Fibrate/Statin initiation in warfarin users and gastrointestinal bleeding risk

A clinically significant interaction between warfarin and simvastatin is unique to carriers of the CYP2C9*3 allele

Background: Simvastatin interacts with warfarin, but the strength of the interaction varies between individual patients, indicating a genetic predisposition. Patients & methods: The influence of the CYP2C9*2 and CYP2C9*3 polymorphisms on the interaction between simvastatin and warfarin was analyzed in data from 1132 patients. Results: Simvastatin use reduced warfarin dose requirements by 29% in carriers of the CYP2C9*3 allele, compared with 5% in noncarriers. A regression model showed a significant influence of CYP2C9*3 on the drug–drug interaction, predicting a warfarin dose reduction of 25% in CYP2C9*3 heterozygotes and 43% in CYP2C9*3 homozygotes. Conclusion: Our data indicate that the CYP2C9*3 polymorphism predisposes for a pharmacologic interaction between warfarin and simvastatin.

Original submitted 5 January 2012; Revision submitted 15 February 2012

Effects of CYP4F2 polymorphism on response to warfarin during induction phase: a prospective, open-label, observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

The cytochrome P450 (CYP) 4F2 isozyme has been reported to metabolize vitamin K(1) in vitro, and the V433M polymorphism in the CYP4F2 gene has been associated with reduced vitamin K(1) metabolism and the need for a higher maintenance dosage in patients receiving warfarin.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effects of V433M polymorphism on warfarin response during the induction phase.

METHODS

Warfarin-naive white patients in whom warfarin was scheduled to be initiated with a target INR of 2 to 3 were enrolled into the study. On enrollment, a single blood sample for the genotyping of CYP4F2, CYP2C9, and VKORC1 was drawn. The international normalized ratio (INR) was followed daily during induction and twice weekly until stable anticoagulation was reached. The relationships between several markers of warfarin response during induction and CYP4F2 polymorphism were determined.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 241 patients (115 men; mean [SD] age, 55.2 [19.4] years; weight, 79.5 [18.3] kg). Most of the patients were carriers of the CYP4F2 CC genotype (112 patients) or the CT genotype (104 patients). In carriers of the TT genotype (25 patients), INR >3 was >4-fold lower compared with that in carriers of the CC or CT genotype, suggesting that patients with the TT genotype were less sensitive to warfarin during induction. Also in TT carriers, the extent of excessive anticoagulation was >10-fold lower than in the other carriers. Both of these findings had a nominal P value of <0.05. After adjustment for false discovery rate, none of the findings remained significant at a threshold q value of <0.05. Among CC carriers, the concurrent use of a statin was associated with a 1-mg/d reduction in warfarin maintenance dosage. No similar effect was noted in the CT or TT carriers, suggesting a possible genetic influence on warfarin-statin interaction.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary findings suggest that among white patients treated with warfarin, CYP4F2 polymorphism had a measurable effect on warfarin responsiveness during induction; however, the observed differences failed to reach the level of statistical significance. The possibility that the effect of statins on warfarin anticoagulation varies among carriers of different CYP4F2 genotypes could not be excluded and should be evaluated further in a larger patient sample.

Oral anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

BACKGROUND

The objective of this article is to summarize the published literature concerning the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral anticoagulant drugs that are currently available for clinical use and other aspects related to their management.

METHODS

We carried out a standard review of published articles focusing on the laboratory and clinical characteristics of the vitamin K antagonists; the direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran etexilate; and the direct factor Xa inhibitor, rivaroxaban

RESULTS

The antithrombotic effect of each oral anticoagulant drug, the interactions, and the monitoring of anticoagulation intensity are described in detail and discussed without providing specific recommendations. Moreover, we describe and discuss the clinical applications and optimal dosages of oral anticoagulant therapies, practical issues related to their initiation and monitoring, adverse events such as bleeding and other potential side effects, and available strategies for reversal.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a large amount of evidence on laboratory and clinical characteristics of vitamin K antagonists. A growing body of evidence is becoming available on the first new oral anticoagulant drugs available for clinical use, dabigatran and rivaroxaban.

Effect of pitavastatin vs. rosuvastatin on international normalized ratio in healthy volunteers on steady-state warfarin

OBJECTIVE

Statins have been shown to impact international normalized ratio (INR) when coadministered with warfarin. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of pitavastatin compared with rosuvastatin on steady-state pharmacodynamics (PD) of warfarin by measuring INR in healthy adult subjects.

METHODS

Subjects received oral doses of warfarin 5 mg once daily on days 1 through 3. The dose was titrated on days 4 through 9 to reach a steady-state INR of 1.5 to 2.2. Warfarin was continued on days 10 through 21 and pitavastatin 4 mg or rosuvastatin 40 mg was administered once daily on days 14 through 22. After a 14-day washout period, the process was repeated with the alternate statin. STUDY NUMBER: NK-104-4.03US.

RESULTS

For pitavastatin, mean INR changed from 1.73 ± 0.18 (n = 42) on day 14 before starting statin dosing, to 1.78 ± 0.29 (n = 42) on day 22 at treatment end; the difference in INR was not significant (p = 0.219). For rosuvastatin, mean INR increased significantly from 1.74 ± 0.20 (n = 43) at baseline to 1.90 ± 0.30 (n = 43) at treatment end (p < 0.001). Rosuvastatin caused a significantly greater increase in INR than pitavastatin (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Steady-state INR during warfarin treatment did not change significantly when pitavastatin 4 mg was added to the regimen, while a significant increase was observed when rosuvastatin 40 mg was added. The effect of rosuvastatin on INR was significantly larger than the effect of pitavastatin. This study is limited because it was done in healthy volunteers. Further studies in patient populations are needed to better understand the clinical significance of the results.

Risk factors of vitamin K antagonist overcoagulation

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this prospective study were to identify, in vitamin K antagonist (VKA)-treated patients, factors associated with INR values: (i) greater than 6.0. and (ii) ranging from 4.0 to 6.0 complicated with bleeding. We also assessed VKA-related morbidity in these patients.

METHODS

During a 6-month period, 3090 consecutive patients were referred to our Department of Internal Medicine, including 412 VKA-treated patients. At admission, the medical records of VKA-treated patients were reviewed for type, duration and indication of VKA therapy, previous medical history of VKA-related hemorrhage, comorbidities and concomitant medications.

RESULTS

Forty of the 412 VKA-treated patients (9.7%) exhibited oral anticoagulant related overcoagulation. VKA overcoagulation was associated with high morbidity, leading to major bleeding in 27.5% of cases; moreover, 12.5% of these patients died, death being mainly due to major bleeding. Under multivariate analysis, significant factors for VKA-related overcoagulation were as follows: previous medical history of VKA therapy-related hemorrhage (P=0.00001) and INR levels over therapeutic range (P=0.0006), chronic liver disease (P=0.03), therapy with amiodarone (P=0.009); in contrast, statin therapy was found to be a protective factor of VKA overcoagulation (P=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The knowledge of predictive factors of VKA-related overcoagulation seems of utmost importance to improve patients' management. Our study underlines the fact that the potential of drug interaction should be taken into account when choosing amiodarone for patients receiving VKAs. Interestingly, long-term (>6 month) statin therapy may be a protective factor of VKA overcoagulation. Our findings, therefore, suggest that there may be no need to switch long-term users of VKA and statin to a safer alternative therapy.

Drug and dietary interactions of warfarin and novel oral anticoagulants: an update

Clinicians and patients around the world have been intrigued by the concept of developing an oral anticoagulant with a broad therapeutic window and few drug and dietary interactions that can be administered at fixed doses with no or minimal monitoring. The recently approved oral direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, along with the emerging oral anti-factor Xa inhibitors, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, have been developed to address many of the shortcomings of warfarin therapy. As warfarin is associated with extensive food and drug interactions, there is also a need to consider such interactions with the new oral anticoagulants. While to date few drug and dietary interactions have been reported with the new oral anticoagulants, it is still early in their development and clinical use cycle. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles will have to be closely accounted for when determining the likelihood of a potential drug interaction prior to therapy initiation. As the list of drugs and supplements that interact with warfarin is continuously expanding, and the knowledge on drug interactions with the novel oral anticoagulants is still in its infancy, clinicians need to be vigilant when initiating any of these agents or when any changes in the patient's medication profile occur and perform a close screening for potential drug and dietary interactions. The objective of this paper is to give an update on drug and dietary interactions with warfarin and the novel oral anticoagulants, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban.

Antidepressant-warfarin interaction and associated gastrointestinal bleeding risk in a case-control study

Background

Bleeding is the most common and worrisome adverse effect of warfarin therapy. One of the factors that might increase bleeding risk is initiation of interacting drugs that potentiate warfarin. We sought to evaluate whether initiation of an antidepressant increases the risk of hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleeding in warfarin users.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Medicaid claims data (1999–2005) were used to perform an observational case-control study nested within person-time exposed to warfarin in those ≥18 years. In total, 430,455 warfarin users contributed 407,370 person-years of warfarin use. The incidence rate of hospitalization for GI bleeding among warfarin users was 4.48 per 100 person-years (95% CI, 4.42–4.55). Each gastrointestinal bleeding cases was matched to 50 controls based on index date and state. Warfarin users had an increased odds ratio of gastrointestinal bleeding upon initiation of citalopram (OR = 1.73 [95% CI, 1.25–2.38]), fluoxetine (OR = 1.63 [95% CI, 1.11–2.38]), paroxetine (OR = 1.64 [95% CI, 1.27–2.12]), amitriptyline (OR = 1.47 [95% CI, 1.02–2.11]). Also mirtazapine, which is not believed to interact with warfarin, increased the risk of GI bleeding (OR = 1.75 [95% CI, 1.30–2.35]).

Conclusions/Significance

Warfarin users who initiated citalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, amitriptyline, or mirtazapine had an increased risk of hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleeding. However, the elevated risk with mirtazapine suggests that a drug-drug interaction may not have been responsible for all of the observed increased risk.