51
|
Hu SB, Liu CH, Wang X, Dong YW, Zhao L, Liu HF, Cao Y, Zhong DR, Liu W, Li YL, Gao WS, Bai CM, Shang ZH, Li XY. Pathological evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. World J Surg Oncol 2019; 17:3. [PMID: 30606195 PMCID: PMC6317221 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-018-1534-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2018] [Accepted: 11/28/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Although pathological evaluation has been considered an effective evaluation method, some problems still exist in practice. Therefore, we explored whether there are more reasonable and practical pathological evaluation criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Here, we aim to determine pathological judgment criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods Eighty-seven patients with cT2–4 or cN+ were enrolled in this study. Pathological factors for overall survival (OS) were investigated using univariate and multivariate analyses, and the pathological criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy were then determined. Results A total of 87 patients underwent 3–4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with 67 (77.0%), 15 (17.2%), and 5 (5.8%) receiving Folfox6, Xelox, and SOX regimens, respectively. All patients showed different levels of graded histological regression (GHR) of the primary tumor, with a ≥ 50% regression rate of 50.6%. The univariate analysis showed that GHR ≥ 50% (p = 0.022), 66.7% (p = 0.013), and 90% (p = 0.028) were significantly correlated with OS. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that ypTNM (II/III) stage was significantly associated with OS compared with ypTNM (0+I) stage [HR = 3.553, 95% CI 1.886–6.617; HR = 3.576, 95% CI 1.908–6.703, respectively] and that the Lauren classification of diffuse type was also an independent risk factor for OS compared with the intestinal type (HR = 3.843, 95% CI 1.443–10.237). Conclusions The Lauren classification and ypTNM stage after neoadjuvant chemotherapy are independent prognostic factors in advanced gastric cancer. A GHR ≥ 50%/< 50% can be used as the primary criterion for advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy to determine postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shen-Bao Hu
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Chun-Hao Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Xiang Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Yun-Wei Dong
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Lin Zhao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Hong-Feng Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Yue Cao
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Ding-Rong Zhong
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Yan-Long Li
- Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of basic Medicine, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100005, China
| | - Wei-Sheng Gao
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Chun-Mei Bai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Zhong-Hua Shang
- Department of General Surgery, Second Clinical Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, Shanxi, China
| | - Xiao-Yi Li
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Heger P, Blank S, Gooßen K, Nienhüser H, Diener MK, Ulrich A, Mihaljevic AL, Schmidt T. Thoracoabdominal versus transhiatal surgical approaches for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2019; 404:103-113. [PMID: 30607534 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-018-1745-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the oncological and perioperative outcomes of transhiatally extended gastrectomy (TEG) and thoracoabdominal esophagectomy (TAE) for therapy of adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) with focus on AEG type II, as the optimal approach for these tumors is still unclear. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) were searched until July 24, 2018. Studies comparing TAE and TEG for surgical treatment of AEG type tumors have been included. Patient's baseline and perioperative data have been extracted and meta-analyses have been conducted for the outcomes: number of dissected lymph nodes, R0-resection rate, anastomotic leak rate, postoperative morbidity, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS Of 6709 articles identified, 8 studies have been included for further analysis. One thousand thirty-four patients underwent TAE, and 1177 patients TEG. No differences were found between the approaches in regard to number of dissected lymph nodes (MD - 0.96; 95% CI - 3.07 to 1.15; p = 0.37), R0-resection rates (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.57 to 1.63; p = 0.90), anastomotic leak rates (OR 1.13; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.86; p = 0.63), and 30-day mortality (OR 1.53; 95% CI 0.90 to 2.61; p = 0.11). However, a higher rate of postoperative morbidity was found after TAE (OR 1.55; 95% CI 1.12 to 2.14; p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS The optimal approach to surgical therapy of AEG II still remains unclear. This study identified a significantly higher rate of postoperative morbidity after TAE at comparable surgical outcomes. Due to major limitations concerning the quality of included studies, current data strongly mandates a properly designed randomized controlled trial to identify the optimal surgical approach for AEG type II tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Heger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Susanne Blank
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Käthe Gooßen
- The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Henrik Nienhüser
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexis Ulrich
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Schmidt
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Sarigoz T, Sarici IS, Duzgun O, Kalayci MU. Laparoscopic Surgery for Gastric Cancer. NEW HORIZONS IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY 2018. [DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.72852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
|
54
|
Affiliation(s)
- Jon O Wee
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Zhao P, Yan W, Fu H, Lin Y, Chen KN. Efficacy of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis. Thorac Cancer 2018; 9:1048-1055. [PMID: 29927075 PMCID: PMC6068451 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2018] [Revised: 05/17/2018] [Accepted: 05/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the predominant type of esophageal cancer and most clinically curable patients are diagnosed with locally advanced disease. While the efficacy of preoperative treatment is relatively clear and well characterized, the effect of postoperative treatment, especially postoperative chemotherapy, remains controversial, and its role in the treatment strategy is obscure. We conducted an updated meta‐analysis to include recent developments. Methods A comprehensive search in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify studies published from the inception of each database to February 2018. The overall survival (OS) and disease‐free survival (DFS) rates of patients treated with and without postoperative chemotherapy were analyzed and compared. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the associations between postoperative chemotherapy and patient survival. Potential publication bias was assessed using Egger's line regression test. Results A total of nine studies, including three randomized controlled trials and six retrospective studies, were retrieved from the databases, comprising a total of 1684 cases. The results showed that postoperative chemotherapy could improve OS (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66–0.91; P = 0.002) and DFS (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.6–0.86; P < 0.001). Conclusions The current meta‐analysis supports postoperative chemotherapy as an independent favorable prognostic factor for ESCC, which could improve both OS and DFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peiliang Zhao
- The First Department of Thoracic Surgery, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Wanpu Yan
- The First Department of Thoracic Surgery, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Hao Fu
- The First Department of Thoracic Surgery, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Yao Lin
- The First Department of Thoracic Surgery, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Ke-Neng Chen
- The First Department of Thoracic Surgery, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Zanoni A, Verlato G, Baiocchi GL, Casella F, Cossu A, d'Ignazio A, De Pascale S, Giacopuzzi S. Siewert III esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: does TNM 8th save us? Updates Surg 2018; 70:241-249. [PMID: 29808375 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-018-0537-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2018] [Accepted: 05/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Siewert III cancers were classified as esophageal cancers by the TNM 7th edition (TNM7), while being defined as gastric cancers by the new TNM 8th edition (TNM8). Aim of this study was to compare previous and present TNM classifications of Siewert III. From 2000 to 2015, 309 patients with Siewert III adenocarcinoma were treated at ten high-volume centers, belonging to the GIRCG (Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer). We retrospectively analyzed overall survival according to TNM classifications: gastric TNM8 was compared with either gastric TNM7 or esophageal TNM7. Median number of lymph nodes harvested was 31 (interquartile range 22-44). Agreement between gastric TNM7 and TNM8 was very good (weighted kappa 92.3%, IC 95% 90.3-94.1%). Accordingly, stage migration was observed in 54 of 309 patients (17.5%), with 12 patients upstaged (3.9%) and 42 downstaged (13.6%). Cox models including either gastric TNM7 or TNM8 achieved similar goodness-of-fit and c-index. Differences were much larger, when shifting from esophageal TNM7 to gastric TNM8: the agreement was much lower (weighted kappa 69.1%, 65.2-73.2%), with 196 of 309 patients (63.4%) downstaging. The corresponding Cox model presented the lowest goodness-of-fit and discrimination ability. Gastric TNM7 and TNM8 were largely superimposable, so that stage migration was minor and prognostic significance was similar. At variance, stage migration was substantial when shifting from esophageal TNM7 to TNM8. Moreover, survival models with esophageal TNM7 presented the worst goodness-of-fit and the lowest discrimination ability. This further supports placing Siewert III among gastric cancers, as done in TNM8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Zanoni
- Unit of General Surgery, Rovereto Hospital (APSS of Trento), Corso Verona 4, Rovereto, TN, Italy.
- General and Upper G.I. Surgery Division, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
| | - Giuseppe Verlato
- Unit of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Gian Luca Baiocchi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Cossu
- Department of Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessia d'Ignazio
- Department of General Surgery and Oncology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Stefano De Pascale
- Division of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Simone Giacopuzzi
- General and Upper G.I. Surgery Division, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Nagel M, Schulz J, Maderer A, Goepfert K, Gehrke N, Thomaidis T, Thuss-Patience PC, Al-Batran SE, Hegewisch-Becker S, Grimminger P, Galle PR, Möhler M, Schattenberg JM. Cytokeratin-18 fragments predict treatment response and overall survival in gastric cancer in a randomized controlled trial. Tumour Biol 2018. [PMID: 29534639 DOI: 10.1177/1010428318764007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer is common malignancy and exhibits a poor prognosis. At the time of diagnosis, the majority of patients present with metastatic disease which precludes curative treatment. Non-invasive biomarkers which discriminate early from advanced stages or predict the response to treatment are urgently required. This study explored the cytokeratin-18 fragment M30 and full-length cytokeratin-18 M65 in predicting treatment response and survival in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of advanced gastric cancer. METHODS Patients enrolled in the SUN-CASE study received sunitinib or placebo as an adjunct to standard therapy with leucovorin (Ca-folinate), 5-fluorouracil, and irinotecan in second or third line. Treatment response rates, progression-free survival and overall survival were assessed during a follow-up period of 12 months. Cytokeratin-18 fragments were analyzed in 52 patients at baseline and day 14 of therapy. RESULTS Levels of M30 correlated with the presence of metastasis and lymph node involvement and decreased significantly during chemotherapy. Importantly, baseline levels of M30 were significantly higher in patients who failed therapy. In addition, patients who did not respond to treatment were also identifiable at day 14 based on elevated M30 levels. By stepwise regression analysis, M30 at day 14 was identified as independent predictor of treatment response. Likewise, serum levels of full-length cytokeratin-18 M65 at baseline also correlated with treatment failure and progression-free survival. The addition of sunitinib did not exert any effects on serum levels of M30 or M65. CONCLUSION The cytokeratin-18 fragment M30 at day 14 identifies patients that fail to second- or third-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer. Validation of this non-invasive biomarker in gastric cancer is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Nagel
- 1 Department of Medicine I, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Julia Schulz
- 1 Department of Medicine I, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Annett Maderer
- 1 Department of Medicine I, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Katrin Goepfert
- 1 Department of Medicine I, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Nadine Gehrke
- 1 Department of Medicine I, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Thomas Thomaidis
- 1 Department of Medicine I, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter C Thuss-Patience
- 2 Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charite-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Salah E Al-Batran
- 3 Institute of Clinical Cancer Research, Krankenhaus Nordwest, UCT University Cancer Center, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | - Peter Grimminger
- 5 General-, Visceral- and Transplant Surgery; University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter Robert Galle
- 1 Department of Medicine I, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus Möhler
- 1 Department of Medicine I, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jörn Markus Schattenberg
- 1 Department of Medicine I, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Effect of nutritional risk on short-term outcomes after laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy: a prospective study from two centers. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 30:136-142. [PMID: 29227327 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000001017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM The aim of this prospective double-center study was to explore the effect of nutritional risk on short-term outcomes in the patients who had gastric cancer and underwent a laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a study of patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy in two large centers between June 2014 and April 2017. Patients' demographic and clinical characteristics and postoperative short-term outcomes were prospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups depend on the preoperative presence of nutritional risk. Clinical variables were compared. Univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression analyses evaluating the risk factors for postoperative complications were performed. RESULTS A total of 256 patients, comprising 187 males and 69 females, met the inclusion criteria and were included in this study. The mean age was 61.81 years, the average BMI was 22.44 kg/m, and the average preoperative serum albumin was 39.42 g/l. Older age (P=0.001), higher tumor stage (P=0.047), lower BMI (P<0.001), lower preoperative serum albumin (P=0.005), and lower hemoglobin (P=0.013) were more common in the nutritional risk group. There were no significant differences in the short-term postoperative outcomes between nutritional risk and non-nutritional risk groups. Advanced age (P=0.024) and hypoalbuminemia (P=0.004) were independent risk factors for postoperative complications after laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy. CONCLUSION Nutritional risk may not be a clinical predictor of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy. Advanced age and preoperative hypoalbuminemia were independent risk factors for grade II or more postoperative complications.
Collapse
|
59
|
Wu SG, Zhang ZQ, Liu WM, He ZY, Li FY, Lin HX, Sun JY, Lin H, Li Q. Impact of the number of resected lymph nodes on survival after preoperative radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Oncotarget 2017; 7:22497-507. [PMID: 26992210 PMCID: PMC5008376 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.8113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2015] [Accepted: 02/24/2016] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
To assess the impact of the number of resected lymph nodes (RLNs) for survival in esophageal cancer (EC) patients treated with preoperative radiotherapy and cancer-directed surgery. The Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was queried to identify EC patients treated from 1988 to 2012 who had complete data on the number of positive lymph nodes and number of RLNs. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox regression proportional hazard methods were used to determine factors that significantly impact cause-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). There were a total of 3,159 patients who received preoperative radiotherapy and cancer-directed surgery. The median number of RLNs was 10 in both patients who received and did not receive preoperative radiotherapy (P = 0.332). Cox regression univariate and multivariate analysis showed that RLN count was a significant prognostic factor for CSS and OS. Patients with 11–71 RLNs had better CSS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.694, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.603–0.799, P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.724, 95% CI: 0.636–0.824, P < 0.001) than patients with 1–10 RLNs. The 5-year CSS rates were 39.1% and 44.8% in patients with 1–10 RLNs and 11–71 RLNs, respectively (P < 0.001). The 5-year OS rates were 33.7% and 39.9% in patients with 1–10 RLNs and 11–71 RLNs, respectively (P < 0.001). A higher number of RLNs was associated with better survival by tumor stage and nodal stage (all P < 0.05). RLN count is an independent prognostic factor in EC patients who undergo preoperative radiotherapy and cancer-directed surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- San-Gang Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen 361003, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhao-Qiang Zhang
- Eye Institute of Xiamen University, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Medical College of Xiamen University, Xiamen 361003, People's Republic of China
| | - Wen-Ming Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen 361003, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhen-Yu He
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Radiation Oncology, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Feng-Yan Li
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Radiation Oncology, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Huan-Xin Lin
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Radiation Oncology, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Jia-Yuan Sun
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Radiation Oncology, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Hui Lin
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning 530021, People's Republic of China
| | - Qun Li
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of Radiation Oncology, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Wang C, Li L, Duan Q, Wang Q, Chen J. Krüppel-like factor 2 suppresses human gastric tumorigenesis through inhibiting PTEN/AKT signaling. Oncotarget 2017; 8:100358-100370. [PMID: 29245984 PMCID: PMC5725026 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.22229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2017] [Accepted: 10/05/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Krüppel-like factors (KLFs) are a large family of DNA-binding transcriptional regulators that affect basic cellular processes such as growth, survival, migration and differentiation and serve a complicated function in cancers. KLF2, one member of the KLF family, is dysregulated in many tumors. However, the specific role of KLF2 in human gastric tumorigenesis is unknown. Here we show that the expression of KLF2 protein was lower in gastric tumors when compared with adjacent normal tissue. Moreover, downregulated KLF2 expression in primary gastric tumor was closely correlated with patients’ survival. Various cell experiments showed that ectopic KLF2 expression suppressed the proliferation, migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells. Moreover, KLF2 overexpression remarkably enhanced cell apoptosis and induced cell cycle arrest. Impaired expression of KLF2 markedly promoted cell growth in vitro and significantly expanded tumor size in vivo. Mechanically, the mRNA and protein level of PTEN was reduced in KLF2 deficient cells and xenograft tumors, suggesting that PTEN/AKT signaling was involved in the gastric tumor inhibitory effect of KLF2. Administration of AKT inhibitor AZD5363 or Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) in KLF2 knockdown or ectopic expression cell lines, respectively, substantially reversed the proliferation phenotype. Collectively, our findings provide clinical evidence and a potential mechanism supporting that KLF2 suppresses human gastric tumorigenesis through inhibiting the PTEN/AKT axis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunmei Wang
- East China Normal University and Shanghai Fengxian District Central Hospital Joint Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai 200241, China.,Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Fengxian Hospital of Southern Medical University, Shanghai 201499, China.,Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200120, China
| | - Liang Li
- East China Normal University and Shanghai Fengxian District Central Hospital Joint Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai 200241, China
| | - Qiuhui Duan
- East China Normal University and Shanghai Fengxian District Central Hospital Joint Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai 200241, China
| | - Qingqing Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Fengxian Hospital of Anhui University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 201499, China
| | - Jinlian Chen
- East China Normal University and Shanghai Fengxian District Central Hospital Joint Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai 200241, China.,Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Fengxian Hospital of Southern Medical University, Shanghai 201499, China
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Kulig J, Wallner G, Drews M, Frączek M, Jeziorski A, Kielan W, Kołodziejczyk P, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A, Starzyńska T, Zinkiewicz K, Wojtukiewicz M, Skoczylas WT, Richter P, Krawczyk M. Polish Consensus on Treatment of Gastric Cancer; update 2017. POLISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY 2017; 89:59-73. [PMID: 29154240 DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.5413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
The "Polish Research on Gastric Cancer" project has been continued since 1986. The main aim of this project, which is a multicenter and interdisciplinary research, is enhancing the treatment results of gastric cancer patients by developing and promoting the use of optimal methods for diagnosis and treatment, both surgical as well as combined. One of the more important achievements of the project is the development and publication of a document named "Polish Consensus on Treatment of Patients with Gastric Cancer", whose first version was published in 1998. Following versions were updated adequately to changing trends in the proceedings in patients with gastric cancer. A scientific symposium on "Polish Consensus on Treatment of Gastric Cancer - update 2016" was held in 3-4 June 2016 in Cracow. During the symposium a panel session was held during which all authors publicly presented the Consensus assumptions to be discussed further. Moreover, the already mentioned session was preceded by a correspondence as well as a working meeting in order to consolidate the position. It has to be underlined that the directions and guidelines included in the Consensus are not the arbitrarily assumed rules of conduct in a legal aspect and as such every doctor/team of doctors is entitled to make different decisions as long as they are beneficial to a patient with gastric cancer. The Consensus discusses as follows: a) recommended qualifications (stage of advancement, pathological, lymph node topography and the extent of lymphadenectomy, division of cancer of the gastroesophageal junction), b) rules for diagnostics including recommendations regarding endoscopic examination and clinical evaluation of the advancement stage, c) recommendations regarding surgical treatment (extent of resection, extent of lymphadenectomy, tactics of proceedings in cancer of the gastroesophageal junction), d) recommendations regarding combined treatment with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, e) place of endoscopic and less invasive surgery in the treatment of gastric cancer. This publication is a summary of the arrangements made in the panel session during the abovementioned scientific symposium in Cracow in 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Kulig
- 1st Department of General Surgery and Clinic of General Surgery, Oncological Surgery and Gastroenterological Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College in Cracow, Poland
| | - Grzegorz Wallner
- 2nd Department and Clinic of General, Gastroenterological and Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery, Medical University in Lublin, Poland
| | - Michał Drews
- Department and Clinic of General Surgery, Gastroenterological Surgery and Plastic Surgery, Medical University in Poznan, Poland
| | - Mariusz Frączek
- Department and Clinic of General, Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Warsaw Medical University, Poland
| | | | - Wojciech Kielan
- 2nd Department and Clinic of General Surgery and Oncological Surgery, Medical University in Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Kołodziejczyk
- 1st Department of General Surgery and Clinic of General Surgery, Oncological Surgery and Gastroenterological Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College in Cracow, Poland
| | | | - Teresa Starzyńska
- Department and Clinic of Gastroenterology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Zinkiewicz
- 2nd Department and Clinic of General, Gastroenterological and Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery, Medical University in Lublin, Poland
| | | | - W Tomasz Skoczylas
- 2nd Department and Clinic of General, Gastroenterological and Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery, Medical University in Lublin, Poland
| | - Piotr Richter
- 1st Department of General Surgery and Clinic of General Surgery, Oncological Surgery and Gastroenterological Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College in Cracow, Poland
| | - Marek Krawczyk
- Department and Clinic of General, Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Warsaw Medical University, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
ten Kate FJC, van Olphen SH, Bruno MJ, Wijnhoven BPL, van Lanschot JJB, Looijenga LHJ, Fitzgerald RC, Biermann K. Loss of SRY-box2 (SOX2) expression and its impact on survival of patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 2017; 104:1327-1337. [PMID: 28692180 PMCID: PMC5600089 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2016] [Revised: 12/27/2016] [Accepted: 03/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) is a highly aggressive malignancy with poor survival, which is highly variable amongst patients with comparable conventional prognosticators. Therefore molecular biomarkers are urgently needed to improve the prediction of survival in these patients. SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 2, also known as SOX2, is a transcription factor involved in embryonal development of the gastrointestinal tract as well as in carcinogenesis. The purpose of this study was to see whether SOX2 expression is associated with survival in patients with OAC. METHODS SOX2 was studied by immunohistochemistry in patients who had undergone potentially curative oesophagectomy for adenocarcinoma. Protein expression of SOX2 was evaluated using tissue microarrays from resection specimens, and results were analysed in relation to the clinical data by Cox regression analysis. SOX2 was evaluated in two independent OAC cohorts (Rotterdam cohort and a multicentre UK cohort). RESULTS Loss of SOX2 expression was independently predictive of adverse overall survival in the multivariable analysis, adjusted for known factors influencing survival, in both cohorts (Rotterdam cohort: hazard ratio (HR) 1·42, 95 per cent c.i. 1·07 to 1·89, P = 0·016; UK cohort: HR 1·54, 1·08 to 2·19, P = 0·017). When combined with clinicopathological staging, loss of SOX2 showed an increased effect in patients with pT1-2 tumours (P = 0·010) and node-negative OAC (P = 0·038), with an incrementally adverse effect on overall survival for stage I OAC with SOX2 loss (HR 3·18, 1·18 to 8·56; P = 0·022). CONCLUSION SOX2 is an independent prognostic factor for long-term survival in OAC, especially in patients with stage I OAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F. J. C. ten Kate
- Department of PathologyErasmus Medical CentreRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - S. H. van Olphen
- Department of PathologyErasmus Medical CentreRotterdamThe Netherlands
- Departments of Gastroenterology and HepatologyErasmus Medical CentreRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - M. J. Bruno
- Departments of Gastroenterology and HepatologyErasmus Medical CentreRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - R. C. Fitzgerald
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Cancer Cell Unit, Hutchison/MRC Research CentreCambridgeUK
| | - K. Biermann
- Department of PathologyErasmus Medical CentreRotterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Predina JD, Newton AD, Keating J, Barbosa EM, Okusanya O, Xia L, Dunbar A, Connolly C, Baldassari MP, Mizelle J, Delikatny EJ, Kucharczuk JC, Deshpande C, Kularatne SA, Low P, Drebin J, Singhal S. Intraoperative Molecular Imaging Combined With Positron Emission Tomography Improves Surgical Management of Peripheral Malignant Pulmonary Nodules. Ann Surg 2017; 266:479-488. [PMID: 28746152 PMCID: PMC11073793 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine if intraoperative molecular imaging (IMI) can improve detection of malignant pulmonary nodules. BACKGROUND 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) is commonly utilized in preoperative assessment of patients with solid malignancies; however, false negatives and false positives remain major limitations. Using patients with pulmonary nodules as a study model, we hypothesized that IMI with a folate receptor targeted near-infrared contrast agent (OTL38) can improve malignant pulmonary nodule identification when combined with PET. METHODS Fifty patients with pulmonary nodules with imaging features suspicious for malignancy underwent preoperative PET. Patients then received OTL38 before pulmonary resection. During resection, IMI was utilized to evaluate known pulmonary nodules and identify synchronous lesions. Tumor size, PET standardized uptake value, and IMI tumor-to-background ratios were compared for known and synchronous nodules via paired and unpaired t tests, when appropriate. Test characteristics of PET and IMI with OTL38 were compared. RESULTS IMI identified 56 of 59 (94.9%) malignant pulmonary nodules identified by preoperative imaging. IMI located an additional 9 malignant lesions not identified preoperatively. Nodules only detected by IMI were smaller than nodules detected preoperatively (0.5 vs 2.4 cm; P < 0.01), but displayed similar fluorescence (tumor-to-background ratio 3.3 and 3.1; P = 0.50). Sensitivity of IMI and PET were 95.6% and 73.5% (P = 0.001), respectively; and positive predictive values were 94.2% and 89.3%, respectively (P > 0.05). Additionally, utilization of IMI clinically upstaged 6 (12%) subjects and improved management of 15 (30%) subjects. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that combining IMI with PET may provide superior oncologic outcomes for patients with resectable lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jarrod D. Predina
- Center for Precision Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School
| | - Andrew D. Newton
- Center for Precision Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
| | - Jane Keating
- Center for Precision Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
| | - Eduardo M. Barbosa
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
| | - Olugbenga Okusanya
- Center for Precision Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
| | - Leilei Xia
- Center for Precision Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
| | - Ashley Dunbar
- Center for Precision Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
| | - Courtney Connolly
- Center for Precision Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
| | - Michael P. Baldassari
- Center for Precision Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
| | - Jack Mizelle
- Center for Precision Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
| | - Edward J. Delikatny
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
| | - John C. Kucharczuk
- Center for Precision Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
| | - Charuhas Deshpande
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
| | - Sumith A Kularatne
- Department of Chemistry, and Purdue Institute for Drug Discovery, Purdue University
- On Target Laboratories, West Lafayette, Indiana
| | - Phillip Low
- Department of Chemistry, and Purdue Institute for Drug Discovery, Purdue University
- On Target Laboratories, West Lafayette, Indiana
| | - Jeffrey Drebin
- Center for Precision Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
| | - Sunil Singhal
- Center for Precision Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Heger P, Blank S, Diener MK, Ulrich A, Schmidt T, Büchler MW, Mihaljevic AL. Gastric Preconditioning in Advance of Esophageal Resection-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2017; 21:1523-1532. [PMID: 28439770 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-017-3416-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2016] [Accepted: 03/27/2017] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomotic leakage is one of the most severe complications following esophageal resection. Among other strategies, gastric ischemic preconditioning has been proposed to improve anastomotic integrity. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate whether gastric preconditioning has influence on peri- or postoperative outcomes after esophageal resection. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies comparing gastric preconditioning with non-preconditioned patients for any indication of esophageal resection. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted for main outcomes. RESULTS Gastric preconditioning did not reduce anastomotic leakages (OR 0.76; 95%-CI 0.51 to 1.13; p = 0.18), anastomotic strictures (OR 1.10; 95%-CI 0.58 to 2.10; p = 0.76;), major complications (OR 1.14; 95%-CI 0.60 to 2.14; p = 0.69), or in-hospital mortality (OR 0.62; 95%-CI 0.28 to 1.40; p = 0.25). However, preconditioning reduced the rate of severe leaks requiring reoperation (OR 0.20; 95%-CI 0.08 to 0.53; p = 0.001). Increasing the period between preconditioning and esophageal resection over 2 weeks did not reduce anastomotic leakage compared to shorter waiting times (OR 0.65; 95%-CI 0.38 to 1.13; p = 0.13). CONCLUSION With current evidence, gastric preconditioning does not seem to reduce overall rates of anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection but seems to reduce severity of leakages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Heger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Susanne Blank
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexis Ulrich
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Schmidt
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Wang G, Sun J, Liu G, Fu Y, Zhang X. Bradykinin Promotes Cell Proliferation, Migration, Invasion, and Tumor Growth of Gastric Cancer Through ERK Signaling Pathway. J Cell Biochem 2017; 118:4444-4453. [PMID: 28464378 DOI: 10.1002/jcb.26100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2017] [Accepted: 04/28/2017] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Bradykinin (BK) has been reported to be involved in the progression of diverse types of cancer. In the present study, we investigated the possible role of BK in cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and tumor growth of gastric cancer (GC). Cell proliferation was evaluated by MTT assays. Cell migration and invasion were assessed by Transwell assays. Tumor growth of nude mice was detected by establishing subcutaneous xenograft tumor model. Silencing of bradykinin B1 receptor (B1R) and the bradykinin B2 receptor (B2R) was performed by transfecting cells with si-B1R and si-B2R, respectively. The protein expression levels of phospho-ERK1/2 (p-ERK1/2), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2, MMP-9, and E-Cadherin were examined by Western blot. Data revealed that BK promoted cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and the in vivo tumor growth of GC cells SGC-7901 and HGC-27. Furthermore, BK elevated the protein levels of p-ERK1/2, MMP-2, and MMP-9, but reduced E-Cadherin. In addition, by repressing B2R using si-B2R or inhibiting ERK signaling pathway using PD98059, BK-mediated promotion of cell proliferation, migration, and invasion and upregulation of p-ERK1/2, MMP-2/9, as well as downregulation of E-Cadherin were attenuated. Taken together, the present study demonstrated that BK promoted cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and tumor growth by binding to B2R via ERK signaling pathway. Our findings may provide promising options for the further treatment of GC. J. Cell. Biochem. 118: 4444-4453, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guojun Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450000, China
| | - Junfeng Sun
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450000, China
| | - Guanghui Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450000, China
| | - Yang Fu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450000, China
| | - Xiefu Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450000, China
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Favi F, Bollschweiler E, Berlth F, Plum P, Hescheler DA, Alakus H, Semrau R, Celik E, Mönig SP, Drebber U, Hölscher AH. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation for patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus? A propensity score-matched study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017; 43:1572-1580. [PMID: 28666624 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2017] [Revised: 04/10/2017] [Accepted: 06/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multimodal therapies are the standard of care for advanced adenocarcinomas of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction (AEG Types I and II). Only three randomised trials have compared preoperative chemotherapy with and without radiation. The results showed a small benefit for combined chemoradiation. In the meantime, newer therapy protocols are available. AIM In a propensity-score matched study, we analysed patients with locally advanced AEG type I or II, treated with chemotherapy (FLOT-protocol) or chemoradiation (CROSS-protocol), followed by oesophagectomy, in a single high-volume centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 2011 and 2015, 137 patients with advanced (cT3NxcM0) adenocarcinoma received pre-operative therapy; 70% had chemoradiation (CROSS-protocol) and 30% had chemotherapy (FLOT-protocol). After propensity-score matching, 40 patients from the CROSS-group were selected for analysis. Postoperative histopathological response and prognosis were analysed. RESULTS The two groups were comparable according to the matching criteria age, gender, tumour location, and year of surgery. R0-resection was achieved in 97% of patients in the CROSS-group and 85% of the FLOT-group (p = 0.049). Major response of the primary tumour was evident more often in the CROSS-group (17/40 pts. 43%) versus FLOT-group (11/40 pts. 27%) as well no lymph node metastasis (ypN0 = 68% versus ypN0 = 40%) (p = 0.014). Prognosis were not significantly different between the two groups. In multivariate analysis, only ypN-category was an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSION Compared to FLOT-chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with the CROSS-protocol in locally advanced adenocarcinoma AEG types I and II resulted in better response by the primary tumour and less lymph node metastasis but without superior survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Favi
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - E Bollschweiler
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - F Berlth
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - P Plum
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - D A Hescheler
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - H Alakus
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - R Semrau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - E Celik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - S P Mönig
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Service de Chirurgie Viscéral, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Switzerland
| | - U Drebber
- Institute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - A H Hölscher
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Surgery, AGAPLESION Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Ji X, Yan Y, Bu ZD, Li ZY, Wu AW, Zhang LH, Wu XJ, Zong XL, Li SX, Shan F, Jia ZY, Ji JF. The optimal extent of gastrectomy for middle-third gastric cancer: distal subtotal gastrectomy is superior to total gastrectomy in short-term effect without sacrificing long-term survival. BMC Cancer 2017; 17:345. [PMID: 28526077 PMCID: PMC5437661 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3343-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2017] [Accepted: 05/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal extent of gastrectomy for middle-third gastric cancer remains controversial. In our study, the short-term effects and longer-term survival outcomes of distal subtotal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy are analysed to determine the optimal extent of gastrectomy for middle-third gastric cancer. METHODS We retrospectively collect and analyse clinicopathologic data and follow-up outcomes from a prospectively collected database at the Peking University Cancer Hospital. Patients with middle-third gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent curative resection are enrolled in our study. RESULTS We collect data of 339 patients between January 2005 and October 2011. A total of 144 patients underwent distal subtotal gastrectomy, and 195 patients underwent total gastrectomy. Patients in the total gastrectomy group have longer operative duration (P < 0.001) and postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.001) than those in the distal subtotal gastrectomy group. In the total gastrectomy group, more lymph nodes are harvested (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, the rate of postoperative complications is lower in the distal subtotal gastrectomy group than in the total gastrectomy group (8% vs 15%, P = 0.047). Further analysis demonstrates that the rate of anastomosis leakage is lower in the distal subtotal gastrectomy group than in the total gastrectomy group (0% vs 4%, P = 0.023). Kaplan-Meier (log rank test) analysis shows a significant difference in overall survival between the two groups. The 5-year overall survival rates in the distal subtotal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy groups are 65% and 47%, respectively (P < 0.001). Further stage-stratified analysis reveals that no statistical significance exists in 5-year survival rate between the distal subtotal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy groups at the same stage. Multivariate analysis shows that age (P = 0.046), operation duration (P < 0.001), complications (P = 0.037), usage of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.001), tumor size (P = 0.012), presence of lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.043) and N stage (P < 0.001) are independent prognostic factors for survival. CONCLUSIONS For patients with middle-third gastric cancer, distal subtotal gastrectomy shortens the operation duration and postoperative hospital stay and reduces postoperative complications. Meanwhile, the long-term survival of patients with distal subtotal gastrectomy is similar to that of those with total gastrectomy at the same stage. The extent of gastrectomy for middle-third gastric cancer is not an independent prognostic factor for survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Ji
- Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| | - Yan Yan
- Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Endoscopy, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Zhao-De Bu
- Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| | - Zi-Yu Li
- Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| | - Ai-Wen Wu
- Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| | - Lian-Hai Zhang
- Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| | - Xiao-Jiang Wu
- Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| | - Xiang-Long Zong
- Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| | - Shuang-Xi Li
- Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| | - Fei Shan
- Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| | - Zi-Yu Jia
- Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| | - Jia-Fu Ji
- Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142 China
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Di Leo A, Zanoni A. Siewert III adenocarcinoma: treatment update. Updates Surg 2017; 69:319-325. [PMID: 28303519 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-017-0429-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2016] [Accepted: 03/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Siewert III cancer, although representing around 40% of EGJ cancers and being the EGJ cancer with worst prognosis, does not have a homogenous treatment, has few dedicated studies, and is often not considered in study protocols. Although staged as an esophageal cancer by the TNM 7th ed., it is considered a gastric cancer by new TNM 8th ed. Our aim was to consolidate the current literature on the indications and treatment options for Siewert III adenocarcinoma. A review of the literature was performed to better delineate treatment indications (according to stage, surgical margins, type of lymphatic spread and lymphadenectomy) and treatment strategy. The treatment approach is strictly dependent on cancer site and nodal diffusion. T1m cancers have insignificant risk of nodal metastases and can be safely treated with endoscopic resections. The risk of nodal metastases increases markedly starting from T1sm cancers and requires surgery with lymphadenectomy. The site of this type of cancer and the nodal diffusion require a total gastrectomy and distal esophagectomy, with 5 cm of clear proximal and distal margins and a D2 abdominal and inferior mediastinal lymphadenectomy. Multimodal treatments are indicated in all locally advanced and node positive cancers. Siewert III cancers are gastric cancers with some peculiarities and require dedicated studies and deserve more consideration in the current literature, especially because their treatment is particularly challenging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Di Leo
- Unit of General Surgery, Rovereto Hospital, APSS of Trento, Corso Verona 4, 38068, Rovereto, TN, Italy.
| | - Andrea Zanoni
- Unit of General Surgery, Rovereto Hospital, APSS of Trento, Corso Verona 4, 38068, Rovereto, TN, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Machairas N, Charalampoudis P, Molmenti EP, Kykalos S, Tsaparas P, Stamopoulos P, Sotiropoulos GC. The value of staging laparoscopy in gastric cancer. Ann Gastroenterol 2017; 30:287-294. [PMID: 28469358 PMCID: PMC5411378 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2017.0133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2016] [Accepted: 02/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment options for patients with gastric cancer (GC) are based on tumor staging and resectability. Although only surgery provides improved survival, resection is contraindicated and should be avoided in the presence of intra-abdominal disease stage M1 (liver, peritoneal, or non-local lymph node metastases). Thus, a detailed and precise evaluation is imperative for optimal treatment. Staging laparoscopy (SL) constitutes a major tool in the accurate diagnosis of several types of cancers, including GC. SL presents several critical advantages: it can diagnose intra-abdominal disease; serve as a complement to other imaging studies; allow for biopsies; facilitate intraoperative ultrasound evaluations; allow for sampling of peritoneal fluid for cytological examination; and serve as an option for the administration of intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Although considered and advocated as a very useful asset in the pre-treatment cancer-staging arsenal, the wider application of SL has been long debated. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the contribution of laparoscopy to GC staging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Machairas
- 2 Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece (Nikolaos Machairas, Petros Charalampoudis, Stylianos Kykalos, Peter Tsaparas, Paraskevas Stamopoulos, Georgios C. Sotiropoulos)
| | - Petros Charalampoudis
- 2 Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece (Nikolaos Machairas, Petros Charalampoudis, Stylianos Kykalos, Peter Tsaparas, Paraskevas Stamopoulos, Georgios C. Sotiropoulos)
| | - Ernesto P Molmenti
- Department of Surgery, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, New York, USA (Ernesto P. Molmenti)
| | - Stylianos Kykalos
- 2 Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece (Nikolaos Machairas, Petros Charalampoudis, Stylianos Kykalos, Peter Tsaparas, Paraskevas Stamopoulos, Georgios C. Sotiropoulos)
| | - Peter Tsaparas
- 2 Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece (Nikolaos Machairas, Petros Charalampoudis, Stylianos Kykalos, Peter Tsaparas, Paraskevas Stamopoulos, Georgios C. Sotiropoulos)
| | - Paraskevas Stamopoulos
- 2 Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece (Nikolaos Machairas, Petros Charalampoudis, Stylianos Kykalos, Peter Tsaparas, Paraskevas Stamopoulos, Georgios C. Sotiropoulos)
| | - Georgios C Sotiropoulos
- 2 Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece (Nikolaos Machairas, Petros Charalampoudis, Stylianos Kykalos, Peter Tsaparas, Paraskevas Stamopoulos, Georgios C. Sotiropoulos)
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Wang JL, Ling ZQ. Progress in research of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2017; 25:358-363. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v25.i4.358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric signet ring cell carcinoma is a special type of gastric cancer. In recent years the incidence of gastric cancer has decreased, but the incidence of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma is still rising. Although a large number of studies reported the clinicopathologic features and oncogenesis of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma, the results are inconsistent. This article mainly discusses the clinicopathologic features, prognosis, and molecular characteristics of oncogenesis of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma to provide a basis and strategy for individualized treatment of this malignancy.
Collapse
|
71
|
Abstract
Gastric cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Many patients have inoperable disease at diagnosis or have recurrent disease after resection with curative intent. Gastric cancer is separated anatomically into true gastric adenocarcinomas and gastro-oesophageal-junction adenocarcinomas, and histologically into diffuse and intestinal types. Gastric cancer should be treated by teams of experts from different disciplines. Surgery is the only curative treatment. For locally advanced disease, adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy is usually implemented in combination with surgery. In metastatic disease, outcomes are poor, with median survival being around 1 year. Targeted therapies, such as trastuzumab, an antibody against HER2 (also known as ERBB2), and the VEGFR-2 antibody ramucirumab, have been introduced. In this Seminar, we present an update of the causes, classification, diagnosis, and treatment of gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Van Cutsem
- Department of Gastroenterology/Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Xavier Sagaert
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Baki Topal
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hans Prenen
- Department of Gastroenterology/Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Van Laethem JL, Carneiro F, Ducreux M, Messman H, Lordick F, Ilson DH, Allum WH, Haustermans K, Lepage C, Matysiak-Budnik T, Cats A, Schmiegel W, Cervantes A, Van Cutsem E, Rougier P, Seufferlein T. The multidisciplinary management of gastro-oesophageal junction tumours: European Society of Digestive Oncology (ESDO): Expert discussion and report from the 16th ESMO World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer, Barcelona. Dig Liver Dis 2016; 48:1283-1289. [PMID: 27590840 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2016.08.112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2016] [Revised: 08/03/2016] [Accepted: 08/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND SCOPE The management of GOJ cancers remains controversial and may vary between countries. Evidence-based attitudes and guidelines are not easy to elaborate since most of the trials and studies reported mixed cases of oesophageal (both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell tumours), GOJ and gastric cancers. The aim of this expert discussion and position paper is to elaborate practical recommendations that integrate evidence-reported literature and experience-based attitude covering all clinical aspects of GOJ cancer across different specialities and countries in Europe. METHODOLOGY Opinion leaders, selected on scientific merit were asked to answer to a prepared set of questions covering the approach of GOJ tumours from definition to therapeutic strategies. All answers were then discussed during a plenary session and reported here in providing a well-balanced reflection of both clinical expertise and updated evidence-based medicine. RESULTS Definition, classification, diagnosis and staging of GOJ tumours were updated and debated. Therapeutic aspects including endoscopic therapy, surgical management, both multimodal curative and palliative management were also reviewed for proposing practical and consensual positions and recommendations whenever possible. CONCLUSION GOJ tumours deserve specific attention,not only for uniformising clinical management across countries but also for performing specific clinical and translational research,mainly in the curative perioperative setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J-L Van Laethem
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal cancer unit, Erasme University Hospital, ULB, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - F Carneiro
- Department of Pathology, Centro Hospitalar São João/Medical Faculty & Ipatimup/Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - M Ducreux
- Department of Digestive Oncology, Institut G Roussy, Paris, France
| | - H Messman
- III. Medical Department, Clinic Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - F Lordick
- University Cancer Center Leipzig (UCCL), University Medicine Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - D H Ilson
- Gastrointestinal cancer Division, Sloan memorial Kettering Hospital, New York, USA
| | - W H Allum
- Department of Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - K Haustermans
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - C Lepage
- Department of Hepato Gastroenterology and Digestive oncology, University hospital, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, LNC INSERM UMR866, Dijon, France
| | - T Matysiak-Budnik
- IMAD, Hepato-Gastroenterology & Digestive Oncology, CHU de Nantes, France
| | - A Cats
- Department of Gastroenterology, Netherland Kanker Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - W Schmiegel
- Department of Gastroenterology,University Hospital, Bochum,Germany
| | - A Cervantes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - E Van Cutsem
- Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ph Rougier
- University Paris V René Descartes and University Hospital Hotel Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Th Seufferlein
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Messager M, de Steur W, Boelens P, Jensen L, Mariette C, Reynolds J, Osorio J, Pera M, Johansson J, Kołodziejczyk P, Roviello F, De Manzoni G, Mönig S, Allum W. Description and analysis of clinical pathways for oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma, in 10 European countries (the EURECCA upper gastro intestinal group – European Registration of Cancer Care). Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 42:1432-47. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2015] [Accepted: 01/02/2016] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
|
74
|
Phase II study of neoadjuvant therapy with nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin followed by surgery in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget 2016; 7:50624-50634. [PMID: 27244882 PMCID: PMC5226608 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2016] [Accepted: 04/26/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background We carried out a phase II study to evaluate the efficiency and safety of the combination of nanoparticle albumin bound-paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) and cisplatin as preoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) Results From Oct 2011 to Dec 2012, 35 patients were enrolled and received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Thirty patients underwent surgery and achieved a 100% R0 resection. Pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 13.3% and near pCR rate was 6.7%. Down-staging was achieved in 19 patients. With median follow-up of 37.8 months, 16 patients were still alive. One-, 2- and 3- year overall survival (OS) rate was 90.0%, 70.0% and 43.3%, respectively. This treatment resulted in a median disease-free survival (DFS) of 34.7 months and a median OS of 37.8 months. Median DFS and OS of down-staged patients were significantly longer than those of non-downstaged patients. The grade 4 toxicities during neoadjuvant chemotherapy were limited to neutropenia (2.9%) and vomiting (2.9%). Methods Patients with locally advanced ESCC (stage IIA to IIIC) and performance status 0-1 were enrolled and received two cycles of nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m2) on day 1, 8, 22 and 29, and cisplatin (75 mg/m2) on day 1 and 22, followed by resection. Two cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with the same regimen were given. Postoperative radiotherapy was permitted and decided by radiation therapist. Conclusion Weekly nab-paclitaxel with three-weekly cisplatin seems effective and safe as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy strategy for locally advanced ESCC. Down-staged patients have favorable outcome. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01258192
Collapse
|
75
|
Wang X, Zhao L, Liu H, Zhong D, Liu W, Shan G, Dong F, Gao W, Bai C, Li X. A phase II study of a modified FOLFOX6 regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 2016; 114:1326-33. [PMID: 27172250 PMCID: PMC4984457 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2015] [Revised: 03/11/2016] [Accepted: 04/18/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) regimen as
a neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients. Methods: Seventy-three patients with T2–T4 or N+ were enroled. Preoperative
chemotherapy consisted of three cycles of mFOLFOX6. The primary end points were
the response rate and the R0 resection rate. Prognostic factors for overall
survival (OS) were investigated using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Sixty-seven (91.8%) patients completed 3 cycles, with grade 3–4
toxicity arising in 33.0%. The radiology response rate was 45.8%.
Sixty-seven (91.8%) patients receiving radical surgery showed different
levels of histological regression of the primary tumour, with a ⩾50%
regression rate of 49.2%. ypTNM stage (HR 4.045, 95% CI
1.429–11.446) and tumours of diffuse and mixed type (HR 9.963, 95% CI
1.937–51.235; HR 8.890, 95% CI 1.157–68.323, respectively) were
significantly associated with OS. The pathologic regression rate (GHR;
⩾2/3/<2/3, ⩾50%/<50%) was
statistically significantly associated with OS according to a univariate
analysis. Conclusions: Perioperative mFOLFOX6 was a tolerable and effective regimen for gastric cancer.
The ypTNM stage was an independent predictor of survival. GHR
⩾50%/<50% could be used as a surrogate marker for
selecting a postoperative chemotherapy regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiang Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100032, China
| | - Lin Zhao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100032, China
| | - Hongfeng Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Dingrong Zhong
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Guangliang Shan
- Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of basic Medicine, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China
| | - Fen Dong
- Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of basic Medicine, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China
| | - Weisheng Gao
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Chunmei Bai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100032, China
| | - Xiaoyi Li
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Yuan LW, Yamashita H, Seto Y. Glucose metabolism in gastric cancer: The cutting-edge. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:2046-2059. [PMID: 26877609 PMCID: PMC4726677 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i6.2046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2015] [Revised: 09/18/2015] [Accepted: 12/01/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Glucose metabolism in gastric cancer cells differs from that of normal epithelial cells. Upregulated aerobic glycolysis (Warburg effect) in gastric cancer meeting the demands of cell proliferation is associated with genetic mutations, epigenetic modification and proteomic alteration. Understanding the mechanisms of aerobic glycolysis may contribute to our knowledge of gastric carcinogenesis. Metabolomic studies offer novel, convenient and practical tools in the search for new biomarkers for early detection, diagnosis, prognosis, and chemosensitivity prediction of gastric cancer. Interfering with the process of glycolysis in cancer cells may provide a new and promising therapeutic strategy for gastric cancer. In this article, we present a brief review of recent studies of glucose metabolism in gastric cancer, with primary focus on the clinical applications of new biomarkers and their potential therapeutic role in gastric cancer.
Collapse
|
77
|
Badakhshi H, Kaul D, Zhao KLE. Association between the inflammatory biomarker, C-reactive protein, and the response to radiochemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer. Mol Clin Oncol 2016; 4:643-647. [PMID: 27073683 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2016.753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2015] [Accepted: 01/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Locally advanced esophageal cancer has been treated by a multimodality regimen encompassing combined radiochemotherapy (RCT). The tumor response to neoadjuvant RCT is a major determinant of further therapeutic strategies, whether surgery or a continuation of RCT, and therefore, also of the patient's overall prognosis. The present study included patients with histologically proven squamous cell esophageal carcinoma. The C-reactive protein (CRP) level was measured prior to and following the completion of neoadjuvant RCT. Only CRP measurements taken within 2 weeks of the start of RCT were analyzed. Further measurements were then taken at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 40 weeks following RCT. CRP levels were high prior to treatment; however, eventually decreased and normalized following the therapy. In univariate analysis, pre-therapeutic CRP levels had a significant influence on the response rate (P=0.033), whilst post-therapeutic CRP levels had no significant influence (P=0.383). Pre-therapeutic CRP levels, however, not post-therapeutic CRP levels were significantly correlated with the response rate (P=0.045 and P=0.444, respectively), and no association was observed between CRP levels and survival. This preliminary data indicated that the pre-therapeutic serum CRP level is a possible indicator of treatment response to RCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harun Badakhshi
- Department of Clinical Radiation Oncology, Ernst von Bergmann Medical Center, D-14467 Potsdam, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Clinical Radiation Oncology, Ernst von Bergmann Medical Center, D-14467 Potsdam, Germany
| | - Kuai-LE Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200240, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
78
|
Son T, Hyung WJ. Laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery: Current evidence and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:727-735. [PMID: 26811620 PMCID: PMC4716072 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2015] [Revised: 08/16/2015] [Accepted: 11/19/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic gastrectomy has been widely accepted as a standard alternative for the treatment of early-stage gastric adenocarcinoma because of its favorable short-term outcomes. Although controversies exist, such as establishing clear indications, proper preoperative staging, and oncologic safety, experienced surgeons and institutions have applied this approach, along with various types of function-preserving surgery, for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. With technical advancement and the advent of state-of-the-art instruments, indications for laparoscopic gastrectomy are expected to expand as far as locally advanced gastric cancer. Laparoscopic gastrectomy appears to be promising; however, scientific evidence necessary to generalize this approach to a standard treatment for all relevant patients and care providers remains to be gathered. Several multicenter, prospective randomized trials in high-incidence countries are ongoing, and results from these trials will highlight the short- and long-term outcomes of the approach. In this review, we describe up-to-date findings and critical issues regarding laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
Collapse
|
79
|
Patterns of Regional Lymph Node Recurrence After Radical Surgery for Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 101:551-7. [PMID: 26530541 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.08.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2015] [Revised: 08/03/2015] [Accepted: 08/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to investigate the patterns of regional lymph node recurrence after radical surgery for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS We retrospectively reviewed clinical characteristics of ESCC patients admitted to two institutions from 1990 to 2011, and analyzed the patterns of regional lymph node recurrence. RESULTS The records of 315 eligible patients with ESCC were reviewed. Of the 378 regional lymph node recurrence sites, 177 (46.8%) were in the supraclavicular areas, 120 (31.7%) in the mediastinum, and 81 (21.4%) in the upper abdominal areas. The most common sites of recurrence were the supraclavicular and mediastinum areas in patients with upper and middle thoracic ESCC. Approximately equal percentages of patients with lower thoracic tumors had supraclavicular, mediastinal, and upper abdominal (celiac) lymph node recurrence. Patients with tumor located in the lower thoracic esophagus had a lower probability of supraclavicular lymph node recurrence (p = 0.013). None of the assessed factors was associated with mediastinal lymph node recurrence. Celiac lymph node recurrence was more frequent among patients with lower thoracic ESCC (p = 0.004) and advanced pathologic nodal (pN) stage (pN2, p = 0.034; pN3, p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS After radical surgery for thoracic ESCC, the patterns of regional lymph node recurrence are related to the tumor location and pN stage.
Collapse
|
80
|
Pernot S, Voron T, Perkins G, Lagorce-Pages C, Berger A, Taieb J. Signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach: Impact on prognosis and specific therapeutic challenge. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:11428-11438. [PMID: 26523107 PMCID: PMC4616218 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i40.11428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 217] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2015] [Revised: 08/14/2015] [Accepted: 09/30/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
While the incidence of gastric cancer has decreased worldwide in recent decades, the incidence of signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) is rising. SRCC has a specific epidemiology and oncogenesis and has two forms: early gastric cancer, which can be resected endoscopically in some cases and which has a better outcome than non-SRCC, and advanced gastric cancer, which is generally thought to have a worse prognosis and lower chemosensitivity than non-SRCC. However, the prognosis of SRCC and its chemosensitivity with specific regimens are still controversial as SRCC is not specifically identified in most studies and its poor prognosis may be due to its more advanced stage. It therefore remains unclear if a specific therapeutic strategy is justified, as the benefit of perioperative chemotherapy and the value of taxane-based chemotherapy are unclear. In this review we analyze recent data on the epidemiology, oncogenesis, prognosis and specific therapeutic strategies in both early and advanced SRCC of the stomach and in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer.
Collapse
|
81
|
Abstract
PET imaging has contributed substantially in oncology by allowing improved clinical staging and guiding appropriate cancer management. Integration with radiotherapy planning via PET/computed tomography (CT) simulation enables improved target delineation, which is paramount for conformal radiotherapy techniques. This article reviews the present literature regarding implications of PET/CT for radiotherapy planning and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beant S Gill
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, 5230 Centre Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA
| | - Sarah S Pai
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Stacey McKenzie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, 5230 Centre Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA
| | - Sushil Beriwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, 5230 Centre Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Springfeld C, Wiecha C, Kunzmann R, Heger U, Weichert W, Langer R, Stange A, Blank S, Sisic L, Schmidt T, Lordick F, Jäger D, Grenacher L, Bruckner T, Büchler MW, Ott K. Influence of Different Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens on Response, Prognosis, and Complication Rate in Patients with Esophagogastric Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22 Suppl 3:S905-14. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4617-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2014] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
83
|
Putora PM, Bedenne L, Budach W, Eisterer W, Van Der Gaast A, Jäger R, Van Lanschot JJB, Mariette C, Schnider A, Stahl M, Ruhstaller T. Oesophageal cancer: exploring controversies overview of experts' opinions of Austria, Germany, France, Netherlands and Switzerland. Radiat Oncol 2015; 10:116. [PMID: 25994051 PMCID: PMC4461999 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-015-0418-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2015] [Accepted: 05/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Oesophageal carcinoma is a rare disease with often dismal prognosis. Despite multiple trials addressing specific issues, currently, many questions in management remain unanswered. This work aimed to specifically address areas in the management of oesophageal cancer where high level evidence is not available, performing trials is very demanding and for many questions high-level evidence will not be available in the forseeable future. Methods Two experts of each national, oesophageal cancer research group from Austria, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Switzerland were asked to provide statements to controversial issues. After an initial survey, further questions were formulated and answered by all experts. The answers were then discussed and qualitatively analysed for consensus and controversy. Results Topics such as indications for PET-CT, reasons for induction chemotherapy, radiotherapy dose, the choice of definitive chemo-radiotherapy versus surgery in squamous cell cancer, the role of radiotherapy in adenocarcinoma and selected surgical issues were identified as topics of interest and discussed. Conclusion Areas of significant controversy exist in the management of oesophageal cancer, mostly due to high-level evidence. This is not expected to change in the upcoming years. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13014-015-0418-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Martin Putora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, 9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
| | - Laurent Bedenne
- University Hospital Le Bocage, Dijon, France Federation Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD), Dijon, France.
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, German Oesophageal Study Group (GOSG), Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Wolfgang Eisterer
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Innsbruck Medical University, West-Austrian Study Group (AGMT), Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Ate Van Der Gaast
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, ChemoRadiotherapy for Oesophageal cancer versus Surgery alone Study Group (CROSS), Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Robert Jäger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Innsbruck Medical University, West-Austrian Study Group (AGMT), Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - J Jan B Van Lanschot
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, ChemoRadiotherapy for Oesophageal cancer versus Surgery alone Study Group (CROSS), Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Christophe Mariette
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Hospital Lille, Federation Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD), Lille, France.
| | - Annelies Schnider
- Department of Surgery, City-Hospital Triemli, Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Michael Stahl
- Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Klinik für Internistische Onkologie und Hämatologie, German Oesophageal Study Group (GOSG), Essen, Germany.
| | - Thomas Ruhstaller
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Preoperative treatment with radiochemotherapy for locally advanced gastroesophageal junction cancer and unresectable locally advanced gastric cancer. Radiol Oncol 2015; 49:163-72. [PMID: 26029028 PMCID: PMC4387993 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2014-0027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2014] [Accepted: 05/19/2014] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. To purpose of the study was to analyze the results of preoperative radiochemotherapy in patients with unresectable gastric or locoregionally advanced gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer treated at a single institution. Patients and methods. Between 1/2004 and 6/2012, 90 patients with locoregionally advanced GEJ or unresectable gastric cancer were treated with preoperative radiochemotherapy at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana. Planned treatment schedule consisted of induction chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin, followed by concomitant radiochemotherapy four weeks later. Three-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy was delivered by dual energy (6 and 15 MV) linear accelerator in 25 daily fractions of 1.8 Gy in 5 weeks with two additional cycles of chemotherapy repeated every 28 days. Surgery was performed 4–6 weeks after completing radiochemotherapy. Following the surgery, multidisciplinary advisory team reassessed patients for the need of adjuvant chemotherapy. The primary endpoints were histopathological R0 resection rate and pathological response rate. The secondary endpoints were toxicity of preoperative radiochemotherapy and survival. Results. Treatment with preoperative radiochemotherapy was completed according to the protocol in 84 of 90 patients (93.3%). Twenty patients (22.2%) did not undergo the surgery because of the disease progression, serious comorbidity, poor performance status or still unresectable tumour. In 13 patients (14.4%) only exploration was performed because the tumour was assessed as unresectable or diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis was established. Fifty-seven patients (63.4%) underwent surgery with the aim of complete removal of the tumour. Radical resection was achieved in 50 (55.6%) patients and the remaining seven (7.8%) patients underwent non-radical surgery (R1 in five and R2 in two patients). In this group of patients (n = 57), pathological complete response of tumour was achieved in five patients (5.6% of all treated patients or 8.8% of all operated patients). Down-staging was recorded in 49 patients (86%), in one patient (1.8%) the stage after radiochemotherapy was unchanged while in seven patients (12.3%) the pathological stage was higher than clinical, mainly due to higher pN stage. No death was recorded during preoperative radiochemotherapy. Most grade 3 and 4 toxicities were due to vomiting, nausea and bone marrow suppression (granulocytopenia). Twenty-six (45.6%) patients died due to GEJ or gastric carcinoma, one died because of septic shock following the surgery and a reason for two deaths was unknown. Twenty-eight patients (49.1%) were disease free at the time of analysis, while 29 patients (50.9%) developed the recurrence, mostly as distant metastases. At two years, locoregional control, disease-free survival, disease-specific survival and overall survival were 82.9%, 43.9%, 56.9% and 53.9%, respectively. Conclusions. Preoperative radiochemotherapy was feasible in our group of patients and had acceptable toxicity. Majority of patients achieved down-staging, allowing greater proportion of radical resections (R0), which are essential for patients’ cure.
Collapse
|
85
|
Abstract
Accurate pretherapeutic imaging is the cornerstone of all cancer treatment. Unfortunately, modern imaging modalities have several unsolved problems and limitations. The differentiation between inflammation and cancer infiltration, false positive and false negative findings as well as lack of confirming biopsies in suspected metastases may have serious negative consequences in cancer patients. This review describes some of these problems and challenges the use of conventional imaging by suggesting new combined strategies that include selective use of confirming biopsies and complementary methods to detect microscopic cancer dissemination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Bau Mortensen
- Department of Surgery, Upper GI Section and HPB Center, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Schirren R, Reim D, Novotny AR. Adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer? A perspective review. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2015; 7:39-48. [PMID: 25553082 PMCID: PMC4265092 DOI: 10.1177/1758834014558839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgery is still the only curative therapy for locoregional gastric cancer. Hereby it is important to achieve negative margins (R0 resection) and to perform an adequate lymph-node dissection (D2 lymphadenectomy). Unfortunately most cases of gastric cancer are diagnosed in a locally advanced tumor stage. The poor prognosis of patients with these tumors is due to the frequent recurrences after primary resection in curative intent. This observation led to the development of (neo)adjuvant treatment concepts. Beginning with the end of the 1980s, more and more patients with locally advanced tumors were subjected to a preoperative, perioperative, or postoperative treatment in order to improve the prognosis after curative resection. However, in different regions of the world, different regiments are preferred. While adjuvant chemotherapy is the established treatment in Asia, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is favored in the USA and perioperative chemotherapy is considered the treatment of choice in Europe. However, recently a certain convergence of the different philosophies is to be observed. This article covers the relevant studies dealing with neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment concepts and gives an overview on the latest developments in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniel Reim
- Technische Universität München - Surgery, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander R Novotny
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Consensus-based approaches provide an alternative to evidence-based decision making, especially in situations where high-level evidence is limited. Our aim was to demonstrate a novel source of information, objective consensus based on recommendations in decision tree format from multiple sources. METHODS Based on nine sample recommendations in decision tree format a representative analysis was performed. The most common (mode) recommendations for each eventuality (each permutation of parameters) were determined. The same procedure was applied to real clinical recommendations for primary radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Data was collected from 16 radiation oncology centres, converted into decision tree format and analyzed in order to determine the objective consensus. RESULTS Based on information from multiple sources in decision tree format, treatment recommendations can be assessed for every parameter combination. An objective consensus can be determined by means of mode recommendations without compromise or confrontation among the parties. In the clinical example involving prostate cancer therapy, three parameters were used with two cut-off values each (Gleason score, PSA, T-stage) resulting in a total of 27 possible combinations per decision tree. Despite significant variations among the recommendations, a mode recommendation could be found for specific combinations of parameters. CONCLUSION Recommendations represented as decision trees can serve as a basis for objective consensus among multiple parties.
Collapse
|
88
|
Duan XF, Tang P, Yu ZT. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable esophageal cancer: an in-depth study of randomized controlled trials and literature review. Cancer Biol Med 2014; 11:191-201. [PMID: 25364580 PMCID: PMC4197424 DOI: 10.7497/j.issn.2095-3941.2014.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2014] [Accepted: 06/19/2014] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) is a common multidisciplinary treatment for resectable esophageal cancer (EC). After analyzing 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we discuss the key issues of surgery in the management of resectable EC. Along with chemoradiotherapy, NCRT is recommended for patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC), and most chemotherapy regimens are based on cisplatin, fluorouracil (FU), or both (CF). However, taxane-based schedules or additional studies, together with newer chemotherapies, are warranted. In nine clinical trials, post-operative complications were similar without significant differences between two treatment groups. In-hospital mortality was significantly different in only 1 out of 10 trials. Half of the randomized trials that compare NCRT with surgery in EC demonstrate an increase in overall survival or disease-free survival. NCRT offers a great opportunity for margin negative resection, decreased disease stage, and improved loco-regional control. However, NCRT does not affect the quality of life when combined with esophagectomy. Future trials should focus on the identification of optimum regimens and selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from specific treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Feng Duan
- Department of Esophageal Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Peng Tang
- Department of Esophageal Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Zhen-Tao Yu
- Department of Esophageal Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Elliott JA, O'Farrell NJ, King S, Halpenny D, Malik V, Muldoon C, Johnston C, Reynolds JV. Value of CT–PET after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in the prediction of histological tumour regression, nodal status and survival in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 2014; 101:1702-11. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2014] [Revised: 08/01/2014] [Accepted: 09/10/2014] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The role of CT–PET after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) for prediction of pathological response and oncological outcome in oesophageal and junctional adenocarcinoma (OAC) is unclear. The relationship between complete metabolic response (cMR), pathological complete response (pCR) and nodal status has not been clarified.
Methods
Patients with locally advanced OAC selected to receive nCRT and surgery with curative intent, on the basis of staging that included CT–PET positivity, were included. Repeat scanning (PET2) with an identical protocol was performed 2–4 weeks after completion of nCRT (cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil plus 44 Gy radiation). Changes in [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake, considered as either a maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) or a relative reduction (%ΔSUVmax), and PET-predicted nodal status following nCRT were compared with histopathological response, histological node positivity and survival.
Results
One hundred consecutive patients with PET-positive OAC were studied. Following nCRT, PET2 identified M1 disease in 2·0 per cent of patients. There were no significant associations between PET2 SUVmax or %ΔSUVmax with respect to primary tumour stage (ypT) (P = 0.216 and P = 0·975 respectively), tumour regression grade (P = 0·109 and P = 0·232), pCR (P = 0·633 and P = 0·870) or complete resection (R0) (P = 0·440 and P = 0·235). The sensitivity of PET2 for ypN was 10 per cent. %ΔSUVmax was not associated with disease-free or overall survival (P = 0·162 and P = 0·154 respectively). Of 46 patients with a cMR on PET2, 37 (80 per cent) had histological evidence of residual tumour in the resected specimen, and cMR was not associated with overall survival benefit (P = 0·478).
Conclusion
CT–PET following nCRT for OAC has poor prognostic and discriminatory value for clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Elliott
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin and St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - N J O'Farrell
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin and St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - S King
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin and St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - D Halpenny
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin and St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - V Malik
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin and St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - C Muldoon
- Department of Pathology, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - C Johnston
- Department of Radiology, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - J V Reynolds
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin and St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
90
|
Antonakis PT, Ashrafian H, Isla AM. Laparoscopic gastric surgery for cancer: Where do we stand? World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:14280-14291. [PMID: 25339815 PMCID: PMC4202357 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2013] [Revised: 03/06/2014] [Accepted: 05/29/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer poses a significant public health problem, especially in the Far East, due to its high incidence in these areas. Surgical treatment and guidelines have been markedly different in the West, but nowadays this debate is apparently coming to an end. Laparoscopic surgery has been employed in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer for two decades now, but with controversies about the extent of resection and lymphadenectomy. Despite these difficulties, the apparent advantages of the laparoscopic approach helped its implementation in early stage and distal gastric cancer, with an increase on the uptake for distal gastrectomy for more advanced disease and total gastrectomy. Nevertheless, there is no conclusive evidence about the laparoscopic approach yet. In this review article we present and analyse the current status of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of gastric cancer.
Collapse
|
91
|
Jacobs C, Graham ID, Makarski J, Chassé M, Fergusson D, Hutton B, Clemons M. Clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements in oncology--an assessment of their methodological quality. PLoS One 2014; 9:e110469. [PMID: 25329669 PMCID: PMC4201546 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2014] [Accepted: 09/22/2014] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Consensus statements and clinical practice guidelines are widely available for enhancing the care of cancer patients. Despite subtle differences in their definition and purpose, these terms are often used interchangeably. We systematically assessed the methodological quality of consensus statements and clinical practice guidelines published in three commonly read, geographically diverse, cancer-specific journals. Methods Consensus statements and clinical practice guidelines published between January 2005 and September 2013 in Current Oncology, European Journal of Cancer and Journal of Clinical Oncology were evaluated. Each publication was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) rigour of development and editorial independence domains. For assessment of transparency of document development, 7 additional items were taken from the Institute of Medicine's standards for practice guidelines and the Journal of Clinical Oncology guidelines for authors of guidance documents. METHODS Consensus statements and clinical practice guidelines published between January 2005 and September 2013 in Current Oncology, European Journal of Cancer and Journal of Clinical Oncology were evaluated. Each publication was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) rigour of development and editorial independence domains. For assessment of transparency of document development, 7 additional items were taken from the Institute of Medicine's standards for practice guidelines and the Journal of Clinical Oncology guidelines for authors of guidance documents. FINDINGS Thirty-four consensus statements and 67 clinical practice guidelines were evaluated. The rigour of development score for consensus statements over the three journals was 32% lower than that of clinical practice guidelines. The editorial independence score was 15% lower for consensus statements than clinical practice guidelines. One journal scored consistently lower than the others over both domains. No journals adhered to all the items related to the transparency of document development. One journal's consensus statements endorsed a product made by the sponsoring pharmaceutical company in 64% of cases. CONCLUSION Guidance documents are an essential part of oncology care and should be subjected to a rigorous and validated development process. Consensus statements had lower methodological quality than clinical practice guidelines using AGREE II. At a minimum, journals should ensure that that all consensus statements and clinical practice guidelines adhere to AGREE II criteria. Journals should consider explicitly requiring guidelines to declare pharmaceutical company sponsorship and to identify the sponsor's product to enhance transparency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmel Jacobs
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ian D. Graham
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and University of Ottawa, Department of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Michaël Chassé
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dean Fergusson
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and University of Ottawa, Department of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brian Hutton
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark Clemons
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and University of Ottawa, Department of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
Gallamini A, Zwarthoed C, Borra A. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology. Cancers (Basel) 2014; 6:1821-89. [PMID: 25268160 PMCID: PMC4276948 DOI: 10.3390/cancers6041821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 217] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2014] [Revised: 07/25/2014] [Accepted: 08/07/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Since its introduction in the early nineties as a promising functional imaging technique in the management of neoplastic disorders, FDG-PET, and subsequently FDG-PET/CT, has become a cornerstone in several oncologic procedures such as tumor staging and restaging, treatment efficacy assessment during or after treatment end and radiotherapy planning. Moreover, the continuous technological progress of image generation and the introduction of sophisticated software to use PET scan as a biomarker paved the way to calculate new prognostic markers such as the metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and the total amount of tumor glycolysis (TLG). FDG-PET/CT proved more sensitive than contrast-enhanced CT scan in staging of several type of lymphoma or in detecting widespread tumor dissemination in several solid cancers, such as breast, lung, colon, ovary and head and neck carcinoma. As a consequence the stage of patients was upgraded, with a change of treatment in 10%-15% of them. One of the most evident advantages of FDG-PET was its ability to detect, very early during treatment, significant changes in glucose metabolism or even complete shutoff of the neoplastic cell metabolism as a surrogate of tumor chemosensitivity assessment. This could enable clinicians to detect much earlier the effectiveness of a given antineoplastic treatment, as compared to the traditional radiological detection of tumor shrinkage, which usually takes time and occurs much later.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Gallamini
- Department of Research and Medical Innovation, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, Nice University, Nice Cedex 2-06189 Nice, France.
| | - Colette Zwarthoed
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, Nice University, Nice Cedex 2-06189 Nice, France.
| | - Anna Borra
- Hematology Department S. Croce Hospital, Via M. Coppino 26, Cuneo 12100, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
93
|
Lin D, Leichman L. The current status of neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 26:102-9. [PMID: 25441001 DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2014.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/11/2014] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Through the contribution of a very large number of single-arm phase II trials and many less randomized phase III trials, the standard of care for locally advanced esophageal cancer has evolved to either combination chemotherapy plus radiation or combination chemotherapy. In this review, we focus on the key findings of these studies and selected meta-analyses that have led to this evolution. We note differences in outcomes for adenocarcinomas of the esophagus when compared to squamous cell esophageal cancers. Despite progress in developing a consensus for therapy, the outcome for patients with locally advanced remains poor. We complete the review by noting newer areas of investigation seeking to provide targeted and more personalized therapy to patients with esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Lin
- Department of Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York; Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Lawrence Leichman
- Department of Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York; Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
94
|
Soon YY, Leong CN, Tey JCS, Tham IWK, Lu JJ. Postoperative chemo-radiotherapy versus chemotherapy for resected gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2014; 58:483-96. [PMID: 24995607 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2014] [Accepted: 04/17/2014] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (direct and indirect) of published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the effects of postoperative chemo-radiotherapy (ChRT) with chemotherapy (Ch) on overall and disease-free survival (DFS) for patients with resectable gastric cancer. METHODS We searched MEDLINE and CENTRAL from the date of inception and annual meeting proceedings of American Society of Clinical Oncology and American Society for Radiation Oncology from 1999 to November 2012 for RCTs comparing postoperative ChRT with Ch, postoperative ChRT with surgery alone and postoperative Ch with surgery alone. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes included DFS and toxicity. Hazard ratios (HRs), confidence intervals (CIs) and P values (P) were estimated with fixed effects models using Revman 5.1. RESULTS We found six trials comparing postoperative ChRT with Ch (n = 1171). Meta-analysis of direct comparison trials showed that postoperative ChRT significantly improved both OS (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.65-0.98, P = 0.03) and DFS (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63-0.91, P = 0.003) when compared with Ch. There were no significant differences in toxicity between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests a survival benefit of postoperative ChRT over Ch in patients with resected gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Yang Soon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
95
|
Gomez-Martín C, Lopez-Rios F, Aparicio J, Barriuso J, García-Carbonero R, Pazo R, Rivera F, Salgado M, Salud A, Vázquez-Sequeiros E, Lordick F. A critical review of HER2-positive gastric cancer evaluation and treatment: from trastuzumab, and beyond. Cancer Lett 2014; 351:30-40. [PMID: 24943493 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2014] [Revised: 04/03/2014] [Accepted: 05/16/2014] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Identification of the importance of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) status, biomarker testing and the development of anti-HER2 treatments have changed the prognosis of breast and gastric cancers. The addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy has improved outcomes for patients with HER2-positive metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach and gastroesophageal junction, but some relevant issues remain to be elucidated or will emerge with new drugs. This article reviews the current state of HER2 in gastric cancer focusing on diagnostic and anti-HER2 targeted treatment issues and the role of trastuzumab in localized disease, and its combination or integration with new therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Gomez-Martín
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Unit and Early Drug Development Unit, Medical Oncology Division, "12 de Octubre" University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Laboratorio de Dianas Terapéuticas, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, Hospital Universitario Madrid Sanchinarro, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad San Pablo CEU, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Fernando Lopez-Rios
- Laboratorio de Dianas Terapéuticas, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, Hospital Universitario Madrid Sanchinarro, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad San Pablo CEU, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jorge Aparicio
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jorge Barriuso
- Upper GI Unit, Oncology Department, La Paz University Hospital-IdIPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rocio García-Carbonero
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBIS), Universidad de Sevilla, CSIC, HUVR, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Roberto Pazo
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Fernando Rivera
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | - Mercedes Salgado
- Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain
| | - Antonieta Salud
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova de Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| | | | - Florian Lordick
- University Cancer Center Leipzig, University Clinic Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
96
|
Repici A, Genco C, Anderloni A, Spaggiari P, Mineri R, Minieri R, Carlino A, Jovani M, Villanacci V, Sharma P, Malesci A. A case of esophageal squamous cell intraepithelial neoplasia with positivity for type 16 human papillomavirus successfully treated with radiofrequency ablation. J Gastrointest Oncol 2014; 5:E36-9. [PMID: 24772344 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2014.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2014] [Accepted: 03/04/2014] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is the eight most common cancer worldwide and the sixth cause of cancer related death with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) accounting for almost half of all esophageal cancers. Persistent human papilloma virus (HPV) infection has been suspected to play an active role in esophageal carcinogenesis but a clear association has not still been proven and no specific indications or guidelines for possible endoscopic and surgical therapeutic approaches to this clinical scenario are available. We report a case of a 62-year-old woman with histological diagnosis of high-grade intraepithelial squamous neoplasia of distal esophagus associated with cytological modifications resembling cervical HPV infection and with a positive INNO-LiPA assay for genotype 16 HPV. A single session of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was performed on the dysplastic esophageal area with complete endoscopic eradication as confirmed by the following endoscopic, histologic and microbiologic examinations. Our report might give further strength to the hypothesis of an etiological role of HPV in selected cases of esophageal carcinogenesis and opens a discussion on the possible use of Radio Frequency Ablation as an effective and safe endoscopic treatment for both early squamous cell neoplasia and HPV esophageal colonization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Repici
- 1 Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy ; 2 Department of Gastroenterology, DIBIMIS, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy ; 3 Department of Pathology, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy ; 4 Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, Pathology Section, Brescia, Italy ; 5 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Chiara Genco
- 1 Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy ; 2 Department of Gastroenterology, DIBIMIS, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy ; 3 Department of Pathology, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy ; 4 Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, Pathology Section, Brescia, Italy ; 5 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- 1 Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy ; 2 Department of Gastroenterology, DIBIMIS, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy ; 3 Department of Pathology, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy ; 4 Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, Pathology Section, Brescia, Italy ; 5 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Paola Spaggiari
- 1 Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy ; 2 Department of Gastroenterology, DIBIMIS, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy ; 3 Department of Pathology, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy ; 4 Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, Pathology Section, Brescia, Italy ; 5 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Rossana Mineri
- 1 Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy ; 2 Department of Gastroenterology, DIBIMIS, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy ; 3 Department of Pathology, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy ; 4 Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, Pathology Section, Brescia, Italy ; 5 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | | | - Alessandra Carlino
- 1 Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy ; 2 Department of Gastroenterology, DIBIMIS, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy ; 3 Department of Pathology, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy ; 4 Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, Pathology Section, Brescia, Italy ; 5 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Manol Jovani
- 1 Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy ; 2 Department of Gastroenterology, DIBIMIS, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy ; 3 Department of Pathology, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy ; 4 Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, Pathology Section, Brescia, Italy ; 5 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Vincenzo Villanacci
- 1 Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy ; 2 Department of Gastroenterology, DIBIMIS, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy ; 3 Department of Pathology, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy ; 4 Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, Pathology Section, Brescia, Italy ; 5 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Prateek Sharma
- 1 Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy ; 2 Department of Gastroenterology, DIBIMIS, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy ; 3 Department of Pathology, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy ; 4 Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, Pathology Section, Brescia, Italy ; 5 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Alberto Malesci
- 1 Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy ; 2 Department of Gastroenterology, DIBIMIS, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy ; 3 Department of Pathology, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy ; 4 Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, Pathology Section, Brescia, Italy ; 5 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
Lordick F, Allum W, Carneiro F, Mitry E, Tabernero J, Tan P, Van Cutsem E, van de Velde C, Cervantes A. Unmet needs and challenges in gastric cancer: the way forward. Cancer Treat Rev 2014; 40:692-700. [PMID: 24656602 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 141] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2014] [Accepted: 03/04/2014] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Although the incidence of gastric cancer has fallen steadily in developed countries over the past 50 years, outcomes in Western countries remain poor, primarily due to the advanced stage of the disease at presentation. While earlier diagnosis would help to improve outcomes for patients with gastric cancer, better understanding of the biology of the disease is also needed, along with advances in therapy. Indeed, progress in the treatment of gastric cancer has been limited, mainly because of its genetic complexity and heterogeneity. As a result, there is an urgent need to apply precision medicine to the management of the disease in order to ensure that individuals receive the most appropriate treatment. This article suggests a number of strategies that may help to accelerate progress in treating patients with gastric cancer. Incorporation of some of these approaches could help to improve the quality of life and survival for patients diagnosed with the disease. Standardisation of care across Europe through expansion of the European Registration of Cancer Care (EURECCA) registry - a European cancer audit that aims to improve quality and decrease variation in care across the region - may also be expected to lead to improved outcomes for those suffering from this common malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Lordick
- University Cancer Center Leipzig (UCCL), University Clinic Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - William Allum
- Department of Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Fátima Carneiro
- IPATIMUP and Medical Faculty/Centro Hospitalar de São João, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Emmanuel Mitry
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie and EA4340, Faculty of Medicine, University of Versailles St-Quentin, Paris, France.
| | - Josep Tabernero
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Patrick Tan
- Cancer and Stem Cell Biology Program, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School and Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Eric Van Cutsem
- Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | - Andrés Cervantes
- Biomedical Research Institute IINCLIVA, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
98
|
Schmidt T, Sicic L, Blank S, Becker K, Weichert W, Bruckner T, Parakonthun T, Langer R, Büchler MW, Siewert JR, Lordick F, Ott K. Prognostic value of histopathological regression in 850 neoadjuvantly treated oesophagogastric adenocarcinomas. Br J Cancer 2014; 110:1712-20. [PMID: 24569472 PMCID: PMC3974097 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.94] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2013] [Revised: 01/21/2014] [Accepted: 01/27/2014] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Recently, histopathological tumour regression, prevalence of signet ring cells, and localisation were reported as prognostic factors in neoadjuvantly treated oesophagogastric (junctional and gastric) cancer. This exploratory retrospective study analyses independent prognostic factors within a large patient cohort after preoperative chemotherapy including clinical and histopathological factors. Methods: In all, 850 patients presenting with oesophagogastric cancer staged cT3/4 Nany cM0/x were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by resection in two academic centres. Patient data were documented in a prospective database and retrospectively analysed. Results: Of all factors prognostic on univariate analysis, only clinical response, complications, ypTNM stage, and R category were independently prognostic (P<0.01) on multivariate analysis. Tumour localisation and signet ring cells were independently prognostic only when investigator-dependent clinical response evaluation was excluded from the multivariate model. Histopathological tumour regression correlates with tumour grading, Laurén classification, clinical response, ypT, ypN, and R categories but was not identified as an independent prognostic factor. Within R0-resected patients only surgical complications and ypTNM stage were independent prognostic factors. Conclusions: Only established prognostic factors like ypTNM stage, R category, and complications were identified as independent prognostic factors in resected patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In contrast, histopathological tumour regression was not found as an independent prognostic marker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Schmidt
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - L Sicic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - S Blank
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - K Becker
- Department of Pathology, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - W Weichert
- Department of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T Bruckner
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics (IMBI), University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T Parakonthun
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - R Langer
- Department of Pathology, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - M W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J-R Siewert
- Directorate, University of Freiburg, 79095 Freiburg, Germany
| | - F Lordick
- University Cancer Center Leipzig (UCCL), University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - K Ott
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
99
|
Nishijima DK, Dinh T, May L, Yadav K, Gaddis GM, Cone DC. Quantifying federal funding and scholarly output related to the academic emergency medicine consensus conferences. ACADEMIC MEDICINE : JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES 2014; 89:176-81. [PMID: 24280853 PMCID: PMC4018650 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000000073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Every year since 2000, Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) has presented a one-day consensus conference to generate a research agenda for advancement of a scientific topic. One of the 12 annual issues of AEM is reserved for the proceedings of these conferences. The purpose of this study was to measure academic productivity of these conferences by evaluating subsequent federal research funding received by authors of conference manuscripts and calculating citation counts of conference papers. METHOD This was a cross-sectional study. In 2012, the NIH RePORTER system was searched to identify subsequent federal funding obtained by authors of the consensus conference issues from 2000 to 2010. Funded projects were coded as related or unrelated to conference topic. Citation counts for all conference manuscripts were quantified using Scopus and Google Scholar. Simple descriptive statistics were reported. RESULTS Eight hundred fifty-two individual authors contributed to 280 papers published in the 11 consensus conference issues. One hundred thirty-seven authors (16%) obtained funding for 318 projects. A median of 22 topic-related projects per conference (range 10-97) accounted for a median of $20,488,331 per conference (range $7,779,512 to $122,918,205). The average (± SD) number of citations per paper was 15.7 ± 20.5 in Scopus and 23.7 ± 32.6 in Google Scholar. CONCLUSIONS The authors of consensus conference manuscripts obtained significant federal grant support for follow-up research related to conference themes. In addition, the manuscripts generated by these conferences were frequently cited. Conferences devoted to research agenda development appear to be an academically worthwhile endeavor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel K Nishijima
- Dr. Nishijima is assistant professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California. Ms. Dinh is research coordinator, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California. Dr. May is assistant professor and associate director of clinical research, Department of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC. Dr. Yadav is assistant professor and clinical research fellowship director, Department of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC. Dr. Gaddis is St. Luke's/Missouri Endowed Chair for Emergency Medicine and professor of emergency medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine. Dr. Cone is professor and EMS section chief, Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
100
|
Burtness B, Ilson D, Iqbal S. New directions in perioperative management of locally advanced esophagogastric cancer. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2014:e172-e178. [PMID: 24857100 DOI: 10.14694/edbook_am.2014.34.e172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Cancers of the esophagus arise as adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas; these represent distinct diseases, with differing prognosis, yet they are often studied in common trials. With surgery alone, 5 year survival for T2-T3N0 disease is less than 30% to 40%, and declines to less than 25% with nodal involvement. The CROSS randomly assigned patients to surgery alone or to weekly carboplatin/paclitaxel X 5 and 41.4 Gy concurrent radiotherapy, followed by surgery. Seventy-five percent of enrolled patients had adenocarcinoma. Preoperative combined-modality therapy improved R0 resection from 69% to 92% (p < 0.001 and improved median survival from 24 months to 49.4 months (p < 0.003). This regimen reduced both locoregional recurrence (34% to 14%; p < 0.001) and the development of peritoneal carcinomatosis (14% to 4%; p < 0.001). Systemic perioperative therapy may have a greater effect on distant disease, the predominant mode of failure for these patients, and current trials compare preoperative chemoradiation with periooperative systemic therapy. PET scan response during preoperative chemotherapy without radiotherapy correlates with improvements in pathologic response and with improved survival. Nonresponse on early PET scan allows identifıcation of patients for earlier surgery and discontinuation of ineffective preoperative chemotherapy, without survival detriment. There is no predictive benefıt for early PET scan during the course of chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy. The use of early PET scan during induction chemotherapy is being evaluated in CALGB/Alliance trial (NCT01333033). Molecular profıling has identifıed somatic gene mutations and pathways that may be oncogenic in upper gastrointestinal cancers. Potential targets include the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), HER2, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), fıbroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), MEK, and others. Targeted therapies with known survival benefit in esophagogastric cancer are currently limited to trastuzumab for HER2 overexpressing cancers, or ramicirumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Burtness
- From the Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - David Ilson
- From the Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Syma Iqbal
- From the Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|