Independent prognostic effect of co-morbidity in lymphoma patients: results of the population-based Eindhoven Cancer Registry

Social inequality in incidence of and survival from cancer in a population-based study in Denmark, 1994-2003: Summary of findings

The purpose of this nationwide, population register-based study was to describe variations in cancer incidence and survival by social position in a social welfare state, Denmark, on the basis of a range of socioeconomic, demographic and health-related indicators. Our study population comprised all 3.22 million Danish residents born in 1925-1973 and aged >or=30 years, who were followed up for cancer incidence in 1994-2003 and for survival in 1994-2006, yielding 147,973 cancers. The incidence increased with lower education and income, especially for tobacco- and other lifestyle-related cancers, although for cancers of the breast and prostate and malignant melanoma the association was inverse. Conversely there was a general increase in incidence among early retirement pensioners, persons living in rented housing and those living in the smallest dwellings. Also incidence rates were generally higher in persons living alone compared to those living with a partner and in the capital area compared to the rural areas. Social inequality in the prognosis of most cancers was observed, despite the equal access to health care in Denmark, with poorer relative survival related to fewer advantages, regardless of how they were measured, often most pronounced in the first year after diagnosis. Also living alone and having somatic or psychiatric comorbidity negatively impacted the relative survival after most cancers. Our study shows that inequalities in cancer incidence and survival must be addressed in all aspects of public health, with interventions both to reduce incidence and to prolong survival.

Treatment and survival in a population-based sample of patients diagnosed with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma

AIM

To examine the extent of use of specific therapies in clinical practice, and their relationship to therapies validated in clinical trials.

METHODS

The US National Cancer Institutes' Patterns of Care study was used to examine therapies and survival of patients diagnosed in 2001 with histologically-confirmed gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (n = 1356). The study re-abstracted data and verified therapy with treating physicians for a population-based stratified random sample.

RESULTS

Approximately 62% of patients had stomach adenocarcinoma (SAC), while 22% had gastric-cardia adenocarcinoma (GCA), and 16% lower esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Stage IV/unstaged esophageal cancer patients were most likely and stage I-III stomach cancer patients least likely to receive chemotherapy as all or part of their therapy; gastric-cardia patients received chemotherapy at a rate between these two. In multivariable analysis by anatomic site, patients 70 years and older were significantly less likely than younger patients to receive chemotherapy alone or chemoradiation for all three anatomic sites. Among esophageal and stomach cancer patients, receipt of chemotherapy was associated with lower mortality; but no association was found among gastric-cardia patients.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the relatively low use of clinical trials-validated anti-cancer therapies in community practice. Use of chemotherapy-based treatment was associated with lower mortality, dependent on anatomic site. Findings suggest that physicians treat lower esophageal and SAC as two distinct entities, while gastric-cardia patients receive a mix of the treatment strategies employed for the two other sites.

Ongoing improvement in long-term survival of patients with Hodgkin disease at all ages and recent catch-up of older patients

Since the breakthroughs in combination chemotherapy of patients with Hodgkin disease (HD) starting in the 1960s, prognosis of patients has been rising steadily. Trends in long-term survival of patients with HD on the population level should therefore be monitored in an as timely as possible manner. We assessed trends in age specific 5- and 10-year relative survival of patients with HD in the United States from 1980-1984 to 2000-2004 from the 1973-2004 database of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Period analysis was used to disclose recent developments with minimum delay. Overall, 5-year relative survival steadily increased from 73.5% to 85.2% (+11.7 percentage units), and 10-year relative survival increased from 62.1% to 80.1% (+18.0 percentage units) between 1980-1984 and 2000-2004, according to period analysis. The increase was particularly pronounced for patients aged 45 to 59 years and 60 years and older (increases in 10-year relative survival by 24.8 and 23.3 percentage points, respectively). Nevertheless, a strong age gradient persisted, with 10-year relative survival of 92.7%, 88.7%, 84.9%, 76.2%, and 44.9% in patients aged 15 to 24 years, 25 to 34 years, 35 to 44 years, 45 to 54 years, and 60 years and older, respectively, in 2000-2004. Our period analysis discloses ongoing, major improvement in long-term survival of patients with HD in recent years, particularly among older patients.

Outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with nonmyeloablative or myeloablative conditioning regimens for treatment of lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Allogeneic conventional hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can be curative treatment for lymphoid malignancies, but it has been characterized by high nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Here, we compared outcomes among patients with lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia given either nonmyeloablative (n = 152) or myeloablative (n = 68) conditioning. Outcomes were stratified by the HCT-specific comorbidity index. Patients in the nonmyeloablative group were older, had more previous treatment and more comorbidities, more frequently had unrelated donors, and more often had malignancy in remission compared with patients in the myeloablative group. Patients with indolent versus aggressive malignancies were equally distributed among both cohorts. After HCT, patients without comorbidities both in the nonmyeloablative and myeloablative cohorts had comparable NRM (P = .74), overall survival (P = .75), and progression-free survival (P = .40). No significant differences were observed (P = .91, P = .89, and P = .40, respectively) after adjustment for pretransplantation variables. Patients with comorbidities experienced lower NRM (P = .009) and better survival (P = .04) after nonmyeloablative conditioning. These differences became more significant (P < .001 and .007, respectively) after adjustment for other variables. Further, nonmyeloablative patients with comorbidities had favorable adjusted progression-free survival (P = .01). Patients without comorbidities could be enrolled in prospective randomized studies comparing different conditioning intensities. Younger patients with comorbidities might benefit from reduced conditioning intensity.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation specific comorbidity index as an outcome predictor for patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: combined FHCRC and MDACC experiences

A new hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) was effective in predicting outcomes among patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent HCT at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC). Here, we compared the performance of the HCT-CI to 2 other indices and then tested its capacity to predict outcomes among 2 cohorts of patients diagnosed with a single disease entity, acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission, who underwent transplantation at either FHCRC or M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC). FHCRC patients less frequently had unfavorable cytogenetics (15% versus 36%) and HCT-CI scores of 3 or more (21% versus 58%) compared with MDACC patients. We found that the HCT-CI had higher sensitivity and outcome predictability compared with the other indices among both cohorts. HCT-CI scores of 0, 1 to 2, and 3 or more predicted comparable nonrelapse mortality (NRM) among FHCRC and MDACC patients. In multivariate models, HCT-CI scores were associated with the highest hazard ratios (HRS) for NRM and survival among each cohort. The 2-year survival rates among FHCRC and MDACC patients were 71% versus 56%, respectively. After adjustment for risk factors, including HCT-CI scores, no difference in survival was detected (HR: 0.98, P = .94). The HCT-CI is a sensitive and informative tool for comparing trial results at different institutions. Inclusion of comorbidity data in HCT trials provides valuable, independent information.

Trends in population-based cancer survival in Germany: to what extent does progress reach older patients?

BACKGROUND

The ageing of populations makes outcome monitoring among elderly cancer patients particularly important.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using data from the population-based Cancer Registry of Saarland, we examined age-specific trends in 5-year relative survival from 1979 to 2003 for patients with 15 common cancers in Germany. Model-based period analysis was applied to estimate 5-year relative survival for four age groups (15-54, 55-64, 65-74, 75+) in the periods 1979-1983, 1984-1988, 1989-1993, 1994-1998, and 1999-2003.

RESULTS

Overall, 5-year relative survival improved steadily from 42.2% in 1979-1983 to 56.7% in 1999-2003. From the youngest to the oldest age group, 5-year relative survival increased by 14.5, 12.1, 12.5, and 8.4 percent units, respectively, after adjusting for changes in the spectrum of cancer sites, and survival significantly improved for 10, 12, 11, and 5 cancer sites, respectively. The age gradient particularly increased for cancer sites with major progress in chemotherapeutic treatment regimens, such as ovarian cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and leukemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Relative survival of cancer patients increased considerably for many forms of cancer in Germany from 1979 to 2003. Increases were much less pronounced among elderly patients, leading to an increasing age gradient in prognosis.

Report on the 1st International Workshop of the German Competence Network Malignant Lymphomas

The German Competence Network Malignant Lymphomas (KML) is an initiative of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research with the goal of establishing a cooperative network between lymphoma study groups to support clinical lymphoma research. The network was initiated in 1999 and comprises 9 national lymphoma study groups. More than 8,600 patients are recruited every year into currently 55 clinical trials by more than 2,400 centers in Germany and Europe. It was the specific aim of the 1st international workshop of the KML (March 6 and 7, 2006) in Cologne to bring together international specialists in the field of lymphoma to discuss current concepts of lymphoma pathogenesis and treatment strategies. This report summarizes novel aspects of pathogenesis and targeted approaches, maintenance therapy, management of the elderly patients, and the use of positron emission tomography for clinical decision making.

Patterns of care and effects on mortality for cancers of the oesophagus and gastric cardia: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

We investigated temporal trends in treatment, and factors influencing treatment receipt and survival, for upper gastrointestinal cancers in routine community-based clinical practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Oesophageal and gastric-cardia cancers, diagnosed during the period 1994-2001, were sourced from the National Cancer Registry (Ireland). Analysis was by Joinpoint regression and multivariate logistic and Cox models.

RESULTS

Thirty-five percent of patients received surgery, 35% radiotherapy and 24% chemotherapy. Over time chemo- and radiotherapy receipt increased significantly, whilst surgery decreased. Treatment patterns varied by tumour site, histology and stage. Older and/or unmarried patients were significantly less likely to receive treatment. Among surgically treated patients, those aged 70+ had higher mortality. Among both surgical and non-surgical patients, those receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy had a modest, short-term, survival benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of adjuvant therapies is increasing in routine practice. After adjusting for clinical factors, patient-related factors predicted treatment and mortality. Improving equity in gastrointestinal cancer treatment may help improve survival.

Treatment and survival for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: Influence of histological subtype, age, and other factors in a population-based study (1999–2001)

AIMS

This population-based study investigates the use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) treatment in clinical practise generally, and for specific histologies, and identifies factors associated with treatment and survival.

METHODS

Data for NHL patients, diagnosed during 1999-2001, were obtained from the National Cancer Registry (Ireland). Multivariate models were analysed on survival and treatment.

RESULTS

45-77% of patients received chemotherapy, 22-34% of patients received the radiotherapy, depending on the histology. Patients aged <65, married, with early stage B-cell aggressive disease were more likely to receive chemotherapy (P<0.05). Patients >65 or with advanced stage were less likely to receive radiation (P<0.05). Survival was poorer in older (P<0.001) and unmarried patients (P<0.05), and those with B-cell aggressive lymphoma (P<0.001). Patients who received chemotherapy and radiation had lower hazard ratios.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the use of chemotherapy and radiation in this European population was similar to the findings in the US where older patients received treatment less often. However, the age disparity here was greater than that in the US.

Hodgkin disease survival in Europe and the U.S

BACKGROUND

The survival of patients with Hodgkin disease (HD) varies markedly across Europe and generally is shorter than the survival of patients in the U.S. To investigate these differences, the authors compared population-based HD survival in relation to morphologic type among populations in Europe and the U.S.

METHODS

The authors analyzed 6726 patients from 37 cancer registries that participated in EUROCARE-3 and 3442 patients from 9 U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries. Patients were diagnosed during 1990 to 1994 and were followed for at least 5 years. The European registries were grouped into EUROCARE West, EUROCARE UK, and EUROCARE East. Morphologic groups were nodular sclerosis, mixed cellularity, lymphocyte depletion, lymphocyte predominance, and not otherwise specified (NOS). The influence of morphology on geographic differences in 5-year relative survival was explored by using multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS

In the model that was adjusted by age, gender, and years since diagnosis, the relative excess risk (RER) of death was 0.93 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.81-1.05) in EUROCARE West, 1.15 (95% CI, 1.04-1.28) in EUROCARE UK, and 1.39 (95% CI, 1.21-1.60) in EUROCARE East (compared with the SEER data). When morphology was included, EUROCARE UK and SEER no longer differed (RER, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.95-1.18). Morphology distribution varied markedly across Europe and much less in the U.S., with nodular sclerosis less common in Europe (45.9%) than the U.S. (61.7%). The RER data showed that patients who had lymphocyte depletion, NOS, and mixed cellularity had a significantly worse prognoses compared with patients who had nodular sclerosis, whereas patients who had lymphocyte predominance had the best prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results provide population-based evidence that morphology strongly influences the prognosis of patients with HD. However differences in the morphologic case mix explains only some of the geographic variations observed in survival.

The influence of age and comorbidity on receiving radiotherapy as part of primary treatment for cancer in South Netherlands, 1995 to 2002

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to study the influence of age and comorbidity on receiving radiotherapy (RT) in primary treatment of cancer.

METHODS

In a population-based setting, the authors calculated the proportion of irradiated patients within 6 months after they received a diagnosis of lung, rectal, breast, or prostate cancer or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 33,369 patients) according to age and comorbidity between 1995 and 2002. Logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for age, comorbidity, gender, and stage.

RESULTS

Patients with localized nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ages 65 years to > or = 80 years or with comorbid conditions received RT alone significantly more often compared with younger patients (ages 65-79 years: odds ratio [OR], 3.4; age > or = 80: OR, 12.0) and patients without comorbidities (1 comorbid condition: OR, 2.1; > or = 2 comorbid conditions: OR, 2.4). This also applied to patients with nonlocalized NSCLC ages 65 years to 79 years compared with younger patients (OR, 1.4). RT was administered significantly less often to elderly patients with resected rectal cancers (ages 65-79 years: OR, 0.7; age > or = 80 years: OR, 0.4), patients age > or = 80 years with breast cancer after undergoing conserving surgery (OR, 0.1), and patients age > or = 80 years with clinical T1-T3,N0,M0 prostate cancer age (OR, 0.1) compared with younger patients. Patients with breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery received RT significantly less often in the presence of comorbidities (1 comorbid condition: OR, 0.6; > or = 2 comorbid conditions: OR, 0.4). Older patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma received only RT as treatment significantly more often compared with younger patients (OR, 3.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Comorbidity and age did have influence over whether patients received RT, although, for most tumor types, age appeared to be a stronger predicting factor. Under treatment was observed among patients with breast cancer and rectal cancer.

Prognostic impact of increasing age and co-morbidity in cancer patients: A population-based approach

This large population-based study focuses on the prognostic role of increasing age and co-morbidity in cancer patients diagnosed in the southern Netherlands. Data of patients diagnosed between 1995 and 2002 and recorded in the population-based Eindhoven Cancer Registry were used. Older patients (with serious co-morbidity) with non-small cell lung cancer or prostate cancer underwent surgery less often than younger patients. Elderly with stage III colon cancer, small cell lung cancer, FIGO II or III ovarian cancer or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) received (adjuvant) chemotherapy less often, probably because of the higher rate of haematological complications. Administration of adjuvant radiotherapy decreased with age and co-morbidity in patients with rectal cancer, limited small cell lung cancer or breast cancer. In general, elderly did not suffer from more complications than younger patients, except for cardiac complications (colorectal cancer and NHL) and postoperative death (non-small cell lung cancer). For most tumours relative survival was lower for the elderly, except for patients with colon cancer, prostate cancer or indolent NHL. Co-morbidity had an independent prognostic effect, except for tumours with a very poor prognosis. Future prospective studies should investigate whether the guidelines for cancer treatment should be adjusted for elderly with serious co-morbidity.