Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Valve Surgery Versus Standard Sternotomy in Obese Patients Undergoing Isolated Valve Surgery

Transapical cardioscopic mitral annuloplasty: a short-term survival study in a porcine model

OBJECTIVES

The transapical approach provides concurrent surgical access to the mitral and the aortic valves, the root of the aorta and the left atrium. We previously showed the feasibility of transapical cardioscopic (TAC) surgery in a non-survival porcine model. However, reproducibility and feasibility of ring implantation using TAC have not been reported. Therefore, in this study, we hypothesized that implantation of a mitral annuloplasty ring can be feasibly and safely carried out endoscopically via the apex of the heart.

METHODS

Using a porcine model in a short-term survival study, TAC mitral annuloplasty was performed in 6 pigs via an incision over the xyphoid, under cardiopulmonary bypass and cardiac arrest. A mitral annuloplasty ring was implanted via the apex to a normal mitral annulus, using a customized set of instruments and techniques. Haemodynamics, echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, ventriculography, electrocardiography and histopathology studies were used to evaluate the function of the mitral valve and the left ventricle, coronary system and conduction system in the perioperative period and 4 weeks later.

RESULTS

All 6 animals survived and recovered from the TAC annuloplasty procedure. Postimplantation examination showed that the mitral valve was competent, left ventricular ejection fraction was 63 ± 4%, left ventricular length was 6.2 ± 0.5 cm and left ventricular end-diastolic volume was 80 ± 10 ml, which were comparable to preoperative values. Apart from a dense scar at the apex, no significant injury was noticed on the ventricle, the chordae and the mitral leaflets. The bypass, cross-clamp and implantation times were 181 ± 55 min, 130 ± 37 min and 47 ± 6 min, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite long surgical times due to the initial learning curve, successful execution of mitral ring annuloplasty could be safely achieved using the TAC approach, via a small incision without the involvement of sternum or the right pleural cavity, thereby potentially expanding the indication to patients with high-risk full sternotomy or right thoracotomy.

Pericardial Herniation of Small Bowel Post Minimally Invasive Hybrid Maze of Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Herniation of intraabdominal contents into the pericardial cavity is exceptionally rare, and when seen, it is most often the result of trauma, postsurgical complication, or genetic defect. There have been only a few case reports describing spontaneous bowel herniation into the pericardium in minimally invasive cardiac procedures like cardiac ablation, pacemaker placement, and minimally invasive coronary artery bypass graft.

CASE REPORT

We report the case of a 65-year-old man who presented to an urgent care center complaining of abdominal and chest pain. This patient had recently undergone a laparoscopic hybrid maze procedure and ultimately had an incarcerated loop of small bowel herniate into the pericardial sac. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: We present this case to increase awareness among emergency physicians of the diagnosis of a pericardial hernia in patients presenting with gastrointestinal or cardiorespiratory symptoms after surgical procedures involving the diaphragm.

Percutaneous coronary intervention followed by minimally invasive valve surgery compared with median sternotomy coronary artery bypass graft and valve surgery in patients with prior cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

In patients with prior cardiac surgery requiring re-operative coronary and valve surgery, a hybrid approach of percutaneous coronary intervention followed by minimally invasive valve surgery (PCI + MIVS) may be an alternative to the standard median sternotomy coronary artery bypass and valve surgery (CABG + valve).

METHODS

The outcomes of patients with prior cardiac surgery, presenting with coronary artery and valvular disease, who underwent PCI + MIVS (N=39) were retrospectively compared with those who underwent CABG + valve (N=28) via a repeat median sternotomy, between February 2009 and April 2014.

RESULTS

The mean age for the PCI + MIVS versus CABG + valve group was 75±9 and 72±11 years (P=0.54), respectively. The baseline characteristics were similar between groups, with the exception of a greater prevalence of 1-vessel coronary artery disease and clopidogrel or dual antiplatelet therapy at the time of surgery in the PCI + MIVS group, and more 3-vessel coronary artery disease in those undergoing CABG + valve surgery. The PCI + MIVS approach was associated with a decreased aortic cross-clamp (94 vs. 131 minutes, P=0.001) and cardiopulmonary bypass (128 vs. 190 minutes, P<0.001) times, fewer intraoperative packed red blood transfusions (1.3 vs. 3.8 units, P=0.001), shorter intensive care unit length of stay (41 vs. 71 hours, P<0.001), and decreased incidence of prolonged mechanical ventilation (12.8% vs. 35.7%, P=0.03), re-intubation (2.6% vs. 17.9%, P=0.04), when compared with CABG + valve. The thirty-day and two-year mortality were similar, being 7.7% vs. 7.1% (P=0.66), and 12.8% vs. 10.7% (P=0.55), in the PCI + MIVS vs. CABG + valve group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Hybrid PCI + MIVS in patients with prior cardiac surgery is associated with shorter operative times and intensive care unit length of stay, less need for intraoperative blood cell transfusions, decreased use of mechanical ventilation, and similar short-term and follow-up survival, when compared with CABG + valve surgery via median sternotomy. Randomized trials and multicenter registries are needed to further evaluate this approach.

Outcomes of a hybrid approach of percutaneous coronary intervention followed by minimally invasive aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

In patients requiring coronary revascularization and aortic valve replacement, a combined approach of percutaneous coronary intervention followed by minimally invasive aortic valve replacement may be a viable treatment strategy.

METHODS

The outcomes of 123 consecutive patients with significant coronary artery and aortic valve disease, who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention followed by elective minimally invasive aortic valve replacement between February 2009 and April 2014, were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 80 males and 43 females, with a mean age of 75.7±8.1 years. Drug-eluting stents were used in 69.9% of the patients, and 64.2% were on dual anti-platelet therapy at the time of aortic valve replacement. Within a median of 39 days (IQR 21-64), 83.7% of the patients underwent primary and 16.3% underwent re-operative minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. Post-operatively, there was 1 (0.8%) cerebrovascular accident, 1 patient (0.8%) required a re-operation due to bleeding, and 2 (1.6%) developed acute kidney injury. Thirty-day mortality occurred in 2 (1.6%) patients. Follow-up was available for all of the patients, and at a mean follow-up period of 14.3±12.5 months, 4 (3.3%) had an acute coronary syndrome, and 1 (0.8%) required a repeat target vessel revascularization. The actuarial survival rate at 1- and 3-year was 92.7% and 89.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In a select group of patients with coronary artery and aortic valve disease, a combined approach of percutaneous coronary intervention followed by minimally invasive aortic valve replacement can be safely performed with excellent short-term and midterm outcomes.

Minimally invasive valve surgery in high-risk patients

The use of minimally, or less invasive, approaches to cardiac valve surgery has increased over the past decade. Because of its less traumatic nature, early studies in lower risk patients demonstrated the approach to be associated with an enhanced recovery, increased patient satisfaction, and good operative outcomes. With time, despite a steep learning curve, surgeons expanded this approach to perform more complex procedures, and include patients with more co-morbidity. The aim of this publication is to review the current literature involving the use of minimally invasive valve surgery (MIVS) in higher-risk patients.

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement in high risk patient groups

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) aims to preserve the sternal integrity and improve postoperative outcomes. In low risk patients, this technique can be achieved with comparable mortality to the conventional approach and there is evidence of possible reduction in intensive care and hospital length of stay, transfusion requirement, renal dysfunction, improved respiratory function and increased patient satisfaction. In this review, we aim to asses if these benefits can be transferred to the high risk patient groups. We therefore, discuss the available evidence for the following high risk groups: elderly patients, re-operative surgery, poor lung function, pulmonary hypertension, obesity, concomitant procedures and high risk score cohorts.

Outcomes of minimally invasive double valve surgery

BACKGROUND

Double valve surgery is associated with an increased peri-operative morbidity and mortality. A less invasive right thoracotomy approach may be a viable alternative to median sternotomy surgery in these higher-risk patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the baseline demographics, operative characteristics, and post-operative outcomes of patients who underwent minimally invasive double valve surgery between January 2009 and December 2011 at our institution.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 117 patients, of which 68 (58.1%) were female. The mean age was 73±11 years, and the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 52±11%. There were 43 (36.8%) patients with a history of congestive heart failure, 45 (38.5%) with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 5 (4.3%) had a history of chronic kidney disease. The patients underwent primary (90.6%) or re-operative (9.4%) double valve surgery, which consisted of 50 (42.7%) aortic valve replacement and mitral valve repair, 31 (26.5%) mitral and tricuspid valve repair, 18 (15.4%) aortic and mitral valve replacement, 17 (14.5%) mitral valve replacement with tricuspid valve repair, and 1 (0.9%) aortic valve replacement with tricuspid valve repair. Post-operatively, there were 40 (34.2%) cases of prolonged ventilation, 9 (7.7%) acute kidney injury, 6 (5.1%) re-operations for bleeding, 1 (0.9%) cerebrovascular accident, and 15 (12.8%) cases of atrial fibrillation. The mean total hospital length of stay was 12±12 days, with an in-hospital mortality of 2 (1.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

A minimally invasive right thoracotomy approach to primary or re-operative double valve surgery is feasible, may be utilized with acceptable peri-operative morbidity and mortality.

Aortic valve replacement in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% performed via a minimally invasive right thoracotomy

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the outcomes of patients with aortic valve pathology in the setting of a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% who underwent minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR), with or without concomitant mitral valve (MV) surgery.

METHODS

All minimally invasive AVR in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, performed via a right thoracotomy for aortic stenosis or regurgitation between January 2009 and March 2013, were retrospectively evaluated. The operative characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and 30-day mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 75 patients identified: 51 who underwent isolated AVR, and 24 who had combined AVR plus MV surgery for moderate to severe mitral regurgitation. In patients undergoing MV surgery, there were 22 (91.7%) MV repairs [ring annuloplasty =7 (37.5%), transaortic edge-to-edge repair =15 (62.5%)], and 2 (8.3%) replacements. No patient required conversion to sternotomy for inadequate surgical field exposure. The median total mechanical ventilation time and intensive care unit length of stay were 14 (IQR, 8-20) and 42 hours (IQR, 26-93 hours) in the isolated AVR group, and 16.5 hours (IQR, 12-61.5 hours) and 95.5 hours (IQR, 43.5-159 hours) in the AVR plus MV surgery group, respectively. The most common post-operative complication was new-onset atrial fibrillation, which occurred in 15 (29.4%) isolated AVR and 4 (16.7%) AVR plus MV surgery patients. The median hospital length of stay and 30-day mortality was 7 days (IQR, 5-12 days) and 1 (2%) in the isolated AVR group, and 10.5 days (IQR, 5-21 days) and 1 (4.3%) for AVR plus MV surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with aortic valve pathology in the setting of a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, minimally invasive AVR can be performed, with or without concomitant MV surgery, with a low morbidity and mortality.

Aortic Valve Surgery: Minimally Invasive Options

Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery has not been adopted by a significant proportion of cardiac surgeons despite proven benefits. This may be related to a high learning curve and technical issues requiring retraining. In this review, we discuss the data for minimally invasive aortic valve surgery and describe our operative technique for both ministernotomy and anterior thoracotomy approaches. We also discuss the advent of novel sutureless valves and how these techniques compare to available transcatheter aortic valve procedures.

Outcomes of Totally Endoscopic Atrial Septal Defect Closure Using a Glutaraldehyde-Treated Autologous Pericardial Patch

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the outcomes of totally endoscopic minimally invasive surgery for atrial septal defect (ASD) using a glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardial patch in the transcatheter interventional era.Methods and Results:We retrospectively reviewed 37 consecutive patients who underwent totally endoscopic ASD closure with a glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardial patch between June 2011 and April 2015. All patients had been deferred from catheter-based intervention for clinical or anatomical reasons. We analyzed operative outcomes and postoperative echocardiographic data. The mean age was 45.7±16.5 years, and 25 patients (67.6%) were women. The mean ratio of pulmonary to systemic flow was 2.4±0.7. Six patients (16.2%) underwent concomitant tricuspid valve repair, and 3 patients (8.1%) underwent concomitant atrial fibrillation surgery. There were no operative deaths, and the median length of hospital stay was 5 days. Postoperative echocardiography revealed trivial residual shunt in 1 patient. During the follow-up period, there were no re-interventions for ASD or readmission for heart failure. Follow-up echocardiography revealed no recurrent shunt or calcification of the autologous pericardial patch.

CONCLUSIONS

Totally endoscopic ASD closure with a glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardial patch demonstrated excellent outcomes. It is a useful option for patients with unfavorable anatomy or other reasons excluding transcatheter intervention.

Is minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery the new benchmark for treating mitral valve disease?

The treatment of mitral valve disease remains dynamic; surgeons and patients must now choose between many different surgical options when addressing mitral regurgitation and mitral stenosis. Notably, advances in imaging and surgical instrumentation allow surgeons to perform less invasive mitral valve surgery that spares the sternum. With favorable long-term data now emerging, we compare the benefits and risks of thoracoscopic mitral valve surgery with that through conventional sternotomy or surgery that is robot-assisted.

Combined Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Surgery Performed via a Right Minithoracotomy Approach

OBJECTIVE

Combined mitral and tricuspid valve surgery is associated with an increased perioperative morbidity and mortality. We evaluated the outcomes of a less invasive right minithoracotomy approach in patients undergoing primary or reoperative double-valve surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 132 consecutive patients with mitral and tricuspid valve disease who underwent double-valve surgery via a right minithoracotomy at our institution between January 2009 and April 2014.

RESULTS

The cohort included 81 female (61%) and 51 male (39%) patients, with a mean ± SD age of 67 ± 13 years. The mean ± SD preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction, mitral regurgitation grade, and creatinine were 53% ± 12%, 3.8 ± 0.6, and 1.26 ± 1.17, respectively. The patients underwent primary (88%) or reoperative (12%) mitral and tricuspid valve surgery, which consisted of 88 mitral repairs (67%), 44 mitral replacements (33%), 131 tricuspid repairs (99%), and 1 tricuspid replacement (1%). Postoperatively, there were 6 cases of acute kidney injury (5%), 6 reoperations for bleeding (5%), 4 cerebrovascular accidents (3%), and 12 cases of atrial fibrillation (9%). The median intensive care unit length of stay and total hospital lengths of stay were 61 hours (interquartile range, 43-112 hours) and 8 days (interquartile range, 6-13 days), respectively. The in-hospital mortality was 4%. Actuarial survival at 1 and 5 years was 93% and 88%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing primary or reoperative mitral and tricuspid valve surgery, a right minithoracotomy approach is associated with a low perioperative morbidity and good midterm survival.

Right Minithoracotomy Approach for Replacement of the Ascending Aorta, Hemiarch, and Aortic Valve

A minimally invasive right anterior thoracotomy approach is the preferred technique used at our institution for isolated aortic valve pathology. We have recently introduced more complex concomitant minimally invasive procedures through this access site. Here, we describe how we perform a replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic valve with and without the use of circulatory arrest through a 6-cm right minimally invasive thoracotomy incision.

Comparison of Endoscopic Robotic versus Sternotomy Approach for the Resection of Left Atrial Tumors

Objective

Primary cardiac tumors most commonly occur in the left atrium. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes among patients undergoing isolated left atrial tumor resection via sternotomy or robotic approach.

Methods

From 2003 to 2013, 69 patients underwent isolated left atrial tumor resection at 3 affiliated hospitals with either a sternotomy (n = 39) or robotic approach (n = 30). A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed, and outcomes were compared between the sternotomy and robotic groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses controlling for pertinent preoperative characteristics were performed.

Results

Patients’ characteristics in the 2 groups were similar, with the exception of a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (sternotomy, 12.8% vs robotic, 0%; P < 0.04) and elective surgical status (sternotomy, 64.1% vs robotic, 93.3%; P < 0.02). On univariate analysis, robotic-assisted surgery was associated with significantly shorter postoperative mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and a lower rate of perioperative blood transfusion. After controlling for patient comorbidity in a multiple logistic regression model, there remained a trend toward decreased blood transfusions (adjusted odds ratio, 0.33; CI, 0.09–1.20; P = 0.09), shorter ICU (16.3 fewer hours; P = 0.11), and hospital LOS (1.1 fewer days; P = 0.17) in the robotic group. There was one postoperative stroke in the sternotomy group and none in the robotic group (P = 0.21).

Conclusions

Robotic-assisted left atrial tumor resection is feasible and may be associated with a lower incidence of perioperative blood transfusion as well as shorter ventilation time, and shorter ICU and hospital LOS.

Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery Provides Excellent Outcomes Without Increased Cost: A Multi-Institutional Analysis

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (mini-MVR) has grown in popularity. Although single centers have reported excellent outcomes, data on real-world outcomes and costs of mini-MVR are limited. Moreover, mini-MVR has been criticized as adding additional cost without clear benefit. We hypothesized that mini-MVR provides superior outcomes with incremental increased costs in a multi-institutional cohort.

METHODS

Records for patients undergoing mitral valve surgical procedures with or without atrial ablation from 2011 to 2014 were extracted from a multi-institutional, regional Society of Thoracic Surgeons database and stratified according to right chest approach/minimally invasive or conventional sternotomy. Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting or other concomitant procedures were excluded. Patients undergoing isolated mitral surgical procedure were propensity matched according to factors, including age, comorbidities, and preoperative laboratory values; clinical outcomes and cost differences were assessed by approach.

RESULTS

A total of 1,304 patients underwent mitral operations, including 425 (32.6%) by minimally invasive approach. In the propensity-matched analysis (n = 355 per group), patients undergoing mini-MVR had similar rates of mortality, stroke, and other complications compared with conventional MVR. Meanwhile, patients with mini-MVR experienced shorter intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay and fewer transfusions. Importantly, total hospital costs were no different between the two matched groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with conventional sternotomy, mini-MVR in the "real world" demonstrated no differences in rates of major morbidity, but it was associated with shorter length of stay and fewer transfusions. Contrary to our hypothesis, mini-MVR can be performed with similar total hospital costs as conventional sternotomy. In summary, minimally invasive mitral surgical procedure in select patients can provide superior outcomes without increased cost.

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery in high-risk patients: operating outside the boxplot

OBJECTIVES

(i) To establish who is at high risk for mitral surgery. (ii) To assess the performance of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery in high-risk patients by presenting early and late outcomes and compare these with those of the non-high-risk population.

METHODS

We reviewed our database of prospective data of 1873 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive mitral surgery from 2003 to 2015. To establish an unbiased definition of risk cut-off, we considered as high-risk the 'outliers of risk' identified using boxplot analysis in relation to EuroSCORE II.

RESULTS

Two hundred and five patients were outliers, with 98 as minor (EuroSCORE II ≥ 6%) and 107 as major outliers (EuroSCORE II ≥ 9%). Outliers accounted for several different comorbidities. Nineteen patients died while in hospital (9.2%); different postoperative complications were observed. Outliers had a significantly lower mean survival time and a higher risk of cardiac-related death than the general population; however, the worst outcomes were observed in major outliers. No statistically significant difference was found with regard to the need for mitral reintervention and the degree of mitral regurgitation at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Boxplot analysis helped to achieve an internal definition of risk cut-off, starting from EuroSCORE II ≥ 6%. Minimally invasive mitral surgery in these outliers of risk was associated with acceptable early and long-term results; however, major outliers with EuroSCORE II ≥ 9% may benefit from catheter-based procedures.

Aortic and/or mitral valve surgery in patients with pulmonary hypertension performed via a minimally invasive approach

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) in the setting of left-sided valvular heart disease is common, and significantly increases the risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing aortic and/or mitral valve surgery. Minimally invasive valve surgery is associated with a decreased incidence of perioperative complications, and a faster recovery, when compared with conventional sternotomy. In the present study, the outcomes of 569 patients with PH who underwent minimally invasive aortic and/or mitral valve surgery were analysed. The operative mortality was 3.5%, and postoperative strokes occurred in 1.4%. The mean intensive care unit and hospital length of stays were 50 ± 14 h and 7 ± 1 days, respectively. Patients with severe PH (mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥40 mmHg) had a longer duration of postoperative ventilation and intensive care unit length of stay, when compared with mild/moderate PH, and similar clinical outcomes. In conclusion, a minimally invasive approach to aortic and/or mitral valve surgery in patients with PH is safe and feasible, and may be considered as an alternative to conventional median sternotomy.

Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery in Truly High-Risk Patients: Are We Pushing the Boundaries?: An Observational Study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess in a retrospective series of truly high-risk patients who underwent minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: (1) postoperative and long-term results and (2) logistic EuroSCORE and EuroSCORE II discrimination power.

METHODS

Between 2003 and 2013, we reviewed in our institution patients who underwent minimally invasive mitral valve surgery with or without tricuspid valve repair via right minithoracotomy with logistic EuroSCORE of 20 or higher.

RESULTS

Among a total number of 1604, 88 patients were identified. Median logistic and EuroSCORE II was 27.29 (interquartile range, 15.3) and 12.7% (11.3%), respectively. Mean (SD) age was 71.9 (8.4) years; 42 were female (47.7%); 60 patients (68.1%) underwent previous sternotomy. Mitral valve was replaced in 59 (67%) and repaired in 29 (32.9%) patients; tricuspid valve repair was performed in 23 patients (26.1%). Median cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times were 157 minutes (interquartile range, 131-187 minutes) and 83 minutes (81-116 minutes), respectively; conversion to sternotomy and reopening for bleeding was necessary in 4 (4.5%) and 3 (3.4%) patients; permanent and transient neurological injuries were reported in 6 (6.8%) and 3 (3.4%) patients; acute kidney injury was reported in 13 patients (14.7%); 15 patients (17%) had pulmonary complications. Ten patients died while in the hospital (11.2%). Survival at 6 years was 78% (95% confidence interval, 69-88).

CONCLUSIONS

In this series of truly high-risk patients, minimally invasive mitral surgery was associated with acceptable early mortality and morbidity as well as long-term outcomes; both logistic and EuroSCORE II showed suboptimal discrimination power.

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: the "Miami Method"

For patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR), a minimally invasive approach performed via a right anterior thoracotomy is the preferred method at our institution. This method has evolved over a 10-year span, being applied to over 1,500 patients with the commitment of one surgeon seeking to offer a simplistic and reproducible minimally invasive alternative. We believe that this is truly the least invasive approach to the aortic valve since it avoids sternal invasion. By virtue of being less traumatic, the morbidity is diminished and therefore the recovery is enhanced. We believe that this approach is most beneficial in the high risk patient such as the elderly, the obese, those with chronic obstructive pulmonary, chronic kidney disease and those requiring re-operative surgery. This method has proven to be safe and effective in all patients requiring isolated AVR surgery. The only relative exclusion criteria would be a porcelain aorta with the inability to cannulate the patient.

Minimally invasive concomitant aortic and mitral valve surgery: the "Miami Method"

Valve surgery via a median sternotomy has historically been the standard of care, but in the past decade various minimally invasive approaches have gained increasing acceptance. Most data available on minimally invasive valve surgery has generally involved single valve surgery. Therefore, robust data addressing surgical techniques in patients undergoing double valve surgery is lacking. For patients undergoing combined aortic and mitral valve surgery, a minimally invasive approach, performed via a right lateral thoracotomy (the "Miami Method"), is the preferred method at our institution. This method is safe and effective and leads to an enhanced recovery in our patients given the reduction in surgical trauma. The following perspective details our surgical approach, concepts and results for combined aortic and mitral valve surgery.

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: Does it make a difference?

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) has emerged as an alternative approach to conventional sternotomy to perform mitral valve repair and replacement with equivalent results. This strategy was developed to decrease surgical trauma by minimizing the size of incisions and permits excellent exposure of the mitral valve thereby avoiding conventional full sternotomy. The purpose of this review is to provide a critical, objective, balanced, and evidence-based analysis of the literature to understand advantages, potential scope, and the utility of these minimally invasive approaches to the mitral valve in modern cardiac care.

Outcomes of Aortic Valve and Concomitant Ascending Aorta Replacement Performed via a Minimally Invasive Right Thoracotomy Approach

Objective

Replacement of the aortic valve with concomitant replacement of the ascending aorta performed via a minimally invasive right anterior thoracotomy approach has not been reported. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of this procedure.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all minimally invasive aortic valve replacements (AVRs) with concomitant replacement of the ascending aorta performed at our institution between January 1, 2012, and December 30, 2012. The operative times, intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay, postoperative outcomes, as well as mortality were analyzed.

Results

A total of 20 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive AVR with concomitant replacement of the ascending aorta were identified. There were 16 men (80%), with a mean (SD) age of 61 (13) years. The mean (SD) left ventricular ejection fraction was 58% (8%). The aortic valve was bicuspid in 18 patients (80%), with 14 (70%) being stenotic. The median aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 163 [interquartile range (IQR), 141–170] minutes and 291 (IQR, 177–215) minutes, respectively. Hypothermic circulatory arrest was required in 19 patients (95%), with a median hypothermic circulatory arrest time of 35 (IQR, 33–39.5) minutes. The median intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay were 24 (IQR, 23–41) hours and 5 (IQR, 4–6) days, respectively. There were no strokes, reoperations for bleeding, or conversions to sternotomy. The 30-day mortality was zero.

Conclusions

Minimally invasive AVR with concomitant replacement of the ascending aorta, via a right anterior thoracotomy approach, can be performed with low morbidity and mortality.

Current status of surgical treatment for aortic valve stenosis

In this review, we discuss the current surgical treatment for aortic valve stenosis. Surgical strategy for treatment of aortic valve stenosis is based on the risk profile of the patient. We reviewed the existing literature and present the current state of the art of these various approaches, taking into account clinical outcomes, quality of life, costs, and learning curve.

Endoscopic thyroidectomy is safe in patients with a high body mass index

BACKGROUND

Obesity is associated with a number of medical comorbidities and is considered a risk factor for surgical complications. However, the impact of obesity on the safety of minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) has not been well defined. We sought to determine the relationship between obesity and the risk of complications in patients undergoing MIVAT.

METHOD

A prospectively maintained database of all thyroid surgeries performed from January 2006 through June 2012 was searched and all cases of MIVAT were identified. Patients were stratified into three body mass index (BMI) groups according to the National Institutes of Health classification for obesity: normal (BMI ≤ 24.9 kg/m(2)), overweight (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m(2)) and obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2)). The total number of complications was compared among the three groups, and MIVAT patients were also compared to a cohort of patients undergoing conventional thyroid surgery.

RESULTS

There were 233 MIVATs performed on 223 patients. The mean overall BMI for the study population was 25.4 kg/m(2). There were 123 procedures (52.8%) in the normal group, 76 procedures (32.6%) in the overweight group, and 34 procedures (14.6%) in the obese group. Complications included 1 case of cellulitis (0.4%), 6 cases of temporary hypocalcemia (2.6%), and 6 cases of transient vocal fold paresis (2.6%). No patients suffered permanent hypocalcemia or a permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. There were 9 complications in the normal group (7.3%), 4 complications in the overweight group (5.3%), and no complications in the obese group. Due to the low number of complications in this series, the overweight and obese groups were combined into a high BMI group for further analysis. Statistical analysis using simple logistic regression models revealed that there was no significant difference in the number of complications in patients with a high BMI compared with patients with a normal BMI (odds ratio [OR] 0.48 [confidence interval (CI) 0.14-1.63], p=0.2). The MIVAT group had fewer overall complications than the conventional thyroidectomy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Overweight and obese patients undergoing MIVAT in this series were not at an increased risk for surgical complications. The MIVAT procedure may be considered safe in patients with a high BMI, who may derive particular benefit from a minimally invasive approach.

Hybrid approach of percutaneous coronary intervention followed by minimally invasive valve operations

BACKGROUND

A subset of patients requiring coronary revascularization and valve operations may benefit from a hybrid approach of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) followed by a minimally invasive valve operation, rather than the standard combined median sternotomy coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and a valve operation. This study sought to evaluate the outcomes of this approach in a heterogeneous group of patients with concomitant coronary artery and valvular disease.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 222 consecutive patients with coronary artery and valvular heart disease who underwent PCI followed by elective minimally invasive valve operations at our institution between February 2009 and August 2013.

RESULTS

A total of 136 men and 86 women were identified. The mean age was 74.6 ± 8.2 years, with 181 (81.5%) undergoing 1-vessel, 27 (12.2%) undergoing 2-vessel, and 14 (6.3%) undergoing 3-vessel PCI. Within a median of 38 days (interquartile range [IQR] 18-65 days), 182 (82%) patients underwent primary and 34 (15.3%) underwent repeated valve operations, which consisted of 185 (83.3%) single-valve and 37 (16.7%) double-valve procedures. Operative mortality occurred in 8 patients (3.6%). At a mean follow-up of 16.2 ± 12 months, 6 patients required PCI, with target-vessel revascularization performed in 4 patients (2.1%). Survival at 1 and 4.5 years was 91.9% and 88.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In a heterogeneous group of patients, a hybrid approach of PCI followed by minimally invasive valve operations in patients undergoing primary or repeated valve operations can be performed with excellent outcomes.

Minimally invasive valve surgery with bypass to the right coronary artery

Herein, we report the case of a 60-year-old woman who presented with increasing dyspnea on exertion. Echocardiography revealed significant aortic and mitral regurgitation, which were most likely secondary to previous radiation therapy for breast cancer. On cardiac catheterization a 90% ostial right coronary artery lesion was found and treated with a drug-eluting stent. During minimally invasive valve surgery, via a right anterior thoracotomy, it was noted that the stent had restenosed. Therefore, the right coronary artery was bypassed with a segment of venous graft through the same incision.

Minimally invasive mitral valve procedures: the current state

Since its early days, cardiac surgery has typically involved large incisions with complete access to the heart and the great vessels. After the popularization of the minimally invasive techniques in general surgery, cardiac surgeons began to experiment with minimal access techniques in the early 1990s. Although the goals of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) are fairly well established as decreased pain, shorter hospital stay, accelerated recuperation, improved cosmesis, and cost effectiveness, a strict definition of minimally invasive cardiac surgery has been more elusive. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery started with mitral valve procedures and then gradually expanded towards other valve procedures, coronary artery bypass grafting, and various types of simple congenital heart procedures. In this paper, the authors attempt to focus on the evolution, techniques, results, and the future perspective of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS).