Use of nivolumab in elderly patients with advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: results from the Italian cohort of an expanded access programme

Immunotherapy in older patients with cancer

Ageing implicates a remodeling of our immune system, which is a consequence of the physiological senescence of our cells and tissues coupled with environmental factors and chronic antigen exposure. An immune system that senesces includes more differentiated cells with accumulation of highly differentiated CD4 and CD8 T cells. The pool of naive T cells decreases with the exponential thymic involution induced by age. Differentiated T cells have similar, if not higher, functional capacities but scarce studies are looking at the impact of senescence among specific T cells. After a stimulation, other immune cells (monocytes, dendritic cells and NK) are functionally altered during ageing. It is as if the immune system was more efficient at the basal level, but less efficient after a stimulation in the old compared to young people, likely due to less reserve. Concerning the clinical impact, older people are more prone to certain pathogens and their clinical manifestations differ from the younger people. Severe flu and VZV reactivation are more frequent with an altered cellular response to vaccination. Vaccination failure can have detrimental consequences in people presenting frailty criteria. Old people frailty is majored by their comorbidities and diseases like cancer. Thus, chemotherapies are employed with circumspection in older patients. The use of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapies is therefore attractive, because of less side effects with a better response compared to chemotherapy. Old persons inclusion is lacking in current studies and clinical trials. Some subgroups or pooled analyses confirm the gain in response without increased toxicities in older patients but their inclusion criteria differ from the real-life practice. Specific studies focusing on this population are needed because of the increasing cancer incidence with age and the overall ageing of the population.

Clinical features affecting survival in metastatic NSCLC treated with immunotherapy: A critical review of published data

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent one of the main steps forward for the treatment of advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), without oncogenic driver alterations. Despite this recent progress, only a minority of patients achieve a broad and durable benefit and another proportion report poor survival and sometimes fast disease progression, confirming the need to optimise the patient's selection. To date, several issues are unsolved about how to personalise the immunotherapy treatment for individual patients. In this review, analysing data from pivotal randomised clinical trials (RCTs), we discuss patient baseline clinical and demographic features, including sex, age, ECOG performance status, smoking habit and specific site of metastases (liver, bone and brain) that may influence the efficacy outcomes in patients treated with ICIs. The high performance of the ICIs blurred the vision on different efficacy-limiting factors, which require extensive evaluation to improve the understanding ofthe tumour-specificimmune response, in which clinical drivers could be useful for better patient stratification.

Do Elderly Lung Cancer Patients Aged ≥75 Years Benefit from Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors?

Lung cancer patients ≥75 years represent nearly 40% of all lung cancer patients and continue to increase. If elderly patients have a good performance status and adequate organ function, they can be treated the same as non-elderly patients. However, few comparative studies limited to elderly patients (≥75 years) have been conducted. We review the evidence on using immune check inhibitors for the treatment of elderly patients (≥75 years old) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Prospective randomized or non-randomized, retrospective, registrational, insurance-based, and community-based studies have shown that elderly (≥75 years) and non-elderly patients are similarly treated with immune check inhibitors effectively and safely. However, such analyses have not shown that immune check inhibitors are significantly more effective than chemotherapy alone. In addition, patient selection might be critically performed to administer immune check inhibitors in the elderly because they are more likely to have a poor performance status with comorbidities, which lead to little benefit, even in non-elderly patients. There is a need for more evidence showing the benefit of immune check inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients ≥75 years.

Nivolumab for Previously Treated Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer-Daily Practice versus Clinical Trials

Based on the results of the CheckMate 017 and CheckMate 057 studies, nivolumab therapy has become a new standard treatment for both squamous and non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, due to the specific inclusion criteria of these clinical trials, the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in real-world practice were not certain. In general, the real-world results of nivolumab treatment have been consistent with those obtained in clinical trials. Additional analyses of the real-world data have made the identification of prognostic factors possible. Good performance status is the most significant predictor of clinical benefit. Brain metastases, liver metastases, EGFR mutation, malignant pleural effusion, and a high number of metastatic sites were identified as negative prognostic factors. By contrast, a longer time to disease progression (>6 months) from the beginning of prior chemotherapy and an objective response to chemotherapy seem to have positive prognostic value in the case of nivolumab treatment. In terms of patient age, the data are inconclusive. Some blood biomarkers can also be considered significant prognostic factors.

Age-based efficacy and safety of nivolumab for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A multicenter retrospective study

AIM

This study retrospectively investigated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) classified using age <65 years as the cutoff.

METHODS

Overall, 88 patients with R/M HNSCC treated with nivolumab were classified into the young group (<65 years; n = 39) and elderly group (≥65 years; n = 49). Efficacy was evaluated using overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Safety was evaluated considering immune-related adverse events (irAEs).

RESULTS

The median OS was 9.7 and 8.6 months in the young and elderly groups, respectively. The 1-year OS rate was 42.0% and 29.4% in the young and elderly groups, respectively. The median PFS was 3.0 and 4.2 months in the young and elderly groups, respectively. The 1-year PFS rate was 30.0% and 27.9% in the young and elderly groups, respectively. In the young group, the ORR was 10.3% and DCR was 33.3%. In the elderly group, the ORR was 18.4% and DCR was 53.1%. There were no significant differences in OS, PFS, ORR, and DCR (P = 0.36, 0.53, 0.29 and 0.06, respectively). Interstitial lung disease (ILD) as an irAE occurred in the young group at a significantly higher rate (20.5% vs 4.1%; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in OS, PFS, ORR, and DCR between the young and elderly groups. DCR tended to be better in the elderly group (P = 0.06). ILD occurred at a significantly higher rate in the young group.

Real world data in the era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs): Increasing evidence and future applications in lung cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed death 1 (PD-1) and PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) quickly subverted the standard of treatment in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), where they were first introduced in all comers previously treated advanced/metastatic NSCLC patients and subsequently in the first line of PD-L1 selected cases of metastatic and locally advanced disease. Treatment algorithm is an evolving landscape, where the introduction of front-line ICIs, with or without chemotherapy, unavoidably influences the following treatment lines. In this context, medical oncologists are currently facing many unclear issues, which have been not clarified so far by available data. Effectiveness and safety in special populations underrepresented in clinical trials - such as elderly, poor PS, hepatitis or human immunodeficiency virus-affected patients - are only a part of the unexplored side of ICIs in the real world. Indeed, pivotal randomized clinical trials (RCTs) often lack of external validity because eligibility criteria exclude some patient subgroups commonly treated in real-world clinical practice. Similarly, cost-effectiveness and sustainability of these innovative agents are important issues to be considered in the real-world. Though affected by several limitations, real-world evidence (RWE) studies allow to collect data regarding overall treated patients in clinical practice according to local authority regulations, overcoming the intrinsic limits of RCTs. The present review focuses on RWE about ICIs in lung cancer treatment, with particular reference to special patient populations, and discusses potential application of real-world data in a potential innovative drug development model.

Real-World Experience of Nivolumab in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Korea

Purpose

The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors represents a major advance in the treatment of lung cancer, allowing sustained recovery in a significant proportion of patients. Nivolumab is a monoclonal anti–programmed death cell protein 1 antibody licensed for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after prior chemotherapy. In this study, we describe the demographic and clinical outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with nivolumab in the Korean expanded access program.

Materials and Methods

Previously treated patients with advanced non-squamous and squamous NSCLC patients received nivolumab at 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks up to 36 months. Efficacy data including investigator-assessed tumor response, progression data, survival, and safety data were collected.

Results

Two hundred ninety-nine patients were treated across 36 Korean centers. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 18% and 49%, respectively; the median progression-free survival was 2.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.87 to 3.45), and the overall survival (OS) was 13.2 months (95% CI, 10.6 to 18.9). Patients with smoking history and patients who experienced immune-related adverse events showed a prolonged OS. Cox regression analysis identified smoking history, presence of immune-related adverse events as positive factors associated with OS, while liver metastasis was a negative factor associated with OS. The safety profile was generally comparable to previously reported data.

Conclusion

This real-world analysis supports the use of nivolumab for pretreated NSCLC patients, including those with an older age.

Effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in the treatment of lung cancer patients in France: preliminary results from the real-world EVIDENS study

EVIDENS is an ongoing, prospective, non-interventional study evaluating the effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in lung cancer patients in France (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03382496).

Adults with a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of lung cancer and initiating treatment with nivolumab were recruited from 146 sites in France. This analysis included only patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received ≥1 nivolumab infusion, and evaluated patient characteristics at the time of nivolumab initiation and its effectiveness and safety after a median follow-up of 18 months.

A total of 1,420 patients with NSCLC were included, most of whom had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0–1 (82.9%), non-squamous histology (69.2%) and stage IV disease (91.4%). Brain metastases were present in 19.9% of patients. Nivolumab was a second-line or ≥third-line regimen in 73.6% and 26.1% of patients, respectively. Almost all patients had prior chemotherapy (99.7%). Median overall survival was 11.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.0–12.4). ECOG PS, smoking status, corticosteroids at baseline, epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status, presence of symptomatic brain metastases and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were independent predictors of survival. Grade 3 and 4 TRAEs were reported in 105 (7.4%) and 12 (0.8%) patients, respectively; no treatment-related deaths were reported.

Preliminary results of the EVIDENS study confirm the effectiveness and safety of nivolumab, mostly in pre-treated advanced NSCLC patients, with similar benefits to those observed in the phase III randomized clinical trials, despite a broader study population.

Immunotherapy: From Advanced NSCLC to Early Stages, an Evolving Concept

Immunotherapy in lung cancer treatment is a long history paved with failures and some successes. During the last decade, the discovery of checkpoints inhibitors led to major advances in treating advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Impressive data from early phase I-II studies were subsequently confirmed in large prospective randomized trials and meta-analyses (High-level of evidence). Three anti- programmed death-1 (PD1) (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) or antiPD-ligand(L)1 (atezolizumab) antibodies showed clinically significant improved survival compared to second-line docetaxel. Then, first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy demonstrated its superiority over platinum-doublet in high PD-L1 NSCLC. The addition of pembrolizumab or atezolizumab to chemotherapy derived the same results regardless of the PD-L1 status. On the opposite, antiCTLA4 (Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Associated 4) results are currently disappointing in unselected patients while recent development suggest that the combination of antiPD1 and antiCTLA4 (nivolumab-ipilimumab) positively impact on overall survival. Some secondary analyses also showed that immunotherapy has a positive impact on quality of life and that the clinical improvement can be done at an acceptable incremental cost per QALY. A lot of questions remain unresolved: which is the best treatment duration and is it the same for all patients, how to choose the patients that will have the highest benefit of immunotherapy, how to identify the patients who will have rapid progression, how to improve the current data (new targets, new combinations)….

Side effects of immunotherapy: a constant challenge for oncologists

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immunotherapeutic strategies have become the new paradigm of cancer care, through their new targeting and safety profile approach, and, de facto, their new monitoring and safety management challenges.

RECENT FINDINGS

Generalities and specificities of the toxicity management related to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are highlighted. Predictive factors of safety are issue of research and the challenge of prevention as well as monitoring are huge to alleviate toxicities and enhance safety and efficacy. Particular situations like steroids association and cost-effectiveness approach are summarized.

SUMMARY

Patients as well as general practitioners, including health-caregivers, should be informed before ICI initiation of the different alert symptoms which should precede immune-related adverse events.

Treatment rationale and design of the PROLONG study: safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab as first-line therapy for elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Pembrolizumab is recommended as first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a Programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) of ≥50% without driver mutations. However, the safety and efficacy were not investigated among patients who were ≥75 years old.

Methods

This open-label single-arm phase II study is designed to evaluate pembrolizumab as first-line therapy for patients who are ≥75 years old with advanced NSCLC and a PD-L1 TPS of ≥50% without driver mutations. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival, and the secondary endpoints are overall survival, objective response rate, safety, and quality of life. Recruitment started in October 2017 and is expected to continue for approximately 3 years.

Conclusions

Given the currently poor prognosis of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC, we hope that the findings of this study will facilitate more effective treatment in this setting.

CheckMate 171: A phase 2 trial of nivolumab in patients with previously treated advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer, including ECOG PS 2 and elderly populations

BACKGROUND

CheckMate 171 (NCT02409368) is an open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial of nivolumab in previously treated advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), conducted as part of a post-approval commitment to the European Medicines Agency (EMA). We report outcomes from this trial.

METHODS

Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-2 and disease progression during/after ≥1 systemic treatment (≥1 being platinum-based chemotherapy) for advanced or metastatic disease were treated with nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end-point was incidence of grade 3-4 treatment-related select adverse events (AEs). Other end-points included overall survival (OS) and safety.

RESULTS

Of 811 patients treated, 103 had ECOG PS 2; 278 were aged ≥70 years and 125 were ≥75 years of age. Minimum follow-up was ~18 months. Safety was similar across populations; the most frequent grade 3-4 treatment-related select AEs in all treated patients were diarrhoea (1%), increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT, 1%), pneumonitis (0.7%), colitis (0.6%) and increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST, 0.5%). Median OS was similar in all treated patients and those aged ≥70 and ≥75: 10.0 months, 10.0 months and 11.2 months, respectively. Median OS was 5.2 months in patients with ECOG PS 2.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that nivolumab is well tolerated and active in patients with advanced, relapsed squamous NSCLC, including the elderly, with OS outcomes consistent with phase 3 data. In patients with ECOG PS 2, nivolumab had similar tolerability, but outcomes were worse, as expected in this difficult-to-treat, poor prognosis population.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02409368.

The progress and confusion of anti-PD1/PD-L1 immunotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Recently, immunotherapy has evolved into a true treatment modality with the approval of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors as the standard care for first-line treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Until now, for patients with advanced NSCLC, treatment of targeting immune checkpoints reveals a promising survival benefit, and some patients even get long term survive, which creates a paradigm shift in NSCLC treatment. However, many issues or problems are also appearing in clinical practice, such as the lower overall efficacy rate (20-40%), treatment modes, populations choice of immunotherapy, drug resistance, and safety, etc. Thus, in this review, we will mainly summarize and discuss the recent development and confusion of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for advanced NSCLC patients based on current clinical studies.

The efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients of different age groups: a meta-analysis

Background

Age is closely related to the efficacy of treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Latest clinical trials have proved the better overall survival (OS) for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors verse chemotherapy in NSCLC patients. However, we had no clear idea of the efficacy of them in elderly patients. So we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for NSCLC patients of different age groups and summarized overall treatment-related adverse events.

Materials and methods

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched for all clinical trials in NSCLC until 30th of April 2019. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy in NSCLC patients. The hazard ratio (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of OS, progression-free survival or adverse events (AEs) were used.

Results

A total of 4994 patients from 8 RCTs were included. Immune checkpoint inhibitors significantly prolonged the OS (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.61–0.89) versus chemotherapy in NSCLC patients who were less than 65 years old. Also, they prolonged the OS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59–0.93) in NSCLC patients who were more than 65 years old. However, there was no statistical significance of OS (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.57–1.30) among NSCLC patients who were more than 75 years old. It also showed that the single use of immune checkpoint inhibitors had fewer all-grade AEs.

Conclusion

Regardless of the NSCLC patients who were less or more than 65 years, immune checkpoint inhibitors could achieve better OS than chemotherapy. But there was no significant difference when NSCLC patients who were more than 75 years old. Older patient should be offered immune therapies if it is possible and the mechanism in old age treatment should be further studied.

Bone metastases and immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Bone metastases (BoM) are a negative prognostic factor in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Beyond its supportive role, bone is a hematopoietic organ actively regulating immune system. We hypothesized that BoM may influence sensitivity to immunotherapy.

METHODS

Pretreated non-squamous (cohort A) and squamous (cohort B) NSCLCs included in the Italian Expanded Access Program were evaluated for nivolumab efficacy according to BoM.

RESULTS

Cohort A accounted for 1588 patients with non-squamous NSCLC, including 626 (39%) with (BoM+) and 962 (61%) without BoM (BoM-). Cohort B accounted for 371 patients with squamous histology including 120 BoM+ (32%) and 251 (68%) BoM- cases. BoM+ had lower overall response rate (ORR; Cohort A: 12% versus 23%, p <  0.0001; Cohort B: 13% versus 22%, p = 0.04), shorter progression free survival (PFS; Cohort A: 3.0 versus 4.0 months, p <  0.0001; Cohort B: 2.7 versus 5.2 months, p <  0.0001) and overall survival (OS; Cohort A: 7.4 versus 15.3 months, p <  0.0001; Cohort B: 5.0 versus 10.9 months, p < 0.0001). Moreover, BoM negatively affected outcome irrespective of performance status (PS; OS in both cohorts: p < 0.0001) and liver metastases (OS cohort A: p < 0.0001; OS Cohort B: p = 0.48). At multivariate analysis, BoM independently associated with higher risk of death (cohort A: HR 1.50; cohort B: HR 1.78).

CONCLUSIONS

BoM impairs immunotherapy efficacy. Accurate bone staging should be included in clinical trials with immunotherapy.

Co-mutations of TP53 and KRAS serve as potential biomarkers for immune checkpoint blockade in squamous-cell non-small cell lung cancer: a case report

BACKGROUND

Unprecedented durable responses are identified in clinical studies to target the signaling of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) as well as its ligand (PD-L1) in patients with squamous-cell non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, factors predicting the patient subtypes that are responsive to PD-1/PD-L1inhibitors have not been fully understood yet. Biomarkers, like PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden(TMB), DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), have been utilized to select patients responsive to PD-1/PD-L1inhibitors in the clinic, but each of them has limited use. Lung adenocarcinoma patients with a mutation of TP53 or KRAS, particularly those with co-mutations of TP53 and KRAS, can benefit from anti-PD-1 treatment.

CASE PRESENTATION

In this study, the co-mutations of TP53 and KRAS in a 64-year-old non-smoking man with squamous-cell NSCLC patient was described using the next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology. The patient was treated with the pembrolizumab combined with gemcitabine as the salvage therapy, and a marked partial response could be attained, which had persisted for over 7 months.

CONCLUSION

In addition to testing common driving genes, like EGFR, ALK, ROS1 and BRAF, both TP53, and KRAS should also be considered in advanced or metastatic squamous-cell NSCLC.TP53 and KRAS co-mutations in squamous-cell NSCLC can be a potential factor to assess possible response to PD-1 blockade immunotherapy, but further studies with more cases are needed to confirm the prediction power.

Immunosenescence and Its Hallmarks: How to Oppose Aging Strategically? A Review of Potential Options for Therapeutic Intervention

Aging is accompanied by remodeling of the immune system. With time, this leads to a decline in immune efficacy, resulting in increased vulnerability to infectious diseases, diminished responses to vaccination, and a susceptibility to age-related inflammatory diseases. An age-associated immune alteration, extensively reported in previous studies, is the reduction in the number of peripheral blood naïve cells, with a relative increase in the frequency of memory cells. These two alterations, together with inflamm-aging, are considered the hallmarks of immunosenescence. Because aging is a plastic process, it is influenced by both nutritional and pharmacological interventions. Therefore, the role of nutrition and of immunomodulation in immunosenescence is discussed, due to the multifactorial influence on these hallmarks. The close connection between nutrition, intake of bioactive nutrients and supplements, immune function, and inflammation demonstrate the key role of dietary strategies as regulators of immune response and inflammatory status, hence as possible modulators of the rate of immunosenescence. In addition, potential options for therapeutic intervention are clarified. In particular, the use of interleukin-7 as growth factor for naïve T cells, the function of checkpoint inhibitors in improving T cell responses during aging and, the potential of drugs that inhibit mitogen-activated protein kinases and their interaction with nutrient signaling pathways are discussed. Finally, it is suggested that the inclusion of appropriate combinations of toll-like receptor agonists may enhance the efficacy of vaccination in older adults.

Efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Most trials with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) included only small subgroups of patients aged ≥65. As NSCLC is often diagnosed in patients aged ≥70, real-world data about efficacy and safety of immunotherapy (IO) in elderly patients are essential.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected data about all patients with advanced NSCLC treated with IO at our Institution between April 2013 and March 2019. The patients were stratified for age as follows: <70 year-old, 70-79 year-old, ≥80 year-old. Chi-square test was used to compare qualitative variables. Survival was estimated with Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test was used to compare curves. Multivariate analyses were performed with Cox model.

RESULTS

We reviewed 290 cases, with a median age of 67 (range: 29-89). Patients aged<70, 70-79 and ≥80 year-old were 180, 94 and 16, respectively. Clinical/pathological variables were uniformly distributed across age classes, except for a higher rate of males (p 0.0228) and squamous histology (p 0.0071) in the intermediate class. Response Rate (RR) was similar across age groups (p 0.9470). Median Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) did not differ according to age (p 0.2020 and 0.9144, respectively). Toxicity was comparable across subgroups (p 0.6493). The only variables influencing outcome were performance status (PS) (p < 0.0001 for PFS, p 0.0192 for OS), number of metastatic sites (p 0.0842 for PFS, p 0.0235 for OS) and IO line (p < 0.0001 for both PFS and OS).

CONCLUSION

Advanced age was not associated to a reduced efficacy of IO in our case series. Furthermore, no toxicity concern emerged even among the eldest pts. To our opinion, ICIs should be considered irrespective of age, provided an optimal PS at baseline. Of note, IO is often the only therapeutic option applicable to these cases considering the toxicity of chemotherapy.

Non-small-cell lung cancer: what are the benefits and challenges of treating it with immune checkpoint inhibitors?

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment landscape of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It has improved the overall survival in the first- and second-line setting with manageable adverse events. Multiple challenges still impede the success of ICI in the whole population of NSCLC namely the lack of reliable predictive biomarkers, the scarcity of data regarding the optimal treatment duration with ICI and possibility of rechallenge with ICI as well as the efficacy of ICI in special subgroups of patients such as those with oncogenic addicted tumors or patients with brain metastases. In this framework, we review the benefits and challenges of ICI in NSCLC, in monotherapy and in combinations, in the advanced setting.

Nivolumab in disadvantaged subgroups of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer patients: a single-institution experience

Aim: Immunotherapy opened new frontiers in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer treatment, but not all patients benefit from it. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 65 metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer patients, treated with nivolumab, considering as disadvantaged subgroups those with poor performance status, elderly, patients with brain metastases at baseline, with high disease burden and refractory to platinum. Results: No differences in overall survival or time to treatment failure were found according to performance status, age, presence of brain metastases at baseline or high disease burden. Conversely, patients refractory to platinum had a statistically significant shorter overall survival and time to treatment failure. At multivariate analysis only platinum resistance was confirmed as an independent predictive factor. Conclusion: Our study suggests that only refractoriness to platinum salts influence the efficacy of nivolumab.

Elevated serum soluble programmed cell death ligand 1 concentration as a potential marker for poor prognosis in small cell lung cancer patients with chemotherapy

Background

Potential relationship between serum soluble programmed cell death ligand 1 and prognosis of small cell lung cancer is not well explored. The aim of the study was to reveal the prognostic significance of serum soluble programmed cell death ligand 1 in patients with small cell lung cancer.

Methods

A total of 250 small cell lung cancer patients and 250 controls were included. Research information was obtained from their medical records. Blood samples were collected on admission. Serum concentration of programmed cell death ligand 1 was measured using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay. The patients underwent cisplatin-etoposide chemotherapy with a maximum of six cycles. Subsequently, they were followed-up for 12 months, and therapeutic response and cancer death were recorded.

Results

Serum concentration of programmed cell death ligand 1 was higher in the patients than in the controls on admission (P < 0.001). After chemotherapy, 112 patients had no response to this therapy. In the 12-month follow up period, 118 patients died due to this cancer. Multivariate Cox regression model revealed that the higher serum concentration of programmed cell death ligand 1 on admission was associated with the higher risk of no response to chemotherapy or cancer caused death (HR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.05 ~ 1.87; HR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.08 ~ 1.87).

Conclusion

Elevated serum concentration of soluble programmed cell death ligand 1 might be an independent risk factor for non-response to chemotherapy and cancer caused death in small cell lung cancer patients.