The importance of blood pressure control in the patient with diabetes

Ethnic Differences in the Treatment and Control of Hypertension in Patients With Diabetes

Among diabetic hypertensive patients, ethnic differences in blood pressure control and outcomes have been attributed in part to greater reluctance of providers to prescribe combination antihypertensive regimens to African Americans than to Caucasians. African Americans purportedly receive fewer angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and/or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), which reduce target organ complications. To assess these issues, cross-sectional data were analyzed from 19,864 diabetic hypertensives from 62 primary care clinics. Among diabetic hypertensives, African Americans (N=6230) were less likely than Caucasians (N=8041) to have blood pressure (BP) <130/80 mm Hg at their last clinic visit (23.1% [23.0%-23.2%] vs. 30.7% [30.6%-30.9%]) despite a greater number of prescriptions for antihypertensive medications (2.67 [2.63-2.70] vs. 2.23 [2.20-2.26]). African Americans were more likely than Caucasians to have an ACEI and/or ARB prescribed and to receive prescriptions for at least two antihypertensive medications that included an ACEI or ARB (64.1% [63.8%-64.4%] vs. 53.1% [52.8%-53.4%]). Among diabetic hypertensives, African Americans are less likely than Caucasians to attain BP <130/80 mm Hg, despite receiving more antihypertensive medication prescriptions. African Americans receive more ACEIs and/or ARBs than Caucasians for target organ protection and/or BP control. The data suggest provider prescribing patterns are not a major contributor to ethnic differences in BP control and outcomes in diabetic hypertensives.

[Knowledge and implementation of cardiovascular risk clinical practice guidelines by general practitioners and specialists]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Patients at a high risk of cardiovascular disease rarely achieve the preventive targets stipulated by the clinical practice guidelines published by professional bodies. The aims of the ACORISC registry were to determine the level of compliance with guidelines on prevention by general practitioners and specialists and to assess the findings in terms of risk factors.

METHODS

The study included 5849 consecutive patients (mean age 65 years) with type 2 diabetes or chronic ischemic heart disease who were seen as outpatients. In addition, 384 participating physicians were questioned on their knowledge and use of practice guidelines.

RESULTS

Overall, 91% of patients also had hypertension. Physicians tended to have better knowledge of and to implement guidelines published by the closest related professional bodies. Some 14% of treatment provided was inappropriate, half of which involved oral antidiabetics. Conversely, 48% of patients for whom guidelines recommended an angiotensin inhibitor did not receive one. The target figures for blood pressure, body mass index, and cholesterol were achieved in only 13%, 21% and 39% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, 75% of risk factors in patients with diabetes or chronic ischemic heart disease were not appropriately treated by general practitioners or specialists in accordance with current clinical practice guidelines. The inappropriate use of oral antidiabetics was particularly common.

Optimizing hypertension management in clinical practice

A clear relationship exists between elevated blood pressure (BP) and various manifestations of cardiovascular disease. Despite the availability of numerous treatment guidelines, hypertension remains inadequately controlled, with only a small proportion of patients achieving target BP levels. Many factors, both patient and physician related, contribute to this poor level of hypertension control. Major determinants include the implementation of inappropriate treatment regimens that do not enable patients to achieve goal and poor patient compliance. For example, it is widely acknowledged that most patients require two or more antihypertensive drugs to achieve BP goal; however, physicians may be reluctant to employ such treatment strategies. The aim of this review is to explore factors that contribute to poor hypertension control rates and how to overcome these, including the rationale for selecting combination therapy, with particular reference to angiotensin II receptor blocker combinations.

Managing hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

PURPOSE

Current guideline recommendations for effective strategies to optimize the treatment of patients with concomitant hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Current estimates indicate that 20 million people in the United States have diabetes, 90-95% of whom have type 2 diabetes mellitus. Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with an increased risk of premature death from cardiovascular disease (CVD), stroke, and end-stage renal disease. Hypertension is an extremely common comorbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The coexistence of hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes is particularly destructive because of the strong linkage of the two conditions with CVD, stroke, progression of renal disease, and diabetic nephropathy. Current guidelines, including those issued by the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure, the National Kidney Foundation, and the American Diabetes Association, provide evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, studies indicate that guidelines are not widely followed. Therefore, the beneficial effects of appropriate hypertension treatment observed in clinical trials are often not recognized in clinical practice. Pharmacists are ideally positioned to help improve guideline implementation and patient outcome.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacists must become more vigilant about following current guidelines for the treatment of patients with concomitant hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Strategies such as patient education and medication assessment can help to optimize care for these patients and slow the progression to diabetic nephropathy.

SMP-534 ameliorates progression of glomerular fibrosis and urinary albumin in diabeticdb/dbmice

Diabetic nephropathy is currently the most common cause of end-stage renal disease. Diabetic nephropathy patients, whether insulin dependent or not, develop fibrotic changes in glomeruli that manifest as overt nephropathy. Previously, we demonstrated that 5-chloro-2-{(1E)-3-[2-(4-methoxybenzoyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrrol-1-yl]prop-1-en-1-yl}- N-(methylsulfonyl)benzamide (SMP-534) reduces extracellular matrix (ECM) production induced by transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) in vitro and prevents the accumulation of ECM in glomeruli in rat Thy-1 nephritis models. In this study, we examined the long-term effects of SMP-534 on renal insufficiency and glomerulosclerosis in db/db mice, which are models of type 2 diabetes. A diet containing SMP-534 was given to the mice from the age of 9 to 25 wk, and blood and urine analysis were performed at 8, 17, and 25 wk. At the end of study, kidney tissues were analyzed histologically. Treatment with SMP-534 dose dependently suppressed the increase of urinary albumin and type IV collagen excretion in db/db mice. The renal histological analysis showed that SMP-534 dose dependently suppressed the increase of mesangial expansion in the kidney. In the immunohistological analysis, fibronectin and type IV collagen expression were lower in SMP-534-treated db/db mice compared with vehicle-treated db/db mice. This study suggested that SMP-534 ameliorated the increase of ECM production in kidney of db/db mice, possibly through the inhibition of TGF-β action. Hence, antifibrotic agents such as SMP-534 might be a new therapeutic option for the treatment of diabetic nephropathy.

Progression of kidney disease in type 2 diabetes - beyond blood pressure control: an observational study

BACKGROUND

The risk factors for progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) have not been fully elucidated. Although uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) is known to be deleterious, other factors may become more important once BP is treated.

METHODS

All patients seen in the outpatient clinics of our hospital between January 1993 and September 2002 with type 2 DM and clinical evidence of CKD were evaluated. Progression of kidney disease was evaluated by rate of decline of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) as estimated from the simplified MDRD formula. Variables associated with progression in univariate analyses were examined by multivariate analysis to determine the factors independently associated with kidney disease progression.

RESULTS

343 patients (mean age 69 years; all male; 77% Caucasian) were studied. Mean BP, glycated hemoglobin, and serum cholesterol during the study period were 138/72 mmHg, 8.1%, and 4.8 mmol/L, respectively. Mean decline of GFR was 4.5 ml min-1 1.73 m2-1 yr-1 (range -14 to +32). Low initial serum albumin (p < 0.001), black race (p < 0.001), and degree of proteinuria (p = 0.002), but not blood pressure, glycated hemoglobin, or serum cholesterol, were independently associated with progression.

CONCLUSION

In a cohort of diabetic patients with CKD in whom mean BP was < 140/80 mmHg, the potentially remediable factors hypoalbuminemia and proteinuria but not blood pressure were independently associated with progression of kidney disease. Further understanding of the relationship between these factors and kidney disease progression may lead to beneficial therapies in such patients.

Diabetes mellitus and heart failure: basic mechanisms, clinical features, and therapeutic considerations

Diabetic cardiomyopathy encompasses the spectrum from subclinical disease to the full-blown syndrome of congestive heart failure. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus is increasing at an alarming rate in the western world. and with it, the frequency of diabetes-related heart failure. There is at least early suggestion that target-driven, long-term, intensified intervention that is aimed at multiple risk factors in patients who have type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria may reduce the risk of macrovascular (cardiovascular) and micro-vascular complications by approximately 50%. Thus, it is imperative that patients, particularly those who are at risk for the cardiovascular dysmetabolic syndrome, be screened aggressively for the presence of glucose intolerance and diabetes. When detected, all metabolic and cardio-vascular parameters should be evaluated and treated aggressively to reach currently recommended clinical targets. Such action will result in great benefit for patients by reducing morbidity and mortality and improving quality of life and will reduce the financial burden that is associated with this epidemic disease.