51
|
Hoffman A, Amiel GE. The Impact of PSMA PET/CT on Modern Prostate Cancer Management and Decision Making-The Urological Perspective. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3402. [PMID: 37444512 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET use in prostate cancer treatment has recently become a routinely used imaging modality by urologists. New, established data regarding its performance in different stages of prostate cancer, as well as gaining clinical knowledge with new tracers, drives the need for urologists and other clinicians to improve the utilization of this tool. While the use of PSMA PET/CT is more common in metastatic disease, in which it outperforms classical imaging modalities and drives treatment decisions and adjustments, recently, it gained ground in localized prostate cancer as well, especially in high-risk disease. Still, PSMA PET/CT might reveal lesions within the prostate or possibly locoregional or metastatic disease, not always representing true cancer when utilized in earlier stages of the disease, potentially adding diagnostic burden and changing treatment decisions. As urological treatment options advance toward focal treatments in localized organ-confined prostate cancer, recent reports suggest the utilization of PSMA PET/CT in treatment planning and follow-up and even when choosing active surveillance. This review aims to reveal the current perspective of urologists regarding its daily use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Azik Hoffman
- Department of Urology, Rambam Health Care Center, Haifa 3109601, Israel
| | - Gilad E Amiel
- Department of Urology, Rambam Health Care Center, Haifa 3109601, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Wang T, Zhao L, Qiao W, Sun N, Zhao J, Xing Y. The efficacy of 99mTc-HYNIC-PSMA SPECT/CT in detecting primary lesions and metastasis in newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1165694. [PMID: 37333816 PMCID: PMC10272716 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1165694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Compared with PET/CT or PET/MRI, SPECT/CT is cheaper and more readily accessible. This study was designed to investigate the efficacy of 99mTc-HYNIC-PSMA SPECT/CT in detecting primary tumors and metastases in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa). Methods A retrospective analysis of 31 patients with pathologically proven PCa was performed at Shanghai General Hospital from November 2020 to November 2021. Planar whole-body imaging was performed on all patients with a SPECT/CT scan of PSMA-positive regions 3-4 h after intravenous injection of 740 MBq 99mTc-HYNIC-PSMA. Positive PSMA uptake lesions were evaluated, and SUVmean and SUVmax were measured in each lesion. Associations between SPECT/CT parameters and clinicopathologic factors (tPSA and Gleason Score) were analyzed. The diagnostic capability of SPECT/CT parameters, tPSA, and GS in distant metastatic detection was evaluated by logistic regression. Results The SUVmean and SUVmax of the high-risk stratification subgroups (tPSA>20 ng/ml, GS ≥8, and tPSA >20 ng/ml and GS≥8) were higher than those of the low-moderate risk stratification subgroups, with sensitivities of 92% and 92%, respectively. Neither SPECT/CT parameters (SUVmean, SUVmax) nor clinicopathologic factors (tPSA, GS) had high sensitivity (80%, 90%, 80%, and 90%, respectively, P <0.05) in distant metastatic prediction. For both the guideline tPSA level (20 ng/ml) and the cut-off level (84.3 ng/ml), the difference in the distant metastasis detection rate between the low predicted tPSA group and the high predicted tPSA group was statistically significant (0% vs. 47.62%, P = 0.005; 9.09% vs. 88.89%, P = 0.000, respectively). Twenty patients with pathological 99mTc-PSMA avid only in the prostate beds underwent radical prostatectomy. Seven of them underwent lymph node dissection, a total of 35 lymph nodes were removed, and no lymph nodes were detected with metastasis, which was consistent with 99mTc-HYNIC-PSMA SPECT/CT. Conclusion 99mTc-HYNIC-PSMA SPECT/CT is effective in the risk stratification and distant metastasis detection of primary PCa patients. It is of great value in guiding treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Yan Xing
- *Correspondence: Jinhua Zhao, ; Yan Xing,
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Rosiello G, Scilipoti P, Larcher A, Fallara G, Colandrea G, Basile G, Re C, Tian Z, Karakiewicz PI, Mottrie A, Trevisani F, Marandino L, Raggi D, Necchi A, Bertini R, Salonia A, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Capitanio U. Neglected lymph nodal metastases in patients with renal cancer: when to extend the anatomical template of lymph node dissection during nephrectomy. World J Urol 2023:10.1007/s00345-023-04413-z. [PMID: 37148324 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04413-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of lymph node dissection (LND) in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is still controversial. However, detecting lymph node invasion (LNI) is key due to prognostic implications and to identify patients who might benefit from adjuvant therapies such as adjuvant pembrolizumab. MATERIALS AND METHODS Out of 796 patients, 261 (33%) received eLND, of whom 62 (8%) for suspicious lymph node (LN) metastases at preoperative staging (cN1). eLND was divided in 3 anatomical areas: (1) hilar, (2) side-specific (pre-/para-aortic or pre-/para-caval) and (3) inter-aorto-caval nodes. Overall maximum LN diameter was measured by a dedicated radiologist for each patient. Multivariable logistic regression models (MVA) were tested for the effect of maximum LN diameter in predicting the presence of nodal metastases outside the anatomical area of cN1. RESULTS LNI was confirmed in 50% of cN1, whilst only 13 out of 199 cN0 patients were pN1 at final histology (6.5%; p < 0.001). In a per-patient analysis, of 62 cN1 patients, 24% vs. 18% vs. 8% harboured pN1 disease only inside vs. in-outside vs. only outside the suspicious anatomical field of cN1 at preoperative CT/MRI scan. At MVA, increasing diameter of suspicious LNs was independently associated with risk of finding positive LNs outside the suspicious anatomical field (OR 1.05, 95%CI 1.02-1.11; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Roughly 50% of cN1 patients undergoing eLND will harbour LN metastases, also outside the suspicious radiological area, and maximum LNs diameter at preoperative imaging correlates with such risk. Thus, an eLND might be justified in patients with large suspicious LN metastases, to better stage this patient population and to improve postoperative treatment management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Rosiello
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| | - Pietro Scilipoti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Fallara
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianmarco Colandrea
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Basile
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Re
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
- ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Francesco Trevisani
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Marandino
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Raggi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Bertini
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Salonia
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Schilham MGM, Rijpkema M, Scheenen T, Hermsen R, Barentsz JO, Sedelaar JPM, Kusters-Vandevelde H, Kerkmeijer LGW, Somford DM, Gotthardt M. Reply to Francesco Montorsi, Simone Scuderi, Alberto Briganti, and Giorgio Gandaglia's Letter to the Editor re: Melline G.M. Schilham, Mark Rijpkema, Tom Scheenen, et al. How Advanced Imaging Will Guide Therapeutic Strategies for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer in the Years to Come. Eur Urol 2022;82:578-80. Eur Urol 2023; 83:e133-e134. [PMID: 36781337 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.01.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Melline G M Schilham
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Mark Rijpkema
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tom Scheenen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rick Hermsen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle O Barentsz
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J P Michiel Sedelaar
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Linda G W Kerkmeijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Diederik M Somford
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Gotthardt
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Montorsi F, Scuderi S, Briganti A, Gandaglia G. Re: Melline G.M. Schilham, Mark Rijpkema, Tom Scheenen, et al. How Advanced Imaging Will Guide Therapeutic Strategies for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer in the Years to Come. Eur Urol 2022;82:578-80. Eur Urol 2023; 83:e132. [PMID: 36774224 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.12.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Scuderi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
[Radiologic evaluation of lymph nodes in cancer patients]. CHIRURGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2023; 94:105-113. [PMID: 36633653 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-022-01802-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In solid tumors, the detection of locoregional lymph node metastases is of decisive importance not only for the prognosis but also for selecting the correct treatment. Various noninvasive imaging methods or, classically, lymph node dissection are available for this purpose. OBJECTIVE This article presents the general principles of noninvasive lymph node diagnostics and discusses the value of the clinically available imaging modalities, ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET). In addition, recent new technical developments of each modality are highlighted. MATERIAL AND METHODS Literature search and summary of the clinical and scientific experience of the authors. RESULTS The available imaging procedures are divided into (1) morphological (US, CT, MRI) and (2) functional modalities (PET, special MRI). The former capture structural lymph node parameters, such as size and shape, while the latter address properties that go beyond morphology (e.g. glucose metabolism). The high diagnostic accuracy required for future treatment algorithms will require a combination of both aspects. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION Currently, none of the available modalities have sufficient accuracy to replace lymph node dissection in all oncological scenarios. One of the major challenges for interdisciplinary oncological research is to define the optimal interaction between imaging and lymph node dissection for different malignancies and tumor stages.
Collapse
|
57
|
Hayes M, Yu Y, Bassale S, Chakiryan N, Chen Y, Ye S, Garzotto M, Kopp R. Calibrated Regression Models Based on the Risk of Clinical Nodal Metastasis Should be Used as Decision Aids for Prostate Cancer Staging to Reduce Unnecessary Imaging. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 20:e490-e497. [PMID: 35649886 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radionuclide imaging will change the role of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) for prostate cancer (CaP) staging. Current guidelines recommend abdominopelvic imaging for new cases of CaP categorized as unfavorable intermediate risk (UIR) or higher. We assessed the performance characteristics of CT/MRI based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines and developed a model that predicts cN1 disease using conventional imaging. PATIENTS AND METHODS We selected patients in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with CaP from 2010 to 2016 with available age, prostate specific antigen, clinical locoregional staging, biopsy Gleason grading, and core information. Multivariate logistic regression (MLR) was used on a undersampled training dataset using cN1 as the outcome. Performance characteristics were compared to those of the three most recent versions of the NCCN guidelines. RESULTS A total of 443,640 men were included, and 2.5% had cN1 disease. Using CT/MRI only, the current NCCN guidelines have a sensitivity of 99%, and the number needed to image (NNI) is 24. At the same sensitivity, the cN1 risk was 1.6% using the MLR. The NNI for UIR alone is 341. Using the MLR model and a threshold of 10%, the PPV is 10.3% and 64% of CTs/MRIs could be saved at a cost of missing 6% of cN1 patients (or 0.15% of all patients). CONCLUSION The NCCN guidelines are sensitive for detecting cN1 with CT/MRI, however, the number needed to image is 24. Obtaining CT/MRI for nodal staging when patients have a cN1 risk of 10% would reduce total imaging while still remaining sensitive. As novel PET tracers becomes increasingly used for initial CaP staging, well calibrated prediction models trained on the outcome of interest should be developed as decision aids for obtaining imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell Hayes
- Department of Urology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Yun Yu
- Biostatistics Shared Resource, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Solange Bassale
- Biostatistics Shared Resource, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Yiyi Chen
- Biometrics, Seagen, Inc., Bothell, WA, USA
| | - Shangyuan Ye
- Biostatistics Shared Resource, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Mark Garzotto
- Department of Urology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Urology Section, VA Portland Healthcare System, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Ryan Kopp
- Department of Urology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Urology Section, VA Portland Healthcare System, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Wang Y, Tang Y, Gao X, Gan Y, Hu S, Chen MF, Cai Y. Optimization of prostate cancer patient lymph node staging via the integration of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratios, platelet-lymphocyte ratios, and 68 Ga-PSMA-PET-derived SUVmax values. Prostate 2022; 82:1415-1421. [PMID: 35860907 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND At present, standardized parameters for quantitatively evaluating 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT outcomes when diagnosing lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer patients are lacking. Inflammatory hematological biomarkers offer value as robust predictors of certain cancer-related outcomes. The present study was thus developed to explore approaches to improving the utility of 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT for diagnosing lymph node metastasis through the combined evaluation of inflammatory hematological markers in prostate cancer patients. METHODS Pretreatment patient details including age, initial TPSA levels, hematological findings, biopsy pathology results (Gleason score and ISUP grouping), radical pathology results, and imaging details were collected. Optimal cutoff values for each predictor then being determined based upon Youden's index, with univariate and multivariate analyses were then used to identify independent predictors of lymph node metastasis and used to construct a nomogram. RESULT Independent predictors of lymph node metastasis in this patient cohort included SUVmax (odds ratio [OR]: 30.549, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.855-85.973, p < 0.001), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (OR:8.221, 95%CI: 1.335-50.614, p = 0.023), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (OR:8.221, 95% CI: 1.335-50.614, p = 0.023), initial TPSA (OR:2.761, 95% CI: 1.132-6.733, p = 0.026), and clinical T-stage (T3 vs. T2, OR:11.332, 95% CI:3.929-32.681, p < 0.001; T4 vs. T2, OR:9.101, 95% CI:1.962-42.213, p = 0.005), with corresponding optimal cutoff values of 2.3 (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.873, sensitivity: 0.736, specificity: 0.902), 1.72 (AUC: 0.558, sensitivity: 0.529, specificity: 0.643), 83.305 (AUC: 0.651, sensitivity: 0.299, specificity: 0.979), and 21.875 (AUC: 0.672, sensitivity: 0.736, specificity: 0.601). Subsequent nomogram construction was associated with good predictive ability, with a C-index of 0.887(95% CI: 0.793-0.981) and an AUC of 0.924 (95% CI: 0.882-0.965). CONCLUSION SUVmax, the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, the platelet-lymphocyte ratio, initial TPSA, and clinical T-stage represent valuable independent predictors of lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer patients, offering an opportunity to further optimize lymph node staging for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yongxiang Tang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Disorders of Prostate Cancer Multidisciplinary Team, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha City, Hunan Province, China
| | - Xiaomei Gao
- Department of Pathology, Disorders of Prostate Cancer Multidisciplinary Team, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha City, Hunan Province, China
| | - Yu Gan
- Department of Urology, Disorders of Prostate Cancer Multidisciplinary Team, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha City, Hunan Province, China
| | - Shuo Hu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Disorders of Prostate Cancer Multidisciplinary Team, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha City, Hunan Province, China
| | - Min-Feng Chen
- Department of Urology, Disorders of Prostate Cancer Multidisciplinary Team, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha City, Hunan Province, China
| | - Yi Cai
- Department of Urology, Disorders of Prostate Cancer Multidisciplinary Team, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha City, Hunan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Combes AD, Palma CA, Calopedos R, Wen L, Woo H, Fulham M, Leslie S. PSMA PET-CT in the Diagnosis and Staging of Prostate Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:2594. [PMID: 36359439 PMCID: PMC9689635 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12112594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 08/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in men. The imaging assessment and treatment of prostate cancer has vastly improved over the past decade. The introduction of PSMA PET-CT has improved the detection of loco-regional and metastatic disease. PSMA PET-CT also has a role in the primary diagnosis and staging, in detecting biochemical recurrence after curative treatment and in metastasis-directed therapy. In this paper we review the role of PSMA PET-CT in prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander D. Combes
- Department of Urology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Catalina A. Palma
- Department of Urology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Ross Calopedos
- Department of Urology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Lingfeng Wen
- Department of Molecular Imaging, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Henry Woo
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Department of Urology, Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Michael Fulham
- Department of Molecular Imaging, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Scott Leslie
- Department of Urology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Department of Urology, Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Małkiewicz B, Bugla B, Czarnecki M, Karwacki J, Długosz P, Gurwin A, Kiełb P, Lemiński A, Krajewski W, Jędrzejuk D, Bolanowski M, Hałoń A, Szydełko T. Diagnostic Value of Radio-Guided Sentinel Node Detection in Patients with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy with Modified-Extended Lymphadenectomy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:5012. [PMID: 36291796 PMCID: PMC9599471 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14205012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Revised: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. In many malignancies, sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) is being used as a nodal staging tool. We prospectively evaluated the diagnostic value of radio-guided sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). This study aimed to investigate the reliability of the radio-guided SLN detection technique for perioperative localization of LNs metastases as well as to map lymphatic drainage patterns of the prostate. Methods. Forty-three patients with intermediate- or high-risk cN0cM0 PCa at conventional imaging underwent radical prostatectomy with modified-extended pelvic lymph node dissection (mePLND). A day before the planned surgery, a Tc-99m nanocolloid was injected into the prostate under the control of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS). Preoperative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT-CT) imaging and intraoperative gamma-probe were used to identify SLNs. All positive lesions were excised, followed by mePLND. The excised lymph nodes (LNs) were then submitted for histopathological examination, which was used as a reference for the calculation of diagnostic parameters of the SLN technique for SPECT-CT and the intraoperative gamma-probe. Results. In total, 119 SLNs were detected preoperatively (SPECT-CT) and 118 intraoperatively (gamma-probe). The study revealed that both SLN detection techniques showed a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 6.06%. The negative predictive value (NPV) was 66.67%. SLN technique would have correctly staged nine of 10 patients, which is the same result as in the case of limited LND. However, it allowed the removal of all metastatic nodes only in four of them. SLND would have comprised 69.7% of preoperatively detected LNs, and removed 13 out of 19 positive LNs (68.42%), respectively. Conclusions. Radio-guided SLND has a low diagnostic rate and is a poor staging tool. ePLND remains the gold standard in nodal metastases assessment in PCa. Our study indicates that lymphatic drainage of the prostate and actual metastasis routes may vary significantly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bartosz Małkiewicz
- University Center of Excellence in Urology, Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Błażej Bugla
- University Center of Excellence in Urology, Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Maciej Czarnecki
- University Center of Excellence in Urology, Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Jakub Karwacki
- University Center of Excellence in Urology, Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Paulina Długosz
- University Center of Excellence in Urology, Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Adam Gurwin
- University Center of Excellence in Urology, Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Paweł Kiełb
- University Center of Excellence in Urology, Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Artur Lemiński
- Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- University Center of Excellence in Urology, Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Diana Jędrzejuk
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Isotope Therapy, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland
| | - Marek Bolanowski
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Isotope Therapy, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Hałoń
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Wrocław Medical University, 50-556 Wrocław, Poland
| | - Tomasz Szydełko
- University Center of Excellence in Urology, Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at the Time of Radical Prostatectomy: Extended, of Course. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 44:13-14. [PMID: 36043188 PMCID: PMC9420501 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
|
62
|
Schilham MGM, Rijpkema M, Scheenen T, Hermsen R, Barentsz JO, Michiel Sedelaar JP, Kusters-Vandevelde H, Kerkmeijer LGW, Somford DM, Gotthardt M. How Advanced Imaging Will Guide Therapeutic Strategies for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer in the Years to Come. Eur Urol 2022; 82:578-580. [PMID: 36167598 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, clinical use of novel advanced imaging modalities in prostate cancer detection, staging, and therapy has intensified and is currently reforming clinical guidelines. In the future, advanced imaging technologies will continue to develop and become even more accurate, which will offer new opportunities for improving patient selection, surgical treatment, and radiotherapy, with the potential to guide prostate cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melline G M Schilham
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Mark Rijpkema
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tom Scheenen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rick Hermsen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle O Barentsz
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J P Michiel Sedelaar
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Linda G W Kerkmeijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Diederik M Somford
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Gotthardt
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
The Role of PSMA PET/CT in the Primary Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Prostate Cancer-A Practical Clinical Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153638. [PMID: 35892897 PMCID: PMC9367536 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The combination of positron emission tomography (PET)-diagnostics with ligands binding to the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has been a diagnostic milestone in the situation of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer and is gaining importance in primary diagnostics, providing a highly specific and sensitive diagnostic method in various clinical situations. However, the clinical application of this method requires a comprehensive knowledge of its advantages and disadvantages, potential pitfalls and influencing factors. This review aims to provide a practical clinical review of the currently available background data on PSMA PET/CT, as well as the clinical implications. Although a large amount of data already exist, a thorough analysis is complicated by study heterogeneity, showing the need for future systematic and prospective research. Abstract The importance of PSMA PET/CT in both primary diagnostics and prostate cancer recurrence has grown steadily since its introduction more than a decade ago. Over the past years, a vast amount of data have been published on the diagnostic accuracy and the impact of PSMA PET/CT on patient management. Nevertheless, a large heterogeneity between studies has made reaching a consensus difficult; this review aims to provide a comprehensive clinical review of the available scientific literature, covering the currently known data on physiological and pathological PSMA expression, influencing factors, the differences and pitfalls of various tracers, as well as the clinical implications in initial TNM-staging and in the situation of biochemical recurrence. This review has the objective of providing a practical clinical overview of the advantages and disadvantages of the examination in various clinical situations and the body of knowledge available, as well as open questions still requiring further research.
Collapse
|
64
|
Gandaglia G, Mazzone E, Stabile A, Pellegrino A, Cucchiara V, Barletta F, Scuderi S, Robesti D, Leni R, Samanes Gajate AM, Picchio M, Gianolli L, Brembilla G, De Cobelli F, van Oosterom MN, van Leeuwen FWB, Montorsi F, Briganti A. Prostate-specific membrane antigen Radioguided Surgery to Detect Nodal Metastases in Primary Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: Results of a Planned Interim Analysis of a Prospective Phase 2 Study. Eur Urol 2022; 82:411-418. [PMID: 35879127 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extended pelvic nodal dissection (ePLND) represents the gold standard for nodal staging in prostate cancer (PCa). Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioguided surgery (RGS) could identify lymph node invasion (LNI) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). OBJECTIVE To report the planned interim analyses of a phase 2 prospective study (NCT04832958) aimed at describing PSMA-RGS during RARP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A phase 2 trial aimed at enrolling 100 patients with intermediate- or high-risk cN0cM0 PCa at conventional imaging with a risk of LNI of >5% was conducted. Overall, 18 patients were enrolled between June 2021 and March 2022. Among them, 12 patients underwent PSMA-RGS and represented the study cohort. SURGICAL PROCEDURE All patients received 68Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging; 99mTc-PSMA-I&S was synthesised and administered intravenously the day before surgery, followed by single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography. A Drop-In gamma probe was used for in vivo measurements. All positive lesions (count rate ≥2 compared with background) were excised and ePLND was performed. MEASUREMENTS Side effects, perioperative outcomes, and performance characteristics of robot-assisted PSMA-RGS for LNI were measured. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, four (33%), six (50%), and two (17%) patients had intermediate-risk, high-risk, and locally advanced PCa. Overall, two (17%) patients had pathologic nodal uptake at PSMA PET. The median operative time, blood loss, and length of stay were 230 min, 100 ml, and 5 d, respectively. No adverse events and intraoperative complications were recorded. One patient experienced a 30-d complication (Clavien-Dindo 2; 8.3%). Overall, three (25%) patients had LNI at ePLND. At per-region analyses on 96 nodal areas, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of PSMA-RGS were 63%, 99%, 83%, and 96%, respectively. On a per-patient level, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values of PSMA-RGS were 67%, 100%, 100%, and 90%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Robot-assisted PSMA-RGS in primary staging is a safe and feasible procedure characterised by acceptable specificity but suboptimal sensitivity, missing micrometastatic nodal disease. PATIENT SUMMARY Prostate-specific membrane antigen radioguided robot-assisted surgery is a safe and feasible procedure for the intraoperative identification of nodal metastases in cN0cM0 prostate cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection. However, this approach might still miss micrometastatic nodal dissemination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Antony Pellegrino
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Vito Cucchiara
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Scuderi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Robesti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Leni
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Maria Picchio
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Gianolli
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Brembilla
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco De Cobelli
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Matthias N van Oosterom
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Fijs W B van Leeuwen
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Małkiewicz B, Knura M, Łątkowska M, Kobylański M, Nagi K, Janczak D, Chorbińska J, Krajewski W, Karwacki J, Szydełko T. Patients with Positive Lymph Nodes after Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy-Do We Know the Proper Way of Management? Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2326. [PMID: 35565455 PMCID: PMC9104304 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Lymph node invasion in prostate cancer is a significant prognostic factor indicating worse prognosis. While it significantly affects both survival rates and recurrence, proper management remains a controversial and unsolved issue. The thorough evaluation of risk factors associated with nodal involvement, such as lymph node density or extracapsular extension, is crucial to establish the potential expansion of the disease and to substratify patients clinically. There are multiple strategies that may be employed for patients with positive lymph nodes. Nowadays, therapeutic methods are generally based on observation, radiotherapy, and androgen deprivation therapy. However, the current guidelines are incoherent in terms of the most effective management approach. Future management strategies are expected to make use of novel diagnostic tools and therapies, such as photodynamic therapy or diagnostic imaging with prostate-specific membrane antigen. Nevertheless, this heterogeneous group of men remains a great therapeutic concern, and both the clarification of the guidelines and the optimal substratification of patients are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bartosz Małkiewicz
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Miłosz Knura
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-752 Katowice, Poland;
| | - Małgorzata Łątkowska
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Maximilian Kobylański
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Krystian Nagi
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Dawid Janczak
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Joanna Chorbińska
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Jakub Karwacki
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Tomasz Szydełko
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Chen K, O'Brien J, McVey A, Kasivisvanathan V, Murphy DG. Re: Armando Stabile, Antony Pellegrino, Elio Mazzone, et al. Can Negative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Avoid the Need for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Backup Histology as Reference Standard. Eur Urol Oncol 2022;5:1-17. Eur Urol Oncol 2022; 5:375-376. [PMID: 35331682 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth Chen
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Jonathan O'Brien
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Aoife McVey
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|