Statin therapy in stroke prevention: a meta-analysis involving 121,000 patients

Trends in vascular risk factor treatment and control in US stroke survivors: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (1999-2010)

BACKGROUND

Treatment and control of vascular risk factors reduce the likelihood of recurrent stroke. Present nationally representative data are sparse regarding secondary prevention treatment and control rates.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated sex- and race-stratified blood pressure, cholesterol, and hemoglobin A1c levels and treatment and control rates in 1154 self-reported stroke survivors from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 1999 to 2010. We used weighted linear regression to estimate time trends. Participants were 54% to 61% women, 70% to 76% white, and had a mean age of 63 to 66 years. For blood pressure, treatment rates remained unchanged in men, but in women, treatment rates increased from 41% in 1999 to 2000 to 65% in 2009 to 2010 (P=0.03), and control rates increased from 23% to 79% (P=0.03). Treatment rates remained unchanged in non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, and Mexican Americans, although control rates increased in non-Hispanic whites from 50% in 1999 to 2002 to 69% in 2007 to 2010 (P=0.04). For cholesterol, treatment rates increased from 30% to 40% in men (P=0.02) and from 28% to 36% (P<0.01) in women, but control rates increased only in men, from 62% to 87% (P<0.01). Cholesterol treatment rates increased only in non-Hispanic blacks, from 18% to 37% (P=0.02). By sex and race, there was no change in dysglycemia treatment and control.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite improvements in blood pressure treatment and control and cholesterol treatment for women and cholesterol treatment and control for men, stroke secondary prevention through treatment and control of vascular risk factors remains suboptimal. Urgent action is needed to improve secondary prevention to reduce stroke morbidity and mortality in this high-risk group.

Comparative effects of statins on major cerebrovascular events: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis of placebo-controlled and active-comparator trials

Statins are important in the prevention of major cerebrovascular events. Whether, and the extent to which, individual statins differ in terms of their effect on these outcomes has not been studied. The aim of this review was to evaluate the comparative effects of individual statins on major cerebrovascular events. We systematically reviewed 61 trials including 187 038 individuals with, or at risk of developing, cardiovascular disease. We performed pair-wise and multiple-treatments meta-analyses for major cerebrovascular events, in addition to fatal and non-fatal strokes separately. Across all populations, statins were significantly more effective than control in reducing major cerebrovascular events [odds ratio (OR): 0.82, 95% CI: 0.77, 0.87], with no differences among individual statins. Statins were also effective in patients with established cardiovascular disease (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.91) and in those without (OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.71, 0.91). Considering individual statins, significant risk reductions were achieved with atorvastatin (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.85), pravastatin (OR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.76, 0.97) and simvastatin (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.62, 0.88) as compared with control on major cerebrovascular events across all populations. Statins led to significant reductions in the risk of non-fatal strokes (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.71, 0.85) but not of fatal strokes (OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.80, 1.15). Findings were not sensitive to dose differentials of individual statins across the trials. No significant heterogeneity or inconsistency was detected. Statins significantly reduce the incidence of major cerebrovascular events as compared with control. Our analysis provided evidence to confirm the class effect of statins in preventing major cerebrovascular events.

The effect of statins on acute and long-term outcome after ischemic stroke in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Although treatment with statins has produced beneficial effects when used as secondary prevention, its primary protective role is still somewhat controversial. Moreover, few studies have evaluated the effect of statins in older patients with stroke.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to investigate whether treatment with statins decreases stroke severity and/or improves survival and outcome after stroke in an older population.

METHODS

We investigated the association between previous statin use and stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS]), as well as the effect of poststroke statin treatment on 12-month functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score) in 799 patients (mean age, 78 years), with acute ischemic stroke. The effect of statin treatment on survival was examined using the Cox proportional hazard model, after adjusting for relevant covariates.

RESULTS

Statins did not decrease stroke severity and did not improve 30-day survival. However, both the 12-month survival (hazard ratio = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.20-to 0.54; P < 0.001) and the 12-month functional outcome (odds ratio = 2.09; 95% CI, 1.25-3.52; P = 0.005) were significantly better in the group treated with statins.

CONCLUSIONS

Significantly better survival and functional outcome were noted with poststroke statins at the end of the 12-month follow-up period. Statins seem to provide beneficial effects for the long-term functional outcome and survival in the elderly.

Impact of polyunsaturated fatty acid consumption prior to ischemic stroke

OBJECTIVE

The Japanese have higher levels of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) such as eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in their diets. These facts may contribute to the lower rates of atherosclerosis in Japanese. The purposes of this study were to assess the PUFA levels in patients with subtypes of acute ischemic stroke and to assess the relationship between severity and PUFA levels.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We studied 75 patients with lacunar infarction (LI; n = 25), atherothrombotic infarction (AT; n = 32), and cardiogenic embolism (CE; n = 18). The patients underwent blood examinations in a fasting state next morning of hospitalization, including examination of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), triglyceride (TG), blood glucose, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), uric acid, and fatty acid fractions of EPA, DHA, dihomo-γ-linolenic acid (DGLA), and arachidonic acid (AA). We used the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) to assess clinical severity at discharge.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the EPA/AA and DHA/AA ratio among the three stroke subgroups, although the DGLA/AA ratio was significantly higher in patients with LI than in patients with CE. Considering the confounding factors, the mRS was negatively correlated with EPA/AA and positively correlated with age, DHA/AA, and blood glucose.

CONCLUSIONS

High EPA/AA ratio was associated with good outcome in ischemic stroke. Our paper suggests that prestroke dietary habits affect the severity in patients with ischemic stroke.

The current management of carotid atherosclerotic disease: who, when and how?

Ischaemic stroke represents a major health hazard in the western world, which has a severe impact on society and the health-care system. Roughly, 10% of all first ischaemic strokes can be attributed to significant atherosclerotic disease of the carotid arteries. Correct management of these lesions is essential in the prevention and treatment of carotid disease-related ischaemic events. The close relationship between diagnosis and medical and surgical management makes it necessary that all involved physicians and surgeons have profound knowledge of management strategies beyond their specific speciality. Continuous improvement in pharmacological therapy and operative techniques as well as frequently changing guidelines represent a constant challenge for the individual health-care professional. This review gives a thorough outline of the up-to-date evidence-based management of carotid artery disease and discusses its current controversies.

Neuroprotective effects of statins: evidence from preclinical and clinical studies

OPINION STATEMENT

The benefits of statins for both primary and secondary prevention of ischemic stroke are clearly established. Evidence is accumulating that statin withdrawal after ischemic stroke may lead to worse outcome and that initiation of statins after ischemic stroke may reduce mortality and improve outcome. Current treatment guidelines recommend starting statins before discharge in patients with stroke related to atherosclerosis or who have elevated cholesterol. The primary treatment question then is not if to start statins in most ischemic stroke patients, but when. Our recommendation would be start a statin as soon as the patient passes a dysphagia screen and can safely take oral medication. Based on the results of the Heart Protection Study and the SPARCL trial, either simvastatin 40 mg or atorvastatin 80 mg are appropriate alternatives. Clinical trials are needed to demonstrate unequivocal efficacy of improved outcome and to determine if lower doses may have this effect. Additionally, improved outcome needs to be established in cardioembolic stroke patients before routine use of statins in this stroke subtype can be recommended.

Associations between demographic, disease related, and treatment pathway related variables and health related quality of life in primary care patients with coronary heart disease

Background

Coronory heart disease (CHD) is a common medical problem worldwide that demands shared care of general practitioners and cardiologists for concerned patients. In order to improve the cooperation between both medical specialists and to optimize evidence-based care, a treatment pathway for patients with CHD was developed and evaluated in a feasibility study according to the recommendation for the development and evaluation of complex interventions of the British Medical Research Council (MRC). In the context of this feasibility study the objective of the present research was to investigate the contributions of different disease related (e.g. prior myocardial infarction), pathway related (e.g. basic medication) and demographic variables on patients` perceived health related quality of life (HRQoL) as a relevant and widely used outcome measure in cardiac populations.

Methods

Data assessing demographic, disease and pathway related variables of CHD patients included in the study were collected in a quasi-experimental design with three study arms (pathway developers, users, control group) via case record forms and questionnaires at baseline and after 6 and 12 (intervention groups), and 9 months (control group), respectively after the initial implementation on GP level. Additionally, at the same measuring points the CHD patients participating in the study were interviewed by phone regarding their perceived HRQoL, measured with the EuroQol EQ-5D as an index-based health questionnaire. Due to the hierarchical structure of the data, we performed cross-sectional and longitudinal linear mixed models to investigate the impact of disease related, pathway related and demographic variables on patients` perceived HRQoL.

Results

Of 334 initially recruited patients with CHD, a total of 290 were included in our analysis. This was an average 13.2% dropout rate from baseline assessment to the 12-month follow-up. At all assessment points, patients` HRQoL was associated with a variety of sociodemographic variables (e.g. gender, employment, education) in each study group, but there was no association with pathway related variables. In both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses highest HRQoL values in patients were reported in the physician group that had developed the pathway. In the longitudinal analyses there were no significant changes in the reported HRQoL values of the three groups over time.

Conclusions

The found associations between sociodemographic variables and the perceived HRQoL of patients with CHD are in line with other research. As there are no associations of HRQoL with pathway related variables like the basic medication, possible weaknesses in the study design or the choice of outcome have to be considered before planning and conducting an evaluation study according to the MRC recommendations. Additionally, as patients in the developer group reported the highest HRQoL values over time, a higher commitment of the GPs in the developer group can be assumed and should be considered in further research.

Impact of spirituality/religiosity on mortality: comparison with other health interventions

Scientists have been interested in the influence of religion on mortality for at least 130 years. Since this time, many debates have been held by researchers who believe or do not believe in this association. The objective of this study is to compare the impact of spirituality and religiosity (S/R) with other health interventions on mortality. The authors selected 25 well-known health interventions. Then, a search of online medical databases was performed. Meta-analyses between 1994 and 2009 involving mortality were chosen. The same was done for religiosity and spirituality. The combined hazard ratio was obtained directly by the systematic reviews and the mortality reductions by S/R and other health interventions were compared. Twenty-eight meta-analyses with mortality outcomes were selected (25 health interventions and three dealing with S/R). From these three meta-analyses, considering those with the most conservative results, persons with higher S/R had an 18% reduction in mortality. This result is stronger than 60.0% of the 25 systematic reviews analyzed (similar to consumption of fruits and vegetables for cardiovascular events and stronger than statin therapy). These results suggest that S/R plays a considerable role in mortality rate reductions, comparable to fruit and vegetable consumption and statin therapy.

Systematic drug repositioning based on clinical side-effects

Drug repositioning helps fully explore indications for marketed drugs and clinical candidates. Here we show that the clinical side-effects (SEs) provide a human phenotypic profile for the drug, and this profile can suggest additional disease indications. We extracted 3,175 SE-disease relationships by combining the SE-drug relationships from drug labels and the drug-disease relationships from PharmGKB. Many relationships provide explicit repositioning hypotheses, such as drugs causing hypoglycemia are potential candidates for diabetes. We built Naïve Bayes models to predict indications for 145 diseases using the SEs as features. The AUC was above 0.8 in 92% of these models. The method was extended to predict indications for clinical compounds, 36% of the models achieved AUC above 0.7. This suggests that closer attention should be paid to the SEs observed in trials not just to evaluate the harmful effects, but also to rationally explore the repositioning potential based on this “clinical phenotypic assay”.

Statin use during ischemic stroke hospitalization is strongly associated with improved poststroke survival

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Statins reduce infarct size in animal models of stroke and have been hypothesized to improve clinical outcomes after ischemic stroke. We examined the relationship between statin use before and during stroke hospitalization and poststroke survival.

METHODS

We analyzed records from 12 689 patients admitted with ischemic stroke to any of 17 hospitals in a large integrated healthcare delivery system between January 2000 and December 2007. We used multivariable survival analysis and grouped-treatment analysis, an instrumental variable method that uses treatment differences between facilities to avoid individual patient-level confounding.

RESULTS

Statin use before ischemic stroke hospitalization was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.79-0.93; P<0.001), and use before and during hospitalization was associated with better rates of survival (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.53-0.65; P<0.001). Patients taking a statin before their stroke who underwent statin withdrawal in the hospital had a substantially greater risk of death (hazard ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 2.1-2.9; P<0.001). The benefit was greater for high-dose (>60 mg/day) statin use (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.34-0.53; P<0.001) than for lower dose (<60 mg/day) statin use (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.54-0.67; P<0.001; test for trend P<0.001), and earlier treatment in-hospital further improved survival. Grouped-treatment analysis showed that the association between statin use and survival cannot be explained by patient-level confounding.

CONCLUSIONS

Statin use early in stroke hospitalization is strongly associated with improved poststroke survival, and statin withdrawal in the hospital, even for a brief period, is associated with worsened survival.

Effects of pravastatin on mediators of vascular function in a mouse model of soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-induced preeclampsia

OBJECTIVE

We sought to investigate the mechanisms of action by which pravastatin improves vascular reactivity in a mouse model of preeclampsia induced by overexpression of soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt)-1.

STUDY DESIGN

Pregnant CD-1 mice were randomly allocated to tail vein injection with adenovirus carrying sFlt-1 or murine immunoglobulin G2 Fc (control), and thereafter to receive pravastatin (5 mg/kg/d) or water. Mice were sacrificed at gestational day 18. Protein expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1, and hemeoxygenase-1 were assayed by Western blot in aorta, liver, and kidneys. Serum total cholesterol concentrations were measured.

RESULTS

Pravastatin up-regulated eNOS expression in the aorta of sFlt-1 mice by nearly 2-fold (P = .005) to levels similar to control mice. Total cholesterol levels, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1, and hemeoxygenase-1 protein expression were similar across groups.

CONCLUSION

Pravastatin prevents vascular dysfunction in part by up-regulation of eNOS in the vasculature. Our data support a role for statins in preeclampsia prevention.

Projected impact of polypill use among US adults: Medication use, cardiovascular risk reduction, and side effects

BACKGROUND

Polypills, which include multiple medications for reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in a single pill, have been proposed for population-wide use. The number of US adults eligible for polypills and potential benefits are unknown.

METHODS

The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2004 and 2007-2008 were analyzed to estimate treatment rates for medications proposed for inclusion in polypills (aspirin, statin, an angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitor, and a thiazide-type diuretic for those without and a β-blocker for those with a history of myocardial infarction) among US adults. The number of coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke events potentially prevented through polypill use was projected by published meta-analyses and 3 large population-based cohort studies. Two polypill eligibility criteria were analyzed: (1) US adults ≥55 years and (2) US adults with a history of CVD.

RESULTS

There are 67.6 million US adults ≥55 years and 15.4 million US adults with a history of CVD and, thus, eligible for polypills using the 2 outlined criteria. In 2007 to 2008, 37.3% of US adults ≥55 years and 57.0% of those with a history of CVD were taking statins. Use of other polypill medications was also low. Polypill use by US adults aged ≥55 years is projected to potentially prevent 3.2 million CHD events and 1.7 million strokes over 10 years. Among those with a history of CVD, the potential to prevent of 0.9 million CHD events and 0.5 million strokes is projected.

CONCLUSIONS

Polypills have the potential to lower CVD incidence substantially among US adults.

Carotid MRI: a tool for monitoring individual response to cardiovascular therapy?

Stroke remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. While stroke-related mortality has declined over the past four decades, data indicate that the mortality rate has begun to plateau. This change in trend may be attributable to variation in individual response to therapies that were derived from population-based studies. Further reductions in stroke mortality may require individualized care governed by directly monitoring the effects of cardiovascular therapy. In this article, carotid MRI is considered as a tool for monitoring in vivo carotid atherosclerotic disease, a principal etiology of stroke. Carotid MRI has been previously utilized to identify specific plaque features beyond luminal stenosis that are predictive of transient ischemic attack and stroke. To gain perspective on the possibility of monitoring plaque change within the individual, clinical trials and natural history studies that have used serial carotid MRI are considered. Data from these studies indicate that patients with a lipid-rich necrotic core with or without intraplaque hemorrhage may represent the desired phenotype for monitoring treatment effects in the individual. Advances in tissue-specific sequences, acquisition resolution, scan time, and techniques for monitoring inflammation and mechanical forces are expected to enable earlier detection of response to therapy. In so doing, cost-effective multicenter studies can be conducted to confirm the anticipated positive effects on outcomes of using carotid MRI for individualized care in patients with carotid atherosclerosis. In accordance, carotid MRI is poised to emerge as a powerful clinical tool for individualized management of carotid atherosclerotic disease to prevent stroke.

Intensive statin therapy compared with moderate dosing for prevention of cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis of >40 000 patients

AIMS

Statin therapy is associated with important benefits for patients at risk of, and with, established cardiovascular disease. There is widespread interest in whether intensive dosing of statins yields larger treatment effects. We aimed to determine if intensive dosing is clinically important using a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

METHODS

We conducted comprehensive searches of electronic databases from inception to December 2010. We included any RCT evaluating a larger dose with a clinically common dose. Two reviewers independently extracted data, in duplicate. We performed random-effects meta-analysis and a trial sequential analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 10 RCTs enrolling a total of 41 778 participants. Trials followed patients for a mean of 2.5 years. We did not find statistically significant effects on all-cause mortality [relative risk (RR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.83-1.03, P = 0.14, I(2) = 38%] or cardiovascular disease (CVD) deaths (RR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.78-1.01, P = 0.07, I(2) = 34%). When we pooled the composite endpoint of coronary heart disease (CHD) death plus non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), we found a significant protective effect of intensive statin dosing (RR 0.90, 95% CI, 0.84-0.96, P ≤ 0.0001, I(2) = 0%). We also found a significant effect on non-fatal MIs (RR 0.82, 95% CI, 0.76-0.89, P ≤ 0.0001, I(2) = 0%) and a significant reduction in the composite of fatal and non-fatal strokes (excluding transient ischaemic attacks) reported in 10 RCTs (RR 0.86, 95% CI, 0.77-0.96, P = 0.006, I(2) = 0%). A subgroup analysis of three trials examining acute coronary syndrome patients found significant effects on all-cause (RR 0.75, 95% CI, 0.61-0.91, P = 0.005, I(2) = 0%) and CVD mortality (RR 0.74, 95% CI, 0.59-0.94, P = 0.013, I(2) = 0%) with intensive dosing. Applying an analysis of optimal information size on the primary analysis, we found that the evidence for CHD death plus non-fatal MIs is conclusive. The evidence for CVD deaths alone is not yet conclusive.

CONCLUSIONS

Available evidence suggests that intensive statin therapy reduces the risk of non-fatal events and may have a role in reducing mortality.

Lipid-lowering treatment in hypercholesterolaemic patients: the CEPHEUS Pan-Asian survey

BACKGROUND

Treatment of hypercholesterolaemia in Asia is rarely evaluated on a large scale, and data on treatment outcome are scarce. The Pan-Asian CEPHEUS study aimed to assess low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment among patients on lipid-lowering therapy.

METHODS

This survey was conducted in eight Asian countries. Hypercholesterolaemic patients aged ≥18 years who had been on lipid-lowering treatment for ≥3 months (stable medication for ≥6 weeks) were recruited, and lipid concentrations were measured. Demographic and other clinically relevant information were collected, and the cardiovascular risk of each patient was determined. Definitions and criteria set by the updated 2004 National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines were applied.

RESULTS

In this survey, 501 physicians enrolled 8064 patients, of whom 7281 were included in the final analysis. The mean age was 61.0 years, 44.4% were female, and 85.1% were on statin monotherapy. LDL-C goal attainment was reported in 49.1% of patients overall, including 51.2% of primary and 48.7% of secondary prevention patients, and 36.6% of patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia. The LDL-C goal was attained in 75.4% of moderate risk, 55.4% of high risk, and only 34.9% of very high-risk patients. Goal attainment was directly related to age and inversely related to cardiovascular risk and baseline LDL-C.

CONCLUSION

A large proportion of Asian hypercholesterolaemic patients on lipid-lowering drugs are not at recommended LDL-C levels and remain at risk for cardiovascular disease. Given the proven efficacy of lipid-lowering drugs in the reduction of LDL-C, there is room for further optimization of treatments to maximize benefits and improve outcomes.

Spectrophotometric determination of atorvastatin and amlodipine by H-point standard addition method with simultaneous addition of both analytes in nonaqueous solution

H-point standard addition method(HPSAM) with simultaneous addition of both analytes in nonaqueous solution was applied for determination of Atorvastatin (AT) and Amlodipine (AML). The results showed that simultaneous determination could be performed with the ratio 0.16 to 4.3 of AT–AML. The corresponding values of LOD were obtained for AT and AML 1.2 × 10–6 and 9 × 10–7 mol l–1, respectively, and the corresponding values of LOQ were obtained for AT and AML 4 × 10–6 and 3 × 10–6 mol l–1, respectively. Underworking conditions, the proposed method was successfully applied for simultaneous determination of AT and AML in several synthetic mixtures and Amostatine tablets.

Event reduction: revisiting why we treat with statins and harnessing current evidence towards optimal therapy

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Statins are widely accepted as the drugs of choice for achieving increasingly stringent low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals for dyslipidemic patients. However, when making treatment decisions, outcomes data from clinical trials are of greater importance than LDL-C-lowering ability.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This review will provide an update on current lipid treatment guidelines in the context of statin trial evidence, with particular focus on the incremental benefit of more potent statin therapy compared with lower doses. The discussion will also address combination therapy, statin safety, goal attainment and treatment adherence. MEDLINE searches (1966 to July 2010) were performed.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

The reader will gain a comprehensive review of the evidence base for statin therapy and an appreciation of other issues that affect treatment choice.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

It is important to remember why we need to partner with our patients: to ensure that they are established on, and continue to adhere to, their appropriate evidence-based statin dose with a goal of achieving lipid targets, but more importantly to prevent cardiovascular disease-related morbidity and mortality. We treat patients to reduce clinical cardiovascular events, not just to control lipids and other important risk factors.

Statintherapy in the primary and the secondary prevention of ischaemic cerebrovascular diseases

INTRODUCTION

Stroke is a major public health problem. It is the third leading cause of death worldwide and results in hospital admissions, morbidity, and long-term disability. Despite the inconsistent or weak association between cholesterol and stroke, statins can reduce the incidence of stroke in high-risk populations and in patients with a stroke or transient ischaemic attack.

METHODS

The aim of our study was to review the efficacy of statin therapy in both primary and secondary stroke prevention. We also reviewed the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness among different statins and we also reviewed the possible effect of treatment added to statin monotherapy.

RESULTS

There is evidence that statin therapy in both primary and secondary prevention significantly reduces subsequent major coronary events but only marginally reduces the risk of stroke recurrence. There is no clear evidence of beneficial effect from statins in those with previous haemorrhagic stroke and it is unclear whether statins should be started immediately post stroke or later. There is a pressing need for direct evidence, from head-to-head trials, to determine whether individual statins provide differing protection from clinically important events in stroke prevention. It is possible that combinations of lipid-lowering agents did not improve clinical outcomes more than high-dose statin monotherapy, although clinical trials are still ongoing.

Impact of lipid-lowering therapy on outcomes in atrial fibrillation

Lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) decreases mortality in select patient populations. LLT has also been shown to have antiarrhythmic effects, thus favorably influencing the incidence and recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data are lacking regarding the effect of LLT on mortality in patients with AF. The Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study was the one of the largest multicenter trials comprising of 4,060 patients with AF at high risk for stroke and death. This is a post hoc analysis of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute limited-access dataset of AFFIRM patients who were on LLT at the time of randomization (n = 913). The control group consisted of AFFIRM patients who were not on LLT (n = 3,147). Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed controlling for baseline differences. The end point was all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and ischemic stroke. A separate analysis was carried out for the combined end point of death, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, cardiac arrest, ischemic stroke, major bleeding, systemic embolism, pulmonary embolism, and myocardial infarction. Patients on LLT were younger and on more cardioactive medications but also had more cardiovascular morbidities. On multivariate analysis, LLT use was associated with lower all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62 to 0.95, p = 0.01), cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.95, p = 0.02), ischemic stroke (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.89, p = 0.01), and combined end point (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.96, p = 0.01). In conclusion, a decrease in mortality and adverse cardiovascular events was observed using LLT in AF.

Residual risk for secondary ischemic events in patients with atherothrombotic disease: opportunity for future improvements in patient care

Atherothrombotic disease is highly prevalent in Western countries and is associated with morbidity, mortality, and a significant economic burden. The primary pathophysiological mechanism of acute ischemic events in patients with atherothrombotic disease is complex but involves thrombotic occlusion in response to rupture or erosion of atherosclerotic lesions. Current treatments for long-term secondary prevention in patients with established atherothrombotic disease, such as those with prior myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack, or symptomatic peripheral artery disease, include therapies aimed at preventing rupture/erosion of atherosclerotic lesions (life-style modification and blood pressure reduction, in addition to statins and angiotensin II-active agents) and thrombus formation (primarily antiplatelet agents, such as aspirin, thienopyridines (clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticlopidine), and, to a lesser degree, anticoagulants). Despite the proven benefits and broad use of these therapies, the long-term rates of mortality and recurrent ischemic events remain high. This residual risk can be attributed to the fact that atherothrombosis continues in the presence of current treatments; because these agents each inhibit relatively specific pathways, atherosclerosis, thrombus formation, and other processes may progress. These considerations suggest that novel therapies with a different mechanism of action may provide additional reductions in morbidity and mortality beyond those observed with current agents.

Raloxifene and risk for stroke based on the framingham stroke risk score

PURPOSE

Raloxifene reduces vertebral fracture and invasive breast cancer risks, but increases fatal strokes in postmenopausal women at increased coronary risk. We assessed whether this risk is concentrated in postmenopausal women already at high stroke risk.

METHODS

Raloxifene Use for The Heart (RUTH) enrolled 10,101 postmenopausal women (mean age 67 years) with or at increased coronary heart disease risk; Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) enrolled 7705 osteoporotic postmenopausal women (mean age 66 years). A Framingham Stroke Risk Score (FSRS) was calculated for all women with no prior cerebrovascular events (n = 16,858). The validity of the FSRS was assessed in the placebo groups, and then raloxifene-associated stroke risk was analyzed by FSRS subgroups.

RESULTS

FSRS predicted an increased stroke risk in the placebo group of both clinical trials. There was no difference in the incidence of nonfatal strokes between the raloxifene and placebo groups in MORE or RUTH, regardless of baseline Framingham stroke risk. In RUTH, women with FSRS <13 showed no increase in raloxifene-associated fatal stroke risk (hazard ratio [HR] 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-2.37). Those with FSRS >or=13 had a 75% increased risk of raloxifene-associated fatal stroke (HR 1.75; 95% CI, 1.01-3.02; interaction P = .33). In MORE, where 80% of women had a FSRS <13, no increase in fatal (HR 0.57; 95% CI, 0.19-1.68) stroke risk was observed.

DISCUSSION

Risk of fatal stroke associated with raloxifene was greater in women at high stroke risk. These results might be useful for identifying postmenopausal women at high risk of first stroke who should avoid raloxifene therapy.

Effect of statin adherence on cerebrovascular disease in primary prevention

BACKGROUND

Evidence from meta-analyses shows that statin therapy reduces all-cause mortality and nonhemorrhagic strokes. Nonadherence to statins may reduce this protective effect. The association between statin adherence and incidence of cerebrovascular disease remains unexplored outside the context of clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of statin adherence on the occurrence of cerebrovascular disease in a real clinical setting.

METHODS

A cohort of 112,092 patients was reconstructed using the Régie d'assurance maladie du Québec and Med-Echo databases. The Régie d'assurance maladie du Québec database contains information from 3 types of health-related data, such as demographic information, medical data, and the prescription claims file. The Med-Echo database contains data on acute care hospitalizations on all Quebec residents. All patients without cardiovascular disease aged 45-85 years who were newly treated with statins between 1999 and 2004 were eligible. A nested case-control design was used to study the occurrence of cerebrovascular disease. Adherence level was reported as a medication possession ratio. Conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate the rate ratio of cerebrovascular disease, adjusting for different covariables.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 63 years; 49% had hypertension, 21% had diabetes, and 41% were males. Nonadherence was prevalent because only 55% of the patients were exposed to > or = 80% of the medication during follow-up. We did not observe any major differences, defined as more than 5%, between the groups, except for the sex, diabetes, and hypertension. High level of adherence to statins was associated with a reduction of cerebrovascular events (rate ratio: 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.84).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests a relatively low level of adherence to statins, but more importantly, that adherence is associated with a risk reduction for cerebrovascular disease. Adherence to statin therapy needs to be improved, so that patients can benefit from the full protective effects of statin therapy.

Relationships between lipoprotein components and risk of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in the Apolipoprotein MOrtality RISk study (AMORIS)

OBJECTIVES

To compare lipoprotein components associated with ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke by age and gender in the Apolipoprotein MOrtality RISk (AMORIS) Study (n=148 600).

DESIGN

Prospective follow-up study (11.8, range 7-17 years) of fatal and nonfatal ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke through linkage with Swedish hospital discharge and mortality registers.

SETTING

Measurements of lipoprotein components from health check-ups in the larger Stockholm area.

RESULTS

Ischaemic stroke was more common than haemorrhagic stroke (5 :1), but case fatality was higher in haemorrhagic stroke. An elevated apoB/apoA-1 ratio and triglycerides, non-HDL cholesterol, low HDL cholesterol, and the total cholesterol to high-density cholesterol (TC/HDL-C) ratio were associated with increased incidence of nonfatal and fatal ischaemic stroke as well as all cerebrovascular events (n=7480) in both genders. The associations were somewhat stronger for nonfatal than fatal events. In ischaemic stroke the apoB/apoA-1 ratio was a stronger predictor than the TC/HDL-C ratio in all subjects, in those below 65 years of age and in those with LDL-C below 3 mmol L(-1). Haemorrhagic stroke was not associated with elevated atherogenic lipoproteins except for increased risk of fatal haemorrhagic stroke in women with a high apoB/apoA-I ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

Dyslipidaemia is associated with an increased risk of ischaemic stroke but few relations were seen in haemorrhagic stroke. Use of the apoB/apoA-I ratio as a marker of dyslipidaemia is at least as efficient as conventional lipids, for the identification of subjects at increased risk of stroke, especially ischaemic stroke. Practical advantages, fasting is not needed, speak in favour of using apoB and apoA-1 in stroke risk prediction.

Primary prevention of cardiovascular mortality and events with statin treatments: a network meta-analysis involving more than 65,000 patients

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) in primary prevention of cardiovascular events.

BACKGROUND

The role of statins is well established for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) clinical events and mortality. Little is known of their role in primary cardiovascular event prevention.

METHODS

We conducted comprehensive searches of 10 electronic databases from inception to May 2008. We contacted study investigators and maintained a comprehensive bibliography of statin studies. We included randomized trials of at least 12-month duration in predominantly primary prevention populations. Two reviewers independently extracted data in duplicate. We performed random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression, calculated optimal information size, and conducted a mixed-treatment comparison analysis.

RESULTS

We included 20 randomized clinical trials. We pooled 19 trials (n = 63,899) for all-cause mortality and found a relative risk (RR) of 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87 to 0.99, p = 0.03 [I(2) = 5%, 95% CI: 0% to 51%]). Eighteen trials (n = 59,469) assessed cardiovascular deaths (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.98, p = 0.01 [I(2) = 0%, 95% CI: 0% to 41%]). Seventeen trials (n = 53,371) found an RR of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77 to 0.95, p = 0.004 [I(2) = 61%, 95% CI: 38% to 77%]) for major cardiovascular events, and 17 trials (n = 52,976) assessed myocardial infarctions (RR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.63 to 0.95, p = 0.01 [I(2) = 59%, 95% CI: 24% to 74%]). Incidence of cancer was not elevated in 10 trials (n = 45,469) (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.11, p = 0.59 [I(2) = 0%, 95% CI: 0% to 46%]), nor was rhabdomyolysis (RR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.25 to 3.83, p = 0.96 [I(2) = 0%, 95% CI: 0% to 40%]). Our analysis included a sufficient sample to reliably answer our primary outcome of CVD mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Statins have a clear role in primary prevention of CVD mortality and major events.

Risk factor management to prevent first stroke

This article provides an overview on the management of risk factors to prevent primary strokes, the gaps in successful management, and future directions for the research and management of stroke risk factors. The major focus is given to the management of modifiable risk factors for stroke, including hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, atrial fibrillation and other cardiac conditions, carotid artery stenosis, smoking, poor diet, physical inactivity, and obesity. A brief discussion on the management of potentially modifiable risk factors, such as alcohol and drug abuse, sleep apnea, and hyperhomocysteinemia, is included, as is the use of antiplatelet therapy in primary stroke prevention. Finally, prognostic scores to assess an individual risk for a first stroke are reviewed.

[Stroke prevention outside the pharmacy : risk factors and lifestyle]

Advice on modifiable risk and lifestyle factors for stroke prevention should be an established component of medical consultation. It is most important to explain that alterations to the lifestyle can be highly efficient with respect to the individual risk profile. The following review describes the importance of lifestyle factors such as nutrition, smoking, alcohol consumption, psychiatric condition, sport, dental hygiene and sleep disturbances for the risk of stroke using current data. It provides evidence that lifestyle modifications are highly effective with respect to stroke prevention. Corresponding recommendations and preventive strategies are presented.

eNOS and stroke: prevention, treatment and recovery

It is common knowledge that ischemic stroke has major social and economic consequences. However, until now, translation of experimental studies into clinical reality has been sorely lacking. So far, most studies have focused on acute stroke outcome and early treatment paradigms affording neuroprotection. It is increasingly recognized that it will be necessary to harness the capacity of the brain for neuroregeneration to improve longer-term outcome. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) is emerging as a key target in molecular stroke research. eNOS ameliorates acute ischemic injury and promotes recovery following cerebral ischemia. This review summarizes the effects of eNOS on the regulation of cerebral blood flow, hemostasis, inflammation, angiogenesis as well as neurogenesis. The possible impact on stroke prevention as well as on strategies aimed at improving long-term stroke outcome are discussed.