Randomized controlled open-label trial of four treatment regimens for pemphigus vulgaris

Is There a Role for Opportunistic Infection Prophylaxis in Pemphigus? An Expert Survey

BACKGROUND

Opportunistic infections (OIs) are a dreaded adverse effect of immunosuppressive therapy, leading to the use of opportunistic infection prophylaxis (OIP) in many immunosuppressed conditions. However, guidelines for OIP in pemphigus are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to evaluate the approach of leading pemphigus experts towards OIP.

METHODS

We conducted an online survey of OIP trends.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 33 experts. Prior to initiation of immunosuppressive therapy, 75% routinely screened for hepatitis viruses, and at least half screened for HIV or tuberculosis. Most experts (76%) prescribed OIP but to <10% of their patients, and the most frequent drugs of choice were sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim and acyclovir. Most experts agreed that treatment with three or more immunosuppressive agents or a previous history of OIs would lead to the use of OIP that was then discontinued with cessation of immunosuppression. The arguments against OIP were the lack of evidence for its necessity and concern about side effects or emergence of resistant pathogens. The surveyed experts treated patients with severe disease in a tertiary care setting, which may have led to an overestimation of the use of OIP. Infectious disease specialists were not included.

CONCLUSION

Substantial disparities exist in approaches to OIP for patients with pemphigus, including the decision to treat, type of treatment, and risk stratification among pemphigus experts.

A Comparative Effectiveness Research of Azathioprine and Cyclophosphamide on the Clinical and Serological Response in Pemphigus Vulgaris

CONTEXT

A prospective study was carried out to examine the efficacy of cyclophosphamide and azathioprine in pemphigus vulgaris.

AIMS

To compare the clinical and serological effect of azathioprine and cyclophosphamide in pemphigus patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospective, institutional based study was conducted twenty-one patients of pemphigus vulgaris were initiated on either azathioprine (n = 9) or cyclophosphamide (n = 7) in addition to prednisolone and were evaluated clinically (mucosal and cutaneous severity) and serologically enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) at 0, 3 and 6 months.

RESULTS

Azathioprine had a slower onset of action with a statistically significant improvement seen by 6 months (P = 0.016). Cyclophosphamide had a faster onset of action (3 months) though there was no statistical difference in the efficacy between the two at the end of 6 months. The (RonT) was 33.3-44.4% for azathioprine and 28.8-42.9% for cyclophosphamide at 6 months. Though ELISA had a high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis, as a tool for assessing therapeutic response a significant decrease was seen only till 3 months. This was restricted to Dsg1 for the azathioprine group and both Dsg3 and Dsg1 levels for the cyclophosphamide group. There were two deaths, both in the cyclophosphamide group.

CONCLUSIONS

Azathiorpine and cyclophosphamide are equally effective for mucosal and cutaneous disease in pemphigus after 6 months of therapy. Dsg ELISA is useful for diagnosis of pemphigus but is not a useful tool for monitoring response to therapy.

Management of Pemphigus Vulgaris

INTRODUCTION

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a chronic, autoimmune, vesiculobullous disease. As a result of the relative rarity of PV, published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are limited, which makes it difficult to evaluate the efficacy of different treatment regimens in this disease. This also precludes conduct of a meta-analysis.

METHODS

English-language publications describing treatment outcomes of patients with PV were identified by searches of electronic databases through May 2015, and additionally by review of the bibliography of these publications. A total of 89 papers, which included 21 case reports, 47 case series, 8 RCTs, and 13 observational studies, were identified. The findings from these publications, including information on disease course and prognosis, medications used, treatment responses, and side effects, are summarized in the tables and text of this review.

RESULTS

Prior to availability of corticosteroid therapy, PV had a high fatality rate. Early publications from the 1970s reported high-dose, prolonged corticosteroid use and significant associated side effects. Later reports described use of corticosteroids along with steroid-sparing adjuvants, which allows a reduction in the total dose of corticosteroids and a reduction in observed mortality and morbidity. For the majority of patients in these reports, a long-term course on medications lasting about 5-10 years was observed; however, subgroups of patients requiring shorter courses or needing longer-term therapy have also been described. Early diagnosis of PV and early initiation of treatment were prognostic factors. In recent publications, commonly used initial regimens include corticosteroids in combination with mycophenolate or azathioprine; whereas, for patients with inadequate response to these regimens, adjuvants such as intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or rituximab are used.

CONCLUSION

The review findings emphasize the importance of early diagnosis, early initiation of treatment, and use of steroid-sparing adjuvants to allow a reduced total dose and duration on corticosteroids. Also highlighted is the need for more RCTs.

Cyclophosphamide in dermatology

Cyclophosphamide is a chemotherapeutic agent which was first discovered in experimental tumours in rats, and it has since been widely used to treat malignancies and severe manifestations of various auto-immune diseases. High-dose chemotherapy and continuous daily oral regimens are associated with significant toxicity profiles, but i.v. pulsed regimens have lowered the rates of adverse effects in rheumatological studies. Cyclophosphamide has been shown to be useful in the treatment of severe autoimmune conditions due to its powerful immunosuppressive ability; however, it remains a relatively underused modality in dermatology. This article reviews the current literature on cyclophosphamide and its clinical applications in dermatology.

Autoimmune bullous diseases with skin and eye involvement: Cicatricial pemphigoid, pemphigus vulgaris, and pemphigus paraneoplastica

Autoimmune blistering diseases are a heterogeneous group of disorders that mostly affect the skin and mucous membranes. Occasionally, other organ systems may be involved, depending on the unique pathophysiology of each disease. Cicatricial pemphigoid, pemphigus vulgaris, and paraneoplastic pemphigus are distinct entities, but all have the potential to have cutaneous and ocular involvement. Awareness and early recognition of ocular involvement in these diseases is important given the increased risk for vision loss and blindness with delay in management. Several skin diseases may be associated with involvement of the external eye. The most common autoimmune diseases are cicatricial pemphigoid, pemphigus vulgaris, and paraneoplastic pemphigus.

Management of pemphigus vulgaris: challenges and solutions

The main objective in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris is to control the disease, prevent relapses, and avoid adverse events associated with the prolonged use of steroids and immunosuppressive agents. Systemic corticosteroids remain the gold standard treatment for pemphigus vulgaris. Azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil are the first line of steroid-sparing treatment. Rituximab is extremely effective in recalcitrant pemphigus, when other treatments fail to control the disease. The European Dermatology Forum recommends tapering prednisolone by 25% every 2 weeks after the consolidation phase, and a 5 mg reduction every 4 weeks when the dose is reduced to <20 mg. If the patient relapses, options include increasing steroids back to the previous dose, adding an immunosuppressant if using steroid monotherapy, or replacing a first-line immunosuppressant by another if already on combination therapy.

Evaluation of cases of pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus from a reference service in Pará state, Brazil

BACKGROUND

Pemphigusis a bullous, rare and chronic autoimmune disease. There are two major forms of pemphigus: vulgaris and foliaceus. Epidemiological data and clinical outcome in patients diagnosed in the Brazilian Amazon states are still rare.

OBJECTIVES

To study the occurrence of the disease during the study period and analyze the epidemiological profile of patients, the most common subtype of pemphigus, and the clinical evolution of patients.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of medical records of hospitalized patients with pemphigus foliaceus and pemphigus vulgaris in the period from 2003 to 2010 in Dermatology Service of Hospital Fundação Santa Casa de Misericórdia do Pará, Belém, Northern Brazil.

RESULTS

We found a total of 20 cases of pemphigus during the study period, 8 of which were of foliaceus pemphigus and 12 of vulgaris pemphigus. Pemphigus foliaceus had the predominance of male patients (75%), showed satisfactory clinical evolution, and was characterized by absence of pediatric cases. Pemphigus vulgaris affected more women (66.7%), showed mean hospital stay of 1 to 3 months (50%), and there were three cases of death (25%). The prescribed immunosuppressive drugs included prednisone with or without combination of azathioprine and/or dapsone. Sepsis was associated with 100% of the deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of the disease is rare, there are no familiar/endemic outbreaks in the sample. Evolution is usually favorable, but secondary infection is associated with worse prognosis. The choice of best drugs to treat pemphigus remains controversial.

Treatment of pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

No optimal therapeutic approach has been established for pemphigus.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy, steroid-sparing effect, and safety of available treatment modalities.

METHODS

PubMed, LILACS (up to July 2014), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, issue 5 of 12, May 2014), and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry and reference lists were searched for randomized controlled trials of any treatment modality for pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus. Data were extracted independently by two authors using predefined appraisal criteria and data fields.

RESULTS

A total of 20 studies (826 participants) were included. Most were small and open-labeled; all but seven were not concealed for allocation. Owing to the variability in intervention arms, five meta-analyses were performed, each pooling the data of two to three trials. Studies excluded from the meta-analyses were described quantitatively. Azathioprine had a steroid-sparing effect but did not increase remission rate. Mycophenolate mofetil induced sustained remission more quickly than did placebo and delayed time to relapse but did not have a steroid-sparing effect or favorable remission rate. Cyclophosphamide had a steroid-sparing effect, though less than azathioprine, but did not affect the remission rate or time-to-disease control. Intravenous immunoglobulin had more favorable short-term efficacy than did placebo. Topical epidermal growth factor hastened lesion healing.

CONCLUSIONS

Although some of the available therapeutic modalities for pemphigus are beneficial in terms of steroid-sparing, hastening response, or delaying relapse, none were found to increase the complete response rate compared with glucocorticoids alone, currently the mainstay of treatment. Multicenter randomized controlled trials and case control studies with uniform outcome measures are warranted.

Pemphigus. S2 Guideline for diagnosis and treatment--guided by the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) in cooperation with the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV)

BACKGROUND

Pemphigus encompasses a group of life-threatening autoimmune bullous diseases characterized by blisters and erosions of the mucous membranes and skin. Before the era of immunosuppressive treatment, the prognosis of pemphigus was almost fatal. Due to its rarity, only few prospective controlled therapeutic trials are available.

OBJECTIVES

For this reason, a group of European dermatologists with a long-standing interest and expertise in basic and clinical pemphigus research has sought to define diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines for the management of patients with pemphigus.

RESULTS

This group identified the statements of major agreement or disagreement regarding the diagnostic and therapeutic management of pemphigus. The revised final version of the pemphigus guideline was finally passed on to the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) for a final consensus with the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) and the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS).

Management of pemphigus

Pemphigus is an autoimmune blistering disease characterized by cutaneous and mucosal blisters and erosions. Though systemic corticosteroids have been the mainstay of treatment for pemphigus over the years, more recently research has focused on steroid-sparing agents. This review looks at the commonly used steroid-sparing agents in pemphigus and the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) supporting their use.

Mycophenolate mofetil and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus

What is known and objective: Pemphigus is a severe, potentially life-threatening autoimmune blistering disease. The use of corticosteroids has dramatically improved the prognosis and changed its course. However, current morbidity of pemphigus is largely iatrogenic, caused by side effects of the long-term, high-dose corticosteroid therapy that is necessary to sustain disease control. In order to minimize side effects, a range of corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents have been introduced, including mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS). A systematic review was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of MMF and EC-MPS in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus.

METHODS

A retrospective literature search was conducted through multiple electronic databases (PubMed, Medline, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews) for reports on the use of mycophenolic acid (MPA) in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies with a total of 239 patients have evaluated the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliac;eus with MPA. The majority of patients had refractory disease treated with corticosteroids as monotherapy or associated to adjuvant agents.

DISCUSSION

The results of this review suggest that MPA, as MMF or EC-MPS, may be a promising adjuvant or alternative therapy for the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus. It appears safe, at least in the medium term and its adverse events seem to be dose dependent.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The use of mycophenolate is first-line adjuvant therapy in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus.

[Pemphigus vulgaris. Therapy with cyclophosphamide]

Pemphigus vulgaris is an autoimmune blistering disorder. The diagnosis is based on clinical presentation, histology, and direct and indirect immunofluorescence. Optimal treatment remains the greatest challenge. Treatment options include combinations of systemic steroids with azathioprine, mycophenolate, and cyclophosphamide. However, there is little solid data regarding the drug of choice. In our patient, the best tolerated and effective treatment was found after several therapeutic attempts.

Pediatric pemphigus vulgaris: durable treatment responses achieved with prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a chronic autoimmune blistering disease of the skin and mucous membranes. Most cases occur in adults; cases in children are rare. This report describes the clinical presentations and treatment responses of three children with PV, as confirmed according to histology and indirect immunofluorescence studies. In all three cases, oral prednisone used in conjunction with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) resulted in complete clinical remission, during which all pharmacotherapy was successfully discontinued. Resolution of the skin and mucosal blistering tended to occur quickly with prednisone, and after initiation of treatment with MMF, discontinuation of all pharmacotherapy was achieved within a range of 10 to 30 months in the three patients. One patient experienced a recurrence of genital lesions 19 months after discontinuation of therapy, but the condition remitted within 2 weeks with topical corticosteroid therapy. At the time of this report, the duration of complete remission ranged from 6 to 19 months. In summary, combination therapy with prednisone and MMF for pediatric PV appears to be a safe and effective approach that is associated with durable remission.

Adjuvant rituximab therapy of pemphigus: a single-center experience with 31 patients

BACKGROUND

We conducted a retrospective study of patients with pemphigus vulgaris (n = 24) and foliaceus (n = 7) treated with adjuvant rituximab to determine efficacy and adverse events. The end point for efficacy was complete remission of disease taking no or minimal therapy.

OBSERVATIONS

Eighteen patients (58%) achieved the study end point. Of these, 13 patients achieved complete remission off systemic therapy. Patients achieving the study end point had a median disease duration before rituximab therapy of 19 months vs 86 months in those not achieving the end point (P = .01). For the 18 patients achieving the end point, the median (SD) duration of remission was 19 (2) months. Eight of these 18 patients (44%) relapsed from 6 to 17 months after treatment. Serious adverse events attributed to rituximab treatment (osteomyelitis or phlegmon) occurred in 2 patients (6%). In paired serum samples from 10 patients before and after rituximab treatment, the percent change in serum desmoglein index value (median, -80%) was unrelated to the percent change in pneumococcal antibodies (median, +8%) (Spearman rank correlation coefficient r = -0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with rituximab earlier in the course of disease may have better outcomes. A discussion of rituximab's mechanism of action supports the rationale for early therapy. Prospective clinical studies are necessary to substantiate this observation.

Randomized double blind trial of prednisolone and azathioprine, vs. prednisolone and placebo, in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris

BACKGROUND

The classic treatment for pemphigus vulgaris is prednisolone. Immunosuppressive drugs can be used in association.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of Azathioprine in reducing the Disease Activity Index (DAI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A double blind randomized controlled study was conducted on 56 new patients, assigned to two therapeutic groups: (i) prednisolone plus placebo; (ii) prednisolone plus Azathioprine. Patients were checked regularly for 1 year. 'Complete remission' was defined as healing of all lesions after 12 months, and prednisolone <7.5 mg daily, (DAI ≤ 1). Analysis was done by 'Intention To Treat' (ITT) and 'Treatment Completed Analysis' (TCA).

RESULTS

Both groups were similar in age, gender, disease duration, and DAI. Primary endpoint: By ITT and TCA, the mean DAI improved in both groups with no significant difference between them. The difference became significant for the last trimester (3 months; ITT: P = 0.033, TCA: P = 0.045). Secondary endpoint: The total steroid dose decreased significantly in both groups, with no significant difference between them, except for the last trimester (ITT: P = 0.011, TCA: P = 0.035). The mean daily steroid dose decreased gradually in both groups becoming statistically significant in favour of azathioprine, in the last trimester, especially at 12th months (ITT: P = 0.002, TCA: P = 0.005). Complete remission was significant at 12 months only for TCA (AZA/Control: 53.6%/39.9%, P = 0.043).

LIMITATIONS

Sample size was rather small to demonstrate all differences. Other limitations include the choice of primary and secondary endpoints and the unavailability to measure thiopurine methyltransferase activity.

CONCLUSION

Azathioprine helps to reduce prednisolone dose in long-run.

Autoimmune bullous skin diseases. Part 2: diagnosis and therapy

Autoimmune bullous skin diseases represent a heterogenous group of disorders of skin and mucosa which are commonly associated with IgG or IgA autoantibodies against distinct adhesion molecules of the skin. The antibodyinduced loss of adhesion between epidermis and dermis results in blister formation and extensive erosions. There is a great need for rapidly establishing the diagnosis of these disorders since they may run a severe and potentially life-threatening course. In addition, because of their rarity and heterogeneous symptoms, autoimmune bullous skin diseases often pose a major diagnostic challenge. While histopathological examinations provide evidence for the level of blister formation, immunofluorescence microscopy has been established to identify tissue-bound and circulating autoantibodies. Direct immunofluorescence microscopy represents the gold standard for detecting tissue-bound autoantibodies. Indirect immunofluorescence microscopy with defined tissue substrates is considered the first step in detecting circulating autoantibodies. Confirmatory tests such as ELISA, immunoblot or immunoprecipitation analyses are performed utilizing recombinant proteins or keratinocyte extracts. The later assays can be used for primary diagnosis as well as for immunoserological follow-up. Systemic immunosuppressive drugs usually represent the main therapeutic regimen. Initially, systemic corticosteroids are commonly administered in combination with steroid-sparing, immunosuppressive agents. Novel targeted treatments such as immunoadsorption, rituximab or high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins have proven to be highly effective in severe and refractory pemphigus. This review presents a state-of-the-art algorithm for making the diagnosis of autoimmune bullous disorders and provides an overview on currently available therapeutic options.

Urban legends: pemphigus vulgaris

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is the most common type of pemphigus. PV pathogenesis is still debated, and treatment remains challenging. We investigated five controversial topics: (1) What are the target antigens in PV? (2) Do desmogleins adequately address PV pathophysiology? (3) How does acantholysis occur in PV? (4) Is PV still a lethal disease? (5) What is the role of rituximab (RTX) in PV treatment? Results from extensive literature searches suggested the following: (1) Target antigens of PV include a variety of molecules and receptors that are not physically compartmentalized within the epidermis. (2) PV is caused by a variety of autoantibodies to keratinocyte self-antigens, which concur to cause blistering by acting synergistically. (3) The concept of apoptolysis distinguishes the unique mechanism of autoantibody-induced keratinocyte damage in PV from other known forms of cell death. (4) PV remains potentially life-threatening largely because of treatment side effects, but it is uncertain which therapies carry the highest likelihood of lethal risk. (5) RTX is a very promising treatment option in patients with widespread recalcitrant or life-threatening PV. RTX's cost is an issue, its long-term side effects are still unknown, and randomized controlled trials are needed to establish the optimal dosing regimen.

Azathioprine in the treatment of autoimmune blistering diseases

Although there are no standard guidelines for the treatment of autoimmune blistering diseases, azathioprine has shown good efficacy in acquired autoimmune blistering diseases, and is well tolerated. Side effects of azathioprine normally occur in mild variants. Severe reactions are due to reduced thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) or inosine triphosphate pyrophosphohydrolase (ITPA) activity. Therefore, screening for TPMT activity should be conducted in white patients and Africans, whereas Japanese should be screened for ITPA activity before therapy with azathioprine is started. Azathioprine is clinically meaningful for the treatment of pemphigus.