Safety of presurgical targeted therapy in the setting of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Treatment strategies for advanced renal cell carcinoma: A new paradigm for surgical treatment

The induction of targeted drugs for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma has changed the treatment strategy for systemic therapy. Surgical treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma should also be reconsidered in the light of the effect of targeted drugs. The clinical benefit of cytoreductive nephrectomy for cases of metastatic renal cell carcinoma was proved in randomized trials in the cytokine era. However, at present, there has not been level 1 evidence for this in the targeted therapy era. Patients with better performance status and without poor risk factors tend to benefit from cytoreductive nephrectomy. Two ongoing large-scale randomized studies might shed light on this issue. One of the remarkable differences in the efficacy between cytokines and targeted drugs, particularly tyrosine kinase inhibitors, is the reduction in the size of the primary tumors by tyrosine kinase inhibitors, including sunitinib and axitinib. Initial experiences with targeted therapy suggest that the neoadjuvant setting of tyrosine kinase inhibitors could be a viable option when the primary tumor shows local invasion and/or is unresectable. The present study does not support the routine neoadjuvant use of sunitinib because of the possibility of disease progression during the neoadjuvant therapy, and modest response and benefit. Axitinib, in contrast, shows larger reduction in the size of the primary tumor and might be used in the near future. Another issue is the combination of targeted therapy with metastasectomy. There is a lack of evidence for improved prognosis resulting from the neoadjuvant setting of tyrosine kinase inhibitors followed by metastasectomy. Further studies are warranted to investigate this.

Comprehensive Characterization of the Perioperative Morbidity of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy

BACKGROUND

Although cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) has been associated with perioperative morbidity, data are lacking regarding the risk of prolonged length of stay (pLOS) and delay to receipt of systemic therapy (ST).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of clinicopathologic features with postoperative complications, pLOS, and time to receipt of ST.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We evaluated 294 patients with M1 renal cell carcinoma treated between 1990 and 2009.

INTERVENTIONS

CN.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Logistic and Cox regressions were used to evaluate associations of clinicopathologic features with 30-d postoperative complications, pLOS (LOS ≥75th percentile), and time to receipt of ST.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Fifteen (5%) patients experienced at least one Clavien grade ≥3 early complication. Among patients for whom postsurgical ST was recommended, 61% did not receive ST within 60 d, but the delay was surgery-related in only 11%. In multivariable models limited to preoperative features, liver metastases were associated with complications (odds ratio [OR] 3.73, p=0.004) and pLOS (OR 2.46, p=0.03), while a laparoscopic approach was associated with earlier administration of ST (hazard ratio [HR] 5.05, p<0.001). In multivariable models incorporating operative features, intraoperative transfusion was associated with complications (OR 1.14, p<0.001) and pLOS (OR 1.22, p<0.001), while pN1 disease was associated with pLOS (OR 2.12, p=0.049) and delay to ST (HR 0.38, p=0.004). Limitations include the retrospective design and surgical selection bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, 61% of CN patients did not receive timely ST, but only 5% of patients experienced Clavien grade ≥3 complications and the delay to ST was surgery-related in 11%. Liver metastases, intraoperative transfusion, and pN1 disease were independently associated with perioperative morbidity.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We evaluated the morbidity of cytoreductive nephrectomy and identified predictors of unfavorable perioperative outcomes. Although 61% of patients did not receive timely systemic therapy, the rates of complications and surgery-related delay to systemic therapy were low.

A Phase II Study of Pazopanib in Patients with Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma to Optimize Preservation of Renal Parenchyma

PURPOSE

Preservation of renal function is prioritized during surgical management of localized renal cell carcinoma. VEGF targeted agents can downsize tumors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma and may do the same in localized renal cell carcinoma, allowing for optimal preservation of renal parenchyma associated with partial nephrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients meeting 1 or both of the following criteria were enrolled in a prospective phase II trial, including radical or partial nephrectomy likely to yield a glomerular filtration rate of less than 30 ml/minute/1.73 m(2), or partial nephrectomy high risk due to high complexity (R.E.N.A.L. 10 to 12) or tumor adjacent to hilar vessels. Pazopanib (800 mg once daily) was administered for 8 to 16 weeks with repeat imaging at completion of therapy, followed by surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients enrolled with a median tumor size of 7.3 cm and a median R.E.N.A.L. score of 11. Of index lesions 80% were high complexity and 56% of patients had a solitary kidney. Patients received a median of 8 weeks of pazopanib. The median interval from treatment start to surgery was 10.6 weeks. R.E.N.A.L. score decreased in 71% of tumors and 92% of patients experienced a reduction in tumor volume. Six of 13 patients for whom partial nephrectomy was not possible at baseline were able to undergo partial nephrectomy after treatment. The mean parenchymal volume that could be saved with surgery increased from an estimated 107 to 173 cc (p = 0.0015). In 5 patients a urine leak developed, which was managed conservatively, and 7 received a transfusion, of whom 1 required embolization.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant pazopanib resulted in downsizing localized renal cell carcinoma, allowing for improved preservation of renal parenchyma and enabling partial nephrectomy in a select subset of patients who would otherwise require radical nephrectomy.

Extracranial oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma: current management and future directions

The term 'oligometastases' was formulated to describe an intermediate state between widespread metastases and locally confined disease. The standard of care in metastatic renal cell carcinoma is systemic therapy; however, in patients with solitary or limited metastases, aggressive local therapies may potentially prolong survival. The literature suggests a survival benefit with surgical metastasectomy, with a reported 5-year survival as high as 45% in those who achieve complete resection. More recently, an expanding body of evidence supports the role of stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy for the treatment of oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma and early results demonstrate comparable local control rates with surgery. There is also increasing interest in the abscopal and immunologic effects of localized radiation. With the proliferation of newer targeted agents and immunomodulatory agents, current work is addressing the optimization of patient selection and avenues towards sequencing and combining the various treatment options.

Presurgical sunitinib reduces tumor size and may facilitate partial nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether presurgical sunitinib reduces primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) size and facilitates partial nephrectomy (PN).

METHODS

Data from potential candidates for PN treated with sunitinib with primary RCC in situ were reviewed retrospectively. Primary outcome was reduction in tumor bidirectional area.

RESULTS

Included were 72 potential candidates for PN who received sunitinib before definitive renal surgery on 78 kidneys. Median primary tumor size was 7.2 cm (interquartile range [IQR]: 5.3-8.7 cm) before and 5.3 cm (IQR: 4.1-7.5 cm) after sunitinib treatment (P<0.0001), resulting in 32% reduction in tumor bidirectional area (IQR: 14%-46%). Downsizing occurred in 65 tumors (83%), with 15 partial responses (19%). Tumor complexity per R.E.N.A.L. score was reduced in 59%, with median posttreatment score of 9 (IQR: 8-10). Predictors of lesser tumor downsizing included clinical evidence of lymph node metastases (P<0.0001), non-clear cell histology (P = 0.0017), and higher nuclear grade (P = 0.023). Surgery was performed for 68 tumors (87%) and was not delayed in any patient owing to sunitinib toxicity. Grade ≥ 3 surgical complications occurred in 5 patients (7%). PN was performed for 49 kidneys (63%) after sunitinib, including 76% of patients without and 41% with metastatic disease (P = 0.0026). PN was completed in 100%, 86%, 65%, and 60% of localized cT1a, cT1b, cT2, and cT3 tumors, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Presurgical sunitinib leads to modest tumor reduction in most primary RCC, and many patients can be subsequently treated with PN with acceptable morbidity and preserved renal function. A randomized trial is required to definitively determine whether presurgical therapy enhances feasibility of PN.

Surgical management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the era of targeted therapies

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) has been considered standard management for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) for over a decade. This practice, based on evidence from the immunotherapy era, has now come into question with the dramatic shift in management of mRCC patients due to the development and approval of several targeted molecular therapies (TMT).

METHODS

A comprehensive English language literature review was performed using MEDLINE/PubMed to identify articles and guidelines pertinent to CN in mRCC.

RESULTS

Retrospective studies have demonstrated improved survival for patients who underwent CN compared to those that did not; however, these studies suffer from heavy selection bias. Furthermore, the optimal timing of TMT, before or after surgery is not known. Pre-surgical TMT has the advantage of early treatment of metastases, downsizing of the primary, and may be an effective 'litmus test' for the selection of patients for CN based on response to TMT. The results of two ongoing phase III trials (CARMENA and SURTIME) will address much of the controversy on the role of CN and the timing of systemic therapy in the TMT era. In this review, we aim to present the evidence that lead to adoption of CN in the era of immunotherapies as well as the available data about the oncologic benefit of CN in patients with mRCC who receive TMT as their primary systemic therapy.

CONCLUSION

There seems to be an important role for CN in the era of TMT, mostly in patients with favorable risk and where a high percentage of tumor burden can be removed by cytoreductive surgery.

Efficacy of pre-surgical axitinib for shrinkage of inferior vena cava thrombus in a patient with advanced renal cell carcinoma

The authors present the first case report of pre-surgical axitinib treatment on primary renal tumor and vena cava thrombus. We report the case of a 78-year-old woman with renal cell carcinoma and inferior vena cava tumor thrombus, successfully downstaged with pre-surgical therapy with axitinib. A significant objective response was observed for tumor size and thrombus. After initiation of axitinib therapy, computed tomography showed a decrease, from 57 to 51 mm, in the maximal renal tumor diameter. The tumor thrombus had shortened to 42 mm and had moved to the inferior hepatic vein (Levels 4-3), thereby obviating the need for thoracotomy. The patient finally accepted surgical treatment. Our case was enabled to perform less surgery for advanced renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus using axitinib as a pre-surgical therapy.

Presurgical therapy with axitinib for advanced renal cell carcinoma: a case report

Background

Targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors has been shown to reduce tumor volumes and prolong the survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors, particularly sunitinib, have recently been used in neoadjuvant and presurgical settings. Axitinib is a promising second-line therapy option for advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Herein, we report a patient with advanced renal cell carcinoma who received presurgical treatment with axitinib.

Case presentation

A 73-year-old man was transported by ambulance to a community hospital with chief complaints of high fever and a gait disorder. Computed tomography screening revealed a hypervascular tumor (size, 9 × 8.5 cm) in the lower pole of the left kidney. Upon admission to our hospital, his general condition was poor and his performance status was judged as 3, based on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status criteria. After biopsy for the renal tumor, he received 5 mg of axitinib twice daily for 3 months. No serious adverse events were reported during this treatment. The tumor diameter shrank by 56%. Left radical nephrectomy was performed, and there were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Pathological examination indicated a pT3aN0M0, Furman grade 3, clear cell renal cell carcinoma with necrosis, hyaline degeneration, and hemosiderosis. The patient was asymptomatic and disease-free at 1 year post-diagnosis.

Conclusion

This case study demonstrate that presurgical therapy with axitinib is feasible and might have several potential advantages for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

[New anti-angiogenic strategies in the management of kidney cancer]

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to clarify the current role of adjuvant and neo-adjuvant in the treatment of kidney cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data were explored in Medline (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) using the following MeSH terms or combinations of these keywords: "cancer", "rein", "kidney", "adjuvant", "neoadjuvant", "antiangiogenique", "antiangiogenic" and selecting the items produced in their methodology, their relevance to the theme explored and their date of publication.

RESULTS

Thirty-two English and French items published between 2001 and 2011 were selected: five studies of evidence level 1, nine level 2 studies, nine level 4 studies, five studies at level 5 and four literature reviews. The cytoreductive nephrectomy as first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic kidney cancer is now controversial with the advent of new targeted anti-angiogenic therapies. In neoadjuvant setting, these treatments showed a moderate decrease in tumor volume and rarely improved resectability. In adjuvant setting, their place has yet to be specified and several trials are currently underway.

CONCLUSION

Recent years have seen the anti-angiogenic therapeutic strategies upset in locally advanced and metastatic renal cancer. The development of clinical trials and research protocols will allow us to determine in the near future the optimal therapeutic sequences.

Recent advances in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

In the past 5 years, the treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma has changed dramatically from being largely cytokine-based with the emergence of targeted therapy. Following the elucidation of various molecular pathways in renal cell carcinoma, targeted agents (particularly vascular endothelial growth factor-targeting antiangiogenic agents) now form the backbone of most therapeutic strategies for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and the outcome of treatment has improved. However, many tumors eventually develop resistance to targeted therapy due to secondary mutation of the target protein or compensatory changes within the target pathway that bypass the site of inhibition. On the other hand, there are new forms of immunotherapy that hold the promise of improving the outcome for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. In this article, we describe some of these new therapies, including the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody bevacizumab, several receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (sorafenib, sunitinib, pazopanib, axitinib, and tivozanib), the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors temsirolimus and everolimus, and new immunotherapy modalities, such as anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 antibody and anti-programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 antibody. We also discuss their role in the current management of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Neoadjuvant targeted molecular therapies in patients undergoing nephrectomy and inferior vena cava thrombectomy: is it useful?

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of neoadjuvant targeted molecular therapies (TMTs) on size and level of inferior vena cava tumor thrombi and to evaluate their impact on surgical management.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 14 patients treated for a clear cell renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombi by neoadjuvant TMT before nephrectomy. Clinical, pathological and perioperative data were gathered retrospectively at each institution. The primitive tumor size and the thrombus size were defined by computed tomography before TMT. The tumor thrombus level was defined according to the Novick's classification.

RESULTS

Before TMT, thrombus level was staged I for 1 (7%), II for 10 (72%) and III (21%) for 3 patients. First-line therapy was sunitinib in 11 cases and sorafenib in 3 cases. Median therapy duration was two cycles (1-5). Three patients experienced major adverse effects (grade III) during TMT. Following TMT, 6 (43%) patients had a measurable decrease, 6 (43%) had no change, and 2 (14%) had an increase in the thrombus. One patient (7%) had a downstage of thrombus level, 12 (85%) had stable thrombi, and 1 (7%) had an upstage. Regarding primary tumor, 7 (50%), 5 (36%) and 2 (14%) patients had a decrease, stabilization and an increase in tumor size, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant TMT appears to have limited effects on renal tumor thrombi. This retrospective study failed to demonstrate a significant impact of neoadjuvant TMT on surgical management of clear cell renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombi.

The role of surgery for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the era of targeted therapies

PURPOSE

With the emergence of targeted therapies, the indications of cytoreductive nephrectomy have to be redefined. This review article presents the evidence data guiding our current indications of surgery in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the era of targeted therapies.

METHODS

A nonsystematic review of the electronic databases PubMed and MEDLINE from 1980 to 2012 was performed and limited to English language.

RESULTS

Two studies based on immunotherapy (EORTC 30947 and SWOG 8949) were at the origins of the recommendations on initial nephrectomy for patients with mRCC. Since the introduction of angiogenesis inhibitors, there is still no high-level evidence from prospective studies assessing the indication of surgery for mRCC. However, surgery still has its importance in the management of primary tumors and metastasis with the objective of an optimal balance between morbidity, quality of life, and survival. The treatment sequence between surgery and targeted therapies is still to be established and two randomized prospective studies were then specifically designed and are currently recruiting.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary evidence data from retrospective series seem to be in favor of a benefit of surgery for patients with good and intermediate prognosis. However, patients' inclusions in current prospective studies are highly recommended to clearly precise nephrectomy's indications.

Cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the era of targeted therapy in the United States: a SEER analysis

PURPOSE

Two randomized trials published in 2001 provided level 1 evidence for the use of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CyNx) for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, the regulatory approval of vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKI) in 2005 has left an "evidence void" regarding the use of CyNx. We evaluated the patterns in the use of CyNx in the cytokine and VEGFR-TKI eras, and the patient characteristics associated with the use of CyNx.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry was used to identify patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IV RCC between 2001 and 2008. Patients were classified as treated during the cytokine (2001-2005) or VEGFR-TKI (2006-2008) eras. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate the odds of undergoing CyNx according to treatment era and socioeconomic characteristics.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,112 of 2,448 patients (45%) underwent CyNx. CyNx use remained stable between 2001 and 2005 (50%), but decreased to 38% in 2008. Logistic regression analysis revealed that older age (OR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68, 0.99), black race (OR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.46, 0.91), Hispanic ethnicity (OR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.54, 0.93), and treatment in the VEGFR-TKI era (OR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68, 0.99) were independently associated with decreased use of CyNx.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of CyNx in the United States has declined in the VEGFR-TKI era. Older patients and minorities are less likely to receive CyNx. Results of ongoing phase III trials are needed to refine the role of this treatment modality.

Selecting patients for cytoreductive nephrectomy in advanced renal cell carcinoma: who and when

Renal cell carcinoma presents with metastatic disease in approximately 30% of patients at the time of diagnosis. Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) of the primary tumor in the face of metastatic disease is part of a multimodality approach including systemic therapy that is based on evidence from randomized trials in the cytokine era. Data from the pretargeted therapy era showed that CN had a clear role in metastatic renal cell carcinoma, increasing life expectancy by approximately 6 months. The substantial improvement in outcomes reported for targeted therapy has challenged the previous role of CN. However, despite the absence of data from Phase III trials, available evidence suggests that some patients may benefit substantially from CN in the era of targeted therapy. This review summarizes current arguments for CN and how to best select patients for surgery. Ongoing trials are key in generating evidence towards a personalized approach to debulking nephrectomy.

Salvage lymph node dissection with adjuvant radiotherapy for nodal recurrence of prostate cancer

PURPOSE

We evaluated the impact of salvage lymph node dissection with adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with nodal recurrence of prostate cancer. By default, nodal recurrence of prostate cancer is treated with palliative antihormonal therapy, which causes serious side effects and invariably leads to the development of hormone refractory disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 47 patients with nodal recurrence of prostate cancer based on evidence of (11)C-choline/(18)F-choline ((18)F-fluorethylcholine) positron emission tomography-computerized tomography underwent primary (2 of 52), secondary (45 of 52), tertiary (4 of 52) and quaternary (1 of 52) salvage lymph node dissection with histological confirmation. Of 52 salvage lymph node dissections 27 were followed by radiotherapy. Biochemical response was defined as a prostate specific antigen less than 0.2 ng/ml after salvage therapy. The Kaplan-Meier method, binary logistic regression and Cox regression were used to analyze survival as well as predictors of biochemical response and clinical progression.

RESULTS

Mean prostate specific antigen at salvage lymph node dissection was 11.1 ng/ml. A mean of 23.3 lymph nodes were removed per salvage lymph node dissection. Median followup was 35.5 months. Of 52 salvage lymph node dissections 24 resulted in complete biochemical response followed by 1-year biochemical recurrence-free survival of 71.8%. Gleason 6 or less (OR 7.58, p = 0.026), Gleason 7a/b (OR 5.91, p = 0.042) and N0 status at primary therapy (OR 8.01, p = 0.011) were identified as independent predictors of biochemical response. Gleason 8-10 (HR 3.5, p = 0.039) as a preoperative variable, retroperitoneal positive lymph nodes (HR 3.76, p = 0.021) and incomplete biochemical response (HR 4.0, p = 0.031) were identified as postoperative predictors of clinical progression. Clinical progression-free survival was 25.6% and cancer specific survival was 77.7% at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on (11)C/(18)F-choline positron emission tomography-computerized tomography as a diagnostic tool, salvage lymph node dissection is feasible for the treatment of nodal recurrence of prostate cancer. Most patients experience biochemical recurrence after salvage lymph node dissection. However, a specific population has a lasting complete prostate specific antigen response.

Current and future systemic treatments for renal cell carcinoma

Systemic treatment of renal cell carcinoma has changed dramatically since 2007, with the development and approval of six new agents, which target complex molecular pathways regulating tumour angiogenesis and cell proliferation and survival. These treatments have significantly improved survival times in metastatic renal cell carcinoma, but remain palliative. A number of newer agents are in clinical development, which offer theoretical advantages over existing treatments, and research methodologies are adapting with the aim of defining an individualised approach to therapy which exploits the underlying tumour biology. This review will provide an overview of current and emerging systemic treatments and how they might be integrated with surgical therapy, with a particular focus on advanced, clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Trends in the use of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the United States

BACKGROUND

Two randomized trials published in 2001 established CyNx for patients with metastatic renal carcinoma (mRCC) as a treatment standard in the cytokine era. However, first-line systemic therapy for mRCC changed in 2005 with FDA approval of VEGFR TKIs. We evaluated the patterns of use of CyNx from 2000 to 2008.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed with mRCC. Patients who underwent CyNx were identified and were further categorized by pre-VEGFR versus VEGFR TKI era, race, insurance status, and hospital. For these subcategories, prevalence ratios (PRs) were generated using the proportion of patients with mRCC undergoing CyNx versus those not undergoing CyNx.

RESULTS

Of the 47,417 patients (pts) identified with mRCC, the prevalence of cytoreductive nephrectomy increased 3% each year from 2000 to 2005 (P < .0001), then decreased 3% each year from 2005 to 2008 (P = .0048), with a significant difference between the eras (0.97 vs. 1.025; P < .0001). Black and Hispanic pts were less likely than Caucasian pts to undergo CyNx. Pts with Medicaid, Medicare, and no insurance were less likely than pts with private insurance to undergo CyNx. Pts diagnosed at community hospitals were significantly less likely than pts at teaching hospitals to undergo CyNx.

CONCLUSION

The use of CyNx has declined in the VEGFR-TKI era. In addition, racial and socioeconomic disparities exist in the use of CyNx. The results of pending randomized trials evaluating the role of CyNx in the VEGFR-TKI era are awaited to optimize use of this modality and address potential disparities.

Role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the era of targeted therapy for renal cell carcinoma

With the advent of targeted therapy for the treatment of metastatic renal cancer, the routine use of cytoreductive nephrectomy has been questioned. However, available data suggest that cytoreductive nephrectomy remains an integral part of treatment in properly selected patients. This review details the rationale for the continued use of cytoreductive nephrectomy in acceptable surgical candidates in the era of targeted therapy.

Neoadjuvant therapy of renal cell carcinoma: a novel treatment option in the era of targeted therapy?

The study was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness, toxicity and optimal duration of neoadjuvant therapy for patients with organ-confined or locally advanced renal cell carcinoma in the era of targeted agents. A literature review was carried out using Medline/Pubmed articles, as well as congress reports from the last five American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Urological Association and European Association of Urology Annual Meetings. Neoadjuvant targeted therapy is feasible and shows toxicity similar to that seen in a palliative setting. Most studies recommend an application for 2-4 months. The current data situation is best for sunitinib. Surgery can apparently be carried out the day right after discontinuing the drug. However, even sunitinib leads to only a mean 10% decrease in primary tumor size, and one-quarter to one-fifth of all patients show local tumor progression during treatment. Few patients (approximately 12%) with a vena cava tumor thrombus achieve a significant decrease in its level under neoadjuvant therapy; here too, progression is observed in a significant number of cases. Even the new targeted agents show limited effectiveness in achieving relevant remissions of the primary tumor. Furthermore, tumor progression is seen in a significant percentage of patients during neoadjuvant therapy. Thus, even today in the era of targeted agents, a neoadjuvant approach should only be made in patients with localized or locally advanced renal cell carcinoma, which primarily seem to be absolutely inaccessible by (partial) nephrectomy.

The impact of delaying radical nephrectomy for stage II or higher renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of surgical waiting time (SWT) on outcomes of patients who underwent radical nephrectomy for stage II or higher renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

METHODS

Of the 1,732 patients who underwent surgery for RCC between 1989 and 2007, medical records of 319 with clinical stage II or higher RCC without distant metastases were retrospectively reviewed. Ten patients with SWT greater than 3 months were excluded from analysis, and we compared pathological upstaging and survival rates between patients with SWT <1 month (234/319, 73.3 %) and 1-3 months (75/319, 23.5 %).

RESULTS

Clinicopathological characteristics between two groups were not different except the presence of symptom. The pathological upstaging was higher in patients with SWT of 1-3 months but statistically not significant. SWT of 1-3 months was not an independent predictor of pathological upstaging, recurrence-free survival (RFS; p = 0.896), or cancer-specific survival (CSS; p = 0.737). On subgroup analysis by TNM stage (cT2NxcM0 and cT3-4NxcM0), SWT of 1-3 months was not an independent predictor of pathological upstaging and was not associated with RFS or CSS. SWT, treated as a continuous variable, was also not an independent predictor of outcome in any subgroup. Similar results were found in symptomatic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of patients with prolonged SWT did not differ from those of most patients who underwent nephrectomy within 1 month. In patients with stage II or higher RCC who underwent nephrectomy within 3 months after diagnosis, prolonged SWT was not an independent predictor of pathological upstaging, RFS, or CSS.

Consolidative surgery after targeted therapy for renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma is the most lethal of the common genitourinary neoplasms, with 30% to 40% of patients eventually dying from disease progression. Although the recent development of targeted therapies against kidney cancer has yielded substantially improved tumor response rates and progression-free survival, these agents are still not curative. The integration of systemic therapies with surgery still represents the best management for select patients with advanced disease. Specifically, consolidative surgery may play a vital role in the management of this challenging patient population. However, concerns remain regarding the potential for increased surgical morbidity complicating the integration of surgery after targeted therapy. Careful patient selection and specific precautions to increase surgical safety should be implemented.