +/- 30 mg/L; P < .001) and other inflammatory markers. The examined drugs did not significantly alter baseline levels or ablation-induced up-regulation of inflammatory markers.

CONCLUSIONS

The routine use of statins, ACE-Is, or ARBs did not result in an improved outcome of AF ablation.

Lipid-lowering therapy with statins, a new approach to antiarrhythmic therapy

Inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase (statins) are the most effective and best-tolerated drugs to treat elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). In addition, they exhibit other effects unrelated to their lipid lowering effects (pleiotropic actions). In recent years, experimental and clinical evidence demonstrates that statins exert antiarrhythmic properties, reducing the recurrences of supraventricular and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias both in patients with and without coronary artery disease (CAD). Thus, statins may constitute a novel therapeutic approach to cardiac arrhythmias. This article reviews the antiarrhythmic properties of statins as well as the possible mechanisms involved, including the lowering of LDL-C levels, the improvement of endothelial dysfunction and autonomic function, the stabilization of the atherosclerotic plaques, the antioxidant, antiinflammatory, antithrombotic and cardioprotective properties and the modulation of transmembrane ion fluxes.

Optimising stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Pooled data from trials comparing antithrombotic treatment with placebo have shown that warfarin reduces the risk of stroke by 62%, and that aspirin alone reduces the risk by 22%. Overall, in high-risk patients, warfarin is superior to aspirin in preventing strokes, with a relative risk reduction of 36%. Ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, was found to be as efficient as vitamin K antagonist drugs in the prevention of embolic events, but has been recently withdrawn because of abnormal liver function tests. The ACTIVE-W (Atrial Fibrillation Clopidogrel Trial with Irbesartan for Prevention of Vascular Events) study has demonstrated that warfarin is superior to platelet therapy (clopidogrel plus aspirin) in the prevention af embolic events. Idraparinux, a Factor Xa inhibitor, is being evaluated in patients with atrial fibrillation. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor-blocking drugs hold promise in atrial fibrillation through cardiac remodelling. Preliminary studies suggest that statins could interfere with the risk of recurrence after electrical cardioversion. Finally, percutaneous methods for the exclusion of left atrial appendage are under investigation in high-risk patients.

Association of statin therapy and the risk of atrial fibrillation in patients with a permanent pacemaker

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown conflicting results regarding a protective effect of statin therapy on atrial fibrillation (AF).

HYPOTHESIS

We sought to determine whether statins are effective in reducing the risk of developing arrhythmia in a cohort of 264 patients (49% women, mean age [+/-standard deviation] 71 [+/-12] years) with permanent pacemakers who are at high risk for AF.

METHODS

All patients who underwent implantation of a permanent pacemaker over a 3-year period were eligible for inclusion in the study. We excluded patients with AF at implantation, incomplete medication information, or less than a yearly follow-up visit. Atrial fibrillation was diagnosed by ECG documentation, pacemaker interrogation, and Holter monitoring. Statin treatment was verified through a central pharmacy-computerized database (for most patients) or by chart review. Of the 264 patients, 36% had coronary artery disease.

RESULTS

Atrial fibrillation developed in 70 patients (26%) at a median of 359 days post pacemaker implantation. The incidence rate for the first occurrence of AF post pacemaker implantation among patients treated and not treated with statins was 10.5 versus 9.8 events per 100 patient-years, respectively (p = 0.81). Even after controlling for baseline differences, the hazard ratio (HR) for developing AF among statin users did not achieve statistical significance (HR = 0.59 [0.31-1.12]).

CONCLUSIONS

We could not demonstrate that statin therapy had a protective effect against the risk of AF in patients implanted with a permanent pacemaker. The low prevalence of coronary artery disease in our patients may partly explain our results.

Future directions in antiarrhythmic drug therapy for atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is the most commonly sustained cardiac arrhythmia. Drugs currently approved by the US FDA for the treatment of this arrhythmia are imperfect owing to either side effects or limited efficacy. Drug development strategies have focused on two areas: the modification of existing agents – such as Class III drugs aimed at improving their safety and efficacy profile – and targeting newly postulated mechanisms of atrial fibrillation. In this article, we review new drugs currently in development and promising drug strategies for atrial fibrillation prevention and treatment.

Effect of atorvastatin on the recurrence rates of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion

To study the effect of atorvastatin on recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after electrical cardioversion (EC), 48 patients with AF lasting 48 hours who were scheduled for EC were randomized to the atorvastatin (group I) and control (group II) groups. Six patients in group I (25%) and 2 patients in group II (8.3%) had spontaneous conversion before EC (p >0.05). The end point was the recurrence of AF during 3 months of follow-up. Eighteen patients in group I (12.5%) and 11 patients in group II (45.8%) had recurrence (p = 0.01, log-rank test). With the Cox proportional model, the predictors of recurrence included a body mass index of 25 to 30 kg/m2 (relative risk [RR] 0.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.008 to 0.59), body mass index > or = 30 kg/m2 (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.72), AF duration of > or = 3 months (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.83), diabetes mellitus (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.98), and left atrial diameter of > or = 45 mm (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.74). Atorvastatin was associated with a significantly reduced risk of developing AF (unadjusted RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.064 to 0.82, p = 0.024). This association remained significant after adjustment for these predictors (adjusted RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.052 to 0.72, p = 0.01). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels at baseline were not different between the 2 groups (p = 0.92). Although the high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels decreased significantly 48 hours after EC compared with the baseline levels in group I (2.82 +/- 1.46 vs 2.56 +/- 1.3 mg/dl, p = 0.02), no significant change occurred in group II (2.87 +/- 0.8 vs 2.84 +/- 0.8 mg/dl, p = 0.09). In conclusion, atorvastatin decreased the recurrence rate of AF after EC.

Lipid-lowering drug use is associated with reduced prevalence of atrial fibrillation in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Inflammation and oxidative stress have been implicated in the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation (AF). Lipid-lowering drugs, particularly statins and fibrates, possess anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of lipid-lowering drug use on AF prevalence in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

METHODS

Data were obtained from ADVANCENT(SM), a multicenter registry of patients with reduced LVEF (<or=40%). Demographic, clinical, and echocardiographic parameters were collected from interviews and medical records. Medications, including lipid-lowering drugs, were recorded.

RESULTS

Of the 25,268 patients, 71.3% had hyperlipidemia, and 66.8% were prescribed lipid-lowering drugs. AF prevalence was 25.1% in patients taking lipid-lowering drugs compared with 32.6% in untreated hyperlipidemic patients and 32.8% in patients without hyperlipidemia (P <.001 for both comparisons). In multivariable analysis, lipid-lowering drug use remained significantly associated with reduced odds of AF (odds ratio [OR] 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-0.74), and this effect was larger than that of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.92) or beta-blockers (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.88-1.02). The beneficial impact of lipid-lowering drugs on AF risk was independent of their effects on the lipid profile. In patients in whom data on specific lipid-lowering drugs were available, 92% of the patients undergoing lipid-lowering therapy received statins, and 98% received statins and/or fibrates.

CONCLUSION

Use of lipid-lowering drugs in patients with reduced LVEF is associated with a significant reduction in the prevalence of AF independent of the lipid profile and other known arrhythmia risk factors. This effect is larger than that of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers or beta-blockers and may be the result of the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of statins and fibrates.

High sensitivity C-reactive protein: a novel predictor for recurrence of atrial fibrillation after successful cardioversion

OBJECTIVES

We sought to test the hypothesis that C-reactive protein (CRP) can predict the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after successful electrical cardioversion (CV).

BACKGROUND

In patients with AF, CRP levels are predictive of immediate failure of CV.

METHODS

We prospectively measured high-sensitivity CRP in 67 patients with AF or atrial flutter who underwent successful electrical CV.

RESULTS

At one-month follow-up, 22 patients (33%) had recurrence of their arrhythmia. Arrhythmia recurrence was associated with significantly higher pre-CV CRP levels (odds ratio [OR] 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14 to 2.98; p = 0.013) even after adjusting for age (OR 2.22; 95% CI 1.25 to 3.93; p = 0.006), for gender (OR 1.89; 95% CI 1.16 to 3.09; p = 0.011), or duration of arrhythmia (OR 1.86; 95% CI 1.13 to 3.07; p = 0.015). On multivariate analysis, CRP was the only independent predictor of arrhythmia recurrence (OR 2.19; 95% CI 1.05 to 4.55; p = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that high levels of CRP are associated with an increased risk of recurrence of AF within one month. These data support the hypothesis that anti-inflammatory interventions may help in maintenance of normal sinus rhythm after CV. These data also may have implications for the identification of patients who are most likely to experience substantial benefit from CV therapy for AF.

[Preventing cerebrovascular accidents during atrial fibrillation]

Atrial fibrillation, the most commonly encountered arrhythmia in clinical practice, is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Its incidence and prevalence are increasing, and it represents a growing clinical and economic burden. Recent research has highlighted new approaches to both pharmacological and non-pharmacological management. Pooled data from trials comparing antithrombotic treatment with placebo show that warfarin reduces the risk of stroke by 62% and that aspirin alone reduces the risk by 22%. Overall, in high-risk patients, warfarin was better than aspirin in preventing strokes, with a relative risk reduction of 36%, but the risk of major hemorrhage with warfarin was twice that with aspirin. Anticoagulation treatment needs to be tailored individually for patients on the basis of age, comorbidities, and contraindications. However, warfarin remains under-prescribed in clinical practice, for reasons related to patients (comorbidities) and physicians. The limitations of warfarin treatment have prompted the development of new anticoagulants with predictable pharmacokinetics that do not require as frequent monitoring. Ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, was compared with warfarin in the SPORTIF program, which found both agents to be broadly effective in the prevention of embolic events, but observed abnormal liver function tests in 6% of patients on ximelagatran. Liver function monitoring during treatment is thus needed. Idraparinux, a factor Xa inhibitor administered by once weekly subcutaneous injections, is being evaluated in patients with atrial fibrillation. The ACTIVE trial is currently assessing the role of aspirin plus clopidogrel, compared with adjusted dose warfarin, in the prevention of vascular events in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor-blocking drugs interfere with atrial remodeling and show promise in atrial fibrillation, as suggested in the LIFE trial. Preliminary studies suggest that statins may reduce the risk of recurrence after electrical cardioversion. Finally, percutaneous methods for occlusion of the left atrial appendage are currently under investigation in patients at high risk of thromboembolism but with contraindications for chronic warfarin.

Is atrial fibrillation an inflammatory disorder?

There is mounting evidence to support the influence of inflammation in the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation (AF). Indeed, AF is associated with increased levels of known inflammatory markers, even after adjustment for confounding factors. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) appears to play a key role in this process. Atrial biopsies from patients with AF have also confirmed the presence of inflammation. Furthermore, there is preliminary evidence to support a number of drug therapies that have the potential to reduce the clinical burden of AF. In this review, we present an overview of the evidence supporting a link between inflammation and AF, and some of the drug therapies, such as the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, steroids, fish oils, and vitamin C, that might be efficacious in the prevention of AF by modulating inflammatory pathways.

Targeting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system in atrial fibrillation: a shift from electrical to structural therapy?

Despite its increasing incidence and prevalence, treatment options in atrial fibrillation (AF) are far from ideal and often limited. After decades of focus on the electrical aspects of AF with unsatisfactory results, recent research is focusing increasingly on the atrial structural remodelling that underlies the development of AF in different pathological conditions, such as hypertension, heart failure, diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the role of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system in AF and to highlight the clinical evidence on renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system blockade as a therapeutic option in AF.

Treatment and prevention of atrial fibrillation with nonantiarrhythmic pharmacologic therapy

Atrial fibrillation is one of the most frequent heart rhythm disturbances found in clinical practice. Anticoagulation, rate control, cardioversion, and ablative procedures have been the mainstay of treatment. The frequent recurrence of atrial fibrillation and the side effects when antiarrhythmic drugs are used have led to dissatisfaction with available treatment of this arrhythmia. Pharmacologic therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, statins, and perhaps aldosterone and calcium channel blockers may have a role in the prevention of atrial fibrillation onset and recurrence. We summarize the possible biologic mechanisms and the clinical observations supporting the use of non-antiarrhythmic medications in the prevention of atrial fibrillation.