High alloreactivity of low-dose prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion in patients with acute leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with an alemtuzumab-containing conditioning regimen

New strategies of DLI in the management of relapse of hematological malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT

DLI is an effective strategy for patients with recurrent hematological malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (allo-HSCT). DLI has been widely applied to boost the graft vs tumor (GVT) or GVL effects. However, given the potentially severe complications associated with conventional DLI and transient GVL effect, new strategies for DLI are emerging. In this review, we have discussed the recent important studies on DLI as a prophylactic or therapeutic modality for relapsed hematological disorders after allo-HSCT. The strategies to separate GVL from GVHD have also been discussed. Leukemia-targeting therapy and lymphodepletion combined with DLI, and prophylactic DLI after allo-HSCT are often employed for patients with high risk of relapse, which has been reviewed as well. In addition, we have also discussed the issues on DLI to be further addressed, such as the doses, timing and frequency of DLI in different clinical settings, leukemic antigen-specific DLI as well as how to augment GVL effect while attenuating GVHD.

Adoptive Immunotherapies After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative therapy for patients with chemotherapy-resistant hematologic malignancies that are usually fatal in absence of treatment. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is associated with significant early and late morbidity and mortality. Graft-versus-host disease, infections, and relapse are the most important causes of mortality after HSCT. Until now, these complications have been managed mainly with pharmacological drugs, but in some situations, this approach clearly shows its limit. As such, there is a significant need for novel therapies for the treatment of complications after allogeneic HSCT. In this review, the currently available adoptive immunotherapies offering an alternative in case of treatment failure of HSCT complications will be described. The results of the main clinical trials based on immune cell infusion will be discussed and the strategies aiming at maximizing cytotoxic T-lymphocyte, regulatory T-cell, natural killer cell, cytokine-induced killer cell, and γδ T-cell efficacies in the context of immunotherapy approaches after allogeneic HSCT in patients with hematologic malignancies will be gathered.

Immunotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia

Despite the remarkable progress made in some leukemias such as CML and CLL, cytotoxic treatment for AML remains essentially unchanged over the last 4 decades. Several lines of evidence, including the graft versus leukemia effect associated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), suggest that immunotherapy is an active modality in AML. Given the lack of progress for chemotherapy in this disease, many novel immunologic treatment approaches have been explored. The goals of non-transplant-based immune approaches have largely consisted of the stimulation or restoration of endogenous immune responses or the targeting of specific tumor antigens by immune cells. These strategies have been associated with less toxicity than allogeneic HSCT but typically have inferior efficacy. Allogeneic HSCT exploits major and minor histocompatibility differences between the donor and recipient in order to recognize and eradicate malignancy. With the recognition that the immune system itself provides a basis for treating AML, immunotherapy continues to be an attractive modality to exploit in the treatment of this disease.

Reduced-intensity conditioned allogeneic SCT in adults with AML

AML is currently the most common indication for reduced-intensity conditioned (RIC) allo-SCT. Reduced-intensity regimens allow a potent GVL response to occur with minimized treatment-related toxicity in patients of older age or with comorbidities that preclude the use of myeloablative conditioning. Whether RIC SCT is appropriate for younger and more standard risk patients is not well defined and the field is changing rapidly; a prospective randomized trial of myeloablative vs RIC (BMT-CTN 0901) was recently closed when early results indicated better outcomes for myeloablative regimens. However, detailed results are not available, and all patients in that study were eligible for myeloablative conditioning. RIC transplants will likely remain the standard of care as many patients with AML are not eligible for myeloablative conditioning. Recent publication of mature results from retrospective and prospective cohorts provide contemporary efficacy and toxicity data for these attenuated regimens. In addition, recent studies explore the use of alternative donors, introduce regimens that attempt to reduce toxicity without reducing intensity, and identify predictive factors that pave the way to personalized approaches. These studies paint a picture of the future of RIC transplants. Here we review the current status of RIC allogeneic SCT in AML.

A comparative study of reduced dose alemtuzumab in matched unrelated donor and related donor reduced intensity transplants

In vivo T cell depletion with 100 mg alemtuzumab prevents graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in reduced intensity conditioned transplants but is associated with delayed immune reconstitution, a higher risk of infection and relapse. De-escalation studies have shown that a reduced dose of 30 mg is as effective as 100 mg in preventing GVHD in matched related donor (MRD) transplants. Dose reduction in matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplants is feasible but the comparative efficacy of alemtuzumab in this setting is not known and opinions vary widely concerning the optimal level of GVHD prophylaxis that should be achieved. Through retrospective analysis we made an objective comparison of MUD transplants receiving an empirically reduced dose of 60 mg, with MRD transplants receiving a 30 mg dose. We observed proportionate levels of alemtuzumab according to dose but an inverse relationship with body surface area particularly in MRD transplants. MUD transplants experienced more acute and chronic GVHD, higher T cell chimerism, more sustained use of ciclosporin and less need for donor lymphocyte infusion than MRD transplants. Thus, doubling the dose of alemtuzumab to 60 mg did not provide equivalent prevention of GVHD after MUD transplant although there was no difference in non-relapse mortality or survival compared with MRD transplants.

Prophylaxis and treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia remains a major cause of death in patients following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Several factors may affect the concurrence and outcome of relapse, which include graft-versus-host disease, minimal residual disease or intrinsic factors of the disease, and transplantation characteristics. The mainstay of relapse prevention and treatment is donor leukocyte infusions, targeted therapies, second transplantation, and other novel therapies. In this review, we mainly focus on addressing the impact of graft-versus-host disease on relapse and the prophylaxis and treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia relapse following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We also make recommendations for critical strategies to prevent relapse after transplantation and challenges that must be addressed to ensure success.

Maximizing GVL in allogeneic transplantation: role of donor lymphocyte infusions

Donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) can induce complete and durable remissions in some patients with hematologic malignancies who have relapsed after allogeneic transplantation, providing definitive evidence of a GVL effect. Despite the great promise initially envisioned for DLI as a method to augment GVL after transplantation, it utility is limited by low response rates in diseases other than chronic myelogenous leukemia and by the development of GVHD, the principal complication of DLI. To maximize GVL potency while minimizing toxicity, cellular effectors active in GVL need to be elucidated. Insight into mechanisms of GVL, such as reversal of in situ T-cell exhaustion, may allow identification of patients who will respond to DLI based on the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in the BM. Understanding the clinical factors that influence the effectiveness and abrogate the toxicity of DLI, such as cell dose and timing of DLI after transplantation, will allow further optimization of DLI. This chapter reviews novel strategies that maximize the GVL effect of DLI by enhancing activity while limiting toxicity.

A multicentre UK study of GVHD following DLI: rates of GVHD are high but mortality from GVHD is infrequent

DLIs are frequently used following haematopoietic SCT (HSCT) in patients with risk of relapse but data on GVHD following DLI are scarce. We report on 68 patients who received DLI following HSCT. Most patients developed GVHD following DLI (71%), which was acute in 22 patients (32%) almost half of whom had grade III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD). Thirty patients (44%) developed cGVHD which followed aGVHD in four patients and was graded severe in nine patients. Corticosteroids were the most common first-line therapy for both acute and chronic GVHD. A wide range of second/third-line agents included cyclosporin, mycophenolate, tacrolimus, imatinib, infliximab and ECP. Relapse of initial malignancy occurred in 37%. Relapse was significantly less frequent in those receiving pre-emptive DLI. Relapse rates were also lower in those with GVHD (31%) than those without GVHD (50%), but this did not reach statistical significance. At 55 months post DLI, 34% of patients had died most commonly from relapse and 22% had on-going GVHD. Although GVHD was an important cause of morbidity post DLI (71%), only 6% died from GVHD. Although most patients develop GVHD post DLI and may require consecutive therapies, mortality from GVHD is infrequent. DLI remains an important option for relapse post transplant and manipulation of the GVT effect needs to be optimised to induce remission without morbidity from GVHD.

The expanding horizon of immunotherapy in the treatment of malignant disorders: allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and beyond

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is a very effective therapeutic modality with curative potential in patients with hematological malignancies. The therapeutic efficacy is mainly based on the alloreactive reaction of donor lymphocytes against malignant cells of the recipient named as 'graft-versus-leukemia' or 'graft-versus-tumor' (GVL, GVT) effect. However, besides the beneficial GVL effect, alloreactive reaction attacks normal cells and provokes the deleterious 'graft-versus-host disease' (GVHD) which represents the major limitation of allo-SCT. Current trials have focused on a dual goal: augmentation of GVL and complete abolishment of GVHD. From a theoretical point of view complete dissociation of GVL from GVHD can occur by selecting antigenic targets present on malignant and absent from normal cells. Hematopoietic tissue-restricted minor histocompatibility antigens and leukemia or tumor-associated antigens are ideal candidates for tumor-targeted immunotherapy. Other options for inducing anti-tumor immunity in the absence of GVHD are natural killer (NK) cell immunotherapy, amplification of immune responses by using monoclonal antibodies, and bispecific T and NK-cell engagers. Genetically modified immune effectors such as T-cells armed with chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) or transduced with T-cell receptors with anti-tumor specificity are another exciting field of immunotherapy against malignancies.

Early donor chimerism levels predict relapse and survival after allogeneic stem cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning

The success of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) is limited by a high rate of disease relapse. Early risk assessment could potentially improve outcomes by identifying appropriate patients for preemptive strategies that may ameliorate this high risk. Using a series of landmark analyses, we investigated the predictive value of early (day-30) donor chimerism measurements on disease relapse, graft-versus-host disease, and survival in a cohort of 121 patients allografted with a uniform RIC regimen. Chimerism levels were analyzed as continuous variables. In multivariate analysis, day-30 whole blood chimerism levels were significantly associated with relapse (hazard ratio [HR] = .90, P < .001), relapse-free survival (HR = .89, P < .001), and overall survival (HR = .94, P = .01). Day-30 T cell chimerism levels were also significantly associated with relapse (HR = .97, P = .002), relapse-free survival (HR = .97, P < .001), and overall survival (HR = .99, P = .05). Multivariate models that included T cell chimerism provided a better prediction for these outcomes compared with whole blood chimerism. Day-30 chimerism levels were not associated with acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease. We found that high donor chimerism levels were significantly associated with a low lymphocyte count in the recipient before transplant, highlighting the impact of pretransplant lymphopenia on the kinetics of engraftment after RIC HSCT. In summary, low donor chimerism levels are associated with relapse and mortality and can potentially be used as an early predictive and prognostic marker. These findings can be used to design novel approaches to prevent relapse and to improve survival after RIC HSCT.

Comparison of chimerism and minimal residual disease monitoring for relapse prediction after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Little data are available on the relative merits of chimerism and minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring for relapse prediction after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). We performed a retrospective analysis of serial chimerism assessments in 101 adult HCT recipients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and of serial MRD assessments in a subgroup of 22 patients. All patients had received myeloablative conditioning. The cumulative incidence of relapse was significantly higher in the patients with increasing mixed chimerism (in-MC) compared with those with complete chimerism, low-level MC, and decreasing MC, but the sensitivity of in-MC detection with regard to relapse prediction was only modest. In contrast, MRD assessment was highly sensitive and specific. Patients with MRD positivity after HCT had the highest incidence of relapse among all prognostic groups analyzed. The median time from MRD positivity to relapse was longer than the median time from detection of in-MC, but in some cases in-MC preceded MRD positivity. We conclude that MRD assessment is a powerful prognostic tool that should be included in the routine post-transplantation monitoring of patients with ALL, but chimerism analysis may provide additional information in some cases. Integration of these tools and clinical judgment should allow optimal decision making with regard to post-transplantation therapeutic interventions.

Impact of in vivo T-cell depletion on outcome of AML patients in first CR given peripheral blood stem cells and reduced-intensity conditioning allo-SCT from a HLA-identical sibling donor: a report from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

The impact of in vivo T-cell depletion on transplantation outcomes in patients transplanted with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) remains controversial. This study assessed the outcome of 1250 adult patients with de novo AML in first CR (CR1) given PBSC from HLA-identical siblings after chemotherapy-based RIC. A total of 554 patients did not receive any form of in vivo T-cell depletion (control group), whereas antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and alemtuzumab were given in 444 and 252 patients, respectively. The incidences of grade II-IV acute GVHD were 21.4, 17.6 and 10.2% in control, ATG and alemtuzumab patients, respectively (P<0.001). In multivariate analysis, the use of ATG and the use of alemtuzumab were each associated with a lower risk of chronic GVHD (P<0.001 each), but a similar risk of relapse, and of nonrelapse mortality, and similar leukemia-free survival and OS. Further, among patients given BU-based RIC, the use of <6 mg/kg ATG did not increase the risk of relapse (hazard ratio, HR=1.1), whereas there was a suggestion for higher relapse risk in patients given 6 mg/kg ATG (HR=1.4, P=0.08). In summary, these data suggest that a certain amount of in vivo T-cell depletion can be safely used in the conditioning of AML patients in CR1 given PBSC after chemotherapy-based RIC.

Pilot study of prophylactic ex vivo costimulated donor leukocyte infusion after reduced-intensity conditioned allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Donor leukocyte infusion (DLI) can induce potent graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) activity in patients with relapsed hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Unfortunately, except in patients with chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia, responses to DLI have been disappointing. GVL induction is likely to be most effective in the setting of minimal residual disease. Prevention of relapse through the provision of prophylactic DLI to high-risk patients may improve the outcome of allogeneic HSCT. We previously reported that ex vivo costimulated T cell infusion of activated DLI (aDLI) as treatment for relapse is safe and has potent GVL effects. We hypothesized that prophylactic aDLI can be given safely and prevent relapse in high-risk patients after allogeneic HSCT. Eighteen patients with acute myeolgenous leukemia (n = 14), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 3), or myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 1) underwent allogeneic HSCT after a reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen with alemtuzumab, fludarabine, and busulfan. Graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus and methotrexate with a planned early and rapid taper of tacrolimus. Patients without GVHD, off immune suppression, and in remission received aDLI at a dose of 1 × 10(7) CD3(+) cells/kg (aDLI 1) at day +120, followed by a second infusion of 1 × 10(8) CD3 cells/kg (aDLI 2) at day +180. At a median follow-up of 58 months, 5 of the 18 patients (28%) were alive, and 4 patients were in remission. Eleven patients (65%) relapsed, at a median time of 191 days. Twelve of the 18 patients received at least one aDLI, and 6 of these 12 patients also received aDLI 2. Six patients did not receive any aDLI owing to early relapse (n = 2), protocol ineligibility (n = 1), or GVHD (n = 3). Only 2 of the 12 patients who received aDLI 1 developed GVHD. Two out of the 12 patients remain in remission at the time of this report. Disease recurrence was the cause of death in 10 of the 13 patients (77%) who died. Our data indicate that prophylactic ex vivo costimulated CD3/CD28 DLI is safe, feasible, and not associated with significant GVHD. Relapse remains the major cause of treatment failure after RIC HSCT even with rapid withdrawal of immune suppression and the use of prophylactic aDLI, and better strategies to prevent relapse are needed.